New-York tribune. [volume], November 03, 1915, Image 1

About New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924

Image provided by: Library of Congress, Washington, DC

                
GUARANTEE
Your Money Back
If You Want It.
??ce Editori?! Pa|e, Kir?t Column.
Ntv? fflutk
WtVmu
WEATHER
F4IK TO-D4T Utt t?> Moaaowi
I I?.HT 44 r?r vtiMiK.
lntsni*! ? Temperature?:
ll??>. ?Mi los? 47.
lull report nn Is?? II
First to Last ? the Truth: Xews - Editorials -Advertisement*
Vol. LXXV ?Vo- 23,189.
4 <?l>) rl?hl. I?l*.
li, Th? lui.?,??? laaaatataaa.1
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 19115.
o 0
PRICE ONE CENT
In < i?T of Nets > or* g?ata, .lerne* ? Ht ?n.i II?tvokea
H-f-tHIKi? [HO (I.MS.
Suffrage Loses in New York by 180,000;
Constitution Killed; Tammany Sweeps City
AJXIES W?LL
SAVE SERKL
SAYS ?SQUI
Br.tish Premier
premely Confide
of Victory.
ADWTSFAILUR1
indardanell
Tells How Greece As
for 150.000 Allied Troc
Then Drew Back.
.'Or C?ba? K T??* TV Min? ',
London, Nov. 2.?It Is rlov
whither the Houte oi Commoni
tv?r more crowded Of wheth
?p44>?T??h ?-a? ever awat- J with gr
or more eager ar.x.e'y or in a
?Jaojjrietl sunosphere a? wa? the
to-day when PlSJB ?er Asquith
hi? long expected andres? OB the
The inadequate a:, mmoilatior
thi Houie wai ?trainod to Um H
molt, while the st rangers*, pi
public and diplomatic gal":cries
parked to luffocetion. Even Cal
rrur.'.itcri had to sit on the floor,
ir-,5 to there b??;ng no room on
front oench.
Prtmier Atqu-th teemed the
?idtad pert or. prcer.t To all am
i:.?? t?* l .' I haso been about to
MSI? ?articular'? unlr.ter???'
as eoorti H
Lloyd Grcrg:? while ?saitiac,
itiwtred al rot
nfity of thr No! al Tcture
lery with the quip that he hadn't
lir-it to go there 1 A trer
dooi rerri - - ? Mm 0
h? rci
On the whole, according to the t.
?{ aesavson rwarol,
ipeech ?itisSed a majority of
Hcuee. Thi : of his add:
rt\".*vpc! the gei
srou?. bat there
?omi he? : ?? ?I ' ?' '??hen h? ?tated,
ftrdi.'is' '
mtr.t tt a whole iicided to undert
tht eipeditior. det .i.ubts
-ner. ther? pi.
V?'. nival adviser."
Atmoiphtre Hrcoirie? Icy.
Th? ftrit petal to ?licit oataaoli
ail tht deciarati'.n that the All
woold net ?,.o* S. rhia to become
prty of the ?ir.i??*-r as I oslarious c?
tinir.on of Gonaaa?i Aastria and P
fir.i," but later the atmosph?re
cirri? icy ?hur? he referred to diff
encit ir. th? I th Lot rt^atttiag comp
loi-j- mUiUrv ?er-, ice The point wh
ret'.', y (??.rre i .-? -.va* his t
of the phra.?a "1 ?till ?tick at OOth|
in order to win the war."
Thi toaapoataeaa shoon which roci
th? Houte ?t tl I? sentence wer? ,
ntwed wher. he riec'.ured that, de?p
tht terrible respomibili'y, he ?oi
not reugn or ?loft the burden of o:P
te lor.g ai he enjoyed health and t
?to-.?.ier.ee of the King and the < oi
aoni. Hi? rerrara that the committ
ef the r?b ? ,. charged with the ttral
?fie conduct of th? -,v.vr should not
l?tii than throa ?i more than five m
era. approval, a? did hie etat
: ' man thon] i not I
?free-, to taliat until the ut.marm
rte-rether, the ?pooefa ??? tvpical
*??*??? ? usual when 1
gSJlj bettln hlmaelf. he carriel tl
???a? a th h.m The next ?poaki
? r.avs-ard Cart ? was ei
????I-' tal bain
"???I hie: that Henry (naplin. i
?V i1''?"' hr?d of tht B?n-oataUi
?" ? I fol aw,
Ne? ?lppoMtU.n Leader.
ml}*} ' ' i - lOHOOeSI ii
la of a
(Terence
?nainder o' the Cabin?
aeVt'j ' m?re ' "'? ?*??!
?<???? to ti.?- hi beoa thoarh
->* l<> ?r?i">,' I
?|?rou .
"?dure. , -. ,ul th, drll fore?
J*?'-' - ?nd the moil hdrquat
"??"I Me.
ed a warm ova
Mi? '' '" !("' '" ' '"??'?
(at? ?PPearanc? in the Ilmir* o
patent ? ? - hi? recent lllmsa. .<
?th. W', 'n *xP?-??""on of
HttA \'Y1F ,0 K'n;? ';' '??' ""' ai
"V? the Houte that the Kin/ wai
2?Lmin5 r weil ?? c'j;iid b? ??
??ri?? ' h" injur"i w?r? ?o'
No I rlminal. No Penitent.
?,.. * Premier's remark? concerning
2 war w?r< prefaced by the remark
ZL,, '''?'' ?>??? dela.ed by
4aatt?,,Ur',,,'! ovrr w4"'v> h? had BO
??SJaH-ut?, i*0"1'' d ""W-nt mi-;.
?2*r??' or... he continued, not the
?wJb?? ??PecUtion? of those rha
?asCV ' ouv:ht ,0 *PVe*T as a erim
B^,; ? Penitent in a whit? ?heat
eitk?7'r' dd not Propos? to a?iopt
kr*ivl ?tV'u<,<' Ht Intended to de
IrJV* f?r ?? poeaibl? the actual and
?tiv?V^?' P0,'??on to the nation,
??ajaT '? ?? determined to-day as it
?*??' h?et to protecute th? war 'o
U*ltt"ai?-? ?aaaaa? m. aolaaaa ?
Smith and Swann Lead
\ in Bis Victory for Tiger
_
PerkilM Defeated by 34.000 and Bowers by 50.000?
Aldermen Won for 1 ammany?City and Mu?
nicipal Court Pliices Go to Democrats.
? ammany made :i clean s-wrvp oi
'? ? ?i.\ and county tivkcts pester.
day. District Attorney, SherilT anci
, the Board of Aldermen went into th?
Democratic fold with large majori?
ties. The Tiger smiled in Tammany
Hall and Charles P. Murphy Faid the
votera had ?wept away the "time
worn Tammany bugaboo."
Judge Edward Swann, Democratic
eandidata fur Liistrict Attorney, won
over l>;strict Attorney Perkins by
about 34,000 plurality. Former As
aemblyman Alfred E. ?Smith, Tam
many candidate for Sheriff, beat his
opponent, Frank M. Bowers, by
about SO,000 votes. Frank Moss
polled about 23,000 votes, cutting
into Mr. Perkins's strength for
about that much, according to Re?
publican opinion.
The Beard of Aldermen went
strongly D?mocratie. The Republi?
cans lost in practically nil the close
dirtrict? In Manhattan, electing only
five aldermen from this borough.
Tammany elected three out of five
aldermen in Queens, the eight in The
Bronx, and the three in Richmond.
The Democrats elected twelve out of
twenty-four aldermen in Brooklyn.
The Democrats in the board will
number about fifty-four. The pres?
ent line-up In the honrd la 41 fusion
and 82 Dem?crata.
District Attorn?? Perkln. conceded
election before 10
"I concede Judg?. Swofltl'l election."
i, 'aad ho;.? his ??lminiatralion
muy be entirely satiifactory to himself
cd the r.eople of the county."
Mr. Perkins sent a telegram to h's i
lOCeeaaor wish,m; him meces,
Samuel S, K?nif, chairman of tha
Ri ; ibli? an < !oeat? ? ommittee, had
?.i the election o? Jadee Swann,
and "Ai" Smith, as Sheriff, a? earl*/ an
. o'clock. At that time Mr Koenig
rave Smith lO.Odo plurality and Sw_nn
Trank Mo??, former A?si*Unt District
Attorney, polled a heavier vote than hi?
opponent expected, although he ran
only ,n the dim distance behind Perkins
and Sw.nn. I.;?*.? re?uitg showed a vote
of about 20,000 for Moss.
When asked if he had anything to
?ay about Mr. Moss, Diatrict Attorney
Pcrkin? replied:
"1 had nothing to pay about him dur?
ing the campaign and I don't wish to
have anything to i-ay about him now."
Republican* considered that the Mos?
vo".|, eami largel] from their party, and
mude the election of Jud(,'u Swann
doubly a??ured.
Jii.lup Swan, expressed himself a?
frai : ed that he hnd met with the
approval of the people.
"i am '?? aible ni the trust reposed in
me," lio ?aid. "and I will adminipter the
? fice of Diatlict Attorney so a? to sat'e
. si :?l 'iic interests <?f all the people."
riel F. Murphy received the returns
eaecotive offices. He ,s?ued a
''..renient, ir. which he said:
"The gratifying result? of the cice?
r?n show that the people cannot al?
ways be deceived by the old, time-worn
Tamraanj btur.be. a.? an issue. The
in of Judge Sw.inn and Mr. Smith
111, ans a choice of two avowed ~am
men who have been elected a?
?uch. I am sure that their administra?
tioni will be ??tisfactory to all who
rote ! for thl m."
Seven hundred election dlstrietl out
(? a total ol" M!'.1 in Manhattan showed
the following vote for Sheriff:
.103.?.47
. '
. Pro-. 1. 4,115
The drift of the vote for Sheriff was
fhown 1:1 the earliest re'in ns. "hj
Aral 21 election dlatrieti counted in
Manhattan, out of a total of ?s.9 di?
tricts. cave Smith (Dem.), _.M'3; Uow
?rs 'Tve'i'-). 1.1-1"'; Halpi" iProg.l, MM.
f ontlnnril mi pan.? t, ?rteliinin I .
BENNET WINS
FROM HEA
Republicans Carry
Congress District ? I
elect 3 Candidates.
William S. Bennet placed the
New York Congress District in
j Republican column yesterdav by
.- Elaworth Healy, who mai
I ol ' I arles P, Muri.hy. I
major--;, of ?'? 00. The 23d distn
year ago gave a majority of 0,70
' h A. Goulden. the Democi
dat?
election of Mr. Rennet i?
guided ns a slap at the Wilson adi
>n, as the issue Involved i
* KClusively of national
'i m Demoerata asked for the elei
of Heal? to "uphold the hands
? ??.'. Wilson." The Republi?
made the tariff and other acts of
H Ison administration the target
their attacks.
Normally the 2,'id District is De
erotic, although considered a? deb:
ble ground by the Republicans. V
P ? | I? : ? U lia? : as the chief rea
for aal ag ' action of a Democ
the Heal? adh?rents expected him
win by a substantial majority.
The Republicans re-eleete. Rej
res in the SI I aod I 8th S
York districiH urid in the 24th Petits
vat, h D.strict. There was no Rep
I lean candidate in the 4th South <"a
lma Diatriet
Norman J. Would, the Republi?
I in tl a BOth New York Diatt
? ?racai ? i v ?
deal h ? ? ? ? ? Bereno K Payne,
.3d New ?ort District - William
ran.
?., i York District B. S. Sni
Republi
New York District Norman
(ion. , an.
. l?anla District Dr. Hi
i y K. 1 en pie, Republican.
4th South Carolina District Samt
hol?, 1 'eniocriit.
DEMOCRATS WIN"
KENTUCKY FIGH
Capture Both Branches of Legi'
lature Stanley (iovernor.
Louisville Ky., Nov. 2. Der.".era
aitei one of the hardest tights
??ears, carried Kentucky to-day, elec.m
formel I o.'.gressman A. 0. Stanley ' Ol
et'i.f b| an ?stimated majority of 10
000 over Edwin P. Morrow, the Kepul
lican nominee
llotl. hi.un he* of the Legielatut
aril] be Dw.ct.tll. I. several .1 th
judicial races nturn? vveie not avail
able, but indicate that the entire Htat
ticket was elected In Louiavilla the en
t re judicial ar.ii Council ticket v*a
elected by 1,100 majontv.
To-day's election marked th? ?nd o
the Progressive party in Kentucky
On!* a few vetee were polled by thi
lloe?e in Loulavllle, th.e ?tronghol?,
of the Progressive party.
The bsggest surprise of the day wai
in Morrow eerrjrtaa Fapotta County, on?
of the big Democratic counties a. th?
state The Stanley leader?, however,
believed that the intense interest there
over the ?'lection of the city commis?
sioners on a non-partisan platform
would affect the result materially.
The Demorr?'..e lea?!ers attribute
; much of the credit of th? victory to the
. national administration. This was the
! plane upon whir'i the fight was made
I by th? Democrat?. On th? other hand.
? the Republican ?peckers failed to MM.il
j vhe President, but turned their gun?
| upon the administration of the stat?'*
affairs durlnjc '--? ???*? four yaar?.
PENNSYLVANIA
ANTI BY 150,000
Republicans Elect Mayor
in Philadelphia and
Sweep City.
(llv TtllgripS to Til Tr'i -
Philadelphia, Nov. 2. -Woman suf?
frage was defeated in th * state to-day
by a majority conservatively estiqiated
as between lolU'OO and 1 i",.4,i>i>?l. It Is
believed that the majority in this city
and county will be about 100,000
against tho amendment. The re?
turns were very slow in com?
ing In, owing to the mat,y ?put
t rkf-ts nnd th? wrangling of election
officials In some wards of the city
son.<? of the ballots were ten foot Ion?-.
The majority airains? suffrage in the
state, not inclading Pittabargh an?!
Philad? i ? ii. wi.i be probably not more
than 86,QOO. In Allegheay I unity, em?
bracing Pittabargh, the majority trill
be 20,000, In Philadelphia County '-he
majority against will be 100,000,
Kataraa iodieats tin? ?lection of
Thomas B. Smith, Republican, as
Mayor of Philadelphia, by a majority
of B0,<. over Georg? D. Portar, in?
dependent nominee. The elect.on was
. "f the me?! specluculai in year?.
Rudolph Blankenbarg, th? seventy
three-year-old Mayor, rode about the
city in an automobile accompanied t>y
a detail of mounted policemen in hi?
efforts to bring about an honest elec?
tion. It is ?aid that warrants will he
nworn out to-morrow for three mum
cipa] oi^icer?;, ehargiag them with \io
Istios of the Sham law in ordering
ti- | ?il,ce into polling place?.
Th? vote in the state for the Su
portor Court judge? resulte?! in the
elect on of Jadgoa (>r!.??iy and Heed
and th?? election of J. Henry Williams,
of this c-.ty.
\ itaat District Attorney Joseph
P, Rogar? was elected to ?me of the
two vacancies in Common Plea? Court
Nltmboi Two. for the other ?eat the
balloting was divided between City
tor Ryan, Heary N", Wooool and
Fredariek B. Prako with the reiulta
still in doubt.
,- uccessi'ul candidates on the Repub?
lican ticket are: Thoma? B. Smith,
mayor] John P. CoBBOlly. city ?olid
tor; Jame* Hsslott. recorder of ?ire.:-.
Harry Baaalay, 11 ?riff: \\ illism R
]\i, gnt, eoroner; .lohn oi Walton, city
llar; Robert J. Moon .inn David
Scott, counts- cii'iim.? liOBOl'?. Ceorge
?" Hol moa, Independent, was ?looted
minority member of the board of
, , int y commis- iivner*.
? Republican organization elected
,,', ,,ver whelming majoi.ty of the cou??
cilmaaic candidate?, and win have
? Otaplot? control of the city govern?
ment, in contrast with the ntuation
prevailing during the la?t four yean.
Ii complete return* indicate a big
rr.a;ority of the four amendment?
voted for throughout the state, with
the exception of the woman auftrage
amendaient.
The Republican organization candi
dH*e? for Mayor and other office? v.-ra
elected by between 70,000 and 80,000
majority.
Six not calls w? re necessary to nail
the not? that occurred whoa the jubi
hint Republic?'1 paraiiet? clashed with
their oppoaeaU late to-night.
The satfragista polled ? much la'*?r
vote thai, ?ra? ?apoetatt, and probably
carried several countie?, the !?rge?i of
which n Luzerne Suffrage leader?,
however, refused to be disheartened,
and ara planning a monater meeting
tin* city to-morrow evening, when they
-ail' ??.?lebrate 'he "conquering of wh?t
a ?hort time ?go ?.-Vine?! an overwhelm?
ing OMOOitios of prejudice and ignor?
ance."
CONSTITUTION
SNOWED UNDE?
BY 400.O0C
Immense Adverse
Vote Rolled Up All
Over State.
TAMMANY AIDS
DEFEAT IN CIT\
New York City Alone Give?
2.50,000 Majority Against
Work of Convention.
The proposed new constitution wa
overwhelmingly defeated. Incom
plete returns early this mornini
indicated a majority of abou
400,000 against it. A statement is
sued at Republican State Head
quarters at midnight conceded it
defeat by 200,000.
New York City cast a tremendou
vote against it. Bi?sed on the dis
tricts from which complete return
came in it was estimated that Nev
York City would roll up n majont;
of 250,000 against it
Brooklyn, where u majority for i
was expected, voted against it in th?
proportion of 2 4 to 1. In Manhnt
tan the Tammany work against i
?showed in big majorities. The bash
of Tammany's opposition was it;
charge that the ConstituConal Con
vention and refused to give th<
metropolis its just legislative repre
sentation.
Upstate there was bitter antagonlsn
toward the t.-.xatlon article, which, a!
thouch submitted separately, carrier
along with it opposition to the conati
'ution as a whole. There was also a
b.tter feeling on the part of hunters
fi?hermen, nature lovers and conserva?
tionists becau?e of the provision foi
s. nine-headed unpaid Conaervntion
3or(rd to replace, the present single,
hended department.
Organized labor In all p?rts of the
?fate took the attitude that the Con
?titutional Convention had betrayed
the interest? of the wage worker?.
Martial Law Feature Opposed.
Thi? wa? bu*ed on the widely circu?
lated opinion by Judge Cullen that In
time o? atrike military tribunals might
take over the trial of ca*es against
strikers arrested for rioting, dosjute
?he assumed priority of jurisdiction of
th? ?tat? court?. The labor union?
also felt that the social Justice feat?
ure? of the constitution at be?t went
.i very short distance toward relieving
conditions agrvinst which they com?
plained. They carried on a well or?
ganized campaign againat th? proposed
eonatitntiOB f;om the moment the con?
vention adjourned until yesterday.
Although all the important article?
in the new document were voted for
by a majority of Democrat? in the
convention a? well a? a majority of
Republican?, th? belief that it wa? "a
partisan constitution" rolled up thou?
sands of vetea against it.
The 'lefeat of the proposed new con?
stitution mean? that the sta'e will
continue under the pre?ert constitu?
tion. According to the provision? of
that d?cernent the Legislature of 1910
mint submit to the people next fall
the question whether there shall be
another Constitutional Convention in
l'J17.
The cost to th? people of the ?t?te
of the work which wa? defeated ?o
..verwhelmingly was about f 1.000.000.
The ipeeial election called by the
Democrat? in April, 1914, at which the
referendum wa? aubmitted, cost half
that ?urn. Th?? co?t of the convention
itself wa? another lfiOO.000.
I pstate Vote Strong Against It.
The vote on the constitution up?tste
?vas decidedly against it. Steuben. the
:;r?t county to be heard from, gave a
majority of 2.000 again** out of a total
veil of about M.000. Broome. a strong
Republican county, rolled up a majority
n?7M'n?t the constitution eatimated at
The vote on the other four question?
will net be completed for a day at
?ea?t. The returns ndicated that the
referendum ?. the $.'7.0?>0,000 bond
issue for the completion of the barge
canal would be passed No figures
were untamed at all on any of the
i ..ntim.?,1 on page 4. column 1
F. P. A.
A little while ago F. P A., in The Conning Tower,
printed the word? of an old sobbv soiig. Instantly an army of
contrihs rose up with word? of others.
He has an odd orgy of hitting on a theme that other people
have been treasuring up. It happened with Juvenile Fiction?
it's a!wav$ happening.
Oac? that might mean good luck?ever, twice. But when
it happens constantly it means that Mr. Frinklin P. Adams is a
citizen of prettv hroad humin utiderstandin?. Whicli. after
ill. Is whit i column conductor must he?or h?'i a inoiiologiit.
Have >ou contracted the F P. A. habit?
?the ?Tribune
First ta I^ast~tht Ttuth: S nut?t.diterials -Adiertitementt
m
NEW SUFFRAGE CAMPAIGN BEGUN
PROMPTLY AT 12:20 THIS MORNING
At twenty minutei past midnight the Press and Publicity Council
of the Empire State Campaign Committee left Room 310, In the Tribune
Building, where they had been receiving returns, and held a mass
meeting in front of the Franklin statue. George Middleton and Will
Irwin made speeches. It was the beginning of a new campaign for equal
suffrage in New York state.
A few minutes before Mrs. C?.rrie Chapman Catt had issued a call
for a mass meeting at Cocper Union, on Thursday night. "We are not
defeated. We arc only delayed," she said.
Said Dr. Anna Howard Shaw, "Thi3 has not been a defeat. We
have polled the largest number of votes ever cast for us In the United
States. We shall go on and win."
BAY STATE GOES
REPUBLICAN BY
NARROW MARGIN
McCall Defeats Walsh for
Governor by About
5,000 Majority.
[Hr TalefMiri te T ? T- ' .-.?
Boston, Nov. 2. Suffrage was defeat?
ed in the Bay State election to -day,
while the result of the contest for the
Governorship was in doubt late to
nii'ht. Apparently the Repoblloaai had
, redeemed the suite by ?-?ectiiig Sam?
uel W. Mcf'all over the Incumbent, Da?
vid I. \Va.??h, Democrat, by auout 5,00?)
vote?. Kepablioan lender? clam 12.000
, for McCal!.
In 93? out ?if 1,140 election prec'nct?
1 in the state, including Boston, McCall
! had IM.ISI vote* to 1X3,075 for Walsh.
Not included in thee figures was the
Itrong Republican city of Somervil'.?1.
?h ch waa count? d on to make a safe.
. lead f??r UoCU.
I The vote on ??iffrng? in these lim?
I pr?cinet? wa. 90,071 for to 171 li>
agaiiiet, which indictei that women
; failed to gain tho ballot by a majority
of 130,000.
Samuel W. McCal!, the Republican
candidate, issued the following ?'aie
ment late to-night:
"After ninny defeat? and much wan?
dering in the wilderness, Mn?*achu?ett*
! hr.? neon re leemed. Thi? is the greet?
; est Republican victory since John A.
' Andrew, the war Governor, wa? elected.
II Weald have been ?Bough to contend
1 airamst Governor W ileh alone, for,
with the exception of William K. Rus
, ?ell, lie is the most popular Democrat
wb. ha? aptienred in our state polities
since the Civil War. But there were
two other candidate? in the field, who
Wei*e?r1 verv energe'ie CMSoalene,
"The victory was due to the activity
and enthusiasm of the Republican? anil
to the potent ai?i that we reo .ved
fiom the Progressives, with CharlM
Sauner Bird and other leader? at their
head. 1 believe the re?u!t mean? very
: much to the nation."
Governor Walsh defeated Mr. McCall
. last year and Representative Gardner
? '-he year before by ???irtuc of the great
; ?trencth of the P'rotrressivi-*, who
i rolled up large totals for I hur'.es Sum?
mer Bird. Thi* year Bird BBpportad
McCall, but ssveral other former Pro
greaaivea, like MaKhew Hale, friend
of Roosevelt, went on the stump for '
Walsh. The rYogreeaivee had a can
didate, Nelson B. 'lark, who ran on
an anti-Catholic l??ue, but he fai'.e 1
to poll enough vote? to insure the Pro
gresslves retaining their standing as a
p. ftp,
There waa never any doubt a* to the
result of tho vote on the huffrate
issue. The suffragist? have admitted to,
themselves for weens 'hat ?hey would
b? beaten, but the re-ults far exceeded
even the most enthusiastic BBti'l
claim?. The liquor Interacts had their
effect, but all their work wa? in secret.
The entire Republican state ticket
was elected, as expected, Calvifl Cool?
iilge. president of taeeSenate. defee
ex-I.ieutenant Govern?. Edward P.
Hurry by about l.'?,000 vote?. The dif?
ference between the vote f'if Coolidg.
?nd that for McCall is accounte?! for
by the great personal popularity of
Walsh. Wale, ?cerned early in the even?
ing likely to return him for a third
term. The Legislature will be l'e
peblica. by a lare,, najaritv. Only
me Demecretii member t>f the Gov?
ern er*i Coeacil wa< elect? '.
The Republican* w?re inclined to look
on the re'ult of the election a* a re?
b?ke to Pr?sident Wrtaon, and when
the early r?'ums were favorable they
sad that they were ??taws ibowtng
whieh way the wind would blow in !.'1'V
Senator Week? gave out this itatement,
which h? ?tuck to, even ?luring the dark
hours When Wal?h was leading:
"The people are opposed, as this elec?
tion in Masai i i ?'? ?-. to the
international policies of the rational
administration. They want a protective
tariff; they in?i?t on a tariff law being
I; ?hey are BBpSSld to the las
Slexican policy. In many instances the
Continued on pa(? 4. SS0__O S
NEW YORK'S SUFFPAGE
VOTE BY COUNTIES
i-County Totals??,
County. Yes No. Dists.
Mis?.
Albany . ?.322 12,894 N
Allogaay . 2,239 1,29] 24
Bronx . 81.334 89,227 13
Broome . 6,51r5 6,'.-S'.? 13
Ch.'iutauqua... I,7M 6,122 r]
Chenango . 2,702 .l.i'.'T 9
Clinton . 1.3:3 2.068 2t
Coii.mbia . 1,429 1,920 21
Cortland . IJUt '.',144 7
I'el aw are . 1,920 ?2,990 25
Datchass. 2,433 4.021 ?
Eri? . 23,118 .12,2(52 17
Franklin . 2,:;il 2,985 ?
FnltOS . 1.954 1,957 21
I. . ' IM. 2,?:2 IJ?TI 6
Hamilton . ti ii 10
Jaffersos . 2.312 3,297 II
King? . 65,215 08,725 151
LOW!? . 221 45'.? 29
i ItingatOB _ 2.0i?7 3,491 I
Mii.-on . 2.314 3,010 24
Monroe . 19,601 23JM 7
Montgomery .. l,2-.l 1.226 30
IS . 4,3'i3 5,719 -
N'.-.v York. 78,032 101.598 129
Magars . I?09 3.5.S8
1 nenia . 6.833 lO.iiT i 49
Onoadaga . 13,331 14,878 M
Cm ario . ?337 1,325 4M
Orange . 1,771 2.397 7:}
Orieans . 2,140 2,840 -
Oowogo . 1,585 1.706 89
"'--?go . Ot.l 1,373 45
Oueens . 16,424 72r>,l.,.i 87
Rensselaer ... MM 8.i.?',4 2?)
Richmond . 5,073 6,392 7
Rockland . 627 632 32
St. Lawrer.ee... 4,310 5,396 4
Saratoga . 1,979 3,493 41
Si-hohari? _ 666 1494 12
Seneca . 746 1,385 17
St? ?ben . ?,400 12,800 32
[Suffolk . 3,752 4.340 49
Su 11, van . 2.149 2.229 19
Tloga . 1.322 1.754 14
Toiupkina ...'. 2,295 2.124 15
I'ls.ter . 1,296 2.312 61
Warren . 1.006 1.917 18
Washington ... 1,071 1,274 ??8
Wayne . 1.438 4,315
We?tehe?ter .. 15,152 18,170 49
Wyoming . 1,442 1,710 19
Yates . 209 388 1?
Total . 857,705 602,359 1,618
Total number of election district? In
?trite, 6,713.
TVE no cobhent;
ROOT'S MESSAGE
?'We All Have Our Disappoint
merits," Constitution Maker's
Sole Remark.
"I have no comment to make"
Seated at hi? bin library table In
his apartn- nts at 998 Fifth Avenue.
Elihu Root heard that the new con?
stitution had gone down to defeat last
n i ? h t ?ml was ??lent. If anything lie
rat up ?freighter in hi? high-bacn*? ?
chair and looked straight ahead. Only
the muscles of his face worked ?light?
ly an?l he puffed at his cigar In quick,
?h?rt jerks.
"No," he said, "I have no comment
to make. Certainly none until morn?
ing."
The shadow from the reading lamp
fell across hi? stirn, tet face Tho
gray hair looked grayer In the half
light of the ??ark, somberly furnittied
room. And the man who told th? .'?'.. ?
of New York the other day that this
measure win the su7ir?me effort of a
? ?jieiit in the service of the publi
?rant an smoking in silence.
"I hiive had none of the returns,"
he sail! presently, "What do you h*?ir
from woman suffrage and the As?
sembly?"
lie was told, and after a momert's
reflection ?aid:
"That Is too incomplete to allow of
any discussion. No, I shall have to
w.i,*. sBtll mornii.tr before I can ?av
anything. I'm ?orry not to make mme
of a ?tatostoat now.
"We all have our dieappointments,
you know," he ?aid.
NEW YORK C ITY VOTE ON CONST!
TUTION.
E. D.
If. roughs. Yes. No. Miaa'g.
Manhattan . 1.1.51 ? 14.151 11??
liront . 11,714 19,110 18
Broofclya .4l,oos 129.?78 105
line. n. . 10,051 38,04.3 14
Richmond . 3.090 9,953 ?
Total .110.407 357,181 251
Majority against, 246,774,
261 missing out of a total of 2,079.
JOHN .^ROCKEFELLER
DEFEATED BY BROTHER
John I) Rockefeller loot hi* political
fight again?! hn brother William yet
teriiay, when John J. Sinott, Demo?
cratic nominee for Supervisor of Tar
rytown, who wat backed by William,
defeated Seabury C. Maitick. Republi?
can nominee, who wa? supported by
John 1>., by more than 200 vote?.
222M KKT WIVT II VA Al lUSTfUl
I I iiltlliv EArsT t?>?.?VT RI.SOKTS on
S??li',?r I AT Un?? Fl.AMIN',1' I'll
v M Winter Kaajrl Bu.?au. 1114 b dwa>
- A?iL
PENNSYLVANIA LOST
WITH MASSACHUSETTS
IN WOMEN'S FIGHT
Bay State Gives 130,000 Majority
Against Suffrage-?Keystone
Defeat About 150,000.
SEVERAL CITIES IN N. Y.
FAITHFUL TO THE CAUSE
Greater New York Goes Anti by 85.600,
A.anhattan Contributing 32,000 and
Brooklyn /.bout 35,000.
Suffrage was decisively defeated yesterday in New York,
Massachusetts and Pennsylvania.
A majority of approximately 180,000 was rolled up against it
in Nejv York.
Massachusetts, with the Booton returns omitted, reports an
adverse majority of 130,000. Returns from the Hub indicated that
the final result ?-here would be extremely hostile to the amendment.
Early results in Pennsylvania were vague and indefinite, and
it was believed that many rural counties favored the cause. Pitts?
burgh showe?f unexpected suffrage strength. Whether these dis?
tricts could overcome the heavy anti vote in Philadelphia was
for a time in doubt. Suffragists were still hopeful, while their
opponents claimed that they had swept the state by from 125.000
to 150,000.
woraATWiis
GIVE NEW TONE
! TOELEQIONDAI
Voters Impressed by th(
Dignity and Efficiency of
Suffrage Watchers.
By FMMA BUGBEE.
Wom?.n earned her place In N??
York politic-! yesterday. She earned i
becauie she made good at the polls. Ol
th? very day when voter? were denyinj
her the right to b? in politic? ehe wa
there already, and New York was thi
better for it. The presence of flv
thou!??nd dignified, efficient womet
quietly attending to their taska In thi
hubbub of Partie. Day made it? im
presaion upon the thoughtful and th?
thoughtless alike.
From Charles Francia Murphy, wh<
issued order? that Tammany Hall wn
to "treat ladies courteously," down tc
-,'oon loafers there was none who dit
not feel the influence. New York auf
fraeista proved ?ong ago that a "ladj
Il a laiy, even on a soap box." The)
I roved yesterday that she is no lesi
womanly for being in politic!.
It was the d iy to which the suffra?
gists have been looking forward foi
six years. They were awake to greet
it before it dawned, out on the street.'
to perform their last services for the
CM wbile the ?tars were ?till ?hill?
ing. The sun rose on ? city do'ted
with little groups of women, brignt
with yellow sashes, and blue and yel
low posters, patiently waiting outsnie
the polling places, in a last effort to
gain ?ympathy for their cause.
More than one man hurrying to cast
his vote st?.p(,ed aril gr.nned at the
light of the women by the lamppost,
one hundred feet away from the poll!.
To. can't get ahead of tho sutfra
gettes." he chuckled.
There was sqmething pathetic about
these lonely, brave little p.ckets There
were thousands of men who grinned or
passed them by riisdainfuny, but they
stuck to their lamppost*, v.atchlng for
the chance to say a few worda i. a will?
ing ear. They had ?ample ballots to
show any one who was interested how
to mark hi? vote for woman suffrage.
A winter wind, which ha* been on th'
trail of the suffragists ever since the
parade, attacked them again, but did
not succeed in driving them from their
posts.
Inside the polling places the women
had a much pleasanter time Here
good humor prevailed. Tammany wn
on it? honor. Mrs Frederick Giliett?
had the honor of watching in Charlea
F. Murphy's own polling place, a butch?
er,shop at _!)7 First Av? nue.
"I feel like a dOetaale." ?h? ?aid,
gazing at the circle of ?miling, Jovi.l
faces watching her. Tammany may
have thought the women a jok?, but
they didn't fore? the idea. Mrs. Gillette
wa? denied any attention? from Mr.
Murphy himself, for the big bos?, fol?
lowing hi? habit of six year?, tactfully
avoided coming face to face with the
suffragist. He huppened in to vote
just after Mr?. Gillette had gone t?j
lunch. Hi? friend* grinned ?nd ?aid
they didn't know how he had voted on
the sutTrage amendment.
Judge M.chael Blake, however, was
awake to h:a reiponiibility to the
woman He sent in a ?upply of cigars
for th? election clerks, not omitting
chocolate for Mr?. Gillette.
Tammany's courtesy wa? an ?.""dal
thing, too. Whatever the rank and tile
toatlnued ?u peg? I, <ral?a?a I
? Flv?t conntle? alona in New Yorl
r?maln?d faithful to the ?uffrig?
caute. Tompkins, < hatitauqua, Niagara
Broome and Cortland returne I ?mail
majorities favoring the amendment
Westchoster went against the cautt
by 20,000, and practically every other
county, as far as can be judge?! by lat.i
returns, rendered large a-ti majoritie?.
In all It is estimated that 90.000
votes will be the marg.n of th? upstat?
victory.
In Greater New York It Is believed
that 85,600 it a fair ettimate of the
anti majority. Republican ?t?te heud
quarter* believe that tho amendment
.wa* defeated by at least 200.000. In tho
light of th Imperfect re'urr.?, thi?
would seem to be somewhat exagger?
ated.
Of the cities of the ?fate, Ithaca,
Jameatown, Schenectady and Niagara
Falls alone have remained faithful to
the cause, at far a? Incomplete returns
can ?how. Following New York'? lead,
Buffalo, Rochester, Yonker?, Auburn,
Troy, l.'tica and Rome h?ve all rejected
the amendment by substantial ma?
jorities.
As far as can be Judged by th? ?til!
incomplete return?, It would appear
that Manhattan defeated suffrage by
32,000, Brooklyn by 35.000, Qu??n?,
9,000; Bronx, 8,000, and Richmond,
1,100. The up?tate majority will prob?
ably reach 94,000, totalling approxi?
mately 180.O00, a? the answer of th?
electorate to the women'? plea for
votet.
No Charge? of Fraad.
In contradistinction to the New Jer?
sey election there ha* been no scruta?
tion of crooked politic? In New York
election. Nor doe? there ?eem to have
been the illegal use of political ma?
chin?t, and the partnersh p of th? liq?
uor interettt in th? election, which
characterized the teiting of the pro?
poned amendment ?n the ttate acroat
the Hudson. In New York, the itrong
hold of Tammany, whose ??adera are
admittedly oppoaed to ?uffrage, the
women -watchers and picket* were treat?
ed with courte?y and consideration. In
thi? state, at least. It ha? been limply
a case of the electorate not being will?
ing to g've women the vote.
At a la?e hour no statement had been
?ssued by any of th? auffrag? leader?.
The anti?, nowever. w?r? jubilant la
acclaiming their victory.
Mr*. Alice 11:11 < hittenden. president
of the New York State A?sociatlon Op?
posed to Woman Suffrage, ?aid:
"We have defeated them decidedly.
Our organization will now enter Into
the fight again?t the appeal for a Fed?
eral amendment, which, we und erstand,
will be the suffragist?' next mo??."
Mr?. Charle? A. Church, treasurer of
th?- organitation, ?aid that ?he had
learned the vote agatnat the amend?
ment would probably approximate
150,000. "I am not *at-i?fied with thi*,**
she added. "I believe the voten of the
state should have defeated the votes
for women atpeal by at least 200.OO0.'*
Th? earliest return? ptophesled the
defeat of the cau?e Thirteen ?cattered
upstate diitrict?, the first to be heard
from, rendered 1,112 vote? for weotaa
?ulTrage and 1.'' -' agaimt. Rom? aal
th? ?avrlioot municipality to proelaiat a
complete tally. Here again the ?uf?
frage amendment wa? defeated by 1.412
to 1.007. The proportion establlthed la
th??? two instance? roughly. Ihre? to
two In favor of th? anti? wae ?tola?
tained In th? next few report?.
A? th? evening won on th? gas
betw?vn leader and follower narrow??!.