Search America's historic newspaper pages from 1756-1963 or use the U.S. Newspaper Directory to find information about American newspapers published between 1690-present. Chronicling America is sponsored jointly by the National Endowment for the Humanities external link and the Library of Congress. Learn more
Image provided by: South Dakota State Historical Society – State Archives
Newspaper Page Text
What is the matter? LITERARY DEPARTMENT ALL ARTICLES FOR THIS DEPARTMENT MUST BE IN NOT LATER THAN THE FIFTEENTH OF EACH MONTH TO INSURE PUBLICATION. CONTRIBUTIONS SIGNED HOW TO DETERMINE WHAT TO TEACH IN NATURE STUDY SERE is a general feeling concerning much of the work that passes as nature study in our schools that it is somewhat fragmentary in its character and that it tends to lead to nowhere in particular. It is held that it concerns itself too much with a multitude of little things that are more or less unrelated. In the study of any topic, a few more facts tacked on here or there, or left out entirely, is of little concern. There is no feeling of loss or inconsistency by teacher or pupil. The big thing to do is to observe and gather data, hoping in the meantime that all will be well in the end. In fact, the more little things brought together, the more educative is the proccss thought to be. Now, it is easy to fool one's self into thinking that such work contains the essential elements of value in the process of education. It breaks down in that it does not recognize the worth of discriminating as to relative values in dealing with the content side of nature-study Like the farmer's hayrack, the scheme of teaching nature-study referred to gathers everything that is in the way—hay, thistles, last year's stubble, roots, etc., and all passes as "hay." As the farmer occasionally discards a bull-thistle or root, so the tea cher may occasionally discard a few of the noxious things, but as a rule all is garnered and labeled, "hay," "nature-study," "educational food," "mental pabulum." As has been indicated, no standard the relative worth of subiect-matter is measured. There is no basis which •erves as guide in the selection of material. As a result the place of be ginning and ending is not clearly defined, consequently the teacher rambles here and there in her teaching. As a teacher she( is lauded and is pointed out as one having the ear-marks of an artist in the teacher's profession. If you doubt the truth of what has been said, it is suggested that you quietly •lip into several rooms where nature study is being taught and measure the worth of the work. As you observe, ask yourself such questions as: What is the center of recitation? Have teacher and pupils clearly defined their prob lems before making an attack? What is the aim that defines the work? What trig things will stand out in the minds of the pupils when they have gone over this work? To some this test may seem to be a little formal to apply to the mature-study of the lower grades, but to the writer the work must tear thift test if it is to be considered worth while. is used by which