Newspaper Page Text
V E RMONT : T ELEGR A P H . VOL. XII. NO. 114 cters of deathare upon it, it must be chang ed or condemned, tod that in a little time. Bowel of pUy. hear the cry of a soul dis tressed, tad ready to pensn. jriavc.. Tfc Ort BtrtTl of 1S40." Wt belive that in historical accounts of Iht progress of religion in this country, the present glorious revival ol religion, now iDjoyed ia various parts of oor country, will be denominated The Great Revival . of 1310." ZiW Herald. ; ' We agree with the Herald, on the sup position that there is to be a relapse into former indigency, and that this pecu liar! nowerlut work is to have the date of its termination as well as its rise and progress, within the past year. But our ntarts chill at such a supposition and re fuse the admission of its premises .n ad vance. It is true, revivals have in for mer times, declined; true, that a general Tevival has commonly had the date of its rise, progress, and termination, all within the space of a single .year. But must it always be so? Is it, will it necessarily be so"? Where then are cnir cherithed anticipations of the triumphant prevalency of Christ's Kingdom upon earth? We see not, why we should not either give up these hopes; or calculate on the progress ion of a work like the present, in the present age, with undecliningand increas mor cower to the overspreading of the earth with the knowledge of the Lord. And may we pot in reasonable expecta iion, in accordance with the cherished hopes and the glowing, believing, desires of Christian hearts anticipate in the rehires of the militant Church, a record of tho present signal work of Grace, as "The Great Revival commencing in 1840." Morning Star. .... . t . ' 3 L which vou noticed the movements at our "waras me t audience out unaer me cir- late Temperance meeting. I consider it cumstances I could not .yield the floor to rather part certain followed. .Thrae are mv views. I hope 1 threw tnvself UDon my right?. In furthef you will receive them kindly, and make f conversation between the chairman an Temperance meeting. I consiaer it cumstances I could not .yield tne noor to tt partial.' I think you should share a lhose wh h d ajsailed my rights so rudely, of the blame. But your stand at a . J tin meeting I do not think justified what Out of respect - to myself I, for that time, BkftSulSSS? -T""--1 W 0- dh.ioc.ly, before ,b. commenced it that the public may be audience, if he did not acknowledge the rightly iu formed. J, Holcomb. floor to be rightfully mine if I did not Faithful are the wounds cf a friend. Solomon, lnhfnin it in nn nrrlpi-lw manner TI be a kind- . . " . ... j . v.. Let the righteous amite ine; it thall ant t- and let him reprove me ; it shall be an ex cellent oil, which shall not break my head. David. 'The reason I did not introduce myself personally in the remarks which brother Holcomb censures was, I would not seem to attach undue importance to myself, or to my own acts. In the matters-where there was collision between myself and others more particularly, I chose to speak of trans actions rather than of individual persons. But my good friend has felt called upon to censure my course, and in doing it he per- knowledgcd I did; but everything had now come to be so disorderly that he required me to be seated. All this while, and up to this very moment, one or two of my lawless assailants kept the floor. Under these cir cumstances I refused to surrender tny right, keeping myself on my feet. One of the disorderly faction now moved to adjourn. This was seconded by a man occupying an influential station in society and church a station from which a better example ought to have been expected and he immediately Religions Intelligence. Revivals. We have observed, in sev eral exchange papers, remarks ontheipe iial duties of professors during a revival of religion ; such as keeping the heart' keeping the tongue, keeping the conduct Jjpc. Now, we have been in the habit of con sidering these is common duties. If, there fore, any professors are at any time and by any means awakened to a discovery of their own delinquency in any of these par ticulars, it is undoubtedly obligatory upon them to repent and reform without delay. But to urge these duties as belonging to a time of Revival, seems to imply that they cease to beauties, when the Revival is over. Christians ought ever to persuade them selves that it it allowable to forget God'or nis requirements at any time, ll ever there exists special reasons for a parties 4ar vigilance over their thoughts and feel ings and words and conduct, a time of great and general coldness and apathy among professors and neglect of religion among others, is that tune. But. we be Jieve, it is the soundest wisdom to live at all times such a life that the unbelievers may be constrained to confess that Reli gion is an abiding principle, and that it governs its possessor in all his private and social doings. ' , It is the wont philosophy as well as n niguesi wicueaness, to make tne Ke vival of religion around us the Drincinal motive for living "as the grace of God leAcheth." Christian Reflector.. Tho revival interest is increasing very in iicn m mis cuy luowei, iviass.j sever al of the congregations are now reali aing a refreshing from the presence of the Lord. Sabbath and Sabbath evening seem to have been a set time to favor Zion among us. During the day about 4U were oapuxea at uev. xvir sorter's con gregation. In the evening, so far as we can learn, a very great number of anxious souls were found m'several ofthe congre gations in one GO or more in another 70 in another, 150 1 The work is now becoming general. Praise ye the Lord I" Zion s Banner. .uuai me,a50e.ng,.nai3 opinion, more started out with trreat and unbecoming r or less in fauli, which calls on me for a cipitancy, accompanied with other persons fuller statement of the case, and involving of "standing" by which means the meet something of personalities. I do not com- ing was thrown 'into disorder and confus plamof hts personalities. I am less squeam- ion; and they were followed out, as 1 before ish about personalities than some are.- remarked, by many well meaning, innocent . -s-..., ,,..vu.. .uu . uuFe aiways persons, who supposed the meeting to be lo escnew ana avoiu. But m administering broken up, past recovery reDuse or reprooi, i believe it to be highly proper, at times, to say, "thou are the raao." If I have committed a fault, by all means let me stand censured. If I am convinced of having committed an error or done any wrong, it ought certainly to be my privilege, as it is my duty, to acknowledge it. If I am not convinced, ike liberal and candid will allow me to entertain my own opinion, tbe opinions of others to the contrary not withstanding. Such are the principal facts, so far as I am capable of stating.them at the present time. I now claim the privilege of draw ing one or two inferences from them, af ter stating one additional fact, which is this: Up to the present hour, I have not found, or heard of, the individual who denies that the floor was rightfully mine. All I am censured for is, that I did not surrender my rights at the discretion of to abolish, slavery and the slave-trade in the District of Columbia the implied faith of the North and the South to each other in forming' the Constitution and the principles, purposes and prospects of abolition. Excepting the two last pages, (which are devoted to a political panegyr ic upon the character and claims of Will iam Henry Harrison as the Whig candid ate for the Presidency, a panegyric mai is singuiariy inconsistent ana improp er, in such a connection,) it is really a masterly effort in fvor of the cause of immediate emancipation cogent, fearless, eloquent, unanswerable. That a speech of such length, and of such power. should have been allowed to be quietly delivered on the floor of Congress, and to be printed m the National Intelligencer, and thus scattered through the slavehold- ing States, speaks volumes, and is demon strative proof of the mighty change which has taken place in public sentiment on this subject, within the last five years. i?ive yean. ago, that speech could not have, been taade in Congress, except at the imminent peril of life. The free dis cussion of slavery in the southern states, without danger or uproar, comes next and then will come the liberation of the slaves. Air. Slade has won for himself permanent fame, as the first man on the floor of Congress who has dared to vin dicate the principles and measures of American Abolitionists, and to demand the immediate abolition of slavery and the slave-trade in the District of Colum bia. Liberator. .uC. xxuitumuuasnoispecineuwnere- n.Korc; , t r.,ci u j in, or wherefore, he considers I "should U f .u. ur .n , Kara a nnr k kl 11 uo injMWk Wl IWC 1 11 U 1 1 III UII. llllSiUn- share a part of the blame." I apprehend. L . . . J . . r i . . . uersianu 10 De me ffrouna oi Drotner Ho - however, from personal conversation with , . " conio s compiaini. Ltei us now turn and i a ' . . t case, and will indicate ray understanding of loolc at lDe maUeJ' or a moment. All them, at the proper point in the statement of acknowledge that the floor was rightfully the facts. I do not suppose that, when mme' Ot course, then, all must acknowl- brother Holcomb calls on me to "state he edge that my assailants were out of order, matter as it was," he asks for a full report and therefore they were the persons, in- oi alt the proceedings of the meetings in stead of myself, to be required to take their whichltook a part; but lhathe wants a seatS. If they, had kent in thrir nUrM fuller report than I before gave, so far as it lhere wouW faave . nQ d- - . R concerns the matter in which I ought to t , . .. , , it i . - . m, . , ,, i " wiu mai ii innv uc ueiier, somen tne?. "share a nart of the hlame." Thi shall J ' r --. i tn u . tt . n.- l u ;,k .k . u-r..i j lu 1 ."& crv irue. out wno is w nun ukiuuai kuccnuiuc99. auu I . with all the correctness that the distance of 10 oe iue JuuSe 1 VYno myse 1 is to time and other circumstances will now per- decide for tne when it becomes my duty mit. ! Before entering, upon the more full to surrender my rights, and when it is statement of the facts, I must be allowed my duty to hold on vpon them, until 1 am to congratulate myself that neither my J overcome and cloven down by lawless in- faithful friend, nor yet any enemy of my- vasion ? Call me ungenerous, when self or of the cause I advocate, has con- am found to be so, -but do not "blame" tradicted or denied a single statement of me for not sui rendering my rights con mine heretofore made. I he only com plaint is, that, as brother Holcomb "consid ers," it was " rather partial." Whether a fuller statement of the facts will help my opponents, remains to appear. My good brother acknowledges that the stand I took trary to my own convictions of duty. My generosity had been well stretched at the previous meeting, and at the commence ment of this. What I yielded on this score was not a little giving way to this, did "not justify what followed." Mark and nt, and the other individual to speak VERMONT TELEGRAPH. BilANDON, WEDNESDAY, APRIL 8, 1840. Th Telegraph at Home. It has been rumored, ia certain directions, that the Tel- egraph has lost a large proportion of patron igt at home in Brandon and vicinity. For , the satisfaction of those friends whom such ja rumor may have reached, I can, assure i thm : that if the Telegraph fared as well everywhere abroad, as it does at home, there would be less ground of complaint. True, .there is a malignant crusade against it at Shoavej but it is puerile in its effects. Per 4nk me to tay, without indulging any vani if of feeling, that the subscription list, in Brandon and vicinity, has more than doub led it has nearly tripled since my connec tion with it. Furthermore, recently, the rain has been more than the loss. The remaik above, in regard to the state ot things with the Telegraph abroad, is not designed as a general sweeping censure. Uf no raeaps. I hs reference only to cer tain things fd certain places. Much grati tuJe is due to innumerable kind friends in , all directions. Their responses to my re cent call have already commenced. . . J. HcIcomb's Remarks cos-r?0 ED" als0 .my replies to Aent. In the last Tb.'.aph I promised to gire brother Holcomb forth? p hearing this week. 1 have parted his com munication into two separate articles, inas much as it pertained to two distinct sub ject. The Temperance meetrog on which I remarked, and which remarks are the sub jecl of conjpUlnt below, was the former of the two netir!gs recently noticed in the Telf graph. Brother Holcomb t ay: J will now mention one thing which I ditapprore, and that is, the manner Jn that. Now then to the facts in stating which, I will commence with the position occupied by myself at the time the difficulty arose. When the previous meeting was adjourned, the floor was mine, and had been yielded by me for four or five individuals to speak successively. During this time that I was standing by and cheerfully yielding my right, a person not belonging to the Society ntroduced an amendment to an amendment which I had been supporting. The meet ing adjourned with the understanding that the floor was mine at the commencement of the next meeting. At the commencement of the next meeting this amendment from out of the Society was again crowded for ward and allowed to be introduced. The introduction of it occasioned some little sparring, hack and forth, and some excite ment. The mover of it, however, from out of the Society, was permitted to make his speech in its support after whicfi I ob tained the floor with my remarks which would nave been in order, not only at the commencement of this meeting, but some time back in the previous one, and which now occupied from twenty to twenty-fire minutes. I was followed by a member of the Society who made some statements which 'I considered to be erroneous. When I arose to follow and correct him, the chair man requested me to be brief. , I promised I would. At this point while I was occu pying the floor an individual, not belong ing to the Society, arose and interrupted roe, asking that these "long-waisted" by which it was supposed he meant long winded folks to slop and give way to shott-waisted folks." It is proper to re mark here that, up to this moment, there had been no rule in the meeting, as to how long any one should speak, or how often. Each one had been left to eovern hinasel by his own views of propriety, and his own convenience, as to how often he should 8peak, and how long. I remarked to the chairman that I only wanted three minutes and that 1 could not yield the floor. : Anoth er individual now arose and pushed tbe same disorderly, anarch ial measure, viz: that I should be required to yield the floor. The chairman by this time appealed to my courtesy . and generosity, requesting me to be sealed. lie was assured that I had no lack of genero'as feeling towards him or tX manner eneroachrd t)J v. TK occasion e undersigned avails himself of i ion to renew to the Stcrt,r .r.- 11 of the United States, the assuranc, of r distinguished consideration. 1 H- S Fo The Hon. John Forsyth, &c. X" Tbe proceedings in the Senate if.-, ,l - - .44 1 discovered the inconsistency here alluded to. but omitred to notice ir, ia briefly alluding, last week, to this truly remarkable speech. Ed. Tel. General Intelligence. THE BOUNDARY. The following notes have pnssed be tween the British Minister, Mr. Fox, and Mr. Forsyth, our Secretary of State, in re lation to this question. We have omitted a part of the reply of Mr. Forsytbinsert- mg mat only wnicn refers to the position taken by our Government and conse quent danger of hostile collision. Chris tian Watchman. and to the introduction of an exotic amend ment, while I was all the time waiting on the floor. And now that my rights were so rudely assailed, I acknowledge that my generosity was broken. I felt that jt had been extended far enough. After'suffer iog so flagrant an invasion of my rights, it was too late to ask me to be further gen erous at that time. J leave the subject, for the present, with saying that I harbor no ill will towards any one and that I hope not often to be under the necessity of saying so much that savors so strongly of self-defence. P. S. Lest the opponents of Non-Resist ance should take occasion, from what I have now said about holding on upon rights, to taunt the cause of Non-Resistance, allow me to remind them that Non-Uesistants have rights, in common with other human beings; and that there is nothing in their doctrines derogatory to the idea that it be longs to them sometimes to assert them "in words, and protest against their invasion. When their assailants resort to brute force, they expect, of course, to be overcome, and without resistance. Hoofs and horns are arguments which they have nothing to meet. , War. It. would seem that some of the "powers that be" are "crying havoc," and determined to "let slip the dogs of war." When will men learn to be wiser if they contemn the idea of being more christian than to butcher each other? What are those professed ministers of the gospel about, who, in these times of blood, or at any other time, are preaching up the rightfulness of war, under certaiv circumstances? Don't they know that these " certain circumstances " have ac companied every war among men since Ad am 1 Let them point out an exception, or cease the advocacy of such irrational, un christian doctrines. Let it not be expected that wars will cease, while they are advo cated, under any possible circumstances, by those" who profess to be the followers and ministers of the Prince of Peace. Mr. Blade's Speech. Honor, to whom honor. We are indebted to Mr. Slade for a k copy (Q pamphlet form) of his speech on the right of petition the power of Congress Washington, March 13, 1840. The undersigned, her Brittannic Ma- jesty's Envoy Extraordinary and Minis ter rlenipotentiary, has been instructed by his Government to make the following communication to the Secretary of State of the United States, in reference to the boundary negotiation, and the affairs of the disputed territory. Hei Alajesty's Government have had under their consideration the official note addressed to the undersigned by the Sec retary of State of the United States, on the 24th of last December, in reply to a note from the undersigned of the 2d of Novem ber preceding, in which the undersigned protested, in the name of his Government, against the extensive system of accession pursued by the people of the State 0f Maine within the disputed territory, to the prejudice of the rights of Great Britain, and in manifest violation of the provision al agreements entered into between the authorities of the two countries at the be ginning of the last war. Her Majesty's Government have also had their attention directed to the public message transmitted by the Governor of Maine to the Legislature ot the State, on tne ad ot January of the present year. Upon a consideration of the statements contained in these two official documents," her Majesty s Government regret to find that the principal acts of encroachment which were denounced and complained of on the part of Great Britain, so far from being either disproved, or discontinued. or satisfactorily explained by the authori ties of the State of Maine, are, on the con trary persised-in and publicly avowed. Her Majesty's Government have oon sequently instructed the undersigned once more formally to protest against those acts of encroachment and aggression. Her Majesty's Government claim and expect from the good faith of tbe Govern ment of the United States, that the people of Maine shall replace themselves in the situation in which they stood before the agreements of last year were signed; that they shall therefore retire from the valiev ol the St. John, and confine themselves to the valley of the Aroostook; that they shall occupy that valley in a temporary manner only, for the purpose, as agreed upon, of preventing denredations : and that they shall not construct fortifications. nor maKe roads or permanent settlements. Until this ha done by the neoole of th State of Maine, and so long as that people snau persist in me present system of ag grt ssion, her Majesty's Government wil it-ci it lucit uuiy iu mate sucn military arrangements as may be required for the proiecuoo 01 ner majesty's rights. And ner majesty s uovernment deem, it riht J.l It ML : m . . " iu ufcxiare uuu 11 tne result of the unjusti nno. piuwmiuo ui me oiaie 01 Maine should be collision between her Majesty's troops and the people of that State, the tv- spoTtsibilily of all the' consequences that may ensue therefrom, be they what they may, will rest with the people and Gov ernment of the United States. The undersigned has been instructed to add to this communication, that her Ma jesty's Government are only waiting for the detailed report of the British commis sioners recently employed to survey the disputed territory, which report, it was be lieved, jrould be completed and delivered to her Majesty's Government by the end of the present month, in order to transmit to the Government of the United States a reply to. their last proposal upon the'sub jectof the boundary negotiation. The undersigned avails himself of this occasion to renew to the Secretary o State of the United States t,he assurance of his distinguished consideration. The following is the concluding por tion of the answer of Mr. Forsyth : IC as Mr. Fox must admit, the objects of the late agreements were the removal of all military force and the preservation ot the property from ianner spoliations, leaving the possession and jurisdiction as they stood before the State of Maine found itself compelled to act against tne trespass ers, the President cannot but consider that the conduct of the American local author ities strongly and most favorably contrasts wun mat ot tne colonial numoruiesoi ner Majesty's Government. While the one, promptly withdrawing its military force, has confined itself to the use of the small posse, armed as agreed upon, and has done no act not necessary to the accomplish ment of the conventional objects, every measure taken or indicated by the other party, is essentially military in its charac ter, and can be justified only by a well founded appreheosion.that hostilities must ensue. With such feelings and convictions, the President could net see, without painful surprise, the attempt of Mr. Fox, under instructions from his Government, to give to the existing state of things a character not warranted by the friendly disposition of the United States of the conduct of the authorities and people of Maine much more is he surprised to find alleged as a ground for strengthening a military force and preparing for n hostile collision with the unarmed inhabitants of a friendly state. ? l 1 .1 pursuing wimin meir own ooraers, tneir peaceful occupations, or exerting them selves in compliance with their agree ments to protect the property in dispute rom unauinorizea spoliation. The President wishes that he could dis pel the fear that these dark forebodings can be realized. Unless her Maiestv's Government shall forthwith arrest all mil itary interference in the question unlets 11 snau appiy iq tne suoject more deter mined efforts than have hitherto been made to bring the dispute to a certain nnd pacific adjustment, the misfortune predict ed by Mr. Fox in the name of his Gov ernment, may most unfortunately happen. Uut no apprehension of the consequences alluded to by Mr. Fox can be permitted to divert the Government and people of the United b tat es from tbe performance of their duty to the State of Maine. The du ty is a3 simple as it is imperative. The construction which is given by her to the treaty of 1783 has been, again and again, and in the most solemn manner, asserted also by the Federal Government, and must be maintained, unless Maine freely consents to a new boundary, or unless that construction of the treaty is found to be erroneous by the decision of a disinterest ed and independent tribunal, selected by Ihe parties for its final adjustment. The President, on assuming the duties of his station, avowed his determination all other means of negotiation failing, to submit a proposition to the Government of Great Britain to refer the decision of the ques tion once more to a third party. In all the subsequent steps which have been taken upon the subject by his direc tion, he has been actuated by the same spirit. Neither his disposition in the mat ter, nor his opinion as to the propriety of mat course, has undergone any change. Should the fulfilment of his wishes be de feated, either by an unwillingness on the part of her Majesty's Government to meet the offer of the United Slates in the spirit in which it is made, or from adverse cir cumstances of any descriDtion. the Presi dent will, in any event, derive great satis faction from the consciousness that no ef fort on his paTt has been spared to bring the question to an amicable conclusion, and that there has been nothing in the conduct either ot the Govern ment nnrt people of the United States, or of the State of Maine, to justify the employment of her Majesty's forces as indicated by Mr. Fox's letter. The President cannot, under such circumstances, apprehend that the respon sibility for any consequences which may unhappily ensue, will, by the just judg ment of an impartial world, be imputed To the United States. The undersigned avails himself, ccc, &c-" . John Forsyth. To the Hon H. S. Fox, &c. message and corresnondnra . o - "'reco.. crit. al of Commerce : ' r" ret munitaled tn the. Rnrti tr. tU j I1U3 ccscriK. ed bythecorrtspondentoftheN. Y.J 1 01 commerce : The matter seemed U produr citement in the Senate, because the ch acter of the correspondence LaiV'" T T - H. S. Fox. Hon. Johk Forsyth, &c. Mr. Fox to Mr. Forsyth. Washington, March 26, 1840. The undersigned, her Brittanic Majes ty's Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary, has had'the honor to re ceive the official note of yesterday's date, addressed to him by Mr. Forsyth, Secret ry of State of the United States, in reply to a note dated 13th inst., wherein the un dersigned, in conformity with instructions received from his Government, had anew formally protested against the acts of en croachment and aggression which are still persisted in by the armed bands in the employment of-the State of Maine within certain portions "of the disputed territory. it will be the duty of the undersigned immediately to transmit Mr. Forsyth's note to her Majsty's Government in F,nr land ; and until tne statements and prop osition" which it contains shall have re ceived the due consideration of her Majes ty's Government, , the undersigned will not deem it right to add any further r-ply thereto, excepting to refer to, and to re peat, as he now formally and distinctly does, the several declarations which it has from time to lime been his duty to make to the Government of the United States with reference to the existing posture of anairs in the disputed territory, and to re cord his opinion, that an inflexible adher ence to the resolutions that have heen an nounced by her Majesty's Government, for the defence of her Majesty's right?, pending the negotiation of ihe boundary question, offers to ber Majesty! Govern ment the only means of protecting those rights from being in a continually aggra- known for some days. Mr. Williams, of Maine, srsi ! 1. glad the question was thus brought to ' issue. 0 Mr. Davis, of Massachusetts ..ri was now evident that we could terror . no longer. We must assert our rfeh'str abandon them. We should no !nn..i mit that any part 0! 001 territory! dispute "He regretted that we hai em allowed the use cf the rhrase 'J s. ,.! a . 1111 ' .. territory. 1 here was no disnuteal,,. it ; thtre was an intrusion upon it tr t'e British authorities. Mr. Webster expressed his dofn r.- that the two countries were liklrtirV into collision, not on the main r:.f.:j but on intermediate and col lateral Wj. t lt was unfortunate tint howera p:f,j might be the disposition of Etig'snj tf this Government, the n;jrsiiu;i vosue that was likely to fester an J bocorc a nil-tt-r of collision between the inhalihsrr of the two sides of the line. He had, ti:t. fore, endeavored, formerly, io imr n ?); Government with the necessity cf s .! j 1 the question. There was n-j nas-a 1 doubt the sincerity of the of-n reM professions on the part cf the Cn'si G r ernmet.t of a desire to settle :he quvira amicably and justly. But, so long a j1 question was open, it woull be irri'.a irj to the inhabitants on both sidsftheiicc', and would become more and mere J;n gerous every day. This correspondence, earnest as r the tone that it assumed, turned nr.cn tit main question, but on the msuvrr ia which the agreement resnectini? t'., ecru- puion of the territory ad interim hi,l .n fulfilled. These questions would he tr-al tiplied, and become more and more' exas perated and exasperating, the longer ther were left open. It was important to bcia countries to settle, the ulterior qucs:ion. It was necessary that the cJjusi-.ntnt of the question should be urged, as hr as the power of national intercourse wouM per mit. Mr. Williams of Maine, said, for turn. ty-five yeirs, we have heard of th n-l ic opposition of the Uritish governs r,t on this subject; and she would be of :h? same disposition 25 years longer, if r would permit the question to reir.amast is. But the period has arrived when fit can no longer occupy the terriiorv prarf ably. What does she now? Whvs' persists in that occupancy. WouMsrr American citizen consent to this? lit concurred with Mr. Davis that it wis m error to allow that any part of our imb ry was in dispute. There was no tf?vt on the subject till 1814. Grrai fjriiis made the dispute. The moment we ' tempted to bring it to a close s!ie4r ened us with consequences.1 lie anxious to put the question in suli shape that the right to the territory nozi be settled. The time, he repcvtd.hi arrived when Great Britain could no: J. lay the settlement of the question, ZutvL ing that, she took possession of tbeu:r ry and threatened us with conseqjcr.c: He was glad that it was so. H- ipurt that the matter was now in such a that it must be set'.led. Mr. Webster concurred with Lis cv! league, and the gentleman from Main that there was no dispute as t j the tt-rr. :c ry and that we ought not la admit there was any dispute. He was unk ing that the issue should be chanjrd- U did not wish to divert it to a que.noo01 temporary possession ; cud uU;i i':' Government acted, he hoped ibey wou'.i act on the original question. The Message was referred to the Cos mittee on Foreign Affairs, anJ tja thou sand extra topics ordered to be piir.t THE VICTORY WO-Y 1 1 Our revolutionary fathers fojjht years for a principle. The abolition-' of this country have con!er.d.l. f f J long a period, for a word a word, fr"' ever, vital to the success of the anti-sk' ause, and embodying the grcai uy rty and eqtiallily, namrly, inmf? ncipation: and in this Suc,- le rv cause, libert emancioati praised! the victory is won ! ln? islature of Massachusetts has enac:eJ olutions, calling upon Congress tor immediate suppression of slavery u the slave trade in the" District of Go "0' bia." These were parsed in W H of Representatives almost l:r:i:i'0,,' The most strenuous eflTjtt w:-re rnntr u the senate to change their phr.?' !l-'. bntjn vain. A thousand chf rs fJ" ' old Commonwealth 1 It is not ; umph of a party or an association, ' ' Freedom, Huvi'anity, Religion! 'fa dings will fill the slave-driven Soaio" dismay, and cause miMis of I'11.5 ' this country, and across the At- j. thrill with "joy. It is indeed a gr umph, and it has been fairly arU "'J' bly achieved. " . 1 11k uvziomiu 1 c lias a t v r , solves, -expressed in an abolition ,r' boldly and emphatically protesting name of the DeoDble against tbfcons al o Ac, and pronouncing j. sion ing void in its inception, and el no n the people or i.h ing force upon sentativcs." ' rob!y cone! fl.f 'i - u j n r v, rtolvest . u, regret to state. Gov. Morton Ltf append his signature, for reasons 1.