The Catholic times. [volume], December 10, 1954, Image 4

About The Catholic times. [volume] (Columbus, Ohio) 1951-current

Image provided by: Ohio History Connection, Columbus, OH

                
4—THE CATHOLIC TIMES
Friday. Doc. 10. 1954
oik
THE
CATHOLIC TIMES
Published Every Week by
The Catholic Times, Inc.
Columbus. Ohio
NOTICE: Send All Changes of Address to
P. O Box 636 Columbus. Ohio
Executive and Editorial Offices:
246 E Town Street, Columbus 15 Ohio
Address all communications for publication
Io P. O Box 636. Columbus 16. Ohio
Telephones (A 4-5195 CA 4-5196
Price of The Catholic Time* i* $3 per year. All
•inscriptions ho u Id he presented to our office through
the pastor* of the cmrfohee.
Remittances should be made payable to The Catb-
I im*».
Anonymous com municat ions will be disregarded.
e do not hold ourselves responsible for any views
or opinions expressed in the communications of our
cor’e- nun dents.
kntPr^ a. Swnnd Claw Matter at Port Office.
C-'it«nbuf. Ohm.
St. Frarri« He Sales. Patron of the Catholie Preea.
Prav fur ua
This Paper Printed by Union Labor
A New Brand On
I he Market?
Axuch has been said within the past few months
about peaceful co-existence—its possibility and de
sirability. Muchxmore will be said before this knotty
problem is solved to the satisfaction of the world
community.
There are those among government leaders in
countries not officially given over to the doctrine
of communism that believe—in the face of denials
(if not in word, at least in action) by the leaders
of communism—that such a state of living could
be. worked out. We don't believe it, unless com
munist doctrine and philosophy were radically
changed.
This is just the point, though. Many, including
the communist policy makers, wmuld have us be
lieve that such a change is coming about. We are
witnessing today a new tack in communist policy:
going easy on the persecution of religion. We read
every day of new overtures on the part of Russia
and Yugoslavia, both following the same line, to
convince the world that they are having a change
of heart that here is a new communism which
will be acceptable to the free nations of the world.
We are advised more and more to buy by the
"brand name” to be sure of what we are receiving.
We are told that purchasing in this manner assures
us nf obtaining just exactly what we want. It in
sures us against receiving substitutes inferior to
the desired quality which we want.
This is all very nice and handy, and wp sub
scribe to it. But it, unfortunately, can be carried
too far in some applications. The old saw: "A rose
hy any other etc.” still holds good, even in re
verse, You will never be ahle to change the con
tents of the can by altering the title on its label.
Atheistic Communism will always be just that, with
all its degrading, immoral characteristics, no mat
ter what guise it is given or what name it is
called- by.
It is discouraging to find some people, who
should know better, atting and speaking in such
a way that would seem to imply that there is a
difference in “brands” of communism.
For instance: We all know the “Old Joe" Russian
brand of communism, so familiar for so many years.
We knew exactly what we were buying when we
dealt w,th him—or with Tito, Mao or any of the
rest of them, for that matter—Godlessness, whole
sale murder, false imprisonment, truthlessness, the
loss of individual freedom and, in short, practically
the opposite nf everything we know as moral.
Now, however., we are being asked to reconsider.
We are being shown a product with the name “Athe
istic” deleted from the label. And many people are
going to he fooled into buying this brand
No matter what beguiling pronouncements comp
from the Kremlin or from Belgrade beamed to the
outside world t*^aell this new brand of commun
ism, we can be suiX by listening to official pro
nouncements with these countries themselves, that
their basic philosophy has changed not one iota,
ommunixm will live with religion only as long as
It suits the communist policy. The two, and all that
they stand for. are diametrically opposed, and will
remain so until one changes so much as to be no
longer existant.
I^et no one be fooled by the new communist
propaganda. Communism is still communism, no
matter what the lahe) on the can says.
A Call To Action
The 5 2 decision handed down last week by the
Flhio State Supreme Court which held as unlawful
any censoring order made by the Department of
Education in regard to films to he shown through
out the state, should not he taken as the death
knell of film censorship but rather only as a rally
ing cry for those interested in seeing moral enter
tainment insured in our theatres.
Stemming as it does from the United States
'Supreme Court's ruling that the Ohio law as it
’now stands, is not specific enough in its wonting,
.the new decision by the state court should not he
looked on as a new, or telling blow at censorship.
It was bound to come in the tide of the previous
•ruling by the highest court in the land.
leaving clear the way for some future legisla
tion to govern the censoring of films, this newest
-action should hr a signal to get busy now tn in
sure the passage in the coming session of the legis
lature of adequate laws enabling the Department
of Education to continue its fine work in guarding
the nublic from the evils of immoral entertainment.
Every one should be prepared, when the time
comes, to lend the sentiments and support to the
framing of this new law. It should be in the inter
e ts of all to see to it that the members of the legis
lature he apprised of the need for immediate action
,‘nn this subject. You can be sure that the opponents
nf film censorship are busy right now in their own
interests.
Governor Lausche has voiced the hope that “the
Parent-Teachers Associations, the churches and other
agencies concerned with juvenile delinquency and
the development nf a better moral code will inter
rt themselves in support of the adoption of a law
that will properly cope with the problem.”
It is our hope that they will heed this call to
action.
St. Anthony Addition
Dedication Wednesday of a $1,000,000 addition
tn St. Anthony Hospital was a reflection of an
achievement of a most gratifying nature The new
structure will stand as a memorial to resourceful
ness, faith, patience and service nn the part of all
those associated with its building.
Completion nf the new wing comes at a time
when the additional facilities it will provide are
desperately needed St. Francis, the city’s oldest
hospital which carries a giant load of the com
munity’s hospital needs, has announced its closing
4n the near future. St. Anthony will be looked to
to fill a portion of the gap left by the closing.
But while St. Anthony Hospital is well on its
way to meeting increased responsibilities, it even
now it handicapped to a great extent. It is putting
60 new beds into service, but will wind up with
a net gain of only 35 beds—240 to 275. Expansion
pf laboratory and X-ray facilities will absorb a por
tion of the space now used for h|ds.
But the potential for increased bed space in
the near future is good, dependent somewhat nn
the will of the community. The new wing consists
of a basement and four above-ground stories. Avail
able funds, however, are so limited that only the
basement and two floors can be put into immedi
ate service.
The two other floors will be put into service
when the $30,000 needed to equip them and the
problem of staffing them can be met.
Columbus is a fast-growing community and
unfortunately its hospital building program, while
stepped up considerably in recent years, still lags
far behind the needs.
The additional space now to be available at St.
‘Anthony is most welcome. This hospital which is
the only one in the city providing care for the,
chronically ill, now will provide more of the gen
eral hospital services. The best wishes of a grateful
community will accompany St. Anthony Hospital as
it takes a second breath and moves forward info
the forefront of institutions providing valuable and
necessary services to the people of the community
in their hours of illness and distress.
Guest Editorial Ohio State Journal
Just Among Ourselves
Passing Comment Considered or Inconsiderate
The Marian Year has come to a eJose. We are to
see in the years that lie immediately ahead the
fruits of its observing. For the Year was designated
as a time in which to stir up in Christian hearts
anew and lasting spirit of .eligion. And it was meant
to show to mankind that the readiest way to Christ
is the way in which Christ came to mankind, that is,
through the Immaculate Mother of God.
The non-Catholic world has never understood,
and refuses to understand, the true attitude of a
Christian towards the Blessed Mother. Yet nothing
could be more reasonable, more sane, than that
attitude. Only bigotry can perversely refuse to see
that attitude for what it is, distorting it, misrepre
senting it, and then condemning it.
Those who dislike devotion to the Blessed Virgin
say that we are meant to pay honor to God alone.
Yet God’s own word tells us to honor our parents,
and St. Paul, speaking by the inspiration of the
Holy Ghost, says, “Fear God honor the king.” We
are to give divine honor to God alone. But we are to
honor and reverence God’s image in all men, and
God’s authority in parents and justly established
rulers.
Surely, then, we are to honor Mary if we arc to
honor every child of God. If what we do to the
least of God’s human creatures is done to God,—
and Our I^ord Himself says that this is so,—cer
tainly what we do to the greatest of human crea
tures is done to God. Ordinate reverence paid to
the Blessed Virgin is reverence paid to God Himself.
For the Blessed Virgin is God’s masterpiece,
“our tainted nature's solitary boast." In honoring
her we honor the Master. All that we honor in Mary
is the work of God, and she herself deciares that
if is God who has made her worthy of our honor
and reverence. She says that all generations shall
call her blessed, because “He that is Mighty hath
done great things to me.”
When we are accused of Mariolatry, we declare
with simple truth that the accusation is false. The
ending of a word in latry (from the Greek latria
which means divine worship) indicates that divine
worship, or a fanatical demotion, is paid to the per
son or thug indicated by the first part of the word.
Thus idolatry means divine worship paid to idols
ronlatry means divine worship ol animals stateolatry
means fanatical devotion paid to the civil rule even
in matters that contravene the natural and divine
law.
Catholics give to Mary neither divine worship nor
fanatical devotion. They merely accept the Blessed
Mother as God has given her to us. And God has
made her the channel of His coming in the Incar
nation. For this wonderful office, he has kept her
from every stain of original sin and from every
actual sin. without at all interfering with her human
free will. He has endowed her with every gift and
grace the angel of the Annunciation saluted her as
“full of grace.” God has given her the two glories
of womanhood which are found united in no other
she is both virgin and mother.
Is it unreasonable to honor her whom God
has honored above every creature? Is it taking away
honor from God when we honor Him in his most
perfect and dearest image? No it is the person
who refuses to honor the Blessed Mother who dis
honors God. No one can treat a mother with neglect
or disrespect without offending her devoted son.
And Mary’s Son is God himself.
Anyone who refuses to look into the sheer logic
of the matter, may take instruction from the facts
of human history. For he slorj of heresies is
largely the story of people who loudly proclaim
‘heir belief in Christ as God and their exclusive
devotion to Christ. They have no time nor regard
for the saints, especially the Queen of Saints. And
what happens is that very soon they cease to ha\e
belief in Christ.
Thousands today call themselves Christian with
out having any real belief in the divinity or God
head of Christ. They regard Him as a great Teacher,
as a Leader, but not as a Divine Teacher or a Leader
who is God made-Man. They do not hesitate,—air
unconscious of blasphemy in the act,—to compare
mere men with Christ, and to set Christ on a level
with Confucius, or Socrates, or even Buddha.
Catholics venerate the Blessed Virgin with a re
ligious veneration that is greater than that paid
to any of the holy men and women called Saints.
This is right and reasonable and in full accord with
what God has manifested But Catholics never adore
the Blessed Virgin with divine adoration. They know
that while Mary is the most nohle and holy of all
creatures, she is a creature. They understand that
her sublime part in the workings of Providence is
the part assigned to her hy the Infinite God.
Catholics sec in Mary not only an ideal that is
to he admired and loved. They know her as a
Mother, and as an active and most powerful inter
cessor of God. It was by her own free* human
will, albeit a will filled and supported by God's
grace, that Mary consented to be the Mother of the
Savior. She might have refused: she might have
shrunk from the tremendous dignity and responsi
bility of her vocation. But she did not refuse she
consented fully to the fulfillment of God’s will in
her. And for that consent, every human being, from
greatest to least, owes her unending gratitude,
love, and honor.
For it was hy Mary’s consent to do what God
would have her do, that mankind was (men its
chance to rise from sin and work towards neaven.
We have redemption and the chance of salvation,
and the needful grace for salvation, from Christ
God has given us “all things together with Him.”
And, in God’s marvellous plan, we have Christ
through Mary.
Plain, ordinary gratitude, if nothing else, ought
to make every man a devoted child and client of
Mary. May 1hc Marian Year, just closed, continue
its effect in making us continuously aware of that
fact.
J? I
-Ji
WASHINGTON LETTER
WASHINGTON Something
is about to happen here which
could take place only in a genu
ine democracy.
The Government of the United
States is going to be held up to
scrutiny, and it is going to be
told to change some of the ways
it does business.
Citizens are going ip do the
talking, but they will be some
200 of the best thinkers and
"doers” in the country. They
will call for the most complete
overhauling ever made in func
ions of our Government.
Come January, and the 84th
Congress, the second Hoover
Commission (the second Commis
sion on the Organization, of the
Executive Branch) will begin to
make a series of reports. The
first Hoover Commission (1947
1950 dealt with the organiza
tional set up of the various Gov
ernment departments and agen
cies. It made 273 recommenda
tions for changes in organiza
tion, and 196 of these already
have been put into effect. A
dozen more have been made ob
solete through the passage of
time and the introduction of oth
er changes. Still others are in
the process of being worked out.
So, the Hoover Commission is
no debating society or scholastic
LOUIS l\ III DENI
The national drama now un
folds the poisonous purpose be
hind “the battle against Mc
Carthyism.” As the'Communists
promised and
planned, this
battle is to be
extended into
“a stru 1 e
against Know
1 a n i s m,”
which is depict
ed as bringing
war down upon
our heads in
stead o-f
“peaceful coex
istence.” The Red barrage which
is now being laid down for Sta
lin’s “coexistence” slogan is af
fecting many outstanding news
papers and Washington itself,
preparing the way for new sur
renders by the United States in
the Far East.
This column has repeatedly
pointed out that the Daily Work
er months ago began an assault
on the “Knowland Me a y
gang.” The Senator from Cali
fornia earned the ire of the Red
conspiracy in that he recom
mended the only realistic and
sound American policy, the
breaking of all relations with So
viet Russia and its satellite re
gimes. Over against any such de
fense of the United States, the
Soviet fifth column had long ago
offered us the overdose of po
litical sleeping pills fraudulant
‘ly termed "peaceful coexist
ence.”
Drug Official Washington
One of the chief conditions
laid down by Dictator Malenkov
in August, 1953, and by his
agent, William Z. Foster, in the
August, 1954, Political Affairs,
was American betrayal of For
mosa, accompanied by the recog
nition of Red China. That was
the first way wc could get
“peaceful coexistence” hut it was
to be followed hy many other
Peaceful Coexistance
JUST LET ME TIE YOU Uf
AfTD TAKE OVER Mt KE
AHO EVERYTHING MA
BE
o
This Could Only Happen Here
seminar. Its recommendations
carry weight. The first such
group having been largely suc
cessful in reorganizing the set
up of government departments,
the second has concerned itself
with the functions of these re
organized departments, bureaus
and agencies. Il’s a real big
“renovating job.”
The first Hoover Commission
effected a threc-billion-d o 11 a
saving in a 40 billion dollar bud
get, but this was lost when war
came and the budget jumped to
70 billion dollars a year. The
second Hoover Commission hopes
to effect savings in the present
huge budget.
The functions of government
have to do with the way its agen
cies carry out their work. Today,
the functions of the U.§. Gov
ernment are large, extensive
and varied. For example, Gov
ernment agencies write as many
as 4.000,000 letters each day, or
more than a billion a year. A
billion letters, stacked one on
top of another, would reach 390
miles into the stratosphere. The
Government carries on activities
in many different parts of the
world. Furthermore, the Gov
ernment is in a great many more
kirfds of business than most peo
ple suspect. It is, for example, a
Now It Is “Knowlandism”
conditions which would lead us
into “negotiations” that would
disarm and destroy the United
States.
Now on November 19, the Dai
ly Worker gives lengthy direc
tives to its followers on the pos
sibility of weakening the will of
the present Administration in
Washington by an all-out assault
on “Knowlandism.” A wedge is
to be driven between the Execu
tive Department and the Cali
fornia Senator’s proposals, just
as a similar wedge was created
in the battle against McCarthy
ism.”
The Red organ makes no
bones about the fact that this en
tire campaign to drug official
Washington with “peaceful co
existence" is immediately design
ed to achieve the conquest of
Formosa and the recognition of
Red China. Of course, with the
usual Communjst duplicity, it
brings this argument forward in
the form of accusing those forces
who support Senator Knowland
of wanting to bring on war. That
is an old and tiresome theme,
one that might be thought to be
thoroughly exploded by now. But
many intelligent Americans still
fall victims to it.
"Peace" Merged Wtih Aggression
The New York Times was not
slow in follow ing the lead of the
.Daily Worker in this area, just
as it so quickly responded to
the Red demand to crush “Mc­
Carthyism” On November 26,
only one week after the Daily
Worker directives, the Tinies re
repeats the same arguments in
its leading editorial entitled
“Knowlandism.” This distinguish
ed paper which is considered al
most sacrosanct in certain col
leges, links up the batttt' against
“McCarthyism" and the struggle
against “Knowlandism" just as
the Communists do. This newspa
per, w’ith its extensive facilities.
baker and a launderer, among
other things.
The second Hoover Commis
sion no doubt expects to find
economies, and improve efficien
cy, in all three directions.
The commission is made up of
12 members. The President ap
pointed four, the Vice President
four and the Speaker of the
House of Representatives four.
Its members are Democrats and
Republicans in equal propor
tions. Those members who are
in the Government serve without
compensation. Those from pri
vate life get a per diem allow
ance for the time they are ac
tually engaged in commission
work. Herbert Hoover, the itoritr
man, a former President of the
United States, devotes virtually
all of his time to the commis
sion, working 12 to 14 hours
every day, his associates report.
James A. Farley, former Post
master General, and Joseph P.
Kennedy, former U.S. Ambassa
dor to Great Britain, are mem
bers of the commission.
Neil MacNeil, retired manag
ing editor of The New York
Times, is editorial director of
the commission. He calls its
work “real democracy in action.”
A thing like this simply couldn’t
happen in Soviet Russia, he
points out.
is evidently unaware that the
Soviet fifth column, in its secret
conference of September, 1953,
laid down precisely this form of
program, and published the re
sults in a widely distributed
booklet, “New Opportunities in
the Fight for Peace and De
mocracy.”
In that booklet it was said—as
this column has stated on sev
eral occasions that “the strug
gle against McCarthyism” must
be merged with “the fight for
peace”—that is, for new Soviet
aggression under the cloak of
“peaceful coexistence.”
Once more, then. Moscow’s
program for our annihilation by
the “encirclement” of the United
States the program laid down
by Stalin in 1939 is moving
forward and is being accepted
in official Washington. It can
be halted if from all parts of
America there will arise a de
mand for the breaking off of.
relations with. Soviet Russia and
its satellites, accompanied by a
continued vigorous probing of
the conspiracy in this country.
This is a duty to which every
American who values his free
dom must be dedicated.
Good Omen
Encouragement can be given
to all of us in raising this is
sue in local organizations,
the press, and with our repre
sentatives' in Washington by
the stand of such splendid gen
tlemen as General Stratemeyer,
General Van Fleet, and Admiral
Standley. By heading the Com
mittee of 10.000,000 Americans,
they have struck a blow’ for the
United States and against Soviet
psychological warfare.
That the spirit of these men
has not been crushed is a good
omen for us all. With the same
courage, and with knowledge of
Red methods, we can imitate
their example by defeating the
fraud of “peaceful coexistence."
Inquiry Corner
Q. What do we know about St.
Anne
A. From the Bible we can
learn nothing about her. Tradi
tion and Various legends supply
the name and few details of her
life. “The Protevangelium of
James” tells us that she was,
like Joachim, her husband, of
the tribe of Juda. It further re
lates that they had great herds
and that they were a saintly cou
ple, but that they had no chil
dren until Anne was at an ad
vanced age. Her feast day is Ju
ly 26th.
Q. If Christ is the Mediator
how can the priest forgive sins?
A. Christ is the One Mediator,
who redeemed us and pours His
graces upon us. He gives us the
supernatural life of sanctifying
giace through mediators whom
He appointed (Matthew 28.19-20)
and He restores it and increases
it through these same successors
of the Apostles. He gave the
Apostles power to forgive sins
(John 20:19-23) and explicitly
said, “as the Father has sent Me
I also send you.” In the Ads of
the Apostles, the Epistles of St.
Paul and Tradition we find the
record of the delegating of this
power which comes down to our
own day for our happiness and
salvation.
Q. If the people are to take
par* in the Mass actively why is
the language they do not under
stand still retained?
A. The participation of the
people does not depend upon the
language used by the priest at
the altar anyone who cares to can
have a missal in his own lan
guage. Further, the Mass is a
Sacrifice and anyone can enter
into the ACTION of the Mass
without following every word.
While the use of the Missal is
the best way to take part in the
Mass the principle was laid down
by St. Pius X: “Don’t prav AT
Mass, PRAY THE MASS.”’ The
priest is the chief and official
offerer of the Mass and the
people are supposed to unite
their prayers and offering with
his. The priest then is not
speaking TO the people (as a
rule the Dominus vobiscum
and Oremus would be excep
tions) but to God. He is speak
irfk to God and the people should
be praying with him rather than
listening to him. Latin as a
MONSIGNOR HIGGINS
Father Healey---------------—
bond of unity and stability can
not be easily displaced. It ser
ves beautifully as a universal
language for a universal (ca
tholic) Church.
Q. What answer can 1 make
to a neighbor who insists that
priests cannot be justified in by
passing marriage. Frankly, he
still believes some of the old
stories about scandalous goings
on in convents, etc.
A. One of the many reasons
for clerical celibacy is the chal
lenge which this way of life pre
sents to the world. The Catholic
Church believes that a man of
God ca- be more devoted to the
service of God (as did St. Paul:
see I Corinthians 7:32-33) and of
souls if he dedicates himself to
tally to God. Such a life of “un
natural detachment troubles the
worldly. We admit that it is a
difficult choice, but onlv if man
believes only in his own nature
and hi: own will-power. The
priest takes literally the words
of Christ when He said: "And
everyone who has left house or
brothers, or sisters, o father, or
mother, or wife, or children, or
lands, for my name’s sake, shall
receive, a hundredfold
(Matthew 19:27-29) The candidate
for the priesthood has years of
training and his acceptance of
this condition for ordination in
dicates that he makes this sacri
fice for the glory of God and the
salvation of souls. Fanciful gos
sip ab »ut alleged scandals is
simply the frustrate, man's at
tempt to explain away the chal
lenge of the dedicated lives of
priests and sisters. He knows
that the Catholic Church has
great respect for the Sacrament
of Matrimony.
The American Myth
It is the opinion of Barbara
Ward, British Catholic econom
ist and publicist, that recent de
velopments in the American eco
conomic s y s
tem “amount
to s o ething
very close to a
e v o 1 ution.”
The fact that
this revolution,
this welcome
change for the
better in the
field of indus
trial relations,
is virt u a 11 y
unknown out
side the Unit­
ed States is attributed
by Miss Ward to the influ
ence of the “men of the l^eft” in
Europe.” Victims, she says, of
their own mythology, they hon
estly believe that the United
Stales is in the last stages of
monopoly capitalism, from which
it would seem to follow logical
ly that the American economic
system is w’orse today than it
was yesterday and will be even
worse tomorrow’.
The "men of the I^eft” are so
wedded to this belief, this thor
oughly outmoded myth, Miss
Ward complains in her latest
book. “Faith and Freedom,” that
they never even think of studying
the facts of American economic
life objectively and scientific
ally.
Barbara Ward’s sympathetic
analysis of the American eco
nomic system, her willingness
as a foreigner to give credit
where credit is due, will be mu
‘sic to the ears of the American
people. Her criticism of the Eu
ropean lz*ft will also meet with
a welcome response on this
side of the Atlantic. It is our
opinion, however, that we Amer
icans ourselves are at least part
ly to blame for this widespread
misunderstanding of our econom
ic system. To some extent at
least, we are victims of our own
mythology which, incidentally,
has played into the hands of
our ieftist critics in other parts
of the world and has served to
deepen their own misunderstand
ing our economic system.
Th« “Dangerous Freedom"
The American myth is the phil
osophy or the slogan of free
enterprise and rugged individ
ualism. It is analyzed rather
well by a native American au
thor, Bradford Smith, in a new
book entitled “A Dangerous
Freedom.” According to Mr.
Smith, the characteristic Amer
ican freedom is lhe "dangerous
freedom" of voluntary associa
tion which, he says, has been
used more successfully and ap
plied to a greater multitude of
objects in the United States than
in any other country in the
world. In other words, few' if
any other nations in the free
world arc more highly organized
than lhe United States.
Q. Is there an established feast
day for Blessed*Edmund Cam
pion?
A. December first is his feast
day. This brilliant graduate of
Oxford was honored in his stu
dent days by Queen Elizabeth,
but after his acceptance of the
Catholic Faith he had to go into
exile. Returning to England later
as a priest he was finally caught,
was condemned and executed
by order of the same queen.
Send questions to Father Ed
ward F. Healey, Inquiry Corner,
The Catholic Times, Box 636,
Columbus (16) Ohio.
Strangely enough, many Amer
icans are unwilling to admit this
obvious fact. On the contrary.
Mr. Smith continues, “we have
built up a myth about oursel
ves which is damaging our repu
tation abroad and limiting our
behavior at home. This myth is
that the United States is a cap
italist-materialist ii dividualist
culture in which the individual,
through the mechanism of a free
economy, devotes himself to the
piling up of material goods and
comforts as his sole end and aim
in life We are still thinking
of ourselves through outworn
slogans and habits of mind
shouting the old cries of free
enterprise when everyone
knows enterprise is no longer
free and has always depended
on governmental protection and
of free-wheeling individualism
—we know that no man is able
to live by and for himself or
could endure
sible.”
were pos-
Mr. Adolf Berle of Columbia
University makes the same point
in another recent book, "The
20th Century Capitalist Revolu
tion.” The American economic
system, Mr. Berle says, is con
siderably different from tha
caricature “which stalks the fin
ancial pages of many newspa
pers.” So it is indeed'.
Tim* for D»c*nt Burial
The moral of all this is that the
American economic system will
never be properly understood
until it is properly understood at
home. In other words, the mythol
ogy of the European Left will
never be abandoned until our
own mythology of exaggerated
individualism is discarded. The
former is buttressed and sup
ported by the latter, and the one
is no more revelant to our mod
ern problems than the other.
Karl Marx and Adam Smith have
both been dead for lo these
many years. The time has come to
give them a decent burial so that
we can all get on with the ser
ious business of economic life,
which bears little resemblance,
whether in Europe or the United
States, to their outmoded theor
ies.
We have done well to exer
cise the “dangerous freedom” of
association so extensively. For
behind it, in the words of Mr.
Smith, “lies the essentially mor
al idea that if men want to be
free, they must serve each other,
for no man is strong enough lo
be free by himself.” It is not
enough, however, to serve one
another within the narrow limits
of our own respective organiza
tions. Somehow, or other the
various organizations themselves
will have to find a way—an or
ganized and systematic way—of
cooperation with one another for
the mutual service of all our
people, for the service of the
common good. This is at once
our greatest problem and our
greatest opportunity.