New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, November 17, 1911, Image 4

Search America's historic newspaper pages from 1770-1963 or use the U.S. Newspaper Directory to find information about American newspapers published between 1690-present. Chronicling America is sponsored jointly by the National Endowment for the Humanities external link and the Library of Congress. Learn more

{
                  title: 'New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924, November 17, 1911, Page 4, Image 4',
                  download_links: [
                  {
                   link: 'https://www.loc.gov/rss/ndnp/ndnp.xml',
                   label: 'application/rss+xml',
                   meta: 'News about Chronicling America - RSS Feed',
                  },
                  
{
    link: '/lccn/sn83030214/1911-11-17/ed-1/seq-4.jp2',
    label: 'image/jp2',
    meta: '',
},
{
    link: '/lccn/sn83030214/1911-11-17/ed-1/seq-4.pdf',
    label: 'application/pdf',
    meta: '',
},
{
    link: '/lccn/sn83030214/1911-11-17/ed-1/seq-4/ocr.xml',
    label: 'application/xml',
    meta: '',
},
{
    link: '/lccn/sn83030214/1911-11-17/ed-1/seq-4/ocr.txt',
    label: 'text/plain',
    meta: '',
},

                  ]
                }

New-York tribune. [volume], November 17, 1911, Page 4, Image 4
About New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924

Image provided by: Library of Congress, Washington, DC

Image: of 14.

Page

All Pages

Issues

All Issues Text | PDF | JP2 (7.3 MB)

New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]), 17 Nov. 1911. Chronicling America: Historic American Newspapers. Lib. of Congress. <https://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1911-11-17/ed-1/seq-4/>

Newspaper Page Text

DEWY IN PACK CASE
Judge Grants 24 Hours for Coun?
sel to Answer Affidavits.
EITHER SIDE WILL APPEAL
Government Contends That the
Packers' Petition Was Not
in Good Faith.
?"hi? ago. Nov. U?Pitting ? guestion ?d
fa? t ?against a guest low of law and adro
?atlti? the ?aus,? or p iblk \\?-lfai<- ng.iitisl
n allegalioti of ?elfish, pecuniary motives
lawy.-??. for Hie Indicted ?'hi? ago pa?k?-r
i?>-il?iv f? srnment counsel In ar
eff?,;i to obtain a nnal ruling an the ?rimi
nai clause of ?he Sherman anti-trust eel
from tin United St: ? ne ?'ourt. be
for* th* ?packers shall -.:?> i?? trial.
The courtroom ?if I nit- ?1 Stat-s <*ir?ui1
Jiaigi- c. ?'. Kohlsaal was th? bsttlegroun**
far ti ? clashin* forve* ?>i legal wit and <??
] - i. n . W ion tii. ???nil ?lay en?h-<l hotl
- ? Th.- argu
in? i.ts will be raaumed to-'motron morning
Th* question ??i fact a<dvnneed by counsel
for th* |'i'k.-i- -?as !<? th.- <-ffect that tin
tefententi nail} had been under isstroim
for on. ? ,?.- tem Monday, after they ha?i
inn mot tendered bj their bondatpea, and
?vM-ir. therefore, auhjeel to th? operation ol
t li?t??.?- - <?n? i- lasr.
Inst ibis, -Sawyers fot the goyei-nroent
ii?- ?a?. 4 thsl ta .? -i". sti?.n ef law th?
packers bad no rlghl t?> us? th.? babeas
eorpua wrll be? i ? -?? their method of mar?
ri mitt ?a ? faro, legally,
? t under restrain!
?\fter they i a?i thi ? ? s? knotty
Jiollitv I I - I;.\- ? ?1. .1 1o polttav
tn wi'lci?. different purposes, which they
?aid actuated th* packer* In makii .
?on for '? ." writ of habeas coipus.
I.?-?. Mayer, ol ???in??-: for th* Indicted
?declared th?! th.? welfare ol business
in all ?luea th? countrj over demanded th?'
<Hrh- from the l'nit?*?l
?Bl I m th? validity
? fthei man anti
?
"N< ' Ivei agitation,"
. "ha* the business ol th*
, ......
i it ha roe* th ? uncertain
? tion of ', In
? i Imlnal ? .- Bhei man aci "
Jan ? : couns? l for the
he put pose behind the
i ? tltlon of ?ii? to avoid, f
-?f i :ial until ! ?
stltut'Onalit of I ... m ?<?? of the
: Rnall*
Decision Expected To-day.
\ -i ? ? ?.-?i to
n t- d a tw< n
? i counsi l for i he
p.?'.,- ? Its t'l? ?1
!:. 'h-- i wer* pie
! by attorneys f"i Ihc government
Vovei - - 14 lie
?, ?ah? ?! . -nen! all?,We,I t?j
??-I ?rith :t> trial, sel for next Monday,
??n Indictment! :, ,.f the
?nan anti-u ?: i.u
in any -1 not believed the -trial*
?f the packer* v\?i? begin on Monday, in
ins the govem
ti? nt lenl on thai the packers' petl
t??n was ri"t in good faith, ami quashes th?
"???it ? ? ?-. men have announced the)
v in appeal t?? ti;. ?Supreme Court ami thus
???tain i ruling ??n th.- . ..rsttfutionalit v of
non?? of ' i ?? ?Sherman law.
accordlni to counsel, will h;i \ ?? the
ting trial on the Indictments
omit the ruling.
Should .luilue Kohls,i,ii groat the writs,
? will app- al t" tbe Bupi? me
? ? irt
'i'ii- ? t?*ntlona <.r the government
?hat th? packers ) ad not acted In
?-"?-?l faun In ?applying to the Circi ,t ?'ourt.
thai the Circu?! court ?am* without
jurisdicii? n.
Tb. quaak was ask??i f,?r the
1? -Slowing ? i
1'nst. that in? ?Ciretlil ''?cut WSl with
out jurisdiction to enter the writs.
Second, that the petitioners were not Im?
prisoned or restrained at the time of tiling
ihe |>etltlon.
Third, that the leave t?> ni?- ?? petition
was ?ranted In Ignorance of th* tssenttel
feet* bearing upon tin- propriety of enter
talnlng su. h a petition.
I'ourtb. i hat the p.-tltlon Was n?d In C??"l
faith, but was for the purpose of avoiding
trial on Hi?- Issues ?>t the ?Indictments
Fifth, that Hi?- ?petitioners were not ar
t * v t ?.l. inn the pretended Imprisonment
was at their own instan? ?? 1?? glv* ground
for alhgalioi.s ,,f tti?- petitions
Sixth, thai the petitioners have lmnos?'?l
on ihe court b) making it appear thai th?
i purpose of their act is to obtain a ?l?-?-isi??n
? ?n the validity of the Sherman act, wherea*
the trn?- pin pose is to transfer th?' custody
of the petition?*!* from Un- District ?"ourt
so ?as !?> "i?-v?nt trial upon Indictment
?Seventli, roch of Ihe petitioners has
pleaded "not ?guilty" ?o the Indictments
?and is not entitled to have any questions
decided bv other than the District ?"ourt
, until a tudsmeni has ?been obtain- ,1 agslnst
; him upon S wrillrt finding him ?guilty.
NEW RULE FOR INCORPORATION.
Albany, NOV. I*.? Under the provisions of
..?: a?t passe?' this year, the Secretary of
state, after Jaauary I next, win not he r?
? lo i???ivc a rortMcatC Of a proposed
????rporation. Other than a religious, ?hariia
l?le or henev'oletit corporation, which does
not dearly indicate that It Is a corporation
Bf distinguished from ? person, tlrm or ? ?*
, partnership, according t<> nn opinion by
Attorney General Carmody,
ROMANCE IN A BOOK SHOP
How Girl Found a Husband
Through Misfortunes.
tin? ?In. sn't expect to find much romance
-around a s. cond hand book stor?, except
! tlie romantic adventure* of blbllomaniaci
In discovering first editions. Occsskmally,
i though, tome little drama has it* ?setting
,,f tbos* dimly lighted, musty smell?
Il g "hl ]?'a? ?s one sees or-, asiotially In
Isome ??f tha lesa Frequented streets of th?
l(l?'|l.
Inst??a?l of the glittering lights and the
- " i, bowevei. th?-r.- is 0nlv a stoop
ahouldered, ?protected ??l?! man for ? sun?
, er, the dusty volumes tor speetatore
| and t!;. m ?rrnnr -if the trafflc of th.- clt.v
to fm ?nish "slow mii-ic.'"
"Wi hav? our util?? biis of corned] .I
! ?tragedy, too, aomathnea," said the pro
I prletoi ol one ?>i?i bo??k shop quoted by
I 'The Chicago Daily N*W*." "Did you
notice thai man who Just wen( out ? mo?
in, nt ?ago? v.-s? Well, i may say i navei
? led .n getl rig him happily manled i
and toa mighty nice girl. ?too. it was aim
pie
al fellow was a confirmed bacheloi
id t?? ?n coming In bei a I ?r a auinbei
ira, and i got to know him quit? wi-?i
in i vit him s bout ids bachelorhood
| > ? asionallv, I,nt h?- wa- one of these shy,
dlcal men, and hit ro?oms ovi i north
i home enough for him until lasl
spring.
"I pinchase,l pu't of a library last win?
ter from the widow of n man bnre prom
I inent in th? business and social affair* ??t
Chicago The family had falb-n Into ?re
?in?. I I'ircumatancea ???al they at last ware
! i???? ?i la .-?-il th.- ?books, Th? daughter, a
I young woman In her earl) twenties, ?'?>n- !
I ducted the negotiations, and il<<- book*
w . i,. ,,, ii , iv?i t., n,.- n was no! long after
that n j friend dropp?*d In, and I ?-aiied his
attention to my roc-rat purchase He pick?!
J oui a lili!?- .oh.m?- <?', poemi from the
1 Italian and t??ok it home with him He had
: -? .?i ?? -iv left the shop * h? n llie young '
i woman came In. It seema there was ?some ?
1 sentimental value attached to th>- volum? <
? i had Ju*( -"i'l and that it had b) accidenl ;
? b.vn included in the i-?t I had purchased. |
She want?-,! to know it i could gel I) back
; for her.
"It sounds a little like a novel, but the
negotiations between myself sn?! mj baeh
; elor cuatomer an?i the young woman
brought al o il their acquaint inc? i w rote
him a n?it?- explaining the situation and
asking him if h?- would -et un the 1.k.
11? : rough) It back the next mon ln|
.von.an dropped in at I be
time to see what i had ?ion? about h i
Introduced them, and the guis confusion
over having marked ?several passage- in
ilume an?! his confusion In admitting
his h.ivitu- read thoM paanagea with con
si lerablt- Inteiesl was ?pretty i<> ?see.
-r,, , a a long tt< i'? siiori they found ? -
caston t?' m?jet hew once or twlc* a week
?after tiiat an?) look over books In Which I
they were both Interroted, and ? w:>*1 n"? ?
particularly -?upris.-,, last June to i
Kti Invitation to the wedding "
"What kind of a present <li?l you send"""
-kid.
i was fortunate." answered the j?r?i- ;
prietor "There was an ???dition ??f Mon?
talgne'a essays tliej had i,.-?n looking for
.mil al.t a week before the wedding it :
came In wHh ?some books from th* library
of an oi?i maa en tb? Weal ?Side, it was ;
I in tw,, volum? -. "i ? each, and i m nt it t?i
th'-m. J
ROOSEVELT ON TRUSTS
? ..ni ?mini from fir?! I***!*.
whatever their ?-onM Intent.s wished them to
think, crafty rsectlonsiirs who winhe<l to
1nee wii ths Statute book? laws which they
? li,'lii'Vt'?l Unenforceable, :ii|?l th? almo t
solid "Wall ?Street crowd." or representa
Uve? ?if "Ms business, who at that Urns
opposed with equal violence both wise ami
necessary and u?arlas ana Improper regu?
lation of. business - all fought ?gainst the
adoption of ? i?aii,'. effective hiiiI far?
resehlna policy.
The Control of the Trusts.
It In a vitally IMOSSSSry tiling to hav?? the
persons In control of bife mints of the
I character of the Standar?! oil Trust an?l
Tobacco TniKt tauahl that th??y arc under
the law. just a* ?t ?uh a iieceasary thins
I to bars the ?Sugar Trust taught the same
lesson in drastic fashion by Henry l- Stlm
SOS v\ lien h,? wan 1 nited BtStM l?lHtri?-t
?Attorney In the city oi N?-vv York Bui t?>
attempt to meet the whole problem nol by
administrativo governmental scUon bul by
' a su? (?-.?slur, of lawsuits is hopeless from the
I standpoint of working oui ? permsnentl)
satisfactory solution. Moreover, the results
?ought to he achieved sre schiered only
in extremely liwufnctenl snd fraamenta?jry
? n.easiir.. by breaking )1|? all big e?>rpot-.-i
Ittone, whether they h.iv.. behaved well or
i III. Int.? a numb, ?r ..f little corporations
; which :i is perfectly certain "ill b?- largely,
an?l perhaps altogether, under the ?jams
i control Sui-h soften Is harsh and ml
chlevous if th?* corporation is guilty of
nothing except its size; snd where, sa In
the case of the Standard Oii, ind '-spceiaiiv
the Tobacco, trusts, the ?corporation has
been guilty of Immoral arid ?nti-soclal prac?
tice?, there Is need for far more drastic
and thoroughgoing action than an.' thai
has been taken under the r, ?'? tit deo ? ??? "f
the Supreme Court.
of the ptntenx-nt?* .?f tin? Tobe<cco can
in tin- Circuit Court, the ?ag-Piealdenl
asserts thai "it practically i?av,-s all o(
tht compaplas still substantiell), under
?tin? ?oiitroi of Hi?' twenty-nine original
defendants. Tiu-n he says:
Such result is lamentsble from th? stand?
point <?r Justice. The ?i?-? Iston of the ? .1
cull Court, if allowed t.? rtand, meen? thai
tin? Tobacco Trust has merely i>?-<-n obliged
to change its clothes, thai none of the reel
offenders bars received any real punish?
ment, while, sa "Th? New York 'rim?*-."
a pro-trust pap? r. says, the tobacco con?
. 1 ros. m their nee clothes, are in pea
of "ease and luxury." and "Immune nom
pro? iti?.n under th<- lew."
"A Miscarriaqe'of Justice."
Burely, ml?si*errlege "f Justl ?? la nol t....
stioti). ;i term |o apply tu such a result ,
! when considered In (*onnection with what
th? s ipicm ? ?'?.ut t said of this trust. Thai
greet ???uit in It? decision ui*ed languag?
>v hlch, m *pite ?.r lu hi I Itusl snd a-?? 1 re
?elf-restrslni In st?smatising wrongdoli
5 ? t unhesitatingly 1 ondemna the To
Trust for moral turpitude, aaylng thai the
case show* .m "everpresenl manlfestaUon
. . ..i consclouK v. rongdolng ' b) the
trust, whose history 1- "replete with the
?lolllg ?if SCtS Which II was the ObvlOU?
: lirpOSe ?'I the Statute t(. forbid.
demonstrative of the existence from the
1 ? ginning of ? purposi t.. acquire dominion
snd control ol the tobacco trad- nol bj
ti- mere exertion of the ordinary right to
rontrucl and ;.. trade but by method? de?
vised In order to monopolise the tri?le by
driving competitor?? out oi bu*di*r**ss, which
svi e 1 uthleasl 1 rani**d ??-it upon t ? 1
sumption that the work upon the fear? ??!
play upon the cuplditj >.f competitors
would make Bucees* possible."
The letters from and '.? vartoua official?
of th?- trust, whj.'h were pul in evidence,
?hoe .1 literally astounding and horrifying
Indulgence bj the trust In wicked and de
b lines? met l)oda auch aa the "?-n
deavor t.? cause a atrlke In their [a rival
ess firm's I factory." or the "shutting
1 iff tin- market" <?t an independent tobacco
firm by "taking the necessai step? i..
.. in. m a w.'nm 1 ??-. eptlon." or 1
Importera Into a price igreemenl by cau*
Ing and ? ..ntiniiiir- '.1 demoralization ..t
the buainesa for nuch length ?>f time
may be deemed desirable" ?i quote from
the lett?
A trust ?guilt) of such im.lit should be
? 'led, .Mill till- Olli] '?'
prevent the repeUtlon of such conduct la
.v?eminent supervision, snd nol
iiiei.|\ by lawsuits
The anti-trust law, Mr I'?>.. ..-\. it as?
sert?, cannot meet the whole situation,
nor ? an am inodlflcalIon ?>i the anti?
trust law .ivi'il t.. in?? t the v\li??le :itu
ntion. He continues:
The anti-trust law cannot meet the whole
?Ituatlon, nor can anj modification ?>t the
principle oi the anti-trust law avail t..
meet Ihe whole situation. The fact is thai
man) of the men who b..v.- called th m
sclve? Progiwives, and who certalnl) be?
lieve that the) are Progressives, represent
in reality In this matter nol progr?s? Si all
but ? kind ol sir? ? re 1 ni si lor) lam.
Th.. effort t" lest?"?- competition
WU Sixty ?<:"-s a;-?., snd t.. trust f..
tice solely to tins proposed restorstlon .>t
cmpetitlon. is Just as foolish hs If **?'
should go back t<> th'' nitnl"?ks of \\asn
ligtons Continentals tu a substitut?- i?
modern weapons <?f precision. The enor
to prohibit all ,-.?m???nations go"'l '?' ' **?
i- bound to fat!, and aught to tail; wh-i
nuil?, n merely means that ?some ??[ ">?
worst, combination! are nul cht*cked am
that none*! business M cheeksd.
"Not to Strangl* Busin*??."
Our pulp??-.? should be IMt tO straP'-ih
b .s!,?.sH ?a* an 1n?'i?l?n' Of strangling tWII
lllnatlots but to regulate big corporation!
Ii. thoroughgoing and eff??cllve fashion, s?
as to help legit?mate bustnroa as an inci
!?'?nt to thoroughly and complete!! ?*af<
'?-nanllng ihe Interests of the people as i
Whole. Against all such ln?**f**ase of S-ov
lernrneni regulation the argunnenl Is raise?
that it would smounl to s form ol
l?m. This argument i familiar; ?t i? pre
? c.s?iv the same as thai * hlch * i
la;', tin m the ?creation of the Interstate ? om
| mere? Commlmion and of all the dlfferen
utilities commissions In th? dlfferenl state?
las 1 mvsi-lf saw. thirty ^-ar^ ago, wh.n I
Ivas a legislator at Albany and ?Ins. f|uei
tlfins came up in tionnectlon with our ?Jtati
?government
"it is conti'tnl'-il Hint in tlM M '? ?'? hl
<!??' i-loiis." Mr. Koos< \?'1t says, "tl S :
i p?eme i'ourt legislated." "8fl it !'?!?" 01
?assert.?-?; "and ?t had to ?be?cauai Con
leyem had signally fallad t?> do It* <i"ty
i j legislating." To this be adds:
Kor the Suprime Court to nulllf) an acl
of the legislator?- as uiKonst1tutioii.il SX?
<?-pi on the clearest grounds la usurpation;
to Interpret i?uch an act In an obvlouel)
WTong sense |s Usurpation; but M h? ?re th.
leglslaUve ?body ?persistent!) leaves open
a nehi which it is absolutely Imperative,
from the ?public standpoint, to till, then no
possible blame attache? t<> the official '"'
Official* who Step in b?-? -a use they have to.
and who then do the needed work In the
?nteres! of t lie ?people,
, Ti,.- blame in such ?rases lias with the
I body which has been derelict, and Bol
i with the body which reluctantl) make?
good the derelicUon.
In ? iosing bis editorial, the 'x-l'itsi
?li-nt ?rives ins \i.-ws ?is to th* means by
,wi)i?-ii governmental <-<.>iitr??i of ?the greal
? ? i'!?nations may be cx?r< is?-?l. II - says:
i To sum up, then it Is pro 'Ucally Impos
i slble, and, if possible, It would be ml
i ??us and un-dealrabl? t<> try to break up all
-combination? merelj ?becsus? tbes are
larga and auccessful, and t?? pul the busi?
ness of ih<- country ?back Into the middle
Iof tb?- eight?-.-mh century conditions <u In?
tense and unregulated competition betw-tei
small an?I W< ak l-Usin.-.--s I
"Well Meaning Toryism."
? S'n-1, a n eflfoi i represent i not pi
! si ven? ?sa bul an unintclllaeni :
doubtb*** pntirelj well-meaning t?
Moreover, n ? effort to admlnl -t- i ? law
. meiely by law.suits and courl -i- .
bound !?? end In signal failure, and i
i while t.? be attended with delay? and un
I certainties, ano t?? put ? premium upon
legal sharp P'aitii-, Sui'h an eifori doe?
t.??t ad? quatel- punish the ?guilt*. ??
' worka srrai harm lo the Innocent, \i r?
;.,?. er. ii ? ntin ly fall? to ?give t h? p ?
! m lu? i: is on? ??i th? i
aj ?tem of ? mtrol i > admlnial ratl?
flclaia publlclt) which i.- not only ?-"???1 In
it ei;. i,,n tut nlshes tbe dal i for a h
? a? lion ma.v h.
u , t.i t., i,,i mu?ate Imm?diat? i
' d?finit? ?- ? polio ' .a ? . In tl na. ? 1th
atlona thai behai ? ih? mselves
a.??i w hlch i ?n,i. in no menai ?? **.?'? *
? iiv potential in an cori?
w hlch i of gi ?at sise .i vi-, well man
?iL.ii. shall aim nol at theli d?*sti
b t .?i their regulation and supervision, so
thai ih? government shall control th. m lu
; ishlon as ami ly t? nurd the iti
terests of the a h??l?- public. In?
,1-icei s. ,-on-nm.i and wagewoi k-1 -
This rontrol ?should, it necessary, be
pushed In extrem? ease* t?? th?* polal "'
txercialng control <?v?r ?monopoly pri?es? hr
rates on rsllwsya ar* now controlled, ?i
though thil Is i,,t a power thai slioul?! "?'
lisi-d When It is possible to av??i?l it I ?"'
law should be ii.-ar, unambiguous, certain,
so thai honest men rosy noi ?n?1 that """
wittingly the] hav.? violated it.
In sh rt. out aim should be not to '?'
bul effective!) and In th'.!.>ughK<>tnf*
ishion t?? regulate at??l control. In the ?pub?
lic Interest, th* ?great instruim-ntalltl't* <?f
modern busin.-ss, which It I? destructive
of ih? general welfare of th.? ?community
i?. >. and w i Ich nevertheless It a
vitally neceseary to that ?general welfare to
i? ?ii i ?i? and ? <>?i i ? l
Competition will remain us a very ,rn
portant factor when on???? tee hav?- ?l?
?troyed the unfair business ?methods, the
criminel Interf?rent** ?rita tita right*1 ??f
?other? which alone enabled certain ?wollen
I combinations to crush out th?lr rompetlt-tws
?u. ?l. Incidentally, the "ronservsttve*
will do well t?? remember that ties? unfair
and Iniquitous ?methods by great master?
?.( ?-??ri-orat.- capital nave atone m-sro '??
1 cause popular dis? ??nt'-nt with the propertied
, ;, .- than all the oration* of all the
rator* In th<- country put to
? r.
a
; JOHN ZELLER CONVICTED
Former Sheriff of Hudson Coun?
ty Found Guilty of Grafting.
John /?-ii? r. former sheriff <?f ?Hudson
? ??m ty, an?! the "boss" of <'utt.-nburg In
the paimv days of racing was convicted
last night ?it: an indictment charging ?COn
I spirscy t?i defraud th* county. Robert
Metncke, who was Indicted with him, was
a?-.|iiitt? d
Zellei g.iv? |1,00I bail to appear for sin
,'ti November -'?"?? The minimum pen?
alty Is eighteen months' Imprisonment and
the maximum three year? and H,0N tine,
i in- conviction made ?? profound Unpreaaloa
?m ?half i dosen men recently Indicted for
similar .?tf- n< ? ? and who were In the ?ourt
room w in n the rerdlcl was brought in.
Th? Indlctmenl a? ?a ?.i Zeller, u? Incke,
loseph O'Donnell and August Metiinger
with carryini out ?? co?rrupt sgreemenl ? ?
.o Hudson County by the sppoint?
m-in ol M-t/in lerfc of th?- Hud?
-m Count) ?Board of ??Slections, of wtUch
y., i ??> ha* h?-? n foi ? ?-ars th? chairman,
i ndlspute i fact ?jxrovi -i w? i ? ?the app^nt?
-...?,i ??t Metxlnger a- a clerk <?f the ??!? ??
lions I? ar?! in August, ttot, and thai the
? . paid fit for Metsing? r's service? na
ectloi : ? lei k in August. S?-pt--?n
? ictober an?! Nov'embei. It I, l le w , ?
m ? .? ?', ? (
th*, h'l ?lav s in all, al $?". a da v .
Mel nnell were wlti ?
?i the itati Th? Indi? | nenl ?.iinst .
Met?
did no work as
I .i. had ii'-v, ?
i th?--- and didn't know a here it
? I ? ary of ,
il"- ?h ? ti- ' Metsinger ?
it po iltlvely ?
? ? Ii - ? i Mi '/?'
?Seller t? itlfk d
. he b ? m txtnger .it ?: ?
board ' ? man he had app? Int? ?i as i
1 clerk ? ird Mi txinger ?ashed me :
Seller, "and
to tal ? ay warraai
? bank ?. is ah<?iit ?
? arri? ?i and wanted to ?ave mon? ?. "
TAKES UP NATIONAL HEALTH
Dr. Ewing Urges Immedite Es?
tablishment of Bureau.
In the annual gftlrsss Si ?AS anniversary
! meeting of the New York A'-ademy <>f
I .M.diclne last night Dr. Jam??? Balnf. pro
? f.syor of pathology and research at Cot?
I n. 11 .M??ll?al College, took occasion to rrltl
??las President Taft Iiecau-.? Ire held a p'.b
llc hearing on th?? bill to tafshWsh a na
llOnal ?lepattment of health.
, I>r. Bering complained bitterly through?
out his iiddresR that the American public
?-en? rally was out of sympathy with the
medical profession. Of that attltiul?- he
i bought the raoM conspicuous Indication
wa* In connection with the recently pro
ppStrd bill I'? ?*?tablisli a natl'inul il'iai'
ment of health.
The national government," ?said he, "htm
;it last : wakened to the nec?>s?itv Of a na?
ilon, il Mireeu .?i health, stt-sh as im?? long
I In other civilized countries Tot,
Instead <<f going ahead with it. are bars
Hi,- astonishing tmeetacio of Um Prsskn nt
Of ? ,. L'nltSd Stales holding a public ?;?"ir
ing t<? <l??bate th.- question.''
Th.- public's dlstrutd of th? m.-?ll?al j.ro
feaaloQ, ?aid Dr. ?Swing, ?Jhow**d plainly
also In its ?iuppoii of all manner of m?"1i
c-il ?ults. "It ?hOWB, too," ?AS continued,
"in Ihe wlil.' extension of the ?'hrisllin
Seien??, movement, and in the aravering
front of legislatures, which no longer stand
s? a in m defence ??f the public health
i against the irregular and Incompetent p**ac?
; lltloner? of medicine.
"Finally, puhHc aenUtnenl stilt -erm'ts
the Health Commissioner "f ti.?? ?Stele of
New York to be replaced every fSW year*,
ai'-ordlng to the rules of poHtlcal pat?on
? ?Age, and with Asiatic ?bolera at our ?loors.
We have Just WiUMSSSd lb'- il!stiiigu|s)|'ed
health offl?*er ?.f the Port of Now Tort
-?:?? i?-,t? <i to a mock Inveetlgatioa by g
! legal adventurer and a medi?t*al!y tmla?
i formed Jurist."
HIST! BEER KEGS IN ARMORY
Steward of 7th Regiment Haled to
Court, but Is Discharged.
William Prince, rtswsrd >r t1'? Ttl
meal Ai*mory, ?;.s <s**nl***asd Is the York
vin?, court yesterday gnirnlng, charged
w i t ti violating ?Jsctlon UBS of the Penal
Code, wltlch make? Il g mbtdemeenor to
due? mi;?*, spiritous liquors or malt
:? eragtti ;mo ?ny armor) o; ?.-serai, ?m-i
lea* proscribed foi msdiclnel puipooe?."
The chergs wa? made by Detsctlve .lohn:
. - vv I.n -,ii.l that tntS at night on Oc?
lob. r .'I h>- saw two hot r kgam dell
at ti?- armory, snd Mtei ?es Prince'? Bar
n the di ivi-i - rot ? Ipl book. ? k
?Gordon Battle, who la ? rnembsr ??f the]
Tib Regiment, appeared a? eounsel for
Pr-nce. Mr. Battle asked Shielda If i.
km ? S hat was in i lie kl
? St aeM ghleldi
i?:- herged," ?saM Magistrats Braea.
Ami Mr. Manic and lerere] other mem
ben ..f the regiment uim were In ?<>uit
.- unit-il an?) departed
new cus for ws
Senate Hears Scheme to Permit
Small Combinations.
?COMMISSION RULE URGED
; Another Plan Would Have Oi.
gantic Corporations Controlled
by Tax on Capital.
Washington. Nov. !<* The Senat? ? 0_.
mtttee <-n in?- ? mere?, whkh ,.
I'.'lulling into the tru.?i problem, r?.??,?,??,'
t ?. - ! .-i *. ? tin- first concrete "-?Kg'-stion? tn,
n w legislation designed to control gljomti?
combinations without hampering !"Kltlmata
business organizations.
X.i<-h.'itiali 'I'. Vlnaon, ?,f Huntington, \f
\ a , ?uggested 'h? ?organisation of nepg.
rate federal ?rommleelrns to ?leal with ba
Coal. si??!, lumber and oil in?lustries, W|tk
tOWOt b> authorize small combina lions in!
agreement* for s,.ning their product? w
operating th? propi-rti- -
A mathod ? f tr'i-t re?gulatlon through a
graduated tax on the capital sto? k ?,f ,-?..
,-?-?! by W. S D-?m.
n-l. an attorney of Minneapolis. Mr. thru?,
nel -laiil su, h g tax, Increasing In propsr?
"tion to the amount of capital, would tm.
e.-nt rnonop? ly an?l stimulate "??mp.-tltli?
from smalbr concerns that would not U
?hamperad i>-, the bao?y tax.
Th? ?Senate committee pursued a cour?*
of questioning that Indicated a desir? to
fin?! out whether any <?' the m? n --.ho op.
I'.afiil to-dsy favor?-?! government ?onttoi
??f prleee Mr, vinso-a ?ai?i his ?scheme for
?i federal coal mine commission dM n?>t
?on?? mp!at.ni rol of prl? ? -> \ ?? ira] , on
petlttoa would ?be ?stimulated, iie -aid, i*
ttie sinall <iai mine op?-rators were i*??.
mltted to make reasons ble cmnblnatisai
in order ??> reduce expenac* ami market
their ?coal inoro cheaply.
Mr. Dwfnnel, who ?proposed the *>,i??r>j
?tax on capital st?i<k, declared the | ? ?un
(.?nations would MM b?- abb- to pa-- tbta
tax on to ?the consumer, ?because sn Increaaj
m prie* would Icing into operation at on?*?
?many small ?concerns ?that would n?t be
?-mb.il rasse?! by In?? big t
I: every prayer of th? government
the United Stats* Steei corp-txa.
tion Is granted," sal?l Mr. ?iwtnnel, "| dn
not aiiti.ipat?- that tha price <?f ?teei raiu
will ?1?? lin?- from flf. a ton. even though It
?ost bul ?1*- a t??n to make them, SI ha?
been publicly stated. An ad?quat* tax on
big ? a pita! Meek w?>ui?i for.-e moderati
asi?:? ? empetitlon."
Saimi-'l I'liiemr ?r. of New York. m!in
prepared for tl ? ?federation a report
upon t legislation, has h?en la?
vii',1 to appear before the ?committee Sat?
urday.
SUNDAY'S NEW-YORK TRIBUNE
Mailed anywhere in the United Statt?
for $2.50 a year
^ffatagmytyj
A Reminder to Business Men Who Wish to Give
Something at Christmas That Will Be Prized?
GIVE FURS
And Give Them Now So That Wife or Daughter
Can Wear Them to the Horse Show and Opera
[f von love camping, the forests, streami and fields long ago gave you some
secrets of their swarming inhabitants.
You can fell ;? raccoon from a fox. a beaver from a mole, a wolf from a
wildcat
But can you tell then; after their warm furry pelts have
been dressed and dyed and shaped into luxurious, soft, beau?
tiful garments for your w'fe, daughter, sister to wear?
Not many men know this, so somebody must know
for them. The Wanamaker Store has fur experts who
pick flawless furs from all that tlit* hunters in many lands
send out to the cities to sell.
The Wanamaker Store restricts its selling t? ? genuine
furs, honestly named.
Our prices arc moderate because we ?have no fur
?house-and-help expenses in summer.
Choice of furs is intcn stilly and \ i ry in (':ss:tiv. hc
cause each fur is different : hut strange as it may seem, in
many shops only <>n?' or two scarfs or muffs arc shown al
a price. Ihre there.are a number of furs, and ?sometimes
several styles at a juice from which to choose.
Coats Made of Cenuine Shetland Sealskin
will ?serve as examples. There an- sizes 84 to 42, all at the
one price of $.900. Coats of the same ?beautiful fur will
he made to order up to si/t Mi. also at ?$500. Such seal
coats are a standard of elegance in clothes, just as dia?
monds are in jewelry. Fur Salons, Second floor, Old Building.
,i
JOHN WANAMAKER
Formerly A. T. Stewart & Co., Broadway. Fourth Avenue, Eighth to Tenth Street.
WANAMAKER'S.
WANAMAKER-S.
WANAMAKERS.
WANAMAKERS.
Who Was There That You Knew?
In Hie dim ranks of tliose who faced the grim cam
perhaps there was one who was dear to you; perhaps \
tun would like to conic lace l<> ?'.ice with father or
uncle or friend in the
tP?otogmp?ic
?fQstory of t?e
Cit?ifwar
Y?, round ner
'lis own kiddisli
Brother
[ace;"
with
Prof
William Silkwortli. ??I i-ong Branch, X. .).,
was amazed to sei in one picture not Olli) hin
brother and his old comrad-ea; Mrs. Stella Wilson \\
Saratoga, X. V.? almosl wep\ as she found her fatheT
NreM York: Mrs. Chas. S. Curtiss, of Detroit, lo
ban I a1 Antietam: Captain '.ivin, of Philadelp
dozen comrades in the "Zouav?es d\Afrique*" Mrs. John Abrams, Saugerties, X
Gen. Meadc: !.. Osborn, a newspaper editor of Red River Valley, Minn., met ^^^^^^^^ ^^^
Lowe, fainoiis scieutist, was overjoyed to Mud photographs of himself al Fair Oaks in the first war balloon of history;
John A. Vates, of Rutherford, X. .1.. recognized his brother at a glance. And so thc\ come. Each day there are
more. It', after yon gel your set, you find in it a picture of any relative, write and let us know and we will give yon,
free, ?in original photograph of that particular picture, which you can frame.
3800 Photographs~-A Million-Word History
Taken by Mathcw Brady, martyr photographer, and his followers
while the Civil War wat- goin^ on?lost for nearly fifty years?now found
again, carefully arranged, carefully explained and rr.arvelously reproduced.
Here is presented for the first time* and lor all time that vast moving
panorama of 50 years ago?enabling you to ga/e into the very faces, view
Mil I III? OMWINI
the very scenes of the most important, tragic and heroic period in the
history of this Republic. With the photographs is a newly written word
story of the Civil War?as different from the old date-map-school?
room history as these actual photographs are different from mere
imaginings.
BATTI.K?
i la, ,it,i ii iinntug, t 'nlon *ui i?i I -
. - , i ? -
A I i?? ?if ihr I "ln.l .1? I -? 1,1, - : ! lit* drill
.
?,i ?Bull itun. lfi..?i\ k
i Km \l
i'lrllan'i i???vs building b
raged; Hund???<:.?? i ??
graph?
\<>i ' I No *. KAR* ?il ?.III M N IR.
'
?
I I ??? <-f tin
Photograph? Federa
.f bal R< ' igt
ii^iit. Th?- ?i- ad n. i
?
irtal v\. ? ? i * ? ?.
Are, Artillen In
'? ?
ll'll'ill ? ,|h
\<?l I. I HE l>Kl l-l \ I. Ii\ III I -
? i ,,,iii, i mm ..?* i ? ??
\ I ,\\ ?>f tlii- I'li.?
lagraphai ? Irani
..' i,?, k
"i ? " ' ?i -',- ?.
? ?
'nt th?
gum undi - ?ii? ?,? I ir? r- ?? ?bun
? ? ?
He; 1
?. . it?
lo th* 1
utogru phi
\ <?t i I III CAVALRY. n ?
? i ?
ipera .ni'i
int* A Fern of Mir ri?,.lour.i|ii?>.
. .? ; did i-? i'?.- militai
? i? i > at th?
Roab) m th? ml?t?i <-r lil?
n train
....
v , 'MHI.lli ??!
A mounted r? ?i ?
t ? ? ?
Mi ? rt?
and ol !n?i lead? r?; 11
ph ?grapha
Mil .*.. KUKTH \M> IRTILLKRY.
? itoi t t a I
behind I irk? A
I i-M ?if lili- I'llilt OK r;??>lls -
-
i al tie; I art llei ?> moi emenl
' ?
; , ?.-. . Igtol
.
i hiiviin " gun - 1 .?
Dutch
?mbardmeni
? ?'. t-',,i, uahlng up .?
.11., ? '.?!: f? . ,.nf, ,i -
innel Hat
,1 f.ills.
VOI . ?? ?III N \\ II *
Ida \ l ??<? <?f ?'"?
Phatagrapbat Ralclah blockad? i
Jack tar? working tb? "Wlaaahlcko? -
'.???>. ,'iil'k {,-? IV l.'i.itH Mil ?:
i ilp? ??( w .n . si lerat? i ? ma
Th? Cre* of il?.- Monitor" aftei it
i'?i?i.?i gunboat? entrapped Building th*
?i.?m thai i-av-,1 ?
torpedo boa I. I'l.---- rid i il -nu . v
outhful "powder-monk
?H und n I? mor? nu
vol. ;. ri:i*?iv* \m> n??*i'ii\t
???? ? ,?f ?ri
unded A i m ??f
III?. I'lK't<igr:,|>li?s: Bl?t>-ninth N ?
?n,-,, in ?ti?' Charleaton Caatle; Hundr I*
? ?r Conf?d?ral? ptivoner* In Chicago; In?
?Ide i he i ?i fedai ?tu Imw Llbb)
ndani Inald? ?Vnd? ? ?mm ii;
v! \, ? i. fonfi'd-trate prlaonar* ?m ? ?
. laaulnjaj ration? In Anderaon
h? "!?? adline" ai And? ?
?rtlal i:o in the Held;
Bio il I ?ni;I '
vi , g the re, oi ?!?< i ?i.? ' ata i
H .?ini. Ambulanrta removln? tb?
Icaburg ? ???. oundad .- 11
nilnelon ladle* ut i"
I ImxM to tl
m?re ? n- i? photograoK.
VOL. *? S M HUT HKRVICR \M) ?.??1.
l>lll{ l.HK. Chapt? i-j tha? ?
niiiii il.. ??< ?-n? s ?,f ?rarfara obtaining In?
formal Ion t tu ??'lu ti ?cou! - ,, ? ...
a? Hug ??n I'M.?
\ Fem et n?e PtMttocrapba:
fronl
Idler?; Hundred*
?
? ? . \, ? t. rif -?i r"??
?i v.??ik confed?
ling; i; ,1 RcClatlMi
l'rooo?
i? the n?
photo
? .uni? bulldll - Beef
kill? r? Dig.
the Bat 11? , f g
.,mpa: Hun.
? - ? pli?.
\<ll I TOI ll?\ AM? Il ???{I IM t
??i Bl i t mi ?.? w v .
?pired ? might) confit? i tha? . mpha
tu t? ?I nppo
M!.- ?Vil ?' M il'-tllil?. phOtO
I* if th? v
h ?.? bet n la ki h f?>i i li- puri i '? ? -i? at
t Ute, Bot?
P*riendahlp
tl ?? f1t?t
?
\u? in Until - \M? Il IDRM
? . ? '?' ?'1,-IUI' if-1
dl* >? mpa -
? ,,1|, ?. ? '.-mi?:, te l,i,,.-rii.
*
o pa on bol h A
.ill th?- ? ? t ?um,- arm) an?l co
lion? i '?"ni?!?' ? ;<i! k'-'?" rai .?fn. ? ???
('?itii
. 28 :? ?
New Wanamaker Club Now Forming
You Cannot Get the Club Prie- ?j! ? ? ^ Wh j g
or Terms Anywhere Else ?1-_o "**- TT !_*_2S
7 Cents a Day Pays for It
^roufifhthe Wanamaker Hook Club, and then only, you esn
whole ?8800 pictures in 10 **umptu?oufl volumes with the
million-wonl ln\toi\ for less than I cent a picture ami
yon pay for it at the rate of 7 Cents I tlav. Come
into the store jnid look at Ihe pictnr? v or send this
coupon without money for free 82-page sanijilc hook
containing ?_>!? of the picture, and full particulars.
If You Can?
not Call Send
the Coupon
Broadway?
Tenth Street
m r -?'
.loin? Wanamaker. Sew lark
IKt.V.. meat*.
^0***^ ,?,, ,,.. .o.i.l ne I KM:, ?ampie
^^e**^ ,.f n,.. |>hi?lo*rnphi< Ill-lory ?>'
t0^ Ihe (Uli War including <? pr..du.'t?.?n* ?l
i.., ?it,, lb? *,"'\.'\
.,< Ill- pl.tlll^H At?"
t-ll III. II??'.? I , ,
in-m.- I h rough rot? i i;.??>k riu?-.
Nan?. Aiitae?
i a ???? .:t i"** arts? .?n?i little p*)'

New-York tribune. [volume], November 17, 1911, Page 4, Image 4
About New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924

Connect with the Library

Find Us On

Subscribe & Comment

Download & Play

Questions

New-York tribune. [volume], November 17, 1911, Page 4, Image 4 About New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924

Connect with the Library

Find Us On

Subscribe & Comment

Download & Play

Questions

New-York tribune. [volume], November 17, 1911, Page 4, Image 4
About New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924