Newspaper Page Text
lite Louisianian. | plDLIÖHKI) EVERY SATURDAY. Office 114 Caroxdelet street, " New Orleans Là. JJm. (i. lïROWJV, —Editor. fir I'kkms or Si iîs-. kiption: Ove Yf.af. su .Months ÎHCEE Months «r*rjl.t C opï. ...é2 5*1 t 30 t#- Circulars, Programme«, Genera I jlwiiiMS Cards, Posters, etc., etc., guar Wte 'l to sjive general satisfaction to all m iv wish to secure our services. IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS. COLOliBD men's letter to charles S umner. SUMNER'S REPLY. [ Iti ht Opposes General Grant and why be Supports Horace Grrelry. The followig correspondence lias I bkeu place between Hon. Charles I Sumner and the colored citizens of he United States:' ' Washington , July 11,187*2.. Sir—Wc, the undersigned citi I aus of color, regarding you arf the I unrest and best friend of our race, ]•! admiring your consistent course i the United States Senate and Elsewhere as the speciul advocate of I oar rights, and believing your I course at this critical juncture in Itbe period of our citizenship would Ibe free from personal feeling or ■partisan preiudice, have ventured I tu request your opinion as to what ■ action tbe colored voters of note I should take in the Presidentini con tost uow pending. The choice of "Wfmple is now narrowed down tu General Grant or Horace Greeley. I Your long acquaintance with both and your observation have enabled 1 yon to arrive at a correct couclu j to as to which of the candidates,' Ijtiilgiug from their antecedents as I tell ;is their present position wili } I :i elected, enforce tho requirements the Constitution and Laws re I specting our civil and political rights with the most heartfelt sym pathy and greatest vigor. We hope I sud trust you will favor us with »ach reply as will serve to enlighten I uar liiiuds upon this subject and impel our people to go forward in 'Jie right direction. Our confidence a your judgment is so firm that, in IT opinion, thousands of intelli pnt colored voters of the country N be guide« 1 , in their actio* by I jour statement and advice. Hop l®o to revive a reply soon, we have ^ ^nojr to be, with great respect, • 'ßr obedient servants, [it August,M. D„ JMSÜ»er, (Sr., John H. Smith, Edward Oruser, Win. A. Worraley,Wm. Wilson, r. W. Tompkins, John H. Brown, Henry Laoe^ W. H. Bell, J. L. N. Bowen, M. D., Jacob Dewitter, Samuel Proc tor, J. J. Ketchum, Charles N Thomas, Wm. H. Shorter, Henry H ill. Thurman J. Shadd, George D. Johnson, Chris. A. Fleetwood, Chas. F. Bruce, Darid Fisher, Jr., David King, Wm. Polkery. r ^ «Hon. Charles Ssïtifri _ V- *;. . j> SENATOR SI'MNER'S LETTER. Wa shi n g t on, êfxûé €9,1872. en and Fdl<no-Vifäeti» —, ave delayed answering your ntnuiuiiication of July llfli, which **» duly placed in wsj- hands by committee, it is not because ^proper course for joapeemed ,4oubtfal, but because I.vnshedto upon & and b.W ibte to T_ b y information whkSk time Binoe then I ^oniuch on bo& sides, but my tho appeal you make. It if T* ^ »friend of * EM to be assunA in your opinion I have hold a consist tent course in the Senate and else where, as tho special .advocate of your rights. That course, by the blessing of God, I ineon to hold. 1 know yonr infinite wrongs, and feel for them as though they were mj' own. You only do mo simple jus tice when you add a belief that my counsel, at this critical juncture of your citizenship, would be free from personal feeling and partisan prejudice. In answering your in quiries I can have no feeling ex cept for your good, which I most anxiously seek; nor can any preju dice of any kind be allowed to in terfere—the occasion is too solemn —and especially is there no room for personal feeling or for partisan prejudice. no max or pal'.ty <!*n expect power except for general welfare, therefore they must be brought to the standard of truth, that they may be seen in life and act Von are right in saying that the choice for the Presidency is now narrowed down to President Grant or Horace Greeley. One of these is to be taken, and assaming my acquaintance with both and my ob servation of their livep, you invite my judgment bStvrecn them, asking me especially which of tin two, judging from their antecedents, as well as present position, would en force the constitution and laws, your civil and political rights, with the most heartfelt .sympathy and greatest vigor. Here I remark that in this inquiry you naturally put your rights in the foreground. So do 1; believing most «sincerely that the best interests of the whole coun try are associated with the completest recognition of-your rights* so that the two race-s shsll together in unbroken harmony. I also remark that you call atten tention to two things, the antece dents of the two candidates* and secondly, their present position. You wish to know from these which gives assurance of the most heart felt sympathy and greatest vigor in the maintainance of your rights; in other words, which, judging from the past, will be your truest friend? Tke communication with which you have honored me, is not alone. Colored fellow-citizens in other parts of the country, I may say in nearly every State of the Union, have made similar requests, and some complain that I havo thus far kept silent. 1 am not insensible to this appeal; but if my opinion is given, i* must be candidly, according to my con science. In this spirit I answer your inquiries, beginning with tbe antecedents OS WS two can sdub. Horace Greeley was born to pov erty, and educated himself in a printing office. President Grant, fortunate in early patronage, became a cadet at webt point, and w«w eduj catedat the public expense. Otté ntftrtftfl with nothing but industry and a character; the other started with a military commission. One was tre«ed »as civilian; the other as a soldier. Horace Greeley stood forth as a reformer and abolitionist President Grant enlisted as a pro slavery Democrat, and at the dec* tionof James Buchanan, fortified by his vote all pretensions of fia«* ry. i ncluding the Sn| fioott deci sion. Horace Greeley, from -flwtfr life, was eartHSt ^rf«^ opôÉtasit against slavery, full ? with the colored niéè, and foremost in the great battle for öunr his. President Gn^t, exéept as war, never did an; (iflfiiTft slavery, nor has he : at r anjr tima showa any sympathy vrigyhb Horace GmÛÔL earttist^f danrti that our eohm féRow -âtiaen* dxould vote, and "" nààaA Graut «as but Preeideßi on % to of human rights; always r»dy "for — JLI 'l." .* * 1 - : f, » ■ ;,;v. -, ; any good catwe, and never deterred by opposition or reproach* #s when for long years he |>efriouded your people,,, AiU tH-il#§§i4l^ ? qpaiH^i contiguous in hi» life, hi& industry, whichleaye§ <§01 withoç*Mte knowledge and açquai^tai^^ ^itb history, the instinct and^grasp of statesmanship, an au|iab]f natuie a magnanimous sonl, And above all an honesty which no suspicion has touched, and you have a bri jf por traiture. These are the , antecedents of horace clleelkv. Few of these things appear in, the President. His great success in war and the honor he has won can not change the record of his conduct toward your people, especially in contrast with the life-time fidelity of his competitor; while there are unhappy antecedents showing^ that in the prosecution of his plans he cares nothing for the colored race. The story is painful, but it must be told. I refer to the outrage he perpetrated upon Hayti, with its eight hundred thousand blacks en gaged in the great expriment of self-government. Here is a most in structive antecedent, revealing be yond question his true nature, and which is attested by documentary evidence. Conceiving the idea of ANNEXING DOMINICA, which is the Spanish part of the island, and shrinking at nothing, he began by seizing the Government war powers, in flagrant violation of tke Constitution, and then, at a great expenditure of money, sent several armed 'ships of the navy. In* eluding monitors, to maintain the usurper Baez in power, that through him he might obtain ^ 4 - the coveted prize. Not content with this audacious dictatorship, ho proceeded to strike at the independence of the black re public in au open menace of war, and all without the sanction of Con gress, to. which ia committed the war-making power. Sailing into the harbor of Port-au-Prince with our most powerful monitor, the Dictator—prttperly named for this service—also the frigate Severn, as consort, and other monitors in their train, the Admiral, acting under in structions from Washington, pro ceeded to the executive mansion ac companied by tho officers of his squadron, and then pointing to the great war ships in sight from the windows* dealt his menance of war threatening to pink or capture the Haytien ships. The President was black, not whiteu The Admiral wonddi have done ao such thing to any white ruler, nor would our eosntry have tolerated such a men ance from any government in the world. Here was an indignity not only to a black republic with its population of eight hundred thous and, but to the aebican bace evebvwheee, and especially in our own country. Nor did it^end here. From this on the navy of the United States was hovering on the coast k eeping that insulted people in constant anxiety, while President Grant was to them like a hawk sailing in the air, and ready to swoop lipon üs prey. This h^a$tlesa, cruel proceeding found a rictim among oiu: white fellow-citi Au excellent merchant of Connecticut; praised by all who knew him, was plunged into prison by Baéz, where he was immured it was feared he would write against the treaty annexation, aad Uw c.pti.itjr w« prolonged with the contrivance of two agents of the President—one of whmnis toi id constantly with him, and is part of the military ring immedi ahonfc feinst That such an shows Mlneveruttànda ^«M^oppositionto r «lÀwatiou vnui'tè -rJtm h r some timo my served, in white ■Haglnthaaetbaigs, •j.torf opinions were Unknown, It was only when I saw, the hmuch gE all law, w human and divine, that I was aroused, and then began the anger of the Preside^t^nd hi8 rings, mili tary and Sexi^ria 1 . Devoted to thes African, r-icc^ I felt for theui, be side being iiuml^d» ^>is jgreat Re public, acting thjroggh its President could set suc|u.a% exai^plc^ where the national -.constitution, .interna tional law and humanity Were" all sacrißced. Especially was. I moved when I saw the indignity to the colored race which was accomplished by trampling upon the fundamental principles of international law de claring the e luality of the nations, as our DKCLABVriON OF INDEPENDENCE . déclarés the equality of men. This terrible transaction, . which nobody can defend, is among the anteced ents of President Grant, by which you can judge how much the col ored race can rely upon his heart felt sympathies. Nor can it be for gotten that shortly after tbe return of the commission from this island Hon. Fred. Douglass, colored ora tor, accomplished in manners as in eloquence, was thrust awny from the company of the commissioners at a common table of the mail pack et on the Potomac, almost within sight of the Executive mansion, sim ply on account of his color. But the President, at whose invitation he joined the Commission, NEVER UTTERED A WORD in condemnation of, this exclusion; and when entertaining the returned commissioners at dinner, carefully omitted Douglass, who was in Wash inntom at the time, and thus repeat the indignity. s Other things might & mentioned, as showing the sym pathy of t|iePresident, but I cannot forgot the Civil Rights bill, which is the cap-stone of that equality beforr the law to which all are entitled, without distinction of color. Pres ident Grant, who could lobby so assiduously for his S Aii" DOMINGO SCHEME, fell wrong to the colored race, could do nothing for this beneficient mea sure. During the long session of Congress it was constantly discussed and the colored people everywhere hung upon the debate; but therj was no heartfelt sympathy from the President At last, just before the nominating convention, he address ed a letter to a meeting of colored fellow-ciizens in Washington, called to advance this cause, where he avoided the question by declaring himself- m favor of the exercise of those rights to which every citizen ia entitled, leaving it uncertain whether the colored people are just ly entitled to the rights secured by the pending bill. I understand that Mr. Greeley has been already assail ed by an impracticable Democrat as being friendlyto this bill, but no body lisped against President Grant on this aocount Among tbe antecedent I deem it my duty to menjtion, is the capacity of industry of thç, President in pro tecting the colored people and as suring peace àî the south. Nobody can doubt that a small portion of the eftort and earnest will, even without the lobbying so freely given to the Sou Domingo scheme, would have averted those ku-klux outrages which we deplore; so that thcte wotdd hove been no pretense for farther legislation by But ha was disabled, both by the eharcter and the draw back of his own conduct efter viola ting the constitution and intexnar tional teWj, te insult the black re public; and setting an example of mrabordhuHSon he m» not in a condition to rebuke the law-break ers. - Second—Passtog trwn -antece dents, I aime up w- 'to the present fositiaiioi^b' JssM ? f «IM '* r; - TŒ TWO CSUtMl>A*S8, Whieh is the subject of your next giqmry. If in any fc tfiftm p e a r tieul aro .-J*»." iç wift' was nominated by Itépublican Conven tions, one at Cincinnati and the oth at Philadelphia. In this respect they may seem to be on an equality, but iE will not fini to be observed that the contention at Cincinnati was composed of able and acknow ledged Republicans, inany of whom bavé acted with the party from its first formation, and who, without previous organization, came together voluntarily for the sake of reform and "purity in the government, whi|g. on tbe other hand the convention at Philadelphia was composed of delegates chosen largely under the influence of office-holders who assembled to sustain what is known as Grantism, being the per sonal government and pretensions of President Grant, involving ne potism, repayment of gifts by offi cial patronage, neglect of public duty, absenteeism, military rule, disregard of the constitution a? A laws, with general unfitness, and dignity to the colored race, all of which is so unrepublicnn as to make his support impossible by true Republicans; therefore the Conven tion held at Cincinnati. The two platforms, so far as concerns espe cially the colored race, all alike in substance, but that of Cincinnati is expressed in terms of the most worth of equal right?. It states and claims that we recog nize the equality of all men before the law, and holds that it is the duty of the Government in its dealings with the people to mete out equal and exact justice to all, of whatever nativity, race, color or persuasion, religious or political. In other re spects the Cincinnati platform is the most Republican, inasmuch as it sots itself against those unrepub lican abuses which have been nursed by the President into pernicious ac tivity. From the two nominations and the two platforms, I come to the supporters of the candidates. And here I look first at those immedi ately about them, and secondly at the popular support behind. Hor ace Greeley has among his imme diate supporters, in all parts of tho country, devoted and consistent republicans, always earnest for reform and pu rity in the governn^ent, and upon whose lives there is no shadow of suspicion, being a contrast in the character of those rings which play such a part in the present adminis tration. The country know» -too well of the military ring, through which the President acts. Such supporters are a very poor recom mendation. Looking at tbe popu lar support, the advantage is still with Horace Greeley. President Grant has at his bank a diversified army of office-holders, drilled to obey the word of command. All speeches praising him are by office holders and members of tbe rings. Horace Greeley finds Hocking to his support large numbers of Re publicans unwilling to continue the existing misrule and as «lies with them; a regenerated party, which comes forward to unite in the -lab? era! movement The Democrats in joining Horace Greeley havecbangéd simply as President Grant changed when ho joined the Republicans, except that he was rewarded at onoe with high office. The change is open, adopting the Republican •platform, which places equal rights of all under a safeguard of irréver sible guarantees, and at the same time accepting the nomination of a lifelong Abolitionist who represents pre-eminently the sentiment of duty to thecoloéed race. They have set tiiéir corporate seal to the sacred covenant They may continue De mocrats in name , but t hey are in reality B^ubHcwasCT^ ^the same' title th&fnbse blica»s|or ing jfcothe original rignificatiaa of wo rd d e dic ate d fc*toe - - BSMRti or «te üoftaüMM Hic «Bato aij üt lowwflwfr tiüt nated. him are less Republicans bè """"" the Democrats tmito #ith cause theni in support of cherished prin ciples and the candidate who repré sentethem. Conversions at-e always welcome, and not less so because the change is iti the multitude* other than an individual. A political par ty cannot if it would, and should not if it could, shut thé door against converts, whether converted by the score, hundreds or thousands. So we find that the supporter's of Pre stSèk Grant adSmt^ sail triumph the adhesion of a single Democratic politician, or a singh Democratic newspaper; with equa] reason and with higher pride may supporters of Horace Greeley an nounce the adhesion of one who, turning from things that arc behind the presses on to those that are be fore. It is also idle to say that the election of Horacc Greeley as Presi dent with Gratz Brown as Vice President, will be the return of the Democratic party to power. On the contrary, it will be an'iUaugura tion of REPUBLICAN PRINCIPLED, under the safeguard of a Republican President and Republican Vice President, with Democïîts as avowed supporters. In the organ ization of his administration and in the conduct of affairs, Horace Gree ley will naturally lean upon those who represent best the great pro mises made of equal rights and re conciliation at Cincinnati. If Dem ocrats are taken, it will be as Re publicans in heart, recognizing the associate terms of settlement as an irreversible finality. The hardi hood of political falsehood reaches its extreme point when it is asserted that under Horace Greeley the freedmen will be enslaved, or that the colored people will in any way suffer in their equal rights. -On the contrary, they will have in his elec tion not only the promises made in the Cincinnati platform, but nlso a splendid example for a full genera tion during which tie has never wavered in his assertion of his rights. To suppose that Horace Greeley, when placed where he can do them most good, will depart from the rule of his honest life is insult to reason. It is none the less idle to suppose that Democrats supporting Horace Greeley expect or desire that he should depart from those principles which are the gloiy of his character. They have accepted the Cincinnati platform, with its two-fold promises, and intend in good faith to maintain it Democrats cannçt turn back who at 'the Convention, adopting this platform, sang Greeley songs to the tune of "Old John Brown, his soul is marching on." Seeking es pecially an establishment of charac ter in the national government, they will expect their President to be al ways ..bue to himself, therefore I put aside partisan allegations that Greeley has gone to the Democrats, or that he will be controlled by Democrats. Each is without found ation or reason. According to my judgment they are attempts to avoid what you recognizo as the .true issue, being a question between the two candidates, or perhaps they may be regarded as scare-crows, to deter the timid. Nobody who votes for Horace Greeley will go to the Dem ocrats; nor do I believe that when elected Horace Greeley Will be un der any influance except that of m .. .,*ür ;TA- : enlightened conscience, which will keep him ever true to the in thus bim^H bea«»oökte$ àtffîi Gentlemen, in thus answering your two inquiries, ! have shown why you, as colored fellow-citizens, and also all who would uphold your rights and save tlte cölofod tiftcio from indignity; skoiuld ttefnse to sanction theTO^ectionéfPreeident Griät and^yoifr fnwt m % Öreefey: x I ouglit to idS that mk have known fcryeart * #! AboMôittt' - HKo r. • • -i.e. .*.■>•5" : « goveynmentan unswerving devotion to (»VfsteWl by dictation jo % sdettofial préjudice. Bésiâës* hll tiiisj which may fitly guide you in determining between tne two candidates, Tt ifly «tïiy to United SUites^jw^a part of tho country; fdûr welfare is indissoltcbly associated witfi that of the whole country, whew ali= »re prosperous and free, will Be*pitiers. Therefore, while justly carefuf of your own rights, yöu eannotV I» inherent to' the blessing OF GOVERNMENT. It is for you to consider whether the time has not cojneior something better than Sewafd, and whethcr characters like Horace Greeley do not give stronger assurance of good government than can be found in the insulter of tho colored race, al ready famous from the rings about about him, and his plain inaptitude for civil life. The supporters of President Grant compel us to observe his of fences and shortcomings. Their challenge to comparison cannot bo declined. It will be for others in the present canvass to hold itbeforo tiio American people. Speaking now for myself, I have to say that ■ my vote will be given for Horace Gree ley; but in giving it I do not go to the Democratic party,' nor am I any less a Republican. On the contra ry, I am so much a Republican that I cannot support a candidate whoso conduct in civil life has shown inca pacity to appreciate Republican principles,-and whose âdininjstiation has been marked by acts of delin quincy, especially toward the bolor od rac^ by the side of which the alle DESEBVE3 IMPEACHMENT for higher crime and misdemeanors, rather than a reno min ation ; and on trial it would have been enough to exhibit his seizure of the war pow er and his indignity to a, black Re public, with its population of eight hundred thousand, in violation of National Constitution and of inter national law. And here a contrast arises between him and Abraham Lincoln. The latter, in his first an nual message^ recommended a rec ognition of what he called the inde but it is at these that President Grant has struck. One of Abraha m Lincoln's first ac|s was to put tho black republic ob equality tritt» oth er powers; one of President Grant'» acts to degrade it. I am such a Republican tha t I wish to see in the Presidential chair a lifetime Abolitionist I wish tho President sincerely devoted to civil service reform, bigining with tho one-term principle, which General Grant once accepted but now din owns, I also wish a President who sets an example of industry and unselfish dedication to tho public good; and I wish to see a President through Whorii wo may expect' peace and harmony, instead of dis cord. ' President Grfcntfsafetas to. delight in strife. If ho finds hp enemy be fallu Upon his friend^ as when ho struck at tho Black Republic, insulted Russia in hi$ annual message, of fended both France and Germany, and then in personal relations quar reled generally. My own personal experience teaches how futile is tho chaige that whek Horace Geeéley receives Democratic votes therefore ho becomes a Deniitxärät Or lapses into Democratic control I wish the first choice to the Senate by tiio coalition of > - af» FKEE-SOLWKKS AND DiXOOftkXS. •t- Den^era^o y^ l^po^n^kes moaSe^ter feun igfsp^atts, m* ac bliis'I vd - p gggegsBSBSB , j ~■ rr■ ;•—li— »? Wegw " .!3.Aa IL- JIUÜMIL . U > *#3-% ^Hl4 M fW Bgati sa»»'.* »»» XAi« ï-il-i i*i l.Ux £& i- ÄiiiMi. fetî XHi sabre I êiî .. . & «d T* cri Ä », • ■ fi-» m"' <Î Jt-î > ,,,y v GSstr^pry Wti tkçsmip "wm m JDK J;? fâffî : ?J . lasÄSrztKKitfS • 'i ^ , wn*œmtw4i fa*tmh im* Srnfatt] —— '•- %£ .Ofe •*« ' -- ^ s • ase •r~^ I -, ;?- ■: ; i±m . VOLUME 2. "KEPUBLICA N-VA<!T V> ALL TIMES, AND üXDKIt ALL CI HC IT M STAN" CES." g ^ggMâjjjfa ■■•■■- ■ ■ ■ .,- - . g - fa 1 NRW, OHLE AN S, Iff AyA, JÄT ÜB DAY, AUGUST * 10, 1 £' r 2. :; 5 éàim NUMBERS*, —