Search America's historic newspaper pages from 1789-1924 or use the U.S. Newspaper Directory to find information about American newspapers published between 1690-present. Chronicling America is sponsored jointly by the
National Endowment for the Humanities and the Library of Congress. external link Learn more
Image provided by: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library, Urbana, IL
Newspaper Page Text
BOALT EXPLAINS THAT ENSIGN RICHARDSON
HIMSELF TOLD "LEY DE FUGA" STORY
BY FRED L. BOALT.
Vera Cruz, Mex., July 23. I heard
from that "ley de fuga" story, sure
enough, and in the way I had antici
pated. The first hint I had that I was "in
bad" with General Funston came last
Monday, when a note was delivered to
me from. Captain Burnside, formerly
military attache to the American em
bassy in Mexico City.
The note said that General Funston
wished to speak with me for a few
minutes at headquarters.
General Funston's first words were:
"Mr. Boalt, you seem to have been
dipping your pen in vermillion ink,"
and he flashed a clipping of the "ley
de fuga" story under my eyes.
"Did you write that?" he asked.
"Your name is over it."
"I wrote it," I said.
"I am instructed by the war de
partment," General Funston went on,
"to tell you that you must either
prove the allegations in this story or
be deported by the next transport."
"Less than 48 hours is not much
time," I objected.
"I am sorry," the general replied,
"but I am given no option in the mat
ter. The war department's instruc
tions are very explicit. You must
prove the story or go day after to
morrow." "General Funston," I said, "I got
that story from the officer- himself,
He cut me short "I do not wish to
know his name," he said quickly.
Later in the day I handed the gen
eral a statement in writing, in which
I set forth how I came to get the "ley
de fuga" story and my motive in writ
ing it. And in that letter I named En
sign Richardson. My purpose in doing
so was to remove from Funston's
mind any suspicion he might have
that I had invented the story about
an unnamed and imaginary naval officer.
A cable of mind to the states, ex
plaining my threatened deportation,
was held up over night, but finally got
through. On Tuesday I again saw
Funston, and he told me "to forget
about sailing on the next transport."
He said he had referred the matter
to Admiral Fletcher for investigation, t
Ensign Richardson being a naval t
I had a talk with the general, who r
said: "My personal impression is that l
the officer you talked with is a foolish J
young cub who, to use the vernacu- i
lar, 'talked through his hat' to get j
in the limelight." j
Shortly afterward Captain Burn- 3
side waylaid me in the corridor lead- I
ing to the general's office and led me 3
into a room for an "unofficial" talk.
He said: "Do you know what is 3
going to happen? Either you are go- 7
ing to be tried for lying or Ensign j
Richardson is going to be tried for j
I thought he was trying to frighten
me, so I laughed.
Then Burnside said, somewhat ir-
revelently: "Perhaps you didn't know
it, but Richardson had a sunstroke
the first day of the fighting.1
I did not ask Burnside why he told
me of this, but I inferred that he
meant to give me the impression that
Richardson may have been a trifle out 0
of his head, as a result of the sun
stroke, when he told me the "ley de
I quoted both Funston and Burn
side in my testimony before the naval
court of inquiry that followed.
Funston having "passed the buck"
to the navy, I received a polite note
from Colonel Alvord, Funston's chief
of staff, saying that Rear Admiral
Badger, commander-in-chief of the s
Atlantic fleet, had requested him to l
inform me that he (the admiral) de- U
sired my presence as a witness in
the case of Ensign Richardson, and a
adding, that a launch would be wait