Newspaper Page Text
(jjjMM2222staKsSsHE2!3!'',sGZ
.
EVENING nULI.KTIN. HONOLULU. T. II., WEDNESDAY. APR. 8, 1908.
lbcu omm m
Great Industries -And
Genera! Prosperity
Threatened
WHITNEY & MARSH
TIIORGlirili DISCUSSION OF
COUNTRY'S GHEAT PROBLEM
Wc have received just in time for Easter n NEW SE
LECTION OF
Ladies' White Skirts
Good and Bad Men To Be Found Ev
erywhere Why Condemn
Good for Evil Bone
by Bad?
Lei mo snj U Hit' cold oj fil hoblij
ililor who can look with ttars upon
cif distress and without tli.uln of
reason iiihiu another Mini thai Ibis
Is no appeal for the peipcluatinii of
Immorality: neither Ih It an excuse
for any kind of ilopraili.v. Let nit
say to the one-sided half thoughtful
people who maintain that murnlitj l
n quality of the hiiiii.ui being mined
by external foico Iii8trr.il of liit-ni.il
collection, that the no-called temper
aneo inurement, which seems to Inue
ciuiylit tliu "Ijnch-ciy" "f thousands.
Ih the most lntempi ranee furor that
has for decades threatened ihe dearly
nciiulicil rights of American citizen
ship. That most of the laws pasted b
out legislature In answer to Ihe tie
iirmd of highly-paid loadcis and frau
tic lohtnlsts for this fad, niu palpa
ble liuarltms of tho established prin
ciples of human light Is an uuquali-
lied truth.
The personal and proptit.i rights
of the citizens of many states have
been Invaded In direct rouuavcntloti
to tho purpose of our constitutional
liicnsmcB to piotcct them Tho peo
ple of this country Ium' conceded
many Incursions upon the premises
nt their peisonnl rights, ns legally
ilcflned, and have remained passive
fiom tho lncepllon of a bad law until
Hinio notable Incident secured Its re
peal, but while tho lndlldunls will
often permit tho loss of some minor
right as to personal conduct he will
Instantly nssunio tho ugKrossho In
defense of his property rights. Our
laws, as respects properly rights, arc
more closely followed, mainly hccaiibo
I M
rgKBHBB
Mil
IN
Siik and Voile
NO DUPLICATES.
Waist measurements up to 32, Also
New White Petticoats
In regular and train 1 cngths.
.ij l nuk' A.1-U.IW ljiijuu.'uii "
M-sj'-Lum mimv j. i:,"Lj-azazTm
111 the personnel of our onice holders, necessity true, their plan of harassing
but this, Is the first minetneiit which legitimate commerce- Willi laws which
has attempted reform and morality nro productive or Injury generally to
by Indirect robbery. tho basic principle of property and
If Ihe constitution of tho United personal rights, would bring greater
States explicitly states: "Nor shall damage to tho body politic than nil
private property bo taken for public the Inebriates now extant, or wliclh
ue without Jut compensation." what would be, under any laws, hereafter,
excuse have tho exponents of Shell IT- llesldes, prohibition him been beyond
made Morality" for not cmho.l lug In question, 'proven to bo a failure. Tho
their local option bills n prols!on to comparison or a saloon, properly con-
pay Tor the properly which they seek ducted and well legulaled with the
to destrov? U local opllon thai in i.v dlity "boot-legs" and "spcak-easles"
put peoplo out of business and lender of prohibition states, where the open
their propel ty useless Is mil for Ihe temperate thinking or inlld-beer and
public service, then It Is unworthy puro beverages has been tronsfornieil
the consideration of any puli'le her- Into "sneak" Indulgence In cheap
vant or voter exercising his duiv tn whisky, Is nil that Is required to con-
the public. If local option Is really unco tho most skeptical,
for the public ncrvlco or live and The zealots of this alleged temper-
pioperty Is thereby tlostrood, let Ih" unco cause have gone so tar beyond
public pay for It and exemplify the tho limits of fairness anil decency In
fair spirit that these temperance list- their assaults upon the principles of
tnlors prefers. Tho pliln truth Is personal rights lh.it It Teems all roa-
that this Is icform run nniucl; and Min has forsaken them. "Unreason-
heedless or any that may bo Injured able searches and rclzures" have been
so long ns tho leadeis. In their blind made and "erne,! and unjust punish-
real, may. try an experiment In one incuts" have nm rampant In stales
state that has proven rutllo In other , where tho mania or temperance fnnu-
states. Our legislatures have been tlclsm has secured so strong a hold
..II In.. ...Illlni. In Mm.t tww tit!illlti. ' thnt tlli'Hi. rfinst It lllloUlll SnfegliardS
tho elder aim or most or our citizens wl(h ft tanRo ()t U1UE0 ,.Mlormont,M invu i,Cen entirely Ignored, and tho
Is the acquirement .of piopprty, anil )nwg Tlu,ru an, R(miH wi, aro not so Individuals has suflcrcd scrloiiB ah-
mis uniiornuiy oi purin.-e "" ZOalous Tor the public good ns they rldgmcnt or his rights througti ignor
resect for each ethers rights of this nr() t) )Cr.,uUlaU, i,1Cratlu' positions anco or 'his remedy or lack or means
class and a better understanding (it nn,i, ,,f .i,ia mnxci.ient. with to nurBue It through tho courts.
nothing to lose but a good Job on their i Tho Torco of contracts has often
i lile, while the business Intciests loae been Impaired and ,tho progress or
millions on the other ride. 'commeice, wjilch must plan ahead,
Theie are others who court tho M'as been delayed anil hampered nj
them
Considering the universal under
standing, how Is It p -1 ' ' inr a mm,
who would scorn to steal or wrong
fully deprlM a:i"tlu - "f hi- pr .ori,
lo ndvotatu a law .vh.c'i unlustly con
fiscate!, let; tl'nrtelj acquired wealth
from pr.it or our citizens and pioposu
no couipeiibiitlon theiefor?
No government which rails to safe
'gtiaid. In eery particular, tho rights
of i', citizens to tho peaceable pos
session of property and the unmolest
ed onjnjment thereof, could oer hope
for continuous national existence n.
tho trannuilltj which our nepubllc
S'-J undcaturs to promote. This Is a truth
li" miilniiiliieil bv ibo blood of tho foun
ders or these free states, and for
which all the power and principles of
their union operate.
AbIiIo from the collection of debts,
there Is, In Ihe entire scheme ot our
organic l'iw. but one piocess by
which a citizen can forcibly bo dis
possessed of his pioperty. This Is
tho privilege rchencd by tho govern
ment, known as tho "Itight of Emi
nent Domain," under which resit lc-
.i tlon all property held by tho Individ-
P ..... ..,. ... I. I -til.. ..f
uai is biiiijeeieii i". it i" in" irt.
the Blnto to forciblj take property
Tor public uso or service. Hut before
this can bu done It must bo clearly
established thai the sen leu to tho
public In quest Ion Is of bonnlldu
value. Then u fair appralsul of tho
value of the pioperty taken Ib made
subject to review l court coiumls
klonera and tho state must pas over
to tho owner this compensation lor
tho loss he sustains. 'Ihe fairness
of tho nroceiluio Ib not denied.
Hut wlmt of the system In' which
tho ugltators or prohibitory menfrjires
expect to Indirectly confiscate mil
lions or dollars of pioperty In this,
country fiom the brewers and saloon
keepers and pay nothing for It? Isn't
it highly probablo Unit eventually tho
courts will afford roller to the owners
or this pioperty? It ceitalnly would
bo nothing short of Justice that It
should bo paid for. Tho owner or a
brewery, which by icason or un
reasoning temperance legislation Is
lima rendered useless ror the nowod
purpose or benefiting (?) tho public,
should collect In full for his loss
from tho tn payers.
Tho loss to him Ib tho snmo wheth
er It bo ono law or another which
npeintos to deprive him of the nlue
of his property. A browery, liming
, been built for a special purpose, Is
useful only ns such, and to dcprlva
tho owner of the light to employ It
In tho only way It can bo of hoi Ice
to him Is to dopilvo him or hlo prop,
erty Is lrtually dispossession.
When we proclaim the gieat pi In
dole or nronerty rights, nro wo lo
infer that ono Hubs of property Is to
bo deprived of nnd another class of
property subject to the protection oi
tho vaunted square deal that this
government la supposed to give every
one? If thin system of Invasion of
property rights proposed by present
tempernnco legislation Is to bo ap
plied now to ono class or property,
whero will tho application cease and
how soon will somo other class or
property be under tho ban or Ihe
next popular rail, tnlhiuimed rerorm?
Wo hiuo hud iiuniPlous lelorm moo
nient's which presumed to produco
footlights and arc chronic gallery
paci-8 that noor know what it was
to thiead the tlolous ways or com
petition In commerce, but can talk
well and depend upon a popular ob
ject or attack to perpctuato tticl.
tho creation or clogging uncertainty
reaching out Into every nvenuo of
trade; touch tho plans or tho cry
government ItBeir, or who?o rovenuo
this traffic forms so formidable a
part. A transfer or tho burdon which
..., ... g..v.... ...... - , . ,. .... ... ..,..
notoriety. There nro some who arc mis irainc m u ruvi-miu ... ...,
honest In their contentions, bat are county anil nation cairles. to tho
ton selfish to consider consoquenco to hacks of tho tax-payers of this ctiim-
nfi,i. nn.i .mi nniplentlr nnifniinil try. would bring home to them too
m renrh Lni-nnil hvsterl.i and linnmc-.lato the facts they Bhould think about
tlcablllty. Ilehind these conio tho
many that follow nnd do not think.
They have not thought, and it would
bo difficult to get them to think, about
the nlue of tho established rights or
pilvnte property In this country, ox
cent It bhould haiinen to bo their
pioperty. Not many o thcin own j
browericB or saloon property, and tho
lull rorco of tho consequence of their
votes on this subject Is not brought
now, while the people nro facing this
ruinous crusade. No Individual how
ever small his means or unimportant
his occupation, could hope to cscapo
the seilous conscquenccB or tho loss
or tills commerce. That such a mam
moth revolution or business condi
tions would save anything by reduc
ing ciituo or lessening tho number ot
penal Institutions Is a fallacious con
jecture only.
homo to them. They rarely think of To the moral sldo or this question
the fnr-reachlng harm of a dangerous , tnoro can uo limiting inn. ino mauei
pteeedent and their education as lo
facts idles almost wholly upon the
assertions and (ligaments of a prej
udiced pulpit that would do more
good In the field of moral persuasion
than In Its support or liberty threaten
ing laws which aro plainly a pervoi
slon or Justice nnd can only anger
tho spirit ot American freedom, which
denies the right, oven of law, to thus
curtail our privilege.
This actuates, every American, but,
unfortunately, it bcems that It Is
Housed usually only after It Is too
Into ror him to consider that tho
riElil or others and his own are unit
ed by Indissoluble lies, and that In
piotoct his neighbor Is to protect
blniKeir. This spirit can contemplate
no honor In wricking a mammoth in-
of personal volition nnd the proper
conduct ot tho business. Neither tho
hrowcis nor 'ninety per cent or tho
saloonkeepers objoct to regulation;
In tact, they courl It and urge It that
tho very few who have been reckless
anil defiant InW and order breakers
may no longer servo for tho basis of
unfair and unrighteous condemnation
of them all. Whllo regulation of any
business to conform with decency and
public propriety Is desirable, tho man
ner In which most of tho temperance
ncniilo who do not beliovo In prohi
bition hut do dcslro regulation would
carry it out amounts practically to
prohibition.
If a tax on the retail business Is
mndo so high that tho dealer cannot
make iuonej.lt Is nothing shoit of pro-
dnstrv. in taking away tho fruits of i hlbltion: Is productive or financial
toll mid enterprise from any man, iio Ulstiess, and nny man driven Into a
matter how much ho may have been cornor has less respect for tho law
traduced and maligned by IiIb one- than when lie Is prosperous. Hcnco,
hilcs whoso calumnies havo reached tho regulation enrrled to an extreme
no bounds In tho hato nnd venom , encourages tho Incentive to tnko Ions
poured upon tho heads of tho makers chances to keep from sinking In tho
end Boilers or beer.
This Amcitcnn spirit, which loves
fair play should bo Insulted nt Ihe
nroiiosltion to ruin this mormons
commeico upon so flimsy a pretext
that It Is moral so to do, or that It
denths of rnlluro and buslnesB disas
ter, ir this Is really a light ror morals
a license should bo Issued on a basis
or moral qualifications ami a lair lax
only.
This would bo tho rational way it)
rmronrnoes morality among that very sottlo tho matter, all but leaving to
smnll proportion of our population Mho Individual the question of whether
which lacks tho will-power to refrain 'or not ho shall drink. It'ts us absurd
from personal dcgraditlon. Not over Mo mako a law to compel a man to
mm in nun thousand of our iiouiila-1 icf rain from drinking beer as to coin
tlon nro drunkards. Rut wo aro alii pel him to refrain rrom eating. How
asked ror tho sake or this ono-tenth
ot ono per cent of our peoplo to wreck
commerce, lilungo irillllons of iiien
and money Into competition with
other lines of trade and labor; mako
lillo over four million acrps or rami
land tilled by over ono hundred thou
sand farmers curtail the output of
tho mines and mine labor that sup
plies tho machinery for about threo
thousand largo plantB In tills country;
curtail tho products and labor'of glas3
factories, Jumber mills, supply com
panies, coal mines, and n thoiisnnd
other lines or trade where men toll
and capital has wrought to products
In produce happiness and coinfoit for
millions or fumlllen who are all inoro
or less dependant upon tho Mowing
foolish, how potty, ror Inw to pro-
sumo to choose a man's drink for
him. If Inw stipulates what ho shall
drink, why not what ho shall eat,
Too much of elthor will harm him.
A wise government treats personal
rights dellcatoly and gives tho In
dividual as wide a range of privilege
as possible.
It should bo linnecussary to assert
that In tho matter of taking a drink
or not, the will of tho Individual
should lm supreme. If ho drinks so
much that he becomes a mennco lo
society and useloss to himself, lot
the punishment be on him; not up
on the men who raise the bailey, the
corn or the hops. If the "root and
liinnch" cry moana anything, why not
hops nnd rice? Ilegln at the root, so
to speak, These farmers, once coin
polled to cease raising these grains,
there would bo no mnro beer nnd In
loxlcantti, Hut inturo has prepared
many wnj's to produce natural nnd
nrtlflclnl fond nnd drink tar ns, romo
of which Is not no good for us ns the
icrt. and It e.innot seem anything but
toollsh to icly iiion law liiBtend ;f
iiei-Hiinsltiii nnd nrlicral tutelage til
show the .vouth or this world whnt Is
good and what Is bad.
After they have been taught, then
It Is a matter of their own will power
nnd moral force. Moderation, tem
perance, In all things, marks tho man
-tho real mnn. He requires no hand
made laws to guide him to the right
or enforce choice of nature's food or
di Ink when ho Is hungry or thlrstj'.
If the imlf mnn. the unbalanced weak
ling, should fall to chooso wisely Jn
kind or quantity nnd thereby be led
to commit n misdemeanor, ho should
bo mmlshed. Not that law hates or
seeks vengeance, but that law must
protect the rest who nao cnosen
moro wlsclj-. The fault lies In tho
abuse, and law punishes. Why
bhould Inw restrict or punish those
who do not misuse or abuse? If It Is
not right to punish the millions ot
neonlo who uso h'icr moderately, by
what process of reasoning should wo
punish those who make If for or hell
It to them? It Is plain mat a saloon
keeper Ih culpable when be Bells li
quor to nn Irresponsible pel son whom
ho knows habitually debauches him
self nud endangers Ibo peace of the
rominunlly, but Micro nro many sn
loonkeepcrs who will not do this,
Thero nro many saloonkeepers who
aro regular attendants at church nnd
moro devout Christians than most of
their traducors who may sneer nt thlB
stutenicnt hut who can only bo oi
that class who do no lincstlgatlng.
A largo majority or them nio good
citizens nnd educate their children
to bo temperate nnd honorable; rar
better citizens, In Tact, than those
who misrepresent tacts to the degree
ot nbsoluto falsehood, than thoso
who, In tho bitterness or their nttack.
uso invectlvo and vituperation
against them and paint tho worst of
thcin blacker than they arc.
Of course, there are had saloon
keepers. Hut whnt ralrncss Is theie
In n proiK-tltlon to punish all or them,
tho good nB well ns the bad, by de
priving them or the fruits or moir in
dustry, by confiscating their busi
ness? There nro moro saloonkeepers
than almost any other class of busi
ness men, nnd It Is small wonder that
i-onio aro bad. Hut oven they work
less harm to tho community than
would a law which piinlshcn tho In
nocent. Asldo from tho palpable In
justice of such n codo of punishment,
I hold thnt It Is an nbsuidly wrong
nnd unlust principle to give ono man
the right to voto another man out of
business. In other words, Locul Op
tion Is a powci" which should not be
glen to tho Voter. Taking nway a
man's property' Is plainly n judicial
question that calls for careful delib
eration. Our people arc engaged In
ninny kinds nf business and human
selfishness does' not encourage a Judi
cial frame of mind In tho voter when
ho votes to abolish another man s In
come. The majority rulo means much
In this countrj-. but It docs not mean
that wo should allow tho average vot
er to act as both accuser and Judge.
Would wo allow tho prejudiced peo
ple who uto on Local Option to set
on n Jury to decide this question? lle
sldes, the rulo or tho majority con
templates Justlco to everybody, and
does not Intend oppression to tho
minority
Too much liquor harms; too much
tight lacing harms; too much corn
heef nnd cnbbagn harms, and so on
down tho lino. Why not suppress tho
beller of vegetables and the farmer
who grows them? Why not suppress
the corset maker as well. It Is not a
mutter of suppressing any ono. It Is
hlmply up to tho people not to mnko
fools of themselves In tho uso or what
Rod glics them fo- necessities or
pleasures. Some peoplo do not want
beer and somo do not want corsets,
and with these, whobo "ox Is not
gored," tho tearful dovotces of tho
prevailing fad find their con.crts.
Ono who lias heard llttlo ovldenco
In the case,- none of It under oath,
goes to tho polls nnd decides to put
mother man out of business; votes to
provent Jones from selling Hrown
what he Is willing to buy. Is It not
reasonable tn say that this Is too
much voting? All business In this
country Is under tho control of law,
and should so be, but tho recent
financial panic seems to tcacli us that
law should give conimoico, nt least
half jhe road, Tho eternal, luhuttato
dry of mllienliini mnliers ror moro and
yet more law to rcgulato any Kind oi
commerce to Its death, Is tho thing
thnt most requires suppression In tills
country If suppression must bo.
Suppress the bad beef and rood
ECllcrs, but not. tho good ones. Sup
press the bnd corporations, but not
the good ones. Suppress tho bad
saloons, but not tho good ones. Isn't
this a moro rcabonablo proposltlou
than to suppress them all. Any move
ment to suppress nil, regardless or
character, Is tank radicalism consti
tuting a posltlvo mennco to society.
Local Option to suppress by popular
voto any legitimate business cannot
but woik harm to tho community, Tho
saloon Is a legitimate business place
and ull codes or law or morality must
admit it. That It Is somctlmos con
ducted illegitimately argues nothing
to support the wild assumption that
all should be driven from business.
Any Judge or voter, and by the Local
j
lUYBlIU BEimBEUi
THEIfc ADVENTURES IN WU.L STftEEIt
'
day.UMuc&HkiitUiy' '
An wvrylax about ttMmci of
Hlm-Pront-loway,
Who's Introduced In Washington ,
More the House ol Reps.,'
The flfty-oents-a-share till (A,
Wallstntfllknowas Hep'ti
4
It seems to me, says Billy Bull,
that Hepburn Is all wrong,
Unless tor Montreal a boom he
wants to help along
'Cause thats where we will go
to trade, lust to save the tax.
It with favor on his arguments
Congress ever acts.
s z
It worries me, says Berth' Bear,
lust as much as you, v
'Cause I'd have to goto London
' (o put all my trading through,
And I must say Wall streets
better torattemptlngsueb a
.trick.
T em k? P Bea,use ,a stormy weather water
lrn WWfl JV aVAt
IV.
5o 6of7i agree that Hepburn, It
he gets his tax bill through,
Will give the trains and steam
ships lots and lots ot things
todo
And with Wall street going to
England they are both In-
dined to think,
The Stock Exchange n.'t;t wctl
be turned Into skating rink.
I 4ffL
Jm.i
.
G-.-W -r.
.. --
jHtV&frio-Jljr
Izens should bo adjudicated by tho
voter In tho heat id n campaign wheio
fuels aro distorted and prejudice rules
supremo.
Thero nro ninny principles of gov
ernment which could not bo nnd nro
not entrusted to a general otlng con
test, and this Is ono thut should not be
bo decided. Tho "right ot lUo, liberty,
and the pursuit of happiness," Is u
maxim which bears no "rough-house"
Juggling, and tho question of tho con
fiscation of property, by any process
whatever, directly or Indirectly.
should not bo tossed Into tho moleo
of u general election, contest and left
to tho tender mercies or the voters.
Thn wholo "roico" Idea or this ques
tion Is thuiotighly, unqualifiedly
w rung.
it us brine un our children under
Jhe Influence or right persuasion and
make them good men nnu women no
cTiuso or tho volco of real manhood
and real womanhood spoaklni; from
tholr Innor consciousness, and not
treat them to tho huriilllntiiig Bpec
taclo of a futile attempt lo coerco thu
futuro generations into honor with the
iash of tho law.
NEW TO-DAY
Option rulo voters aro all Judges, who
woffld Indiscriminately punish tho
good for the shortcomings of tho bad,
falls to appreciate tho principles of
this rreo government from which he
expects piotectloii himself.
Local Option has placed an entirely
unusual power In the hands ot the
witoi which makes him superior to
tho promlsos of the constitution or tho
United States, and enables him to re
peal the guarantee which this govern
ment has for ono hundred and twenty
jearn put forward an a protection to
all. I hold that un question that in
hk y -r
fn
sU4 ''-
1G, 10, 24
Sho: Shakespeare says man has
sovon uges.
Ho: A woman has only three.
She: Whnt aro they?
t He: Blxteon, nineteen and twonty-
rour.
Other Arcndlnu condltlou by u ehniiee luteiests for their piospeilty. moral ubolUh corn, ije, bailoy, potatoes, olves so much Important to our clt-
il i..a,ll .Ato MhMll)AteMMa ,.A.
A BENEFACTOR OF HUMANITY
"Has your husband ever done any
thing to bonellt his tollow mnn?"
"I should say so! If he hud had
hair his original excuses ror getting
home late copyilghtcd he'd bo In thn
mllllonalro class now." IIoiiBtnii
I'ost.
No. 138. TKIttUTOKY OF HAWAII.
COURT OK LAND IlEQISTltATION.
TKIUUTOftY OK HAWAII TO L. L.
COOKB Trustco; CECIL HHOWN
Trusteo; CAUItIB B. OKOCKBTT;
OKOIIOB HBNDBHSON'; WALTER
COOMIISi MRS. ARVILLA S. Mr
WAYNBi MARSDEN CAMI'HBLL;
CHARLES II. SMITH; Mrs. SEL
MA S. KINNEY: Mrs. DIXIK V.
OWEN; JOSEPH QUINTAL; EM
ILY C. JUDD: JULIET- .IUD1)
SWANZY; BM1LY PAUAIIl
JUDO; CHARLES II. JUDD Jr.;
TERRITORY of HAWAII by C. It.
HEMENWAY ns Attorney .Gener
al: COUNTY of OAIIU by
CHARLES HUSTACB Jr. as Chair
man of tho Board of SupcrVlsois;
and to ALL whom It may concern:
Whereas, n petition has bcon pre
sented to "said Court liy.niKDERICK
C. MILLER to register and confirm
his tltlo In tho following-described
land:
lleginnlng at a point on tho Bast
sldo" of.Mnklkl Stieot from whlell
point the Government Street Monu
ment nt tho S. W. Corner of Mitklki
and Kowowchl Btrocts bears, by truo
azimuth, 205 BO',. 184.8 feet, unci
running as follows, by truo azi
' (1) 318" 09', 10S.8 feot, along
fence Lot 75;
(2) 44 10', ,149.0 feett, ulong
fcnco,Lots 69 and 68;
. Jf,3) 318 10', 14.6 feet, nflong
,f tonco Lot 68;
(4) 48" BO', 75.0 feot, along foncu
Lot 67;
' (5) 138' 16'. 115.0 foot', nlong
Domlnis Street to Mnklkl St.';'
(6) 223 3C', 225.0 feet, along
Mnklkl Street to tho Initial
point; , v
Containing an area ot 25015
Square Feot, n llttlo more or less,
being; a portion of I,'. C. A, 821,1,
Sec. 2, Apnna 2, to John II; and
known as Lots 76, 77, 78 and a por
tion ot 67, of the Anapunt Sub-division;
on tho South East side ot Mn
klkl Street, Pawaa, Honolulu, Oahu.
You are hereby cited to appear nt
the Court of Land Registration, to
bo held nt Honolulu, Island ot Oahu,
on the 8th day ot Juno, A. D l.o,
nt one o'clock and thirty minutes in
the afternoon, lo show rniihe, If uuy
jou have, why tho prayer or Bald
unless you appear at Bald Court at
tho' time nnd place alorosatd your de
fault will be recorded, and tho sulci
petition will bo taken as conrcBsed,
and you will bo forover barred from
contesting said petition or any decreo
entered thereon.
Witness, lMIILIP L. WEAVER. Ks
quire. Judge ot said Court, thU km
day or April In the year nlnetce
hundred and eight.
Attest with Seal ot said Court.
(Scnl) W. L. HOWARD,
Registrar.
3!71 Apr. 8, 15, 22, 29.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
First Circuit, Territory of Hawaii. At
Chambers; in Probate, In tho Mat
ter of tho Estate ot Stuart Porten
Hurnlngham, Deceased. Order of
Notlco of Hearing Petition for Ad
ministration. On" reading and flllnif
tho petition of Thomas A. Uurnlng
ham, or Honolulu, Oahu, Territory of
Hawiill, alleging that Stuart Porten
Hurnliighniri of Honolulu, Oahu, Ter
ritory ot Hawaii, died lntcstato at
Tempo, Stato of Arizona, on the 26th
day of Uoccmber, A. D. 1907, leav
ing property In tho Territory of Ha
waii noccsfiary to bo ndmlhtsterod
lipnttfjuid' praying that letters of ad
Yntnlstratldh Issuo to him, It Is or
dered that Mondaj', the 11th 'day ot
May, A. D. 1908, at 9 o'clock a. m..
bo and hcroby Is appointed-tor hear
ing said petition In tho court room
of this court nt said Honolulu, nt
which time and place all persons con
cerned may appear and show cause,
If any thoy have, why said petition
should not ho granted, and that no
tlco of this order shall bo published
onco a weok for threo successive
weeks In tho Evening Bulletin, u
nowspappr publlshod In Honolulu
aforesaid,'
Dated nt Honolulu, April 7th, 1908.
ALEXANDER LINDSAY, JR..
2nd Judge or tho Circuit Court ot
the First Circuit.
Attest:
JOHN MARCALLINO, Clerk.
3971 Apr. 8, 15, 22, 29.
FOR SALE
4000 Oreen Roofing Blate 10"xl6".
600 One nnd Two Prong Iron Fence
Posts.
1 25-gallon Drum Commercial Eth
er, i M
1 .Castlron Fitting with Flanges,
for IS" Wrought Plpo.
ri ittiKiiliTiiiii'iiiiiifi j! ' imkimMMiaWmiMmaWMi 1 1 iiiiii"irfiilfei in i
EMMELUTII & CO.. LTD..
potltlon should not bo granted. And j 145 Kjng street. Phone 211,
',aiyi$a(teft&
I
