Newspaper Page Text
FRIDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King Coun ty Carl' H. Eggert. Plaintiff, vs. Madison Connor and Harriet E. Connor, his wife, and Henry Markam, Defend ants. No. . Summons by Pub lication. The State of "Washington to the said Madison Connor and Harriet E. Con nor, his wife, and Henry Markam, Defendants. You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit: Within sixty days after the 4th day of October, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the com plaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff at their office below stated; and in case of your fail ure so to do, judgment will be ren dered against you according to the de mand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to recover judgment upon a promissory note for $525.00 dated Octo ber 14, 1908, due October 14, 1911, with interest at 9 per cent per annum from April 17, 1911, and for interest after delinquency at the rate of 12 per cent per annum; for $100.00 attorneys fee and for costs; and to foreclose a mort gage given to secure said note, record ed in volume 415 of Mortgages, page 473, in the records of King County, Washington, upon lot 20, biock 4, of Adams' Home Tracts, situated in said King County, Washington, which mort gage is a first lien upon said property, and to foreclose all right, title and in terest of said defendants and each or them in and to said lots; and for a deficiency judgment against said Madi son Connor and Harriet E. Connor, his wife, and for general relief. A. H. FOOTE, PETERSON & MACBRIDE, Plaintiff's Attorneys. p O Address: 602 Hoge Building, Se attle, King County, Washington October 4—November 15, 19iJ. CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PART nership of The Cain & Cain Company. We, the undersigned, A. L. Cain, Cora B. Cain, as general partners, and A W. Bricker and John N. Mclntyre, as special partners, all citizens of the United States, and residents of the County of King, State of Washington being desirous of forming a limited partnership pursuant to and in con formity with the laws of the State of Washington, do hereby make, subscribe and acknawledge, in duplicate, the fol lowing certificate of limited partner- The "name assumed by said limited partnership and under which the busi ness of said limited partnership shall be conducted shall be "The Cain & Cain Grocery." The names and places of residence of the general partners are as follows, io~A [tij Cain, residence, Seattle King County, Washington; Cora B. Cain, res idence, Seattle, King County, Washing- The names and places of residence of the special partners are as follows, to wit' W A. Bricker, residence, Seattle, King County, Washington; John N. Mc lntyre, residence, Seattle, King County, Washington. , . . The principal place of business of said limited partnership shall be locat ed in the city of Seattle, King County, The "amount of capital which each special partner has contributed to the common stock is as follows to-wit. W A Bricker, special partner, has con tributed $640.00; John N Mclntyre, spe cial partner, has contributed $10.00. The general nature of the business to be transacted by said special part nership shall be the buying, handling and selling of a general line of gro ceries, fresh and salt meats, flour, feed notions, and in general the doing of all things necessary to be done in the proper conduct of a general retail gro cery, feed and notion store and meat in i\ rlcpt The time when said special partner ship shall commence shall be October Ist 1912, and the time when said spe cial partnership shall terminate shall 6ln witness whereof, the above named general and special partners have re spectively subscribed these^ certificates of special partnership, in duplicate at \zs v ™* ■bswb ttß&srt &"" A. 1, CATN. CORA B. CAIN, W. A. BRICKER, JOHN N. McINTYRE, State of Washington, County of King, A 3' L. Cain, Cora B. Cain, W. A. Bricker, and John N. Mclntyre, being severally first duly sworn, each for hhnself and not one for the other, says, that he is one of the persons named in the foregoing Certificate of Special Part nership; that they have read the same and know the contents thereof and that all matters therein contained are true, that they have signed the same as their free and voluntary acts and deeds for the uses and purposes therein men tlOned- A. L. CAIN, CORA B. CAIN, W. A. BRICKER, JOHN N. McINTYRE, Subscribed and sworn to before me. this 27th day of September, A. D. 1 m i (Seal) GEO. H. BAILEY, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Seattle. October 4—October 25. 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington In and for the County of King. Summons by Pub lication. THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN Maud M. Peugh, plaintiff, vs. Frank J. Peugh, defendant.—No. . The State of Washington to the said Frank J. Peugh, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to-wit, within sixty days after the 2nd of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above court and answer the complaint of the plaintiff and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff, at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do judgment will be rendered aiainst you according to the demand of the complaint which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of this action is to obtain a decree of divorce from the defendant for the following reasons: First.—Because, without plaintiff's fault, the defendant abandoned the plaintiff at Bakersfield, California, in April, 1909, said abandonment being con tinuous for one year and more. Secon.—Because, without the plain tiff's fault the defendant since April, 1909, has neglected and refused to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family and still neglects and re fuses to make suitable provisions for the plaintiff and his family. Plaintiff also seeks the restoration of her maiden name, Maud M. Burgua. A. J. SPECKERT, Attorney for Plaintiff. Postoffice Address, Steven's Dancing Academy, Second Floor, Fourth Avenue between Pike and Pine Streets, Seattle, Washington. August 2—September 13, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OP THE State of Washington, in and for King County. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Rich ard J. Thompson, Deceased, No. 6998. Notice of Sale of Real Es tate. Notice is hereby given that the un dersigned will sell to the highest and best bidder for cash the following de scribed real estate situated in King County, State of Washington, to-wit: Lot 13, Block 13, Madison Park Addi tion to the City of Seattle. All bids must be in writing accom panied by a certified check or cash for at least 10 per cent of the amount bid, and addressed to Minnie Thomp son McCarty, administratrix, Room 10 Haller Building, said administratrix reserving the right to reject any and all bids, said sale to be made on or after Monday, October 21st, 1912. MINNIE THOMPSON McCARTY, Administratrix of the Estate of Rich ard J. Thompson, Deceased. October 4—October 18, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in the County of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Etta C. Chapman, Deceased. No. . Order Fixing Time to Hear Final Account and to Show Cause Why Distribution Should Not Be Made. D. H. Chiipman, administrator of the estate of Etta C. Chapman, deceased, having filed in this court his final ac count and petition setting forth that said «state is now in a condition to be closed and is ready for distribution of the residue thereof among the persons en titled by law thereto, and it appearing to the court that said petition sets forth facts sufficient to authorize a distribu tion of the residue of said estate: It is therefore ordered by the court that all persons interested in the estate of the said estate of Etta C. Chapman, deceased, be and appear before the said Superior Court of King County, Stato of Washington, at the court room of the Probate Department of said court in Seattle, King County, State of Washing ton, on the 12th day of October, 1912. at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of said day, then and there to show cause, if any they have, ' why said final ac count should not be allowed and an or der of distribution be made of the resi due of said estate among the heirs and persons in said petition mentioned, ac cording to law. It is further ordered, that a copy of this order be posted in three of the most public places in King County, for a period of four weeks prior to said hear ing and published once a week for four consecutive weeks before the said 12th day of Oetouer. 1912, in "Seattle Re publican," a newspaper printed and pub lished in said King County anu of gen eral circulation therein. Done in open court this 10th day of September, 1912. A. W. FRATER, Judge. State of Washington, County of King, ss. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OP THE State of Washington, for King County. Rose Besaw. Palintiff, vs. Charles Be saw, Defendant. No. . Summons for Publication. The State of Washington to the said Charles Besaw, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the lirst publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 20th day of September, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above entitled court* and answer the complaint oftue plain tiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plain tiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a decree of divorce on the ffrounda of non-support and deser tion HOMER E. TURNER. Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address 508-10 Lyon Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. Sept. 20—Nov. 1, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OP THE State of Washington, for King Coun ty. Nellie Schork, Plaintiff, vs. Clarence J. Schork, Defendant. No. . Summons for Publication. The State of Washington, to the above defendant, Clarence J. Schork: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 20th day of September, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above en titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action is to obtain a judgment of divorce from the defendant, upon the grounds of in compatability of temperament, and upon the further grounds of defendant's fail ure to support and provide for the plain tiff. E. F. KIENSTRA, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 200 Epler Block, Seattle, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington for the County of King. Summons by Publication. Dora Hannah Wright, plaintiff, vs. Row land Raymond Wright, defendant. — No. 88142. The State of Washington to the said Rowland Raymond Wright, defend ant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after 27th day of September, A. D. 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above en titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated. And in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To secure an absolute decree of divorce on the grounds of abandonment, non-support and cruelty. WM. R. BELL, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address 304 Lyon Building, Seat tle, County of King, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE of King. Summons by Publication. State of Washington for the County Katherine Bowman, plaintiff, vs. H. Bow man, defendant.—No. 90062. The State of Washington, to the said H. Bowman, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit, within sixty days after the 27th day of September, A. D. 1912, and de fend the above entitled action in the above entitled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the under signed attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated. And in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court The object of the said action, set forth in the complaint, is as follows: To secure an absolute decree of divorce on the grounds of non support and cruelty. WM. R. BELL, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 304 Lyon Building, Se attle, County of King, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Max L. Kendall, Plaintiff, vs. Louise Kendall. Defendant. No. 89685. Sum mons by Publication. The State of Washington to the said Louise Kendall, Defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wlt: within sixty days after the 13th day of September, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above en titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled ac tion is an absolute divorce on the grounds of cruelty and abandonment. JOHN R. WILSON, Plaintiff's Attorney. P O. Address 539 New Yor.k Jalock, Se attle, King County, Washington. September 13 —November 1, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, for King County. Summons for Publication. Axel Nelson and Emma Nelson, his wife, palintiffs, vs. G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant. —No. . The State of Washington to the said G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 23rd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action In the above en titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and in case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of the above entitled action Is to obtain judg- ment against this defendant on one certain promissory note for one thou sand dollars ($1,000), and interest there on at 6 per cent from April 25th, 1910, and to foreclose one certain mortgage, of date April 28th, 1910, on the follow ing real estate, to-wit, lots five (6), six (6), seventeen (17), and »ighteen (18), Steel Works Addition to West Seattle, King County, Washington, which said mortgage was given to secure said note. A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P O. Address, 405-406 Eiler Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OP THE State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Axel Nelson and Emma Nelson, his wife, plaintiffs, vs. G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant. —No. . The State of Washington to the said G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J. Dahl, defendant: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: within sixty days after the 23rd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above en titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned attorney for plaintiff at his office below stated; and In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the com plaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The object of th« above entitled action is to obtain Judg ment against this defendant on one cer tain promissory note dated January 18, 1910, for the sum of seven hundred dol lars ($700), with interest at 6 per cent, and to foreclose mortgage, given to se cure said note, on lot twelve (12), block two (2), of Star Addition to West Seat tle, King County, Washington, which said mortgage was given to secure said A. J. ALLEN, Attorney for Plaintiff. P. O. Address, 405-406 Eiler Bldg., Seattle, King County, Washington. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THI State of Washington for King County. Summons for Publication. Schwabacher Hardware Company, a Cor poration, plaintiff, vs. B. F. Zimmer man, and Carroll Hayward Zimmer man, his wife, and R. L. Hankinson, and Jane Doe Hankinson, his wife, defendants —No. 89294. The State of Washington to the Bald B. F. Zimmerman, and Carroll Hay ward Zimmerman, his wife, and R. L. Hankinson and Jane Doe Hankinson, his wife, defendants: You are hereby summoned to appear within sixty days after the date of the first publication of this summons, to wit: Within sixty days after the 23rd day of August, 1912, and defend the above entitled action in the above en titled court, and answer the complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your answer upon the undersigned at torneys for plaintiff at their office be low stated; and In case of your failure so to do, judgment will be rendered against you according to the demand of the complaint, which has been filed with the clerk of said court. The ob ject of the above entitled action Is to foreclose that certain mortgage given by the defendants, B. F. Zimmerman and Carroll Hayward Zimmerman, hla wife, to Schwabacher Hardware Com pany, a corporation, dated August 10, 1911. to secure the payment of the sum of $2,500.00 one year after said date, with interest at 8 per cent, and an at torney's fee of $250.00, and for a de ficiency judgment. y LEOPOLD M. STERN & J. W. RUSSELL, Plaintiffs Attorney, p O Address, 714 Lowman Building, Seattle, King County, Washington. August 23—October 4, 1912. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE State of Washington, in and for th« County of King. In Probate. In the Matter of the Estate of Edward C. Heuss, Deceased. No. 14080. No tice of Change of Administrator. Notice is hereby given that Fritz H. Huess, the Administrator of the above entitled estate, has been removed, and that Tillie Huess has been appointed Administratrix of said estate in his stead. Creditors are hereby notified to pre sent their claims against said estate to said Administratrix at her place for the transaction of business, to-wit: 1307 Hoge Building Seattle, Washington, within one year from the date of the notice to creditors previously published to-wit* TILLIE HUESS. Administratrix De bonis non of the Es tate of Edward C. Huess, Deceased. Sept. 20 Oct. 5, 1912. "On what grounds does your father object to me?" he asked. "On any grounds within a mile of our house," she answered. Byker—l attended a successful sleight-of-hand performance last night. Pyker—ls that sot Byker—Yes. I lent the conjur or a counterfeit dollar-bill and he gave me back a good one. f