Search America's historic newspaper pages from 1770-1963 or use the U.S. Newspaper Directory to find information about American newspapers published between 1690-present. Chronicling America is sponsored jointly by the National Endowment for the Humanities external link and the Library of Congress. Learn more
Image provided by: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library, Urbana, IL
Newspaper Page Text
ii owned and published WEEKLY by The Illinois Progressive Publishing Co., Inc., 187 N. LaSalle St., Chicago 1, 111. Phone: RAndolph 6-9270 METZ P. LOCHARD.Editor ROD HOLMGREN.. ■ .Managing Editor JOSEPH PERSILY.Business Manager SUBSCRIPTION RATES 1 year.$2.00 (Add $1 for Canada ana Foreign) Entered as second class matter October 5, 1948, at the post office at Chicago, Illinois, under the Act of March 3, 1879. Editorials Watch Liberia, too The headlines featuring Berlin, China, Greece and Palestine have taken our eyes off Africa. For American big business and military interests, the front door to that continent is Liberia. If economic and political independence are inseparable parts of one whole, then the 100th anniversary of independence which the Negro West African Republic celebrated last year was some what premature, to say the least. Foreign bankers, J. P. Morgan among them, held a heavy mortgage on Liberia from 1871 down to 1926, when the Firestone corporation took over and converted the country into an Ameri can rubber colony. Firestone’s lease, covering one million acres of land at a rental of 6 cents an acre, runs until the year 2025. But Firestone’s sun over Liberia started into eclipse last year when the Liberia Company, organized and headed by Edward R. Stettinius, Jr., was established. Besides being a former U.S. Secretary of State, Stettinius has also been a director of such corporations as U.S. Steel, General Motors, General Electric, and the Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. With the exception of rubber and iron ore, the Liberia Company's rights cover all the resources of the country. For a period of 80 years, according to the terms of the agree ment, the Liberian government is called upon to “contribute every government facility and the necessary safeguards and privileges lawful and appropriate to the execution of this agreement.” A pretty big order. Might not the “safeguards” expected include such things as strike-breaking? If a dispute should arise between the company and Liberia over this or some matter and it is impossible for arbitrators appointed by both sides to settle things or decide on a third arbitrator, the agreement provides that this third and final arbi trator shall be appointed by—can you guess?—the president of Columbia University. Africa will not always remain a pawn on the American and European chess board. She will not for long continue to tolerate inordinate exploitation of her land, natural resources and the native population. She will rise some day against this oppressive imperialism. Already there are stirrings that point to a not too distant struggle for autonomy and complete liberation. More on the comic books To the Editor: . I was glad to see your article discussing the pros and cons of comic books for children. This article refers to me as a teacher *‘of Pine Grove Pre-School.” In this school my connection has been that of a parent. I would also like to correct the impres sion conveyed by the comment attributed to me that ‘‘many comic books are valuable in helping to answer the questions of youngsters in imaginative ways.” My view of comic books is that of the Congress of Ameri can Women, which character izes them as “in intent and ef fect-demoralizing.” The few exceptions cited are helpful as suggestions for parents. How ever, in practice, selection is rarely left to parents and chil dren cannot begin to discrimi nate until decent comics are available in proportion to the 60,000,000 total poured out every year. Individual action is not enough. What is needed is or ganized pressure by parents and educators, not on the children, but on the irresponsible, dime hungry publishers. Katherine Fromer * _ •. c- . "j. v*-» Looking at by Rod Holmgren SPEEP-UP complaints com ing from more and more unions in and around Chicago. Latest concerns 18 men discharged at the Armour hog offal depart ment for failure to keep pace with stepped-up work load. Local 347 of United Packing house Workers (CIO) told Arm our bosses “you can’t do that” and the men were reinstated, pronto. Make no mistake about it, speed-up will be a key issue in fourth-round wage negotiations. Worker., are being driven to pro duce more in less time. Output per worker today is about 35 percent higher than before the war. Seventy-five workers now turn out as much goods as 100 workers did in 1939. Three ways to fight speed-up: 1) insist on Taft-Hartley Act re peal and restoration of union right to defend the working con ditions of members; 2) block any attempted introduction of speed-up methods behind phony excuse of hiking efficiency and output. As CIO rubber workers suggest: “A void any possible hint of agreement with reduc tion of pay per unit—which is what speed-up amounts to.” 3) guard against trick clauses in contracts calling for “coopera tion” in increasing production and efficiency. This kind of thing can be opening wedge for speed-up-drive. ☆ ☆ ☆ GRANT OAKES, Farm Equip ment Workers president, is quoting history in reply to ques tions about the election out come. Passage goes like this: “In 1840 a southern abolition ist named James Bimey ran for President and got only 7,000 votes. Eight years later, former President Martin Van Buren ran for President on an anti-slavery platform and won little more than 200,000 votes. But by 1860, Abraham Lincoln was swept into the White House on sub stantially the same program.” ☆ ☆ ☆ DATE for the trial of Robert M. Medill and Robert Weir on charges of “palapable omission of duty” in the Centralia mine disaster will be set by Circuit Judge Randolph in Fairfield Dec. 21. If the trial begins—as predicted—in February, it will be two years after the explo sion which' cost 111 miners’ lives. The U.S. Supreme Court moved a lot faster than that when it fined the miners’ union for striking two years ago. Who owns the courts? ☆ ☆ ☆ I’m fascinated by National CIO announcement that one Portland speech will be printed in pamphlet form—that of Jus tice William O. Douglas. Read it carefully when it comes out. Douglas’ outline of what he calls “Human Welfare State” is in reality a blue-print for social democracy, or sell-out of work ers to bosses by collaborationist labor leaders. Phil Murray’s hero baldly says U.S. labor lead ers can sell the Marshall Plan far more successfully than “the conventional diplomat.” “Doors tightly closed to all others may open at its (U.S. labor’s) knock,” says Douglas. “Words from American labor promise to find quick accept ance.” You don’t have to ask what kind of words from which labor leaders Justice Douglas has in mind. And now,'The Pumpkin Caper' . . . by Bernie Asbel I HAVE just crept out from a deluge of clippings all about a congressman, a “confessed” spy, a plane from Panama—or was it Honolulu?—a roll of mi crofilm about the size of lip stick, 12 Com munists accused of a plot to rid Americans of the United States, and a pumpkin. There are more char acters, but they only tend to confuse me. Now, I am not one to shy away from an honest dollar. And I see in these clippings the subtle but beckoning opportuni ty to turn a quick buck writing for a ten-cent magazine. There is a potential thriller here. Trouble is, I don’t understand the story. In fact, I seldom do i: the ten-cent magazines. My wife can tell me who the killer is before she’s half-way through and I’m never sure who it was after I’ve finished. Anyhow, if you will stop me when I’m wrong, maybe we can figure this out. Now there’s a Whittaker Chambers who says he used to be a spy. He told that to Rep. J. Parnell Thomas. As a result Chambers is under indictment . . . oh, no, Thomas is under indictment. Oh dear, neither of them ... or rather, Thomas is under indictment because they said he kept government money that should have gone to Cham bers . . . oh, no, to his office help. Chambers is not under indict ment for anything. Chambers, as a confessed spy and intriguer, is Thomas’ star witness against Alger Hiss. Now there’s the cul prit. . . . But, wait, Hiss hasn’t con fessed to anything. And Thomas hasn’t accused him yet of any thing . . . oh, I get it now. Chambers has accused Hiss. He has accused Hiss of collaborat ing with the Russians while he was right at Roosevelt’s elbow, and caused us to lose the war. That’s him. Oh, that must be wrong. Roosevelt was collaborating with th" Russians. We all were . . . and we won the war. Maybe this is right: Hiss has sued Chambers for $75,000 libel and Chambers can’t afford it on his $30,000 salary. No. Well, it seems someone got some papers from the State De partment that caused us to lose the war . . . no, win the war . . . and hid them in a pumpkin. No, hid them in a Chamber-pot. No, gave them to Chambers. That’s right. Chambers kept them for ten years, and then hid them in a pumpkin. So Rep. Thomas—no, Mundt, sent an airplane to get Rep. Nixon from Guadeloupe. And as the airplane drops from the skies . . . gosh, Thomas drops out of the clippings. Wonder why. Oh, there’s the clue. Thomas is under indictment so he wants to lay low. But to show he loved his country all the time, he wants to indict Chambers. No, he wants Chambers to indict Hiss. Now, the Department of Justice has indicted 12 Com munists, and they also indicted Thomas. Tom Clark doesn’t want Thomas’ pumpkin in Chambers’ trial. Or rather, he doesn’t want Chamber’s pumpkin in the Commuists’ trial because it would look silly. So he’s putting the pumpkin on trial. No he’s sending the grand jury that in dicted the Communists to in vestigate the pumpkin. Right. And everybody admits every thing except Hiss and the Com munists. That’s why they were indicted. Chambers admits be ing a spy. Thomas admits that he took. . . . Oh, no, Thomas doesn’t ad mit it. He says it’s too late to indict him for taking govern ment money because the law says he can’t be punished more than three years after it hap pened. . . . Then how can they pun ish the Communists if they took the papers ten years ago? Not the Communists, I mean Hiss, I mean . . . oh, wait a minute, they don’t know who swiped the papers for Chambers. Oh, I can’t figure this out. I’ll ask my wife. She can al ways murder a ten-cent editor before he’s half-way ... I mean. . . . Jackson and wife, Eleanor, off for Los Angeles. New pickings there, but will still shoot stuff to Defender. Rousing send off party for Jay and w. last Sunday night. Standard’s A1 Vaughn has been informed he had a good time. By Peter Williams ESTHER GRUNSFELD, YPAer, sidled into new Hasty Tasty ice cream swankorium other night at Clark and North. Hailed the night counter man, pointed to spot on the menu reading: “America’s Second Best Chocolate Soda 25 cents.” “I guess everyone asks,” says Esther sav antly, “but where do you get the first best?” “Oh,” comes back the night man, “right over at the comer drug store across the street.” CHICAGO Defender cartoonist Jay DuBOIS Theater Guild hunting for a stage to display its revamp of “Waiting for Lefty” and smart production of “Lonesome Train,” the Robinson-Lampell cantata. Wendell Phillips auditorium running strong. —o— STORM CENTER Gerhart Eisler in Chi cago Dec. 12, Sunday. Speaks on “What Fu ture for Germany?” at Ashland Auditorium 7 P.M. Sponsor Modern Bookstore. Q: Why do radio announcers have such small hands? A: Wee paws for station identification.