Newspaper Page Text
theru -ounrf y'-ot lii ; ii* hue s v* • not, br some hundred thousand a es, run off «s high up the Ohatta boochy as, by the articles of treaty, it should have been. To the evidence adduced by the agent Col. Wales, in confirmation of this opinion, we are abletoaddsoniethingof our own. While raversing that country as one of the o in- the service of the state, jn we were personally assured by its people that the true dividing li ie, running westward between the Creeks and Cheroket;s was consider ably of our rout which was di rect fioin Gites ferry in Gwinnett county, to the Missionary stand on the E'owah; which latter place, accor ding to an observation taken, en pasmnt,. is in latitude 33 deg. 28 minutes. Our informants expressed considerable dis appointment and rejoicing, that they, who conceived themselves within C"cek limits, had been set off* to the CWokees. They had felt much iu- Cp iatude from an apprehension that tVir nation, the Creeks, would ere In.ig be compelled to relinquish al' thsir lan Is to Georgia, in which e- V'-uiT t ! ;cv must needs abandon their and their home: but we?e gntiSed to learrt that had. in the i*«'ie beea left inMie q-iiet possession of both, far within t'>n Cherokre. Yalicn. Statesman and Pat YET WEDNESDAY, MARCH 4, 1529. The progress of emigration is but slow. At f h» present rate, it will be a great whl t ■ e th<t Cherokee Nation is removed.— An) if the prices now pa ; d for improve ri'"nts is continued throughout, it will cost th' United States millions of dollars. It •w II be a dear emigration. The subject is creating an increased interest among our citizens—m«etingsare held in various pla ors, and decided and unanimous opinion is g-»"n that it is not to the interest of the C icrokees to remove to the western wilder ness. A meeting, it appears, was held at Turkey Town, the result of which the reader will see in our present number.— Another washel 1 , a few days ago, at the house of William Hicks, Esq. An ad dress was drawn in Cherokee, which was publlsbct] In uui l<rsi. It is signed oy a committee o'fseventeen persons, viz: three from Hightower, two from Pine Log, one from Oostahnahlee, one from Chutoogedah, two from Dirt-town, three from Springtown and two from Oougillogv. We hope it will not be siid, that these meetings are oc casioned bv improper interferes e of the Chiefs—the Chiefs have had nothing to do with them. The frivol >us cla ; m aI. aneed by G"-Ar gil to a 'art of our Country shows,too man ifs'tiv, the nature of her blasted rights, and th° inconsistency of her proceedings. It appears fro n the siiTTiTiar f the evidence collected by Col. Wal ,to prove that the teal boundary line between the Cherokees an 1 Creeks was as far north as the High To.ver rlv°r, that that evi fence originates fr m the Indians, St is'all hearsay, which woo'' be of lit tie avail in a court of law. The a 1 litional testimony furn'-hed by the editor ofthe Stats.&Pat.(which see in a preceding «obimn) is also of the sam° kind—he heard Indians sav so and so. Now what says the law ofGeorgia ? "No Indian or descendant of Indians, resid'ng w ; th'n the Creek or Cliot-olee Nation of Indians, shall lie a com pel t w tness, o" a party to ar.y suit, to wV<-b a vhiteman is a party." Will it be i that the evidence in question was g ; vrn previous to the passage of the law? The Indians then mete once capable oftell- the truth if ther are not now. Or are the words of the Indian manufactured into truth after passingthe mouth of the white man in the form of a depositien? It ap pears that Indians' testimony will be re ceivc-1 when it is considered to the advan tage of the State, »ven when the law de clares such fstimon-' unavailing in a court of justice. How shall we account for such inconsistencies? We stated in our last, that previous to the establishment oftb • present boundary in» between the Creeks and Cherokees 5 was no other which wns considered 4 I'ne by either pa-'ty. We believe this tfl 1 trictly correct. W« will, how evi, ispert further,tha* the Cherokees ha' l a V.»tt»r fieht to th° country south ofsai.'l Ihie than the Greeks north of il—anil it is not at all unlikely, that i f th" Cherokee' wer« as powerful as th» State of Georgia, & w»re governed "b'- principles,they would now v - attemptingto west the com - ti~* of Carml and Cow»ta from their neigh bors. Why/ Because many of Mr citi- belie re, and no doubt can testify to j.hpt efleci, (hat tjae iq cpyucii a Fort Jackson, on the S.fVi <Uv of j liili, diil agree thai u>. boundary jiuulti j commence ai Vann's Store on the wafers of Ocmiulgee. It was the intention 01 the Cheioiees ai that Council ty agiee mill ihe Creeks on their boundary, winch was then unsettled, and the following, which we copy from a printed document, was com mitted to writing as expressing the agree ' ment made by the parties* The undersigned, head men, chiefs and warriors of the Cherokee & Greek nations, availing themselves of the present happy occasion, of the United States giving peace ind boun daries to the Creek nation; and hav ing' had an amicable interview, at which the subject of their boundaries has been in the most friendly manner discussed, have unanimously agreed, that the following described line shall forever hereafter be acknowledged, by the parties respectively, to be their permanent boundary line, viz: Beginning at a point where Vann's store formerly stood, on thfe wateis of the Oekrnulgee river, this point being well known to the parties respeetive ly; and from thence continued to the Coosa river, crossing the same at the place where the present military .-pad crosses the said river, and draivn from then.-e in a straight line, & cross ing a fork of the Black-warrior river rt little below the o'd town burnt by General Coffee; and in the rime' di rection until It shall inter sect the Chickasaw lands: thence leading to the Flat rock, or old corner boundary, this being known to the CheroVees by the appellation of tlv 'ong leafed pine: for this point, viz: Flat rock, or old corner boundary, reference is had to the convention made and concluded at Washington City, between the.United States and the Cherokees, on the 7th day of Jan uary 1806. The parties respectively request Major General Andrew Jackson to present a certified copy ofUhc above arrangement to their Father,'the Pre sident of the United state 9. Done in the council house at Fort Jackson, the 9th day of August, 1814. The above was, however, merely a ver bal agreement, for it appears that the for malitv of a treaty was not concluded, this having been deferred at the request ol the principal cblßffe, and by the advice of Maj. Gen. Andrew Jackson. But an instrument was drawn,expressing the sentiments of the Cherokees and Creeks on the subject,which we request the reader to peruse attentivel . No intimation is given that either the Ch - rokees or Creeks knew of any boundary line then existing. Be it known and rememlertd. That the,Cherokee and Creek chief's assem bled at Fort Jackson; the first With a view to agree with (he latter on a boundary line dividing the lauds of the two nations: That, "n proposition be ing made by the first to make a defin itive settlement of the boundaries of said the second replied, that they had no objection at some time to settle their boundary with the. first: that in the present distressed state of their nation they could not enter into the business with that consideration and deliberation which' the subject required; ; but that until this could be done they had no objections to the ("herokees settling themselves down on lands whi'h they misht deem to be clearly within their proper bounda ries and that it is their desire to live in amity with the Cherokees, and would ever consider them as their good friends and neighbors, and would*render them all the friendly offices within their power. Done at Fort Jackson, tfie 9th day of August, 1814. The above contains the voluntary and friendly arrangement entered into between the Chiefs of th'e Cherokee nation of Indians, and the Chiefs of the Creek nation, requested to be com mitted to writing and attested by us. Agreeably thereto, the same is com mitted to writing, and attested by us. ANDREW JACKSON, JWrtj. Ge.n. BENJAMIN HAWKINS, - ./Jsrentof I. J). RETURN J. MFTGS, Agent for the Cherokees. JiugusX 9th 1814. The following is an extract of a letter addressed to the Editor, Hated, JAFFREYVTLLE C, N. J4n. 99, 18*29. I write to inform you. thr l those of this place. who havp emigrat ed for the Arknnsas Country have sold their stocks and improvements 'o citizens of the United States These who hrve ho»v hf t* eir■ MpVe* are at this time moving in, and some of themtave already moved and «re m i-. of iliose pieces. • Some 01 the emigratng parly are now lying at I)utiter .s Lauoiug v> ailing tor a tide. H appears thai ihe preceding of this people will be the cause of consider able contusion between the Chero kees and the whites. Our citizens, 1 believe, would \\ ish to take possession of these improvements, if it iveie not for their white neighbors, who think they have a greater right to tljem. We are obliged to jvaji for his communication. Our limits will not allow us to insert but a short extract of it. "The Indian is obliged to look up to the white man for pioiectiou. This protection the white man h..s solemn ly promised to the Indian, in great Councils. The white man is bound to keep the Indian in his arms, to shelter him from all dangers, and the time has come when this promise must be put to the test. It is not for me to soy in what way it will be disposed. All that we can do is to place our confidence in our eldei brother—if his promise is violated we ihiist then be subject to his future proceedings, for power is m his hands. Ifite says to us, you must move west ol tVe Mississippi, we will then, perhaps, ke' obliged to move, but it will noi ie congenial to pur ft elingi—tor the Jfiuntry is not desirable —ii is inhabit ed by a few savage nations of In dians. It the white man wishes to civil ize the Indians, v\hy does he send them to the west? Would a removal thither be civilization? ISo. I would rather be inclined to think that it would be placing them in a more savage, destitute and deplorable con dition. The Indians from time imme morial "Tie Savages, and knew noth ing; about civilization, until they min gled with the whites—all that the In dians know, they have derived from their white brethren. V\ hy is it that an attempt is mode to drive them into darkness again? The cause is , avaricious disposition. The posses sions of the Indians are quite small, and their number* are but insignifi cant, but they dono ~:.u to i>c driv en like a great herd of Antelopes." FROM OCR CORRESPOND!"NT. Washington City, ) Bth Feb. 1829. \ I transmit you by this mail a Doc ument printed' for (lie use of Congress, containing a correspondence between Col. Tlios. L. M Kenney and'HJol. Montgomery on the iof tlie late plan of emigration. 1/ unveils some important points, to whiih v\e have hitherto been kept, in darkness, and perhaps may not be Uf interesting to your readers in the Nation. You will perceive that Captain Rogers was a confidential agent of ihe Secretary of War s, sent out to open our eyes, and to "explain to us the kind of soil, climate-,, and the prospects that avva'ited us it the West." Col. VI Kenney in his letter to the agent, informing him of this confidential plen ipotentiary appointment, &c. says, "much, if not all his success, will de pend nponthe keeping of the object of iiis Visit a Secret, yvu will by no means make it known." A secret a gent th'n with an empty Captain's commission by way of recommenda tion< whose success depended upon se cret management and intrigue! He that hath business with us of either a private or public nature, let him be open, candid and upright in his actions; if he assumes a mysterious character, he becomes at once contemptible, e ven to the poorer class. Captain Ro gers is a man well known in this coun try. and would I cyuld say advantage ously known as a man of integrity and reputation, since a confidential minis ter toour nation. Explanations,* when manufactured by men to subserve private interest, are not likely to ef fect mu h with people who are bat ter able fo make their owncalculations as to their probable happiness in a change of life; and who need not, at this time, great inducements, or zeal ous efforts of secret agents to win h-m over to the enjoyment of true •omfort, w hen offered. Many of the Indian tribes in the North West, yet in a state of heathenish state of ignor ance and degredation, are led impli citly by their #gents; if this has been 'he case with the Cherokees, I am 'i.appy to say it is far from beinj so low. The means adopted in the af "->ir of criers and Spears add noth ing; to the pharactor of the Govern ment, or f would father say of those of iis utiiceis, who, after selecting an a i;ent of their ■choice, and sending him to the nation, enjoining secrecy, thai he might not be known as an agent should, after he had introduced him self, by improper conduct, into a diffi culty, say he was an offi-er of the Government, and as such should be protected. i Col. M Kenney says that it would be a great object for the emigrants to ascend as high up the Arkansas as pos sible, and recommended that flat boats should be built in place of keeled boals on that account. Now did you ever hear of a man before that would prefer a flat to a keeled boat to navi gate upstream, or that would prefer a tin to a brass kettle in which to boil a buffaloe's head? He also says that it is with the chiefs of the Southern In dians, a fixed purpose, by thrcals and otherwise, to keep their people from emigrating. The remedy is "the pres ence of an armed force!! ' Can the Cher okees be included in this paragraph? I presume they are, as they are often blended with other Tribes to their in jury in the public reports. Tho writer is certainly very ignorant of out- condition, or, like the gjeat nabob (M.J| cares too little for rhetoric. At stated periods the Chiefs are created by the people, and if they are displeas ed at them, and but will it, they can turn them out, and reduce them to the ranks of common citizens. For what reasons, then, should the Chiefs be tyrannical, or the people be afraid of their Chiefs How much better would it have been, if the presence of this military force had been recom mended as a remedy for removing in truders from our lauds. Vou will also perceive that the Honorable Secretary entertains an o pinion that a greater portion of the "•poorer Indians are disposed to emi grate." This .opinion I presume is lounded upon Col. M'Kenney's report of the Cherokees (without ever see ing them,) after his visit to the Creeks. It is not to be proven by the fruits of his confidential agent's la bors. 1 am informed that most of those who have enrolled are white men and half breeds, under the prom ise ol getting large sums for their im provements. The poorer .class of people are not so soon led into a spec ulation of this kind. Although the a gent has been guarded against an un necessary waste of a cent of the pub lie money, I cannot but believe that eren/cent that has been, or may be ex pended under the treaty of |he Ark ansas Cherokees. to induce our re moval, is an unnecessary waste of the public money, that might have been applied to much better uses. Sup pose one half of the Indians residing within the limits of Georgia were to emigrate, and paid for their improve ments; would this give to the United States a title to the land? No: If .here were -but 500 citizens left in the country, the title would yet be with them, and the United States must enter into a treaty before their title can be legally extinguished. 9th February. I had the honor of seeing the cele brated Indian Chief Red Jacket, who arrived in the City yesterday. The object of his visit I have not learned. lam sorry to say that he was already intoxicated when I saw him. I believe he has been accom panied by two or three other Indians. Ridge*s Ferry, ) Feb. 22, 1829. \ Mr. BoUDtNOTT, " • Sir—William B. Wofford of Geor gia, I am informed, has started a claim in the legislature of Georgia to a part of our territory, from Sowanny old town, on the Chatahoochy river, Jo the Six's on the Hightower, and down the river to its intersection with the western charter line of Georgia, em bracing all, or nearly all the District of Hightower; and on his motion, Gov. Forsythe is instructed to obtain proofs of the validity of this claim, under the treaty of the'lndian Springs, con cluded with Gen. M'lntosh of the Creek Nation, who ceded the whole of the Creek lands in the chartered limits of Georgia. lam also inform ed that affidavits or depositions are taken from citizens of Georgia and the frontier, to corroborate the claim, as having in their recollection, a treaty concluded by the Cherokees with the Creeks, by which the former surren dcredthe lands embraced by the afore mentioned claim. Be it known, therefore, to said Wofford, who is grossly ignorant of treaty stipulations, and to deponents on this snbjecf, and to all \vh;ai-ft-ftwj ' . ogcern, that a treaty ol boundary »as several years ago concluded by b: idt parties, Oen. Mcintosh being coin inissioiier on the part of the Cretts, and that a copy of it is deposited in the War Department at Washington —that the Indian Spring treaty of Mcintosh, which cost hire his life, is annulled and made void by the subse quent treaty of Washington between the United States and Creeks, and iu that treaty the boundary line between the Creeks and the Cherokees is dis tinctly acknowledged in writing, and j that the United States' surveyors fol lowed the line from Buzzard Roost on the Chattahoochy river towards tie Mouth of Wills Creek on the Coosa River, to the Forty five milie point on said line as provided for by the Treaty |of Washington. For further parties lars I request these claimants to b© undeceived by the Hon. M Phersoir Berrien Senator of Georgia, and Mr. Cobb, who were representing the State of Georgia at the ratification ot" said treaty. JOHN RIDGE. Coosa River, in Turkey Tewjry C. N. 9th February, 1829.' To the Cherokee Public, The undersigned, in behalf of a towi? meeting, composed of the Citizens of Turkey town, take the liberty of ad dressing you through the public Jouiv nal of our Nation, on the subject of emigration to the nest, to which the United States have called their atten tion. The view we take of this meas ure, and the sentiments we will tak» occasion to express, will be simple' and plain, founded on truth as ham'ed down to us by our ancestors. Limit ed in knowledge and possessing but S small share of experience, our apolo* sy in this attempt is in the interest we feel in every thing that concerns the*, well being of our Nation. Our aiv cstors settled in this place at a peri od not now in our recollection. Here was s'acred ground, and on this spot the Council fire blazed with lustre, and hereivcre the dwellings and seats of Kings and our beloved Chiefs!— YVe speak of days when we lived in the hunter's state,, and when our feet were swift in the track of gam*. Gonoi cil Washing!on, after having" smoked the pipe of peace with our Chiefs, sent us word to discontinue the pursuit of ragrant habits, and a dopt those more substantial, and be come cultivators of the soil. His suc cessors pursued, in regard to us. the same policy, and sent to us the same Talk from time to time—that as game was precarious and liable to destruc tion, the bosom of the earth afforded means of subsistence, both irfinite and inexhaustible. But time was not al lowed us to experience the blessings of putting this recommendation to practice by interested wicked /'bite men, who lived near to us, and ftho esteemed as a nuisance, because ther Great Spirit hall placed our habit* tions in a desirable Country, and be cause they themselves had crossed: the Big Water (the Ocean) and had become our neighbors. The bitter cup of adversity was tilled to us oo every side, by our enemies. Our safety was often endangered by in trigue ami misrepresentation of our character to the General Government; and it was not mental or natural disa bility that opposed it self to our ad advancement in civilization, but the obstacles placed in our wayto reach it,. The Indians were represented as incapable of learning the arts of civil ized life, and at the same time, treat ed in the most uncivil manner. They were savagely revengeful, because they had the spirit to resent the mur der of their friends & relations. They were rogues and thieves, because, not knowing the method of legal processes to obtain justice, and if they did, thfip oath decreed to be non-availing, they* retaliated in the same way. They were drunkards, because intoxicating liquors were introduced among them. They were disinclined to the study of books, because some few superficially educated under bad instruction betrayed their countrymen and had set bad examples. They were stubborn, because they loved the land that had been endeared to them as an inherit ance of their fathers. This flood of inconsistency raged with violence over the heads of our Chiefs & swept with its waves,, from under their feet, the earth, for'which they had struggled for ages past. In this way our terri tory diminished, and our inheritance was circumscribed fp its present bounds*