Newspaper Page Text
Y01" LV...N?- IT.?i.M NEW -YORK, IRI?AV, APRIL ? *??? *<2.."..'1,L5 J$S?? <?*---?'??rT'-ili?; ffl....j;.?_..ffAi-gt , 1895. -TWELVE PAGES. PRICE THREE CENTS NO HELP F()U NICARAGUA CLEVELAND CHANGES FRONT. HL* rSTOEfl BE?CRETARY GRESHASTS IN THNTION T' ? PRe ?test. ESGLASD'S UAS'D LEFTFBKE ATCOBTSTO. MAR.NES TO BE LANDED THERE THIS MORN IN?",. FOR POME VNKNr'.AlNiir? REASON THE PRI'SI DENT ril.VN'iKS MIS MIXT?. AM? WILL AI.I/OVV LORD KIMBERLBT TO c.vr.RY m'T HIS PRO? GRAMM!-; WITHOCT lNTT-T.rKr.KV'E-13 HI pi.aying a DREPKR GAME, WHI??H .*>:ay RESULT ix niv. arro GATION Or THB t"*LATTON RVI.wfr TUFAT*,' [BT TEI.nORAril TO THE TRIBUNE.] YA'ashinprton, April 2.'.?Early to-morrow morn Irt* ?a forro of Englis'i marln?-s will 1.?=- landed on N.''iir?Teru<Tn soil with the av ?wed purpose ?f ex sctlng th?? enforcement o? the t?-r:r.s of th" British ultimatum. Thor?-? is but one ?**ontln,#en<*y to arise that will prevent Admiral Btephenson '.: m arrylng out this programme. That is that Nicaragua will take from her Treasury or 01 n Is possible that he mai I ' ' n whlc*? "? now made poasible foi th? fli : time In many yoars. Wh? ther he la equal I ? the ? mergew y, whether he ?vil! embrace the opportunity and reap th<* ?T.'iit which many of his predecessors have l need f -, remains to be ? T ! theory is now advan.1 tint the President lia? refi from carrying ont th.- vigorous c ?Urse a I by Secretary Greshan - ' t to a bolder, mr.i-e effectual ? bringing England to tf-niis and for all tlm? settling t?." question of her rights in Nicaragua, DOES HE BEE HI? 0PPORTUX1TT? Accordinir to the statement of some of Mr Cleveland's friends, the programme Is to permit England t,-? land marines at Corlnto and to take eh irge ? f the i wl m-h use an I other a ?vern ment buiidm*:? there. The day that Great Britain does this abe in-' violated Article i of the Clayton-Bulwer treaty. Thai article pro? vides? In effect that neither the United States nor Great Britain win ever .Men "r maintain any exclusive control over the Ni aragua Canal, .a. i that n?-ither country win o? cupy, fort fy, i oloi lie or assume ?>r exercise any ?'? omii I - or ? trol over Nicara?-iia or any part of i Taking 'her:'* df the territory and revenues of tin '*"l iblic ;it CArint.. Is "a?siimlnp and ext*rclslng dominion ar-.'i control over" thai part <jf Nloaraa?ia. It would "tily be n?x*et?sary for the President t? give th?? required six nu ? ?bW notice to Engl anal th?* treaty which haa long caused eml ir raaament to this country would l"' at an end and th" Administr?t! n would have m m ?< victory in American diplomacy of whl ii it might PRINCIPAL STREET OP COR1NTO. ?wlFe spour? an?1 turn over to the Bag] mamier $75,000 in r?-?!1 t ? saUsfy Btith ar.d compensate her subjects for alleged rani K.s?.s, It is extremely Improbable th ragua has or can rais?? this sum i :' tnon< Is it likely that the President of the ! and his ?advlsera feel Inclinad to take this of the National rerenues to satisfy an < ?Judgment without the Juatioe of the dema jr.r* been pass?e] upon by b i tnrtpetent ? biassed jury. The chan.es ere, th?. r-fore, ; mirai Stephens..n will , arry out his thre before noon to-morrow th? dtlxensof Corl be subjected to the humiliation of s??ein public bui.dir.gs and Streets patr.-.ll?--d by Hrltlsh marines, with th" caiitnin of the Arthur lnstail"d as the Govern'r of this i of Nicaragua. MIORT MAKES RIGHT, HEU POU This is the programme ? utltoed by Lore be '?:?'. It will be farri?--d out with th<? the rf-ss and firmrK??s clOArscterlstlc of the I Ntearatfua if? *r?o helpless to protest or te : - ?-ranee. She mus? a ?epl the calmly as p-isslble. Th.- feels that NI? Is weak and ?England powerful, an ! tv il tl a dec-id'-'1, question as to the Justice and rl the enforcement ?f '?' ' have Ingly cut no figure In Lord Klmberley'a Might is right with England In this Im ?he Is consistently following a bus maintained in th : oth r sma : , >?s countries. It la :. dent th ; ? -rtamme is to take o ntrol f the i Nlcaragus which arete ? I it Corlnto, Inform?e] persona will see beneath the bi and realize that England d< ea r.-.t Intend t? h'-r??. Her avowed purpose, that she do?? <? fit mpl ite the o tcupatlon of NI ragua I ; long perl d. may satlsf* Mr Bayard, who hi peatedly written home thai Her Majeaty's ajtrnmernt li honest snd sincere in ?saying tha Is merely exacting redress auth< rlsed ander 1 national law for an affront *< elved. but '< lesa i''.'iFFr-d will vp-w the situation more Mrl? and ent?ertain mu :. i incern at the tun affali Naturally, under th" cl-reumstancea i questions arise: What has the Administra done, and what furih-r Bteps will It tl What of the boasted dcrt?-minau??n thai l land shall land no military or naval forcr N: ?araguan ?soil? it was ann ?unoed auth tailvely in these dlspatehes a few hlghts that the Administration had definitely ded en thr?-e points in the Nicaraguan controve and was in doubt as to two others. On" of points fixed upon was thai n?. royal marl should be landed at ('-?rlnto. But England land an arm?-! force at th?? port in quest! How, then, ?an the fact he r?--.on< ?I'd with annoajrx'-.l ?policy? On this point there is mi speculation, but little definite Information. can he said that from the time it her am?? i parent that England would enforce 1 er u matum, regardless of any course on the pi of Nicaragua exc?epl the ?actual prompt payme of x~~,.<i')ii, ?Secretary Qresham'a i r ?gramme Y be-on that this country should vigorously pi test against the leisure or cession of ?Nlcai guan territory to England, and that the Ian lng of a I'.ritish force in the- Republic was to c-.nstru'-d as an a?-t in violation ?if th" M'.nr Doctrine. According t?? the Stories Which '"' from well'lnformed persona the ?Secietary toe It for grant?-d that his attitude In the matt was in harmony with the vfows "f the Prei dt-nt. There Is ?rood grounds for ?believing th, sue-h v.'as the ?case, until within th" last fe ?lav : ORESHAM'l PLAN OVERRULED. It is apparent, th?-ref(,r?>, that the Preside! bas changed bis mind for unknown reason fand in doing M has for'-?"l th<- H'-e-re-tary < Htate to modify his tone. There seem no ?lout that Mr. O?? ;h:tn was j.t ? par?-?! t., ?all ESnfl land t" ai'-ount as so..n as it Iwcainc eertaii that she whs to ?acquire* territory In Nice ragua by any ]?r??' ??? '?Iriv,'. or that -he woul lan-1 treaops t?, enf?.!-?.- t.? t el'-tnan-l for an ID d-Minify, in f!(? t, and the strif??ment is ni'i'V with emphasis, Lord Klmb?-rl??y had b"?'n marte acquaint?-?! with this view of the Stat?? Deptirt n.? nt. n?>t within the lost few ?lays, but on ar ?arlbT <x*<-asl?,n, in < onn?'ctl'?n with Nh-ar.-igu.'i u atTalrs. What has ?aiis?"l this change of front e.n th? Part of th<- President? II.a* he In < OOte-iii|i!atl'.*i another and bett?-r peOlfcy? In view <>t the cir e-umf-ianrcs, ? ?,n.?M.-rinar what Mr. Cleveland has aal?! and done- ?n the past, tb>STe l.i natural h?sita? tion In according to him credit for wlseiom or far ?lghtedneis In diplomatic questions. And yit It ?ve;: boast. Does th" President aee hit sppor tunity? Will h" take advantage of It? 1? A possible that this la his programme, in?1 ti u f r thit reason h" has looked with 11 fa r upi?n the p li'-y advised by Secretar*, Or? Should the facta prove otherwise, there ap pears to be no excusi for Inactl in at I England's course In Nicaragua, while posstbl* Justified by International law, i in leflanc? th-- expressed v..-\.s . t this c untry, .' actually In vlolatl n of the Monroe D strictly construed, if now, whei ? aslon i Is ripe fa.r a declaration that th" Clayton-U treaty i? abrogated, no such d?clarai th?- policy of th" Administration is nothli -; i hort of puslllanlir, m?. TIi"Sr: ASSURANCEfl I-'Kom ENGLAND. Mush is said In relation to assurai i which the Administration has :?? elved from Ki a . i. >ut l hat country's intent ragua Mm I dally the ? r? sa has - say ab ml t!.?-?-<? aasuianees. Il il Mi Bayard haa re ???? ? ? Infoi mation to ! : ta: > i ;?? ' ha m on th? < ; case, State 1 ?epai nt officials are ?1 ; in? tii" seer? Th a-h ich hi sen i Lord Kim the Mos'i i-., i : rva ? ns Lord Kimtiei I ...... i: , .".',. ? t . ;:. ?:??? ise its aui , ?-ii' l. . there ? ? I If l v nisi . relying n I ? Hit) that it ? I:-- enl hisl : > furnishes Britain givlni she has ?met nenl Ilium In polnl ? ? ? ? revenues I \ far buck a Mi :.;. Bayard ? I ? ? ? ?> from British In ? I reported t i Sei i "tai f tJreshai was the language ol J. ... ? No protectorate form : ? ? ,n nal m- o.f ;.i '??? orate, : -, i by British G verni Tais messaga i*^ free fi m ? ?-. i but no on? had dreamed ol England ? ? ca.-'', in-, a ; i I ?''-? o* ??. NI aragua. [I - , : .i' I that s.'i" would Insist upon hei alle*'? : rights in the Mosquito Reservation TI j tabllshment of a protectoral? n i tin.", if tins country allows It. In a loti I the State Department a few days latei Mr. ! Bayard amplified h;s dispatch, and pi Ini I with I undisguised pride to occurrences a l i i ! ? he was Si retary of St ite. Vlrl ually the : ? ? i argument In favor of the trusi vorthln? English promises. Again, mi November it lai t, th?- American Ambassador recurs to the atti? tude of England About this lime the qui - lion was becoming one of Importance .is to what condition England placed upon her c 'ii st-nt that Nicaragua could assum.ntrol over i the Mosquit.untry. Mr. Bayard said, speak* ? iniT of LtordiTgClmteriey'i statements ; i him: His Lordship desires explicitly to have 11 ui ; stood that any action In the ? ?y ol obu Inln? re ! ?ir.-?.-; from Nicaraj-ua which II- i MaJ? ty'a Govern I in.nt may hereafter tie id** la ne i ?sari In ta- pri m t laea ,.? ..holly unconnert? I with any poatlcal or ! c ii v?'A.????? al qusi tlon tou !:?' er I vatlon, but la simply a pror rdiw* m th? .-,?? ?.-., i ; of International law to obtain satlsfaci m foi an i affront. I LORD KIMI ERLEY'S [NTE.VTIONS SHOWN Tais was the flrsl Intimation the State De partmenl had that England would lemand "sat i Isfactlon" for an "affront." J; was the " ' v, which Mr. Bayard refem I in ai il er dis . pal n, sayl L ird Kii-.i. ri? y h ia inf. rmi I i ...-?? Instructions tu the Bi t>-r al ;. .i-.i.-,.., rei pi ? ting ?'? numb? i ol deer? ha ? bei u lately , : ..: c. .. ;.. i . i en I Ing the ? ,... ? '?? ?'? ' ?? i ?i,., ? ... 'i I'rltlsh pi ? -i ?? ,. - : ; re by Senor I . th? ?!? - crees ha?'? not beei accepted bj '.'?? iliitiah Govt-rn I.-,. i.i. but ii i i III catioi : ' i. i me .i is 111.? Lordship ; tiled b) the British Minist? : In r that th? - .,,?.,-.?..; ,.t these -I-- re? . Bntiah Interest? n Nicaragua an?l Urn du under in- Treat) of Managua an?l the \ . award ?!" r< und? r, shoul i n il ; onsldered ... .-...? but to be auspi n?i< >1 until the iu< i 'l?.|it? of Hatch's arrest :? i ? :? i mm.a."ii. 'i'li dispatch Indicates cica y. s hi k v . c ???.. -.?? ? . i these Ii pal ? ; ??'; !-' IK nib? . ley gave up :n the Mo rjuli ? Res? rvatl m mend? ing to r? n .. '. hold n ?mother Nicaragua, u-??ik the arrest ?if i.'onsul i: at? an excuse. To-morrow tl I ! me Into effect. NICARAGUA N' 'T LIKELY TO PAT. HIIK ii:i.|-i:i;s THAT IHK BRITISH BI10CLO ??? ,?! i-Y txnu.vnv Washington, April -'?- oiu ?ni ?vdvlcea from Managua Indictnta thai tb? Nlcarnguan Oovern menl win probably not pay the .?"demnlty, but will allow Hi.- British totoao to occupy Corlnl ?. The N...H-.-iKUiiii Minister, Dr. Q?*?t?man, ,. ,-? s-v.-ral hours at th.- ritat- I '-pariii:? nt In tl... early rnornlng to-day, hoping W obtain from ?Secretary (ireshum sonnt further Information Continued on tliJrU p??*. lySTASTLl hlLLkW BT Tilt: TBOLLBT. THE wt? ' ' Tr-M THE LIFE ?ait "K a l.lTTl.F CHILD IN ? I???'"?' ORAKOK. A young child waa In lUntly l?lleed on the (Jon ted Tr ictlo . C mpsny'a lln ? in We at Orange las) evening The accident tiapi ?about 5:45 o'clock, In V*Uley k .;??i. near the ? w ? t. The ?? Ictlm was little Pletro Christlai o the three year old child of Al ' ?; i.,,:,-.. ? ?' Whlte-sl The lad .??-eme oui ? ' Whit,-.-:? , with hi- younger brother to rrosa Vallev Road The little brother hung h it* and iped. i -j. ; r. ? -tar!"! ftyward, not ota car .v..'?.omlhg ai >ng at tne usual high rsl of s] d \s he start, ! forward he atumbled II headlong, with hii head on the rail. Ills he ,i l was i ' mall thai it paMed under the I? nder with ?ut ?trlkli - It. The wheH struck ,,' i aquarely under the chin, and literally split hi- head In te The car was stopped and the ?body was taken Into Bretxfeld'a drug atore and later tea the n rgue Th <? P ?or mother of the Isoy was almost i raxy. The motorman, Richard Conroy, of Newark, and the conductor, Nelson Oroas, of Wo. II Dodd-at., Orange wen arrested by Captain Ramford of tl..- W*est Orange (jollce, and held n a harge of manslaughter County Physician Washington win ?probably bold an toq-wst I // ??; DEI E sa: or nrun a s i. ins attoi:n:v tp.vi\-?i TO COHHWCT Till* REV. I i: oil ' N WITH '1 HE Mi P.DE? 0? ?ATtsa I.AMOXT. ?Sen Pranclsco, Vprll -'? ?nteres! in the Durrani case continues inabaterd The mlcrt-tsoope hss ah n that a supposed \*arnl h tain on th" door ?-rasing of the R Mi '... n'a i ? *;at raa?t I ? ? i '. p? , , of Co 'i"-- ? '"'.'?? ??. ?Id last nlagttl . :.. n i nothing to esi ibllsh Dun met : thai ! i att, i cture ? n the afternoon ,.' ?Vprll i ?urranl always to? k n ?tea al I? antl ??? ? ? rig th was In itn.it demand. It canr...t no I r is ? it her In : er, Cheney monstral , ;?-...., nt to f a lecture v ' he i: n rn.i' ' ', ? ? ? ' | ? ?\ h, of Alai called ut Polir Ueailqtiui lent and ma le a ! Mil ?= . ? ? . > ? v? y car, he them tant witness fi r the ; emphi ?rt-st that he was ,..-.-. I >r, . ribson was to 1 I i n I . He a, i . ? ? ? wttne ss flnallj l?s i ; ? f | it he i- quest , \, ???!?..; ? ? ? . r, which wer? In th? ne? 1 wer? .. h ??.. .Idftit I Ihat the : ? ? . nt ti -, ' . ? ? I ley i he .!? ;? n??e tut .'.'? ; tifled thai ey wtrt kept In a ?Jraw??i , ? ? . i to I urrh B I I noi pon s ? - . thr? ?ars. Ha wa? aal . Kmaniiel a'hurrh : ? hat it was Va to hia t ..'? ? ! i II e' .?. ? i- . ? ? ? y % ..- ?at In ?> -m KASSA.S 1.1 il FA U IA LEAGUE, on:: ?BET AT T ?PI K v v " ? ? ...a. Kan., ' - - " ?? . - Met 1 .? ?.- ? ? ? er I a i:h an itte let ? ' . ., . . over a I for the pi i.v. H. ? i ?.' .v ? ;. ?? 1 ).?. ; ? . ? ? ; : . the? | r '! i ATAXFoRTt ?'?.'?. r.e/rr will ?ror be ci.oaeo ? : a . : ?????.?'?.-. I | ...... ? , ? ? ? . ? ? Ith n| ? ? .... ? ' ? furl I ':???! lip .e ' n.- . ? . : 1 : re lid be re.il? , but II ? . .1 VVIIi on, ?.? ho i Mi ? Bt in ? ? ? 1er la i ? ? ? ? . be ?!.,?; i mat what ro make, ' it even tenai . - : !??-..??? ? ? ? ? ' : ???'?.,, ? ? ? Bl .-.(-. . ? ,??-, ta, e rame? i;. ne *? on June l". if the foi I estate M'<ni:l"'A SCI1 /'"/*.' Ft F ATI' AXD DAMAGES > 'h. ? ? ' Tl ? re waa lile 1 |?a lay ?vi'h ., m . t?-r ?? ? ineerj of lh?te i nlt?r-d States fourl proof of claim by Kelson Morrii sgalnsl the Distill ? ? Unte ? ' ?mpanj to the amouni ?.f '....' 123 Thl . i", Ih? m. ? ?.'.' aire a ly ue?l f?.r in ., common law 'it it Include? je:. :o:., claimed iue a rebate bushels >.f slop feed In WM, and a ted d image I r t allure to furnish lui ni feed foi ittle as ?'?? i ontraci Tii" I'..... r ill? I thin afternoon reiterate th? state ? I thai .1 it Ore, hut, es lafesldeni of tl.itnpany, i 11.1? i. : i- .1 with '.; .n ? . to ihe extent "f a seventh lnterc?i ? FOBBSTS An\?\- ox I nil: IS nir IfOBTHWBST raukee, April 2 \ dispatch from Chlppewa i ? "The lia||y Xews" "Word n i re elve I her to lay thai forest dr.--? ? '?? ?'? vicinity of ?Phillips, sj I It i. .?v lo ?1 ., if ths ? ?? ? ? ' r? ?? ti will i iffer ;a : . -| . . ..,,,,; .... ,,? prenl at.la/..-, an i i;,,. i, ..n. iti , |ei ,i?: i farm? r ire ni?iii to i ? ; : ? ? ere were everal ; n mho i ? it yesterday, ai lhat t! tires will abate The ? ? ?? ? the woo I? m I n?. ? are ml ?.. ? foi the tu?- t ? l?r, v up .i?. I'n'i ? ? rain omet?, the tire ??HI cer reate nlatl .. li." , . .,..?? . ' l';..'i ? ).i\. n. i .. .n organised effort t.. keep the il mi. - from tntei ?. Ill the Are appll the ' Itj .il'.i I? n.... i. ? i ?cot re e ?!?? for Im? i mediate aetl m, an I, ??.n ne I to the ill?a*ler to 1 lili ? lar I lannaer, th ?sill bee ly I ig up I .... i ?..! ? ? api i ??! . ha? m i ? aboui , ?.in ter of > mi.? ell tant, .mi n I? burning alowl) toward the If s In i prit rb up the n une? maj i,. , ?rrli i Into the town." FOROED XOTBS or BoXAXXA MILLIOXAIBBS ;** it ?Vprll ? v foi .;.-.i note for ' ?? " slftne -I by th? late millionaire, J. C. Flood, i by W. vv Con oran, o| vv a ibington Art Galietr)' fame, haa com? t., light her??. The .i?- i ronouni "l perf, i and the note ????I to have b en forg? d bj s man In Xe ??. - *, "t k who !" ...m.' Htroud Btarbti I He I? believed to be ' ?? ne i an who made .1 ?' Pair's ? -???, e ndorsed by Iceland Btan CABIXl I mi n BBS DIXB WITH F A EMBER1 01in ?Philadelphia, April S ?Secretary Lmmaol ... | s.'i-. tarj ii.rir.-rt arrived here this sftei-itaMn fr.un Washington, snd this evening attended a dinner ?.f tin- Pstrmers' ilub it the country t .:.... ,,f ?Clement A. ilt1?r .en, i i?-.-ll??it "f th" [nt?-rii.,i|,,tm| Xavlga :?.... ? '..,,,,.,? ? Th. h*. i ,- -. i ? ? ? r m ' i 'lui. ,.. ...,n., ., . ? . this illy. AN OFFER OF SETTLEMENT. PROPOSITION TO THF. CREDITORS OF, i:. s. JAFPRAT ?*?? CO. ASKED TO ACCEPT SEVENTT FIVE I I'M.? ON THE DOLLAR I-": sii-.iLiTV OF THE REOR? GANIZATION ?if tiii: WELL KN'iiU'N DRTOOOI34 I'lllM. A prop. sin..n has I'.-.ti made t" the creditors <?' \: 8. Jaffra) .? Co. for a settlement on a ba . :;. cents on ; ." dollar. Circulars to that effect have i?""ii s?'nt t" th?- creditors. Ti." first cir? cular was sent on Wednesday, and is a? follows: Dear Sus: "fou are no doubt airare of th.- fact thai ;h" tirm ot '??. g. Jaffray .t- Co, was dissolve?! and receivers appointed "f Its property bi order "i i lu.- Supreme Couri A this State, dated Msreh ?St, We understand that ?? circular has been re? ceived by certain ? i * -, i i r ? ? r.-? offering i" purchase :?m- sgalnsi the ?-all firm. This circulai ?? ,, lasued without ."ir knowledge, consent or appr.-..il. \\ - take H ;>-r granted that you .tr-- familiar with tl,.. dels) .;??: ,-. that usually and Inevitably .-,'ii nd tii- winding up a sn ol l an I ext? n iv< I .-. u?* at the hands >( n elvers, As representing the ?? f the late Edward 8. Jaffray, for many years ?enlor metnbei if thi tirm >?r E, s Jaffray tt Co., ire hereby offer t? purchase an) and all claims against the said ilnn f.?r seventy-ftve per cent (T? I ol face value, lesa trade discount. The detail i.. ted th? a Ith s ill be attended to by M Mill.r .t- I'hllllps, N.a m N'assau at . and M< ?-i. ?-. .?i I.. ..--.. No. 2X0 llroadway. I lit? .Itv. I yours very truly, .1 B. l\ WOODKIKF, !?'. \Y. .1. HIRST, Kxt a tors, Th" second, signed by Prank .t Einstein and , Miller .v Phillips, was lenl oui y? l rdaj Dear Blrs I* have already been Informed, i?, ha? ?? i ??? n ? mpl -i ? A : ? the e> ml ira ? I the '. ite Edward 9. Jaffray, forme'rl) the senior of the firm .-? Jaffr.ij .-. Co ? ? ? it. ! oith.-r l.y letter ..r m pel on, for the l irpo ol i ttif-ment of the affali 1 of the late tirm ol i: B Jaffray .'. i 'o. We Ii ? ? nt . 7. ? ? ? be paid ? ithln -.in., of your i'on eni i ??? ? ? ?i i ; s J .? . . ? ? , ? ? ? ? ? lanl . i tba : ?????' ii-h thai the? ... ; ? ? ? ? . ? it I .... and, If niaslMe, who were . . ' i lai t-r Mi Jafl ra '? will <:?? ,;..! . ' tiii ' ? In a | : i. : ki ..'? - il . ? ? that ti; ? off? r \?.if a k?""I m lid .?i 1. a-ere 13.7 ibllity that Is ; hin I to i - - , ; re I Ii i . over f ' ;??. ? ? : $1.50 "?? I ints and fl ?-.-,.:' -, her i * '?.in i . ? ?-.?. . ind what ?? Ill brli s i . ntlre ?? ; Put? ting 1 ?-? ?-. ??? -.1 invi ?..- .i great shrinkage In their The Tribune's Informant also ?aid thai the the 75 per " I tame thn.ti? ' Is ? Mr Jafl ??? \ nun her of frlei - ? . led the ? is well as I ?? ? ? It on the n -n >????. h i? ? ? ? I I I ? If a s| . " ? ' i be made ? ? that t ? ? ? whl h wou ; ?* ill at.?' ?. .-. ?tl I del?? it - ? ? ? ted that r, at least. 1 II prefer taking the !J | ?? iltlng -??'? ral years for t mon? and j 75 per ? The ?lrm m one of tl I Ii I intry, 1 .. ? ?- -. . I ' ? T nnual ?>u ?' ??"??' nd I i-- Im urg? Tl ? -lit "f ill?- firm, ? I ? I? t, ?nd ? ? ! ubt that If a - ... , ? y ?, dement ,-. madi and lh? firm ? ; h i- k in' - the m ? le. The pr?s nststs ?if Howard S .1 ffi ly, Johi R p '.' '. . -. ater A Hnver The re ... ? . 1 .... i ?. '"'??' . A I V - f N ? - w? ? ? ! it - ?. ? - : ? ? f i he ilnn. ii. ? ? ' Court ring I ? vers tn ettl ihe'.r n with any K * I .... tract ; . .i , s think m ' . ?? - ' : THE 11'iTll <l IS Til P.RTY YE 1RS ? ? i ? ? PAY "a ". .... ? . V ? ? ? ? . it highest i 1* In the nil -. t up to It 1 -. " . ? ?. and .it ? ? .i i ? .. -..i ? . -.. ,,???? .?? ti .tik of and ol board The t,. 1 i \. wit it nlxhl COULDWT PROTB RE OFFERF.O T.F.OAl BOXET Camden, N J.. April 28 iBpeelali An Int. tin? . , un" i?i? ii :'i. Supreme ? 'oun to la? of Walter M Wood agaii I the Camden II:- itail M.I-. Compan) Wood su?Bd for 1500 da mag? being put off one f the lefei ant ? cat ? ?> ? ?' tor i ould noi eh inge th? IS bill ?hi 'h Wood had tendered Bx-Judg* Armsti mg, Ar the defence, wanted t<> kii"\v thi i haracter of the bill, but the plaintiff .."ill not recoll??ci what II ?vas Judgp ? ? n i n granted a lit to th* .'??'? nd ? nl en the uTround thai W 1 would '.mpelled t? prove tii.it he offered legal m ne) Tl.mpany would noi i..- compelled lo arcepi n bank n te; that was a promissory note, and s silver ceri fl ?te was ti"t :i ?. gal-tender. TROUBLE OX THE PEUISEB OLYMPIA ?m i?:, go, r,,; . April -'? if - tal) Th? cruiser Olympia, whl.-h h.is t.: I) ng for several days outside ihi- Kit-i.i.r engaged In gun practice, Is th* ,-Nti<- .if i bitter warfare between the .him the executive officer, Lieutenant-Commander Sturdy Bo enraged ;ir.. the men st this officer, It ltd, that they ?voul I d ??? I aim I In .i bo ly were th? v< ?: brouxht Into th* harbor so I . ? . -I wlm si hot** Wh? n the cruls? ? I B mi i Barb ira no I? dan sixty mot Ii aerl : In itead of ? Ixti *n, a? Caotaln R? ? I repoi ??? I. H n? - when th" erul ' ?? arrived off this port II was leelded to be the pan "f -.\ : lorn lo a..ow the m I? .i" ind ?lo anchor .-?? far oui th il none nf them .-"nd -.-. .m lahi.n he ha? l ashore otter In s hl i the) re ?:???? their srl? vs Tli'.i call ih" ' .I? mpl i th? "\\ i;"? S.aver." Trie cruiser wll re Frida mot nina I n . Pranol? i. d?tint irders ha? Ins '?? >*n r? c? Ived. EBPUBLICAR PLUS A LITIS? TR MICBIOAX, [?anslng, ?Itch ?prll S The canvassing of ; tin- vote .:i?i .-n the April elecllo ?? it th? illty of Judge .1. U \l" ?re, Republlcai . .in lice of the Supreme Court, over Ju itlce Mc Orath, Democrat wai W*A<! l*he pluralities of the Republican candidates for Resent? of the Uni verstt) were aa follow? Rouet W. Rtitterfle'd, ?,H9, si ! Charles II. Lia? kl' y. **.**. i:i l'i:i\?A YDRD l OB COUETTRO Alliance, Ohio, April ?, Th? faculty of M..nut i'iiii.n College i going to pievenl courting nui.'i i: the Bcholai . Baverai ol ib? young women und young m?-i wer? reprimanded this morning. Pi Wei i m. i n remarked: "U ls *""1 that matches are mad? m Heaven, bul 1 think ., branch "th" has been opened at Mounl I'nlon College." Mr Harsh wants more stud) snd less trifltng w.th ??ni Id ?. tXCBBAEB IS POSE PACRIX? Cincinnati, Ohio, April V "Th? Ptioo ?"urrcnt" to-day In Its annual statement of i-"rk "?aeklng In tbe I'nit.'i States hows the total Western packing f.ir the winter season ending March l to h.i\? b?'??n ;.I*t,i -' hogs, an Incwata si tAwljtl? over th" prooedlng > ?-nr; avarags w?>lghl WX.lt poanda, an Unrsass of i.. ?it poanda Th.- manufacturas <?f tiK-ntH Inrrsassd M,SN,fsl p.iundH. and of lard --,.O?ll,000 pounda BtOClU if ?"***' ln Uf w*"'t on March 1. Hl.OM.eoO pounds an IncrStUM of 1M,?*M,?9J0? of pork .19,01? barr?la on increase of lU.OiW barr?la; . ?Ut. ,?:.?. ,? paid the amount of 1232 //? DEPENDS OS JCSTICB JACKSON. THEME will in* a ! t'UKvniM*. OF Till" IXCOXE TAX ?asks IF HE RETURNS ON HAT '*>? Washington, April ?::>. TV- argument to be tr.a?Ic before the Supreme Court of the L'nlted States on : Monday, M ly I, should Ja--;..-?- Jackson fulfil the present expectation sad be mi the ben<cn si time, priu t.ii the wh ?le merits of the income-t ix and not simply on the question of whether .? a i| th(-re shall be a rehearing. This waa leat this m?arnlng from an authoritative aouree. BhouM Justice Jackson not Im euere there will be no argument; an!, In any event, t?.?? descree of the .-??art announced on April >? will mr be vacated or ????t aside until a ma i ?rity of the Justices have ? t? ? initie.1 that ?t shaii be .eft.-r lie.?ring another u ? inent. Should there be such a reversal of the c ?urt's poal on, It will be ann? meed on the disposition mile of the petitions for a rehearing. Tner? v.-.li be t?'it on,- argument It has t. ,t yet been se I I who ?rill t.eke part it? it. OOFEBNOB SliJi III I.l.'s NEPHEW KILLED. SHOT n*f* A DESERTED HfSBAXD THREAT! "I-* LTXCBIXO THE MURDERER Jackson?**ille, Pia., April ?.'"? Near Draldeatown, I'll, Thomas A. Mitchell, ?"?- nephew of Qovernor Mitchell, of Florida, was shot and killed i..-Uy by Perry HsneL Mitchell, who waa a bachelor, owned an orange grove near Braldentowu, mil Mr. and Mrs, Hand were n?.,,;i,?. >rs. Borne time ago Mr??. Hand deserted her husband an.I went to live with Mitchell. The woman afterward returned to her husband, but a w... :% ago she ag t< I him for Mitchell. Hand then swore he wouM kill Mit? chell Testerda) Hand procured a g in and went to Mit hell's home. 'Mitchell met Hand ?it the ??our end Mid: "?So you have rot a gun, have you ' Hand replie I "Ye-e, I have, and i to i.ill you." Ha then lire! one barrel at Mil end ? tarte i to run, il ind en the othei barr?? ? ? . his victim'? b i? k, the ? i I . i le-:..-.?, the heart. Mil hi II lie I In a ;: . it Bra lent? wn an i Mitchell'? frlei thi -aten to lynch him SherilT has a . . ? ? | . i : sentiment is si nsl Mrs. Han I. IHI. 1111,11 PRICE OP FIVE STOCK. .? WIFT AXD Mi r " vi:v U< P." ..v.s A' 1 ? '.'. :? 'V HARMFfl. TO THE FARMER!! ? ' April '-? Refer? : to the ttement made ry Mori ?? Agricultural De partn nt. that ' the pi I ;i ! beei ' pounds < lb? ef a*?.' ??? five to ten cent? ; New-Y. rk e 'Ity, I ? K ?. ' ' ?., Ii in int? rvles "I sold over a n , . pound dressed beei \ - V : i ? .?. ? ek a' ? . ? : ? ,.?? v .?:"].. ? brought seven e.i dur! : ? .-?.r;r.t; m ths of last year It la claimed 'hat th- rets '. butchers are ask? ing ?S to M cents a pound for this beef, bat th-? H cretary falls to mention i it this price Is for e porterhouse, while other portl ' * beeves sell as low as da c I This talk l.> Be retary Morton has caused I . pti ?n I ? fall ..ft nearly 10 per ????' throu t the c intry and la or.e of the reasons why the r--ta.; butchera ar asking ! gh prie ? for beef. Pe ?pie are now i>i>:n?; ti. itt .n and P'.ri. In its ad of be ??'. pr!.-?- "f cattle tO-dly Is fully $1 ."-) a hundr"- 1 higher than it ?u Uutt* ? ?.!?.:-.? perio.j lasi year, and the present Ii .'.nie. Five weeks ??-o, before thi* ..?..? live stock taras '. -> ?a bun Ir? i than last ?? ? its prl?**es. < >f course the farm era want t? re?? Ive the highest partee f..r <*;,tt;.-. and It is the dut) .'. the ?agricultural I'eaiartm-nt to ?'?..k out for the farm? rs but '.r.?t'?ai of a.:::,-, t ?, tbla agitai 'i. has ca i . . Una .?f 7"> cents per h .r. dred , . N-.- .:. Morris ? ne ?f the !ar?e*t cattle fro? rs country. -1 : that the talk ? f ?-'? crei iry Mor? ;h.? meat trade all over th? ;rv : was being sol I In ' 'hlcag ii ? , : irter of a th,:. In Xew-Y irk ; BIO FIRE IS MONTREAL ?,. .,.... ,\n;> THE I!. vv: .s sn ILL R ?V v. v.w i : m i ?:.? ?', !..- ? ?f A T? i' V''. i PAC IXJI REt) M ritre il, \; ill . A llttl " i ? lock this nr flan ,'ered In MacDot . ?. Canada covei ' Ontario-?t., in He ..,,--. ? place waa .... f them glr who ? ? work and prepai t for Iheli Ball was ?* IT, ..: I of the gl ? . -,-..- ? ?: vv. t- b id i ? : .. I in 1 poWe rle irning, it looks ai ? I ? ?. a.r? i?ly will rea ?. ? It vo Liom "'? the baxk bobberv The r.? h i l Iteen no light last i , yirsi Sal ? ? Bank of PI ilnflel I, X. .! ??n Mon ? i ? " ? from the vault ? I ? h rks a -r i The re -a i ? . . ;.k :;i I? , . the toss, becaua kn wn stability. Th ?an ia | pen ? hai ? ? : t . profit an l loss, and ? went on as usai terda i 'hlef ''?ran:, i f the local police, thinks tii bank auth rl lea made i mlntake In not te tng him of the robbery .i^ - as it ?e?? urr.-l The report yewterday thai some bank In tbla citj . recently been i ?bbed :n a waj similar to that .. ? i by th rs of the Plainfleld t>a:;k could not i? confirmed. None of tbe downtown bank presidenta kne? "t any such ?-?? In this city ? ? COVLDTT HATE ICE WATBB, so lllFY KTBUCE. Bridgeton, S J April 25. The strike of the i . employed about the Cohansey Olass Works this n orning ? .- foil iw? I ?.t n >n by a strike of the :**< men employed In the work? The men demanded th?t the firm furnish Ice-water. Manager Bodlna refused, and th? men announced that they would -, ? return to work until the point should he con cede i Manager Bodlne told them that If they did i, t i iport f'.r work when tii" bell ran; ihe fire under the bin window-glass tank furnace vv<?uM l?e drawn The bell ran,;, but th.? men remained out and t!u' fires were drawn It la thought the .-wik" will r.ot t.< a, ttl--l this spring. ,t MTSTBBT OF THE DBLAWABB. l.-ernterTvi,:.'. N J.. April -'? There |g consider at.le mystery abo il the finding of the ho.ii,?< ?,f two men here to-day. An examination ol bodies would make it seem as though both had met death through violence. i-:.??-h ha-i a wound In the head, evidently caused by bullets. The first body vv is found near Washington's Crossing by ti?.o boys, v\h.? were rowing along th.? riv.". ?The bod) lay on the edge of a small Island and was fa : a^.uiiM a clump >?!' bushes, it was removed to the n...: rue al Taylor ??.'.??. .,:.?! subsequently ?.,.-. burled In the Potter's ?>*ield Uke the first I ?dy. the one found In tin canal f?seder near Wtlburtbs had i..?"i in the water several days There were a tnil l.-t hole i.i the kuil an.l ., long deep cul n the id. The rail appear- ! to nave be ? n the re mil ,-i a blow with ?? club rather than bj a knife. CARLTLE'S HOC SB TO /.".' BOVOHT tX MAY. London, April S5,?The Carlyle memorial fund has reached the total of I1.7S. Carlyle's house In Chel? s.-.i will !"? pui'!.-?' 1 in Maj sad Will 1"' itnme dlatety iitt'-i up us a memorial museum, s.? that it may tie ope . 1 to the publl ? In J ine. BLECTBD TBRABBBBB OF MASSACBV?BTTS. it.isf.n. April -.. in the l?gislature to-day the vote for ?State Treasur-er ,? .-..ai;- i as follows: K. P Shaw, of S'ewburyport, 193; Jantes S. ??rinneil, of rjreenfleld. ;'.'. s atterlns*, i, Bnaw was ?ie,-iarc?j < tected. He Is a Republican. ?lili!." cook LOOKED VF tB ALBABT. Albany, April -."? The not.?ri?>us "inr." Co?>k. Uata robber sod dtveSpSarado, arrive?,! here from the U ? --* t .?lay to s. r\.- ?i s.-nten.'?? of feerty-five year? in the Albany penitentiary, The prisoner iMdtweat** conip.ini.'ii". - 4> - - A COBBBB IX HT F FLOUR. St Louis. April 2fi- Rve flour I? now lilgher in this tn,irk?-t than wheat flour, having gone tip ti a barr'1 within a fortnight, ami ts at top prices. Indication? are that It will still advance. The rise la attribute?! to an allege?! coiner by J. L. tlelscJunan, of Cin? cinnati MORTON WON THE ?STRUGGLE UK TORCED Till-: SENATE TO PASS THH POLICE MAGI-STRATEB BILL. IT WAS A BITTKK PILL FOIt MR. H.ATTS DW VOTgrt I'liM/'WKH.? AND AT l.KA-T T?VO OF THEM MAl'K witv PACW AS THKY S\VAI.I/)\VKI? IT?nP.AI.I.EY VOTED with Tin: mXAJOKTTT. [FR?->MTItKRK''?|-T.AIirortRKSpoNnE.VTOFTlIHTRIBt-NB.J Albany, April 2*..?Oovernor Morton pushed through the Senate to-day the New-York. Polloe M .ei trat"?? biil. Two days agi th>s /..Mowers of Mr, Platt in th* Senat? made evident prepara tloi ?' to assassinate th" measure, bill???I they were oppored to giving llayor Strong the au thorlty to main any m r- app Int-ti'n s. Put th* in- would not permit the bl!l to b> klil**?i. il ? had sent a message I i the Legislature Mar<*h ..'. i iiling ..ti the members to pas.? it. and also 'i?" l' II " Reorganisation bill. Mr. Morton, therefore, early this ?reek <-:??rt?-a all hi- In Ilti-ii'-" in th?- Legislature ti pass the Pollc? Magistrates rneasure, and Mr. Plait's supporters i.'?- ; led to surrender. They did not dare oppo " the Govern .- openly In hi? effort to pass the bill; so It paseed with every Republlcu s.>n stor voting for It sn '? me [ndepen lent Dunoerat. .-?? :i it":- Bradley a ?light amendment mad* to tl.- bill in th.. Senate for Elbridge T ?""erry, glv .iii the righl to take children's npp?*al- to the r ?'M of General fl - makes it n-cp sary 11 rvturn i: to the Assembly for concur?? ? th.- hit* Republican majority in the Assembly th.-r.- ?rill be no d'fBculty in Ing the measure there again It may bo ii- ? to-morr m and be In Mayor .strong's han Im before the ?reek expires. There is no Ha* ? Strong ?rill approve of It It i' ???? i" x| ted, theref re, that mim time ?reek the I'd: ??ill become a law. The B ate debated the measare for three ; Ing It. There ?ras one long wall : , ' Hall Somat?n as the amendment after amendnrarat . . ; .' ; te to pass th- bill. The i. -, on Senator Le-*o-***s motion, su* . . :i! ? ni"* In ordei U > - ?> -- It to-day. ?ienai ir Cantor then, its? offeree] nt pr . that ? ne Magistrate nigh pt I all for rail road employes, who, he said, ?vera likely to be iccldi nt. This amendment Senator O'C mnor frankly on the ? Ujh a good .?ne, tu lelay the passage ol the Mil, and Senator Wolfen's pr?ts . s ? i ist I c availed of to secuti ii v? t? il- sug| that the amend? . as .i suppl nental bill. Senatof iment was tK?.i rejected by a troto of 18 to 13. C ? 'xt attacked the Mil general'-r, de inconstltutlonal and unjust He declared that mplalnts had wade against only a f? ??? of th?- Police Justices. The majority re to be removed with? ?t i ise. Senator tVconnoi admitted that the bill was an extra >rdlnary one, bul nail that the oondl tion of the ? irts In New-Yi rk rendered it isary. An) one present at tht- Inquiry of the Lexow Committee Into the conduct of certain Poli o Justl tee would 1- A ir?^ that th" h nob must I . Senator Lexon r?-al from th" t> -stimony *?kea by the L? \ ?v. C nimltte? t . ehow the character of the Poll ? Justices of New-York, ami argued , that In th?* public interest the hill must be ! passed. Speeches against the bill were made by Senators McMshon and O'Connor, and amo by J ? Raines, ?vho afterward voted for it lialnes thought that the l'o.i .- Justl es might be re wtthout parsing ?'i h a bill. The .-? f Mr Rain??? Indicated th?? pain P ,:: Re| i-.; In being compelle? by :? >: it :i :.. v? ti for the bill. CoggeshSa?. ;,:. ? :? i'.i-i s nay be said to have Ing for tne rnea** i m-?-. ?A .- lid ti be "ex; "lient,*" Ud m .. .- "Just." Il" only I for It beeau f the Hepub? easur? ? emed t.? him of. doubtful cunstli _ Mayor Btrong." oa'.d Senat ir ? appoini men who ' will b pi ? - '- R t'iiblic-an nr-ini/.ati- v-i ? I ?" has up I" this time .' rgantzatlon of the Re ? . , New-York, md h I ? ;>layed ?.gainst my con? ? ris I ', ? ? for this The is then passed by the : '.Awing vote: Bradley, ? . Ponald'on, Hig Ktlhurn, l.mi? ? as ' ' mnor, - ? ? Raines. R-'y.'io'.da, ?>?" fe -?" \ ? Collins Guy, Me* Parker, Rice, SuW .. M .:' A IT GOES TO THE BEXATB AGAIN. THE ASSKM.'.V PASSES THE I HACK KK>>U(3aN3Z*w i:;,i. t'N ' v my, Apr! .5 (S| lal) T ? is? waWf did what li ild i la*, to revive th' fortunes ?of the N'.-.v-Y rk : R rganlzatl n Mil, def.?ated y, iterday in the Senate. Th.?-t of restet*da***S cau nbers whl-h made the !.- \ :\ | ; irt) measure gas left? i o|*e**Iy by ? but one R ; I an, Mr. Bell, ?if Sew-York, ?rho voti i wltl rats against it. Two other ; Republicans, Mr. Steinberg and Mr. Miller, of N ?? York, Joined Mr. Be.l in supporting atiene ? : ? ? gi? :i - us. d p ill ?? officers the ; rieht of appeal under certain c-ondlt-toon. Four or five more Republican Assemblymen, among *.; - rs. Hamilton. H? op?, Hatpin and W'llks, "dodged" the record, being c--mvcr>ntly absent, In spite "i" the attempt of the F??pubii.'at*. i. i ; rs i enforce a "call of th?* House." Sub? ! stantlally the solid Republican vote in the As sembly was cast, however, for the bill In its un ;?'n nded form, an?! the seal of party approval was -; imped upon II .??th all the force and em phasls of which the RepubUenn managers In ? : assembly were capable. It ??is Indeed, the h ipe and purpose of the As sembly lead? rs t'? give t ? to-day's vote in that h dy a moral significance sufficiently far-reach Ing to neutralise th ? feeling of parti- demo**all*?a*> ind discouragement which has resulted from ent ? i ? .t- ictl "s of the majority in the Every Repubil an who advo ated the ii- age of the Reorganisation Mil t'-day laid spa .al stress "i: ,vi" r.i -esslty ?-f making s>me Hate demoi itral ' the Assembly*! pur P i?.- t ? - far rs ?">:;?dt.:.\ its pledgeg to give 'ii.- city of New-York some relief from I'o Hce Department corruption, and on Its urgency ' \ resslng t'i" liveliest condemnation of the ? hi h the progress of reform legisla i ' -ked In th.- other hran.-h of the : - - ? Thi R? rganlzatlon hill will now g> to the i-?e?Tr ate, when !.' it.- adv ?cates cho ?e, it can airsia be t ? ? ight up f r passage Whether sufatVient pr? -sure can ("? brought t ? bear to force on" of th.. tv -r.- b Itlng Repubil an S '?>n'? ri to ahirdon Ids opposition t th- measure is entirely probtg? matical. Th > charge was msde on the rt ?or of the Assembly to-day that Mr. C ?ggephall. In voting against the Lexow bill on Tuesday, ?**ae simply following Mi Platt's Instructions, and that, had he b en driven Into line In ?upport of. t i.- rneasure, snother Platt Senator would Illy luv., shifted to th?? oppoMUon. The debate on the Mil In the aseswbly wai marked by no ln.-i lents ?if special ?i terest. Most of the ttin?" was taken up by th ? Democratic ?Ide, tli" apeechea In advocacy ,.f the measure being brief and dewted chlefly t.? lmnresalng tip.iii the maj ?rity the neceealty of standing solidly together and forcing the Senate to re? d.'.-m the party's pr,.niis,-u ?if remedial police leg Islatlon. Mr Stanchfield opened th" discussion, pre sentlng and defending th>> right of appeal and other amendments, fastened for a lima on the Lexow Mil i?v th.- BeMte, Mr. Blake offered somewhat similar provisos and also spoke In th.-ir favor. Mr. Btanchfletd's amendments wer*? defeated on a * a-and-nay rote by 77 to 24. Mr. Bell and Mr BMnberg ?ldlng with the Demo? crat!?. After nsc.ui'.ts on th- Ml) by Mr. Donnelly, Mr. Rennessy and Mr. P .lev. ,,nd brief soeeehea m reply i>? Mr Alnsworth, Mr. (VOrady, i?"peak?*r Pluh and Mr Malby, thf final ?ote was ordered. The n-Hult showed *6 yeas to 22 nays. Mr. Beli again voted with the Democratic -Ide. Mr. Milito* was excused from voting, and Messrs. Steli^lj-irt,