Newspaper Page Text
6 THE NE6RO QUESTION. _ I Letter from Gen. Cox Eepubli can Candidate for Gov ernor of Ohio. He Advocate* ,l « Peaceable Sep»ra« j lion of the Race* on the Soil where they now are »» i Suffrage to Negroes no Remedy j for- Existing Evils. < , ( 1 Oberlin, July 24, 1865. 1 Gen, J. D. Cox: , Dkab Si is : Thefpeople of this place, with < entire unanimity, sought your nomination for i Governor of Ohio. With equal unanimity we , desire to promote your election. * * * ( We want to know directly from you your ( views on the following subjects: Ist. Are you < in favor of modifying our Constitution so as to give the elective franchise to colored men ? , 2d In the reorganization of the : Southern ( States should the elective franchise be secured , to the colored people ? * * * * < Very truly and sincerely yours, 1 y y e. h. Fairchild, », SAMUEL PLUMB. s Committee. j Gentlemen: Your letter of yesterday, in- J Suiring what are my opinions upon some of . le phases of the question of the reconstruct .• tion of the Union, was received this morning. . **** * * • J I presume we shall agree in regard to four general principles asserted in the Faneuil Hall 1 address, as these which should guide the de termination of our relations with both whites J and blacks in the rebel States. That there may be no mistake in reference to this, I | quote them: i “First—The principle must be put beyond all question, that the republic has a direct ! claim upon the allegiance of every citizen from which no State can absolve him, and to his obedience to the laws of the republic, anything ] in the Constitution or laws of any State to the ' contrary notwithstanding. Second—The public faith is pledged to every person of color in the rebel States, to secure to them and their posterity forever, a com plete and vertlble freedom. Having* provided them this freedom, secured their aid on the faith of this promise, and by a successful war and actual military occupation of the country, having obtained the power to secure the result, we are dishonored if we fail to .make It good to them. Third—Th system of slavery must be abol ished and prohibited by paramount and irre versible law. Throughout the rebel States there must be, in the words of Webster, “ im pressed upon the soil itself an inability to bear up but free men.” Fourth—The system oi the States must be truly republlban. The application nlade of the last principle in the address I do not regard as sound, but I shall perhaps agree mere fully with you than you do < with the address, when I assert that in a re publican community political privileges of any kind can never be rightly or safely based upon hereditary caste. How then, it will naturally be asked, can there be any practical difference between us as to the mode of carrying out these princi ples ? It is found hi the views we take of the mutual relations of the two races in the South. You, judging from this distance, say, “Deliver the four millions oftfreed people into the hands of their former oppressors, now embittered bv their defeat, and they will make their condi tion worse than before.” I, starting from the same principles, and alter four years close aqd thoughtful observation of the races where they are, say I am unwillingly forced to the convic tion that the effect of the war has not been sim ply to “ embitter ” their relations, but to de velop a rooted antagonism which makes their permanent fusion in one political community an absolute impossibility. The sole difference between us then is in the degree of hostility we find existing bet weenie races, and its proba ble permanence. You assume that the exten sion of the right of suffrage to the blacks, leav ing them intermixed with the whites, will cure all the trouble. I believe that it would rather be like the decisions in that outer darkness of which Milton speaks, where “ Chaos empire sits, And by decision more Embroils the fray.” Yet as I believe, with you, that the right of life and liberty are inalienable, and more than admit the danger of leaving a laboring class at the mercy of those who formerly owned them as slaves, you will 6ay lam bound to furnish some solution of the problem which shall not deny the right or incur the peril. So I am, and the only real solution which I can see is the peaceful separation of the races. But, you will reply, foreign colonization will break down hopeleesly under the very vastness of the labor, even if it were not tyrannical enongh to expel theA unfortunate people from the land of their birth. I grant the full weight of the objection, and therefore say the solution is narrowed down to a peaceable separation of the races on tbe soil where they now are. The essential point in the discussion thus ap pears to be the actual relations of the two races in tbe Southern States question of fact, and the probable future consequences of those re lations as a question of theory. Upon the question of fact I think I may with all modesty claim that my antecedents and my opportunities for observation entitle my testi mony to have some weight, even with the most radical anti slavery men in the North. The antagonism of which I have sppken is not entirely one-sided. On the part of the for mer master it takes the form of an indomitable !' n de, which utterly refuses to entertain the idea oi political or social equality, mingled with a hatred intensified by the circumstances and the results ot the war. This feeling is not con fined to the slave-owners alone, but the poor whites share it fully, and often show It more passionately. . On the part oi the lreedmen, it is manitested in an uuor distrust of the dominant race, and an enmin which, although made by circum stances more passive and less openly manifest led, is as real and implacable as the other. They have the mutual attraction of race among themselves, and repulsion of the other people developed to a degree which sur prised me. It is not as individuals of “nation common to us all that they speak of them selves, but, to use the language ofoneoftbem speaking to myself, they feel that thev ‘‘have long been an oppressed and down-trodden people." The daily and hourly repetition of proofs of this fact, many of them too subtle for descrin tion, but none the less convincing to the < v server, has fully convinced me that never be tween Norman and Saxon, n6r between Gaul and Frank, was there a more conscious hatred or an antagonism more likely to prove invet erate than between black and white on our Sonthem soil. The negroes have no sense of security nor faith in their former masters, even if they offer them political rights; they will fear them as JJanaos dona ferenks. ***++. t * * , What does history teach us in regard to the permanence and durability of such prejudices and enmities of the race ? Speaking on this subject, Augustin Thierry says: “Whatever degree of territorial unity the great moderfc states of Europe may appear to have attained, whatever may be community of manners, lan guage and public feeling which the habit of living under the same government and in the 6fln»o state of civilization has introduced , the inhabitants of each of these states, there is scarcely one of them which does not even now present traces of the diversity of the rices of men which in coarse of time have come to gether in it. This variety shows itself under different aspects, with features more or lees marked. Sometimes it is a complete separa tion of idioms, of local traditions, of political sentiments, and a sort of instinctive enmity distinguishing from the great national mass the population of a few small districts; and some times a mere difference of dialect or even of accent, marks, though more feebly, the limit of tbe settlements of races of men, once thoroughly distinct and hostile to each other.” If fifteen centuries of common government and political anion have not been able to ob literate the distintiona and even the “ instinc tive enmity ” of races which were physically similar, what encouragement have we that suc cess will attend a forced political fusion of bit terly hostile races from the antipodes of the human family ? The process by which even the comparative nnity of the English people was achieved, is described by the same philosophic historian whom I have quoted, near the close of his great work, as a “complete amalgamation” of the Norman and Saxon idioms, and a “mixture of the two races,” which it took four centuries of sanguinary war to accomplish. Just stepping as we are from the battle-field on which the descendants of a common ances 3, so little removed from ns that we can Ute ly reach bock oar hands to grasp those of oar common dree, have waged the most terri ble and tremendous of modem wars, it does not become us to argue that peaceful discus sions will quietly settle differences which in former times were settled by the sword; bat the memory of the almost present, as well ns of the remote past, calls upon os to build our polity upon principles which experience as well as reason prove to be durable, and more than ever to avoid deluding ourselves with the cry of “peace, peace, when there is no peace. As, daring those weary years of war, I have pondered this problem in the intervals of strife or by the camp fire at night, I have been more and more impelled to the belief that the only basis of permanent nationality is to be found in complete homogenity of people, of manners and of laws. The rapid fusion of the races of Western Europe, as they have met upon our shores, has secured the former of these requi sites, and tiie Yankee race (I adopt the epithet as an honorable one) marked as It is with sali ent characteristics, is so complete an amalga mation of all families from the eastern bound ary of Germany to the western coast of Ire land, that there are few of us in whose veins are cot mixed the blood of several. But this unhappy race of which we are speaking does not amalgamate with the rest It is entirely immaterial to discuss why it is so; the fact no one can deny; nor can it be denied that its sal vation or its destruction will surely be worked out in its family isolation. Because there could be no real unity of peo ple between the southern white and the south ern blacks, it seems manifest to me that there could be no political nnity, bat rather a strife for the mastery, in which the one or the other would go to the wall The struggle for supremacy would be direct and immediate, and I see no hope whatever that the weaker race should not be raced to hopeless subjection, or utterly d«nd. There is no reason to suppose that Sfaßri border ruffianism could never be repeated on new fields, and the strife once inaugurated the merciless war would continue as long as the obnoxious race had an existence. You have expressed your anticipation of such a result in one state of the case, how is it that you do not see that a direct straggle for power at the bal lot-boWwould make the contest more deadly ? I hold that there is great philosophic truth in the words of Guizot, in summing up the eight centuries of bloodshed out of which the French emerged into nationality from the pet ty races and tribes. He 6ays: “In the Kfe of nations, that union which is exterior and visi ble, the unity of name and of government, ab though important, is by no means the first in importance, the most real, or that which makes indeed one nation. There is a unity which is deeper and more powerful: -it is that which results not merely from identity of gov ernment and of destiny, but from the homoge nity of social elements, from the likeness of institutions, of manners, of ideas, of tastes, of tongues; the unity which resided in the men themselves when society assembles, and not in the foims of their associations ; in short, that moral unity (f unite morale ) which is far more important than political unity, and which is the only solid foundation for the latter.” I have watched with deep interest the edu cational effect of the war upon our own army, and I assure you that whilst our white soldiers have uniformly and quickly learned to appre ciate the fact that the existence of our free government could only be preserved by the destruction of the system of slavery, and so became radically and thoroughly anti-slavery, the tendency of battling for the old fl tg was almost equally uniform in increasing and deep ening their pride of race. The fact is one which cannot safely be overlooked in any cal eolation involving their action upon the polit ical problems before tbe country, and it is one in regard to which I th’nk I can hardly be mis taken. The details of any system of separation could only be determined by careful study and a wide comparison of viqws. Suppose, how ever, that without breaking up the organiza tion of any State, you take contiguous territo ry in South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama and Florida, and there, under the sovereignty of the United States, and with all the facilities which the power and wealth of the govern ment can give, we organize the freed men in a dependency of the Union analagous to the western territories. Give them schools, laws facilitating the acquirement of homesteads, to be paid for by their Qwn labor, full and exclu sive political privileges, aided at the start, should it seem necessary, by wise selections from the largest brains and most philanthropic hearts among anti-slavery men, to join them, a judiciary or executive which would command their confidence in the first essays of political existence. There need be no eoereive collection of the colored race in the designated region; the ma jority are there now, and the reward of politi cal power would draw thither the remainder quite as rapidly as their place could be sup. plied by white immigration into other States. The forts and seaport cities could remain un der the direct control of the Federal Govern ment as the basis for that common trade and intercourse with the oth«r parts ol the country and the world which would be necessary. The fullest opportunity to develop the highest civ ilization they are capable of would then be given. Colored men of talent and intelligence would not then make vain struggles for the empty name of being lawyers without briefs, or merchants Without trade, but would have what a leading journal of the east has fre quently demanded for them, tbe opportunity, as well as the right, to rank according to their real character and ability, i That there are difficulties in the realization - of such a plan I shall be tbe first to admit, but i there are difficulties in all plans. It is natural to man to straggle to avoid responsibly, and ' • to drift upon the current, trusting to fate, bat , drifting also leads to difficulties, as we who I into a war, which has cost half a million of lives and untold millions of money should , to be told; and I agree with yon that , drifting win probably decide this matter - against the black race, and involve his destruc ! i ,u° n i. w *\d e b y leaving the labor of the South in - 1 hand s of a degraded caste it entails upon ■ me country the worst material effects of slavery and prevents homogenity of institutions and 1 Sooth, which I have said f LSS p£5 lhe onl - v Bure foundation of per- I SasSS BB £ r few colored mra bnUSSSm 2y THE WEEKLY- PIONEER* AND DEMOCRAT. be regarded as the walfr and strays of the mat body whfch is a nation in numbers, and m its isolation by mental and physical characteris tics It is as a unit that we must deal with them, and no paltering with the edges of the difficulty which will avert the doom which all history teaches us will follow a wrong solu tion. i I have approached the subject of ou anti slavery man. I nave thought as deeply as I was capable of, and have carefully revised mv opinions and tested them by all the fundamen tal principles of right and justice. If others do not agree with me, and it part me from any whose principles and motives are the same as my own, my deep regret that it should be so cannot change mv convictions. * * * * * * Very respectfully, your obedient servant, J. D. COX. Messrs. E. H. Fairchild, Samuel Plumb, com mittee, &c., Oberlin, Ohio. V SCANDAL AT DETROIT. How a Fast Man Negleoted to Close the Blinds. Mai’s Perfidy aid Woman’s Trust. From the Detroit Tribune, July Si. When we look back upon the many scan. mag. eases that have been brought to light in this city daring several months past, we find that Saginaw has had a full share. Notwithstanding this, however, we find that the land of salt is apparently not oontent, and now famishes another still more scandalous than may similar transaction, the particulars of which will be found below, as obtained from an appa rently reliable source. Several days ago George Carter left his wife and family at Saginaw and came to this city with a woman of bad character. They pnt up at the Garrison House, where they registered themselves as man and wife, and enjoyed themselves seeing the sights, visiting plaoes of amusement, etc. On Saturday, Mrs. Carter—a lady of cul tivation and refinement—arrived here in pursuit of her liege lord, and made the matter known to the police. Carter was easily found, hut it was thought best to make a sure thing of his crime before making the arrest An officer was de tailed to watob, and Carter was followed from the circus to the hotel above named. The guilty pair oconpied a front room, and as they did not take the precaution to close the blinds when they retired, their movements were easily discernible from tbe street * . • After the pair had been snugly ensconced in bed about an hour, a fearless baud of policemen ascended the stairs, and noise lessly placing a table in front of the bed room door, a view was had of the interior of the apartment, into which a lurid glare was thrown from a lantern. The reflec tions of the light upon Carter’s face awoke him, and about tbe time he commenced to make inquiries relative to the intrusion, he and the woman were in custody. A trip on foot to tbe lock-up was made, and Car ter and his paramour furnished with sepa rate apartments for the night. On Sunday morning Carter had an in terview with Lis wife, and promised faith , folly that be would reform, go home, and behave himself properly in future. Un der the circumstances Mrs. 0 agreed to let him off, and* he was discharged with the expectation that he would leave for Saginaw to-day. Instead of doing so, however, it has been ascertained that this morning he had paid his bill at the Garri son House and left the city with the woman he came here with, going no ope knows where. Seduction and Robbery. Fr ra tbe Cincimatl C'.mmercial, August 1. A wholesale grocery merchant of Saint Louis arrived here last Friday, and called at the Barnet House, where he made anx ious inquiry of Mr. Wilkinson as to wheth er the name of George W. Ashcraft “ and lady ” had been registered there. Being informed in the negative, he left, the 6ame day, for New York, in quest of the parties. Upon this case hangs a tale. It appears that the George W. Ashcraft referred to had been in the employ, as book-keeper, of the gentleman who is now making such a vigo oue search for him. His employer has a ‘laughter of eighteen, a beautiful girl, who had become enaqiored of the said book-keeper, who is said to be a young man oi fascinating address, remarkably good lookir.g, and evidently unscrupulous character. Discovering bis advantage, Ashcraft immediately followed it up, to the shame of the unfortunate girl, who readily yielded herself to his wishes. While their peculiar intimacy was yet a secret, known only to themselves, Ash craft, fearful of the consequences, pro posed to her father for her hiand in mar riage. The father refused his consent, which would certainly have been granted had he known the real state of affairs; but neither of the guilty parties had the cour age to inform the parents, and the result was, that the weak, yielding girl, fearful of their anger, and dreading the shame she would have to encounter upon expo sure, and still dinging with all the fervor of the love of her passionate nature, to her guilty companion, consented to leave the city with him. Upon the night of their departure, she penned and directed to her mother a short note, vaguely hinting at . the facts of her misfortune, while the 1 book-keeper appropriated to himself the sum of $1,500, which he had placed in his blank-book, as if for a deposit, As soon as he could ascertain the direction in i which the fugitives had started, the grief i stricken father left his home in pursuit ol | them, with the determination ol overtak ing them. The Battle of Waterloo. The London limes recently published the following: At Waterloo the disturber of the world’s I peace was punished, but that is all. Tbe ideas which he represented survived; the dynasty which he founded rose again, and the rains on ! which his throne had been raised it was found beyond our power to reconstruct Under such j circumstances, we think the celebration ot I Waterloo might as well be discontinued. INTE NTI O N ALT) uPLI CATE EXPOSURE MOBBY, THE PIRTIBIN LEADER. HIS PERBONAL ADVENTURES —X —— HOW HE BADGERED BURNSIDE. RUrnond Correspondence Philadelphia Inquirer The famous guerilla chief was visible on the streets of Richmond yesterday. Some body has described Mosby as a handsome man in personal appearanoe, but he is no thing of the sort Of erdinary height, his build is good enough, bat his face is very oommonplaoe, and his light brown hair, worn nnkempt, adds nothing to its attractiveness. Mosby’s features and ex pression would impress you as those of a man reselute and canning, not captiously honest nor viciously cruel, and I suspect that in tbe stories of his cruelty he has been somewhat belied. His business in Richmond is to regain possession of some tobacco he claims, and I was sorry to hear him remark that it is all that he has in the world, for I know he will not geffty, and he owes the Inquirer for a horse aid divers other articles, taken from me by Arne of his band last summer, and I imagine our chance for restitution to be small. In another sense it was pleasant to hear him admit his poverty, for if he told the troth, it shows that he was griev ously swindled at the final divirion of tbe spoils on the breaking up of his command, and further, it oontroverte the uncomfort able axiom concerning honor among thieves. . When the life of John Singleton Moehy comes to be written, it will show a suc cession of startling personal adventure un surpassed by those of any partisan chief on record. That Mosby was always hang ing on the outskirts of our armies, cutting off our trains, capturing our stragglers, and harraseing us in every possible way, the people generally know; hot they do not know that he went in and out of our camps at pleasure, and was never once de tected. . It is said (and an Joubtedly truly) that while Burnside lay opposite Freder icksburg, in the winter of 1862, Mosby dined with him in the character of a Union farmer from across the river, and gathered with his shrewd canning from the general table-talk, mnoh valuable information,with which he regained the rebel lines without molestation. One of the best things told of him oc curred that same winter and in the same neighborhood. Barnside that winter was literally badgered by Mosby. He seemed übiquitous, and at last it became danger ous to go from camp at all, as the least ramble was sure to result in capture by Mosby. At last Burnside became wearied oat, and determined to capture the parti san, and to this end sent detachments of cavalry to scour the country thoroughly, and bring him in dead or alive. One day, one of these detachments, led by a lieu tenant colonel, was going up the Dumfries road, when, from a house in sight of the Federal lines, a man emerged dressed in the uniform of a Federal captain, and at tended by one orderly dressed in our cav alry blue. At the gate were two horses marked U. S., and furnished with our reg ulation saddle and bridle, and mounting, the captain rode up and accosted the colo nel, who was still marching up the road. The colonel informed his new companion that he was in search of this Mosby, and asked if he had heard anything of him. The'Captain had heard and knew to a certainty that an hour before Mosby had been at Jones’, four miles up the road. isions of promotion and newspaper para graphs dancing before him, the Colonel ordered “trot march,” while the Captain with his orderly dashed across a field to a farm house to get some milk, he said, before returning to camp. Arrived at Jones’, the Colonel found that Mosby had indeed been there, bat also found that he had departed in the direction ot Burnside’s camps. . Back the Colonel beat in baste, making inquiries everywhere, but finding no trace.. Arrived again at the house from which the communicative Captain bad appeared, the woman aocosted him, and this colloquy ensued : Woman—“Kornel, who was that ere Yank Capting met ye hear as ye was gwine tother way ?” Colonel—“I don’t know his name, but he belonged to a Massachusetts regiment.” Woman—“ Yeas, well, kneow aint you sold ? that air was John Mosby. ” Colonel—“ H—l! ” And he rode back to camp and said nothing whatever about his morning’s work, except to report that he had -not captured him. Some of his men did, however, and that story floated about the army during the rest of the war. Many such things as this are told of Mosby. and his power for mischief was so sensibly felt in the Valley last summer and autumn, that Phil. Sheridan used to 6wear at him in his most hearty style. Mosby now is a citizen of the United States, no better and no worse than the thousands of other Virginians who hive laid down their arms The Third Regiment. A letter from our correspondent a Little Sock, dated July 24tb, says: Lieut. House starts for home the latter part of this week or first of next, with about eighty or a hundred men of the Third Regiment, mus tered out by reason of expiration of term of service. We have been living high on vegetables and fruit for some time. Berries of all kinds, ap ples, peaches, <fcc., »fcc., in large quantities are beginning to come into market, but the late wet spell has injured the crops very much, though the cotton is not so much damaged as com. wheat, &c. The Commissioner ot Pensions has de cided that, in accordance with the act of Congress, Claim Agents are prohibited, under severe penalty, from receiving more than ten dollars in all for their services in prosecuting any pension claim, or from re ceiving any part of such fee in advance, or any percentage of any claim, or of any portion thereof, for pension or bounty. Assignment of General Officers Who are to be Retained and Who mastered Oak A general order has been issned by the War Department, assigning the following genet al offioers as indicated below: To report for duty to General Hooker, com manding deportment of the east: Major Gens. D. E. Sickles, J. G. Parke, and Chas. Griffin, and Brigadier Generals Robert B. Potter, J. E. Robinson, Eli Long, and H. O. Barnaul. To report to General Hancock, commanding the middle department: Major General O. A Humphreys, and Brigadier Generals G. W. Getty, R. R. Ayres, W. H. Emory, A Baird, R. O. Tyler, and J. D. Fessenden. To report to General Augur, commanding the department of Washington: Brig. Gens. G. Mott, James Haskin, F. J. Dent, and Fran cis Fessenden. To report to General Ord, commanding the department of the Ohio: Major Generals John A Logan, and J. D. Cox, and Brigadier Gens. M. Leggett, O. B. Wilcox, B. Mclntosh, and Thomas G. Fitcher. To report to General Stonetnan, command ing the department of Tennessee: Maj. Gen. W. B. Hazen. and Brigadier Generals. J. M. Brennan, J. E. Smith, A. C. Gellem, and Ed ward Hatch. To report to General Parmer, commanding the department of Kentucky: Major General Gordon Granger, and Brigadier Generals J. C. Davis, J. F. Harteauft, J. 8. Brisbin, and J. F. Wade. To report to General Pope, commanding the department of the Missouri; Major Generals G. M. Dodge and F. P. Blair, jr., and Brigs, dier Generals F. Wheaton, J. M. Corse, Geo. Chapman, T. C. H. Smith, P. E. Connor, Ellis ton A. Bculiy, Charles Walcott, and W. B. El liott. To report to General Terry, commanding tbe department of Virginia; Major General John Gibbon, and Brigadier Generals J. B. Ricketts. W. N. Miles, A T. A Torbet, N. M. Curtis, J. W. Taruell, and H. S. Carroll. To report to General Schofield, commanding the department of North Carolina; Najor Gen erals George Crook and J. Kilpatrick, and Brigadier Generals T. IL Huger, and M. D. Haralng. To report to General Gillmore, commanding the Department of South Carolina; Brigadier Generals A. Ames, J. T. Croxton and Charles Devens. To report to General Steadman, commanding the department of Georgia; Major General J. H. Wilson, and Brigadier Generals H. King and J. D. Stevenson. To report to General Foster, commanding the department of Iowa: Brigadier Generals J. Newton and B. Alford. To report to General Slocum, commanding the department of Mississippi: Major General P. J. Osterhans, and Brigadier Generals M. F. Forse, Charles E. Wing and J. W. Davison. To report to General Wood, commanding the department of Alabama: Brigadier Gen erals B. H. Grierson, H. E. Davis and G. A Deßnssy. To report to General Can by, commanding the department of Louisiana: Brigadier Gen erals Doolittle and T. W. Incoman. To report to General Wright, commanding the department of Texas: Major Generals A. J. Smith, F. Steele, David L. Stanley, J. A. Mower, Wesley Merritt and G. A Custer and Brigadier Generals G. A Smith and A. Gibbs. To report to General Reynolds, commanding the department of Arkansas aod Indian Terri tory : Major General T. J. Wood and Brigadier Generals S. Williams, H. G. Hunt, E. O’Con nor and C. W Morgan. To report by letter for duty to General Mc- Dowell, commanding the department of Cali fornia ; Brigadier and Brevet Major General E. M. McCook. All of the officers now on duty in the milita ry division of the Pacific will remain on duty until relieved by proper orders. All other gen eral officers not named in this order, except those commanding colored troops, those on staff duty, and those specially detailed in or ders from the War Department, will be reliev ed without delay, and their names reported to the adjutant general of the army. Officers herein assigned, who are ou duty under special assignment of the War Department, will re port by letter to the department commanders, and also to the adjutant general, stating the nature of their present service, the number and date of the order. Thirty day’s leave of absence is granted to all general officers re lieved by this order, by order of Lieutenant Genera; Grant. The military ou the Subject of the Hecent Election* In Richmond. There was an election held in Richmond (Va.) the other day, which resulted in the choice of the inhabitants of that city to th municipal offices. The term of office of these recently elected incumbents proved unexpectedly briefj Major General Turner, by what authority does not yet fully appear, having issued the following order respecting the aforesaid election : Headquarters District ok Henrico.) Richmond, Va, Julv 28, 1865. f Special Order No. 72.] [extract.] Whereas, As satisfactory evidence has been furnished at these headquarters that, at the election held in the city of Richmond, on the 25th instant, for municipal officers, voters were excluded on account of having lost their residence by reason of their absence as soldiers in the United States army during the rebellion, when no 6uch ground was taken as against sol diers absent in the rebel army; and Whereas, With but few exceptions, all of the officers elected at said municipal election have been prominent and conspicuous in ori ginating and sustaining the rebellion; and Whereas, The issue was distinctly made, and openly avowed, at said election, as between these men who bad aided end abetted in the war against tlie United States authority, and those who had with their lives defended our country; There fort, Justice to the thousands who have fallen on the battle field or by disease, in their efforts to put down this rebeliiou, and to those who are now returning to their homes in this district, after four years of suffering, toil, privation, and dangers incurred in fighting treason, demands that those persons who were so lately contributing all their efforts to sustain treason and overthrow this government, should not be installed into office, and intrusted with power; hence. It is hereby declared, That the United States military authorities of this city will regard said municipal elections, held in this city on the 25th instant, as null and void, excepting onlv the election of clerk of the Hasting Court • and each and every person e ected to office, except fo£,f^ d , clerk of the Hustings Court, is pro hibited from exercising the duties appertain ing thereto. By command of Brevet Mnj. Gen. Terry, , E. LEWIS, A. A G. Goob Advice. — Win. Cullen Bryant gave the following excellent advice to a young man who offered him an article for the Evening Post : My young friend, I observe that you have used several French expressions in your article. I think if you will study tbe English language, that you will find it capable of expressing all the ideas you mav have. I have always found it so, and in all that 1 have written, I do not recall an iastance when I was tempted to use a foreign word, but tbat on searching I found a better one in my own language* Hutfor* n>r _ and her daughter EIU ™“ er » chopped to death fa hkj .i,^.°if the'lK)dießp re sented e T® r^ime » “d -aft S4OO in money whfoJ 'T- drawer with the knife 5? /T d m alarm and the own and his mother twu on , f re » betdfadfate^^ Gen. Grant S *TdK orrM,< * d * ~Ce Mql > «the New York «?J^» eVe ? Dg(Wed, “^ y) “hop night, a large crowd assembled in the hop room ’expecting to see “Gen. Grant dance.” Abont 9 o’clock the general and family entered tbe room, and the h*nd immediately struck np “Hail to the Chief,” thereby giving everybody present a chance to reoognize in tbe modest offioer wbo now entered the room the gallant and victorious leader of our armies daring tbe late contest in tbe field. Everybody knows, or should be aware of bis ability to lead armies, and use np armies, when they are not composed of men to. suit bis ideas of things; bat every body did not know that the general could dance. Well, now, sober-sides, don’t get shocked at what I am about to disclose— be can dance, and did dance on tbe eve ning of the 26th day of July, at West Point. It was amasing to see the general manenvre in the intricate movements of a cotillon; but he accomplished it manfully, and it most have been particularly delight ful for the young ladies to be handled in the dance by the gallant hero. Minnesota Politic*. We make the following extracts from a letter of our New York correspondent oonoerning the issues of the ensuing can vass in this State : I sec by the papers that the Minnesota Dem ocratic Convention is to come off on the 16th of next month. I trust that the convention will evince wisdom and true patriotism in the selection of its men. Remember nothing can defeat the Democratic party but Democrats themselves. The soldier’s vote at home will be verv differ ent from what it was in the field. They have returned weary and warworn, utterly sick of the negro, and they will not consent that the great interests which they so nobly fought and bled for should be put in jeopardy by a miserable faction, who taint the public air by keeping the corpse of slavery over ground, and rattle its bones in order to make political capi ta] for themselves. But I am most anxious to see what course the conservative Republicans of Minnesota,— such men as the Hon. James Smith, of St. Paul, and others.—will take now. Will they go in for Wendell Phillips, Chief Justice Chase (de should be called “ Chase Justice ’), and for enfranchising the negro ?—not in Minnesota, for that is of very little moment, but in the Southern States, against thq wish of their citi zens? If you do this, gentlemen,'you will strike at the keystone of the arch that'supports the whole structure of your republican form of government. Our correspondent will not get much satisfaction from the action of the conserv ative Republicans of this State. They are completely under the thumbs of the radi cals, and dare not wag their tongues, save in private, against any fanatical measures that are proposed. Coat of Message* by the Atlantic fable. Some idea oi the expense of European dis patches by the Atlantic Cable may be formed from the following extract from a communi cation to the editors and publishers of Western newspapers: At the rate of tariff established by tbe Atlan tic Telegraph Cable Company, forty words from London to New York will cost about S3OO. Tbe Executive Committee of the Associated Press have ordered me to arrange for two daily reports of not less than twenty words each, and so many more as the importance of the news may justify. These reports will be prepared at London and Liverpool, respectively, at about 3 o’clock p. m. and 3 o’clock a. m., or about 10 o’clock a. m. and 10 o’clock p. m.. New York time, so that the London report of 3 o’clock p. m. will probably arrive in good season for pub lication in the regular editions of the after noon journals, and the London report of three o’clock a. m. will doubtless arrive ia New York in good season for the publication of the morning journals. Two reports in every twenty-four hours for six days, anq one on Sunday, will cost $1,950 per week or $102,000 per year. Add for de tails of important news via Cape Race, Halifax, etc., for agencies, and incidental* in Europe, $15,000, tnje total cost per annum will be $117,- 000. Deduct the present European news ex penses per annum. SIO,OOO, there will be a de ficiency of $77,000. Forty words a day seems like rather a small allowance, and vet a hundred thousand dollars a year is no mean figure to pay out for it. Rev. L. B. Allen, D. D. f for many years connected with the college at Bur lington, has accepted the pastoral charge of the First Baptist Chnrch at Minneapolis, Minnesota. He goes at once to his new field of labor. Francis Allston Channing, a young Amer ican, and son of Rev. Wm. Henry Channing, has this year won an honor second to none at Oxford University in England. He gained the “Chancellor’s Prize” for the best English essay. This prize is open for competition to all the the students in the University, and, as a test of talent and scholarly acquirements, the winning of it places the successful candidate in the first rank of students. Pausing kor Observations.— Tbe Auburn Advertiser, the home organ of Mr. Seward, calls for a halt on the negro suffrage issue: “ Let ns pause a moment to take observations. The soldiers have returned from the war. They are a power in tbe land. Let us consult them. Unless they are in favor of negro suf frage their votes will defeat the party, and tbe candidates for office who favor it.” Saratoga c< Tribune.