Newspaper Page Text
ffl a '4 1 ' 1 5 i GO TO THE FOUNTAIN SALOON, FORT STRFEf, K. 1. KII1RV, ....... PROPRIETOR. nnm ' L' l i' noun, ti.OU PER .m M'JL fr.,m v- o clork A. M. to 9 r. M ICR- CCKAH, ICED SODi, a tI(-ER POP, if.. ixl ail thing, that the Lukrl furoi.hrt. i,, u? rflfLK! MILK! MILK ! FROM TUB WELL KNOWN JHJUNUl DAIRY ! rpr3 THE I XDKRSICXEl) IUVINC t"""'""'i "it w-.l known i,ra of Ml I -CI I COWfS from Mr. J. Kichanlmo, anl alio lfd the Lands known a the latTTTIsriJI MILTC RANCH! II- i r'f'P'f'l l" famiih to curtoaiTt PI RK FRESH J1ILK, 1 QlAYnTIES TO SI IT ! AT 3T3t CoutN por QUiVriT, ITLLMKA.-tKK GL'ARANTKED, And Dflirrrril la tbe Hraln and tfterBOou ! J y T.. Ur ruiKwn, och a IMH arl K, -t.urar.t In p '"t" War, Ac, be will luake Special Contrary, at W PRICKS. r.l-r rleo to Jb. who ha rharpe c.f the Milk Van r,r Wl at tt. Internaliruii liotrl, will I .rnmptly at-nIM to AKOMJ. Vn.yru U.r. yl em 1875. 1875. SOr.lETHirJG WEW SAVE YOUR MONEY. rMI E t'XDKRMICXEl) HAS AM) FOB, BALK OX HAM) t E. u EXTRA No. I fa 12 12 Lb. Kills, 2U Lb. Kill- and 2 Lb. Kill. Full weight, thoroughly packed. warranted to keep weet anJ good. PRICES FAR EE LOW ANY XtflNO OF THE KIND IN THE CITT. ALSO IBIS. COLUMBIA RIFER SAUIOJ .! SEASON 1875, No. I, TOO LBS. Each, at Equally LOW PRICES. ALSO, A FEW DA II R ELS C. R. SALMON BACKS ! . X. 1 Extra, Seaaan 1875, Tot JIaaarrJ Paaarfa Enrh nt !I.OO. ' " T " ALSO A Few Bbls. C. R, Salmon! '. 1. 200 Lba. catfe, Srnnaa 1871, al I he Law Price ( 9. t2T Bujers are respectful! requested to call ami emmine for themselves. Tt. tT Ot&rt from the Tnuie, City, aaJ Inlands grnrrally riftfnUy aoitcitej am promptly flllnl. E. C. M'CANDLESS, riSH MARKET, STALLS Ai 3. is si SOMETHING WORTH HAVING ! ! A THING OK BEAUTY. IT IS SAID, IS a joy forever, anU if Ctoesa it the naeniial Mea of beaaly, a we maintain it 14, the fKWINU M ACI11NK with one of tb PATENT WATER WHEEL ATTACHMENTS ! U me of lh most beautiful things in the worhl; nothing Mt the whole range of modern invention being bettor aJaUed to relieve bamao dradgrry or fitter tor the purposes iatemletl. The t'adrraigard are Sprrinl Agrnt mr BELLIES UU1UU1V ! THE DOMESTIC " . IVDICH 13 THE BEST SEWING MACHINE IN USE! SO POINTS Or Sl'PERIORITV 1. For Particulars see Circular. WE ARE PREPARKO TO FURNISH THE PATENT ATTACHMENT: Va Any of the machines now in use, which will run them perfect ly without the leaat exertion on the part of the operator. These Wla are made here at th BRASS FO UN 1R V, are luperior ta tboie tanportcd, and mnd for iesa money. snr oe ixd Yor will be coxvixced i It la a well known fact that the ill health of thousands of wemen and Rirla, can be traced to the exertion required to ran Sewinff Machines by Coot power. A word to the wise is Qflrieut. - - DILLINGHAM Si. CO. . A FEW BASKETS ' OF THE CELEBRATED Piper Hcidsicclt - QUARTS AND TINTS, Juat received per D. C. Murray, and for sale by .ng 3 II. IIACFKELD & CO. SHIP CHANDLERY! ship OPorvERiES. WHALE BOATS, BOAT STOCK, FLOUR AND BREAD, COTTON DUCK, HEMP AND MANILA CORDAGE ! A.c. JLc. Sir, AT LOWEST RATES BY A. W. PEIRCE & CO. Brand's Bomb Lances, Perry Davis Painkiller, Puuloa Salt Works. INVOICE OF AMERICAN CLOCKS ! OR SALE al SAN FRANCISCO PRICES. M 3m 11. UACK.bl U V v. Cedar Boat Boards! . PER CETLON. A FEW THOUSAND FEET pjaned on both .id., and rery wperior qtial.ty. For tale ty (anH) BOIXfcMcu. C. BREWER 6c CO. OFFER FOR SALE -PER BARK CEYLON JUST ARRIVED from BOSTON 1SKS ( I MliKltl.l Nl COAL. NKW I'.Y.bftJHU Oil. Ml'MiK.. I LACK TAINT, IiAUKKI.. KosIN, Iirill:. ANI SIHiKtj?. SWEDISH IRON, REFINED IRON lU.un.l and KI.it. N. B. PILOT BREAD in casks. Parker House ?rlUl,.( Ilunt'a Axes. Iron Hubb Wheelbarrows, Ta o a t li o r X3 oltiug, Uivet, assorted sizes. Rubber Packing, Fence Wire, Nos. 5 & 6 ! Rubber Hose Iow, 11 inrh, Trnss Wire Seives, Cedar Boat Boards, B-t Caustic Smla, Cases Downer's Kerosene Oil, Pine Shooks " ault Columbia River Salmon ! JIST It EC El V K D PER 1:1 KU in barrels and half uarrcls. nul4 .1. A. FALKIX- For s-le bv C. BKKWfcK ft CO. Knowles' Patent Steam Pumps ! C Brewer & Co., SOLE At. KYIS FOR TIIK HAWAIIAN WILL ISLAXDS Receive per Syren from Boston OK THE ABOVE Celebrated Pumps, from No. 2 to G AND ARE READ V TO RECEIVE OR- l ui-.Kfl lor any or the pumps of tins make to be forwarded overianu u necessary, 1IOILER FEED PUMPS. SVRCP PUMPS, DISTILLERV PUMPS, VACUUM PUMPS, Pumps for Hot or Cold Water, Salt Water Pumps. Iricra and other information pivon by aull C. BKKWKK ft CO., Agents. AT THE OLD STAND CORNER OF fort &, iji:i:iv STS. WK AUK f'KKl'AKKU TO OFFKll AT LOW RATES FOR CASH I and on Liberal Terms for Approved Credit. Ha U EE IB 33 EL AND BUILDING MATERIALS! OF ALL DESCRIPTIONS! COMPRISING IUTHLV WEST Timber, Scantling Boards, Battens, Pickets and Laths. REDWOOD Timber, Scantling, Boards, Battens, Pickets, Lattice, Posts, sawed and rough Surfaced Boards and Plank, Rustic Siding, Clapboards, Moulding, &c. Eastern Clear White Pine! 1 in. 1 in. I in. and 2 in. EASTERN DOORS--Raisol, rand, 1 mo. 2 mo. anl Sash. Eastern UDpainteJ BliaJs, Eastern Glazed Sash. CALIFORNIA DOORS-RaiseJ, Tanel, 1 mo. 2 mo. anJ Sash California Tainted BlinJs. Calx GlazcJ Sash. Hubbuck's. Zinc and Lead I Scotch Zinc and Lead. PAINTS AND PAINT OIL! Turpentine and Tutty, Varnish, Taint and White wash Brushes. CrLASS. all Sizes! Locks, Butts. Hinges, Bolts, Window Springs, Hooks and Ejes. WALL PAPER AND BORDERS English, German and American, in great variety, at Low Kates. ALSO Salt at market rates 3 WILDER & CO. l 7 McEWAN S PORTER ! JVST ARRIVED, IN STONE JUGS. (. and iintt. (977 1 For Sale b, CI1A3. LONli. - K ' - t -kmj-ji ' ,ml.mm THE PACiriC (Commercial Slbbcrtisfr. SAT V It DAY. XOVkMHEIt 27. Brighain Young jHust Pay Alimony to Ann Eliza. OriXION Of tlllE JLT1CK MCWEAN. This is an action for divorce, and the j laintilT moves for alimony and sustenance j-endrnie lit''. McKeax Or, J. In her complaint "the y-!ain-tifl' alle", am'ing other thing", that she was torn at Xauvoo, in t!ie State of Illinois ; that b)t- n tw, and liaf l-een continuously since the y.ii l-4, a rtidnt of Suit Iake County, in tiii Tt int ry; that on the fth day of A" Til, ljC, ?!: at d the defendant, llrigham Voung, iiittrui irri 1 ;it that county ; that ever since then the h.ia h.j n, and is now. the wife of the defen- J.iLt: ttiat at tue time ot eaid mrirna?o ehe was in the twenty-tifth year of her ng. and the ! mother of two children, the issue of a farmer ! marriage; that those children vrcre rgl, one i four years and the o her two years ; that neither the nor her children had any estate or patrimony ; whatever, and that they were entirely doj.ndcnt j up.n her f.r their nurture and education; with j all of which f;icts the defendant was well ac- J iuainted, and of which he had been informed prior to the said marriage ; that sai l children, ; hoth of whom are hoys, arc still living, and, from : the time of her marriage to the defendant, have ; hetn continuously, and arc now, under her cus tody, and with no means of support except such j u hhc can provide; that for a period of about j one year alter his marriage, the defendant lived, j and cohabited with, and acted toward the plain- ) till" with some degree of kindness and attention, j and during that time contributed to her mainte nance and the support of her two little children, not, however, in a manner proortionate to his means or to her station in life ; that during all the period mentioned, and ever since then she has discharged with fidelity all the duties and obligations incumbent on her as a married wo man, and uniformly treated the defendant with the utmoet tenderness, ever mindful of her re sponsibilities as a wife ; that about a year after his said marriage, for some cause or motive un known to the plaintiff, the defendant, regardless of all his marital obligations, commenced towards her a systematic course of neglect, unkindness, cruel and inhuman treatment, ending in an abso lute desertion of her, and forcing upon her the conviction that the defendant no longer enter tained for her the slightest feeling of affection or respect, and had altogether withdrawn from her his support and protection. To sustain these allegations, the plaintiff states, in detail, many facts and circumstances, among others, that the defendant has failed and refused to furnish her with necessary food and medical attendance, or the means to obtain them, and prays that by the final decree of this Court the defendant be ordered and decreed to support the plaintiff and her children, and that the bonds of matrimony between the plaintiff and the de fendant be forever dissolved ; and that during the pendency of this action the defendant bo ordered and required to pay alimony to the plaiutiff, for the maintenance and support of herself and chil dren, and sustenance to her solicitors and coun sel, &c. This complaint, which is verified, contains all ncc.fisary averments, and sets forth a complete cause of action under the statute of Utah. Were its allegations all admitted, the plaintiff would be entitled to the relief prayed for as a matter of course. JJut the defendant has interposed an answer, under oath, admitting some and denying some of those allegations. The defendant fir6t qualifiedly denies, and then qualifietlly admits, the marriage of April Gth, 18G3. His denial is as follows : " Now comes the said defendant, llrigham Young, and for answer to the bill of complaint of the said Ann Eliza Young, plaintiff, denies that on the sixth day of April, 18GS, at the County of Salt Lake, Utah Territory, or at any other time or place, this defendant and the said plaintiff intermarried, or that since that time, or at any time, the said plaintiff has been, or that she now is, the wife of this defendant, on in formation and belief, alleges that before that time to-wit ; on the tenth day of April, 18G3, at Salt Lake City, Utah Territory, the said plaintiff' was married to one James L. Dee, who is etill living, and that ever since the said tenth day of April, 18C3, the said plaintiff' has been, and, on the said sixth day of April 18C8, was, and still is, the lawful wife of the said James L. Dee, never, as this defendant is now advised and be lieves, having been divorced from the said James L. Dee. But this defendant further says, that on the sixth day of April, 1868, and at the time of the ceremony hereinafter referred to, he was in formed, and then verily believed that the plain tiff had, prior to that time, been legally divorced from the said James L. Dee." The defendant's admission of the marriage is as follows : " But the defendant says that he and the said complainant were, on the said sixth day of April, 18G8, members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, and that it was a doctrine and belief of said Church, that members thereof might rightfully enter into plural or celestial marriage. And the defendant admits that on the sixth day of April, 18G8, at Salt Lake City, Utah Territory, in accordance with and pursuant to the said doctrines, customs, and belief of the said Church, a ceremony was performed to unite the plaintiff and defendant in what is known as such plural or celestial mar riage." But tbe defendant denies that on the said sixth day of April, or at any other time, he and the said plaintiff intermarried in any other or different sense or manner than that above admitted and set forth." It is an anomaly in pleading to deny that a certain marriage took place in 1868, "or," or because, certain other marriage took place in 18G3. An ar gumentative denial, like this, is not good in law. Ihe plaintiil s allegation, not being specifically de nied, is admitted. Utah Practice Act, sec. Go.) What does the subsequent express admission amount to? "Where the admissions In an answer negative its general denials, the latter may be disregarded and judgment asked upon the former, when the complaint is verihed, and the answer consists of such admis sions and denials." (Fremont el al. v. Sealt el al. 18 Cal. 433; Blood v. Light, 31 Cal. Fish v. Redington. Id. 18o.) "Aeworn answer must be consistent in itself, and must not deny in oae sen tence what it admits to be true in the next. " The object of sworn pleadings is to elicit the truth and this object must be entirely defeated if the same fact may be denied and admitted in the same pleading." (Hensley v. Tartar, li Cal. &U8.) The defendant's qualified and defective denial of the marriage of April Gth, 18G8, is consistent with his subsequent admission that the parties were intermarried on that day. Qi4 the defendant mean to hint what he did not like openly to say to the Court, that a marriage celebrated by authority of the " Church " of which he is the acknowledged head, is illegal, null, and" void ? Let us inquire whether a marriage solemnized by such authority is necessarily void. n ordinance first enacted by the so-called tate of Ieseret, and afterwards reeaacted by the Territo rial Legislative Assembly, entitled, " An Ordinance Incorporating the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter- Day baints, ' provides : "bee. 3. And be it further ordained that as said Church holds the constitu tional and original right, in common with all civil and religious communities, to worship God according to the dictates of conscience; to reverence commu nion agreeably to the principles of truth, and to so lemnize marriage, compatible with the revelations of Jesus Christ, for the security and full enjoyment of all blessings and privileges embodied in the reli gion of Jesus Christ free to all, it is also declared that said Church docs and snail possess anl enjoy continually the power and authority, in and of it self, to originate, make, pass and establish rules, regulations, ordinances, laws, customs and criterions for the eood order, safety, government, convenience, comfort and control of said Church," &c. i It may be laid down as a sound legal proposition, that a marriage solemniied in Utah, either according to the forms of the "Church" of which Brighain i Young is the head, or according to the forms of the j common law, is a lawful and valid marriage, pro- ; vided the parties to the contract are, at the time of j entering into it, legally competent to intermarry. i But the defeudant seeks to avoid the binding force i of his admitted marriage to the plaintiff on the Gth j lay of April, loi, by alleging, in ellect, that t neither of them was at that time competent to inter- marry with any persons Not only does he allege that the plaintiff was then the wife of James L I'ee, I but he further answers as follows : j "And the defendant further answering alleges, that at the town of KirtlanJ in the State of Ohio, on i the tenth day of January, 1834, this defendant, being then an unmarried man, was duly and law- j fully married to Mary Ann Angell by a minister of the gospel, who was then and there, by the laws of said tate, authorized to solemnize marriages; and that the said marriage was then and there fully con summated; and that the said Mary Ann Angell, who is still living, then and there became, and ever since has been, and still is, the lawful wife of this defendant." Thus -los the dt.'cfcdiLt not ol!j charge the r!iitij with, tat cvLfeses hlaiielf gailty cf a fclouj. His admissions, so far as they j rejudice himself oc'y. mill Le iaken as true; Lut fcta chsirges, aa ftr as they tct 1 to trj jre the p!iictiS, ir.ust L proved cr they go f.r nia;ht Tl.e J fetylact must rrove that the jlainliJ a the wiftf tf another mnn. and tht he w.e h:ai!f the habaud tf another wcraia on the C.h Jar of Aprd, cr hi aHertkns to tht tfTect can have no veigbt as against the plaintiff. There is to replicaticn to an answer under the Tractice Act cf lth, end these allegations of the defendant are denied for the plaintiff by operation cf law. "Every material allegation cf the complaint, when it is TerifiH, tot specifically controverted by the answer, shalf for the puipose of the action fce taken as true. The allegation of new matter in the answer, shall, on the trial, be deemed controverted by the adverse party." ( f'tja Practice Act.ttc. C ) "The intention of the Code is to adopt the true and jast rule that the defendant must either deny the facts as alleged, or confess and avoid them. W ben new matter exists it must be eUtea in the ( answer. ew mUter is that which, under the rules of evidence, the defendant niut affirmatively estab lish. If the onus of proof is thrown upon the defend ant, the matter to be proved bv him is new matter." (Piercy r. Subin.Xd Cal. 22.) The allegations that tbe plaintiff had another husband, and the de fendant bad another wife at the time of the marriage on the Gth day of .April, 108, are allegations of new matter, and this new matter the law denies for the plaintiff, and requires the defendant to prove. It being admitted that the parties hereto intermar ried at the time and place stated in the complaint, evidence is necessary to determine the following ques tions : 1. Was tbe plaintiff, on April Cth, 1SG8, the wife of James L. Iee? 2. Was the defendant, at Kirtland, n the State of Ohio, on the 10th day of January, 1834, lawfully married to Mary Ann ngell, and was the said Mary Ann his wife on April Cth, ISA 8? 3. If these questions shall be determined against the defendant, it will then become an important ques tion whether the defendant has treated . the plaintiff unkindly, cruelly, inhumanly, or has deserted or failed to support her; which, in his answer, the de fendant denies. If, however, the first two questions, or either of them, shall be determined against the plaintiff; or, in other words, if it shall appear that the parties knowingly entered into a polygamous or bigamous marriage, this Court will not grant the divorce prayed for. But the Court is not permitted to presume what the evidence will be. The witnesses necessary to maintain or to defeat this action are lia ble to be widely scattered in Utah, in Ohio, or else where; and the litigation is liable to be protracted and expensive. Can the Court lawfully require the defendant to pay an allowance for ad tnltrim alimony and for the expenses of prosecuting the action T The Utah statute is silent upon this question, but that silence does not answer it in the negative " The allowance for ad interim alimony does not de pend wholly upon the statute, but upon the practice of the court as It existed before the statute." lJorth v. .A orA, 1 Barb. Ch. R. 211.) In Cast v. Cast, ad interim alimony was allowed by the unanimous deci sion of tbe Supreme Court of L tan. " This question seems plain on principle. Firef, the authority to make the order belongs to the Court under the law imported by our forefathers to this country; secondly, if this were not so, still it springs up necessarily out of the legal relation of the parties, and the condition of facts appearing of record before the Court to which tbe application is made. And if any one principle of our jurisprudence is more worthy of commendation than another, it is, that the tribunals may always be pressed to action when ever the case comes within established legal rule, though not within any precedent" (2 Bithop on Marriage and Divorce, tec. S'JG. ) Chancellor Kent says : " I am entirely convinced from my own judi cial experience, that such a discretion is properly confided to the tourts." (2 Kent Com. 9'J,note.) " The power to decree alimony falls within the gen eral powers of a court of equity, aud exists inde pendently of statutory authority." (Gallaud v. Galland. 38 Cal., 2G5.) Is tbe case at bar, as it now stands in Court, a proper case for the exercise of this authority T Bishop supposes the case of a woman marrying a man and afterwards finding that he " has already another wife living, and so tbe marriage is void. She may indeed treat it as void without a judicial sentence; yet suppose, that, instead of this, she brings her suit against the man to have it decreed null. Her property is practically in his hands, though in point of law she retain the title. But since she has elected to let the Court settle the ques tion of nullity in a direct proceeding for this pur pose, she has the same claim upon the Court to have appropriated to her so much of this property as her necessities demand while the suit is going on, as though she alleged the marriage to be valid, and sought its dissolution for a cause occurring subse quently to the nuptials. In like manner, where the man seeks to establish the nullity of his marriage on the allegation that the woman has a former husband living, she may have alimony pending the suit, and money to defend." (2 Bishop on Mar. and Div. sec. 402.) "And this is so, even though it is alleged that the marriage was brought about by the fraudu lent practices of the supposed wife, and though the costs of the suit may ultimately be awarded against her." (Id. vote 2.) In a case in New York, in which the supposed wife alleged marriage and cohabitation, the supposed hus band denied tbe marriage but did not deny tbe co habitation; and thereupon Vice-Chancellor McCoun made the allowance of temporary alimony, and money to carry on the suit. (id. sec. 404.) In the case at bar the defendant both admits the marriage and fails to deny the cohabitation. " Where upon an application for temporary ali mony and an allowance for expenses, the facts undis puted are such as that from them a presumption arises that the parties were married, so that the affirmitive rests upon the defendent to repel that pre sumption, the Court has jurisdiction and power to grant the application, although marriage, in fact, is denied." (Brinkley v. Brinkley, 50 V. Y., 184 ) " The ad interim alimony and money to sustain the expenses are given, not as of strict right in the wife, but of sound discretion in the Court. Yet the discretion is a judicial, not an arbitrary one. And when a case is brought within the principles recog- j nized as entitling the wife to the allowance, the allowance follows pretty much as of course, without inquiry into the merits of the case. If, for example, she is plaintiff, it is no objection that the husband denies her charges under oath." (2 Bishop on Marriage and Divorce, sec. 406.) Owing to the peculiar notoriety of the parties, and to the importance of this case in the jurisprudence of Utah, it has been deemed desirable to show, even at the risk of being elementary, that this case comes clearly within the principles universally recognized as giving a woman who is a party to a suit for divorce, a just claim for alimony and sustenance; " the one being for the defraying of the ordinary ex penses of the wife in the matter of living; the other being for the same purpose in respect to the matter of the suit." (Id. tec. 387.) It now becomes important to inquire what princi ples must guide the Court in fixing the amount of the allowance in this case. " As a general proposition, the fund out of which the wife is entitled to her alimony is the income of the husband, from whatever source derived or de rivable." (Id. sec. 447.) " The ordinary rule of temporary alimony is to allow the wife about one-fifth of the joint income. This is regarded as a fair medium, though the proportion will vary according to cir cumstances. When the necessities and claims of the wife have been large, one-fourth has been allotted; and Sir John Nickoll, in one case granted the wife JS-jO per year out of an income of 140 On thf mhpr hnnd. in different and peculiar i " X j circumstances, the wife has been obliged to accept I as small a proportion as one-eighth." (Id. sec. 4G0.) " Alimony pendente lite is usually made, by ' the terms of the order itself, to commence from the i return cf the citation. This is the true role. ! But it may be maJe to commence earlier or later." 1 (,. sec. 424 ; Burr v. Burr, 7 Hill 207 j The plaintiff alleges in her complaint " that the : defendant was, at the time cf her said marriage, i ever Eince then hat been, and is yet, the owner in ! his own right, of vast wealth, amounting to several ! millions of dollars, and is in the monthly receipt of i an income therefron of not less than forty thousand ' dollars;" and she prays for an ad interim allowance 1 of one thousand dodars per month. j On the other hand, the defendant " denies that he j- is or has been the owner of wealth amounting to l several millions of dollars, or that he is or has been I in the monthly receipt from his property of forty thousand dollars or more. On the contrary the de fendant alleges, that according to his best knowledge, . information and belief, all his property taken to- getber, does not exceed in value the sum of six hun i drei thousand dollars, and that his gross income from all of his property, and every source, does not ! exceed six thousand dollars per month." ! "And the defendant denies that one thousand : dollars, or any ot'aer sum exceeding one hundred dollars per month, would be a reasonable allowance to the plain'iff, even if defendant was under any legal obligation to provide for the maintenance, education and proper medical attendance of said plaintiff and her children during this litigation." Under all the circumstances of this case, it seems just that the defendant should pay to the plaintiff, to defray the expenses of prosecuting this action, the sum of three thousand dollars; and that he should pay to her. for her maintenance, and for the mainte nance and education of her children, thefurther sum of five hundred dollars per month, to commence from the day of the filing of the complaint hcreirw It is ordered accordingly. Bets are made in London that the Prince of Wales will be assassinated before his return from India. Pleasant speculation! J. S. CURNEY, tOM(TI, TOBirro IM Blllim MLOOV No. li uur.a Slir-rt, 1 Joc-fa K rg I'lJiMllfrft M the rr,Ec. Ji tmra t HIM). H. HACKFELD & CO.. EXPECT TO RECEIVE PER GERMAN BARK CEDER, SHKTLY M E FUM BUKUES ( A WELL SELECTED CARGO OK j EGL1SII. GEliM AV & KHEMH (iOOfis! (taUtiug ia Tart af the IoIUhIe-: A Full A"orliiient f iind desirable Print, j.11 stjb' new pattern. While Collou. Horn.ck'ti White Long CUilh, Coll-ill. HorrockV White Long A. 11. and 11. Brown and Blue Cotton Drill, Brown Cotton Blue C Uton, Heavy IVniiiiK, Hiekury Siripes Bed Tkkiug. Turkey Bed Cotton, Blue Flannels, White Linen, assorted widths and qualities, Water proof Cloth, White Moleskin, Fint French Merinos, Beps, Buckskin, Fine Cassimeres, Black and Blue Broadcloths Mosquito Netting, Linen and Col ton Sewing Thread. Altutubra Bedqiiilts, A Splendid Assortment of Clothing Fancy Flannel Shirls. Denim Jumpers and Overalls, Fine Merino Undershirts, Merino Socks, Cotton Socks and Stockings, Silk, Linen and Cotlou Haiidkerrhief. Heavy Bhtnkels, Fine Silk Umbrella. Linen Sheeting. Assorted Burlaps and Woolpark, Sail Twine Imperial Navy Hemp Canvas, No. Oil to G, Hair and Cloth BrusheH, from J.(I.nell X Co Fancy Soaps and Hair Oil. Shawls, l'onchos, I'laids, Needlework. Imitation Jewelry, Lockets, Kings, Chains, Ornaments, I. A 1. Knives, Scissors, Corkscrews, Tinned Spurs. Axes, French Calfskins, Wrapping and Printing Paper, A VERY FULL ASSORTMENT OF GERMAN. ENCLISH & FRENCH Orooerios. Stearin Candles, Ultramarine Blue, Epsom Salts, Castor Oil, Fence Wire, No. 4, a and C, Galvanized Iron Pipe, j and 3 inch, Hoop Iron, J, J, 1 aud 1J, inch, Rivets, Paints aud Oils, White Zinc, White Lead, Ac", Caustic Soda and Palm Oil, Hide Poison, Market Baskets, Brooms, Casks and Barrels, Casks Blacksmiths' Coal, 300 Tons Best Steam Coal, Also a few Music Boxes ,V Regulator Clocks, A Fine Assortment of Havana Cigars, English and (Jerman Ale, Bavarian Beer, in qts. and pis. Champagne, ltuinart pere and fils, qts. Jfc pts. Champagne, Heidsieck fc Co., qts. and pts. Champagne. Thoreau, qts. and pts. Sparkling Hock, Rhine Wines, Claret, Gin, in green boxes, Samples now Open at our Office, and Sales made to Arrive, T" Orders from Other I.-lands Filled. H. HACKFELD &CO. Have Just Received -PER- HAW'N BARK R. C. WYL1E FROM LONDON. THE FOLLOWING GOODS WHICH THEY OFFER FOR SALE. JROCERIES, lit CUt t'K'S PAINT OIL, White Zinc. White Lead, Yenetiun Rd, Yellow Ochre, Caustic Soda, C. C. Tin PUle, Sheet Lead, Sauce Pans, Tea Kettles. Sheet Zinc, Galvanized Tubs. Fence Wires, Refined Iron, White Bros, Portland Cement, Gunny Bags, Burlaps Bags, Printing Paper. Petroleum Barrels, New Oil Shook?, Yienna Furniture, Boutelleau & Cos., Brandy, in glass, one to four diamond, Boutelleau &. Cos.. Biandv in Casks, Gin in Cases. Norwegian Ale, Cordage. Window Glass, Ac, Jtc, Ac. FIREWOOD! FIREWOOD ! ! L1ROM EAST MAPI. L1 uiO FOR SALE R liOLLKS At CO. FINE MANILA CIGARS, 1 NEW INVOICEOF VERT SUPERIOR 4 or Ml ri For Sale by dim-t (roin Manilla. o3u ' poi.i i:j at co. CALIFORNIA OAT HAY, E EIVED PER D. C. Ml'HK A V AND For Sale by BOI.LE3 4- CO HsRY BELLE ROBERTS oiiO MEW GOODS, .f.ATl-:srr AKHIVAKS Xnsvo ile :iiii:i, Viiy at .llelhoiiriu. II. C !Iurr:iy , aiitl S3 mi, Uy A , K KIN K I IVMIItl'M K NT Ot -t I N I IN III M II k I', t , l'l.4l Ol.OHO I f hi !! dik ol n'-. l .' !.. tro.n( 1'ii.t. W li ! M -. W ,u (mi.h. pbrttiaf. 4 rpTuc iortiBi.l J W i. rjirtJ.. oil I I c u n Gontloinon's Wofvr ! FINEST UI.ACK HKO IK'I.OT II tll IMIKMI. til, WOlll. T KKKS UIIITIC AMI III IT I.I.NEN PICK . FIF. WHITE M(H.lil. FINEST WIIIIE M AHSF.Il.I.E" V F.STI CJ. I.I N F.N r.T I I FFV IIIIOWN I.INEV l II I AIt RKCFIVKII riK-jr Wj. I Hv,r)iirt, C.sl-n t'n.l. r.lort.. ir. W.- Ilm.n.1, in rv, M. ,1mm )VrM fWniwS A Trw Piw io. . 9 n.l 12 sKV tit K HKlH liUAIN KtlHoNS. Mill lirr. Knuu l.)-r ll Cta.fc, All Uarn Nkm. Jl Cf:. MiquiU eUiiC. Itlue FUi.i.. I. 4 I- I'INF. III,4('K 1.4 MA I. ICE Ml XV I.S. TM- lumi.k. Iwia. Vril liar?. . IH.rk Hair r..lh. M. 11. n .l. Ac Aljs,( t Jirllon't Ci'klil-I Anawti-J I'll,-. Hal. Iiall foiekl rr-iu rtail '!, 3.1 I'm mn4 lmh, awrt.Nl ir. Rilti'R HONS O'l.MiK A I U fl'TI.MlV -.-...... T. K lul l.r .a. I T.fcW Kmvr, a few rt. of thHr ! X.I'T I'lalrJ Kflr; ttrllf timt i . T ! I i h tmii-.l, IVarl VrH aiul J-hirt Boit'm. twal qaalilic l"ih an.l fJ IJtir in tr.1v. M.-arh.sl an. I I'nlka. I.rj, Caul Huri U t l.aJte-a, Carry ami Mane t' ml', Itckhi f. 4 t. n, 10 It fW. ' Tu. krr Hall. hmgf, ll.am.4. r-k in., la Krlll- 3 aixl S quart. lal au-il W.ih !.in. tialtaiersl Tut. li lo in T II .. . It tw M.I vara NwJlrr HEsr ANNEALED (Ml TIUIUH Na. FEM'INU Willi'. IUMmkV ; lloilrj aittl Raw LinaW Oil. linbtwrk'a M l,i(r 7jik au..l la-l. A.irt--. I'a.uH dim tut Or aioJ Umi. Vhm. t'rvain Tartar, INir VI hit Castile K..p. ar.lln., l r. ii.-li ll.., V ! tM.rr. WUiWif and t'haik. lt-.a, I S 4 anj '2 inch; Ov " 4. A ami Pan ri.ra. a:lr t i.l '.M Il... I ilri I'.utiK, itarr.iaa, I'ulKvalur awl lluca Hon, llOWNEKVS K KUOMCN E Ol I. Il K EC V IKUM mMK O.iUl'ASI, Inh'i Oil. g-otkl ami chrji. , . i Alto on Hand. A General Assortment of Agricultural Implements! A FEW DOZEN WAUO A PAYNE'S C'EI.EIilt ATEI N. US SIIKEI MIEAHM, THE 1IK.-T yl At.ITV MAPK. The alov with many olher artwl to I IunJ at LOW T I'MCM, al , , 971 FEOWDE VIBE -! ! PI7IT tm ISOS. 4, 5, n nd O. O-alvaxiizcd Corrugated BLooQxig ! r HUIIBI'C'K'S IT KE WHITE ZINC? AM" LEAP. IlllllM C'K'S IIKT PAI.K IIOII.EO LINSEED OIL. .-, A FINE ASST. OF SHELF PAINTS, ALL COLORS TURPENTINE, VAHNISIIES. PAINT EK'M HARD W A II E, a noon stock IMPLEMENTS. Will be Sold sit By ocSO LUMBER, LUMBER ! LEVERS AND DICKSON AT THEIR OLD STAND - ON Fort. King and Merchant Sts HAVE ON HAND AND FOR MA LE, NORT WEST Boards, Flanks and Battens. Nor West Tongued and Grooved Boards, Nor West Surfaced Planed Boards 13 X "7V O O Rough and Planed Boards. Redwood Battens and Clapboards, Redwood Tongued and Grooved Boards, VHITE CEDAR AND REDWOOD SHINGLES! DOORS, MOWS AID BLUBS! Nails, Locks, Butts and Screws, OIL, WHITE LEAD, ZINC PAINT. Turpentine, Chrome Green, Paris Green, Chrome Yellow, Red Lead, Black Paint. Varnishes, Burnt and Raw TJmber, Venitian Red, Yellow Ochre, &c, &c. METALLIC PAINT FOtt PLANTATION VfK WHITE ASH BOARDS & PLANKS, - FOR WIIKKLWBIOIIT AND PLANTATION IfK WHITE EASTERN PINE BOARDS AND PLANKS. WVTlJ PAPER ! AND ALL OTHER BUILDIXG MATERIALS ! LEWERS & DICKSON. im,2 Zm Blocks and Qars! FI LL ASSORTMENT Fir Hale by HOLLE. A Ct Wilmington Fitch ! DECEIVED PER CETLON. AND FOR (aUlt) . . BOI.LKS A 1 O. ML Ml le by KEW GOODS !' 1ST XD OOO li. n4 on o l !:. CASTLE & COOKE'S. WIRE I II III!: ! ! ! IIRI MIES, A FINIi LOT OF III OF AURICI'LTIK AL 1 1 n; JtKGIPKOCITV IIlIGi:S ! ! DILLINGHAM & CO.. f Ac 07 KlNg HtrrH, llawalala. 1 O TS BY THE UNDERSIGNED! 1 1 fi'a fJ EX X o -ULt o 3La 1 ix iX.CL. f'ONS II F.ST NMITH'N l IAL. 1m Hi l tiljt.rnv f bnl Ukm Cnt, t.nt Inn, In Am.4tr4 Hiset, 11 M K J I J 1 OI0 C'ORIJ r A LH ! to 1 !'!. "( Hi' vi lirtklt-il Mkiiufkrluxt iA Jitu (iillua A Co., OU, AIMO, A IT.W ! Smith & Wcllstood's Celebrated STOVES & RANGES! Iliirlity Hi-couiRirmUd I'V Hi'- alio ! tri-l lUm. Ull on liiii'l Hid will l ui J ii4 ki lw Utet lorail ib Tlait. A LfO, Til Jh:r2 FOLLOWING IYIACHINERY.1 - ONE M (.'Alt .MILL, COMPLETE! THREE WKSTON'I V ENTU I FLU A I. MA KINK! t F I V E S I E A M ' L A R I Fl Etta, 4 OO mm iOO ti ALLONH. i) n v (; o o i) s f rnf Iohn IDoajprljitlonai I PER DARK D. C. MURRAY. I.I ftUO US Ce llilii ick' t'lmmiMirn. An'rtr. Isruii-I 1 lmmj.fii Oxnrt ln,i,r.y' , 'l rnl I) fir Miknily, '. Aiv.iU I l:rn'l l;rai.'ly, n.. tt .'Urel, Cam !! -I ( t'li U!,iky.l twl ISi it IUIUiiiI (lln, I'.ukett i ll'.lLoJ m, Kki )uK- Caii-a II' U ! I T'uii . .'- Alerted Clareti, II EST AMERICAN V II I S K I CHI OrciJeuUI, IJi rti.rt kiid O. t. C. ; , li:.UI.IOIINH A. L( (MIOL, C- I!' hI Tale Hhrrry,C'ne l?et Ol.l Tori, Wurt-r Cull llt-iiii'ny' I'ale Braudr, CarlT 'ak. I'ale Xl-rry, g i .rt. r i'a'ki Irih W lnnkey, QuartrrCatkt Jaasuiia Kuril, McEWAN'S INDIA PALE ALE. I'inl aivt jnrl. Mvh. ViiMi- k -" In.lla I'alo Air, ihlanl quarti l:,in Ai ' Inl.a VaW A I.', .nil ai..l i(url; OrariK'" H;U'T, . AIJ-O i ' . . JIST REfEU'EU I'EiX EA i WAN'S XVX STOI 'l I I. Ml AMI l Tort Mint, In 3 doz. r.; Sdrrr) Uor, ! S itr. tt. or fl I'FUIOIl QI'AMTV. , Ml F. T- LENEIIAN V CQ. .11 !";- Ml . t ' I r. )i in ' c ( I' 1 1 M. ' u V. I i r iLt. I So. , J,) ' I M 1 1 r. at i w at t t i. it 1 . ' X '4 v luuceetts" to 'tliejTaymen"t "jrlf ' Buttonj,"ci6rette PKr, etc., etc. iV. 16 MERCHANT Jt-t