Daily Kennebec journal. [microfilm reel], September 20, 1870, Image 2

About Daily Kennebec journal. [microfilm reel] (Augusta, Me.) 1870-1975

Image provided by: Maine State Library

                
jiailj Jicmiflift lournal.
AVGUSTA,
TTJBSlJAr MORNING, SEPT. 26, 1870.
COMPLETE RETVRSS.
We give in thiu issue the complete re
turns of the State, with a few unimportant
exceptions. They are gathered trom the
official records and carefully copied. 1 he
result is more favorable to the republican
ticket than the most sanguine anticipated. |
Our figures were the highest in the State j
on the night of the election, and Pelham’s j
majority has outrun even them, in brief,
the result is as follows:
Perham's vote ,>4,051
Roberts’ 45.176
Total vote, 99,227
Perham's majority, 8,87.\>
The total vote last year was but 93,858
and Chamberlain's majority was only 7,
983.
But the vote for Perham does not show
the full strength of the republican vote
cast. In some localities he runs behind
his ticket. This was effected by the Rob
erts-Chamberlain combination as fore
shadowed liefore election in some of the
papers favorable to the movement. It is so
in Oxford county, where Perham loses some
150 votes, and where there is not a shadow
of pretence for attributing the loss to any
other cause. Mr. Perham's popularity in
his native county is beyond dispute, ami
the only cause for surprise at the result
is that with a combination of.so dangerous
a character established in all the towns
around him where it was possible to make
it operate his vote was not reduced more.
A correspondent of the Argus stated in
that paper before election that the game of
selling Perham out for Chamberlain repre
sentatives in Oxford county would be
played, and for once the Argus told the
truth.
With so many elements to distract the par
ty, and with downright treachery at work to j
advance the Chamberlain interest, we have
won one of the most signal, important ami
satisfactory victories ever achieved in a
State election.
the pout land ad vertiser and.
THE SENATORIAL CONTEST.
The Portland Advertiser of Saturday
contains an artiele on the Senatorial con
test which is sufficiently remarkable to
call for a review. Some of its statements
indeed are sufficiently groundless to call
for a flat denial,—a denial which does not
carry with it the charity of supposing that
tiie Advertiser erred through ignorance.
Take this paragraph for instance in which
the italics are our own :
“There has been an earnest effort to bring
the question before the voters of the pnrly.
From them a disinterested decision was to he
expected, and they have decided. Wherever
their decision liras respected, they hare given
vs Republican gains. Wherererthc majority
have preferred Morrill, there has been a ready
acquiescence."
The Advertiser absolutely shows genius
in crowding so much misstatement into so
small a space. Did not Chamberlain's
supporters carry the Representative Cau
cus in Bangor and Lewiston, and was not
the choice promptly acquiesced in by the
friends of Air. Morrill, without an attempt
at separate or hostile action? And yet in
both places, always heretofore Republican
strongholds, the Democrats elected their
tickets by triumphant majorities. Are
these the “Republican gains” of which the
Advertiser speaks ? A democratic net
gain of eleven hundred votes over last
year, furnishes Bangor’s endorsement of
the truth of the Advertisers statement as
to the strength of the “Chamberlain move
ment” in that section.
Following this line of statement, the
Advertiser with an audacious disregard of
truth which does credit to its courage, pro
ceeds to say that ''wherever the majority
have preferred Morrill, there ha% been a
ready acquiesence." The Advertiser knows
this is not so. In Gardiner in the largest
Republican Caucus ever held in that city,
Mr. Palmer"was nominated for re-election
by a decisive majority. The Republican
friends of Gov. Chamberlain, aided by
some Democrats who lunl sneaked into this
Caucus of three hundred and fifty voters,
were fairly beaten. Did they exhibit that
“ready acquiesence” of which the Adver
tiser boasts? Not at all! When beaten
they Receded from the Caucus, nominated
Mr. Moore, the same man just defeated by
Air. Palmer, united with the Democrats
ana were routed at the polls. In \\ iutkrop
Mr. May, the efficient and intelligent Hep-!
resentative of last year, was nominated :
iir n Republican Caucus by a highly com- i
plimeutary majority over Dr. Snow, the I
friend of Gov. Chamberlain. Did tin- ;
friends of the General show their “ready
acquiesenee ?” No. As in Gardiner they
ictired, bulled from the Republican Caucus,
united with the Democrats and elected Dr.
Snow over the regular Republican nom
inee. And immediately following his !
election, the bolting Republicans and !
their associate Democrats held a meeting !
tc rejoice over their joint victory, and the I
principal Democratic speaker boasted
that Chamberlain was to be sent to the
Senate of the United States and the radical :
Republicans stripped of their power.
Could absolute disregard of party fealty
and the common laws of parly honor go I
further .* Had these friends of Gov. Cham
berlain refused to go into tlie Caucus and
openly proclaimed a union with the Dem
ocrats in advance, their conduct might
have pleaded the apology of being open
aud avowed. They did no such thing.
They claimed to lx; true and loyal Repub
licans and as such exercised their right of
participating in die party council and
thus avowed their purpose to abide its re
sults. No such honorable action marked
their doings. On the contrary so soon as
they found themselves in a minority, they
deserted their standard and formed rela
tions aud alliances wiili the enemy.
Aud it was so, nay worse and more :
shameful, in Portland, under the Advertis
er's own eyes, and with its advice, conni
vance and assistance. One readers, we
trust will not object to some of the details
of this Portland Caucus. The nominating
delegate convention was composed of
twenty-eight friends of Senator Morrill j
an<l twenty-one supporters of Governor
Chamberlain. Thus it will bo observed
that the delegates friendly to Morrill had
complete control ol the meeting to nomi
nate, won after an open and vigorous can
vas between the friends of the two Sena
torial candidates, in the different wards of
the city. The rights of Gov. Chamber
lain's friends to any of the representative
nominees were thus exhausted, and they j
could only rely on the magnanimity of the ;
majority. The friends of Senator Morrill,
regardful of the usages of the party, anx
ous to promote harmony and guarantee
success, generously renominated Messrs.
Bonney and Burgess bj acclamation, on the
ground of usage and the interest of the
party, well knowing these two gentlemen
were understood to prefer Gov. Chamber
lain. The other two nominees were
considered and understood to favor the
re-election of Senator Morrill. The
nominations were made openly, fairly,
according to party usage, and there were
no personal or political objections to the
candidate’s friendly to Mr. Morrill. These
nominations were declared to be unani
mous. Did this action command a “ready
acquiescence” from the friends of Govern
or Chamberlain ? Far from it. For after
this almost unparalleled magnanimity of
the triends ef Senator Morrill in thus di
viding the ticket, the leading supporters ot
Gov. Chamberlain in Portland, under the
inspiration of the Advertiser, relused to
support the republican nominees supposed
to be friendly to Senator Morrill. With a
base betrayal of their party, which is al
most incredible, they sought an alliance
with the democrats. They betrayed and
deserted the republican standard and elect
ed two democrats who would support Gov.
Chamberlain, instead of the two republi
cans who, they feared would favor Mr.
Morrill. Further, they were careful it is
SUKI, to nave il msum i miuuMiuium^ »»mi j
the democratic nominees on the point of
specially pledging them to the Chamber
lain coalition. It is said that Mr. Charles
p. Kimball, by far the ablest man on the
democratic ticket, would not pledge him
self to Chamberlain and was therefore not
taken. The Advertiser can perhaps say
whether this is true or not, and if it has
not the requisite information, probably the
Argus can supply it. Both papers are
equally zealous in supporting Chamberlain
for the Senatorship.
We might adduce numerous instances in
different parts of the State, as in Bethel,
Bridgton, Buckfield, Pamariscotta, where
the promoters of the “Chamberlain move
inent”exhibited the most flagrant disregard
of all honorable party obligations, or
“ready acquiescence.” Indeed, for the
year past, it lias been the habit of the pe
culiar supporters of Chamberlain, includ
ing the Portland Advertiser, to give ten
heavy blows to the Republican party, to
one small slap at the Democracy. At the
Bar.gor State convention last year, the
friends of Gov. Chamberlain openly pro
claimed that if he was not nominated there,
he would be placed before the people at
once by an independent movement, in
which the democratic party were to co-op
erate under the manipulation and leader
ship of Gen. Chamberlain's intimate friend,
Hon. Bion Bradbury. How far the Gov. :
waS personally involved iu such design is :
best known to himself and Mr. Bradbury, j
but it is very certai n that his friends and j
spokesmen very generally announced and ]
boasted of such a purpose.
And so the present year. The Govern
ors friends, including the Portland Adver
tiser, ntaile the distinct menace that the
nomination of Gen. Horsey would not be
acquiesced in, and the understanding was '
generally proclaimed by the Gov.’s pecul
iar “body guard” that in the event of Iler
sey’s nomination, the Governor would ac
cept the nomination from an “independent!
movement” in which the democracy would
concur. Nor indeed was the “independ
ent movement" with Gov. Chamberlain at
its head, given up until it become evident i
that it would prove abortive. The Demo
crane c onvention wnten met in romanct,
June 20th, vras adjurned to Bangor Aug. j
Kith, under the management of Hon. Bion
Bradbury, Geo. F. Emery and other skilled
leaders of thedemoeracy, who gave paitial
and public assurances on the platform of
the Convention, and made wonderful pri
vate promises in its corridors, of what
would lie done by the independent bolting
republicans under the lead of Gov. Cham
berlain. The “movement” died out, but
not until several notable conferences had
been held at the Falmouth Hotel, between
leading democrats and certain republicans
who will not be very conspicuous in lead
ing hereafter. It is a noteworthy fact that
the Falmouth Hotel conferees of both po- ]
litical parties are now cordially united in
support of Gov. Chamberlain for the Unit
ed States Senate.
'Fhe Portland Advertiser constantly
speaks of a great popular movement
among the Republicans for Gov. Cham
berlain. This is tlie merest fiction and
figment of the imagination. There is not I
a particle of ground for the assertion or
the assumption. The only two meetings
that have been held in the Stato to pro
mote his interests were at Portland and
Bangor and they were signally unsuccess
ful. They were got up by a canvass as
laborious as that made by the census-taker,
by importunately obtaining sundry names
to a paper anti privately begging the sign
ers to be present. With all this labor and
all these appliances, the meetings were sin
gularly destitute of spirit or of influence.
They were chiefly remarkable for an ab
sence of true Republican fealty, loyalty
and enthusiasm. The chairman of the
Portland meeting marie an address re
markable only for its assaults upon the
Administration of General Grant, while
the chief spokesman at Bangor, an ap
pointee of Gov. Chamberlain, exhausted
his idea of political anil party eulogy by
offering to produce a statement, possibly
a certificate, from the Chairman of the
Democratic State Committee to the effect
that Gov. Chamberlain had never confer
red with him about selling out the Repub
lican party or running in opposition to it.
In Kennebec we have supported Gen.
Chamberlain for Governor in convention
and election, four times, always with cor
diality and we think with some influence.
But we supported him as a Republican.
To unite with his senatorial supporters we
are invited simply to a coalition of a small
band of discontented Republicans with
scheming Democrats. Under such cir
cumstances the election of Gov. Chamber
lain is the defeat of the Republican party,
known to be such and designed to be such.
Hence we oppose it! When Gen. Cham
berlain won his honors on the field he
wore the true blue uniform. Ilis triumphs
in his Gubernatorial campaigns have been
won with the same color. When he dons
the grey in politics he can no more hope
to retain the support he has hitherto en
joyed than he could have hoped to lead the
20th Maine in a Confederate Uniform.
And especially will he fail when lie under
takes to combine the colors. They can't
be mixed in harmony. They are dis
tinct, palpable, striking, and can be rec
ognized at any distance, and under any
concealment. The effort to unite them as
in Portland, with one leg blue and the
other leg grey, has produced a uniform
or rather dwofonn, in which the straight
forward and honest Republicans ot Maine
will not consent to clothe themselves. To
march to a Republican victory in such a
dress, or rather in such a disguise, is a po
litical impossibility!
The late J. T. l'ompily, one of the most
distinguished writers on the subject of insur
ance in the country, was formerly a citizen of
Auburn, Maine, where his father still lives.
The Auburn City Government has voted to
purchase a hand steam fire engine witlt neces
sary hose, &c., and appropriated 85,500 to
pay for it.
MAINE ELECTION.
[ conriLitii rroM orficiAL rrtcr.is]
COUNTY Of ANDROSCOGGIN.
1869. 1870.
a
'3
™ p . .
Town,. | i | | |
-a 9 s Ju 3
O c/i « ftw 3
Auburn, 443 353 186 547 445
Durham, 1*25 1*25 41 138 135
East Livermore, 69 27 15 85 51
Greene, 95 85 9 103 74
Lewiston, 681 272 77 624 699
Lisbon, 216 70 — 164 68
Leeds, 109 103 51 136 114
Livermore, 151 104 32 164 119
Minot, 155 127 30 145 140
Poland, 220 158 1C 250 194
Turner, 235 243 57 260 262
Wales, 36 54 2 44 64
Webster, 78 31 15 83 34
COUNTY OF AROOSTOOK.
Amity, 25 37 - 24 34
Bridgewater, 18 30 - 24 30
Dalton, 29 25
Easton, 47 13 16 44 11
Fort Fairfield, 219 64
llodgdon, 83 53 - 67 63
llotmon, 223 95 4 240 135
Limestone, 28 6
Linneus, 75 67 - 6G 71
Littleton, 42 17 4 68 26
Ludlow, 27 23 - 23 14
Lyndon, 82 108 - SO 103
Mars Hill, 6 29 4 16 30
Masnrdis, 22 5 5 23 2
Maysville, 66 26 1 G3 20
Monticello, 45 20 10 37 15
New Limerick, 21 28 - 32 28
Orient, 14 6 - 16 14
Presque Isle, 107 21 3 123 24
Sherman, 69 50
Smyrna, 20 4 - 22 5
Washbnrn, 77 - 1 56 4
Weston, 34 28 - 40 32
Alva plantation, 3 4 30 48 9
Bancroft plantation 12 15 - 20 8
Benedicla plan., - 38 - 51
Castle Hill plan., 7 21
Crystal plantation, 35 15 - 2'J 11
Dayton plantation, 9 11 - 13 8
Haynesville plan., 4 7 - 4 8
Islaud Kails plan, 40 4 35 2
Mapleton plan., 23 5
Moro plan., 11 15 - 8 16
No. 11, R 1 plan., 15 16
Oukfield plan., 39 21
Perhaiu plan , 13 1 10 20 -
Westfield plan., 4 3 4 6 7
Woedland plan., 9 18
Silver Ridge, 4 9 - 6 8
COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND.
Baldwin, 117 in 'J i«
Biidgton, 241 199 24 278 234
Brunswick, 397 246 6 394 246
Cape Elizabeth, 234 190 58 307 223
Cason, 62 73 18 92 90
Cumberland, 102 120 17 117 llo
Falmouth, 105 141 37 145 145
Freeport, 255 119 12 220 147
Gorham, 380 291 17 356 240
Gray, 151 205 II 158 202
Uarpsweil, 96 127 2 98 111
llirrison. 117 101 C 126 117
Naples, 110 148 - 104 133
New Gloucester, 216 117 10 172 lib
North Yarmouth, 109 49 1 121 66
Otisfield, 155 82 4 166 96
Portland, 1814 848 139 2153 1743
Pown&l, 85 82 30 118 113
Raymond, 88 114 19 96 130
Sc.trboiough, 63 148 2 98 187
tabtgo, 70 83 104 88
Staudish, 233 219 6 236 178
Westbrook, 370 338 35 627 540
Windham, 214 177 15 2-2 191
Yarmouth, 166 124 3 183 164
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN.
Aron, 60 53 - 51 58
Carthage, 44 37 1 32 46
Ch'-sterville, 116 55 10 95 62
Furmiugton, 318 183 41 405 245
Freeman, 56 75 - 39 84
Industry, 67 72 5 57 81
Jay, 152 109 6 140 118
Kingfield, 47 65 5 52 61
Madrid, 28 33 - 38 50
New Sharon, 217 95 - 207 87
New Vineyard, 70 188 2 63 124
Phillips, 175 92 4 180 111
Rangely, 27 25 - 30 25
Salem, 31 35 - 25 43
Strong, 108 53 4 90 37
Temple, 84 63 1 85 70
Weld, 148 95 10 111 106
Wilton, 217 98 44 214 99
Carrabaesett, 2 5
Eustis plan., 23 17 1 15 4
Letter K plan., 5 15
Perkins plantation, 13 15
Raugely plan., 5 3
No. 6, 2 9 3 6
Dallas plan., 3 16
Sandy Hirer plan., 1 16 - 3 14
Washington plan., 6 4
Coplin plan., 3 11
Lang plan., — ^
Green Vale, 6 3
COUNTY OF HANCOCK.
Amherst, 35 31 - 27 42
Aurora, 13 19 - 14 24
1869. 1870.
6
5
*C a
Towna. | m I § f
S £ -g -S-®
as g .3 s o
U CO B 6. cs
Bluehill, 145 86 26 164 73
Brooklyn, 91 36 6 86 34
BrooksviUe, 111 74 13 48 81
Buoksport, 278 188 20 297 233
Castine, 107 53 14 104 60
Cranberry Isles, 19 29 2 22 21
Deer Isle, 70 176 32 109 184
bedbatu, 55 20 - 47 26
Eastbrook, 20 12 - 21 IS
Eden, 80 70 1 79 69
Ellsworth, 368' 176 17 440 379
Franklin, 79 42 14 110 41
Gouldsborough, 118 120 2 135 124
Hancock, 70 46 13 73 54
Lumoine, 52 39
Matiaville, 42 11 - 33 26
•Mount Desert, 66 46 - 56 55 j
Orland, 175 102 13 183 136
Otis, 30 6 8 41 3 1
Penobscot, 89 101 17 83 120
Sedgwick, 112 54 4 96 66
Sullivan, 77 72
Surry, 84 C3 - 69 88
Treinont, 109 84 - 113 95
Trenton, 86 72 1 31 49
Waltbaur, 42 17 - 57 18
Verona, 4 10 - 6 39 j
Swan Island, 8 12 1
No. 7, 2 121
No. 10, 3 - 1
No. 21 M. D., 1 9 I
No. 33, M. !>., 1 17 |
COUNTY OF KENNEBEC.
Albion, 119 120 33 123 135
Augusta, 842 499 54 724 587
Belgrade, 143 143 22 147 184
Benton, 138 139 3 126 136
Chelsea, 73 34 2 54 25
China, 189 138 29 253 163
Clinton, 163 170 11 165 173
Fanuingdale, 73 68 4 56 60
Fayette, 118 39 3 89 46
Gardiner, 317 191 100 507 188
llullowell, 220 96 30 259 100
Litchfield, 2ul 5G 7 153 55
•Manchester, 50 17 18 77 13
Monmouth, 201 110 22 186 115
Mt. Vernon, 180 66 6 191 60
Pittstnn, 189 189 11 156 143
Kea (field, 161 68 19 136 61
Home, 55 58 - 70 53
kidney, 187 122 16 161 11.3 |
Vessalborougb, 286 143 98 243 183
Vienna, 85 44 3 60 38
Waterville, 289 205 159 538 239
Wayne, 113 46 16 103 42
W eat Gardiner, 123 44 10 121 40
Windsor, 104 104 3 93 109
Wiiuoow, 165 92 17 18.1 IIS;
Winihrop, 211 106 73 307 193;
Clinton Gore, 19 16 j
Unity plan , 5 9
COUNTY OP KNOX.
Appleton, 1‘23 165 10 118 175
Camden, 356 310 28 333 370
Cushing, 27 84 - 21 70
Friendship, *30 84 2 30 86
Hope. 83 50 21 117 58
North II »ven, 62 55 - 68 57
Rockland, 502 453 20 630 302
South Tbumaston, 03 08 126 75
St. George. 35 216 31 101
Thomuston, 154 317 19 177 355
Union, 173 170 23 204 1*0
V.nalharen, 106 140 11 120 159
Warren, 179 207 1 177 232
Washington, 165 113 1 138 135
COUNTY OF LINCOLN.
Aina, 88 50 3 113 63
Boothbay, 124 115 46 175 150
Bremen, 47 38 - 67 53
Bristol, 201 194 4 184 175
Damariscotta, 155 76 7 151 109 I
Dresden, 103 65 2 138 107 !
Edgecomb, 89 50 2 92 59 J
Jefferson, 21 i 150 12 5u t i56
Newcastle, 150 73 22 228 07
Nobleborough, 97 142 16 143 151
Somerville, 41 48 - 33 61
South port, 26 5 2 10 5
Waldoborougb, 162 426 41 180 610
Westport, 19 13 1 42 25
Whitefiel J, 168 137 - 198 156
Wiscas.-et, 129 179 28 176 231
Mouhegan Isle, 19 18 1 8 9
COUNTY OF OXFORD.
Albany, 75 67 - 74 56
Andover, 94 46 - 93 63
Bethel, 234 110 14 226 223
Brownfield, 107 140 - lb9 182 ■
Uuckfield, 127 148 62 116 152 '
Byron, 26 25 - 24 29 1
Canton, 113 122 6 127 125;
Denmark, 74 117 7 115 122
Dixfield, 88 151 — 87 160
Fryeburg, 155 108 - 148 136
Gilead, 41 25 - 35 17
Grafton, 6 11 - 8 11 :
Greenwood, 90 65 58 115 \
Hanover, 31 33 - 21 32
Hartford, 114 94 18 140 88
Hebron, 100 36 15 96 42
Hiram, 170 128 2 148 125
Lovell, 137 104 - 125 112
Mason, 32 14 — 17 13
Newry, 30 48 - 32 47
Norway, 226 147 17 239 158 ,
Oxford, 124 115 27 13C 136 j
Paris, 307 159 23 347 254 '
Peru, 104 89 2 110 97 j
Porter, 162 90 - 130 101
Roxbury, 13 13 - 12 13
Kuiuford, 169 81 5 16G 124
Stow, 51 48 — 48 44
Stoneham, 47 29 - €4 30
Sumner, 91 69 26 137 83
Sweden, 70 38 — 82 56
Upton, 18 14 - 19 11
Waterford, 161 106 3 112 172
Woodstock, 141 28 5 142 65
Franklin plan, 7 31 — 4 34
llauiliu** tyrant, 6 14
Lincoln plan., 1 4 - 2 5
M ilton plantation, 25 28 - 13 36
COUNTY OF PENOBSCOT.
Alton. 18 ‘ 42 18 91 43
*rgyle, 23 27 14 30 35
Bangor, 1329 880 93 1074 1075
Bradford, HO 89 4‘i 102 79
Brewer, 300 57 17 251 100
Burlington, 2'i 45 - 3l 45
Carmel, 83 154 34 128 153
Carroll, 29 52 3 34 73
Charleston, 119 154 - 104 148
Chester, 35 3 - 45 12
Comma, 181 99 15 102 84
Corinth. 188 110 9 208 124
Dexter, 191 117 102 278 130
Dixmont, 156 43 27 152 50
E Jdiugton, 35 54 23 58 .4
Edinburg, 6 6 - 6 4
K n field, 42 35 13 40 40
Etna, 95 45 20 108 32
Exeter, 107 153 - 137 120
<•41 land, 150 103 10 149 121
Gleuburn, 59 53 3 53 <3
Greenbush, 37 53 - 30 58
Greenfield, 19 9 9 26 20
Hampden 239 170 36 291 233
Hermon, 151 93 7 142 81
Holden, 84 26 6 <0 53
Howland, 29 8 - 22 11
Hudson, 31 90 3 38 101
Kenduskeag, 89 47 17 96 50
Lagrange, 92 20 — 82 4
Lee, 57 103 16 71 114
Levant, 113 90 6 122 98
Lincoln, 157 54 - 179 87
Lowell, 31 47 5 26 58 j
Mattawamkeag, 6 16 - 13 32
Max field, 24 - - 25 -
Milford, 58 16 14 58 33 j
Mt. Chase, 1°
Newburg, 104 21 1 71 48
Newport, 199 76 25 212 73 :
Oidtown, 226 109 35 2T6 2.4
Orotio, 248 161 9 243 148
Orrington, 175 31 2 153 40
rfS^adumkeag, 18 25 2 24 31
Patten, 57 44 1 61 60
Plymouth, 97 89 17 98 93
Prentiss, 25 8 - 43 13
Springfield, 87 39 14 126 ^
Stetson, 129 59 63 72
Veaiie, 61 82 10 61 113
Winn, 57 12 - 51 19
Drew plantation, 6 -
Medway plantation, * 20 28
Pattagumpus plan, 8 4 - 7 4
Webster, 16 -
Woodvtlle, 7 7 14 16 ,
Independence, 8 - - 13 -
Lakeville, 6 14 - 5 14
1869. 1870.
Towns.
COUNTY OF PISCATAQUIS.
Abbot, 94 36 13 73 40
Atkinson, 96 58 1 74 70
Barnard, 1 23 1 2 19
Blanchard, 21 7 1 28 8
Bmwnville, 98 26 2 87 32
Dover, 252 97 4 244 141
Foxcroft, 159 36 12 114 52
Guilford, 90 112 1 95 115
Greenville, 19 33 5 20 32
Kingsbury, 17 20 11 18
Mediord, 46 13
Monson, 100 18 10 112 16
Milo, 67 50 29 93 54
Orneville, 28 32 1 30 42
Parkman, 74 134 11 89 131
Sangerville, 91 110 1 84 117
Sebec, 100 51 1 84 56
Shirley, 18 25 1 1 1 25
Wellington, 3 2 71 - 38 71
Williamsburg, 18 4 2 17 3
COUNTY OF SOMERSET.
Anson, 190 213 1 190 208
Athens, 177 127 170 83
Bingham, 63 65 1 70 74
Brighton, 30 <3 - 22 60
Cambridge, 33 61 7 33 63
Canaan, 119 151 5 125 137
Concord, 30 48 2 19 60
Cornville, 129 54 91 29
Detroit, CO 73 C 65 80
Kmbden, 79 90 - 72 89
Fairfield. 252 129 54 247 136
Harmony, 118 61 2 121 66
liurtland, 119 103 - 105 91
Lexington, 29 58 - 25 54
Madison, 171 125 8 172 128
Mayfield, 5 15 - 3 11
Mercer, 116 45 8 107 55
Moscow, . 38 46 3 38 50
New Portland, 159 174 5 176 186
Norridgewock, 243 70 10 220 76
Palmyra, 182 91 6 177 95
Pittsfield, 213 144 8 185 156
Ripley, 35 49 - 32 48
St Albans, 227 59 172 52
Solon, 120 122 12 140 117
>k«»whegan, 495 115 11 491 106
Smitbfield, 85 52 6 71 61
Starks, 89 107 16 92 96
Dead Kiver plan, 11 7 - 12 5
Moose River plan., 12 4 - 8 2
We.«t F**rks plan, 5 5 4 5
The F..rks, 5 13 6 16
C.rratunk, 21 20 - 10 16
Pleasant Ridge, 7 20
No. 2, Range 2, 11 20 8 23
COUNTY OF SAGADAHOC. .
Arrowsie, 19 2o 1 19 75
Ii.th, 509 248 49 513 305
Bowdoinhatn, 210 47 2G 203 45
Bowdoin, 113 01 - 87 52
Georgetown, 00 87 1 45 00
Perkins, 12 1 13 1
Phipaturg, 74 91 l 70 93
Richmond, 183 123 32 179 153
Topshum, 138 00 1 141 8!
West Bath, 45 1 4 - 37 15
Woolwich, 91 48 2 92 5U
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON.
Addison, 50 GO 4 57 81
Alexander, 30 44 - 32 41
Bailey ville, 15 28 - 10 28
Baring, 20 22 29 20
Bediiogton, 1> 3
Calais, 303 11 2 5 434 170
Centeiville, 4 27 4 30
Charlotte. 30 29
Ch. rry field, 107 • 50 2 227 72
Coumbia, 55 00 11 58 01
Columbia Falls, 53 58 4 45 71
Cooper, 18 35
Crawford, 13 19 - 14 10
Cutler, 23 96 - 36 109
I)a nforth, 8 11 - 21 27
Debloia, 12 16 - 10 15
Dennysville, 80 S 80 11
East Alachias, 184 151 - 185 1S9
East port, 295 120 li 274 100
Edmunds, 30 1C 1 41 14
Harrington, CO 74 C 00 G7
Jonesborough, 23 48 1 32 4 5
J«»nesport, 13 59 - 2G 79
Lubec, 121 106 7 123 118
Mae bias, 206 137 18 291 172
Machiasport, 39 56 2 31 95
Marion, 15 12 G 14 22
Marshfield, 36 17 - 31 19
Meddybemps, 16 29 - 1C 25
Milbndge, 46 94 - 30 143
Northfiold, 12 33 - 14 30
Pembroke, 204 126 16 104 103
Perry, 65 31 - 73 51
Princeton, 91 84 1 100 76
Robbinston, 75 02 - 58 52
Steuben. 89 47 2 102 47
Topsfield, 37 49
Trescott, 19 40 - 14 51
Wesley, 33 27 - 27 30
Whiting, 17 24 5 18 40
Whitney vifle, 48 47 1 62 48
Cody ville plan, 3 11
Jackson Brook pi., 5 6 - 13 10
Talmadge plan, 3 9 - 3 10
Waite plantation, 5 20 5 18
No. 14, 10 19
No. 18, 9 13
No. 21, 3 18 5 22
COUNTY OF WALDO.
Belfast, 402 349 05 400 325
Belmont, 36 62 3 37 72
Brooks, 105 45 32 100 57
Burnham, 53 89 2 92 61
Frankfort, 43 135 6 42 146
Freedom, 44 127 9 45 112
Islesborougb, 5G 04 - 50 4H
J.cksou, 58 49 19 h7 42
Knox, 90 85 7 82 81
Liberty, 121 75 4 83 08
Lincoln ville, 132 173 25 194 169
Monroe, 194 57 9 204 03
Moulville, 179 87 7 181 100
Morrill, 55 38 3 04 t3
Northpurt, 69 48 8 56 4*
Palermo, 115 90 9 75 04
Prospect, 50 88 8 4 4 8*»
S.aismont, 122 121 11 123 129
bearrport, 2IG 126 12 194 112
Stockton, 53 192 121 IbG 185
Swan ville, 85 59 7 03 48
Tborudike, 115 49 7 106 49
Troy, 127 142 3 84 1 27
Unity, 137 112 4 131 105
Waldo, 55 35 5 59 43
Winterport, 298 107 24 232 158
COUNTY OF YORK.
Arton, 154 109 - 155 105
Allred, 152 98 4 147 134
Berwick, 220 187 8 229 196
Bidd.ford, 500 066 41 028 826
Buxton, 299 3o8 12 314 3'2»
Cornish, 149 74 1 147 94
Dayton, «3 77 1 75 86
Elliot, 218 192 — 216 197
Hollis, 200 20 4 2 194 172
Kennebunk, 185 142 53 2)7 102
K emu; bank port, 176 219 4 214 258
lvittery, 416 lOl 3 446 161
Lebanon, 227 87 - 205 76
Limerick, 157 136 7 104 lGf
Liiuington, 197 204 1 175 191
Lyman, 128 102 4 147 111
New field, 137 125 3 151 123
North Berwick, 215 195 7 178 1«*2
Parsomfiald, 177 204 - 171 216
Saco, 483 247 3G 062 361
Shapleigb, 122 152 2 140 134
South Berwick, 213 227 17 202 247
Sanford, 179 189 20 187 185
Waterborough, 206 105 14 240 168
Wells, 230 296 23 217 280
York. 235 164 3 256 213
Recapitulation.
1869. 1870.
a
r ■ a i
Counties. j=. a £
H t: ja j X
« 1 .X 5 a
o 03 a a. os
Androscoggin, 2613 1734 531 2743 2399
Aroostook, 1170 737 02 1601 1023
Cuiube* land, 6050 4452 481 6005 5720
Franklin, 1003 1473 134 1972 1651
llnnoock, 2502 1774 203 2688 2320
Kenuebec, 4005 3107 760 5305 3401
Kuox, 2103 2528 145 2348 2555
Lincoln, 1810 1765 186 2169 2217
Oxford, 3610 2738 233 3628 3283
Pen.baeit, 6213 4023 686 6218 5431
Piscataquis, 1378 043 96 1358 1055
Somerset, 3677 2501 172 3486 2554
Sagadahoc, 1460 805 113 1405 040
Washington, 2609 2131 105 3014 2716
Waldo, 3100 2604 430 3014 2552
York, 5638 4870 267 6117 5350
50920 38295 4643 54051 43176
EDWARD
/j»
1^?4 Water Street,
DEALER IN
FINE J E W ELR Y,
-and
Gorham’s Hterling {Silver* Ware.
AGENTS FOU TIIE
WA&YEASt ■ WAT-GH GeMPAKY,
And Lazarus & Morris’ Perfected Spectacles.
Special attention paid to the Repairing of all kinds of Fine Watches. Chronometer
Balances Applied and Accurately Adjusted to Temperature and Position.
Time Taken by Transit.
BOS W O B, T BE
4
IS OFFERING
G-reat Inducements
«
TO BUYERS OF
WOOLLEN GOODS,
Heady Made Clothing,
SHIRTS, DRAWERS,
AND EVERY DESCRIPTION OK
Furnisliing: Goods.
My Stoclt is tiro IjiYTIGEST ever offered
In tills City !
Large Sales and Small Profits !
Those wishing Garments MADE TO ORDER will find it for their interest to call.
Cutting Done at Shcrt Notice.
. K. T. BOS WORTH.
lT'-A Water Street, Augusta.
teptlT-ftf
Oculist and Aurist,
Formerly a resident of this city, (from I860
till 1862, and again from 1866 to 1868,)
Whose success in the treatment of all
diseases of the
Throat anti Lungs!
Is too well known in this vicinity
to require more than this
Announcement,
Can be consulted ut the
MANSION HOUSE*
AUGUSTA,
Thursday, Friday & Saturday,
September 29th and 30th,
AND
October 1st.
DEAFNESS,
Discharges from the Ear,
Blindness,
And the various diseases of the
EYE.
Catarrli
In Its various lorins.
»eptt7-tawAwlw_
Wanted Immediately !
rp WO FIRST CLASS Female Compositors.
I Highest prices ami permnncnl work guaranteed.
Apply immediately' to E. C. ALLEN & C0.4
Publishers of The Peoples’ Literary Companion.
Mfpl‘2
New Goods!
New Goods!
[We arc now opening our stock of
SUM >1 E II
Dress Goods
g Comprising all the
NOVELTIES of the SEASON!
We call special attention to our stock of
BLACK SILKS!
For Ladies’ Suits and Out
side Garments.
Also to our
JAPANESE MLIiS.
In Plain, Plaids, and stripes
N. B. -Always on hand,
Androscoggin Remnants
OF BROWN COTTONS.
Burton & Russell.
June 13, 1870. Ttl
AUCTION.
Great Trade Sale !
75 NEW CARRIAGES
AT AUCTION,
September ‘24tb, at Portland, Me.
The undersigned will commence n series of
Full Trade Wales,
nn<l offer 7«1 new carriage* at auction at their
t-pucious ware-rooms iu i’ortland, on Saturday,
Sept. 24. at 10 o’clock A. M.
These carriages embrace every stylo and
kind made or ummI in this Male, varying in price
from tKl to 900 dollars. Many oi them our ow n
make, of the most choice and desirable styles.
Wo design to make those sales permanent, ami
every carriage offered, will be sold w ithout reserve.
Catalogues with lull descriptions will be ready
Sept. 22.
C. P. KIMBALfc & LARKIN.
Picture Frames!
CHROMOS, BRACKETS, ALBUMS!
&c., iVc., &e.,
In Large Variety.
Picture Framos of any size made to order at short
notice at
Headers Photograph Rooms,
Opposite Post Office, Augusta.
tjune2-tf
Homccpathic.
R. R. WILLIAMS, M. D.
Office :u Water street, (up stairs)
UAllI>orEH, ME.
Offlo. Hour, from 1 to 4 P. M. *ep9-ttf