Newspaper Page Text
CHJKLBS DICKBXS. v from His Character, Hi* Career ami 11 h Friends. „, ~ niCKKN-S AND ins rr.Ti:Ni>p By -J. fe one of those agreeable and often the ,1 f not very important books winch the •lioiou* rompner finds mud. amusement and : . .. ■ *a«e l^o-: »* rf volumes of biography, of reminiscence Tor correspondent* results in the collection ;T a ra « of anecdote and of personal deserip £ and" characterization: and these things. *Sn C on a thread of gvnial comment, provide SS«*ook which is not at all bad in its way. vr Shore makes his reader more or less tati teK acquainted with Dickons and the writers a 7 artists who surrounded him. All are gone 5w and for most of us their work is dead. too. The novelist himself remains gloriously alive . Hp books, of which edition after edition con- t T CTf >« to roll off the press, although various Nacres admonish us that these stories are Ijopplessly old-fashioned. No doubt they are, v°l while men have hearts and a sense of i^nor'they wIU read and enjoy the novels of Charles Dickens. The favorite charge against fxa is that of exaggeration. To this Mr. Ches ■ Jertoa made, the other day. as good an answer ■ ,„,. -jf one once gets fairly to human * S-S -lSt-"l St -" he said, "with those classes thai form rC'vast mass "f mankind, one finds one's self fcadea page of Dickens." •:•■, novelist often 't,.;,'- J from sentiment into sentimentality, as vr Shore admits— but how often, too, he has stirred the secret places of wholesome . motion ~nd made life easier for the sorrowful and the o pressed! It may be that in a materialistic when bouquets are sent to murderers and heroes are manufactured out of sordid advent urers, mankind need not greatly worry over T^ sentimentality of Dickens. The fact re mains that he touched to sympathy a genera tion that had been indifferent to the exploita tion of the joor and the helpless, and that he brought alniut changes a feeling and in meth ods for which Englishmen may still be grateful. When Mary Cowden Clarke read the an aonaewnent of his death, "the sun." she said, -srem^i suddenly blotted out." An incarnation of sunshine he often scorned to his friends, his high s: irits. his contagious comicality, so sel dom fa-.!-.:. He was a handsome fellow in his yoath. as Mr<. Clarke in her old age remem bered. "What eyes his were!" she said. "Large, dark blue, exquisitely shaped, fringed wit!; mag nificently long and thick lashes— they now swam in liquid, limpid suffusion, when tears started ... from :t sense or humor or a sense of jathos. and now darted quick flash's of fire when some generous indignation .it injustice or pome high wrought feeling of admiration of magnanimity or ?ome sudden emotion of in terest iind excitement touched him." He] red to taik. to laugh, to tell stories, but be was as gtx«3 a listener as talker. Impulsive and im jftuous as }'.<■ was. he was a miracle of indus try and— as his daughter Mary wrote of him — -there ::• v- : • xi--t-d. I thi::k. in all the world a mor* thoroughly tidy or methodical creature. He was tidy in every way— in his mind, in fcis handsome and graceful • -::. in his work, in keeping his writing table drawers, in bis larg< : : .-; • :iJtti< •-. in fact, in his whole life." He drew on his stores of energy without mercy— Mr. ?hor<? notes that his way of rest ing a tired brain was to indulge in violent bod ily exercise — but he drew upon them by rule. He had certain hours for working, and noth ing was allow* d to break into them But when be playd he played with a will, nd everybody aear him exi<anded .... sunshine. Those who ire amused in these days at descriptions of the novelist's gorgeous clothes and many rings and lockets f'-rg-t that when the ><>uth burst into jTusperity and popularity ..... wore such things ar.d were admired. Perhaps Dickens pre served his f.orid taste rather later in life than did his early companions — he need not be pnidged that amiable weakness. Those who loved him joked about it affectionately. We. :ir* told that when the gift of a gorgeous piece «f stuff wa.< made t" a well known artist of the i«-iod he wondered what he could do with it. "Oh, send it to Dickens," said his friend, YVilkie Collins: "he'll make a waistcoat of it.'' "With children Dickens was his most delight ful and lovable self. There is a charming pict ure of his evening performances with his own Vra\- ones, when lie would ... comic sons; zfier another to them, "the which be would Lhssell enjoy and laugh at as much as any vf his sn;a!l audience." At these before, bed time entertainments "encores were allowed es- Jfd&lly of one ditty of an old rheumatic man. -ho had caught colu in an omnibus, which was sung with a piping voice, broken with coughing and sneezing." Never was there a father who '■■-- a.or<- dearly th»- friend of his youngsters. "iif understood their •-■••- says Mr. •-"h"r~, "the cause of su«h horrible agony — no ■a«iker w ( .:d could be strong enough— to so rsaay small ones. He entered heart and soul i-to all their amui-ements, their keeping of pet ani;na!.s— did he not himself keep pet ravens?— :-ad their games." Wt have a glimpse of him *ith John Iv -e< h learning to dance the polka Slider th< solemn instruction of little Mar;. -•id Kat<-. his daughters; and other glimpses of hiai as head and front of all the fun on birth t^ys aiid Christmas times. There was an ever- NEW-YORK DAILY TRIBUNE. SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 2fl( j<)io. welllng tenderness for childhood in his heart. As for his record as a husband, that is a sub ject which Mr. Shore leaves as enigmatic as a- found it why Dickens should, in middle aim, have found the mother of his ten chil dren so disagreeable that he could no longer endure her presence— why she calmly aoqai eaoed m the separation— these are mysteries with which the world had and has no need bo inquisitively concern itself. Dickens was an irritable man of genius, his Catherine was a perfectly commonplace person, apparently a rather Stupid one— and there were, a* it may not be unreasonable to surmise, too many quar rels for household ease. She kept silent to the end: he talked about in matched temperaments and incompatibility. The truth was, we imag ine, that Dickens married when he was too young and impulsive to consider the necessary question of compatibility. He was an incomparable friend, loyal, affec tionate, careful of the little kindnesses which nourish friendship. He had a generous sym- P^. Ny and admiration for the work of <M.her men. In polities be was a radical so far as radicalism meant the redress of abuses and the lightening of tin burdens of humanity. He was in the very fibre of him a religious man, but not a sectarian. They say that Byron's daughter asked him on her death bed. "Do you ever prayT" and he answered, "Every morning and evening." When his youngest son sailed for Australia in IS(JS the father wrote to him. "You will remember that you have never at home I .. n wearied about religious observances <.r mere formalities. I have always been anx ious not to weary my children with such things ore they art- old enough to form opinions re specting them. You will therefore understand th.- : ■■• that I now must solemnly impress poo you the truth and beauty of the Christian religion, as it came from Christ Himself, and the Impossibility of your going far wrong if you humbly but heartily respect it." No creed could be simpler, none more powerful if men did but follow it. Perhaps what is, on the whole, the truest estimate of Charles Dickens was set down after his death by one who rarely had an entirely ungrudging word for anybody —Thomas Carlyle. "It is almost thirty years since my acquaintance with him began/ wrote the Scotchman, "and on my side 1 may say every new meeting ripened it into more and more dear discernment of his rare and great worth as a brother man; a most cordial, sin cere clear-sighted, quietly decisive, just and loving man: till at length he had grown to such a recognition with me as I have rarely had for any man of my time." -Privilege and Democracy in America- is the title of a new book by Air. Frederic C. Howe. • book which th- Scribners will publish next "month It deals, as this title indicates, with subjects much talked of just now. FRENCH LIFE. A Popular Feminine Writer's View of It. ON THE BRANCH. Prom the French of Piem <!*• Coulevnin. by Allys HalUrd. \-nu< . pp. •i' I '"' 1-- I 1I 1 1 Mittim <V- Co Tin cr.-at novelists appear only at interval one thinks of the brilliant international constel lation of the last half of the nineteenth century — Itut no country is ever without Its popular writers, who may frankly be mere purveyors of entertainment, or. taking their work seriously. translate Into simple terms for the multitude the meanings of current thought, movements and tendencies. No mean talent Is required for this humbler service, even though it must i>« one <>f a minor kind; he who. not having it, believes that he can "write down" to the level of this enormous audience will soon discover his mis take. The lady who insists, in a letter to her Ca IARLES DIOKEXS. (Prom the portrait by Maclise.) publishers, that her pseudonyme of "Pierre de Coulevain" must be respected possesses this talt-nt. Readable "On the Branch" Is, for Anglo- Saxon as well as for French readers, notwith standing its Gallic plot which, being laid in the narrator's past (the story is told in the first per son), is perhaps better described as its point of departure. It reminds one of the "Lettres de iYmrnes," with its wife deceived by her husband and her best friend, and the \\h-> should be hers, but is the mistress's. The narrative itself does not begin until many yens later, when tin tragedy of discovery 1 on the day of the husband's !eath has receded into the past, and the victim, .it fifty, can look back to gauge the influence it has liad in the shaping of h. r later existence and development oiu- of life's little ironies brings together again the two women, so changed by the passing years, ar. 1 the son. The bo..k is readable becau» its philosophy o! life is emotional rather than rational— intensely fem inine. And the majority of novel readers arc said to be women. The echoes of many current reactions from the materialism of the last fifty years are (if a mixed metaphor be permissible) turned in this story into small change for popular circu lation, with the purpose of leading back to re ligion—to Roman Catholicism, in the case if France, but to a Roman Catholicism that will be in perfect sympathy with the untram melled progress of science, which, the author holds, will in its turn ultimately prove to be religion's apologist: "It will teach us how one 'walks on the water.'" Tills is typical of Pierre de Coulevain's thought. She passes in review the aristocrat . the bourgecisi< and the peasantry of France, whose present condition fills her with despondency: "France has be- me a kind of safe from which each pcrsoa lay take, ]. v which no one thinks of filling up again. And it is not for Prance that people are working, but either for the republlic, the monarchy or the empire. Under the Influence of these petty ambitions France can love only that was imposing about it."' The picture of life in the book, it will be seen from this, is objective as well as subjective — psychologi cal. The author is a strong Anglophile, and. of course, she who wrote "American Nobility" and "Eve Triumphant" cannot fail to turn In attention anew to the American woman: "I have no prejudice against them, believe me." aid Sir William 'Their faults shock me, and my education prevents me from appreciating their extremely modern qualities Judge for yourself. They are the only women in the world who will ingly leave their husband and children enjoy themselves and ;rre quite happy away from them." "That is true, but have you ever thought that, if the conjugal bond were a* close in their coun try as in ours, it would interfere with the action of the men and hinder their work? Do you not think that these women are the necessary agents of exchange between the New and the Old World, the unconscious vehicles of ideas and of im pressionsT 1 "No; l have not the novelist's imagination. "There is no imagination in that; it is scientifi cally true. The invisible cargo of an Atlantic liner is considerably more Important than that whictl pays duty, but in quite another way." LITERARY NOTES. There is to be a new biography of Dean Pwift. this time written by a woman. This daring person wears the name (if Sophie Smith. Twc voium< s of reminiscences are on the way — one by a novelist and one by an artist. Mr Joseph Conrad is th'- novelist and Sir Hu bert yon Herkomer. the artist. The last survivor of the individual characters of "Tom Brown's School Days'" died a few weeks ago. at the agre oi ninety-one. This was Sir Charles Strickland, who appeared in the pages of Thomas Huph<-s"s famous boob as "Martin the Madman."' the young naturalist and Tom's second in the lively encounter with **Slogger Williams." Sir Charles, it is said, never had a serious illness in his life, and he celebrate 1 his ninetieth birthday at a meet of bounds. Professor C. W. Wallace's discovery of the record of a lawsuit in which Shakespeare was a witness is to be set forth in the forthcoming number of "Harper's Magazine," with photo graphic reproductions of the time-worn parch ments and of the dramatist's signature. The house at Skien. in Norway, in which Ibsen was born has been destroyed, but the melan choly abode at Grimstadt in which he sold pills and plasters and tooth brushes, and in which he wrote his first play, still survives, and there is a movement in his native land t<- pur chase and make an Ibsen museum out Of it Enthusiasts who think that Ibsen was a person of dazzlinp genius are called upon to contribute. Many people assert — Ibsen is said to have as serted it himself— that there was not a drop <>r" Norwegian blood in the playwright's veins; that he had Danish, German, Scotch ancestors. Dr. Halvdan Koht points out in -'The Nineteenth Century" that, on the contrary. Ibsen's ances tors had lived in Norway for generations, and that among his immediate ancestors there were some of pure Norwegian descent. His mother's mother was Hedevig Paus. and. because her name sounds German, people have been led to suppose that she belonged to a Ger man family. But closer investigation has shown that the Paus family was pure Norwegian, origi nating with a Norwegian clergyman who. at the beginning of the seventeenth century, adopted this surname as being more refined t! ;;n Paulson. H:-= descendants lived as government officials, mer chants and farmers in the district round Skien. and there were in the family several talented members among whom were some poets who wrote in the dialect of that part of the country. It -=.i happens that Ibsen's tirst biographer, Ile:ii-.,v j-»e"-i r (ts^s> traces one of the principal features of his character back to Hedevig Paus. and in ac cepting that we shall have to admit that Ibsen was not only born in Norway, but truly was vc Norwegian. ■John Lothrop Motley and His Family" is the title of the collection of Motley- letters which Mr. John I>ane is preparing to publish. These ej.istl; s. which are of a personal and an intimate character, were not included in the volumes of the historians correspondence pub lished some -.ears ago, because they contained :; any references to people then living and t.» events then current. The book promise, to br one of the most interesting and valuable ■ - the coming season. Another forthcoming collection is to bear the title of "Intimate Society Letters of the Eigh teenth Century." It has betn edited by the Duke «>i Argyll, the material having been drawn from the family archives at [nveraraj Castle Much <>f it l;-> : to do with the reign of Queen Anne, and much concerns tin Jacobite movement. Some hith< rto unpublished letters from the pen of lime, de Siael are to be in cluded The doctrine of Scripture held by early Vic torian orthodoxy is somewliat tardily .is-.:;! 1 and br< ught to confusion by Mr. J Allanson Picton it: "Man and the Bible" tHenry Holt & Co.). Fetishistic awe of the Bible has often been accompanied by stern moral fervor; but, unfortunately, says .Mr. Picton, the apotheosis of the book has given authority to its worst parts as well as to its best. When superstition and fantastic theologies h;iv done their utmost, tho Bible will vindicate mon and more its claim to be a stilt living record of the struggle of man toward purity. freedom :-.nd light I>r Rein hold Seeberg's "Revelation and Inspiration (Harper & Bros.) is ar. effective putting forth of what modern orthodoxy believes about Holy Scripture. The notion of a verbal inspiration of the Bible hn~ disappeared as if in a night, says th< !:• rlin professor, and no theologian of any repute now upholds it. Sinc< it never pre vailed throughout the Church, the theory can be surrendered without affecting the vital re ality, that revelation of God through which He hecoznes operative in mankind, a revelation of which the Bible is the monument. "Kings in Exile" is not a new title, but Mr. Charles G. D. Roberts evidently could not re sist the conviction that it exactly tits the con tents or his new book. The discrowned sov ereigns to be met there are not men and women such a? play their brief parts in Daudet's novel; they are the splendid ,«rr*:it beasts who have beer, torn from their jungle homes to live among curious humans. The author does not make his animals talk, bat he makes them reveal indi vidual character, all the same. 1