Newspaper Page Text
Wilmington Wonting S’tar North Carolina’* Old**t Daily Newspaper Published Daily Except Sunday R. B. Page. Publisher__ Telephone Ail Depe^tment* 2-3311 Entered a* Second Class Matter at Wilming Son. N. C Postoffic# Unoei Act of Congress ol March 3, 1878._ SUBSCRIPTION RATES BY CARRIER IN NEW HANOVER COUNTY Payable Weekly or in Advance Combi Tim. Star News natior 1 Week ...» 30 * 25 » 50 1 Month l.» L» Jj» » Months - 3.00 3.25 ?•“ • Months -. 7 80 6.50 13.00 ! year . .. 15.60 13.00 26.00 (Above rates entitle subscriber to Sunday issue of Star-News) SINGLE COPY Wilmington News - 5C Morning Star • „ Sunday Star-News - 10c By Mail: Payable Strict!* in Advance 3 Months - * 2 50 »2.00 t 3.85 • Months - - 3 00 4.00 7 70 ! Year __ 10.00 8.00 15 40 (Above rates entitle subscriber to Sunday issue ol Star-News) _ WILMINGTON STAR (Daily Without Sunday) t Months—•’.85 6 Months—«3.70 1 Year—$7.40 MEMBER OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS The Associated Prea* is entitled exclusively t< the use for republication of all the local newf printed In this newspaper, as well as all AP new* dispatches. ____ THURSDAY, JULY 3, 1947 Star Program Slate ports with Wilmington favored in proportion with Its resources, to In clude public terminals, tobacco storage warehouses, ship repair facilities, near by sites for heavy industry and 35-foot Cape Fear river channel. City auditorium large enough to meet needs for years to come. Development of Southeastern North Carolina agricultural and industrial re sources through better markets and food processing, pulp wood production and factories. Emphasis on the region's recreation advantages and improvement of resort accommodations. Improvement of Southeastern North Carolina’s farm-to-market and primary roads, with a paved highway from Top sail inlet to Bald Head island. Continued effost through the City’s In dustrial Agency to attract more in dustries. Proper utilization of Bluethenthal air port for expanding air service. Development of Southeastern North Carolina’s health facilities, especially in counties lacking hospitals, and includ ing a Negro Health center Encouragement of the growth of com mercial fishing. Consolidation of City and County governments. GOOD MORNING Plants do not govern the soul, or guide the destinies of men, but trifles, lighter than straws are levers in the building up of char acter.—Tupper. Mail Delivery Reduction Wilmingtonians are confronted with reduced mail delivery service. When September rolls around heavy cuts will have had to be made in seventeen auxiliary routes, most of which were established when the population mount ed with the coming of war activities. Some routes will have to be abandoned, others now providing two daily deliv eries tvill have to be reduced to one. And still other routes Avill have to be lightened because overtime deliveries are ordered reduced by 50 per cent. Postal appropriations have been slashed to the extent that all post of fices must curtail delivery service. Wilmingtonians’ only consolation is that they have not been singled out for exclusive disfavor. Everybody will suf fer alike. Whether the Congress, in its pres ent economy move, has acted wisely toward the Post Office department is not for the layman to determine. But it might be considered, and brought i to the attention of Congress, that nearly one-half of the country’s busi ness is carried or through the mails, and that the heavy reductions made necessary in deliveries because of the lower appropriations might all too easily bring about an equally heavy reduction in the nation’s business transacted by mail, with the result that firms thus affected would face added difficulty in meeting income and other taxes. Government spending is unques tionably too high. The Congress is right in seeking ways to reduce the cost of government. At the same time legis lation that interferes with normal busi ness cannot be considered wise legis lation. Surely there are federal extravag ances that can be stopped without loss to business and with gain for the peo ple. Senator Byrd has pointed out dozens of economies that ought to be put into force. If they were, the postal services might have an adequate de livery program everywhere. Dollar Imperialism? Never Russia’s claim that the American proposal commonly known as the Mar shall Plan represents dollar imperialism is in line with all proposals affecting the peace and rehabilitation of Europe that does not originate in Moscow. It <■ as false as all other pronouncements eminating from Russian sources con cerning the purposes and policies of the United States. Secretary of State Marshall answers Mr. Molotov, the Soviet Foreign Com missar, who has blocked acceptance of the Marshall Plan at the three-nation conference in Paris, by laying down a four-plank platform disproving all that Mr. Molotov charges during an address before the National Womens Press club in Washington. American aid for Europe, he says “shall be effectively used for the pur pose for which it was intended. This puspose, as outlined in Mr. Marshall s Harvard speech, is the economic recon struction of countries willing to help themselves and for the relief of their impoverished people. The second plank is that the Ameri can aid should not be used for selfish economic or political interests.” The third plank specifies that it must be used to assist in economic rehabilita tion.” The fourth: that it should serve the purpose “of restoring hope and confidence among the people concerned that the world will know peace and se curity in the future.” How is it possible to lodge a charge of dollar imperialism against any of these planks ? The fact is that instead of dollar imperialism for this nation the aid proposed by the Marshall Plan, if extended at all, represents a dollar sacrifice for the American people, from whom must come every penny invested in the reconstruction and rehabilita tion of Europe. There is no good reason to believe that the Paris conference of Britain’s, Frances’s and Russia’s foreign minis ters will have promoted either peace in Europe or Europe’s recovery, and the blame will lie at Moscow’s gates. The outcome is liable to be a division of Europe into two spheres of influ ence—the eastern sphere under Rus sia’s domination, the western consist ing primarily of England, France and the part of Germany occupied by the United States, Great Britain and France. This prospect is tragic, chiefly be cause alterations in geographical fron tiers so easily lead to war. One of the worst blunders in the Versaille treaty was its shuffling of national boun daries. A Germany half communistic and half democratic would be a perfect incubator for war. Student—Veterans Hard Hit The GI Bill of Rights, which was first hailed as the economic salvation of veterans, is proving a dud, so far as higher education for former service men is concerned. The trouble may stem from the fact that the Bill of Rights was instituted before the war ended and did not (maybe could not) take into consideration the inflationary rise following the cessation of hostili ties. The City College of New York’s de partment of sociality has been studying the situation for six months. A report recently completed contains the find ings of a survey of living conditions of 267 married and single veterans and 25 nonveterans. Financial hardship, inadequate hous ing and discouragement of student veterans are outstanding features of the report. In most cases married veteran stu dents at college must spend $181.92 and the single student $84.95 a month to live. The married veteran receives a $90 allowance and the unmarried veteran $65 a month. Both face a monthly deficit. The report shows that for the most part this difference is made up by withdrawals of savings or the sale of war bonds. Some of the wives of veterans are able to secure full or part-time jobs. But, as the report points out, the average veteran’s savings cannot last much longer, nor can his war bonds. And, further, the purpose of creating a nest egg by holding on to bonds until they mature is defeated when they are cashed in. If savings and bonds go in full to sustain life while the vet terans are at school what are they to do when they receive their diplomas but lack jobs? It is not probable that veteran-stu dents will unite in a petition to have GI allowances increased sufficiently to pay for their total support. But the re port adds that many queried feel that a minimum of $119.18 for married veterans and $92.60 for single veterans would help them ‘make ends meet.” If revision of the GI Bill of Rights should be considered the fact that col lege or university training would bet ter enable veterans to face the prob lems of civilian life ought to be an argument for increasing these allow ances. jdKu Surplus In Treasury The fiscal year ended with a sur plus in the United States Treasury. Two months ago President Truman thought it might be all of $1,250,000, 000. Instead, five days before July 1, it totaled $1,142,825,000, and on the last day of the year this was reduced by an interest payment on the $257, 700,000,000 national debt topping $500, 000,000. Thus it drops below the billion riiark, but will be reinforced in part from quarterly income taxes that fell due on June 16. The exact amount is not available, but any surplus, certainly one nearing ten figures, encourages the hope that Congress will repass the tax reduction bill and pass it again if President Tru man should again veto it. As Pegler Sees It BY WESTBROOK PEGLER (Copyright by King Features Syndicate, Inc.) NSW YORK,—There is absolutely no doubt that other new dealers besides Henry Wal lace and his protege. Louis L. Horch, were friendly to the projects of Nicholas Konstan tin Roerich, the mystical guru or master spirit. Morris Leopold Ernst, of New York, a law yer, is a new dealer. He was associated with Heywood Broun, in the organization of the American Newspaper Guild, particularly in the New York chapter, which, ever since those founding days, has been heavily infest ed with a plague of communist. Broun, an inveterate sampler, was confirmed a Catholic shortly before he died. Before that, however, he had been a left wing socialist, ant had openly collaborated with the communists al though he never was honest or brave enough to be frankly one of them. Not that it mat ters except as it may effect your opinion o! his character and strength. He had also prac ticed nudism. One of his colleagues in the Heeding heart profession said of Broun that he had worshipped at all shrines. Morris L. Ernst’s biography in Who’s Who in America says he was bom in Uniontown, Ala., in 1888, and got his AB from Williams and his law degree from New York Law school. From 1909 to 1911, he was a shirt* manufacturer. From 1911 to 1915 his business was “retail furniture,” in 1915 he joined the law firm of Grenbaum, Wolff and Ernest, in New York. ' Since then has been "attor ney for American Newspaper Guild: Served as arbiter for Mayor la Guarlda in taxicab strike, 1934 (a racket strike in which union gangsters terrorized New York while the best police force in the world appeared to be fear ful and helpless, ed); drafted legislation for Gov. Lehman (new deal-Roosevelt governor of New York, ed) on ins. and banking mat ers; Mem. N. Y. state banking board since inception by App’t. Gov’s. Roosevelt and Leh man.” He also wrote several books including ‘ Sex Life of the Unmarried Adult” and “Ul timate Power” and is a lexturer before clubs and colleges.” I find no record of any war service in the first war. Henry Wallace also was busy otherwise. What is the guiding thought of this not at all bashful nomine for greatness, who has exercised a very strong influence in the con duct of one union whose bosses constantly extolled and appeased Moscow and persecut ed many loyal American newspaper workers; who drafted legislation on insurance and banking matters and held an influential posi tion on the board in control of banking in the state of New York? What is his attitude toward insurance and banking, these indis pensable institutions of the capitalist system ernment? Is he friendly to that avstem? What which underlies the American form of gov ernment? Is he friendly to- that system? What sort of preaching would club members and politically callow college students hear from Morris Leopold Ernst? I would hesitate to note again particularly that this philosopher and covert director of our destiny comes to u? from the shirt and furnitire trades but for the fact that many of his own political col leagues often disqualified me on the ground that I was a sport-writer. I seem to have ben more successful at writing sports than Morris Leopold Ernst was at hiring others to sew shirts for him, and at selling sofas to newlyweds on the honored if sometimes melancholy chattel-mortgage plan. What is this new dealer’s attitude toward capitalism? For information on this point I cite a letter from a court record. Tie case was one in which Louis L. Horch, a back-slid new deal disciple of Nicholas Kon stantin Roerich, was grabbing back posses sion of the 24-story lamasery on Riverside Drive known as the Roerick Museum and Master institute. The term “master” runs! through the projects and literature of Roer ick’s cleverly publicized career in mysticism, occultism, esoteric Buddhism and new deal ism in New York early in the Roosevelt era. He was regarded by some of his cultists as a “master intellect” and a “supernormal spirit.” Horch has frankly said that as Father Divine was God Almighty in his cult whose lamaseries were called heavens, so Roerich was God Almighty to his followers. Ernst's legal role in the liti gaitonevi ership of the temple is not to be explained in a few lines, but he war at one time for Roerich. This letter from the court record is done on the letterhead of Grenbaum, Wolff and Ernst. It is dated Feb. 15, 1933. It was ad dressed to Roerich at Naggar, Kulu, Punjab, India, which is the guru’s address as given in Who’s Who in America. ' “My dear Professor Roerich,” it says. “In behalf of my partners and myself I want to cordially thank you for your letter of .Tan. 7, expressing your gratification with our efforts in behalf of the Roerich museum. As capital dwindles in importance it may well be that cultural movements will get into the ascendancy. There is no doubt in my mind but that these two movements, (capital ism and the "cultural” movements (capital ticed by Roerich, ed) are angagonistic to each other at present. With kind regards to you. Sincerely yours, (signed) Ernst.” I will present some other new dealers in tnis strange society. Thehe will be Henry Mor genthau’s father, the old boy who was the \mbassador to Turkey and seems to have picked up some ideas on religion and fate in the near east. There will be Senator Bob Wagner, with a tantalizing expression of in timacy with the circle. And there will be a comic note in the association of Sol Bloom, tne New York new deal congressman who came on to be chairman of our House Com mitte on Foreign Affairs. As snug as bugs m a rug at the guru’s lamasery on Riverside drive while the naive and unsuspecting Amer icans were going to ordinary brick and wood church houses on Sunday and prayer-meeting and vespers, never suspecting that dark forces of the Himalayas were hexing and be witching them and rendering them incapable of unity and sound political action. To close today’s lesson. I offer a take-home t lougnt about the new deal shirt-maker, this ruler of the banking and insurance systems of New York. This adviser of Roosevelt and Lehman, noting a decline of capitalism in the United States. I call attention to his “kind regards” to the boss of an oriental and Rus sian cultural movement notwithstanding the fact that Ernst recognized the antagonism of inis foreign force to the economic system "ndcrlving the American form r* "-.nra,,,,). “LABOR RELATIONS BOARD” coetiBi&P » Youe }MOV£[ The Book Of Knowledge (Department:— THE UNITED STATES) WHY AMERICANS CELEBRATE 4TH OF ULY The 4th of July is celebrated in the United States because it was on that date in 1776 that Congress adopted the Declaration of Inde pendence, proclaiming the inde pendence of the thirteen original colonies and separating them from England. The adoption of the Declaration was not a sudden act. For ten years the colonists had ben ac tively resisting King George III and the British Parliament, chief ly because of taxes levied on them. They believed that Parlia ment had no right to tax them, since they had no voice in Parli ament. The cry, “No taxation without representation,” had been heard up and down the land. In 1774 and 1775, elected dele gates from the colonies had met in the first two Continental Con gresses in defiance of British rule. In 1775, blood had been shed in battles with British troops at Lex ington, Concord and Bunker Hill. An American army had been or ganized under George Washing ton. Ticonderoga and Montreal had been captured from the Brit ish, Quebec had been attacked, and Boston had been besieged. Despite all this, the colonies were slow to move for absolute independence, but by the spring of 1776, the belief that separation was necessary had grown strong er. One by one, various colonies declared for independence. Then, on June 7, 1776, Richard Henry Lee of Virginia offered a resolution in Congress “that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states.” Action was postponed for three weeks in order that the del egates might hear from home. On July 2, the resolution was taken up in the Committee of the Whole. Nine states voted to adopt it. New York was excused, as its Scene in Congress in 1776 as John Hancock, president of Congress, receives the Declaration of Independence from committee appointed to draft it. The committeemen are (left to right) John Adams, Roger Sherman, Robert Livingston, Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Frank lin. The Declaration was adopted on July 4, but only Hancock signed it on that day. This famous picture, painted by John Trumbull, hangs in the Capitol at Washington. delegates had no instructions; Delaware was divided; only South Carolina and Pennsylvania were opposed. The next day, July 3, Congress met in regular session and the three states last named voted formally with the nine in favor of the resolution. Meanwhile, on June 11, a com mute consisting of Thomas Jef ferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman and Robert Livingston had been ap pointed to draw up a declaration of the reasons for separation. The document itself was the work of Jefferson, though a few correc tions were made by other mem bers of the committee, and a few amendments by Congress. On July 4, the Declaration was adopted by the vote of twelve states, but it was signed on that date only by John Hancock, presi dent of Congress. Later, the docu ment was engrossed on parchment and, on August 2, this copy was Lewis Vs. Taft-Hartley Act-II BY PETER EDISON WASHINGTON, — Biggest point of debate among lawyers studying the new Taft-Hartley Labor Law is how the courts can frame an injunction to stop the coal industry tie-up now threatened. The courts can’t compel anyone to work if he doesn’t want to. The Constitution says so. And the con tract between the Unied Mine Workers Union and the mine own ers ended June 30. So the courts can’t order the miners to go back to work under previous working conditions as to hours and pay. But assume for the sake of argu ment that the courts can get around these obstacles by dicta ting the terms of a new contract of the judges’ own devising or by ordering 1he miners to return to work under terms of the expired Krug-Lewis contract. Under the Tan-Hartley law this injunction may run for only 60 days, while labor and manage ment try to make a new contract. At the end of 60 days the Presi dent could call back his Board of Inquiry. This Board would then make public the employer’s last offer of settlement. Within 15 days the National Labor Relations Board would have to conduct an election to see if a majority of the employes wanted to accept this final offer. This election would cost the government about $180, 000. If a majority of the miners voted to acoept, the contract would be drawn up on such terms. If they voted against accepting, within the next five days the at torney general would have to ask the courts to dissolve the injunct ion. Thus 80 days after the in junction was first granted the miners would be free to go out on strike again. The Taft-Hartley law woulj then require the President to report the situation to Congress. If Congress didn’t happen to be in session at at that time—say about Oct. 1—no body seems to know just what would happen. At this point, suppose the mine owners »0 t$v <n >-o the strike. The owners could ask their old employes to return to work. If the old employes didn’t choose to do so the mine operator could hire new workers and the miners who didn’t come back to work would lose their rights. With a new working force the employers would be free to break away from the industry-wide bar gaining agreements formerly sign ed with John L. Lewis. Mine owners might also try to break away from the union shop, which requires all employes to join the union. These conditions would put the coal industry on an open-shop basis, with bargaining by regions or by state, local or individual company units. If these changes could be put over, the power of the union would be broken and John L. Lewis would be licked. But suppose that the new em ployes goj together in a new local union of the United Mine Workers and decided* to bargain. Since the United Mine Workers Union had not been certified as bargaining agent under the Taft Hartley Act, the first step would be to hold another NLRB election. This would take another month. First tile union would have to register with the Secretary of Labor under the Taft-Hartley Act provisions. The union would have to certify that none of its officers was a Communist, file full finan cial reports, and certify that copies had been furnished all its members. Then the union would have to get 30 per cent of the employes of the unit to sign petitions des ignating the United Mine Workers Union as bargaining agent. In the meantime, a lot of secondary issues would have to be settled: status of foremen, super visory employes, professional em ployes, agreement on checkoff, how to deal with non-member em ployes. All of these decisions would be subject to court review. A mini mum of six months might be re quired to restart collective bar* signed by all the members of Con gress who were present, including those from New York, who had not previously voted. Strictly speaking, independence was declared, not on July 4, but on July 2 and July 3, when Con gress voted for Lee’s resolution, the formal Declaration was adopt ed on July 4. The parchment copy of the Declaration is now kept in the Department of State. (Copyright, 1946, by the Grolier Society Inc., based upon the Book of Knowledge) (Distributed by United Feature Syndicat, Inc.) Tomorrow:—What Is a Rivr Dl ta? FOR THE COMMON DEFENSE Importance of the Panama Canal to the security not only to the country but of the whole hemisphere from destruction by any power its military defense must be provided for, in peace as well as in war. The new agreement with the Republic of Panama proposed by the state department for the con tinued use of certain bases in Panamanian territory recognizes that fact. During the war the United States armed forces occupied, under agreement with Panama, 134 areas outside the 10-mile-wide Canal Zone. Thirty-six of these, mainly technical installations es sential to safe air navigation, are still in Use. United States bases for protec tion of the canal help defend the integrity of all the American states and threaten none. They are used for joint security, not single-handed aggression. — Phila delphia Inquirer. The Doctor Says— ALCOHOLICS NEED CARE IN HOSPITAI By WILLIAM A. O’BRIEN m. a Treatment of delirium tremen which results from excessive ',' dulgence in alcohol, is fi life-sa”’ ing emergency. Unless proJ‘ treatment is given pro rn r . j " death may result. The acute effects of alcoliol * the nervous system tend ;0 (j:’ appear when drinking is stoppe*' As patient needs help durin? tv critical period, hospital care at* gcod nursing are important, v the past many hospitals did *5 admit alcoholics, but more i them are doing so now as ^ appreciate that alcoholisn, .s , illness. In delirium tremens treating, alcohol should be stoppea dt on.' I as gradual withdrawal is nor a< visable. Drugs are given t0 p ' duce sleep and to relax the patie'a. j while this is done. Many of -w are so afraid of the things thej see and hear that they may t-. to do something desperate order to escape. Injections of glucose and insulin may be life saving. Patients US11, ally have not been eating for so^ time, and the body is in a danger, cus state. As the patient quietj down, salt water can be injected ty vein to correct the dehydration Thiamin chloride and ricotinij acid are given in large doses j, correct the deficiency state which 1 results from starvation. Patients with delirium tremerj should be kept in a warm bed a quiet place. The room should I either be brightly lighted or J total darkness in order to avoid] shadows as *hey may can;. | serious alarm. Attendants shouldf be kind, sympathetic, and under, standing since patients experience] great remorse when recovery be gins. Patients with delirium tremens i usually are discharged from ft, hospital too soon. Most paSji-t, who fall down again are those u!*, have not been given sufficient time to recover. If patients are kept in a little longer, this give them an opportunity to bi visited by Alcoholics Anonymo., representatives who will help them after they leave. Question: Which foods are ml*, able for a person with epilepsy in a rundown condition? Answer: Foods suitable for aw one underweight can be given to an epileptic patient. One variev of epilepsy, seems t0 improvt when the patient is given a die:, which contains an excess of fa' McKENNEY On Bridge ♦ AJ62 ¥ 10 7 2 ♦ K95 *874 * K 9 ¥ 653 * Q 1071 * AK62 ♦ 53 ¥ AKQJ84 ♦ A863 ♦ Q Rubber—E-W vul South West North Cast 1 ¥ Pass 1 * Pass 3 ¥ Pass 4 ¥ Pass Opening—* J 1 BY WILLIAM E. McKENNEl America’s Card Authority Written For NEA Service This is the fourth of a ser es o' simple plays which too mas; people miss. To get the full bene fit of today’s problem I am going to ask you to cover up the Easi and West hands. You are sitting in the South P* sition and your contract is ior hearts. You lose the opening lest to East’s king of clubs, and I° ruff the ace of clubs. If you are careless, you nor take three rounds of trumps, and then try out the diamonds, die covering that they do not break As a result, you lose two dii' monds, a spade and a club The correct procedure is to plf only one round of trumps, flies | cash the ace and king of diamond and lead another diamond. tbi side that wins the third diamonsg may have another' trump to lea* but you can win it and still hav!|* a trump in dummy to rut‘ your losing diamond. If you take even two rounds * trumps, the player who wins feg third round of diamonds may ha" | the one remaining adverse trunk ; and lead it. Then you cannot rJ the losing diamond in dummy. 1 While it is generally true it pays to pick up the opponent!’, trumps, here is a case where side suit must be led first^l WHY WE SAY ky IT AN J. COLLINS ILi S LARSON " OYSTER COCKTAIL" , The oyster cocktail is attributed to an unknown miner who first ordered it at a California bar. He asked the bartendf t for a plate of oysters and then niixod them in a glass with catsup, pepf** and Worcester sauce. The bartend'r followed suit and sold the new disk tnerearter. co«p tmwop.lb »isht»