Newspaper Page Text
&'"K &'* k* f|^ PRINCETON UNION. PUBLISHED EVERY THURSDAY. TE^SIwES^ 31.50 "E'er "STeai. A. A.CASWELL, EDITOR. G. I. STAPLES, BUSINESS MANAGEB. Dice: First St. East of Court House. PRINCETON, MINN., FEB. 20, 1896. BLACKBURN now leads in the Ken tucky senatorial race but the end is not yet. PROP. NANSEN must have moved the pole a distance south of where he first discovered it. CALLS for conventions are now in order and the campaign of 1896 may be considered "on." HE Aitkin Republican thinks the Minneapolis Times' attacks on Clough will result in ''dough's holding -onto his situation." STEVENSON is said to be preparing a free coinage of silver avowal with a view to entering the presidential race under the Democratic colors. CARNEGIE was blackballed when he applied for admission to the Cleveland chamber of commerce. Can this be called oppression of the poor? 4 Six new battle ships will probably be recommended by this congress. What's the matter with repairing our coast defenses too. or else adopt arbi tration? COMMITTEE men of all parties should familiarize themselves with the new election law and see that it is complied with. A short digest is printed on our first page. MINNEAPOLIS is having lots of fun settling numerous bank failures. Receivers are being appointed and re moved whenever the fit strikes the creditors. CHICAGO enjoyed a fall of two inches of black snow. It is safe to say the waste baskets of its newspapers are not overflowing with poems on "The Beautiful." SENATOR DAVIS talked Monroe doc trine in the senate Monday. His re marks were well received and may furnish considerable timber for his presidential platform. HE show men are not to be outdone by the great quadriennial political cir cuses. The Forepaughs and Sells Bros, have combined and promise to give us the greatest show on earth. DDLDTH Commonwealth: Let Wright county name the delegate, says the Delano Eagle. Very well, let 'em. We see no objection to Wright county's naming a whole row of delegates if it pleases them. WITH Barto, Houlton, Compton and Lemon striving to stand in the cast-off shoes' of Superintendent Lee, the State reformatory board cannot be said to be lacking in applicants from which to choose Lee's successor. ST. CLOUD has been obliged to em ploy a diver to examine the pipes of its waterworks. A change has evi dently come over the taste of its resi dents or it would not be so particular about its water supply. HE Blethen-Lowry "divorce" case is equalled only by the famous Hay ward case, if its importance is to be judged by the number of columns it oc cupies in the news departments of the Minneapolis newspapers. AUSTIN, Lena Olson's murderer, has a^ain been located. This information, however, is given by a Duluth string fiend and the numerous discoveries of this culprit make it advisable to swal low the morsel with a grain of salt. HE St. Cloud Times, after intimat ing that there were numerous scandals clinging to J. G. Blaine, says there are none which concern anyone con nected with the present administration. Is "Sweet Marie" so soon to be for gotten? AUDITOR DUNN has completed the abstracts of the tax lists for 1895. Thejr show an increased acreage of taxable lands reaching nearly 1,000,000 acres, which is due to the sales of State and railroad lands to private parties. The increase in taxes amounts to $2,333,955. THE Waseca Herald thinks one of the most amusing political incidents of Pj& the day is the Minneapolis organiza Ipiji-* tion of "one hundred" to smash the $$''*' "Republican party machine" of this |rv4 State. And "when the devil was sick, life- the devil a saint would be," but "when 'jrA the devil is well, devil the saint is he." FOR ARBITRATION.', There is a movement being made to secure to co-operation of all citizens of the United States in perfecting a method of arbitration which may be adopted by congress. ^~The era/^pf blood and battle seems to have de parted and all civilized nations are seeking bloodless adjustments of in ternational difficulties. .There should be no great difficulty encountered in making such arrangements with Great Britian for its subjects are just as heartily in favor of arbitration as their Yankee cousins are, and with two such nations supporting the cause, its uni versal adoption would be a question of a few months. The meeting held ,in New^ York last Tuesday evening was governed by men whojbave made this question a study. The resolutions there adopted, there fore, will acceptably show the trend of the movement. Whereas, the 'true grandeur of na tions" means the arts of civilization, justice secured by statute, and mag nanimity inspired by good will, which fundamental conditions are always marred by the wasteful, bitter vio lence of war and, whereas, the United States and Great Britain, akin in lan guage, jurisprudence and legal meth ods, are already accustomed to arbi trate their disagreements and have emphatically declared themselves in favor of such arbitrationcongress by the action of both houses in 1892, and the house of commons by its vote in 1893therefore, Resolved, that we earnestly desire such action by our national legislature and the executive as shall make per manent provision for some wise method of arbitration between the two coun tries, it being our hope that such a step will ultimately lead to interna tional arbitration throughout the civ ilized world. Resolved, accordingly, that measures be taken in the interests of such arbi tration and in concert with like com mittees from other cities, for the con vening in the city of Washington at the earliest practicable date, of a con ference of citizens representing every portion of the country, without dis tinction of party or creed. Besolved, that we gratefully recog nize the action already taken in this direction by representative citizens of Chicago, Philadelphia and other cities, and that we rely on their vigorous co operation in promoting the success of the proposed national conference. While this was being done in New York an arbitration debate occupied the attention of the members of Eng land's house of commons. The matter was not nicely put and the amendment was therefore lost, but the. speeches show that the feeling in England is very similar to that expressed in this country. Should the agitators of this method of settling international differences at tain success, the day of the adoption of arbitration would be hailed with-re spect and revered by posterity, and na tions who persist in supporting stand ing armies would be considered little better than barbarians. Let the day comeall Christendom stands ready to welcome it. THERE may be a fight this week be tween Maher and Fitzsimmons but the sand in the former's eyes may prevent it. The people will be glad to know that at least one prize fighter is pos sessed of sand, even if it is in his eyes. PIONEER PRESS: If the omission of all religious teaching in the public schools is all that is needed to estab lish peace in Manitoba, why, in the name of reason, do they not proceed to put it into effect? It has worked well on this side the line and ought to do so over there. SENATOR LODGE has introduced a bill restricting immigration which has several meritorious points. One is the exclusion of all persons who are so ig norant as to be unable to read or write any language. If this provision is adopted it will exclude most of the un desirable immigrants and work on this class alone. The present state of im migration laws threatens to perma nently injure the quality of our citizen ship and lower American wages. Sen ator Lodge's bill should become a law. 1 WADENA Pioneer: The organizing of committees composed of well-known politicians out of jobs, firing all kinds of political abuse and uncalled-for crit icisms at the devoted head of the gov ernor, and through the agency of mongrel newspapers like the Minneap olis Times, attempt to circulate all kinds of rot around the State about an alleged damnable and corrupt ring, of which Gov. Clough is the head, is a poor way to fight, and when such tac tics are pursued they are very liable to be repudiated by the people at large. Gov. Clough, so far as we know, is an honest citizen, who aspires to be gov ernor, and if the people object to him, which they have a perfect right to do, let them do it firmly and honestly, 'At all events he is entitled to far better treatment than he is receiving at the hands of a number of Minneapolis pol iticians, and if they keep it up the whole State is liable to repudiate such tactics SCISS0RI1VGS." t^f NO CHARGES MADE. Some of the Minneapolis papers as well as numerous citizens of that city, have commenced their fight on Gov. Clough and propose to defeat him for a nomination if possible. Thus far they have made no charges against his ad ministration, or given any reasons why he should not be re-elected gov eraor. The whole trouble is undoubt edly due to the fact that Gov. Clough was an anti-Washburn man, and help ed to defeat that gentleman when he was so anxious to spend another term in jthe U. S. senate. This and this alone seems to be the cause of the war fare on Gov. Clough. They propose to have revenge for the defeat of Wash burn. Unless the governor's enemies in Minneapolis can give good reasons why he should not be re-elected, they may find to their sorrow that they are not the Republican party of the State, and that they will not be allowed to carry out any such piece of spite work. One thing is certain and that is, that Gov. Clough cannot be blamed for as piring to the governor's chair, and for supporting Nelson instead of Wash burn during the senatorial fight. This he had a perfect right to do, and unless we mistake the temper of the Republi cans of the State they will not allow Gov. Clough to be sacrificed by the Minneapolis crowd for any such rea son. The Review is friendly to all the candidates for gubernatorial honors all good menand it makes no particu lar difference to us who gets the nomi nation, but we believe in fair play and don't want to see any man downed for any such reason as seems to be behind the Minneapolis opposition to Clough, and we think most Republicans will take a similar view of the matter. If those Minneapolis fellows don't look out, their warfare will prove a boom erang, and instead of defeating Mr. Clough, they will by their attacks, help to elect him.Litchfield Review. BARKER'S BOOM. If the outside counties of the Fourth congressional district are to be given a delegate to the National convention at St. Louis they could do much worse than send Hon. H. F. Barker, of Cam bridge, Isanti county.Mora Tribune. A CLEAN ADMINISTRATION.' Minneapolis' commitee of one hun dred are going to lay Gov. Clough on the shelf. They hare taken a big"con tract on their hands. Clough opposed Washburn for U. S. senator and for that reason he must be^slaughtered. The Banner does not like that kind of warfare. He had a right to oppose or favor Washburn in the senatorial race, and the present attitude of Minneapo lis Republicans toward the governor, instead of injuring him, will make him friends among right thinking people. He is giving the State a good clean ad ministration, and is making friends every day. If Clough is a bad man, let us know it and tell us" wherein he is bad, but this bitter opposition to him on account of Washburn's defeat for U. S. senator is nonsensical and' ought to and will end in confusion and dis grace.Royalton Banner. WILL NOT BE PILLED. Wanted,A hundred thousand men to pull chestnuts out of a very hot fire. Apply to Minneapolis committee of One Hundred, Minneapolis, Minn. Ortonvilh Herald-Star. ""ES, WOULD THEY? It is remarkable what an* air of sanctity has come over the committe of 100 politicians of Minneapolis and how their pure souls are filled with a sense of holy horror at the thought of the wicked Dave Clough being elected governor again. Would they have had their eyes opened to the depravity of the "wicked and unscrupulous ring that has been dominating the politics of the State the past eight years" if Washburn had been elected United States senator last winter?Slayton Gazette. VAN'S "DAN.",* It is hinted that the "Dan Logan" of Vandiver's book is the man who staked him into the St. Paul Review, two years ago and got him the secretaryship of the Minnesota Republican Editorial association. The blacksmith shop in cident, however, would probably be more true to life if the personages were reversed. What do you think about it, Dan?Midway News. \vf^^: ~TV" STiLtfuNANSWER^DS^'r/ Mr. McCleary did not get any' ova tion when he concluded his reply to Mr. Towne. At least the Associated Press reporters did not notice any. And Mr. Towne's argument still re mains unanswered.Duluth Herald. .& County tax ?tax,, List. STATE OF MINNESOTAJudiciarl .X-V of% cl Mlnn M&Sfi i^ aim an MilleS Lacsl, fss" \V event 1 Th 1S* 0 esota, too allv persons, com- ha vLChT?/UpJ?51eatl0ntv0e y?r? se S th f ?nS^n ny he enalti Thfi if 1 6 Mill 0 i mi^h^ nt 5 8^V?^ trt2?Sto* k6 January,, ?v. rstMoild aoy 0ffl c? thftth^^ 6 ha-s clerk of the dis th ^acs o1896, which i mil aid clerk on o? 0 1 that hereto attached iosf a iherefore, youn,-and each of youto, hereb-v *2ffi fle fl ccopy. taxes 0 th i tn setti nvge fr 6 tareany a ob ha n twentietyu (20r)t day of March, 1896, mt ma thereof, upon any a i^oHnn W6 MHTS^H? an 611 0r estate yo an ^.3. describeadi in said list, in, cl alties lan fnn^ll^t1 hav T?S X entered against and for the taxes on mcl yo wi H&J'f*? 6 ^eres claim or lien, and in de- ]Ug mt,,e nf d rce S ^riLee !o?,Ti?iec saitt list appearing against it, and for all pen alties, interesD costs. L. S. BRIGGS, ML iand tric Court, of the County of Mille Lacs. Minnesota. [SEAL.] A LIST OF DELINQUENT TAXES upon e^ 1 es iate -within the county of Mill J^acs, State of Minnesota, for the year A. D. 1894 remaining delinquent and unpaid on the first Monday January, J896, and the penalties accrued thereon. TOWNSHIP O PRINCETON. Town 36. Range 26. S3 nwJ J. P. Woodbury, nlA "gjj Name of Owner and Description. -2 cs^ (DO s3 N. Osman, eya of ne & sw# of $ ^ctk neM-... 1 120 19.12 wii- on lo 1 33-36 4.2 5 William Sorge, sea of sw 2 40 9 48 do swJ4 of seU 2 40 3.97 Charles Sorge, nwii of swj.. 2 40 5 01 XT do sw^ofsw^ 2 40 6.11 Newbert & VanAlstein, nw^ of riYu 45-1 8 6.0 9 3 Theodore Rosm, sw of nwM-. 3 40 5 01 do nwiofswJ4 3 40 7 99 Frank Maihock, ne of nwj^.. 4 45.92 8 75 PaulJohnson, s% of ne% 4 80 1198 do nwJf of neM & se% T, ofnwj^ 4 85.62 10.51 Ira Bullis, nwM of sw)i 4 40 5 01 R. Marden, sV of swJi 4 80 1152 Leonard Pratt. ne& of ne% 4 45.32 6.38 J. L. Brady, s}4 of nwJi & of sw 5 160 19.60 E. Payette, neU of sen 6 40 4 06 do nH of nej^of swM.. 6 20 1.42 do n'/ oflA nwj-fi ofe se^. 6 20 1.42 John C. Hatch2. n^ less 11.70 acres R. R.... 7 68.30 6.74 do wV2 of nwJ-4 less 3.51 acres R. 8 76.49 7.25 Kenney Bros., neM, of nej^.. 8 40 5.79 do nw^ofnej* 8 40 5.79 August Pinz, sea of neM 8 40 7.05 do swJa of neij 8 40 5.02 Kenney Bros., seM of seH 9 40 5.79 do sw^ofse 9 40 5.79 E. J. B. Calkins, neii of swM... 9 40 5.79 do nw} of swM 9 40 5.79 I. C. Patterson, swM of sw^t.... 10 40 5.79 T. S. Gile, nwM of sw}i 10 40 5.02 Deborah Pinkham, neM of se#. 12 40 6.02 John L. Larson, of seH & sw^ofneM 13 120 26.97 Sophia Bockoven, nxA of swJi... 13 80 14.21 DanielS. Conover, sr of swM-- 13" 80 19.64 Schilling Heirs, sy3 of nwj* of sw# 14 20 8.64 Bernard Kunkle, s^ of nwH-..- 15 80 13.27 D. E. Schilling, swi of se}4 .15 40 6.74 F. C. Cater, w^i of nw 17 80 13.49 H. Twitchell, nwii of seAf 18 40 4.06 Harriett Hatcher, sy. of se% less 3.21 acres R. R. 20 76.79 14.26 Charles Keith, of nei 21 80 13.49 Etta M. Libby, seM of se 21 40 7.59 Willis Leathers, nw# of se}. .21 40 6.74 JohnBoyn,nw& 21 160 34.61 George Schmidt, wV of neM.... 22 80 13.49 Mary Rines, wl/t of seH 23 80 U3.49 E. W. Cater Estate, nw# of nvr'A 24 40 37.49 do sYs of nvr% 24 80 12.16 Hiram Harrington, nwM of swM 24 40 8.48 C. H. Chadbourne, e% of nej^--- 24 80 14.54 John F. Bockoven, nej* of nwM 24 40 7 99 Peter Berg, ne)i of se& 25 40 5.79 A. Steves, sys of swM of nwM... 25 20 2.57 R. H. Steves, of sw# of nw# 25 20 2.57 do nwM ofvnwM 25 40 5.02 Mary Rines, of neM 26 80 13.27 I. S. Mudgett, seH of nw# 26 40 6.83 do lot two (2) 26 26.28 3.49 Whitney Heirs, ni4 of swM 26 80 14.62 do swMofnwM 26 40 5.91 do lot one (1) 26 40.20 13.92 I. S. Mudgett, s)4 of neM 27 80 15.43 do seM 27 160 22.79 'do three acres in seM otnwH 27 3 27.62 do forty-five acres in of swM 26 45 7.70 Ruth A. Briggs, e% of nwM less 3 acres to Mudgett. 27 77 16.92 Abe James, wM of nw# of nw#, 29 10 2.67 A. J. Cater, of ne% of seM-- 30 20 3.92 J. T. D. Sadley, e^of neMof se% 30 20 10.21 do geMofneM 30 40 4.76 E. Slater, wy. of seM 30 80 22.67 William Arnett, eyz of nwM 30 80 13.92 do ei4ofswM 30 80 19.35 Frank Harper Estate, nw#... 31 159.83 33.61 Michael Mahoney, sw^ 31 158.29 20.93 do se# 31 160 46.71 William Carmody, swM of swM- 32 40 22 36 Lydia J. Craven, swM of swX.. 34 40 5.80 Charles Berry, s% of se% 35 80 11.33 Fred Berry, sea of swtf 35 40 8.05 Town 39, Range 26. Unknown, nw& of sw1^ 1 40 2.76 do ne# of swM 1 40 2.76 do sw of swM 1 40 2.76 C. N. Nelson Lumber Co., seM of nwM 1 40 2.76 do sw^ofnwM 1 40 2 76 Unknown, ne of seo 2 40 2.76 se# 3 8 0 5.4 8 do ny, of swM 3 80 5.48 do sl A of nw 3 8 0 5.4 8 do nX of nwM 3 78.45 5.48 Keith & Cowles, nwM of nwM- 4 35.75 2.58 H. F. Brown, s% of neM 5 80 5.52 do e% of se& 5 80 5.52 H. C. Winhams, nys ofM do sl/ swAi 5 80 5.52 of nw 5 8 0 5.5 2 Keith & Cowles, ny3 of neM 5 64.29 5.11 do n^ofnwM 5 63.73 5.11 Unknown, nwX of seM 5 40 2.76 J. P. Woodbury, neM 6 140.38 8.45 do n^ofnwM 6 56.79 3.95 co w^ofseM 6 80 5.52 do swM 6 147.40 10.52 do seX of nw& 6 40 2.76 Mille Lacs Lumber Co., of nwif 7 67.91 5.52 do wJ4ofswM 7 69.73 5.52 Unknown, neX of neM 8 40 2.76 J. P. Woodbury, seM 9 160 11.04 do e^of nwM 9 80 5.52 Unknown, swM of nwM 9 40 2.76 Keith & Cowles, ne# of ne# 13 40 2.76 O'Neal Bros., swH of se% 13 40 2.76 do seM of swM 13 40 2.76 Charles Keith, se^ of swif 16 40 2.76 do neM of neM 16 40 2.76 do nwM of neM 16 40 2.76 do seM of ne# 16 40 2.76 Leonard Pratt, ne& of seM 17 40 2.76 do seM of seK ..17 40 2.76 Unknown. nw& of swM 17 40 2.76 do swM of swM 17 40 2.76 do seMofseM 17 40 2.76 E. S. Page, ne* 19 160 11.04 F. McCulloch, ny2 of neM 20 80 5.52 H. C. James, nwM 20 160 11.04 S. D. Castle, nwtf of neM 21 40 2.76 do n^ofnwM 21 80, 5.52 Mille Lacs Lumber Co., seM 21 160* 11.04 do seMofswM 21 40 2.76 Weston Hammons, neM of swM 21 40 2.76 do nwMofswM--: 21 40 2.76 R. McClellan, wViof neM---- 22 80 5.52 do "s^ of nwM 22 80 5.52 J. P. Woodbury, e& of swM-.-. 22 80 5.52 do seM 22 160 11.04 Unknown, neM of nw# .'.22 40- 2.76 do jsjrwJK of nwM 22 40 2.76 do sVSofnetf 23 80 5.52 do -neM of swM 23 40 2.76 do- neM of seM 23 40 2.76 do nwMof seM 23 40 2.76 D. Woodbury, sft of nwM 23 80 5.52 do,. "w}of swM 23 80 5.52 do- neMofswtf 24 4a g.76 -t/do* e%of nwX...... 24 80 5.52 do~^-seM 24 160K11.04 Laird & Norton, wVS of nw& 24 80 5.52 do vr)i of swM 24 80,' 5.52 do 25 160 '11.04 doa^swfc 25 160^.11.04 do seM 25 160-4^11.04 Unknown, seM of se& 26 40 2.76 do swM of seM 26 40 2.76 J. Woodbury, sX of nwM-..- 26 80" TOWNSHIP O PRINCETON, Town 39. Range 26. :wJW. District.'"**? *Sy Name of Owner and Description" -J s^S Meret in,-sclaim to a piece parcelor attached, described: Unknown, ne% of setf.. on real estate Us 1 fni^ Lacs, remaining delin- *a a' $ CtS 29 40, Yi 2.76 A. P. Heath, ne& of seM 30 40 2.76 do se^ of seM 30 40' 2.76 Unknown. wy2 of seM 30 80*" 5.52 do wVofswtf 30 54.26 4.71 do w^ofnwM 30 57.24 4.71 do, ne# of se# 32 40 2.76 do neM of swX 33 40 2.76 do se# ofsw& ai 40 2.76 do. ne# of seM 33 40 2.76 do nwMof seM 33 40.., 2.76 do seM of seM 33 40" 2.76 do swMofseM-.-.^.---. 33 40 2.7 6 do swMofswtf 33 40 2.76 Samuel Freeman, neM of neM-. 34 40 i.76 J. P. Woodbury, nwM of neM--- 34 40 .76 Dennis Boyle, se# of swM 34 40 2.76 Unknown, seM of ne# 34 40 2 76 do neM of sw# 34 40 2.76 do seMofseM 34 40 2.76 do swM of seM 34 40- 2.76 do neM of neM 35 40 2.76 do seM of neM 35 40 2.76 do neM of seM 35 40 2.76 do seMofseM 35 40 2.76 do neM of swM 35 40 2.76 do nwMofswM 35 40 2.76 do seM of swM 35 40 2.76 do swM of swM 35 40 2.76 Town 40, Range 26. Durant, Wheeler & Co., all frac. 1 46.14 2.11 Charles Keith, fractional... 2 15.78 .75 Charles Morehouse, all 6 45.63 2.27 do neMofnwM 7 40 1.88 do w^ofnwM 7 30.69 1.49 do vr% of swM 7 32.07 1.53 Unknown. seM 8 160 7.51 do ny, of neM 8 80 3.76 do n^ofnwM 8 80 3.76 J. S. Prince, seM of neM 9 40 1.88 do e)ofsw 9 80 3.76 Unknown, swM of neM 9 40 1.88 do swMofseM 10 40 1.88 do s'/j of nwM 10 80 3.76 do n^ofnwM 11 80 3.76 do sh of seM 11 80 3.76 do s^ofswM 11 80 3.76 Leonard Pratt, nX of neM 11 80 3.76 Unknown, sy of swM 12 80 3.76 David Tozier, nwM of swM 12 40 1.88 do neM of swM 12 40 1.88 Durant, Wheeler & Co., neM.... 12 160 7.53 do %yz of nwM 12 80 3.76 do neMofnwM 12, 40 1.88 Unknown, seM 12 160 7.53 Pascal Smith, seM 1 3 16 0 7.5 3 do neM 13 160 7.53 do S14 of nwM 13 80 3.76 do nViof swM 13 80 3.76 David Tozier, ny, of nwM 13 80 3.76 Pascal Smith, neM 14 160 7.53 I. S. Mudgett. neM of seM 14 40 1.88 Pascal Smith, nwM of neM 15 40 1.88 do s^ofneM 15 80 3.76 Rines & Mudgett, vry, of nwM-. 15 80 3.76 do n% of swM 15 80 3.76 Unknown, neM of seM 15 40 1.88 do swM of neM 15 40 1.88 I. S. Mudgett, ny2 of nwM & seM ofnwM 17 120 5.65 do s^of seM 17 80 3.76 do ey of swM 17 80 3.76 do nwMofseM 17 40 1.88 Chas. A. Bruff, e% of nwM 18 80 3.76 do of neM 18 80 3.76 .Unknown, eidof swM 18 80 3.76 G. H. Warren, swM of seM.... 19 40 1.88 Unknown, of ne 'i 19 80 3.76 do s'/i of nwM 19 80 3.76 do of neM 20 80 3.76 do eY of neM 20 80 3.76 do si^of nwM 20 80 3.76 do neMofnwM 20 40 1.88 J. P. Woodbury, nwM of seM & seMofswM 20 80 3.76 do s^of seM 20 80 3.76 R. M. Cole, swM of neM 21 40 1.88 do nwM of seM 21 40 1.88 do ny2ofneM 21 80 3.76 J. H. Townsend, nwM of nwM 21 40 1.88 do of nwM 21 80 3.76 Unknown, nwM of swM 22 40 1.88 do swMofswM 22 40 1.88 J. H. Townsend, eys of swM 22 80 3.76 do seM 22 160 7.53 Unknown, neM 24 160 7.53 I. S. Mudgett, swM 24 160 7.53 D. Woodbury, w% of nwM 26 80 3.76 Unknown, ny2 of seM 27 80 3.76 do neM 27 160 7.53 do swM 27 160 7.53 J. H. Townsend, nwM 27 160 7.53 Unknown, swM of neM 28 40 1.88 do nwMofswM 28 40 1.88 do neM of swM 28 40 1.88 do swM ofnwM 28 40 1.88 do seM of nwM 28 40 1.88 do neMofnwM 28 40 1.88 do seM of swM 28 40 1.88 A. W. Woodcock, seM of swM-- 30 40 1.88 Unknown, swM of swM 30 24.29 1.08 do nwM of seM 30 40 1.88 do swM of neM 30 40 1.88 do swM of seM 30 40 1.88 do of swM 30 64.29 2.62 Reed& Sherwood, eY2 of seM- 30 80 3.76 Campbell & Gould, nwM of seH 31 40 1.88 do swM of seM 31 40 1.88 Unknown, seM of swM 31 40 1.88 do swM of swM 31 40 1.88 do neMofnwM 31 40 1.88 do seM of nwM 31 40 1.88 do swM ofnwM 31 27.29 1.30 do seMofseM 31 40 1.88 do neMofswM 31 40 1.88 do neM 31 160 7.53 Frank L. Darrow, s1^ of seM-... 3 2 8 0 3.7 6 do nwMofseM 32 40 1.88 F. M. Campbell, ey2 of swM 32 80 3.76 do ey. of nwM Si 80 3.76 A. W. Woodcock, neM of seM... 32 40 1.88 do swM of seM 32 40 1.88 Hersey &Bean. seM of swM---. 33 40 1.88 I. S. Mudgett, e% of nwM 33 80 3.76 do nwMofseM 33 40 1.88 Charles Peterson, of seM- 33 80 3.76 Unknown, swM of swM 33 40 1.88 do neMof swM 33 40 1.88 do neM of seM 33 40 1.88 I. S. Mudgett, seM 34 160 7.53 Town 40, Range 27. C. H. Chute, neM of swM & sy. of swM 9 120 7.08 E. C. Long & Co., hlA of seM & nwMofseM 9 120 7.06 do n&ofneM 9 80 4.69 do nys of nwM & swM ofnwM 9 120 7.06 do n'A of seM & neM of swM 17 120 7.06 MonroeBros., seM 18 160 9 09 do e% of swM 18 80 4J71 E. C. Long & Co.. vrYu of swM... 18 107.33 6.37 do nwM of nwM 19 51.94 2.36 Mille Lacs LumberCo.,e^of swM 19 80 4 71 E. C. Long & Co., nM of swM 20 80 4 71 do seMofswM 20 40 2.36 Unknown. n% of seM 80 80 4 71 do s^ of seM 20 80 4!?1 do w^of ne^V 80 4.71 n r, T 5 ofse 2211 do se 5.5 2 HT do swM 26 160/ -11.04 do n^ofneM 27 80. 5.52 do eX of nwM 27 80 5.52 Unknown, sM of seM 27 80" 5.52 do s)Sofswtf 27 80 5.52 vi, -do^ne* of setf 27 40 2.76 Wj do&VnwMof seM 27 40 2.76 A,J, doff&nelf of swM 27 40 2.76 ilS doigSnwM of swM 27 40 2.76 dogPseM of neM 27 40 2.76 lllf domswM of neM 27 40 2.76 S i doil|swK of nwM 27 40 2.76 ftfe doS||neMof nwJf 28 40 2.76 Jill do nwMof nwM.'...^-.. 28 40 2.76 2.36 E. C. Long & Co., seM of seM... 21 40 2.36 do nwMofswM 21 40 2.36 do seM of neM 21 40 2.36 do n^ofneM 22 80 4.71 do s^ofsw 22 80 471 do s^ofseM 22 80 -4.71 do swM of neM 22 40 2.47 do nwM 22 160 9.45 Leonard Pratt, seM of neM 22 40 2 47 do niiofseM 22 80 4!71 Unknown, of swM 22 80 4 71 do eMlofseM 24 80 4.71 A. W. Woodcock, seM of seM... 25 40 2 36 E. C. Long & Co., ey. of neM.... 25 80 4^71 do swM of seM 25 40 2.36 do n% of nwM 26 80 4.71 do n^ofneM 27 80 4.71 do eY2 ofnwM 27 80 4.71 do e^ofseM 27 80 4.71 de seM of neM 27 40 2.36 do nwM of nwM 27 40 ,2.36 do swM 27 160 5 9.4 0 Unknown, swM of nwM 27 40 2 36 do w^ofseM 27 80 4- jPj TOWNSHIP O PRINCETON. Name of Owner and Description. -2 C. N. Nelson Lumber Co., sy of neM 6 a- do s"4of nwM 6 do ny, of swM 6 do s}4of seM 6 do nwM of neM 6 do seM ofnwM 6 Unknown, &eM of neM 8 do seMofswM 8 E. S, Page, swM of nwM 8 C. N. Nelson Lumber Co., nwM of neM&nVSof nwM 8 do of swM 8 do s54ofseM 8 do all of 9 Gouldberg&And'rs'n, nJ4 ofnwM 10 do seMofseM 12 do seM of swM 12 David Tozier, all of 13 C. N. Nelson Lumber Co., all of 15 do seM of seM 18 H. C. Woodward, nwii 18 do. swM 18 J. Dean, of seM 18 E. S. Page. seM of neM 18 Charles Peterson, w}i of neM... 18 Bessie Paulson, w% of nwM. 20 E. S. Page, neM of nwM 20 C. N. Nelson Lumber Co., neM 20 do seM 20 do swM ..20 do seM of nwM 20 do all of 21 Gouldberg&Anders'n,n^of nwM 22 Weston Hammons, e% of seM 22 do nwM of seM 22 C. N. Nelson Lumber Co., seM- 23 do swM 23 Gouldberg & Anderson, neM 24 Taylor, swM of swM 24 W. C. Cates, ey of seM. 24 Weston Hammons, of nwM. 24 Unknown, seM of swM 24 do sw of seM 24 David Tozier. all of 25 R. H. Willis. neM 26 do neMof seM 26 R. C. Libby. w% of seM 26 David Tozier, all of 27 C. N. Nelson, seM 28 C. N. Nelson Lumber Co.. nwM. 28 do seM of swM & nwM of neM 28 do sM of neM 28 do nYz of swM 28 do allot 29 do neM of neM 30 do s% of neM 30 do nwM 30 do swM 30 do seM 30 J. Dean, nwM 32 ]60 do wK of swM 32 80 C. R. Fox. s'/^of seM&seMof swM 32 120 David Tozier, all of 33 640 C. N. Nelson, nwM of neM 34 40 Robert O'Malley, neM of swj'.. 34 40 do nwM of nwM 34 40 David Tozier. all of 35 640 Town 41, Range 26. W. M. Barrows. nwM 2 156.03 do ny2 of swM 2 80 do swM of swM 2 40 do nwMofneM 2 40 do ne of seM 2 40 do neM of seM 3 40 do swM of nwM 3 40 do nwMofswM 3 40 Unknown sJ4 of seM 3 80 do nwMofseM 3 40 do neM 3 160 A. W. Woodcock, nwM of nwM. 3 40 do swM of swM 3 40 do ny. of neM 4 80 do swM of neM 4 40 do nwM of seM 4 40 do of seM 4 80 do eY of swM 4 80 do nwM 4 164.60 L. M. Lane, seM of neM & neM of seM 4 80 do nwM of nwM 5 do nwM of swM 5 J. H. Thompson, of seM 5 Weston Hammons, nwM of neM 5 do neM of seM 5 A. W. Woodcock, neM of neM 5 do neM of nwM 5 do seM of neM 5 Unknown, s% of swM 5 E. C. Long & Co., nwM of swM 6 Merriman&Barrows, seM of se 6 do neM 6 E. H. Neely, ny, of nw 'i 6 L. M. Lane, of nwM 6 do s^ofswM 6 do ny, of seM 6 do swMofseM 6 do neM of swM 6 O. C. Merriman. of nwM 7 do ny. of neM 7 Unknown, s% of neM 7 do seM of nwM 7 E. C. Long & Co., swM of nwM- 7 do nwM of swM 7 do seMofswM 7 do s4 of nwM 8 Unknown. swM of neM 8 do seM of neM 8 do nwM of ne 8 do neM of nwM 8 0. C. Merriman, neM of neM & nwM of nwM 8 do nwM 9 do seM 9 Merriman & Barrows, swM of neii &n% of swM. 9 A. W. Woodcock, nK of ne3^ 9 do swM of swM & seM of neM 9 Unknown. neM of swM 10 do nwM of swM 10 do nwM of nwM 10 do neM of nwM 10 do sy. of seM 10 do s% of nwM 10 do s^ofswM 10 do seM of neM 12 1. S. Mudgett, nYa of seM 14 J. H. Thompson, swM of swM... 15 do nwMofseM 15 O. C. Merriman, neM of neM 15 do swM of neM 15 Weston Hammons, neM of nwM 15 Merriman&Barrows. seMof swM 17 Unknown. seM of nwM 17 O. B. Sturtevant, e% of neM 18 Unknown, ey. of seM 18 do neMofnwM 38 O. C. Merriman, neM of neM 19 do swM of nwM 19 do wYz of neM 19 do e% of nwM 19 do w^ofseM 19 do swM 19 Unknown, e% of seM 19 Page Bros., neM 20 Mille Lacs Lumber Co.. w& of neM 21 do ey, of nwM 21 do nwM of seM 21 do nwM of swM 21 do neMofneJf 21 do swM of swM 21 do w% of swM 22 Page Bros., neM 22 do seM 22 George Lane, nwM of swM 24 S- W. Farnham, seM of swM-. 24 do nwM of neM 25 do neM of nwM 25 C. E. Brown, swM of swM 26 Unknown, w% of swM 27 do neM of swM 27 Eugene L. Trask, seM of nwM.. 27 J. B. Gillfillan, syx of seM 27 do swM of swM 28 J. H. Thompson. n} of neM. 28 do e% of seM 28 do of nwM 28 do neM of nwM 28 do seM of neM 28 do swM of neM 28 D. A. Caley Estate, nwM of swM 28 Unknown, seM of swM 28 George H. Warren, swM of swM 29 Unknown, nwM of neM 29 do n'A of nwM--. 29 do eYi of swM 29 do e^of .7 1 do nwMofnwM 28 40 2.36 Mille Lacs Lumber Co., seM 28 160 9 40 E. C. Long & Co., swM of nwM.. 28 40 2.36 do swM Of swM 28 40 236 Unknown, neM-. 29 160 9 40 do nwM 29 160 9.'40 do SWM 29 160 9.40 -r R. M. Cole, aU of San 45 G-N. NelsonJLiwixber Co., all of 3 608.32 44 01 Gouldberg&Anderson,eJiofneV 4 70 44 Kil do nM ofnwM 4 60.27 4 43 nwMofswM 40 C. N. Nelson Lumber Co., nwM ofneM 4 30.32 2 44 kds^ do swM ofnwM-. 4 40 2 aa do allot .&.. 5 m02 4365 Jos. Dean, nwM of nwM .9 6 34.60 2 70 Jos. Dean, neM of neM 6 31.43 2 ia do nwMofswM 6 31.88 243 Isaac Staples, of seM 6 80 5 88 "0 a s $ CtS 5.88. 5.88 5.88 5.88| 2.93! 2.93 '2.93 2.93! 3.68| 5.88 11.85 11.85 5.88 8.87 48.80 2.93 48.80 9.22 4.69 2.36 2.36 4.69 2.42 2.36 4.69 2.42 2.36 2.42 2.42 2.36 4.69 2.42 2.42 41.64 40 80 40.54 40 41.49 41.59 40 80 50.03 40 165.14 102.53 91.14 88.92 80 40 40 88.25 80 80 40 48.03 47.81 40 4.69 9.39 9.39 160 160 120 80 7.06 160 SeM swH 2 9 16 0 9.4 0 JudsonGoss, neM 30 160 13.47 A. C. Smith & Co., e% of nwM.. 30 80 4.69 C. H. Chute, w% of swM 31 101.37 5.94 do swMofnwM 31 54.97 3.16 Unknown, seM of neM 32 40 2 36 do w^of neM 32 80 4 L~ do e^ofnwM 32 80 4.71 of swM 32 80 4.71 Mille Lacs Lumber Co.. w% of c 32 80 4.71 E. C. Long & Co., neM of neM.. 32 40 2 36 Unknown, e% of swM 33 80 4*71 do sK of neM 33 80 4*71 t^v do ei4of nwM 33 80 4*71 do nwMofneM 33 40 2*38 "M" do swM of swM 33 40 2.36 Town 41, Range 25. C. N. Nelson Lumber Co., aU of 1 609.03 72 71 y{* do s^ofnwM 32 do neMofnwM 32 do neM of swM 32 Mille Lacs Lumber Co., nwM of nwM i 32 D. B. Rollins, ei4 of seM 32 D. B. Rollins, swj of swM 33 do neMofswM 83 Unknown, seM of swM A. 33 do neM of neM 33 do nwMofneM 83 2.36 4.69 4.69 4.69 12.36 2.36 2.36 2.36 29 do swM of seM 29 do nwMofswM 29 do seM of nwM 29 r, 4 nw 2 9 F. C. Barrows, nwM of neM & swMofseM 30 do of neM 30 do n^ofseM 30 do nwM 30 do swM 30 tleorge H. Warren, seM of seM. 30 J. B. Gilflllan, neM of neM 30 L. M. Lane, w% of neM 31 do e^of nwM 31 Unknown, of neM 31 i do s54ofseM 31 do neM of swM 31 do nwMof seM 31 jh., do neMofseM 31 do swM of swM 31 do nwMofswM 31 do seM or swM 31 %f do neM 32 *y do s^ofwM 82 Zv do w%osf se '3 2 6.744 T-"4.69 ^.69 -.2.36, 2.3ffM, 2.86JP 95 2.78V*' 85 2.72L 2.~" 80 4.69 40 -'2.36 40 2.36 40 2.86 40