OCR Interpretation


The Seattle Republican. (Seattle, Wash.) 1???-1915, October 11, 1912, Image 7

Image and text provided by Washington State Library; Olympia, WA

Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn84025811/1912-10-11/ed-1/seq-7/

What is OCR?


Thumbnail for 7

FRIDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1912.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King Coun
ty
Carl' H. Eggert. Plaintiff, vs. Madison
Connor and Harriet E. Connor, his
wife, and Henry Markam, Defend
ants. No. . Summons by Pub
lication.
The State of "Washington to the said
Madison Connor and Harriet E. Con
nor, his wife, and Henry Markam,
Defendants.
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of
the first publication of this summons,
to-wit: Within sixty days after the
4th day of October, 1912, and defend
the above entitled action in the above
entitled court, and answer the com
plaint of the plaintiff, and serve a copy
of your answer upon the undersigned
attorneys for plaintiff at their office
below stated; and in case of your fail
ure so to do, judgment will be ren
dered against you according to the de
mand of the complaint, which has been
filed with the clerk of said court.
The object of the above entitled
action is to recover judgment upon a
promissory note for $525.00 dated Octo
ber 14, 1908, due October 14, 1911, with
interest at 9 per cent per annum from
April 17, 1911, and for interest after
delinquency at the rate of 12 per cent
per annum; for $100.00 attorneys fee
and for costs; and to foreclose a mort
gage given to secure said note, record
ed in volume 415 of Mortgages, page
473, in the records of King County,
Washington, upon lot 20, biock 4, of
Adams' Home Tracts, situated in said
King County, Washington, which mort
gage is a first lien upon said property,
and to foreclose all right, title and in
terest of said defendants and each or
them in and to said lots; and for a
deficiency judgment against said Madi
son Connor and Harriet E. Connor, his
wife, and for general relief.
A. H. FOOTE,
PETERSON & MACBRIDE,
Plaintiff's Attorneys.
p O Address: 602 Hoge Building, Se
attle, King County, Washington
October 4—November 15, 19iJ.
CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PART
nership of The Cain & Cain Company.
We, the undersigned, A. L. Cain,
Cora B. Cain, as general partners, and
A W. Bricker and John N. Mclntyre,
as special partners, all citizens of the
United States, and residents of the
County of King, State of Washington
being desirous of forming a limited
partnership pursuant to and in con
formity with the laws of the State of
Washington, do hereby make, subscribe
and acknawledge, in duplicate, the fol
lowing certificate of limited partner-
The "name assumed by said limited
partnership and under which the busi
ness of said limited partnership shall
be conducted shall be "The Cain &
Cain Grocery."
The names and places of residence
of the general partners are as follows,
io~A [tij Cain, residence, Seattle King
County, Washington; Cora B. Cain, res
idence, Seattle, King County, Washing-
The names and places of residence of
the special partners are as follows, to
wit'
W A. Bricker, residence, Seattle,
King County, Washington; John N. Mc
lntyre, residence, Seattle, King County,
Washington. , . .
The principal place of business of
said limited partnership shall be locat
ed in the city of Seattle, King County,
The "amount of capital which each
special partner has contributed to the
common stock is as follows to-wit.
W A Bricker, special partner, has con
tributed $640.00; John N Mclntyre, spe
cial partner, has contributed $10.00.
The general nature of the business
to be transacted by said special part
nership shall be the buying, handling
and selling of a general line of gro
ceries, fresh and salt meats, flour, feed
notions, and in general the doing of
all things necessary to be done in the
proper conduct of a general retail gro
cery, feed and notion store and meat
in i\ rlcpt
The time when said special partner
ship shall commence shall be October
Ist 1912, and the time when said spe
cial partnership shall terminate shall
6ln witness whereof, the above named
general and special partners have re
spectively subscribed these^ certificates
of special partnership, in duplicate at
\zs v ™* ■bswb ttß&srt
&"" A. 1, CATN.
CORA B. CAIN,
W. A. BRICKER,
JOHN N. McINTYRE,
State of Washington, County of King,
A 3' L. Cain, Cora B. Cain, W. A.
Bricker, and John N. Mclntyre, being
severally first duly sworn, each for
hhnself and not one for the other, says,
that he is one of the persons named in
the foregoing Certificate of Special Part
nership; that they have read the same
and know the contents thereof and that
all matters therein contained are true,
that they have signed the same as their
free and voluntary acts and deeds for
the uses and purposes therein men
tlOned- A. L. CAIN,
CORA B. CAIN,
W. A. BRICKER,
JOHN N. McINTYRE,
Subscribed and sworn to before me.
this 27th day of September, A. D.
1 m i
(Seal) GEO. H. BAILEY,
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at Seattle.
October 4—October 25. 1912.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington In and for the
County of King. Summons by Pub
lication.
THE SEATTLE REPUBLICAN
Maud M. Peugh, plaintiff, vs. Frank J.
Peugh, defendant.—No. .
The State of Washington to the said
Frank J. Peugh, defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty (60) days after the date of
the first publication of this summons,
to-wit, within sixty days after the 2nd
of August, 1912, and defend the above
entitled action in the above court and
answer the complaint of the plaintiff
and serve a copy of your answer upon
the undersigned attorney for plaintiff,
at his office below stated; and in case
of your failure so to do judgment will
be rendered aiainst you according to the
demand of the complaint which has been
filed with the clerk of said court.
The object of this action is to obtain
a decree of divorce from the defendant
for the following reasons:
First.—Because, without plaintiff's
fault, the defendant abandoned the
plaintiff at Bakersfield, California, in
April, 1909, said abandonment being con
tinuous for one year and more.
Secon.—Because, without the plain
tiff's fault the defendant since April,
1909, has neglected and refused to make
suitable provisions for the plaintiff and
his family and still neglects and re
fuses to make suitable provisions for
the plaintiff and his family.
Plaintiff also seeks the restoration of
her maiden name, Maud M. Burgua.
A. J. SPECKERT,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
Postoffice Address, Steven's Dancing
Academy, Second Floor, Fourth Avenue
between Pike and Pine Streets, Seattle,
Washington.
August 2—September 13, 1912.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OP THE
State of Washington, in and for
King County. In Probate.
In the Matter of the Estate of Rich
ard J. Thompson, Deceased, No.
6998. Notice of Sale of Real Es
tate.
Notice is hereby given that the un
dersigned will sell to the highest and
best bidder for cash the following de
scribed real estate situated in King
County, State of Washington, to-wit:
Lot 13, Block 13, Madison Park Addi
tion to the City of Seattle.
All bids must be in writing accom
panied by a certified check or cash
for at least 10 per cent of the amount
bid, and addressed to Minnie Thomp
son McCarty, administratrix, Room 10
Haller Building, said administratrix
reserving the right to reject any and
all bids, said sale to be made on or
after Monday, October 21st, 1912.
MINNIE THOMPSON McCARTY,
Administratrix of the Estate of Rich
ard J. Thompson, Deceased.
October 4—October 18, 1912.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, in the County of
King. In Probate.
In the Matter of the Estate of Etta C.
Chapman, Deceased. No. . Order
Fixing Time to Hear Final Account
and to Show Cause Why Distribution
Should Not Be Made.
D. H. Chiipman, administrator of the
estate of Etta C. Chapman, deceased,
having filed in this court his final ac
count and petition setting forth that said
«state is now in a condition to be closed
and is ready for distribution of the
residue thereof among the persons en
titled by law thereto, and it appearing
to the court that said petition sets forth
facts sufficient to authorize a distribu
tion of the residue of said estate:
It is therefore ordered by the court
that all persons interested in the estate
of the said estate of Etta C. Chapman,
deceased, be and appear before the said
Superior Court of King County, Stato
of Washington, at the court room of the
Probate Department of said court in
Seattle, King County, State of Washing
ton, on the 12th day of October, 1912.
at the hour of 9:30 o'clock a. m. of
said day, then and there to show cause,
if any they have, ' why said final ac
count should not be allowed and an or
der of distribution be made of the resi
due of said estate among the heirs and
persons in said petition mentioned, ac
cording to law.
It is further ordered, that a copy of
this order be posted in three of the most
public places in King County, for a
period of four weeks prior to said hear
ing and published once a week for four
consecutive weeks before the said 12th
day of Oetouer. 1912, in "Seattle Re
publican," a newspaper printed and pub
lished in said King County anu of gen
eral circulation therein.
Done in open court this 10th day of
September, 1912.
A. W. FRATER, Judge.
State of Washington, County of King, ss.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OP THE
State of Washington, for King County.
Rose Besaw. Palintiff, vs. Charles Be
saw, Defendant. No. . Summons
for Publication.
The State of Washington to the said
Charles Besaw, Defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
lirst publication of this summons, to
wit: within sixty days after the 20th day
of September, 1912, and defend the above
entitled action in the above entitled court*
and answer the complaint oftue plain
tiff, and serve a copy of your answer
upon the undersigned attorney for plain
tiff at his office below stated; and in
case of your failure so to do, judgment
will be rendered against you according
to the demand of the complaint, which
has been filed with the clerk of said
court. The object of the above entitled
action is to obtain a decree of divorce on
the ffrounda of non-support and deser
tion
HOMER E. TURNER.
Attorney for Plaintiff.
P. O. Address 508-10 Lyon Bldg., Seattle,
King County, Washington.
Sept. 20—Nov. 1, 1912.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OP THE
State of Washington, for King Coun
ty.
Nellie Schork, Plaintiff, vs. Clarence J.
Schork, Defendant. No. . Summons
for Publication.
The State of Washington, to the above
defendant, Clarence J. Schork:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication of this summons, to
wit: Within sixty days after the 20th
day of September, 1912, and defend the
above entitled action in the above en
titled court, and answer the complaint of
the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your
answer upon the undersigned attorney
for plaintiff at his office below stated;
and in case of your failure so to do,
judgment will be rendered against you
according to the demand of the com
plaint, which has been filed with the
clerk of said court.
The object of the above entitled action
is to obtain a judgment of divorce from
the defendant, upon the grounds of in
compatability of temperament, and upon
the further grounds of defendant's fail
ure to support and provide for the plain
tiff.
E. F. KIENSTRA,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
P. O. Address, 200 Epler Block, Seattle,
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington for the County
of King. Summons by Publication.
Dora Hannah Wright, plaintiff, vs. Row
land Raymond Wright, defendant. —
No. 88142.
The State of Washington to the said
Rowland Raymond Wright, defend
ant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication of this summons, to
wit, within sixty days after 27th day of
September, A. D. 1912, and defend the
above entitled action in the above en
titled court, and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your
answer upon the undersigned attorney
for plaintiff at his office below stated.
And in case of your failure so to do,
judgment will be rendered against you
according to the demand of the com
plaint, which has been filed with the
clerk of said court. The object of the
said action, set forth in the complaint,
is as follows: To secure an absolute
decree of divorce on the grounds of
abandonment, non-support and cruelty.
WM. R. BELL,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
P. O. Address 304 Lyon Building, Seat
tle, County of King, Washington.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
of King. Summons by Publication.
State of Washington for the County
Katherine Bowman, plaintiff, vs. H. Bow
man, defendant.—No. 90062.
The State of Washington, to the said
H. Bowman, defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication of this summons, to
wit, within sixty days after the 27th
day of September, A. D. 1912, and de
fend the above entitled action in the
above entitled court, and answer the
complaint of the plaintiff, and serve a
copy of your answer upon the under
signed attorney for plaintiff at his office
below stated.
And in case of your failure so to do,
judgment will be rendered against you
according to the demand of the com
plaint, which has been filed with the
clerk of said court The object of the
said action, set forth in the complaint,
is as follows: To secure an absolute
decree of divorce on the grounds of non
support and cruelty.
WM. R. BELL,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
P. O. Address, 304 Lyon Building, Se
attle, County of King, Washington.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King County.
Max L. Kendall, Plaintiff, vs. Louise
Kendall. Defendant. No. 89685. Sum
mons by Publication.
The State of Washington to the said
Louise Kendall, Defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication of this summons, to
wlt: within sixty days after the 13th
day of September, 1912, and defend the
above entitled action in the above en
titled court, and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your
answer upon the undersigned attorney
for plaintiff at his office below stated;
and In case of your failure so to do,
judgment will be rendered against you
according to the demand of the com
plaint, which has been filed with the
clerk of said court.
The object of the above entitled ac
tion is an absolute divorce on the
grounds of cruelty and abandonment.
JOHN R. WILSON,
Plaintiff's Attorney.
P O. Address 539 New Yor.k Jalock, Se
attle, King County, Washington.
September 13 —November 1, 1912.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, for King County.
Summons for Publication.
Axel Nelson and Emma Nelson, his wife,
palintiffs, vs. G. J. Dahl, known also
as Gust J. Dahl, defendant. —No. .
The State of Washington to the said
G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J.
Dahl, defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication of this summons, to
wit: within sixty days after the 23rd
day of August, 1912, and defend the
above entitled action In the above en
titled court, and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your
answer upon the undersigned attorney
for plaintiff at his office below stated;
and in case of your failure so to do,
judgment will be rendered against you
according to the demand of the com
plaint, which has been filed with the
clerk of said court. The object of the
above entitled action Is to obtain judg-
ment against this defendant on one
certain promissory note for one thou
sand dollars ($1,000), and interest there
on at 6 per cent from April 25th, 1910,
and to foreclose one certain mortgage,
of date April 28th, 1910, on the follow
ing real estate, to-wit, lots five (6), six
(6), seventeen (17), and »ighteen (18),
Steel Works Addition to West Seattle,
King County, Washington, which said
mortgage was given to secure said note.
A. J. ALLEN,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
P O. Address, 405-406 Eiler Bldg.,
Seattle, King County, Washington.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OP THE
State of Washington for King County.
Summons for Publication.
Axel Nelson and Emma Nelson, his wife,
plaintiffs, vs. G. J. Dahl, known also
as Gust J. Dahl, defendant. —No. .
The State of Washington to the said
G. J. Dahl, known also as Gust J.
Dahl, defendant:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication of this summons, to
wit: within sixty days after the 23rd
day of August, 1912, and defend the
above entitled action in the above en
titled court, and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of your
answer upon the undersigned attorney
for plaintiff at his office below stated;
and In case of your failure so to do,
judgment will be rendered against you
according to the demand of the com
plaint, which has been filed with the
clerk of said court. The object of th«
above entitled action is to obtain Judg
ment against this defendant on one cer
tain promissory note dated January 18,
1910, for the sum of seven hundred dol
lars ($700), with interest at 6 per cent,
and to foreclose mortgage, given to se
cure said note, on lot twelve (12), block
two (2), of Star Addition to West Seat
tle, King County, Washington, which
said mortgage was given to secure said
A. J. ALLEN,
Attorney for Plaintiff.
P. O. Address, 405-406 Eiler Bldg.,
Seattle, King County, Washington.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THI
State of Washington for King County.
Summons for Publication.
Schwabacher Hardware Company, a Cor
poration, plaintiff, vs. B. F. Zimmer
man, and Carroll Hayward Zimmer
man, his wife, and R. L. Hankinson,
and Jane Doe Hankinson, his wife,
defendants —No. 89294.
The State of Washington to the Bald
B. F. Zimmerman, and Carroll Hay
ward Zimmerman, his wife, and R. L.
Hankinson and Jane Doe Hankinson,
his wife, defendants:
You are hereby summoned to appear
within sixty days after the date of the
first publication of this summons, to
wit: Within sixty days after the 23rd
day of August, 1912, and defend the
above entitled action in the above en
titled court, and answer the complaint
of the plaintiff, and serve a copy of
your answer upon the undersigned at
torneys for plaintiff at their office be
low stated; and In case of your failure
so to do, judgment will be rendered
against you according to the demand
of the complaint, which has been filed
with the clerk of said court. The ob
ject of the above entitled action Is to
foreclose that certain mortgage given
by the defendants, B. F. Zimmerman
and Carroll Hayward Zimmerman, hla
wife, to Schwabacher Hardware Com
pany, a corporation, dated August 10,
1911. to secure the payment of the sum
of $2,500.00 one year after said date,
with interest at 8 per cent, and an at
torney's fee of $250.00, and for a de
ficiency judgment.
y LEOPOLD M. STERN &
J. W. RUSSELL,
Plaintiffs Attorney,
p O Address, 714 Lowman Building,
Seattle, King County, Washington.
August 23—October 4, 1912.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
State of Washington, in and for th«
County of King. In Probate.
In the Matter of the Estate of Edward
C. Heuss, Deceased. No. 14080. No
tice of Change of Administrator.
Notice is hereby given that Fritz H.
Huess, the Administrator of the above
entitled estate, has been removed, and
that Tillie Huess has been appointed
Administratrix of said estate in his
stead.
Creditors are hereby notified to pre
sent their claims against said estate to
said Administratrix at her place for the
transaction of business, to-wit: 1307
Hoge Building Seattle, Washington,
within one year from the date of the
notice to creditors previously published
to-wit*
TILLIE HUESS.
Administratrix De bonis non of the Es
tate of Edward C. Huess, Deceased.
Sept. 20 Oct. 5, 1912.
"On what grounds does your
father object to me?" he asked.
"On any grounds within a mile
of our house," she answered.
Byker—l attended a successful
sleight-of-hand performance last
night.
Pyker—ls that sot
Byker—Yes. I lent the conjur
or a counterfeit dollar-bill and
he gave me back a good one.
f

xml | txt