Newspaper Page Text
FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Notice and Summons. K. Wlnslow, plaintiff, vs. Lascar P. Dv- Boise, and all persons unknown, If any, having or claiming an Interest In and to the hereinafter described real property, defendants. —No. 89050. State of Washington, to the above de fendants and each of them: You and each of you, as owners, claimants or holders of an interest or estate in and to the hereinafter de scribed real property, are hereby noti fied that the above named plaintiff Is the holder of eleven certain delinquent tax certificates issued by the treasurer of King County, State of Washington, dat ed the Bth day of April, 1912, and num bered as follows, for the delinquent taxes of the following year 1908, In the following amount, and upon the real property situated In said King County, described as follows, to-wit: Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, lot 3, block 38, certificate No. 876931, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, lot 4, block 38, certificate No. 876932, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, lot 5, block 38, certificate No. 876933, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, lot 6, block 38, certificate No. 876934, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, lot 7, block 38, certificate No. 876935, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, lot 8, block 38, certificate No. 876936, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, lot 9, block 38, certificate No. 876937, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, lot 10, block 38, certificate No. 876938, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, lot 11, block 38, certificate No. 876939, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, lot 12, block 38, certificate No. 876940, year 1908, amount $0.66. Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, lot 13, block 38, certificate No. 876941, year 1908, amount $0.66. That the taxes for the following prior and subsequent years have been paid by the plaintiff upon said above described real property, to-wit: Lot 3, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 31 cents,, for year 1909 Lot 3. block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. Lot. 3, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 Lot 4, block 38, Grove addition to Dcs Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909 Lot 4, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 28 cents, for year Lot 4, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 Lot 6, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 31 cents, for year Lot 5, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 28 cents, for year Lot 6, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 23 cents, for year Lot g. block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909 Lot 6, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 28 centß, for year Lot 6, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 Lot 7, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909 Lot 7, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 28 cents, for year Lot 7 block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 Lot 8, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909 Lot 8, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 19 Lot 8, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 Lot 9, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909 Lot 9, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 19Lot 9, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911 Lot 10, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1909 Lot 10, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines. amount 28 cents, for year 19Lot 10. block 38. Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 23 cents, for year Lot 11, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 31 cents, for year 1 909 Lot 11 block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 19Lot 11, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1 Qll Lot 12, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 31 cents, for year Lot 12, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 19Lot 12, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moineu, amount 23 cents, for year 1 911 Lot 13, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 31 cents, fpr year 1909. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Lot 13, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 28 cents, for year 1910. Lot 13, block 38, Grove Addition to Dcs Moines, amount 23 cents, for year 1911. Which several sums bear interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from date of payment, and are all the un paid and unredeemed taxes upon and against said real property. You and each of you (including said persons unknown, if any), are hereby further notified and summoned to be and appear within sixty days after the date of first publication of this notice, exclusive of the day of said first pub lication, to-wit, within sixty days after the 2nd day of August, 1911, In the above entitled court and action; and defend this action and answer the com plaint of said plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer on the undersigned at torneys for plaintiff at this office be low stated, or pay the amount due, to gether with interest and costs. In case you fail so to do, judgment will be ren dered herein, foreclosing the lien of said taxes and costs against each par cel of said real property for the sums and amounts due upon and charged against each, for said taxes, interest and costs, ordering a sale of each par cel of said property for the satisfaction of the sums charged and found against it respectively as provided by law, and as prayed in plaintiff's complaint, now on file in this cause and court. K. WINSLOW, Plaintiff. McLEAN & BALLIET, Empire Bldg., Seattle. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Office address 663-4-5 Empire Build ing, Seattle, Washington. August 2 —September 13, 1912. IN THK SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Etta C. Chapman, Deceased. No. . Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. D. H. Chapman, administrator of the estate of Etta C. Chapman, deceased, having filed in this court his final ac count and petition setting forth that said estate is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons en titled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition .sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribu tion of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested In the estate of the said estate of Etta C. Chapman, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, State of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said court In Seattle, King County, State of Washing ton, on the 12th day of October, 1912. at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, why Mtid final ac count should not. be allowed and an or der of distribution be made of the resi due of said estate among the heir.s and persons in said netition mentioned, ac cording to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to Bftld hear ing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 12th day of Ootooflr, 1912, in "Seattle Jin publican," a newspaper printed and pub lished in said King County anu of gen eral circulation therein. Done in open court this 10th day of September, 1912. A. \V. FRATER, Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OP THE State of Washington, for King County. Hose Hesaw. Palintiff, vs. Charles fie saw, Defendant. No. . Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Charles Besaw. Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 20th day of September, 1912, and defend the. above entitled action in the above entitled court/, and answer the complaint ofu^e plain tiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plain tiff at his office below stated: and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered asainst you according to tlio demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce on the grounds of non-support and deser tion HOMER E. TTTRNBR. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. (). Address 508-10 Lyon Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 20—Nov. 1, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington in and for the County of King. Summons by Pub lication. Maud M. Peugh, plaintiff, vs. Frank J. Peugh, defendant. —No. ——-. The State of Washington to the said Frank J. Peugh, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 2nd of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered aiainst you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant for the following reasons: First. —Because, without plaintiff's fault, the defendant abandoned the plaintiff at Bakersfield, California, in April, 1909, said abandonment being con tinuous for one year and more. Secon.—Because, without the plain tiff's fault the defendant since April, 1909, has neglected and refused to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family and still neglects and re fuses to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family. Plaintiff also seeks the restoration of her maiden name, Maud M. Burgua. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address, Steven's Dancing Academy, Second Floor, Fourth Avenue between Pike and Pine Streets, Seattle, Washington. August 2—September 13, 1912. IX THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun- ty. Nellie Schork, Plaintiff, vs. Clarence J. Schork, Defendant. No. . Summons for Publication. The State of Washington, to the above defendant, Clarence .1. Schork: You are hereby .summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 20th day of September, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above en titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, ludgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a judgment of divorce from the defendant, upon the grounds of in compatability of temperament, and upon the further ground* of defendant's fail ure to support and provide for the plain- E. F. KIENSTRA, Attorney tor Plaintiff. I', o. Address, 2n<> Qpler Block, Seattle, IN TH B SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King Coun ty. Summons by Publication. German Savings, Building & Loan As sociation, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. F F. Travis, Maud E. Travis, his wife; William Jensen, Hulda Jensen, his wife; P. H. Ammidown and Jane Doe Ammidown, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Margaret K. Dy er; the General Hauling Company, a corporation, defendants. —No. 87754. The State of Washington to P. H. Am midown, Jane Doe Ammidon, his wife; Margaret K. Ammidown, now Mar garet K. Dyer: You and each of you are hereby sum moned and required to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 19th day of July, 1912, and defend the above en titled action in the above entitled court and answer the complaint of the plain tiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plain tiff, at the address below stated and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judgment from said court in favor of the plaintiff, against the said defendants, F. F. Travis, and Maud E Travis, his wife, for the sum of Ten Hundred Sixty-one Dollars and twelve cents ($1,061.12), together with interest thereon at the rate of 12 per cent per annum, and interest, attorney s fees, costs and disbursements, and to foreclose that certain mortgage made by the said defendants on the 28th day of February, 1906, for the sum of $ 1, --650.00 (Sixteen Hundred and Fifty Dol lars) upon Lot 5, Block 5, Wostlake Boulevard Addition to the City of Seat tle, King County, Washington, which mortgage is of record in Vol. 285 of Mortgages, page 360, record of mort gages in the office of the auditor of King County, Washington, and for the sale of said lands to satisfy the amount that may be adjudged by the court to the plaintiff and to bar and foreclose all right, title and interest of each and all of said defendants in and to said lands and premises and every part thereof and^^neral^liet Attorney for Plaintiff. Office and Postoffice address, 604-5 Mutual Life Bldg., Seattle, King Coun ty, Wash. IX THE SUPERIOR COURT OF 'Nils State of Washington, for Kins County. .Max L. Kendall, Plaintiff, vs. Louise Kendall. Defendant. No. 89686. Sum- mons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Louis* Kendall, Defendant: You arc hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty .lays atter the 13th day of September, 1912. and defend the above entitled action in the above en titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at bis office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled ac tion is an absolute divorce on the grounds of cruelty and abandonment. JOHN R. WILSON, Plaintiff's Attorney. P O Address 589 New Yonk Jt>lock, Se attle Kintr County, Washington. September 13 —November 1, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. Axel Nelson and Emma Nelson, his wife, palintiffs, vs. G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant. —No. . The State of Washington to the said G J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 23rd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above en titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain Judg ment against this defendant on one certain promissory note for one thou sand dollars ($1,000), and interest there on at 6 per cent from April 25th, 1910, and to foreclose one certain mortgage, of date April 28th, 1910, on the follow ing real estate, to-wit, lots five (5), six (6), seventeen (17), and eighteen (18), Steel Works Addition to West Seattle, King County, Washington, which said mortgage was given to secure said note. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P O Address, 405-406 Eiler Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. TN THE SUPERIOR COURT OP THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Axel Nelson and Emma Nelson, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant. —No. . The State of Washington to the said G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first, publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 23rd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above en titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain judg ment against this defendant on one cer tain promissory note dated January 18, 1910, for the sum of seven hundred dol lars ($700), with interest at 6 per cent, and to foreclose mortgage, given to se cure said note, on lot twelve (12), block two (2), of Star Addition to West Seat tle, King County, Washington, which said mortgage was given to secure said A. J. AL.L.BN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 405-406 Eiler Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. TN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Schwabacher Hardware Company, a Cor poration, plaintiff, vs. B. F. Zimmer man, and Carroll Hayward Zimmer man, his wife, and R. L. Hankinson, and Jane Doe Hankinson, his wife, defendants—No. 89294. The State of Washington to the said B. F. Zimmerman, and Carroll Hay ward Zimmerman, his wife, and R. L. Hankinson and Jane Doe Hankinson, his wife, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit- Within sixty days after the 23rd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above en titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at torneys for plaintiff at their office be low stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The ob ject of the above entitled action Is to foreclose that certain mortgage given by the defendants, B. F. Zimmerman and Carroll Hayward Zimmerman, his wife, to SchM'abacher Hardware Com pany, a corporation, dated August 10. 1911 to secure the payment of the sum of $2,500.00 one year after said date, with interest at 8 per cent, and an at torney's fee of $250.00, and for a de ficiency judgment. LEOPOLD M. STERN & J. W. RUSSELL, Plaintiff's Attorney. p O Address, 714 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 23—October 4, 1912. IX THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for the County of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Edward C. Heuss, Deceased, No. 14080. No tice of Change of Administrator. Notice is hereby given that Fritz H. Huess, the Administrator of the above entitled estate, has been removed, and that Tillie Huess has been appointed Administratrix of said estate in his steart. Creditors are hereby notified to pre sent their claims against said estate to ■aid Administratrix at her place for the transaction of business, to-wit: 1307 Hoge Building Seattle, Washington, within one year from the date of the notice to creditors previously published TILLIE HUESS, Administratrix De bonis non of the Es tate of Edward C. Huess, Deceased. Sept. 20 Oct. 5, 1912, 7