Newspaper Page Text
TIiT3 IMUP VTIUMV, WKDNKS'PAY MOUNINH. MAKCII S-l, J GfiO. THE H ffth LP AND COM M KRCF Af AQENVt A 0 HHNUMSOKFICC. TUtMtuwlngimrU.'uni Aii'iiU ami hitvr liarvH uf luniuili elllces f Tim IUiui.d M th -ni nnMft-tl. in sullnlt fil" arlpllmis nn1 maX oiitiauis fur adviii'llme wiila rr till rsia-raml lo onllncl ami reci'lpl tor Uir ssbici WATK M.KNT Deters II ivIiiik Aiirol aylcji Jiini'ilnii pToaiuni I'rslrle AlUu'.a A, T. Hark H. M. Ml n W.T.liasa I. II, U limy ,,,.K, Hi CTtirnll K. T. 'i k'i li. II, rasscl' Cslv.rt OUrtsvllts , Corslpaiis. ,. raoi DsnlsftJ , ,.. I)M City.. JTorrta lornsy fort Wort):. -QMVM'OU ... Gru.alietH'k, Haraa Hucttilns... JrlTcrnou,... Kossn . Iiii'uitur. JLailonla l.oaivlow,. llarltu ttarnhall.,., McKlnniiY.. Msxla . Mlneola..,. PrU Palestliin.,, Plain ....J'ly II, formal. (Ton, Iiitlllniini (Imi, 8, Itll'VleJ ,,, Claroiica White ,,, Ur, N, J. Duly ,,J, W, IHiiikIh'I'I) (), C. Mellon C, W. lilies A, A, Jaynn J,C, I.li'scninh Hubert I iriiirnn Julin I.)u)d ..1'iui, 0. M, Lynn . ,,, II, N. Woudsnn ,1, M, .Inuia ...J. M. Allriily.'r J, M. Curl. Si',iy A Hinj W.L. Murphy 11, II. Moral u 1). ,1. Kuril .At. U', Jllilillrloll I M. IKwuy tlue-n Illy., ....J. II, llutcliesiiu Bsvoy H. It. Holmrla hemiHii I, H. Hciijsiiilu Terrell T. i:. Ilyrn Wacn,,,.i 1 Mi. K. hhriilcr Waathcrford Wllllkon AUiaiit Wills feint '. I H McKnlo MYNOI'MH CI' D.-4-InIous ol' lb fsiiirsor A-i-muiIm. IReiKirti"! for tint Ju I vcf Ion Newahy t). H. Uutoa, of Urn tiulvuni u nar.J James Fratior vs. Stale. Appeal froia Franklin. ()iinion by Winkler, ). Con viction' for ihnft of a inurn: punishment, - Mven yours Imprisonment. It nmmii that the Nuto made ft sncouil cllurt bel'nro ft eonviu lion wm obtained. The following ilocunumt, pproveil by tho Juilio umi ordered tiled hh a part of tho reeird, it set as a stntomont nt facts! "Hie hill of indictment, No. (10, char! theft of ftbnv maro, tho prnpurty of "W. fl. Graham, on Ilia 27th diiy of August, 1877, Hiid, with oxooption of a difl'oroncn in description as to color, tho present indict Bont and bill in cm No. 0(1 nro tho same in aubsiance, 1 lelouiNiit wa.. pnluu trial tindor Uku bill in caao No. 'Jtl, and tho witness llra- " hum culled to toslify, wbon ho ttnlod that tho niinal charged to liavo boon stolen was u light brown, when the District Attorney nxmestod tho court to permit him to enter a nolle prosequi, which wnsdoiioovorohjeclion of defondant. J. ). Urvgn, witnes) lor dfl tondunt, Huid : '1 biivo known Gmhnm's maro tor snvcral yeurs ; sho 1b a lii;ht brown maro ; it lighted in tho shin when sho sheds; about her hips alio resembles n dark bay ; 1 cull her a lil)t brown.' Approved 'as a itatomeut of fiiclbmid ordered tiled m a part of the record in raid rauso. B. T. Kstes, Judgo of the Fifth judicial district; Slod MovVmber ltl. 1H7U. U. & Yates, District Clerk." From tho above ttnta mont of facU, or .whatovor it is, the proofs of tho appellant's guilt nro not mndo to appear, nor even proof of venuo. Kuversod and remanded. L liurk vs Stato. Appeal from McLen nan. Opinion by White, 1' J. In the mo tion for now trial three several errors nro ' pointed out in tho cxprojsion, " penetration of the person of the fomido by Hint of the male," ustd in tlueo sovurul praraphs iij the itmrKO. Counsel have m t uri;uud the case nor Hied briolV, and we aro left to con jocturo, in a measure, tho full forcoof tho supposed error, the statement in tho motion for now trial being limited by simply asset t ing the error to bo in the lnnguao quoted. If oorrcct in our coniecturo, the objection is that tho charge is not autlicienlly full and explicit in statins positively to tho Jury that to .con stitute rape . o do not think the objections well 'taken, when thq context or whole ot either of the several paragraph objected to Is considered. Our , statute doflnoa rapo. P C art 528 The oliarifti of ttiu court Uihjs the expriusiou "eir- -nal knowledn"." used in tho dominion of the code to characterize tho oll'onse. The words "cHrnul knowltdtje," have a meaning lis well Understood . in common acceptation as any other ordinary i xpression, and aru convorli blo or intorchanireable with tho words sexual iotcrcoui Jm as Used in our 1kiij;uiij;o. McMath s State. 65 Oa., 803 1 Wo are of opinion that the child Sarah Alcliee displayed sutll- o'ent iutolliironco to testify as to tho transac tion, and that the court has not abused the discretion conferred by law in permitting her to testify- Brown vs State, 2ToxCtApp, 116; iil.'OTcxCt App, 286; Ake vs State, t! Tex Ct Ann. 8'.)8.1 The application for con tinuance was properly overruled because of the iiiadnuasimliiy ot tcedcsiroa evulonceanct for wautof diligence to obtain the testimony, and for want ot compliance with tho sixth subdivision of article 660 ol Code Cliiuinal Procedure. Atlirnvd. Uoorre Dorun vs State. Appeal from Na- .varro. Opinion by Clark, J. This is the second appeal prosecmeo. in tins case, tue sains li'iviiig bm'ii fo(iuerly revorsed. Dor an vs Statu, 7 Cl Appeal, 885 Another trial was had in conformity wilb the opinion cited with the same verdict as before. No error anocars from the record, after careful nxami. nation of the numerous assignments of error incorpon ted In the transcript lho charge of the court is a full and correct exposition of the law: the verdict is fully supported bv the evidence, and is correct in form, and clear ly shows a ttndintr, of guilty for the otleusoof murtler tn the nrst degree, witn a?mgnment of a l,'na penalty for that otlense, Noorror, cither ol a substantial or formal nature, ap-po-M in ... nP,i- Affirmed. Louis Baldwin ts the State. Appeal from QoIizkic. upiuion by Wnite, 1 J. The aixth subdivision of the chnrco of the court to the uiry is almost, if not literal! v, a com of the charge of the court wilh regard to the relative weight, character and fict of cir cumstantial and positive nroof when com . pared together, delivered by tho presiding Judge in the case of Monroe Harrison vs the State, decided at the present term. In that case the charge was dissected, and its inher ent defects and errors lully pointed out, both in so far as it wns upon the weight of evi dence, and In so far as it was incoriect As an attempt! enunciation of lh? principles ol law amdicable to those twobranches ur elm,. esof evidur.cn. It is only necessary, on this branch ol in case, to refer for its disposition to the opinion of JuJg Clark in, Harrison I cmo. It whs rror for tlm court to permit the jury to take with them lulo tlioir mom, where they re tired, tho rille gun and balls which had been exhibited and tosti'terl alumtby the witnesses bmiih vs. SlaU-, 42 Texas, 414 Weare fur ther or opinion tnai uie covin errea, as mown by uie third Pill ol execpuons, in not permit. Vina defendant to prove, If he could, his will lugneu to try his shoe in the footprints found on the ground and tuppostd to nave been niadu by Ih" usmmsln, and iiUo that lie n iiieated tha pul'th'S liuving lillil llliller Hl nt In luiiiiMiro the liiirui's .foot and aiiply the inensiiru to tliu Inns tracks supposed o Inn n imi u liimle by tlm Hiillnal ridden bv lb" nir-in to ami I'rniii the plaeii (.f killing. Tim cvlilciicn bi ll g wholly dr. iiinntanlinl, every Tint and clri'Uioftiincii ,i iilmilnli d to illllinl lliitn tliiiliiiiisiicliiiii slinuld liavn bevn per milled In gn to, 4iul bo weighed by, tho Jury, Unversed Hint reiualiileil, T.J. Meyers v, III" Hint", Appeal frnin John. on. ' ipiiilim by Winkler, J, This Is the i rmid conviction of appellant lor murder In (lie llret degree, mi I the cine him been hclor.O . . , .1. I I ,, I u . ,1 I I, 4 . .. iMl.lt llireo uiiie. 'i i i. up , it i l ,pp 1.1 111 thnsfl rkrl will bn fi lll.d IhO hisllTV t'l I Ihe iwrflii'itlun Ami tlm law points gem I .U) llfcllMi il. Much of the law of tlm cunt Inu been aolllcd so that them nro but low iiu tloi.n prntiiiitril bythii ap)ieal, and which ate lil.clv lo ct imi mi anotlmr trial, wlilcli arn niiei sHury in l.n coiiMdnrnd m Ibis npiiiiniii I, As to the errors in-signeil upon tun m l'uiil of tho court ti grunt ariiangn rf venue, In tho iniilioHnnd si til 1 1 it it of I he defnmNiit vailuiis ,i'niiiel aro set out going to xli'iw I lint a tiinl sluiiild not bn had in llm 01111111 v of Johnson, whoro llm pro teclillon hiid lim n coimmuicril, but in the KllliPlll'tlog iillhlaviln out li Is nimbi tn tho tin glo legal ground that tin-in exil in Jnlimniii eniinlv. where the eami liad linen coiuuu'n.'ed and was then pending, so great a prejuilli'ii ncainnt tl'o (leroliilnnl that he could not olitnln u fair and imparlml trial, Krom nn e.vniiiiiiatlnu of llm ovhlenee as net out in the Irmiierllit, we oiiii nut say that nt the lime llm iiiiiiliealion Was heard there nxixlci great n priciiiiicn iigaiust the dcleudiiiita as lo prevent Ins oliuiiiniig a lair unci Impartial trial, The judge in making an Investigation as lo tint fact ol iirrjinlicu appears In linvn pursueil sutmtanlially the pmcticn wlilcli Hail generally obtained and which has since heeu lormulatnil hy an aiiieiiilnient to tlm t .nilo ol Criiiiimil I'roci dure,' (Ait. 6NM) which will obtulii in I'liliirn. In matters ol' this ckariio- tor tho co m t will be loth to Interfere with Dm ruling of llm Judge below unless It bn madn that tho ruling was an abusu of discretion, anil tho riirhls of the Applicant hml been pro jiidiced by his action in tlm premises. Nolan vs. nunc, , n. Appi., ii.id; i ,n i no in vs. tiiaio, 4 Cl. Appl.,267, and cases citi'd After dis posing of points of nvidnui'o raiswl ami the charge ol'tho cniii t In Renernl, and error is r,, nnd. the court sat : It is shown bv the re- Cord that after the trial before the jury had ended, so farasthuoviileiiceand tha clnirgool' the court is cnmeined, and after the jury had retired In charge of the ease to consider ineir voruici, and had boon so In cliurgo of the case from the 2,'ld tot'ia 2ilh of the niontli of.luly, '7'J, k bill of exception nntna that tliu judgo of his own motion had the jury culled into court and asked if t' ey had agreed on a verdict, to which the foreman replied: No; thoy had not, and two of the jury replied that there was no probability of their agreeing, where upon nt the request of counsel for the Mlato tho court ovor objection of tho defendant's counsel, gave tho jury tho following addition al instructions: "You are further instructed in this rase that if you II ml tho defendant ?;ullty or murder In tho nrsi degree umior ino acts and the law, an before given you in charsje, then you will say by your verdict, 'wetholurv tl lit I the defendant guilty of mur der in the llrst degree,' and you will assess his punishment at ileal 11 by hanging, or at con finement in the penitentiary for life, in vour discretion. If you lind him not guilty, vim will simply say so by your verdict. The reasons operating on tlie mind of the court as given in his own language appendes to the bill oroxception. "llio niry ns charged iv the eourt on tho evenini' of July 2ii, 187'J Afternoon, July 25, 18711, the day when the Itovised renal Cotln went into cllect, the court called in tjie jurv and asked the q ilea -lion stated In the bill of exceptions, -and then charged them on tho punishment of murder in the Uisl-degreo as provided m Said I'snal Codo. The uoui't considered tho new code as having gone into client on tho 25i.h of Ju.y, 187U." Tho law in force when the trial commenced was the low of llincaso until it cinlcd. Walker ve. State: 7 Ct. App , 245. The subject is controlled by aru.O of the llnal title of the llnvisod Stat utes, (p. 718.) Reversed nnd remanded. Kobert Mack vs. Mate. Appeal troin Onss. Opinion ol W hite, 1'. J, Upon an extended review of the facts tho court says: With this testimony ot the prosecuting wit- ties', it it stood by lUclf alonn and uncontra dicted, wo do not think defendant (if not entirely justillnblc on self-defense) could eos- sitiiy ite guuiy oi an assault wuu iiuont w murder. If tiie facts slated aro truo lie was ina pulilic road; ho was the assaulted and nut tho tiBsauliing party. Tho objection to the charge of the court is that it was calculated to impress tho jury too prominently wilh the Delict llial in llio opinion oi iiio.iuugo urn Blacks came to or by Martin s house in pur suance 1 1 a conspiracy to Kin nim or uo nun some serious bodily harm. The question ns to whether their iMtnrn by his house wns an accident, and if the snid return was by a road they would naturally follow in going totlieir respective Inmies was not submitted or so in corporated into the cliargo as to relievo it of lialnlitv to crcato the impression indicated. We think the court also orred in excluding ths evidence set out in the bills of excepti.u, as to the declarations of the assaulting party, made at the time, and on tho ground, jiut after tho difficulty occurred. Theso were res gestae, and tended to show tho animus of tho assaulted party in tho transaction, lto versed and remanded. J. W. Webb vs. State. Appealed from Johnson. Opinion by Clark, J. In order to sustain a prosecution for embezzlement against an agent of a private person or cor poration, four distinct propositions of fact must be established in evidence beyond a reasonable doubt: 1. That the defendant was the agent of the person or corporation as alleged, and by tho termsof his amp'oyer was charged with the duty of receiving tho money of his principal. 2. That he did so receive money belonging to his principal. S. That he received il in llio course of his employ ment. 4.' That ho embeutled, misapplied or convert ed to his own use. Leonard vs. State, 7, Ct. App, 417; ex parlo Hedley, 81 Col., 10, Kvidontly tho money received and embezzled must belong to tho principal or employer, and tho identical money received must be that embezzled, for if by transmutation or Changes it loses its ossentnd characteristic as property of tho principal, and bocomes nt any time the property of the agent, it ceases to become the subject of embezzlement. Statutes of ombezzleiuent wore not Intended to provide against evory breach of duty or pecuniary obligation on the part of ugenu and tho Tike toward principals or employers, nor does the law regarding the latter das with such peculiar favor as to provide a criminal remedy for the enforcement of their contracts and the collection of their debts. Theso statutes necessarily require a careful discrimination in their application to the va rious cases that may arise, and it is sometimes difficult to mark out wilh entire precisimi tho line of demarkiition betwoou act punish able as crimes, under these stntute,and .those that may nut be embraced by them, while they may yet present strong cases of breach of ood faith and viola tion of the conlldence roposed in the party guilty of tha breech of trust. The, true tost my"b found in -an application of the four pro positions first above stated to the facts of the particular case, and it either of the in gredients mentioned be found wanting, it may be sattly assumed that the Matutes do not apply. ( ). The Indictment In this case charges the appellant with embei ilcmcnt of eighty-seven dollar ), tho property (.f tie hinder "ilni uli ilmli'g iniiipiiiiy, sp pulliint being the agent ol th roijiiiiiiiiiili, iiiilliorlznl I" receive, and In 1'ni't, leeeivlng said inoney bv virion of hit ngency. it was (Invi liiped in ih" nvi.li'M'" upon ilu trial thai, aiming oilier trniiai lloiis belueeii ll,e purlins, tlm nppelliinl, n I'genl, reo'lveil flvii .owing mai l s I'ioiii the princlpid, nnd w naiilhoi- i.nd, iiulMiln of llm I'olill'.ii'l, In ti'iele 'hem Inr slin k II Im n w lit; lhl lie ilhl, and nib sequeiilly Icielelid Ihesloi l. In lii r i ti I pu I, which was du'liird. '1 !' I'll'd ell'ectof til's aiithni i.illoli, III oppoiilrll to- tliu tm in id tlm nriglnul r.iiiii'act, n mi etseiill.ili,,l,,irl'ii'v IV in llm I'Ogimil employ- iiiini. d I'.:. (' ir.ial chai t;'i lii thmtiiiusof tliu Igei.ry, us r.lli'e'.ed by Mm Malum l tn- l.wlein Uy tho tri ms cl the eniiiincv ti e niliel si.' ", . tn t , Ivn iii navini lit for m elm us only nay and nol's, and tluse nrocee ds nl miles ho wu obligated In turn ...... I,, ll,i, e.inilniliV. Without a Yhl'lll Hon lu llm c.-iiii'iu't mi cirW..l' wort of clllu r ch s (if prni'ii'ts W illi I l...vo prop erly subjected In proicculioii, for, hvtoml qumtinn, llm mm. r.V or notes would I o lbs property (if llm eo'iiipsny and reioivoJ by him by virtue "f "K' '' f illltt change of tlm coiitruot lUrc reunited a dm; ge In 111 it chnnicter of tho proceed received from a salu of tl innchino. Wli'-n ilctenil antuxchaiigcd tin in for hnr.es, by authority, and tlm company reftisel to remivn the horses, to wliuiii did limy bel ;rg'! (Nnl I" llm coiiipiinv, I'm' it ilisinvui'd t'leni. I h i net of sale did lint ('nlistllllto "II cinbiW.lolimiit for that was nnilior.zci,iiiiilhi' I" l ot clmived with llml species of emhe.i'.lu.iieiit. The Iioih.s being llm property of appellant, the proceeds cf their mm were likewise hn pro perly ami imtspicillcally the propellynt the com'punv, nnd by tlm action of llm la'ter it had leuiitto l itself tn thn chnnicter of nil or dinary creililor and held a pomonal demand agaiu'.tthe Hppnllanl for Ihovalun ol 'their iimcliines, Id" his cninmissloii, nnd imcd not have uiilorcrd a suit at law lor Uie iqieoilic liiiiliey received by him upon nmhict the horses. lievcrs' d and reimtinlud. 4 oiiliiilx-li'ucraof A l-ulst. Tlm t'liniuiis-iuimi'S of Appeals rendered the following dioiidoiis Thursday nt tialves ton : Z II John vs S J nnd V 0 Denniiian. Krom Jloiistoii ciuiiil'. 1'ie-hbiig Judge II S Walker did not sit in this case. Itevrrseil and reiiianded. Opinlun by Judge A S Wal- k"V It Iteagiui vs Mary Clnrk. From Kails (Oiintv. lb verscd and loinnnded. Opinion by Judge (llliluu. () A llHgleyetai vs Henry iv vviiiie. rrnm tlrimes coiiniv. Alllrnm.-t. Upinioii hy 1 re siding Judge It S Walker. Mayor's Proclamation. To thn CKixoiiM !' Italian i Whereas tlie I lly I'ouiKill of Dillaa (your ho ortil repierfi ma ' v. a) by a iiiuiiiiiuhih voiu Invlloil liei.or 1 l.iillil lo vlnli. olo- eily, mi l, whu en In pur uhiiim ui s iul i iin s.nl will of your rcireaiila"ea, lu aii.l uncer Ihhi. ue Uoiih, f, a iliu Mnyoro yom eily, iv.niiiioiil Ortinl lli's.imu lo Uii'ini'il Hum , inblreHrul at llm ( IIV ol Mexico, iiiv.ii k nnu In visit IIiiIIhH In tne en nt lu leiuninl ti the Unit, il Maus ini xiove lui, lonsa. No aiiswur ha Imiui icivlv.-l, whHefme we liny nasnoubly lifer Hint ibe Cinniuiilca Una llnH Hot tl- i ll letelVed Iii lie til r ob.'illiic u Hie expresseil will of your repi'cneii( a ' Ivi h, 1 illi piitetieil lu Mrs rs. llnileaoilHwaiiKou, Miln luluideiil of the lima of road iiiu-rvenlng Ibis point and UaiveNiiiii, unit am inuuiy uri n o 10 ntiilif Hint live passage ami compiliiieoliii'y iii'iirU-HpHitro (ixitfiiueil Pi me eily oi liiilus liv iMUll "I Home ills' hull flic 1 ' llH I'lulfll- ili-nls, iii 1'ieli' kind and esiuiieoiia pini.sat in eouvey on IiivIimiIoii eoiiiiolU'ie tenia Itii eliv i) vlsil, tbo w.irbl-icaiwiud vl nor lo our Hi nte ISHW, .Ml m-. i, ttulUi, ivipl, a;, I'll) I', l "Vi'tiry companies, riu "iisiiVi ur dry, an wnll i New, Hinierore, Mayor nr uie euy ol r.r,i ii.'imreiu-ijii, our nil oth'T nrjul.ii1 1 ins us Ml ol nttr i ili.i-it- inlikn'iicli U'nl evervl.iiing in li'i'lr i iiwcr lo iisJVir- Ibe I'lieeutl. u ol 'I n -ml llcil uinl pni ly a lie:ii tv-an i li-isiintb:it w i e nuo lu tlineily ol Paths, sboulii liny d tti'u.inei honor i s wp n ili.-l pres. nee 1 inn gnitille I to s..- loilm'. i lie j; i-. In" sm -tlni'illi. here, (willi.iulai lio.iur-.lilo eMep turn It' mill t: 'up), Is Iii liivor Of ileilill!lg I1 li- t'l I' ll (.!' nt wn ciime us cor I I tl- tlnu. priinise i by n her f ouiheivi cili-'a, v-ii-Ji.l In our StaU'. It ahotlll be a miniv. r.l fv'n p .iisiitu in nil pin t ion I lib nl ie I'ol. 't eit itw i' lo Imve olw rviM Hi-1 no pmita in IV litui r P llnenl pi'ejii'tlnes have mennuU any nl i linuo i aril ellMiliig In ;ll -so ovaiil'ine lowi liN ou who lia-i l"e" so n im. re ui-,.,.u u.s u rci'nwuui- tlVBIll 111 S AlM-'ii'll" p "I'll .1. M llll ltil )'.i M.ivoi. ii.v uim:hy RUSSELL & CO. HOUSE TOWERS and Portublo Saw Mills Parties waMllnn ' anvthliK In pur line will llml it to tlurr aiivMiiuitfi Ui call, ex.m Ine lUHdliluery anil act prl s. e"A liberal itiarmint the trade, oir load louaud furUAMci (.tl-TOMKltg. Atteniafor GINS & MILLS And f t the Ce.brau d Globe Cotton Planter ! The beat In nar All InipilrliH n heo fully an an. ri . Ilrnneli House! Ot7 4'omnn'ree at , Kiillim, Texan W. J, Betterton & Co. REMOVAL! Hiving been hii-ned out at lhr re-il KlUK tliey li .ve oeneil mil, anew nt No. 703 ELM STREET, And aro lullv prepared t" till U onlers as usn d. Tuej luva a dill supply ot WHISKIES. WINES, nrt amimn. Ac. ofve y qT'lltv. to wlilcli lliey m.ite tlie at tuiil.in nl the IU'li. FATJiilNlTB. U-liuiaii, fnllcltor ol Americ. uinl All V,..-U1I I uU'iU, rslll Oll'll, II. bti.iuiss i-iiiie.lKl wild Patents, wli.tlier be fri Uie Haleul vi.lii-e i.r the Court", pruinptly all-noil to. N'n rtiarko uneie unless a lent . arrl .-end (ur elrcular. uniTjii. Imm, kmm I0stlihllhiil .luliiliiu , l7l. 1 In. Actual liusinoHH Trninin .A:ri: ('i-yinth Annual Tuna fioi'n Jaiiunry until d dicir, . i!srn4K:. FIRE INSURANCE ACEWCY. Piirtb aili sli'lnjrllrit-chiss I.N-L'ilANl K will call nil J. J. I'a'iies. Ilisiiramin Aueut, olllee iui:il I its street, Up at-lrs, over I'adgltt Uros. Itu.reienllug the lotion ln(! Colliianli'Bl .tltK'l'iC'tll 4'OUlIK'lllllt'M: Etna, of iiuiiiiiiil. Hartford, " National, . " Ins. Co,, N. A., riilladelphln. FrnnKUn Flro Ina. Co., I'hil. N. Y. Undorwrltor Afiioncy N.y. Ctrman American, New Vorn. Manhattan, ew York. St. Paul F. & M., tt' I'aul, Minn. Torrigii 'ninuii..: Liverpool A. London A Clobe. North Brlttlsh tu Morcantllo. Lancashire ratronage of the public solli'lled J. J. CARNKS, frliix flip Klin eueet. 0. It. MILLER, C.irpcntcr & Builder, Mi Mulu street. D.illllH, TtXUS II ivIiik returned to Pal as to slay, I maybe round In shop ready to do anything In llm building 1 lie, tfl will Ink" one or two unimproved lot u cicliinnt) tor Minn. fi'ilib UOLLOWAY & CO. Wholesale and Ketnll. Dealers In Fruits and Produce, No. 814. Kim St., - - Dallas, Texas. And Agsuts for 'iissouri Cider, Put lip In barrel and kens. J. K. bchnuliUr. All'r.d Pavls .St'liiii-hlor tV WjivIm, Wholesale Grocers I AND llEAl.lil'3 IN D A C C I N C AND TIES, M4 and 111) Kliu St., oor. Lamar, Ptl.l.AS, TKXAS in., l-l HOTEL The fiinilture ami fixtures ot the ell known Kiirnpean Holei, Kml nrih, Texas, lias Ibe laoo- i nude, nnd Is the brat pa Inn b uise lu the 'nro. IIWI8011 lur aniietr. sicanea-. rm iih.1 tlrolnro Hiiilri'ss Kuioi can lintel. Fori iVmtli. Texas, or liiiiulru uf C. K. Hosiner, lias Fitter, Klin Mr,-e , ballaa. Texas mnrtl 3F "O" iva: 3 Of all kinds FOR S5AT--3iS. C. E. HOSMER'S Stam, Bas & W&ts? Piltifig Step, Dallas. Texna. o ojXm Cnstsinurs can Ix assured ofgettlag Brst-class COAL, as heretorore, screened clesn and , delivered, at the lowest market rains. Send in Your Orders, I. G. C1IIL1S, Cornfr l.mnftr ard.lAckntiK Rireets Great IMortlrVestern Sale Stables. Silberstoin & Hirscli Proprietors. HALE STABLE oot of MAIN RTIIKET, cppnelte til (.lulsbtleld House, ltuy nbd il Horses nnd Nines. 200 BROKE PiULES tv ANTED I IH ATIO tl,. 720 Elin Strout, Callao, Tu;;as. December 1SH0. For Catnloguo cuiitalulng full liifoimi.tliui, cull at tho college e, IE. B. LAWrtCNCE, President. I.l KLviS a'lWVasukikwi.it'.MU,Mi V. Shingle Sash and "Ji AT i AT "T( Tl ' CLA12K & BOYD, Proprietors. In now prepareit to furuls.'i nil kUils of Rough & Dressed Lumber, Flooring, Ceiling, Etc At tlie Invn'Hl f rlei a ofleied In the market, luriil. iiluiiB on lint d. r A 1 1 1. in I luinl; r A - II in I minus at nlsbdl at elmriesl notice. ( irdi rs I'l'iun tliu coiintl ) sollullisl a,- it piiunplly illleil Ir.tlllllAMiN .1 0M1 StKXHO'S V5Y EMlllsT l Ol!'8 IX Vi Ivtl.iiTS 'J linuijiliiiiit tlila Sta' is Wo us' an ., Inferior Class of $mUa :ufj Used Hy kolli Slilppris ami I!e;elvcrs. If a inoie reliable nil lele were lulnplid whereby tin" eiinld bono u'fat dlflirelice, luth jar His won d no boiler sail-iltd. Fairbanks & Go's IT AMD COUNTER SCALES, HAV1-: M'fllOU T1IK TKST FOSt Til US 13 31 AS V YEAItS And are, I'ar Excellence, Tho Only Acknowledged Standard' of the World J S. BROWN & CO., Agents, fib'a TWENTY-FIVE C2KT COLUMN. KWTICKN. O'J'li.'li Ailverllsi nii-nts lua be ksiuled lo 8 p. in ., I n. in. IV inti, nnr l.llsincliS i-'lliix tl! and Into Ih" ivu rmnii n 1 UTH ., Il inu inn. I v.iur linn. tine, ii.i',.s, i.nicc lllui" a, 1iukki!'.i', truuks, n... itnivtwt. l.iu'LC'l ami shipl'i-n, ol Ulip'-Chi'il Willi o-ri-ulio elit'Hi, On liol lull tn e-b on H. K lireuter. CnUis lefl a. .limes Murpli) ', 71.",, will bo piulliiuly littniiileo to. il conve.'lint, l"-av nicili "n several days prevluiii). Hales Ivnui li'ids up ward.. "'i mini. ib'C.ISillliin l'OK "tt'.XT. F OK. IWOST New cot lime, next tn corner of llrowder mid onil ai., un 3 inunis ami k Iflieuiwan'i oj premises. lueuiieMl no4 street. """-il F 7li.il! tth.N'1" A dwelllni; witli tare law iisiitK. en t.l'i. a. reel. Imlwei'ii lliicSlol uiid.lc Dm son sli Hood watvl iiouuduut. Ap. iiy to ,H .11 Uei'son st. ioiii'IIi 1JlR KICNT A twe7-tn"ry "riiek bullilli'ir, ' eniil aluln; l-l rnnujanuil b-seineat; el lerti and jpiiiil Willi "iilaoln 1'ir bimiillji; hmiseoi lintel, 8 bl x'lts from tbe siuai. -p-ply in ,) U Davis, Jmrll TTlOIt KKNT 111" Kim ttwt. Adler's old 12 sis or ant , rtiiltHt'lM t'ur orv uooiia. utocerlea. I business. Apply to .Inn Hr"vo- Inir. li I' l , fc'T reel inn vinil jmst'i:i.i.AXt:iN hams. WANTKD- Tuiellor traileforairoiiil borso, a llillilv 11W top bUKKy. luqlllre t 1110 Kim street. "1H,I'i4 W'a'StKU A Hie nn ii to oiiivbbs ibe cnioli', to mil Ills l.nile Speedy Corn Sntiler, llml iveiy turner will buy wli.n he seca li. lall ai. tlie l.'1'iui told liuiis-i. WAVrt.1 r.tTweil' furiirHheiT looiii w tli board, by a -utitleiueii unit lie, nlsmt the llrst nr Ap II or smuirr, not nter five niln tttra walk rrnm f-nntrer lima', aline. Addrsss Hoarib'1' 11. r,.lil nniee, niarlw "11 TA -TKD A Kit iiHttoii In prlvntu finlly, by a wlttte woman, tn iln uvueial-liou-o woiK. lniiibe at Sir. Julius', tmcl. i l nluu saloiiti, Knst IihIIiis. luiirlS FOB HAU:. IOH MAl.K A small white pony. tiitTets ' w.ll iiiuier tho esildle, or in Intriiess. Apply at 8IH Mm at. mar.'4 FUR HALB The best pjliir fruit, conf.c llonnrv and elu-imbir! In 1 1n cliy . Hood trails aav and uiahi . Cull on Johusou, un er ThniiiiiMiii's "Ibeulr., 7. a. Cause, tho 'Ilea Ihi'ii" muslijo to"i)nniBftW." COll HAI.B-Ilesldeno- corner Wood and 1 l aiell street. Apply to railRlil uros. TriOK VALt, Un,, -uua ruiiiiiaiu. aiaei Jj liotthw, (tona neck) very cluwp Apply .lii.'l Main ttrett, at llarber sliep inai'lu jmnKSAI.k A d'rst-nlssstwiMtoiy frame ilwvlllni. enrner Oleauder and Collate sw ; a so a hauilsome nurse inut nn.-xy. Ap ply to Dr. J no T. Dlrt'es, at (Iii MnU t., o on' th-i premises. nulla .ioii r-.Vi.K KleKiint lle-.luence for sale Oneuf ine runs uesiruu e, eiiiiimoiiioii and oonifrtable In liallas or vlclnliy. In quire at Kdllnrlal rooms, Heritltl and umi-ni"el-l umee Ine-iltf PUYeiK'IAX. 111lslClAN AND tui..ll,i.i-l. inUK TON. Olllee, In nrat raUoiml bnX tulld Intf. Besldenee, Corner nnticlut Mid Harwond trn4-ta. nn-rfiiif A'. WAYS BLACK. Mnufactiir--i1,by White House Saloon c PRANK CAUTHORN & CO., Preps. 741 U AlN-ST., Opj. ini.'t Walk Koeps ike One si Vtalsklee, Btscittv, yr nei. An. Ele-rant Kite l.ruibevirj-1 'r.vatlloVlnk. WlMi'lal I'liuiieieil, sliirili HI, P;i mijvim ot Taxaa MIlKII, Doors, THIS Till! Hulcllv li'art rliio Miliiirlcn. tha Msi ninnuriu'. Hi-il linck Prices, luinenslon Tl in Im r fur- Jiiii'JI iO.N K 'AI.KM. i UiJID GALVESTON, TEXAS l n rm MiiMaM'Misw-i'ataii'r.irTTIi roiiF.u. O D tO Phelan & Go's Ihe Red Shop on Ross Avenue, Dallas, for BLACKSSV2ITS.C, fm lie et. 3ci :V oi li AND AKTIWIAJf.WELL. TOSH., 8mokeStacks, Brachln8, Tanks, Shutters, Hotfr, Boiler Material Etc. PHELAM & CO. P. O. Bok 338 DALLAS EI'S HOTEL! Cor. Main anil Murphy sts. East of - tho Tost Cilice. ALFRED KI'T, Prop. un, - European EATSS Slt.L'lf Meal. Heils I'er l)jy ArronimodnlloiiS nnd I'nre roiinl lo nnv In llieclly. This llni.-l n III liri ly beeiilnraoil nnd will Imve nil accnoi liiodutiiiK inpneily rurlinnsneNla. 1IH Iron Works