OCR Interpretation


The Seattle Republican. [volume] (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, February 22, 1907, Image 7

Image and text provided by Washington State Library; Olympia, WA

Persistent link: https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn84025811/1907-02-22/ed-1/seq-7/

What is OCR?


Thumbnail for

THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN fILL SEND FOR YOUR LEGAL NOTICES
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for the County
of King. _
Alice Dobson, Plaintiff, vs. Elmer E.
Dobson, Defendant. —No Summons
by Publication.
The State of Washington to the said
Elmer E. Dobson, Defendant: You are
hereby summoned to appear within sixty
days after the date of the first publica
tion of this summons, to-wit, within six
ty days after the 22d day of February,
A. D. 1907, and defend the above entitled
action in the above entitled Court, and
answer the complaint of the plaintiff,
and serve a copy of your answer upon
the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at
his office below stated; and in case of
your failure so to do, judgment will be
rendered against you according to the
demand of the complaint, which has
been filed with the clerk of said Court.
The object of the said action is to dis
solve the bonds of matrimony existing
between the plaintiff and defendant here
in on the ground of the failure of the
defendant to make suitable provisions
for the plaintiff.
J. P. BALL,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
P. O. and Office Address: 9-10 Starr-
Boyd Bldg., Seattle, County of King,
Washington.
No. 54860.
SUMMONS BY PUBLICATION.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OP THE
State of Washington for the County
of King.
Helen M. Whorton, Plaintiff,
vs.
Edward A. Whorton, Defendant.
The State of Washington to the said
Edward A. Whorton, Defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication of this summons, to
wit, within sixty days after the 22d day
of February, A. D. 1907, and defend the
above entitled action in the above en
titled Court, and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your
answer upon the undersigned attorney
for plaintiff at his office below stated ;
and in case of your failure so to do,
judgment will be rendered against you
according to the demand of the com
plaint, which has been filed with the
Clerk of said Court. The object of the
said action is to dissolve the bonds of
matrimony existing between the plaintiff
and defendant herein on the ground of
the failure of the defendant to make
suitable provisions for the plaintiff and
also on the further ground of habitual
drunkenness.
J. P. BALL,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
Post Office Address: 9-10 Starr-Boyd
Bldg., Seattle, County of King, Wash
ington.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington in and for the
County of King.
In the matter of the Application of
Cocas Island Hydraulic & Treasure Com
pany to Dissolve. —No. 54442. Notice.
Notice is hereby given that the Cocas
Island Hydraulic & Treasure Company,
a corporation formed under the laws of
the State of Washington, has presented
to the Superior Court of the State of
Washington In and for the County of
King a petition praying to be allowed to
disincorporate and dissolve, and that
the 27th day of March, 1907, at the
hour of 9:30 o'clock A. M. of said day,
or as soon thereafter as counsel can be
heard, has been appointed as the time,
and the court room of Department Num
ber Four of .said Superior Court in and
for the County of King, at the court
house of said King County aforesaid, in
Seattle, Washington, before the Hon
orable R. B, Albertson, as the place
where said application is to be heard;
said petition prays that said corpora
tion be disincorporated and dissolved in
accordance with the law in such cases
made and provided.
In witness whereof I have hereunto
set my hand and affixed the seal of of
fice this 17th day of January, 1907.
(Seal.) OTTO A.' CASE,
County Clerk and Ex-Oflicio Clerk of the
Superior Court of the State of Wash
ington, for King County.
By C. F. GAGE, Deputy.
D. C. CONOVER.
Attorney for Petitioner.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT, COUNTY
of King, State of Washington.
Angus P. Richardson, Plaintiff, vs.
Harriett Richardson, Defendant.—No....
Summons.
The State of Washington to Harriet
Richardson, defendant:
You are hereby notified and sum
moned to be and appear in the above
entitled Court and defend the above en
titled action within sixty days after the
date of first publication of this sum
mons, exclusive of the date of the said
first publication, towit: within sixty
days after the 15th day of Feb., 1007,
and answer the complaint of the plain
tiff and serve a copy of your answer
upon the attorney for the plaintiff below
named at his office below stated, and In
case of your failure so to do judgment
will be rendered against you according
to the complaint of plaintiff, which
has been filed with the clerk of the
above entitled court.
The object of this action is to obtain
a decree of the above, entitled court sub
stituting the name of Angus F. Richard
THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN
son for the name of Harriet Richardson
as grantee in that certain deed of con
veyance dated April 28, 1896, wherein
Chas. A. Arend and Anna Arend, his
wife, conveyed to Harriett Richardson
the following described real property,
towit: Beginning at the North East
corner of the Southwest quarter of the
Southeast quarter of Section 27, Town
ship 25 North, Range 5 East, thence
westerly along the line of the said
Southwest quarter of said Southeast
quarter 72 rods, thence southernly paral
lel with the west line thereof 40 rods,
thence easterly parallel with the South
line thereof 72 rods, thence northernly
along the East line of said Southwest
quarter of said Southeast quarter 40
rods to the point of beginning, contain
ing 18 acres more or less, said deed be
ing recorded in Vol. 208 of Deeds at page
372, Auditor's Records of King Co.,
A. C. MacDONALD,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
525 Bailey Bldg., Seattle, Wash.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King County.
William L. Chellis, Plaintiff, vs. Laura
Chellis, Defendant. —No. 54154. Sum
mons by Publication.
The State of Washington to Laura
Chellis, defendant:
In the name of the State of Washing
ton: You are hereby summoned to ap
pear within sixty days from and after
the date of the first publication of this
summons, exclusive of said first date,
to-wit, within sixty days from and after
the 28th day of December, 1906, and
defend the above entitled action in the
above entitled Court, and answer the
complaint of the plaintiff and serve a
copy of your answer upon the under
signed attorney for the plaintiff, at his
offices below stated; and in case of your
failure so to do, judgment 'will be ren
dered against you according to the de
mand of the complaint which has been
filed with the Clerk of said Court. The
object of said • action set forth in the
complaint is as follows: to secure in
favor of plaintiff and from the defend
ant an absolute and unconditional di
vorce, forever dissolving the bonds of
matrimony existing between plaintiff
and defendant, upon the grounds of will
ful and unjustifiable desertion and
abandonment of plaintiff by defendant
continuously for more than one year's
time immediately preceding the com
mencement of this action, and the veri
fication of the complaint herein, as will
at large appear from the complaint, and
for other proper relief in the premises.
FRANK B. WIESTLING,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
Post-office address: 421-423 Boston
Block, Seattle, King County, Washing
ton.
Xo. 6699.
Order to Show Cause Wliy Distribtition
Should Ho- 1- Be Made and Final
Account Should Not Be
Approved.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OP THE
State of Washington for the County of
King.
IN PROBATE.
In the matter of the Estate of Hans
Oskar Hoglund, deceased.
Andrew Chilberg, administrator with
the will annexed of the estate of Hans
Oskar Hoglund, deceased, having filed in
this court his petition setting forth that
said estate is now in a condition to be
closed and is ready for distribution of
the residue thereof among the persons
entitled by ,law thereto, and it appear
ing to the court that said petition sets
forth facts sufficient to authorize a dis
tribution of the residue of said estate:
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by i
the court that all persons interested in •
the estate of the said Hans Oskar Hog
lund, deceased, be and appear before the
said Superior Court of King County,
State of Washington, at the court room
of the Probate department of said Court
in the City of Seattle, on the 7th day
Of March, 1907, at the hour of 9:30
o'clock A. M. of said day, then and
there to show cause, if any they have,
why said account should not be ap
proved and an order of distribution
should not be made of the residue of
said estate among the heirs and per
sons in said petition mentioned, accord
ing to law.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that a
copy of this order be published once a
week for four successive weeks before
the said 7th day of March, 1907, in The !
Seattle Republican, a newspaper print- |
ed and published in said King County i
and of general circulation therein.
Done in open court this 31st day of i
January, 1907.
R. B. ALBERTSON. Judge.
NOTICE OF STOCKHOLDERS' MEET
ING.
Seattle, Wash., Jan. 25th, 1907.
Notice is hereby given that the annual
meeting of the stockholders of the Alas
ka Central Railway Company will be
held in the office of the said company at
Room No. 305 of the Denny Building,
No. 1408 Second Avenue. Seattle, Wash
ington, on Tuesday, the sth day of
March, A. D. 1907, at two (2) o'clock in
; the afternoon.
JAMES A. HAIGHT,
Secretary, Alaska Central Railway Com-
pany.
Feb. I—Feb. 29.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King County.
John T. Waine, Plaintiff, vs. Lizzie
Jane Waine, Defendant. —No. Sum-
The State of Washington to the said
Lizzie Jane Waine, defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty (60) days after the dato
of the first publication of this summons,
towit: within sixty (60) days after the
11th day of January, 1907, and defend the
above entitled action in the above entitled
court, and answer the complaint or the
plaintiff, and serve a copy of your an
swer upon the undersigned attorneys lor
plaintiff at their office below stated; and
in case of your failure so to do, judgment
will be rendered against you according
to the demand of the complaint, which
has been filed with the clerk of said
C°This action is brought for the purpose
of securing a divorce from the defendant
upon the ground of abandonment.
GRAVES, PALMER & MURPHY,
Attorneys for Plaintiff.
P. O .Address: 911 Lowman Building,
Seattle, King County, Washington.
Date of first publication, January 11.
1907.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, in and for the
County of King.
Eva J. Davis, plaintiff, vs. George C.
Davis, Defendant. —No Summons.
The State of Washington to the said
George C. Davis, defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after date of the
first publication of this summons, towit,
within sixty days after the Ist day of
February, 1907, and defend the above
entitled action in the above entitled
court, and answer the complaint of the
plaintiff, and serve a copy of your an
swer upon the undersigned attorney for
the plaintiff, at his office below stated;
and in case of your failure so to do,
judgment will be rendered against you
according to the demand of the com
plaint, which has been filed with the
clerk of said Court.
The above entitled action is an action
for divorce dissolving the bonds of mat
rimony between the parties hereto on
the grounds of abandonment and des«r
tlOn' E. T. SCHOFF,
Postoffice address: 506 Pioneer Build
ing, Seattle, King County, Washington.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, in and for the
County of King.—ln Probate.
In the matter of the Estate of Charles
M Maltby.—No Order to Show
Cause on Sale of Real Estate.
Jennie D. Maltby, the duly appointed,
qualified and acting administratrix of
the estate of Charles M. Maltby, having
filed her petition in this court, duly veri
fied praying for an order of this court
for the sale of the real estate of Charles
M Maltby for the purposes therein set
forth, and it appearing to the court
from the said petition that there is not
sufficient personal estate of the said
Charles M. Maltby in the hands of the
said administratrix to pay the indebted
ness against the said estate, and that
it is necessary to sell the said real es
tate to pay the said indebtedness, as
aforesaid, and it appearing to the court
that said petition conforms to and is in
accordance with the requirements ot
law in such cases made and provided,
it is ordered by the court that all per
sons interested in the matter of the said
estate of said minor be and appear be
fore the said court on Thursday, the
28th day of February, 1907, at the hour
of 9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of said
day at the court room of department
number four (4) of said Superior Court,
In the City of Seattle, King County.
State of Washington, Bitting In probate,
then and there to sh..\v cause if any
they have, why an order ot this court
should noti be granted to the said ad
ministratrix authorizing and empower
ing her to sell the said real estate of
said Charles M. Maltby, deceased, to pay
the aforesaid indebtedness against the
said estate. It is further ordered that
a copy of this order to show cause be
published in the Seattle Republican for
four (4) successive weeks before the
28th day of February. 1907.
Done in open court this 31st day ot
January. 1907^ ALBERTS<^ Judge .
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING
County, State of Washington.
In the matter of the estate of Cath
erine Reilly, deceased. No. 7544. No
tice to creditors.
Notice is hereby given by the under
signed administrator of the estate of
Catherine Reilly, deceased, to the cred
itors of, and all persons having claims
against, the said deceased, to exhibit
them, with the necessary vouchers, with
in one year from the date of this notice,
to the said administrator at his place of
business, No. 418 T'.urke Building, in the
city of Seattle, King county, state of
Washington.
Dated Seattle, Washington, January
29th« I!)°7' PETER BOLLT, .
Administrator of the estate of Catherine
Beilly. deceased.
Feb. 8, 1907, Men. 1. 1907.
February 22, 1907
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King County.
Sadie Condit, Plaintiff, vs. Joel W. Con
dit, Defendant. No. 546G0. Summons
by publication.
The State of Washington 'to Joel W.
Condit, defendant:
In the name of the State of Washing
ton: You are hereby summoned to ap
pear within sixty days from and after
the date of the first publication of this
summons, exclusive of said rtrst date, to
wit, within sixty days from and after
the Bth day of February, 1907, and de
fend the above entitled action in the
above entitled Court and answer the
complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a
copy of your answer upon the under-
Blgned attorneys for the plaintiff at their
offices below stated; and in case of your
failure so to do, judgment will be ren
dered against you according to the de
many of the complaint which has been
filed with the Clerk of said Court. The
object of said action set forth in the
complaint is as follows: to secure a di
vorce from the defendant by the plain
tiff, upon the ground of neglect and re
fusal on the part of the defendant to
support the plaintiff, and for other prop
er relief in the premises.
J. M. WIESTLJNG and
FRANK B. WIESTLJNG,
Attorneys for Plaintiff.
Post-office address: 421-423 Boston
Block, Seattle, King Co., Washington.
Feb. 8, Mch. 29.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, in and for the
County of King.
Effle Welch, PJaintiff, vs. James E. .
Welch, Defendant. No. 54581. Sum
mons.
The State of Washington to the said
within sixty (60) days after the Bth
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty (60) days after the
day of February, 1907, and defend the
above entitled action in the above en
titled court, and answer the complaint
of plaintiff, and serve a copy of your
answer upon the undersigned attorney
for plaintiff at his office below stated;
and in case of your failure so to do,
judgment will be rendered against you
according to the demand of the com
plaint on file in the office of the Clerk
of said Court.
This action is brought by plaintiff to
secure a divorce from defendant upon
the ground of the failure and neglect of
defendant to make suitable provision for
his family.
J. A. WILLIAMS.
Attorney for Plaintiff.
P. O. Address: 217 and 21S Hinckley
Block, Seattle, King County, Washington.
February 8, M'ch. 29.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King County.
In the Matter of the disincorporation
of the Tailored Ready Company, a cor
poration organized and existing under
and by virtue of the laws of the State
of Washington. No. 54631. Notice of
application to disincorporate.
Notice is hereby given that the Tailor
ed Ready Company, a corporation organ
ized under the laws of the State of
Washington, having its principal place
of business in the City of Seattle, has
presented to the Superior Court of the
State of Washington for King County a
petition praying to be allowed to disin
corporate and dissolve, and that the 13th
day of April, 1907, at 9:30 o'clock in the
forenoon at the opening of court or as
soon thereafter as counsel can be heard
has been published as the time, and the
court room of the Superior Court, De
partmerft No. 4, of the State of Wash
ington for King County as the place at
which saiil application is to be heard.
Said petitioners recite that all Indebted
ness of said corporation has been fully
paid mikl that there are no unpaid claims
or demands against the same, and prays
that the assets of said corporation be
distributed among the stockholders en
titled thereto and tiiat the corporation
be disincorporated and dissolved in ac
cordance with the laws in such cases
made and provided.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto
set my hand and have affixed my official
seal this 4th day of February. I!" 1..
OTTO A. CASE.
County Clerk and ex-official clerk of the
Superior Court for King County.
i;.v c. B\ GAGE,
Deputy Clerk.
Feb. 8, April 12.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, in and for the
County of King.
Katherir.e Dilsaver, Plaintiff, vs. Ells
worth Dilsaver. Defendant. No. 53,908.
Summons and Service of Publication.
The State of Washington, to the said
Fllnworth Dilsaver, Defendant:
first publication of this summons, to
wit: Within sixty (GO) days after the
7th day of December, 1006, and defend
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty («0) days after date of the
the above entitled action in the above
entitled court, and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your
answer upon the undersigned attorney
for plaintiff, at his office below stated;
and in ease of your failure so to do,
.judgment will be rendered against you
according to the demand of the com
plaint which has been filed with the
Clerk of said Court; the object for which

xml | txt