Newspaper Page Text
CTela03 k. "KTrimawariTTHA m mm in 31 E K-Jf LTill3EK T. prescott, Arizona, Saturday morxixo, February n, m. Tlic Arizona Miner. 4fKP EVERY SATURDAY MORNING. AT IT. YAVAPAI COUNTY, ARIZONA jjv-.l. II. MARION t Co. JS INVARIABLE IN ADVANCE. stjjrsc RJTPXld: : ''W YMT, Month Thre Months, pie, .S7 00 . 400 . 2 50 25 A1)VK R.T I S 1 3t s(Jvr one lime, $3.00; each addttioua! ivneb ddh.lonl qaar, Mine rate. ilnt mHI be od to persona con t i same advertfaetrteot for three, lx, or ' i.'hg. j il and business card Inserted upo i term. Job .TPx-iixtiiigr. Mm: office is well HupplM with I'reascs, F auI Ornamental Type, and the pro dcturmluwl to execute all work with n .v 1 ordered from any part of the ' rr - , nid, when arcoin panted with the rash, raruptlv executed and sent hi' mail, or J 3 .fMW moy "H"" i ' at th- risk. , Tender Notes Utken at par in payment ' M r' 'inn, nioerUtng and job loor, ! orders and Wtera to "Tub Minsk," Preacott, Arizona. JXPOSUEE OF A JUDICIAL "VAR MINT." I-tom ReaviB, U. S. Judge of the Second Jrlcfcu District ot law xemtoiy ao-si-ci by PeUrda of His own Making. ; Administrator Appointed. T ' itory of Arizona, county ol i uraa f. T-i t matter of tho estate or ju i r, if.a-'d. Tn the Probate Court, , . , riona Territory. i V V. Mix, Public Administrator, is hereby i tlicn -m tue hands of Messrs. Hooper, Whit Pi nifcd administrator of the estate of M. j jnrr & fjo., doing business at the said tovp 1) Mubns, debcoscd. ,ofA!rizona City, without the concurrence, iv bnd tbiij 5tb day f Atobcr, novicdgc and consent of his co-ad ministra- v. itb tLe sa! ol t:,e ProbaU tor jt. B. Kelley, in a manner to arouse sus i C-H. Bait er, ! piciou touching the motive for such posses- v of AriMna. tuniy of Yuma. I i court oe ng iwuy sausucu oi mo uun icn.pt u " CooH M Judicial Distri-.t. In j ous conduct ot the defendant Mix, it is or ,the tiii of Marcus D I ob- j dcrcd nd . adjudged that said defendant be tins, fc.ea?ed. Appeal from tho Probate I Court , It. jB. Kelley appellant, vs. A. A. Mix, Fu'fV Administrator, appellee. This cristt cottitns on for hearing. J- P. Ihrsrave, attorney for appellant, and Win. & Hilkr for appe'llee, by an agreement of tie x artios, the Name U by the Court dismiss ed sjii the &Howiiii order is made; That It. & Letter act hi coninnction with A. A. Mix, J . . x . .. j xi. . as r R3muustrator oi said estate, anu mat - 'they proofti J settle the tame at the earli- cst time practicable; Tsham Riuvis, Judge. l rcby cortafy this to be a true and cor treet copy of the original on file at my office. J. W, Doruinoton-, Clerk. Rejrvia Allbw3 Order for Contempt. Territory of Ariroaa -vwif; to show cause. .trlstllowed because oTemptttoV conduct of the defendant. De ccnjbfr ii i?73- IwiAst PvEAVis, Judge. X icteby ecrfify this to be a true and cor--ct cojy of the original on file at mv office. J. v .JD'quuiN'GTOx. Clerk. Proceedings for-'Contempt SCecritory of Arizyrn ra. A. A. Mix. Order at, chambers to-show ausc. It harinc beea, mswkL to appear before; mo f t ekmbcfsrtiat A.!rMix, who was hcre- A. D; 187L at Ana" datf iwf tHe Karcmlr ( tratof.-UMj XSfcriot- Cortrfoe 4,Iie year ,&re- I Jvitu,R;,Bs,IvfUer,aR the anwnistruoi. k t estate ot M u. tk Oort eoferrtc tM him tiw omcenu IT 3 art-T itf.pecsuiKerfA fk of tb Xrt;i required'! t.4;brww.r mi ing Judge of this court nt cbambcrs to the defendant to appear in this court at its ad journed November term, to be hoklcn at Ari- zona oity, in the county of Yuma and Terri tory of Arizona, on the 25th day of Dee., A, D. 1871, to answer an alleged contempt of the lawful authority of the District Court, in this that the said defendant had in the view nnd knowledge of said presiding Judge at chambers contemptuously disobeyed the law ful order of said court made and entered at and during the November term, A. D. 1871, of said court, appointing said defendant co administrator with II. B. Kellej' on the es tate of M. I). Dobbins, deceased, in a cause, then pending in said District Court, on ap peal from the Probate Court of said county, wherein It. B. Kelley was the appellant and the said defendant Mix was the appellee, in volving the question of the right of adminis tration on said estate, of the parties litigant ; and cause coming on regularly to be heard at the time aforesaid, by agreement of the par tics entered of record, said cause was dis missed and an order entered by said court appointing both the said It. B. Kelley and the said defendant Mix administrators to act conjointly in the administration of said es tate ; and it appearing to the presiding Judge of this court at chambers in his presence and view that the defendant Mix was disobeying and disregarding the order so made and en tered as aforesaid, and to which he was a con senting party, in a derisive and contemptuous manner, and in that connection he, the said defendant Mix, wrote the said presiding Judge, during the recess of the court and while lie was at chambers, an insulting and contcmntuous letter touchintr the nroceedines aforesaid, m which the said defendant Mix ticmanueu oi saiu presiuing duage at cnain bers, in an insulting, arrogant and contempt I uous manner, his authority for doing certain ! acts and things concerning the subject matter i of the order aforesaid and the proceedings had ! thereunder; and'it further appearing to the , court, that on the actual view and presence of the presiding" Judge hereof at chambers, j that the said defendant Mix, in contempt of the lawful order of this court so made as aforesaid, and in direct violation of the pow ers therein conferred upon him to act in said ... .1 I.t. T T T--1I ; auminisirauon conjomuy wmi iv. x. iveuey, did on the 11th day of December, A. D. lbi 1, at the town of Arizona City, in tho county of yuma anj Territory of Arizona, and at divcrs other times before that time, attempt D. Dob-1 to possess himeclf of the sum of fifteen hun tt Yuma , ,jrc(i dollars in the gold coin of the United States, said to belong to the estate aforesaid,- reconsideration of the premises, and the ano - 15 uereny uismissea irom wie oiiiuu ami trust conierrea upon conierrea upon mm ov tne oraer so made as aforesaid, and that hidesist from any further interference in the administration aforesaid, under the penalty of the law ; and it is further ordered that the matter of tlic administration of the estate of M. D. Dob bins, deceased, be remanded to the Probate Court of Yuma county with direction that f tin Tiir.fA ihnrpnf nt. tl.A pnrlififst. J.rnr.ticatlfi moment, proceed in the selection of some one " , .v : . or more suitable persons among the creditors of said estate, to administer thereon to the end that the same may be brought to a speedy settlement. I certify that the above is a true copy as ,takcn from the n-rtls e in my omce. r-OOHX W. DiinurvrTnv C51rlv. It. B. Kelley, Deputy Clerk.' Appeal to Supremo Court . In the District Court, 2d Judicial District, in and for the county of Yuma and Territory of Arizona. In the matter of tho order to show cause why A. A. Mix sbould not be dis- mtssea irora uis omce as Administrator ot the estate of M.D.Dobbins, deceased. To Isham Reavis, Judge of thc above nam ed court, and to .John W. Dorrington, Clerk thereof (jcntlemen : xou and each ot you are hereby notified that, thc undersigned ap peals to tho. Supreme Court of tins Territory from the order of the court dismissing A. A. Mix'from said office of Administrator of the .eateJof JC; J). Dobbins, deceased, and will re iv on. anneal noon tne racora oi ma cause. ak ,ypoa'tyi Bdavits of the raembcrs of J5r"S' to tae tmanner m -waichitwas tried, m also the affidavits of persons. who .were present in the Court-room. f " u A..J. MIX. SwccuDatafkrof tk, Cam. tiTerritorr 6f AriiK)D,couaty of Yqaa. ccraic and sworn,-Alfred Tha'iaid ; denied the KelleW wbica deciakm to the Dis- Govrfc, 2d JodtcUl ; TMatneal l1- J - - 4U.JItb letter from San Diego, signed Isham Bcavis, and addressed to Mix & Kelley, administra tors, &e., which letter is hereto" attached and marked exhibit A; and that subsequentlv, to-writ, on the 8th day of December, A. D. 1871, deponent wrote a letter to Hon. Isham Iteavis, as follows, a copy of which is now on file in my office as Public Administrator of Yuma county, Arizona Territory: Arizona Cjtv, A. T., Dec. 8, 1871. Sm: We arc in receipt of a letter from you, dated "San Diego," Nov. 17th, ordering us, without delay, to pay over to Steam Nav. Co. certain moneys "extorted" by M. D. Dobbins, deceased", from the said company ; also, we find on application to Hooper, Whit ing & Co. for moneys in their hands, a reply stating iu substance that you had given them a verbal order not to pay over any moneys in their hands belonging to the estate of M. D. Dobbins, deceased, to any one until so order ed by your court. Will you therefore inform us if you gave the above cited order, and if so, by what authority? and also please give us thc authority for issuing to us from San Diego, an order to pay any clain against said estate? An answer to the above will oblige. Yours, respectfully, A. A. Mix. To Hon. Isham Iteavis, present. Upon the date of said letter at about 2 i m., 11. B. Kelley called upon deponent and said that Judge Iteavis wished to see depo nent at the District Clerk's office, where upon deponent called on Judge Iteavis at the above indicated place ; that in a conversa tion with said Judge Iteavis, he, the said Judge, said in substance that thc detention of the funds in the hands of Hooper fc Co., was a mistake and intimated that it would be rectified, and in regard to thc money of S. Nav. Co.. that the same was due them, and said it was in effect as thc money were stolen, and they could follow it anywhere, which view tho deponent combattcd and opposed ; and deponent says that the Steam Nav. Co. have filed an account with deponent for the said money, which account has not as yet been acted upon by me as administrator nor by the Probate Court ; that subsequently, to wit, on the ninth day of December, A. D. 1871, deponcnti called upon Hooper & Co. for the funds in thVir hands belonging to the es tate of M. D. Dobbins, deceased, and that the said firm asked until evening to respond to the said demand ; that- on the said day, to-wit, Dec. 9, 18G1, in company with Clar ence Gray, his attorner, deponent called upon John S.'Carr, one of the aforesaid firnvof Wm. B. Hooper & Co., who handed ine, the deponent, a letter hereto annexed and marked exhibit "C that thereupon deponent took advice of his said atyorne, and the next da', or the day thereafter, deponent made a writ ten demand on the aforesaid linn for the said inoncy,.Q. wit,, fif im hundred dollars-; that the' said written demand was presented bv deponent to John S. Curr aforesaid, in com pany with iis said attorney; that at jhe time the same was presented, Judge lleavis was in the store of Hooper & Co. ; that upon reading the same, John S. Carr said in sub stance that he would reply to same, and sub sequently; on the 12th day of December, A. D. I87ljlthat deponent in company with his attorney called upon said John S. Carr, and thc said John S. Carr then and there deliv ered to deponent the letter hereto annexed and marked exhibit UD;" that on or about the 12th days of December, A. D. 1871, de ponent was served with a letter to show cause why ho should not be dismissed from his said office and be punished fgr contempt, a copy of which is hereto annexed and mark ed UE;" that upon being served with said notice, deponent, in company with his attor ney, Clurence Gray, called upon It.-B. Kel ley, Deputy District Clerk, at his office in Arizona City, and deponent's attorney asked the said Deputy for a copy of the complaint on which said order was made, and that the said Deputy replied that the order was all tho papers he had in the matter. Deponent further saytTthat at the time of the said ser vice and a long time before, the said, court was not in session ; that deponent has been in close attendance on thc said District Court since the samo has convened on the 25th day of December, A. D. 1871, until this day, and has not treated the Court with any contempt whatsoever, nor has deponent dis obeyed any legal order of said court ; that on thc 3d day of January, A. D. 1872, the court being then in session, deponent was called and appearing. Judge Iteavis said in substance as follows : Mr. Slix, you have been cited ,to appear to show cause why you should not be dismissed from your office of administrator of M. Q. Dobbins, deceased, and punished for contempt. At a previous term of this caurt yon were invested with a certain trust and have in a contemptuous manner disobeyed the order .ol the court. This contemptuous behavior of yours was in the personal view and knowledge of the Ceurt, and I shall deal - summarily with it. You are dismissed irom the trust of adminis trator of thc estate of M. D. Dobbins, deceased, and X will appoint some suitable person there- tor Should L.givc.you the lull penalty oi the jaw ji .rogue xo -punisu you, iurtuer. iou y OtOir. , - - Mmmomtmt further says that rrio opportunity any 'axpfca ti obs or say; a-word , . nor w ere anv qwwtkiyi ad him ; that he 'deprived w " wwij.m speccu, ana mat ine cotiauct tfJ&Witary rittftia lMrt'r; and Itart dmbcwitc aBftfc'-'feC;'-- n : S that bht from the . . TT3 BirvtrtUJtoetioo B cooaact w HTif hind put m ytii. ' ilU&Kelfy, Ac 4 .i Exhibit B.J Arizona City, A. T., Nov. 1G, 1871. Dr. A. A. Mix, Public Administrator of Yuma Co., Arizona City, A. T. Sir: Referring to your demand upon us for thc money due the estate of M. 1). Dob bins, deceased, from us, we beg to make the following statement : 1st. We are informed hy telegraphic dis patch from our House in San Francisco, un der date of October 2S, 1S71 as follows:' Bashford enjoins Dobbins' money. Claims fifteen hundred." l2d. Hon. Tsham Iteavis, Judge 2d Judi cial District Court of this Territory, ordered us, verbally, not to pay any moneys in our hands, belonging to the esta'te of M. D. Dob bins, deceased, until ordered to do so bv his Court. We would therefore state that we will write to His Honor Judge Reavis, bv the first mail to San Francisco, Cal.. and obtain his wishe?, in writing upon the subject. We stand ready and willing to pay thc amount due said estate by us at any time, and all we ask is to be allowed to obtain au thority in writing for our actions. Very respectfully, Src. W. B. Hooper & Co. Successors to Hooper, Whiting it Co. ExhilitC.J Arizona City, December 9, 1S71. Mr. A. A. Mix Sir: As your official con duct has already been, and will hereafter be, the subject of inquiry by tho Grand Jury of this county, you are directed to desist from further interferenre in the. administration of thc estate ofI.j.D. Dobbins, deceased, and fail not. Tbuam Rbavis, Dist. Judge. Exhibit D. Arizona City, A. T., Dec. 12, 18G1. A. A. Mix, Esq., Arizona City, A. T., Sir: In answer to.your demanp of December 11th, 1871, for amount of our due bill in 3our bauds, for money due the estate of M. I) Dob bins, deceased, that thc money should be im mediately paid to you, we would respectfully state that we have been ordered by His Hon or, Judge Iteavis, Judge of the second Judi cial District, to hold what funds we have in our hands belonging to said estate, until the next sitting of thc District Court. Respectfully, W. B. Hooper & Co. Supreme Court Review of the Case. Territory of Arizona appellee, vs. A. A. Mix, appellant: This i an appeal from tho final judgment of the Ciurt of the Second Judicial District of Arizona, upon Especial proceeding there in pending. jriicr transcript of tho re nl hi&(?oartr discJosos-wtho.-foUov ina state of facte iu tho case On the 8th of October, 1871, A. A. Mix the appellant, was by the Probate Court .' the county of Yuma, appointed special :a miniatrator of the estate of M. D. Dobbins then late of the said county, deceased: Sub sequently It. B. Kelly applied to the said Probate Court for appointment as administra tor of the same estate. This application was rejected and the said R. B. Kelly appealed to the District Court, for the judgment of re jection by the Probate Court, the said A. A. Mix being made appellee. That appeal, as the record alleges, was dismissed, and an or der entered by the said District Court, ap pointing both thc said It. B. Kelly and the said defendant Mix administrators, to act conjointly in the administration and settle ment of the said estate. bucu is the statement ot thc rccoru as shown by thc transcript. Subsequently, on the 25th of December, 1871, the said A. A. Mix was by the order of the said District Court, dismissed from the -administration o the saiu estate, tor uisoocYing, as tne record alleges, a lawful order of thc said Court, ad dressed to him as such administrator, as ap pears from the record itself. Upon this state of fucts tho appeal is made to this Court; and tho order of thc District Court dismissing the appellant A. A. Mix from the administration of the estate afore said, is the error alleged in the procedure of thc Court below, This case, like all special proceedings, is an unusual one, and tho facts disclosed by the transcript are " not so full as to exclude all conjecture. Enough, however, appears, to show this Court that the whole procedure below from the rejection of Kelly's applica tion for administration, by the Probate Court, to the dismissal, as it purports to be, of JMix by tho District Uourt, is one entire illegal procedure, and must be so regarded by this Court in its disposition of tho case, There is nothing on the record to show .thatMix was not doing his whole duty as administrator, at any time from the begin nlngto the end of this proceeding. Thc pre sumption of law regarding-administrators, as. well as other officials, is that they do their dutjr unui the contrary is shown The action of the district Court strongly aids this pre sumption, for instead of dismissing Mix on Kelly's appeal; if dismissed the Ajipcal itself &nu appomteauu .H&d tho District, Court stopped there, no pbssiblq exception, could have been taken to its action, xno recoru, uowever, went mucu further than this, for it appointed lioth Mix and Kelly co-admirnstratori. and at last dis- mfcacdtMix from the adniihistrationfordis- obeyior one of its orders. The character of tfie? order disobeyed, w jnof however, stated ihftBtranript,9 and .the presumption of law wodf liiilrba'ihits faror against an ad- minHtratwwaoseppointnKjnt and direction must come-from another Csart having a pri ,Birj;JurisdictioR exdasiveljr. Its owb which tho hstricfc f TaVopimon of, this Court is thatevery- jncdoneby t lie D is triot' Co ti rt in this case, after the ditwissal of Kellys appcalr w :itii;autlrityf hwnd therefore nail M$,Torai ttatTfromti01 that appears bj'the iSforAAt Mix is still the sole attUd'rtlM estate of M, iitSe: Probate CllrfwTi - -f.Ahlil . M Vaimf " :r- ceased ; that A. A. Mix, or whoever is or may be appointed administrator of the said estate by the Probate Court of Yuma county, be allowed to administer such estate as the law directs; and that thc Clerk of this Court certify this order to the said District Court. John Titos, C. J. I concur, Twuto, Associate Justice. More Affidavits. Territory of Arizona, county of Yuma m. Before A. A. Mix, J. P., in and for First Township. Dionicio Corella being first duly sw'oni, deposes and says : I am the prose cuting and principal witness in the case of lenitory vs. Isiac Lyons, the preparatory examination of which was held before Jti tice H. E. Lindsay. The defendant Lyons was accused ot and did wound and other wise maltreat deponent by hhootinghim with a pistol. 1 do not know that the case has ever been presented to the Grand Jury or tried by any other court, except that men tioncd as above stated, C. W. C. Rowell, who was then acting District Attorney, agreed with me to compromise the crime above set forth. Mr. Rowell informed me that the mat ter relating to this crime could be compro mised for four bundled and fifty dollars of which, he said, I would receive two hundred dollars. One hundred ami fifty was to be paid for medical attendance on me during the time I was confined on account of the wound received, and one hundred dollars Mr. Row ell to receive for his services. I have since paid the one hundred and fifty dollars doc tor's bill, and I understand I am now to re ceive three hundred and fifty dollars. I have never been paid any money. Mj share of the compromise or the money that was to be paid for the settlement of the above mentioned crime was to be paid in ninety days from tlo date of the compromise. Mr Rowell told me that he had received the note of the defend ant Lyons for four hundred and fifty dollars. I understood that one Dr. A. A. Mix and It. B. Kelle' were sureties on the note. I am a man ignoraut of the law relating to crimi nal prosecutions, and would not have entered into this compromise if I had known it to be in violation of law. Dionicio Coiieli.a. Subscribed and sworn to before me this the 20th day of Januarv, 1872. A. A. Mix, J. P., 1st Township, Yuma Co., A. T. Territory of Arizona, county of Yuma sr. Before A. A. Mix, J. P. First Township, A. T. Luis Campa being first duly sworn, de poses and says : I know of the case ot the Territory vs. Isaac Lyons, thc preliminary ovaniiiiation of which was held before H. L. Lindsev, J. P, on thc day of June, 1871,1 aildbaMnaiwhichkirofofWit'to-iirthe am- j , v.. Ml j davit of Diomcio Corolla, made before Jwco t ' Mix on the 20th dav of January. A. IK 1S2. iic defendant Lyon shot and wounded me ! .ii the same time that he shot and wounded J Dionicio Corella. I know nothing of the j compromise of the crime. I have paid the ; one hundred and fifty dollars to Dr. Decorse and Geo. Tyng. I have paid the one hun dred and fifty dollars above specified, because Judge Isham Reavis ordered me to pay it. I paid it because Judge Iteavis told me iff did not pay it iu two hours, he would put me in jail. I paid the money, that is all that I know about the matter. I had made an ar rangement with Dr. Decorse to pay this money in three months previous to the order of Judge Reavis. Dr. Decorse did not sue for thc moile', and I paid it on the ground or because I was afraid he would put me in jail. I was standing in the Court-room wit nessing the business transactions of the court when he, Judge Reavis, spoke to me in refer ence to thc payment of the one hundred and fifty dollars to Dr. Decorse; he commanded me in an angry and boisterous manner to pay it within two hours or he would put me in jail. I was put to a great deal of trouble in getting the money to pay Decorse. I had to borrow it. UIS Luis x Campa, mark. Subscribed to and sworn before me, this thc 20th day of January, 1872. A. A, Mix, J. P., 1st Township, Yuma County, A.T. Ax EvniiELY Xr.w "L.ir-ouT" ok Groceries, Prorisions, Fresh and Dried Fruits, Tobacco, Cigars, Pipes, Notions, Etc., I not? offered thc people of rrcscott and Ticlnltjr, by MEJLVIN & McFOSTER, (At OKjlrSloro, In tho Old Capitol, Building:,) Tlicr hare nine, frwli Ifoncy, Bttttfr, IJaron, Uamn, Lnnl, NuU, Candiw, and several other good things which they aro sclliofr ery cljctiri to inewu ana joc. I'rescott, July itsn. IX IS NO JOKE. Vfifwilhstandtnr ihn doll times, hot 'nreatber. aad IumiB Indiaa, genUeawa can fiad, tR-o doe Berth ef D'. Ilea dereoa fc IIro' Cro-prwftTe, COUIFOItTAJJIrE. BEDS, PRIVATE ROOMS, i .-n i Otrrrrr Pr rtr t v Wtirt. rv.. r '3 A.- AJ IV XtiVV Also. Worm and O&'Ba&L at. ll W u.i'i'Ui aBd evening - , X. E. MMMTT. PQOK Amy in '4Z ' I.AM - A. JUKI MMR 'ir nil I. iHh DtU, Business & Professional Cards. THOMAS CORDIS, TJ. S. Collector of Internal Kcvenne. OMe Sunt d of Plura, lrcott COLES BASHFORD, ATTORN F,Y and eOUNSELOR.AT-L.AW, Tuoon, -Art-XBHR, HARLEY H. OARTTER, ATTORN IS Y and nrNSF,LOR-ATliAW Prcscott, Yuvnjuvl county, ArlxonA. Will att-wl Ui lyufcMiM lnivatM Mtttta .if tt Territory . J. l H All GRAVIS, ATTORNEY and COUNSILOR-AOVtAW, Montezuma street, Vroteott, A risen a. JOITiV HOWARD, ATTORNEY and COUNSKL0R-A.T-LAW Prwcott, Ariaoir.i. J. E. MeCAFFRY, ATTORNEY and COLTNSKLORAT-kAW Jlnln Strnct, Tuuun, A, T. O. U. CASH, CIVIL S 3NT O X 1ST ;i3 S3 IR, United States Dapty Mineral Surveyor. Preswnt, Ariemial 1 I. Q. DICKASOIV, U. S. MA USUAL FOR ARIZONA. Ollce at Voouniilc. op3CTL J. K. McCANDLESS, PHYSICIAN AND SURGEON, Office, A'orth Slilr of I'Jaxu, l'rrxcott. HEARY W. FLEURY. PROBATE JUDGE & NOTARY PUBLIC. Oflec aejet lw to Dr. StcCmHoj. WM. A. HAtfCOCK NotaTy Public and Conveyancer. Blank n r-1 t tmt-hLa .. ... -.,- . - ... , ... JT , ; J. ir. BRADS HAW. A. K. DAVIS N. SHECKLP.S BRADSHAWITES ! DAVIS & SHECKLES Are prppwixl to funiuli y, h (Mt ttun In DralUtam City, with all Muds ef EATABLES, DRINKABLES, AND "WEARABLES At Very Low l'rkas fdr dish. Girt aa a Trial ovu w.vrcifwoju : -A. Grootl j&.r&iol. SmtiU J?i-ofltiw mid MILLER & JJUSSEY Have urtw t gitm. ami tor ml nt BEADSHAW CITY, The largctt, Imt aiworti'U fppty, f , Groceries, Provisions Clothing, DryQoodf, Farming and 31injng Implomori Powder, Fuse, Guns, Pistols, Building Materials, Ac, &c.r ... -ETcr op.cdln the Bradhha-jreglua, and arc.Mainhip. " for chnh. SiUf BEMAIiDJffiO. ISAAC H. LEVY Dealer in General Merchandise, and General Commission Merchant; San Bernardino, California 3Icrchantli fonranlctl to any part ffJiArfJiniti?iU promptaw and dopata. K menU, 1 .j.-s. Office - V Stmu L N'tl 1 lAmtmr corner i Tu Saa Utt tKjw. Am n i n 1 . . j. LOS AXU) L.1ZAUO 4t CO. DRY GOOftff .M CUrtlffSSG, ' Mto. Hrsesyjlnles3 and Oxea:Sh cen-Shod, toXERBROS. llAJSfh: - Hi I ; f 1 i. i i 1 j r m i