Springfield weekly Republican. [volume], November 10, 1910, Page 10, Image 10

About Springfield weekly Republican. [volume] (Springfield, Mass.) 1851-1946

Image provided by: Boston Public Library

                
10
STATE VOTE IN DETAIL.
GOVERNOR AND LIEUTENANT
*L
And for M«nbfr« of Congress in the
Wrxtprn Wnssnchnsetts Coonties.
In order that its readers may have the
fullest information possible regarding
Tuesday's election in this part of the state.
The Republican jives in the tables which
follow the details for Draper and Foss and
Cassidy and Frothingbam, together with
the detailed vote in the three eastern eon
tessional districts of the state:—
FIRST DISTRICT.
Lieutenant- Congress-
Governor, governor. man.
r ~T~i £5 fc
“ 5 S S. * 1
s E E S ■
. v: d n
: : : g. 3 :
; S ; ;
Hamtdkn Co. ■ : ? :
Agawam 235 215 ITS 229 231 167
Blnndford 65 16 15 60 63 16
Chester 76 49 41 SO 73 46
Granville 41 29 21 37 40 29
Holyoke 2i*69 3634 3412 3021 2107 3314
Montgomery 22 S S 21 20 S
Russell 55 36 36 54 55 31
Southwick 00 40 36 85 87 32
Tolland S 7 5 S 8 6
Westfield 941 971 593 950 964 943
W Springfield 472 464 397 487 4*B 3SS
10 towns 4077 5449 5042 4012 4096 4975
Hampshire Co.
Chesterfield 70 18 15 67 61 19
Cummington 102 15 40 92 93 21
Goshen 38 2 2 39 38 2
Hatfield 122 140 ISO 115 109 148
Huntington 132 92 88 123 140 72
Middlefleld 24 6 5 25 25 5
Plainfield 81 5 6 74 75 6
Southampton 112 17 17 104 104 21
Westhampton 47 10 6 46 47 8
Williamsburg 194 ITS 150 181 176 175
Worthington 69 9 6 66 66 7
11 towns 991 487 465 932 934 483
Frjlsxi.in Co.
Ashfield 92 16 16 85 83 14
Rernardston 73 16 13 71 66 14
Buckland 116 102 78 111 107 99
Charlemont 136 16 18 128 118 21
Colrain 113 25 17 111 103 20
Conway 108 41 41 105 104 43
Deerfield 185 96 73 188 179 81
Gill 66 17 10 70 65 18
Greenfield 861 615 543 871 817 610
Ilawlev 23 0 0 22 24 0
Heath 43 7 8 41 41 9
Leyden 43 8 5 43 38 7
Monroe 14 4 5 13 13 5
Rowe 35 8 8 34 31 13
Shelbfirne 196 57 50 196 198 88
Whately 67 31 36 59 57 36
16 towns 2171 1039 921 2148 2014 1076
Berkshire Co.
Adams 593 654 801 478 634 569
Alford 16 24 24 15 14 29
Beeket 7S 43 35 76 78 35
Cheshire 106 98 111 94 112 85
Clarksburg 81 30 43 70 87 26
Dalton 267 251 264 251 29* 254
Egremont 68 22 21 53 .V? 22
Florida 27 9 9 28 31 5
Gt.Barringt’n 461 501 440 451 438 489
Hancock 57 18 18 57 59 15
Hinsdale 78 79 84 74 83 72
Lanesboro 74 52 68 60 75 44
Fee 342 382 347 257 303 350
Denoi 159 221 219 154 101 214
Monterey 45 io 7 44 42 9
Mt Washlng n 12 4 4 12 12 2
New Ashford 14 6 5 13 15 4
N. Marlboro 57 37 33 56 62 38
No. Adams 1218 1568 1 655 1117 1357 1420
Gtis 55 16 14 47 51 10
Peru 19 20 21 16 19 21
Pittsfield 2287 2358 2347 2051 2191 2216
14 44 44 20
Sandlsfleld 37 24 24 S 3 35 24
55 21 20 48 53 21
Sheffield 147 92 82 137 129 99
Stoekbrldge 200 147 135 183 188 145
Tyrlngham 35 21 16 35 34 21
Yiashlngton 25 10 fi 2fi 2g 10
w,m ck \ r , lrtge 89 91 94 82 79 98
VtUHamst'wn 290 233 237 276 200 337
Windsor 36 7 11 30 32 9
2 cities. —■—
30 towns 4592 4483 4727 4234 6968 6707
Totals 1183111478 11155 11326 14012 13241
SECOND DISTRICT.
Lieutenant- Congress-
Governor. governor. man.
T 7 Ts T 1
M ?■ m
Hampden Co. • B :
ftrimfleld 59 26 24 57 68 28
Chicopee 842 1396 1287 837 778 1440
K Longme’w 93 46 36 94 97 42
Hampden 63 35 42 49 61 47
Holland 16 6 7 16 15 6
Longmead-w 121 57 49 120 100 78
Ludlow 161 161 136 168 146 167
Monson 345 254 239 334 327 268
Palmer 430 477 477 425 407 494
Springfield 5262 4699 4376 5312 4848 5206
"ales 31 19 17 32 34 10
Wilbraham 98 4 7 44 95 S 3 56
2 cities.
10 towns 7519 7223 6734 7539 6944 7851
Hampshire Co.
Amherst 552 236 212 562 4<w oar
Kelcbertown 212 86 73 201 192 1?
Easthampton 575 464 473 554 545 541
Er,field 119 21 20 lti ffi
Granby 8* 24 23 80 7 r .
Greenwich 40 n 9 47 2 ?S
Hadley 151 87 72 145 oo
Northa pton 1352 1450 1316 1338 1263 1486
Pelham 32 12 10 34 30 14
Prescott 38 9 7 eg ~
South Hadley 415 247 231 406 404 253
" a,e 680 610 568 388 374 630
1 city.
11 towns 3969 3257 3014 2913 3919 3473
Franklin Co.
Erring 108 68 58 100 83 68
Leverett 51 13 13 49 44 17
Montague 399 444 458 397 381 491
New Salem 35 7 6 49 49 n
Nortbfleld 123 59 45 120 114 61
Orange 556 265 199 573 524 291
Shutesbury 22 0 0 20 10 h
Sunderland 93 16 15 91 86 24
Warwick 23 9 10 21 19 m
Wendell 31 33 25 30 36 24
10 towns 1461 916 829 1429 1355 1002
WORCESTEB CO.
Athol 720 479 416 741 705 489
Barre 207 si 60 201 207 00
Brookfield 196 153 122 201 196 143
Hana 79 32 27 76 7»| 20
Hardwick 139 128 118 144 142 132
N.Braintree 55 14 16 29 40 17
Noßrookfd. 246 206 174 244 236 204
Oakham 56 18 14 55 56 17
Petersham 93 43 37 87 81 38
Phlllipston 52 6 5 52 51 6
Royalston 79 25 21 79 78 22
Warren 230 214 192 235 237 906
W.Brookfield 117 91 71 125 124 TO
13 towns 2209 1490 1273 2260 2235 1448
Totals 15218 12886 11830 141001445818774
FOURTH DISTRICT.
Lieutenant- Congress-
Governor. governor. man.
o t r ~ n
•tO » n
nun
;r r :
: ■ s : :
Acton 239 lil 86 2113 127 222
Ashliurnham 174 101 78 177 118 156
Ashby 113 »r, 32 Km 39 «7
Ashland 188 114 92 201 122 ISO
Ayer 198 245 198 212 246 192
Bedford 135 53 62 1108
Berlin 1(4 24 13 152 127 144
Bolton 114 15 IS 116 24 107
Boxboro 36 19 TO 39 16 39
Boy Ist on ms 15 11 102 12 107
< linron 915 1205 1027 942 1235 841
1 oneord 4sx 3ns 512 301 402 416
Utebburg 2229 2121 1778 2344 2170 2118
rrimiiugh’tn 10« o 111.3 958 1140 I lot ions
Gardner BUS 840 60S 1072 097 1158
Groton 209 123 137 190
Harvard 79 41 30 103 4V 96
Hubbardston 110 31 26 108 35 101
Hudson 590 564 505 514 051 403
Lancaster 29S 07 46 210 50 214
l-eomlnster 1249 1098 883 1322 1240 1086
Lexington 493 273 247 504 310 475
Lincoln 113 75
Littleton 114 09 47 123 76 i<>o
Lunenburg 151 32 25 146 60 52
Marlboro 1224 1588 1427 1241
Maynard 356 384 361 360 455 316
Natick 90s 1110 1034 901 1235 773
Northlmro 200 107 84 215 121 ISB
Pepperell 245 192 201 239
Princeton 80 15 9 88 14 TO
Shirley 115 74 62 114 no 110
Koutlilvoro 201 114 99 201 153 163
Sterling 150 51 441 150 53 141
Mow 111 01 49 114 04 103
1 Snd'ntiry 124 *v> 40 144 ,-6S IIT
! Templeton 204 !{*»> 124 214 lOrt *jtw
| Townsend 107 78 50 200 70 101
i Woithn;>i *_’2*s 2018
! Way fen n«l 2.CS l!»H 1M _'4s 210 205
West ford 220 120 1W 227 158 ISO
i Westminster ]*>4 ::o 2s i(W mo ws
I Weston 247 dl 47 253 73 217
: Winchcndon 490 380 288 494 44* * 435
i Totals
DISTRICT.
Lieutenant- Congress-
Governor. governor. man.
r ~° ? D -E '-i a
® I 5 2.* i
* =' e: * a*
r : fi r I
: : er a
: : ; E : ;
Auburn 141 358 124 147 159 142
Charlton 164 76 39 166 74 165
Douglas 182 179 132 202 175 18S
Dudley 151 23S 203 364 250 156
Grafton 302 234 385 319 231 314
Holden 188 56 58 192 57 201
Leicester 230 283 240 230 283 229
Military 304 364 .301 307 377 285
Northhridge 515 :tf>2 298 547 511 393
Oxford 245 203 157 249 209 23*
Paxton 32 20 10 36 17 34
Rutland 79 40 34 79 42 77
Shrewsbury 209 63 58 208 72 *Ol
Southbridge 548 1032 907 573 1025 547
Spencer 44S 667 530 453 604 451
Sturln-idge 133 95 76 136 99 133
I Sutton 134 150 104 134 143 142
I Uxbridge 287 268 23S 255 298 272
j Webster 518 794 657 555 765 593
W. Boylston 129 41 30 127 37 127
Westhoro 480 314 271 497 335 477
Worcester 852610129 8467 9023 9579 9067
Totals 13945 15515 13164 14629 1534114426
VOTE FOR SENATORS.
First Hampden District.
[Candidates: Jenness K. Dexter of Spring
field, rep: Marcus A. Klemraer of Spring
field, soe; John F. Malley of Springfield,
dem.l
Hampden Co.
Springfield.
Wards. 1234567 8 T'ls.
Dexter 735 183 225 599 611 288 1119 818-4578
Klemmer 83 24 29 44 51 40 101 109— 481
Malley 1207 642 334 552 456 572 822 699—5294
Plurality for Malley over Dexter, 716.
Second Hampden District.
[Candidates: Frederick Childs of Holyoke,
rep ; John R. Klrwln of Westfield, soe.;
Francis X. Quigley of Holyoke, dem]
Kir- Quig-
Hampden Co. Childs. win ley.
Chicopee 844 S 9 1321
Holyoke 1883 213 3827
Westfield 864 168 958
West Springfield 436 51 433
Totals, 4 towns 4027 521 6539
Majority for Quigley. 2512.
Worcester-Hampden District.
[Candidates: Michael T. Kane of Ludlow,
dem: Walter B. Mellen of Brookfield, rep.]
Worcester Co. Kane. Mellen.
Barre 69 201
Brookfield 125 222
Charlton 71 159
Dana 31 74
Dudley 258 149
Hardwick 142 137
Hubbardston 29 9S
Leicester ....; 262 228
New Braintree 17 49
North Brookfield 195 247
Oakham 20 46
Paxton 8 40
Petersham 34 80
Philllpston 5 50
Princeton 12 80
Rutland 48 73
Southbridge 1022 545 I
Spencer 629 441
Stnrbrldge 102 129
Templeton 157 288
Warren 239 222
West Brookfield 90 118
Totals. 22 towns 3560 8676
Majority for Mellen. 116.
Hampden Co.
Brlmfield 29 55
Hampden 41 60
Holland 7 16
Ludlow 185 144
Monson 291 308
Palmer 4TB 415
Wales . f. 23 29
Wtlbraham 71 76
Totals. 8 towns 1125 1093
Majority for Kane, 32.
Totals, 22 towns ....3560 8676
Majority for Mellen, 84.
Berlcshirc-Hampshlre-Hampden Dis
trict.
[Candidates: Thomas J. Kearin of Great
Barrington, dem; Allen T. Tread wav of
Stoekbrldge, rep.]
Berkshire Co.
Kearin. Treadway.
Alford 25 18
Beeket 39 78
Egremont 18 61
Great Barrington 489 495
Lee 321 340
Lenox 225 168
Monterey 13 42
Mount Washington .... 5 11
New' Marlboro 32 66
Otis 9 66
Richmond 18 43
Sandlsfleld 23 38
Sheffield 100 142
Stoekbrldge 151 209
Tyrlngham 18 SO
Washington 10 20
West Stoekbrldge 100 88
Totals, 17 towns ....1696 1903
Majority for Treadway 306.
Hampshire Co.
Chesterfield 17 67
Cummington 18 96
Easthampton 469 615
Goshen * 4 35
Hatfield 142 145
Huntington 91 124
Middlefleld 8 25
Northampton 1146 144«
Plainfield 5 72
Southampton 17 ion
Westhampton 9 40
Williamsburg 167 > 183
Worthington 8 62
Totals. 13 towns 2089 3025
Majority for Treadway, 936.
Hampden Co.
Agawam 185 224
Blandford 14 54
Chester 36 32
East I.ongmeadow .... 36 98
Granville 17 36
Longmeadow 55 110
Montgomery 8 21
Russell 34 52
Southwick 34 84
Tolland 5
Totals. 10 towns 424 770
Majority for Treadway, 348.
Totals ter the district 4109 569 S
Majority for Treadway, 1589.
Franklin -Hampshire Districi.
[Candidates: Charles P. Aldrich of Greenfield,
dem: John H. Schoonmeker of Ware, rep.j
Franklin Co. Aldrich. Schoonmaker.
Ashfield 26 72
Bemardston 18 61
Buckland 87 100
Charlemont 13 118
Colrain 30 ins
Conway 53 84
Deerfield 102 160
Ervlng 56 81
Gill 21 58
Greenfield 716 728
Hawley 1 22
Heath 17 28
Leverctt 10 42
Leyden 10 35
Monroe 5 12
Montague 333 369
New Salem 6 48
Northfleld 60 109
Orange 240 538
Rowe 9 29
Shelburne 77 A 365
Shutesbury 2 16
Sunderland 34 68
Warwick 9 *3
Wendell 21 32
Whately 30 49
Totals, 26 towns 1995 3155
Majority for Schoonmaker, 1196.
Hampshihk Co.
Amherst 243 526
Belehertown 58 210
Enfield ~ 13 123
Granby 39 77
Greenwich 8 47
Hadley 74 145
Pelham 12 28
Prescott 7 40
South Hadley 228 406
Ware 476 530
Totals, 10 towns 1158 2132
Majority for Schoonmaker, 974.
Totals for the district 3153 5287
Majority tor Schoonmaker. 2134.
Berkshire Districi.
[Candidates: John H. Mack of North Adnius,
deni: William Turtle of I’ltlsflgkt. rep.J
1 Berkshire Co. Mack. Turtle.
I Adams (SWS . 568
l Cheshire 94 , _ 117
THE SPRINGFIELD WEEKLY REPUBLICAN: THURSDAY. NOVEMBER 10. 1910.
! Clarksburg .15 73
! Dalton 261 230
I Florida 11 25
j Hancock 16 56
; Hinsdale 01
I Lanesboro 4S 70
New Ashford 6 13
: North Adams 1546 1127
i Peru 22 16
Pittsfield 2066 2355
Savoy 31 41
WiUifimstown 263 246
Windsor 5 32
Totals. 15 town 5161* 5060
Majority for Mack. 105.
Third Worcester District.
[Candidates: Levi H. Greenwood of Gardner,
rep. : Edward X. Sibley of Ashbumham,
1 dem.J
Greenwood. Sibley.
■ Ashbumham 119 135
: Athol 609 400
Fitchburg 2218 1773
Gardner 96S 64S
Leominster 1242 733
Lunenburg 134 19
ttoyalston 76 IS
Westminster 143 ' 41
Winchendon 452 299
Totals 6051 4094
Majority for Greenwood, 1937.
VOTE FOR REPRESENTATIVES.
Hampden County.
District No I—[Candidates: Henry TV. Hol
brook of Palmer, rep; John S. MacQuaid
of Monson, dem.]
Holbrook. MacQuaid.
Brlmfield 49 3*2
Holland 16 6
Monson 31« 277
Palmer 516 382
Wales 32 21
| Totals, 5 towns 929 718
Majority for Holbrook. 211.
District No 2—[Candidates : James F. Barry
of Agawam and John \V. Phelon of Gran
ville. dems; Aaron Bagg, ir.. of West
Springfield and Sylvester 1L Peebles of
Blaudford. reps.]
Phe-
Bagg. Barry. Peebles. lon.
Agawam 116 358 111 101
Blandford 44 13 70 15
Chester 62 94 30 38
East Longmeadow. SO 30 77 21 !
Granville 26 44 2S 24
| Hampden 44 41 43 21
! Longmeadow 98 81 S 3 38
| Ludlow 148 141 129 89 i
Montgomery 2 9 22 6
Russell 52 43 40 24
Southwick 67 56 63 25
Tolland 7 5 5 4
West Springfield .. 531 545 324 251
Wilbrahain 82 54 74 32
Totals. 14 towns. 1404 1537 1101 CS9
Plurality for Bags over T’helon. 715.
Plurality for Barry over Peebles, 436.
District No 3—[Candidates: John J. Carmody
of Springfield, dera : John Henry Curtiss of
Springfield, rep; William H. Ituscoe of
Springfield, soc. 1
Springfield. Carmody. Curtiss.Ruscoe.
Ward 1 992 913 103
Plurality for Carmody 79.
District No 4—[Candidates : John J. Harring
ton of Springfield, rep ; Michael J. Scully of
Springfield, dem.J
Springfield. Harrington. Scully.
Ward 2 221 609
Ward 3 294 247
Total 515 856
Majority for Scully 341.
District No o—[Candidates: .1. F. A. Hoppe
and Wilbo Hedman of Springfield, socs; Al
bert P. Langtry and Paul I. Lombard of
Springfield, reps ; Walter J. La Francis and
Frederick W. Otto of Springfield, dems.]
7e» b b §
a. t _ 3 a Z
E "2 5 a I- ?
P * P T »
5 B v; *2
• . n a
Springfield.
Ward 4 .... 47 54 376 639 62S 379
Ward 5 .... 54 46 315 644 635 307
Ward 6 .... 34 39 448 304 337 399
Total 135 149 1139 1587 1560 1085
Plurality for Langtry over I.a Francis, 448.
Plurality for Lombard over Otto, 475.
District No 6—[Candidates: Charles T. Holt
of Springfield, rep; William Manning of
Springfield, dem; Patrick J. Phelan of
Springfield, soc).
Springfield. Holt. Manning. Phelan.
Ward 7 1333 538 118
Plurality for Holt over Manning, 794.
District No 7—[Candidates: J. Watson Flan
nery of Springfield, dem: Peter Schmitt-'df‘
Springfield, soc; Ernest A. Witt of Spring
field, rep],
Springfield. Flannery. Schmitt. Witt.
Ward 8 559 W 5 895
Plurality for Witt over Flannery. 336.
District No B—[Candidates: John J. Barry
of Chicopee, dem; Charles F. McDevltt of
Chicopee, repj.
Chicopee
Wards. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 To’s.
Barry 179 202 120 247 311 24 253—1573
McDevltt .. 45 98 60 127 177 39 128— 679
Majority for Barry 894.
District No 9—[Candidate: George R. Burns
of Holyoke, dem).
Holyoke. Burns
B ard 1 1 599
Ward 2 541
Ward 4 405
Total 1805
District No 10—[Candidates: Thomas Davies
of Holyoke, dem; George C. Robert of
Holyoke, rep].
Holyoke. Davies. Robert.
Ward 3 578 340
Ward 6 636 200
Totals 1214 630
Majority for Davies 584.
District No 11—[Candidates 1 .Tens .T. Madsen
of Holyoke, rep.; Thomas F. McCullough of
Holyoke, dem ]
Holyoke. Madsen. McCullough.
Ward 5 230 543
B ard 7 681 490
Totals 911 1033
Majority for McCullough 122.
District No 12—[Candidates: Florence W.
Burke of Westfield, dem. ; Harry B. Putnam
of B'estfleld, rep. J
Burke. Putnam.
Westfield 967 1024
Majority for Putnam. 57.
Hampshire Coantj.
District No I—[Candidates : Richard March of
Northampton, rep.: Alfred J. Preece of
Northampton, dem.]
Northampton.
Wards. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 To'ls
March 155 221 272 154 149 159 145--1255
I’reece 279 212 242 196 299 182 132-1542
Majority for Preece, 287.
District No 2^Candidates : Leonard F. Hardy
of Huntington, rep. ; Austin R. McCarthy of
Easthampton, dem.J
Hardy. McCarthy.
Chesterfield 70 19
Cummington 18 23
Easthampton 598 499
Goshen 36 3
Huntington 146 66
Middlefleld 22 4
Plainfield 67 7
Southampton 99 23
Westhampton 41 10
Williamsburg 179 177
Worthington 68 9
Totals. 11 towns 1347 340
Majority for Hardy. 307.
District No 3—[Candidates: John J. Betsold
of Hatfield, dem. ; Harry L. Howard of Hat
field, rep.]
Betsold. Howard.
Amherst 212 541
Hadley 108 124
Hatfield 170 101
South Hadley 219 426
Totals, 4 towns 718 1192
Majority for Howard. 474.
District No 4—(Candidates: Henry Provost
of Ware, soc: Edgar K. Sargent of Belcber
town, fiem: B'illard A. Taylor of Granby,
rep].
Provost. Sargent. Taylor.
Belehertown 3 138 108
Enfield 0 39 104
Granby 1 53 65
Greenwich 0 22 37
Pelham 0 13 30
Prescott 1 9 35
Ware 140 569 347
Totals, 7 towns 143 843 786
Plurality for Sargent. 57.
Franklin County.
District No I—[Candidates: William B.
Avery of Charlemont, rep; Charles A. Hall
of Ashfield. dem).
Avery. Hall.
Ashfield 62 45
Buckland 120 39
Charlemont 131 , 15
Colrain 112 20
Conway 103 48
Hawley 21 2
Heath 43 8
Monroe 12 4
Rowe 33 9
I Shelburne 189 jos
Whately 60 41
Totals. 11 towns .... 886 \ 343
Majority for Avery. 340
I District No 2—[Candidates. Harold B. Flow..
of Greenfield, rep: Balter S. Hutchins
of Greenfield, soc clt: Harry E. Ward of
Greenfield, uem ].
~ . , Flower. Hutchins. Ward.
Greenfield 733 IS2 664
Plurality for Flower over Ward, 69.
• District No 3—[Candidates: John B'. Haigis
j of Montague, rep; John O’Connell of Monta-
I true, i.eni; George I. Varney of Montague.
1 SOC Clt].
O’Con
-0 , Haigis. uell. Varney.
; Bernardston 17 2 '
, Deerfield 191 86 5
I Gill 7;< g 4
i I.everett 45 9 0
I Leyden 36 9 0
I Montague 637 273 38
1 Sunderlaud 81 22 0
j Totals. 7 towns 1125 424 40
Plurality for Haigis over O’Conneli, 701.
j U L* trlct A° Charles F. Rob
bins of Orange*irm; Herbert M. Rogers of
I Orange, soc <5Tt; Alton A. Upton of Orange,
rep].
, Robbins. Rogers. Upton.
Ervlng 71 io 1 72
Northfleld 1:4 .3 108
New Salem « 0 49
'?™"Be 355 118 452
Statesnury 1 o 2 0
Wendell 29 3 *>s
Warwick 12 i
Totals. 7 towns 338 135 748
Plurality for Upton. 210.
Berkshire County.
District No I—[Candidates: Lincoln Brecken
ridgo of North Adams, dem. ; Albert G. Nieh
ols of North Adams, rep.]
Adams. Brcckenrldge. Nichols. V
B ard 3 291 117
IVsrO - 273 1 40
Clarksburg 45 L,
r lorida lo 2'
Siivo >' 22
Totals pas
Majority for Breckinridge, 352.
District No 2—[Candidates: Patrick 11. Ma-
J?sfy of : N< ?r tll Adams, rep. ; William A.
O Hearn of North Adams, dem.]
Adams. Maloney. O'Hearn.
“ 1 287 122
L’ 14s IJ2
lotals (5J)i C(u;
Majority for O’Hearn 115.
District No 3-[Candidates: John J. Hughes
f; 1 a " ms - Hern. ; Balter P. Smith of New
Ashford, rep.]
Hughes. Smith.
Cheshire !!.! 1& 4 !2
Hinsdale it
N‘*w Ashford p* mA
TV indsor g gg
TotaG fl towns 1130 ’es6
Majority ior Hughes 474.
D lev 1 of Michael Fiennes-
Hancoci: 3 re°p n i UeD '' 1 Charles J "
Dalton Henaessey. Lapham.
Hancock
Lanesboro . -.a
Pittsfield—Ward 1...!.. 353
A’illiamstowu 212 300
Totals 901 070
Majority for Hennessey 119.
District No 5- [Candidates: Henry E Kiose
rTttsAeld.Temj' 1 ' ‘ Cp; Mlchael F ' *>'
Pittsfield. Kloseman. Q uiun
Ward _2SI sob
Totals J 25 TiTvr
Majority for Quinn 182.
D nf tr pGt^fl°„is“ l o Candid u t S s: J<,hn J - Bastion
Pittsfield rep. ° * H ' DiCkSO “ of
w^“s* w ; Bas^, n s Diek ;^ n -
SK 1 * 268 400
Bard o ...........i.... 315 347
Totals 101 l ~970
Majority for B.osfion 32. -
Nn L-fCandlrlates: John E. Merritt
detn ] ’ reP ’ Ivorn,au Shannon of Beeket,
Beeket ' Merr 4 l 3 tt Shannon.
If® 224 468
tanox 153 238
Monterey 44
New Marlboro ........ 53 4...
Otis .X.• 47 34
Richmond 42 id
Sandlsfleld 40 25
Tyrlngham 29 30
Washington f.."... 25 ii
Totals. 10 towns u ... 707 "ggg
Majority for Shannon, 249.
District No 8- [Candidates: Franklin A. Pal
mfr, of , Stockbridge. rep: Alexander Sedg
wick of Stoekbrldge. dera.]
... , Palmer. Sedgwick.
Alford . 28 15
Egremont 57 23
Great Barrington 488 489
Mount Washington .... 11
|f e ®« ,d 144 108
Stoekbrldge 149 oig
West Stoekbrldge 92 *9O
Totals. 7 towns ;.... 967 943
Majority for Palmer 19.
Worcester County.
District No 1-[Candidates : Frank E. Gibbs
of Petersham, dem ; Merrick E. Hildreth of
Petersham, rep.)
. Gibbs. Hildreth.
Athol 268 569
£ ana 33 Hi
Petersham 59 6'>
Philllpston 5 43
Royalston 20 65
Totals 385 803
Majority for Hildreth. 418.
District No 2— [Candidates: B'endell P.
Clark of B’incbcndon, rep.; Charles M. Day
of B’lnchcndon, dem.; George N. Dyer of
Gardner, dem. ; Charles N. Edgell of Gard
ner, rep.]
Clark. Day. Dyer. Edgell.
Ashbumham 147 94 H 8 142
Gardner 791 520 907 840
Templeton 223 187 130 273
B'inebeudon 387 438 302 329
Totals 1548 1239 1457 1584
Plurality for Edgell over Dyer. 127.
Plurality for Clark over Day, 91.
District No 4 [Candidates: Eli M. Converse
of B'est Brookfield, rep.; James N. F. Quin
lan of IVarren, dem.]
Converse. Quinlan.
Brookfield 201 130
nardwick 143 126
New Braintree .47 17
North Brookfield 24*! 189
B’arren 225 238
B’est Brookfield 126 84
Totals 9SB 784
Majority for Converse, 204.
District No 6-y[Candidates: Alfred Arsenault
of Spencer, dem.; Edward B’arren of Leices
ter, rep.]
Arsenault. Warren.
Auburn 144 149
Leicester 229 288
Paxton 17 34
Spencef 729 422
Totals 1119 893
Majority for Arsenault, 226.
VOTE FOR COUNTY OFFICERS.
Hampden Comity Sheriff and Commli
oloner.
[Candidates: Sheriff. Bmbury P. Clark of
Springfield, rep: Daniel J. O'Neil of Hol
yoke, dem: county commissioner. George W.
Ilray of Chicopee, rep; Daniel Dunn of
Chicopee, dem.)
„ Sheriff. Commissioner
r » , « ,
• Clark. O'Neil. Brnv. Dunn.
Agawam 259 164 219 186
Blandford til 15 57 20
Brlmfield m 22 55 29
Chester 82 36 76 42
Chicopee 942 1205 973 1201
East I.ongmeadow. 102 33 99 35
Granville 43 25 38 28
Hampden 52 45 51 34
Holland 15 7 15 7
Holyoke 2025 3579 2076 3275
Longmeadow 126 46 113 53
Ludlow 187 120 168 134
Monson 350 220 323 225
Montgomery 22 6 21 6
Palmer 474 381 429 424
Russell 57 33 52 35
Southwick 110 30 88 29
Springfield 6Kk'l 3686 5350 3986
Tolland 8 7 9 6
H’ales 34 IS 34 19
Westfield 1056 323 937 913
West Springfield .. fill 350 458 393
Wllbrataam 100 44 nT 43
Totals. 23 towns 12771 10897 11738 11128
Majority for Clark, 1.874.
Majority for Bray, 610.
Hampshire Connty Sheriff and Com.
I mtseloner.
I [Candidates: Sheriff, George S. Buckner of
Easthampton. rep; Maurice Fitzgerald of
Ware, dem; county commissioner, Euxeue
E. Davis of Northampton, rep: Henry B r . I
Burner of Northampton, dem.)
Sheriff. Commissioner
1 -O i
5 3 :
Amherst 3.VJ 4UC r>i<> 259
Belehertown 137 lrts iss .<•§
Fhe&terttfld :»**.> ;»•.» (55
< uiumington *«'. 35 71 A 7
Easthampton 750 44-4 572 502
Enfield >2 63 10H 17
Goshen 40 3 2* 14
Granby 47 €i» 52 C 3
(ireenwich ,34 25 41 10
Hadley !M 150 135 100
Hatfield 81 IMS 1)3 173
Huntington 15S 107 110
Middlefleld 23 7 24 4
Northampton 1171 1770 JIM) 1505
lVlhnm 2S 10 30 14
T’lninfieM 77 0 51 22
Prescott 31 13 35 H
Southampton S 3 54 05 3.3
South Hadley .... 270 430 39S 271
Ware 2*o 840 384 635
Westhampton .... 43 17 32 ‘-’5
Willialnsburg 174 200 13.8 227
Worthington 58 2) 61 14
Totals. 23 towns.4oßß 5240 4400 4179
Majority for Fitzgerald 1152.
Majority for Davis 221.
Franklin County Sheriff and Commis
sioner.
[Candidates —Sheriff. .Tames IL Bridges of
Deerfield, rep.: Edward 11. Erhard of Orange,
ind. progressive; lOdson J. Pratt of Erring,
dem. County commissioner: Eugene li.
Blake or’ Greenfield, rep. ; Charles F. Elmer
of Conway, dem.J Com-
Sheriff. missioncr.
5- 5* 2 p g
«£5 £ |
* 7 c, 3"
Ashfield 69 *2 32 73 30
Bcrunrdstou 29 2 59 hi; ip,
Buckland 1' .*> H 103 nn 102
charlemont IX9 2 32 111 ;;f
Colrain 87 6 41 ion 27
Conway 57 5 96 f,2 99
Deerfield 198 4 92 175 go
Ervlng 37 5 159 1115 41
Gill 40 2 45 67 14
Greenfield 638 159 812 913 on
Hawley 20 0 4 4
Heath 22 0 27 37 13
I.everett 24 0 45 47 ; j
Leyden 26 0 20 35 10
Monroe 13 0 5 j;> 5
Montague 264 44 633 414 331
New Salem 38 1 IS 32 5
Northfleld 51 9 123 125 47
Orange 413 197 370 582 "29
Rowe 25 2 IS 33 "jo
Shelburne 101 9 149 159 89
Shutesbury 15 0 1; "t 0
Sunderland so 0 3] s:; 00
B'arwlek 16 3 1<; 2.8 ~9
B'endell 22 5 40 33 of
Bbately 57 0 57 41 60
Totals. 26 t0wn5.2552 468 3029 3461 1936
Plurality for Pratt 177.
Majority for Blake 1503.
BerLshire Connty Sheriff and Com
missioner.
(Candidates: Sheriff. John Nicholson of
Pittsfield, rep: Frederick It. Zeigler of Pitts
field, dem; county commissioner, George B
Adams of Adams, rep; Timothy J Crow
ley of North Adams, dem. | Com-
Sheriff. missioner.
Nieh- IGeg, Crow
. . Olson, ler. Adams, lev.
Adams 758 495 830 47K
Alford 30 25 17 09
Beeket .... * 88 30 74 3B
Cheshire 117 8.3 HR sg
Clarksburg . 91 21 77 37
Dalton 297 234 2N9 "30
Egremont HI 19 55 ~ni
Florida 26 8 29 "h
Great Barrington .. 514 439 480 469
Hancock 60 16 64 14
Hinsdale 106 55 81 74
Lanesboro 74 47 80 41
Lee 302 316 290 .362
Lenox 205 189 169 '>'>s
Monterey 4.3 11 40 a
Mt Washington ... 14 2 14
New Ashford 13 6 12 14
New Marlboro .... 48 38 59 33
No. Adams 1554 1166 1231 1614
Otis 53 16 47 10
Peru 22 18 17 '*o
Pittsfield 25*0 2121 2256 0073
Richmond 45 17 42 20
Sandlsfleld .87 25 33 28
Savoy 52 22 54 19
Sheffield 156 86 142 93
Stockhridge 245 126 192 171
Tyringham 43 )13 .32 ”0
Bashlngton 26 7 26 10
B'est Stoekbrldge. .97 85 86 93
Wllliamstowp ..... 319 195 °95 eog
Windsor 33 * 6 33 ~1
Totals,32 towns. .SOS 9 5959 726 S 6807
Majority for Nicholson 2130.
Majority for Adams 461.
DIRECT NOMINATIONS.
Third Franklin District.
l'es. No.
Bemardston 40 4
Deerfield 139 29
Gill 50 6
Leverett 25 2
Leyden 21 3
Montague 514 50
Sunderland 41 ]6
Total. 7 towns 830 110
Majority for Tes, 720.
Fourth Hampshire District.
Yes. No.
Belehertown 112 20
Enfield 52 is
Granby /. 46 6
Greenwich 24 3
Pelham 18 2
Prescott 13 9
B'are 592 56
Totals, 7 towns 857 504
Majority for Yes, 293.
PROTEST OF LETTER CARRIERS
Against the Retirement Bill
Serviee Employes.
A formal protest against the retirement
bill for civil-service employes as drawn
up by the congressional committee of
which Representative Frederick H. Gil
lett was chairman, was set forth by the
local letter carriers’ association at a meet
ing in the Spanish war veterans'hall in this
city*Thursday night. The association vot
ed at a former meeting to protest,
and a committee, which reported Thurs
day night, was appointed to draw
up a formal protest. The move against
the hill, which will come up for
consideration at the next Congress, is in
unison with a general protest which as
sociations of civil-service employes through
out the country are making. The hill is
objected to on the ground that it is un
constitutional and an injustice to civil
service employes. An increase of 40 to
55 per cent in the cost of living since
1805 and a corresponding increase of only
10 to 20 per cent in salaries of letter car
riers is given as the reason for a belief
that the contributory pension plan, which
is proposed by the bill, 5s a reduction of
salary when there is an urgent need of in
crease. President AVilliam H. Taft is
spoken of as a stanch advocate of a
straight pension plan and the carriers slate
thenfkelves as followers of him and advo
cates of what is known as the “Goulden”
bill, which provides for a straight pen
sum.
ROOSEVELT AND TAFT.
I From the Rochester Post Express. 1
Is not the ambition of Col Roosevelt
perfectly plain? When he was president
lie insisted that the republican state con
vention should indorse him for president
“two years ahead of time.” But he would
not let the convention indorse President
Taft for re-election. It is well known that
Col ltooßcvclt was the principal backer of
Mr Taft's candidacy for the republican
nomination. What would be more natural,
unless lie was selfish and ambitious, than
bis own indorsement of the administration
lie had virtually selected? But not a word!
Why? Because he wants to succeed Pres
ident Taft, instead of standing hv repub
lican principles, Col Roosevelt brings out
his new nationalism. Why? Because, in
his ambition to be president, he thinks an
appeal to radicalism will be more effective
than an appeal to conservatism. He feels
Unit if he stood on republican principles
the people would say. "Taft stands there,
too. and deserves a second term.” and that
would be fatal to Roosevelt's ambition.
So lie produces something new, and lowers
the jjignlty of the high offices he has held
h.v conducting a mud-slinging CRiiipAjgn.
Is it any wonder that the conservative
people of this country feel that the time
In rebuke him i« now? And tbat-this is
the time to condemn his purposes anil his
uriuuplca?
FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE DAY.
DR CHIPPED GETS GOOT NEWS.
Fafrfnl Rvent Will Not Take Place
Until the IGDI—A Philadelphia Story.
It was officially announced at Loudon
Monday tliat Ur Hawley 11. Oippen, con
victed and sentenced t»> death for the mur
der of his wife. Belle Elmore, would not
b*e executed Tuesday, as originally d,
for the reason that the law provides that
two weeks must elapse between the dismis
sal of an appeal and the carrying out of
the sentence. The li.’Jd has been fixed upon
as the date for the execution.
The Philadelphia Press Monday morn
ins published an interview with Francis T.
Tobin, a lawyer of that city, who stated
that he was in possession of proof that
Belle Elmore, for whose murder Dr Crip
pen lias been sentenced to death, was alive
and hiding near Chicago. Mr Tobin inti
mated that he would ask the state depart
ment to direct the American embassador «it
I/ondon to lay the matter before the British
home secretary.
It is a far cry from Mr Tobin’s asser- %
tion to the official announcement at Lon
don Monday that the execution of Crip
pen would he delayed until the *-3d, but
the coincidence is striking, in view of
the fact that the announcement was the
first intimation that the English \nv/.-
provided for a fortnight’s delay between
the dismissal of ail appeal and the execu
tion of a death sentence. On the con
trary. it was undorstod that the appeal
hearing was set for the sth in order that
a postponement of the execution would
not be necessary. When the appeal was
denied on Saturday the announcement of
the court’s decision was coupled with
what was taken to be a confirmation of
t he order of execution, which provided that
Crip pen should die Tuesday.
Mr Tobin's theory that Crlppen’s wife is
alive has been exploited in different quar
ters from the time of her disappearance,
and not alone by the defense but by vari
ous other parties who base their beliefs
on all sorts of grounds ranging from a
“plant” for theatrical press agent pur
poses. to au intention on the part of Mrs
Crippen to allow her husband to experi
ence tin* horror of a conviction before
coming to his rescue. At no time since Mrs
Crippen’s disappearance has anything defi
nite been produced to substantiate the
fantastic theory that, she is alive.
CANADIAN RECIPROCITY.
Conference at Ottawa Proceeds Behind
Flosed Doors—Definite Accomplish
ment Expected.
A reciprocity conference between repre
sentatives of the United States and of
Canada opened at Ottawa, Ont„ Satur
day. Proceedings were conducted behind
closed doors. The meeting occupied about
two hours. While no announcement was
made, it is understood that the discussion
was of the most general character, involv
ing a review of the commerce of both
countries and a discussion of the dornes
ic industrial situation in each. It is un
derstood that there was, disclosed on both
sides an appreciation of the difficulties
each country might have with some of its
own people in making any substantial tar
iff change. It was pointed out by Do
minion eommisisouers that this wits de
cidedly true in Canada, where thex-e have
recently been from many influential quar
ters strong protests against reciprocity ne
gotiations being entered into on the ground
that Canada was prospering now and it
would be better to let well enough alone.
The United States delegates, it is said,
also made clear that their position was not
without difficulties.
It was tacitly agreed that a genuine
effort would be made to accomplish reci
procity along lines which will be bene
ficial to both countries and which will
not bear oppressively upon any consider
able industry in either country. It is
expected that this week the conference
will enter upon a more precise discussion
of details of possible changes in the direc
tion of reciprocity. There is good feeling
on both sides and a belief that something
definite will be accomplished.
CREWE SUCCEEDS MORLEY.
Other Appointments Show a General
Promotion.
The retirement of Viscount Morley from
the office of secretary of state for India
was announced officially at London last
week. At the same time the following
appointments, approved by King George,
were made known: Viscount Morley to
be lord president of the council in place
of the earl of Beauchamp; the earl of
Crewe, secretary of state for India; Lewis
Harcourt. secretary of state for the colo
nies, in place of the earl of Crewe; the
earl of Beauchamp, first commissioner of
works, in place of Lewis Harcourt.
English Snffrnseta Active.
The suffragets have again become ac
tive, their immediate object being to secure
the passage during the autumn session of
the conciliation bill, bestowing the parlia
mentary vote on those women who at pres
ent have a vote at municipal elections, and
which passed through the initial stages
during the spring session. The women
have been carrying on a general campaign
against the government throughout the
country. As a climax a suffrage! demon
stration week, beginning last Monday, bus
been arranged for London, with a view
to trying to convince the government and
members of Parliament of the earnestness
of suffragets in their determination that
the bill shall be allowed to go through its
further stages.
George it* Be Crowned Jnne 22. te
King George has issued a proclamation
at London fixing the date of the corona
•ion as June 22.
PARLIAMENT IN 1913.
('hlneMf Proteat Reanlta In Advancing
of the Proposed Dnte by Ttto Yeara.
An official decree -was issued at Pekin
Friday announcing that an imperial
Parliament, the first in the history of
China, would be convoked in 1913, This
is a concession on the part of the throne
to the demands of the recently-constituted
Senate and delegations of the provincial
Assemblies, which recently memorialized
the government in behalf of the early con
stitution of a general representative legis
lative body.
The program fixed by the late empress
dowager provided for the assembling of
an imperial Parliament in 1913. Until re
cently the throne had refused to entertain
petitions praying that the date he ad
vanced. Recently the grand council was
ordered to consider the matter and last
Monday Prince Yu I,ang, one of the grand
councilors, declared in the Senate I hat the
entire nation from the highest to the low
est, was agreed upon the necessity of the
early establishment of a general Parlia
ment.
! Friday's decree sot forth that the
| Parliament would be convened in three
1 rears The police went from house to
| house informing the occupants of the edict.
. Presently the dragon banner ami paper
lantern appeared above every door. Beyond
this there was no public manifestation
over the momentous news. The import
ance of the throne’s concession is appre
ciated when it is recalled that the provi
sional Assemblies, the first step toward
modern and popular government In China,
are still in their infancy, and that the
Senate, tile tirNt general body approaching
anything like popular representation, met
fer the first time on October 3 hist. As
lionstituted. the Senate did not promise
much in the na.v of popular legislation as
oue-balf of its -00 members were appointed
by the throne. Nevertheless it took a stand
m favor of an imperial Parliament at an
early date, and met with surprising success.
BRIAND'S NEW CABINET.
Several of the Memhern Have Never
Before Served in .Ministerial Capac
ity.
The cabinet of Premier Briand, which
succeeded the Cleuieneeau ministry on
July 23, 11JU9, unexpectedly; resigned at
Paris last week in consequence of the bit
ter attacks made in the Chamber of Depu
ties upon the government’s-action in sup
pressing the recent railroad’strike, and its
proposed legislation for the avoidance of
similar crisis in ihe future. \\ edne-day
afternoon President Fallieres asked Briand
to form a new ministry, and the latter ac
cepted the task.
A strong republican majority in the
Chamber voted confidence in the govern
ment, but at a meeting of the ministers
dissensions developed, and Briand an
nouiite'd that new ajicl serious problems
had grown out of the~ labor trouble that
must be met by a united ministry. Ac
cordingly lie suggested the retirement of
himself and associates.
M Briand has organized the new French
cabinet as follows:—
Premier nnd minister of the interior-ARlS
linn* dKiaal*.
Minister oi Justice-'THEODORE GIRARD.
Minister of foreign nffnirs-STEPHEN
PIC’HON.
Minister of war—Gen BRL'N.
Minister of mariue—BOLE DE LAPEY
REItE
Minister of public instruction—MAUßlCF*
FAIRE.
Minister of finance— M KLOTZ.
Minister of commerce—JEAN DUPUY.
Minister of agriculture—MAUßlCE RAY-
X A UD.
Minister of colonies—M MOREL.
Minister of labor-LOUIS I.AFFERRE.
Minister of public work—M PEUCH.
M Briand sought to retain M Millerand in
the cabinet on account of his service in
the direction of the railroads, but the for
mer minister of pjiblie works, posts and
telegraphs declined to abandon the doc
trine of compulsory arbitration between
companies and employes, or agree to re
stricting the unionization of public ser
vants. Of the new cabinet 10 members
have never before served in a ministerial
capacity.
THE HONDURAN SITUATION.
Gunboat Yorklown Reaches Amapala
and Relieves the Princeton.
American interests at Amapala, Hon
duras, the next few days will be in the
care of the United States gunboat York-"
town, which reached that port Monday
to relieve the Princeton and to watch
developments in the contention between
President Davila uud Gen Valladares foe
control of the at Amapala. This
information was received at the navy de
partment at Washington Monday from
Comdr Hayes of the Princeton, which now
lias sailed for Panama for coal. Thei
Princeton will return immediatelyvto join
the Yorktown at Amapala, and both ves
sels will remain at the Honduran port
until the situation is past.
Comdr Hayes made no reference to any
change in the conditions at Amapala. The
latest report received at the state depart
ment from United States Minister Mc-
C’reery at Tegucigalpa, said that Gen Yal
ladares was still holding the garrison
and the situation was unchanged. While
the department has received no official
advjces of a spread of Valladares’s re
bellions spirit, ns reported, it was con
sidered by offieials as likely that unrest
was spreading through the republic. They
did not believe that the trouble would ex
tend as a result of sympathy with Val
ladares, but that dissatisfied factions
probably would seize President Davila's
l>rescnt dilemma as an opportunity to fur
ther their own causes.
Gen Jose Valladares, the outlaw com
mandant of the island of Amapala, the
I’acific port of Honduras, still holds the
western entrance to the republic of Hon
duras. He has assumed a ‘‘come-and-take
me” attitude.
PADLOCK BILL GOES TO CHAMBER.
Conservative Press Expects Concnr
reuee of Vatican in Revision of
Concordat.
It is expected that the “padlock bib”
will be promptly passed in the Spanish
Chamber, following its adoption in the
Senate on Friday by a vote of 149 to 58.
It is pointed out in official circles at
Madrid that it is now Rome’s turn to
speak and say whether the negotiations on
the revision of the concordat will be re
sumed. The amendment, limiting the bill
to two years, was adopted in a spirit of
compromise to demonstrate that the gov
ernment is not intransient. The conserva
tive press is pleased that Premier Cu
nalejas has taken his present attitude, amt
sees no reason why the Vatican should, not
resume pourparlers for a permanent law
of associations and a revision of the con
cordat. The papal nuncio has already had
■several interviews with the premier on the
subject.
PRESIDENT OF NICARAGUA.
Estraila to Hold the Position Pro
visionally for Two Years.
Gen Juan J. Estrada will continue as
provisional president of Nicaragua for
two years, receiving the support of the
conservative party. A convention to this
effect was signed at Managua. Nicaragua,
Saturday by Special United States Com
missioner Thomas C. Dawson. Gen Es
trada. Gen Mena, minister of war; Adol
fo Diaz, minister of the interior; Fer
nando Solarzano, minister of public works,
and former President Cardenas.
The New German Budget.
The Nord Deutsche Allegemeiue Zeituug
printed Tuesday at Berlin the details of
the budget for 1912, showing expenditures
of 2.924,945,136 marks, or approximately
$731,236,284. an increase of approximate
ly $12,975,545. 'lhe estimates include for
the army $203,941,844, au increase of
$2,214,155. of which amount $1,976,124
is for additions to the peace footing. The
navy estimate is $112,639,849, au increase
of $4,128,7*82. The budget requires a loau
of $24,438,982 to balance the expenditure
as against $47,962,290 borrowed to balance
the present budget.
A Scene In Brussel..
An extraordinary demonstration oc
curred in the streets at Brussels Tuesday
as King Albert drove from tile palace to j
the palace of the nation to open Pnrlia
ment. A million slips of paper beariug a
demand for universal suffrage stormed the
royal cortege and some heavy packages
of these were thrown at the king himself
by a crowd of socialists, lie was not bit.
As the king opened the parliamentary ses
sion. violent altercations between tlic so
cialists and Catholics began at ouee.
CITIZEN’S FIRST VISIT HERE.
Walter Wiunns of Surrenden Park,
Kent, ling., although past 50 and an
American citizen, first touched the shores
of the United States Sunday, lie came
in on the steamer Cedric frum, Liverpool.
Mr Wfnans is well known, however, in
both England ami the United States as u
breeder of tine horses and a champion rifle
and revolver shot. He has been highly
i successful at the horse shows in London,
i where his entries have won numerous blue
ribbons. It is to exhibit his harness horses
ami jumpers at (lie approaching Madison
Square garden horse show that he lias
now come to America. Mr Winn ns is the
sob of \Yillium L. Wimins of Kerry bar
estate. Baltimore. Mil. He was horn in
Russia and educated at St Petersburg.