Newspaper Page Text
VOLUME XVII. THE SHASTA COURIER. PUBLISHED EVERY SATURDAY M0R5150, BY JOHN J. CONMY. Publication office,— Armory Hall Building, First Floor. Terms of Subscription. For One Year, if paid in advance «••••s*> 00. “ 41 if not paid in advance 8 00. For Six Months, in advance 3 00. 11 “ il not paid iu advance,........ 4 00. These terms wili be invariably adhered to, with out reference to persons or circumstances. Terms of Advertising: For One Square, of 10 lines or less, one insertion, Fete Dollars; for each subsequent insertion. Two Dollars. A liberal discount made to Monthly and Yearly Advertisers. Z-tT Advertisements not marked with the num ber of insertions thereon, will he continued until erdered out, and charged accordingly. ALSO, Having furnished our Office with an elegant as sortment of FANCY JOB TYPES, we are prepared Ko execute, neatly and expeditiously, all manner ot Job Printing such as Bills of Fare, Bill Heads, Circulars, Handbills, Pamphlets, Programmes, Hall Tickets, Cards, Posters, Books, Law Blanks, Catalogues, Drafts, Checks, <lc. JAMES E. PEiiHAM, M. D., Physician, Surgeon and Accouche OFFICE—Main street, next doer to Lewin A Co. SAMUEL RICHARDS, BLACKSMITH WAGON MAKER, Sliasta. I Am now prepared to execute all work in uiy line. In the very best manner, and at VERY LOW P RICCS. Wagons, Carriages and Buggies MADE TO ORDER, An<l n ne but the best Lumber used. On hand, and for sale, of my own manufacture, FREIGHT WAGONS, Concord Wagons and Buggies, of superior style and finish. Particular attention paid to Horse Shoeing and Repairing. PROMPTNESS AND LOW PRICES IS MY MOTTO. fcif* Shop East side of Main street, opposite Wells, Fargo A Co .*.« Express Office. Shasta, July 1567. jII3 RANTZAU & SHAW, FORWARDING AND COMMISSION MERCHANTS. RED BLUFF, CAL MARK. VOLK (1001)3 Care of R. & S., RED BLUFF. Send Shipping Receipts and Bills of Lading. OIK FI UE-PROOF COBBLE STONE Warehouse affords extra inducements to ship pere who store their goods. Assuring our patrons that no pains will be spared in looking to their interests, we ask tor a continuance of their favors. RANTZAU A SHAW. Red Bluff, March 28, 1867. a 6 ISRAEL COMSTOCK. JOHN MARTIN. COMSTOCK & MARTIN, (icccesmiis to riEnc*. chuhch a c 0.,) FORWARDING AND COMMISSION MERCHANTS. Fin-proof Brick Warehoute, formerly occu pied £y Pie res, ChurcA Co., Oak street, near Steamboat Lauding. ISRAEL COMSTOCK will attend to the Foi warding and Commission business in persoi We hope to receive a continuation of the palronae heretofore extended to the old firm. Red Bluff, Nov. 14, 1863. n2l:tf. A. F. COLLINS, Late with nODCE BEOS. A CO. N. C. LUHR Late with DODGE BROS, k C OEO. H. WHEATON. COLLINS. WHEATON A LUHRS Commission Merchants and wholesale dealers in BUTTER, CHEESE, LARD Hams, Haeou, &:c *l9 Front Street, SAN FRANCISCO. Liberal Advances made on ail Coentry p, duoo. ' , (Llic Courier, DANIEL LYNCH &o □ IDEALER, Fire-Proof Brick Building, Callaghan’s Block, Shasta, RESPECTFULLY informs the citizens of Shasta, and the Traders, Teamsters and Packers of the North ern counties, that he has always on hand and for sale an extensive stock ol GENERAL MERCHANDISE* GROCERIES And PROVISIONS, AT WHOLESALE AND RETAIL, Which ho is determined to sell so low as to Defy Competition. DANIEL LYNCH. Shasta, May 2S, ISG4. m2S STOP THAT THIEF OF A <C ough !! IT IS STEALING FROM YOU YOUR Health, which is dearer to you than all your Wealth. Nine-tcntus of the diseases prevalent in this climate spring from Colds and Coughs. Henley’s Royal Balsam j j Challenges the world to produce anythin" in the shape of Medicines that will remove and eradicate a Cough or soreness in the Chest, us prompt, no matter what form the disease might assume. ‘Hen ley’s Royal Balsam” is the best Medicine in tin world for Bronchial or Pulmonory affections. For Croup or Hooping Cough, there is nothing on earth that can e<|iial it. All motherors and Nurses ought to have a bottle close by them, it will give n child relief in two minutes. It is entirely veg etable. and will prove a blessing to the human family. For the Benefit cf Suffering Human ity. From Mr. Thomas.—We have used Henley’s Royal Balsam in my family this winter. There is no use :alking. It throws everything in the shape of Cough medicine in the shade that I ever saw. My wife was troubled with asthma or smothering spells fur years, and could get nothing to have any effect until 1 struck this “Royal Balsam” She is now about, well. It cured me of the worst cold I ever had in my life in one night. Whenever our children have anything like a cough, a few drops given on going to bed—that is the last of the cough. 1 never intend to he without it in the house. B. THOMAS, the paper man. From Judge Marquam. I have used “Henley’s Royal Balsam,” myself and family, and find it a first-rate medicine for Coughs aud Colds. 1 hereby recommend it to the public. P. A. MARQUAM. From Mr. Pittock. We have used some of “Henley’s Royal Balsam” in my family and think it is a splendid medicine for children, as well as f<»r grown persons. For Coughs and Colds I freely recommend it to the public. ‘ K. PITTOCK. From F. Dewitt. Merchant. To the Pm Lie. — I had a bad cough for a long time. A friend urged me tog*t a bottle of “Hen ley’s Royal Balsam.” He said it cured him. I got a bottle, and sure enough it had a splendid ef fect. It dried the cough up in a short time, I hereby recommend it to the public. F. DeWITT. L. GROSS, Sole Proprietor, Portland, Oregon. For sale by L. Wellondorff, Shasta. [39. FLEMING’S SAW MILL, Beaiuly Creek. HS m ‘A JOHN FLEMING, . . Proprietor. This mill is in successful opera tioo on Brandy Creek, about two miles from Wbiskytown, and J. H. Gilbert will keep constant ly on hand and for sale a supply of Lumber, at his Brick Warehouse, on Main street. Shasta, where he will attend to all orders and the sale of Lumber for the above Mill. J. H. GILBERT, Agent, Shasta. March 4. 1868 m 7 1 IVotiee. \J. I.OOMIS. OF WEAVER VIT.L.E, • Trinity County, has this day purebr-ed an interest in the Forwarding Business of Pantzau A Shaw. Red Bluff. Thanking our patrons far the ; . past liberal favors, we trust, by close attentiea and fidelity to business entrusted to our care. ,o merit a contipu ance of the same. The firm name of R&ntzsa k Shaw will be con tinued for the present. Mark Goods as care of R. k S., Red Bluff. RAXTZAU k SHAW. Red Bluff. Feb. Bth. 1868. f!5 Ayer’s Cherry Pectoral. SHASTA, CAL.. SATURDAY, MARCH 28. IS6S. L. P. I ISHEH—Ih the only Agent of the Shasta Courier in San Francisco, with pow ers to receive subscriptions and advertisements, and receipt fur the same. OFFICE—Ifi9 Washington street, opposite Ma guire’s Opera House. SHASTA COURIER. Webster on the Power of Removal. The following is an extract from a speech delivered by Daniel Webster in the Senate of the United States on the 10th of February, 1835—Webster’s Works, vol. IV., pp 189, on the power of removal from office by the President—which has a singular applicabil ity to the great controversy now in progress at Washington. Mr. Webster said : The Constitution nowhere says one word of the power of removal Irora office, except in the case of conviction on impeachment.— Wherever the power exists, therefore, except in cases of impeachment, it must exist ns a constructive or incidental power. If it exist in the President alone, it must exist in him because it is attached to something else, or result from something else, which is grant ed to the President. There is certainly no specific grant ; it is a power therefore, the existence of which, if proved at all, is to be proved by inference and argument. In the only instance in which the Constitution speaks of removal from office, ns I have already said, it speaks of it as the exercise of judicial power ; that is to say. it speaks of it as one part of the Judgment of the Senate, in cases of conviction on impeachment. No other mention is made, in the whole instrument, of any power of removal. Whence, then, is the power derived to the President? It is usually said, by those who minntaiu its existence in the single hands of the Pres ident, that the power is derived from that clause of the Constitution which says, “ The executive power shall he vested in a Presi dent. ' The power of removal, they argue, is, in its nature, sn executive power: and, as the executive power is thus vested in the President, the power of removal is necessa rily included. It is true, that the Constitution declares that the executive power shall be vested in the President ; bat the first question which then nrises is. What is ex<rui ire powerT — What is the degree, and what are the limita tions f Executive power is not a thing so well known, and so accurately defined, as that the written constitution of a limited government can he supposed to have confer red it in the lump. What is executive power ? What are the boundaries? What model or example had the framers of the Con stitution in their minds, when they spoke of •‘executive power?” Did they mean execu live power as known in England, or as known in France, or as known in Russia? Did they take it as defined by Montesquieu, by llurlamaqui, or by De Loimft ? All these differ from one another as to the extent of the executive power of government. What then was intended by “executive power?” Now, Sir, I th-nk it perfectly plain and man ifest. that, although the framers of the Con stitution meant to confer executive power on the President, yet they meant to define and limit that power, and to confer no more than they did tans define and limit. When they said it shall be vested in a President, thev meant that one magistrate, to be called a President, shall hold the executive authority : hut they mean, further, that he shall hold this authority according to the grants and limitations of the Constitution itself. They did nut intend certainly, a sweeping gift of prerogative. They did not intend to grant to the President, whatever might he construed, or supposed, or imagined to ho executive power; and the proof that the}- meant no such thing is, that, immediately after using these general words, they pro ceed specifically to enumerate his several distinct and particular authorities; to fix and define them; to give the Senate an es sential control over the exercise of some of them, and to leave others uncontrolled. By the executive power conferred on the Brest dent, the Constitution means no more than that portion which itself creates, and which it qualifies, limits, and circumscribes. A general survey of the frame of the Con stitution will satisfy us of this. That instru ment goes all along upon the idea of dividing the powers of government, sn far as praoti cable, into three great departments. It de scribes the powers and duties nf these de partments in an article allotted to each. As first in importance and dignity, it begins with the legislative department. The first article of the Constitution, therefore, com mences with the declaration, that “all leg islative power herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Rep resentatives.” The article goes on to pre scribe the manner in which Congress is to be constituted and organized, and then pro reeds to enumerate, specifically, the powers intended to he granted ; and adds the gen eral clause, centering such authority as may he necessary to carry granted powers into Now, Sir. no man doubts that this is a limited legislature; that it possesses no powers but such as arc granted by express words or necessary implication ; and that it would be quite preposterous to insist that Congress possesses ary particular legislative powers, merely because it is, in its nature a legislative body; .f no grant can be found for it in the Constitution itself. *1 hen, cc.nes. Sir, the second article creating -m executive power ; and it declares’ that “ .he executive power shall be vested in a P esident of the United States.” After prjviding for the mode of choosing him. it immediately proceeds to enumerate, spijpi fically, the powers which he shall possess and exercise, and the duties which he shall p er form. I consider the language of this article therefore, precisely analogous to that in which the legislature is created; that is to say, I understand the Constitution as saying that “ the executive power herein granted shall be vested in a President of the United State*.' 1 , In like manner, the third article, or that which is intended to arrange the judicial system, begins by dvelaring that “the judicial power of the United State* shall bo vested in one Supreme Cou-t, and in such inferior Courts a* the Congress may, from time to time, ordoin and establish.” But these general words do not show what extent of judicial power is vested in the Court* of the United States. All that is left to be dime, aud is done, in the following sections, l>y express and well guarded provisions. I think, therefore, Sir, that very great caution is to be used, and the ground well considered, before wo admit that the Presi dent derives any distinct and specific power from those general words which vest the exe cutive authority in him. The Constitution itself does not rest satisfied with these general words. It immediately goes into particulars, and carefully enumerates the several authori ties which the President shall possess. The very first of the enumerated powers is the Army and Navy. This, most certainly, is an executive power. And why is it particu larly set down and expressed, if any power was intended to be granted under the general words? litis would pass, if anything would pass, under these words. But enumeration, specification, particularization, was evident ly the design of the framers of the Constitu tion, in this us in other parts of it. Ido not. therefore, regard the declaration that the executive power shall he vested in a President as being any grant at all ; any mure than the declaration that the legislative power shall bo vested in Congress constitutes. In the one case as in the other, I think the object was to describe and denominate the department which should hold, respectively, the legislative and executive authority ; very much as we see, in some of the State Consti tutions, that the several articles are headed with the titles “legislative power,” “ exe cutive power,” “judicial power aud this entitling of the articles with the name of the power has never been suppoied, of itself, to confer any authority whatever. It amounts to no more than naming the departments. If, then, the power of reraoval ; be admitted to be an executive power, still it must be sought for and found among the enumerated executive powers, or fairly implied from some one or more of them. It cannot be implied from the general words. The power of ap pointment was not left to he so implied; "by, then, should the power of removal have been so left ? They are both closely connected ; one is indispensable to the other; why, then, was one carefully expressed, de fined, and limited, and not one word said about the other ? Sir, I think the whole matter is sufficiently plain. Nothing is said in the Constitution about the power of removal, because it is not a separate and distinct power. It is part of the power of appointment, naturally going with it or necessarily resulting from it. The Constitution or the laws may separate these (towers, it is true, in a particular case, as is done in respect to the Judges, who, though appointed by the President and Senate, c.att not be removed at the pleasure of either or both. Soastatute, in prescribing the tenure of any other office, may place the officer be yond the reach of the appointing power.— But where no other tenure is prescribed, and officers hold their places at will, that will is necessarily the will of the appointing power ; because the exercise of the power of appoint ment at once displaces such officers. The [tower :.f placing ore man in office necessari ly imp! it t the power of turning another out. If one in in be Secretary of State, and another he appointed, the first goes out by the mere force of the appointment of the other, with out any previous act of removal whatever.— And this is the practice of the Government, and has been from the first. In all the removals which have been made, they have generally been effected simply by making other appointments. I cannot find a case to the contrary. There is no distinct official act of removal. I have looked into the prac tice, and caused inquiries to be made in the departments, and 1 do not learn that any such proceeding is known as an entry or record of the removal of an officer from office; and the President could only act, in such cases, by causing some proper record or entry to he made as proof of the fact of re moval. I am aware that there have been some cases in which notice has been sent to persons in office that their services are, or will be, after a given day, dispensed with.— These are usually cases in which the object is, not to inform the incumbent that he is removed, but to tell him that a successor either is, or by a day named will be appoint ed. If there be any instances in which such notice is given without express reference to the appointment of a successor, they are few; and even in these, such reference must be implied; because in no case is there any dis tinct official act of removal, that I can find, unconnected with the act of appointment.— At any rale, it is the usual practice, and has been from the first, to consider the appoint ment as producing the removal of the pre vious incumbent. When the President de sires to remove a person from office, ho sends a message to the Senate nominating some other person. The message usually runs in this form : “ I Dominate A. B. to he Collec tor of the Customs, etc., in the place of C. D., removed.” If the Senate advise and consent to this nomination, C. D. is effec tually out of office, and A. B. is in, in his place. The same effect would be produced if the message should say nothing of any removal. Suppose A. B. to be Secretary of State, and the President to send us a message, saying merely, “ I nominate C. D. to be Secretary of State.” If we confirm this nomination, C. D. becomes Secretary of State, and A. B. is necessarily removed. I have gone into these details and particu lars, Sir, for the purpose of showing, that, not only in the nature of things, hut also according to the practice of the Government, the power of removal is incident to the power of appointment. It belongs to it, is attach ed to it, forms a part of it. or results from it. If this he true, the inference is manifest. If the power of removal, when not otherwise regulated by Constitution or law, bo part and parcel of the power of appointment, or a necessary incident to it, then whoever holds the power of appointment bolds also the power of removal. But it is the President and the Senate, and not the President alone, who holds the power of appointment; and therefore, according to the true construction of the Constitution, it should be the Presi dent and Senate, and not the President alone, who hold the power of removal. A movement is being made in Paris to re turn to the ancient system of incremation, or burning, for the disposal of the dead. The large cemeteries of Paris taint the air of the iity. and it is feared that even the new bnry ing ground near Pontoise, which will meas ure 2,125 acres, will not be sufficiently re. moved from Paris. Curious History of the “ Veiled Prophet of Khorassau.” Arrninius Vambery’s “ Central Asia,” which has just appeared in London, is a supplement to his work called “ Travels in Central Asia.” This volume gives inter esting accounts of some new adventures of M. I ambery while exploring the East in the disguise of a Dervish, and also con tains a series of chapters on the manners, characteristics and literature of the Cen tral Asiatic races. The pages devoted to the ancient history of Bokhara contains an account of Mokanna, the original of the “ 5 ailed Prophet of Khornssan,” in Moore’s “ Lalla Ilookh.” Mokanna occupied him self, in early youth, with acquiring all kinds of knowledge, including enchant ments and secret arts. At length he gave himself out as a prophet, and proclaimed to his adherents that he had existed earlier in the world as Adam, Ibrahim, Moses, Jesus, and Mohammed, and called upon them to follow him to Paradise. He continually wore a veil to conceal his deformity, as his features were distorted, and he was ono eyed and bald. He obtained many followers, and tho greater part of the villages around Sa marcand and Bokhara went over to his party. After a contest nf many years between Mokanna and the Mohammedans the prophet w'as driven across the Oxus and retreated into a strong fortress on the mountain of Siam, where he finally perished. Mr. Yam bery says : “ Mokanna, the mysterious prophet, _kcpt himself during this period always in the for tress, attended by ono hundred of the love liest women of Transoxania. The interior of the castle was kept only for these with himself and one male page; besides these there was no earthly one permitted to pene trate into his sanctuary. They say that fifty thousand of his followers lay at the gate of tho fortress, and earnestly implored him to show but Once his god like splendor. He refused; sent his page with the message : 1 Say to the servants that Musa (Moses) also wished to see my god head, but tho beams of my splendor be could not support. My glance kills instantly the earth-born.’ The enthusiastic adherents assured him that they would gladly offer their lives as a sacrifice if this high enjoyment was allowed to them.— When he could not further deny them, Mok anna consented to their entreaty, and ap pointed them to come at a certain time before the gate of the fortress, where he would show himself. On the evening of the ap pointed day he ordered that his women should be placed in a line, with look ing-glasses in their hands, as tho beams of the setting sun were reflected in the look ing glasses, and when everything was illu minated by that reflection, he ordered them to open the doors. The splendor blinded the eyes nf his devoted adherents, who fell pros trate and called out: “ God ! enough for us of thy glory ; for if we see it more all will be destroyed 1” They lay long in the dust supplicating him, until at length he sent his page with the message: “God is pleased with you, ami he has given you for your use, the good of all the world.” “Fourteen long years Mokanna who is reported to have lived in this fortre s. consuming his time with women in drinking and carousing.— The Arab Field Marshal, Said Hersi, had at last, after a hard siege, driven him iuto straits. The outer part was taken, and there was only the inaccessible citadel on n higher eminence. With the extinction of his as cendant star, Mokanna was abandoned by his followers, and when ho saw the inevita ble ruin nigh, he decided not to fall into the hands of his enemies, rather to destroy him self with his women and treasure. He gave to the women at a last carouse a strong dose of poison in wine, and challenged them to empty a’gohlct with him. All drank, hut ono, who poured the wine into her bosom, and. as an eye witness, told later the whole catastrophe. According to her, Mokanna, after all the woman had fallen dead, cut oft' the head of his faithful page, and quite na ked, burnt bimself and Ins ticasures in a furnace which had been heated for three days. He announced before that he wished to go to heaven to call the angels to his help. “ I have long watched the furnace,’ said the fortunate woman who escaped, 4 hut he never came hack in that fashion.’ After the death of Mokanna there were many sects and creeds, but they concealed themselves from the ever-increasing power of Islam. Under the Samanidcs the doctrine of Mohammed spread more and more, and Transuxanitin countries became soon famous for their re ligious zeal.” A Genuine Gorilla.—A live gorilla is now on its way from Africa to London Zoolog. icnl Society. It was captured by a native, who suddenly came upon a family group of the animals. The mother, contrary to what might have been expected, abandoned her “ baby,” and ran off; the lather showed fight, rushing at the native open-mouthed, and receiving a stab in the side from the spear, which caused him to retreat a little, when the man, not waiting to receive a second attack, snatched up the young one, and made his retreat home as soon as possible. The gorilla is fed up..n goat’s milk, raw eggs, and berries. A Mr. Walker, the possessor, writes : “ The grief of the little fellow when first caught was quite touching to witness ; he could scarcely bear to be looked at. and, if at all annoyed by the presence of many people round him, would lie on the ground, with his face buried in his hands, and sway his head from side to side, as if in an agony of sorrow at losing bis parents ; and even now, when left alone for any length of time, be has relapses of the same kind, and appears to bo in great tribu lation.” Got the Wrong Pants. —A married man was engaged on night work in Fonddu Lac, and was accustomed to being absent from home every night in the week. A night or two ago he was suddenly taken ill, went home at an unusual hour, and retired with out lighting a lamp. He had not been in bed long when his wife, in the most plaintive - and agonizing tones also complained of hav ing been taken suddenly sick, and pleading ly asked him if he did not feel well enough ; to go down to a drug store and| get her some medicine. Although quite sick himself, the husband readily consented ; got up, donned his garments, and proceeded to the store as requested. White there be discovered that he Pad on another man’s pants, and returned to find his own missing. NUMBER 3. DON’T MARRY A MAN IF HE DRINKS. Young ladies, pray listen to mo, And keep just as quiet as mice, While I sing you a song—it is not very long— Which contains apiece of advice. No matter what people may say. No matter what somebody thinks ; If you want to be happy the rest of your days, Don’t marry a man if he drinks ; Don’t marry a man if he drinks. He may be so handsome and gay, And have such a beautiful voice ; And may dance so divinely, you’ll feel in your heart That he must be the man of your choice ; If his accents are tender and low. And sweeter than roses and pinks. And his breath quite a different thing, you may know Your exquisite gentleman drinks. Your exquisite gentleman drinks. Just think of the sorrows and cares, The heart-rending sighs and fears ; Of the words, and the blows, and cruelest woes. And then think of the ocean of tears ; Think of Toodles, the drunkenest of men, His attitudes, his coughs and winks, And then think what a dignified pair you will make, If you marry a man that drinks, If you marry a man that drinks. Young ladies, look well to your hearts, Don’t throw them away on a sot; Or a man who is given to treating his friends, Whate'er be his station or lot; Though his pride may uphold him awhile, Yet sooner or later ho sinks; Then if you would be happy the rest of your days. Don’t marry a man if he drinks, Don’t marry a man if he drinks. JLassons from au Old Merchant. That veteran and honorable merchant, Johnathan St urges of New York, at the din ner given in his honor on the occasion of his retirement from active business, gave the following golden counsel to young men: “ Now, gentlemen, since there is nothing that I can talk about that you do not under stand a great deal better than I do, I pro pose to say a few words for the benefit of I young men outside, and if you approve of ! what is said, lot it be considered ns said by j the Grand Jury of Merchants assembled. One of the first lesson I received was in 1813, when I was eleven years of age. My grandfather had collected a fine flock of merino sheep, which were carefully cherished during the war of 1812 15. 1 was shepherd boy, and my buisincss was to take care of the sheep in the fields. A boy, more fond of his hooka than of sheep, was sent with me, hut left the work to me, while he lay io the shade and read his hooks. I finally complained of this to the old gentleman. I shall shall never forget the benignant smile as he replied : “Never you mind; If you watch the sheep you will have the sheep." I thought to myself; what does the old gentleman mean? I don't expect to have any sheep. My aspi rations were quite moderate io those days, and a firstrate merino buck was worth SI,OOO. I could not make out exactly what he meant, and went out contentedly with the sheep.— After I got to the field, I could not get the idea out of my head. Finally I thought of my Sunday lesson ; “ Thou hast been faith ful over a few things, I will make over many things.” Then I understood it: Never you mind who neglects his duty, be you faithful, and you will have your reward 1 1 do not think it will take many lads as long as it did mo to understand this proverb. I teeeived my second lesson soon after I came to this city, as a clerk in the late Ly man Reed. A merchant from Ohio, who knew me, came to purchase goods from Mr. Reed, lie expressed his gratification at find ing roe there, and said to me: “ You have got a good place. Make yourself so useful that they cannot do without you.” I took his meaning quicker than I did the proverb about the sheep. Well, I worked upon these two ideas until Mr. Reed offered me an in tcrest in his business. The first morning after the co-partnership was announced, Mr. James Oecry, the old tea merchant, called to see me : “ You are all right now ; 1 have one word of advice to give you ; he careful who you walk the streets with.” That lesson was three. In this connection I must repeat on anec dote told of the late Robert Lennox. A country merchant came into the store of Mr. Morton, a highly respectable Scotch mer chant, *,j purchase goods, lie spoke about credit, references, 4c. Mr. Morton said : I will give you what credit you wish. ‘ But.’ said the merchant, ‘ I am an entire stranger to you.’ Mr. Morton replied : ‘ Did I not see you at church with Robert Lennox?'— “ Y’es, I was at church with him.”— 1 Well, 1 will trust any man whom Robert Lennox will take to church with him.’ I hope these three lessons of watchfulness over the interests of their employers, watch fulness over their partners’ interests and their own, after they are joined, followed by an intense watchfulness that no black sheep creep into their folds, may be impressed by these anecdotes upon the minds of those for whom they are intended. One other lesson I feci it very necessary to inculcate —that of patience. With a little patience most young men will find a position as high as they have fitted themselves to fill. In all the changes which have taken place in my firm since 1822, no partner has been brought into it who bos not served as a clerk in the establishment. And I now leave ray house well organized, prosperous, and free from complications, still in the hands of those who have served in it as clerks for a longer or shorter period. 1 mention this as an en couragement to young men to persevere in the faithful performance of their duties.” A Good Remedv.— The editor of the lowa Fal’s Sentinel has invented a method whereby he keeps his neighbors’ cows from stealing his hay. We would recommend those in this city who are so frequently afflicted with thieving cows to try the remedy. It ia described in this way : A certain quadruped had a sweet tooth for our hay stack, and did much damage, throw, ing down a seven rail fence and roosting in our hay. We bought a box of Cayenne pep per. took a nice lock of hay, placed it outside the fence, “baptized” it with pepper, anl watched. The animal came along and pitched into the hay, when suddenly she took the hint, and with nose at 45 degrees and tail at 90 degrees, her “ sonl went marching on” at the rate of 2:40. That cow has not come back. Try this, ye afflicted, and you will save your hay and have a good buavtu laugh all to yourself.