Newspaper Page Text
ZNTexu $otk iCrtbtnu. First to Laut?the Truth: New??Kditorials ?AihertiMements. TIllKsMW s?i\ . MIUK l?. lin.V PI,. Tribun? S , \ . v ? . . a \; rui.i ir??u.i?iii. t; \ - ., | | Tribun. . ? York. Bt-SCOITTION TlAT>-_?B, M I ?i* l'ail. ...it?i1. ? ?. ? ?? V si ' ; . ; ? I .JS . ? i i . i u - roai u.? b?ti - . \. M..A-. - ? l'Ail 1 AM" ? M'AV l?AT_* AM. -? SDAY $'. ?4 ? "I ??ne remt ? ? - * ' Kl M'AV ..M.Y l'ASI.? KM.? -, , tree ta Mb .... .M ?- tt. I ? - >c_r . . C 00 i.M.Y Bl STAY ONL1 .... *.o ar. 4 7.? See \ :Y a? ttSM 1 ' ??? You can purrhase merchandise advertised m TH1 TEIBUNI *A?th absolute safety? for if sHsoatlafactioo result*, in any case THE I lilHlMl guarantee* to pay >our money hack upon request. No red tapi", no quib? bling. \ve make good promptly if the ?d? ert i.ser doe? not. ?Another Year of War. Tlie netting of French arid Hriti-.li war councils in Paris is mor?? than an evident'? ? i new and better co-ordinated military operations, it is ?me more authentic sii.ii of the expectation and purpose of the Franc. and Britir-h to go on with the war to the end. As for the Russians, we have the words of eminent German publicists to base a belief that there is no sign of weak* ening in the Slav state, and in addition there is'- the promis?? in Paris that Rus.-ii and even Italy will join i" this council I?resent?.-.. .or those who cling to the Napoleonic precedent thil new drawing together of the foes of Germany will lecall that agree? ment signed by Um fots of Napoleon on March l>, 1S14, which sealed the doom of the great Emperor and dashed the ?last hopes he had cherished of making a sepa? rate peace with one of his antagonists. In the militery preparations fore shadowed'by the Paris conference there '.? a guarantee of at least another year of war. Within this time the most sanguine believer in .".Hied victory by the strategy of attrition does not expect that German numbers will decrease to the point where, decisive victory will be assured, though many believe that in the late summer their losses will compel the Austro-Germons to shorten their lines in the East and par? haps in the West. The period of open campaigning of the old-fashioned sort stopped in the West in September, l'.?14. It terminated in the East in August of this year. The Aus tro-Italian campaign never passed this point and the Serbian campaign must be regarded as a minor detail, comparable to the Napoleonic venture in Spain, which, after temporary success, proved to ho the ruin of many imperial reputations and the graveyard of unnumbered French con? scripts. As the situation now stands not one ol the great nations engaged has suffered losses buch as would lead it to make peace on terms now obtainable. Franca, the greatest sufferer, would become a rataal of Germany if s-he yielded now. To yield would be to lots the last hope of regainint* Alsace-Lorraine, of cleaving the Germans from the open Belgian frontier, and it would mean the payment of a huge indem? nity and the sacrifice of colon-.'' . For Russia, peace now would mean tho : end of the dream of Constantinople, the surrender of Poland and the Courland. For the Romanoff ?dynasty it would mean the end, for only victory can now stave off an revolution. Economically Rus.-ia would return to German eontrolt and all that the war has meant in industry, as well as In netionaliam and religion, v.uui?. be sacrificed. \? for England. >he has only begun to fight. With a population in England. Scot? land and Wales about tqual to thai of Pru.? sia, ?England ?Soot leos than 400,000 men in the hr.?t year. Pruv-ia more than 1,900,000. At last all Britain and the Empire are awake to the 1.ature of the German peril ?ad to the realization that the best chance they Will ever have to cru?h the moot dan* gcrous rival since Napoleon is in their own hands. In Champagne, in Poland, and now in their drive to the Near East with Egypt as an objective, the Germans have Struck ?MOWS at the existence of three great na? tions. They have lieen so far SOOCeesful that peace now would mean a permam-nt peril to all these nation?. Therefore not one of these nations ?tan Of will think of peace. What is ?still little understood in Amer? ica is that the war is a war for existence foe France and for Great Britain. Ger? many has challenged the right of France to exist, of Great Britain to preserve her world empire. Her statesmen, her writers, her teachers have proclaimed the doctrine that Prance mu.-t be ?rushed. Great Rrit? ain ?limin?t?-?! as a world power, that on the ruin* of the two national structures there might rioc a Teutoi ?c world empire What Germany ha.- been taug! t she has put in practice. A part, a material part. of the great project of Kernhardi has been rwlired Sixteen months of war see G? r meny supreme from the Bere.ina to the Aisne and from the Baltic to the Golden Horn. .** new expedition * already in prep oration for the thrust at Egypt, and Ger man agents are buoy stirring up insurrer I alcutta. A yta.- from now exhaustion without defeat me) lestroy the German ambition. A year Iron, now all the great combatan?., may ?be ready to return to'pea?-?- on a basis that all cun accept. Btlt there is no such basin ?now. Germany eaa not and will not consent ?togive '?pall her mightyeoaqoetti merely for ?peace, t ptace that would bring a staggering an?! sterile debt Germany'.-' foes cannot tgrte ". peace whil?- their v?ry existence j?-. in ?danger. Not until Germany ha:, conquered or ST aorld ambitions fade U felt th? ; ? ? ?pon her own fro.*,".? hostile armies and of want and misery Mithin her boundaries is there hope thnt Germany will consent to return to Europa of August, I9i*i, and not i hey arc coinjuered ran Britain, Fran Ru-'siu atfree to any other conditiot peacr. Napoleon at *h?? ienith of hi**? power ready for peace that left France ?-up in Europe, but ultimately bis wismiss In- lia.l invaded and crushed, a? ninny liai failed to crush her oppon realize?! that only when France ha? turned to her old frontiers and the d <jf woi-I ! empire had been laid in the 1 land ashes (,f defeat could there Ik- a r ', in EurtpC which permitted all natioi ??iijt'.v existen.??'. The war in Kurope must go ou bee the Issu? of the ?rar is not a province principle. In 1871 pss.es wbs possibl? cause German** BOUgfat only a frontier , unity. For the los?- t? France of Al ?and Lorraine Europe cared little, bee ' it did not seemingly destroy the halan? power, Germany. Itaiy und Austria <* make peace in 1866 beeuUM no m ! " i"-.m question was at ?take. To-day i to peace is possible because issus i? the independence of Kurope,am independence not merely of Belgium Serbia, but of France, and the exist? <f the British Empire are imperi by Cern?an .?tipr?'macy at Constantinr and Italian safety is destroyed if Aus remains a German subject-nation, \ Geraten naval power seated on the A ntic at Trieste, (attaro, and to-nior at Valona. The war will tro on because there is ? ?ingle point t?f agreement conceivi between the contestants. The Cien tin am of world empire is still within KaisetV grasp mi any basis of peace t can to-day be proposed. Spain and Fra fought for European supremacy. The?, turn endeavored to reproduce the Hon System and the Roman sway. They fail but until their failure was definitive p manent peace was impossible. German; t<>-day playing the same nile. There ? be no peaes until she, too. abandons it. Nothing is more foolish or more fui to-day than talk or thought of peace, p ticularly among neutrals. There can be peace for men fighting for their lives ur life is assured. There can be no assurai of life for France, Russia or Great Briti until the German dream of world pov ha.? been destroyed. It took Europe t ?/ears to dispose of the Napoleonic ment it ?vill take a shorter time to dispose the German, became it is Napoleon! with Napoleon left out, but the time i peace i.? .?till lar in the future. Fortunately for France and Great Br ain?for the world, a.? The Tribune belie. ?the peril of complete German success h been dirposed of. France, Russia a Great Britain keep the field with growi power end unshaken will. The blood I on Germany has begun to tell; the Briti naval noose has been drawn to suffocatk I German advance has terminated in t Fast end the Went; only in the Balkans there progress still? All doubt of the outcome of the war a? military problem has passed. Such tlou as there might be as to the endurance ai will of the Allies diminishes in the face re-rent evidence, of which the Paris co ference is but one detail. But one, pe haps two years more of war are seeming inescapable, for peace is impossible whi those who rule Germany cling to the belii that it is within their power to organi Europe, dominate the lesser peoples ar build upon the ruins of French, Bri ish ami Russian empires the structure < "Deutschland ?ber Alles." Letting Nature Have Her Way. A surgeon of Chicago has made known that he is resolved to let one c his patienta die. The circumstances ? the ca-e are sufficiently perplexing to a? count for the variety of opinions ta M d upon the wisdom and e.-senti; justice of this decision, but if the BUI geon'l own views on the matter are reall what they are represented to be by the re porters to whom he seems to have talke with such wonderful freedom, and eve eagerness, they suffice in themselves t justify all the misgivings of his severe?** critics. The particular? of the case have no been published. The surgeon seems t have been too much occupied in discus.-ir ethical questions to find time to tell th world what he wag actually confront* with. It is to be frathere<l, however, tha the patient is an infant, and the mail point is that he is destined to ?lie. thougl he might be saved by a surgical opera tion. By what operation we are not told 'ami touching his ailment all we know i that he came into the world with ceitail ?"physical flaws." which, the surgeon sayi ''would undoubtedly make him an invali? during his first year." This alone coub hardly be accepted as a sufficient reasor for letting the boy die, but the surgeor has a more potent reason: he thinks tha if the loy lived he would "probably" ht defective. On the strength of this prob lability he decided, according to the ae counts, to let him ?lie. or. as he puts it, tc let Nature take her course. It is difficult, not knowing the condi? tions, to d?termine exactly what N:iturr 'is drrving at in this interesting case. The surgeon seems to be satisfied that she is prepared to correct what she, no less than he, rectgnizes as it grave blunder. The child eculd be saved, but ?taring it would be interfering with Nature, who would be revenged not on the child alone but pos? sibly on its offspring. "Defectives," he 'says?aor so the reporters make him say "are prolific. It would reproduce its kind, and these initial ?leformities would be magnified and multiplied." Thin is remarkabl,?, because it appears that the mother U a mult?para with three "line heal'hy children." and that there II nothing at all to indicate a fumily taint on her side or the fatherV. [Jpg* v.hat rea OU lie ?oncltides that the "phys? ical flaw?" would be multiplied in fnt?ro gsnerationi bt does not ?ay, but, that por I haps may be allowed to pass as a minor (consideration, the principal one being the probability of inferiority in the child it>elf. Apart from ell iptcumtions on the heritability of the flaws, it will occur to some critics to a-k whether the surgeon is right in assuming that he is gntwaraUt only to his own con.-cience, inasmuch as the ca.ie was "given him to decide."' It is very true that we cannot be sun how ?Strong the reasons are for his decision, but according to the reports h< :s .-?ting on a probability. 1 ' I very safe course? Certain forms ??f men? tal deficiency which seen.e.l hop? les- some years ago are enormously Improved to-day when treated with thyroid gland; there is now reason to believe that others may in some measure be benefited by neo-tal? Varean. These probably have no relation whatever to the particular case under con? sideration, but they justify a doubt as to the saffty of suffering ?lectors to decide whether to let men live or die by what they conceive to be probabilities. Some of them might be well guided, but !?. allow them so much liberty is to extend their function in a dangerous measure. ?Docton M yet are neither gods nor executioners. Museological Ptomaines. It is rather unfortunate that sand? wiches and the Mustttn of Natural His? tory should be linked, though momenta? rily, in the public ni.'nd, since New York ers, raised on the Raines law, are only to., familiar ?with a species of sandwich whose only proper habitat would be th^ Museum of Natural History. The horrid thought that such might finally have found lodgement there will give them all the more anxiety for the wtllbting of Commi-.ioner and Mr-, Kingsbury and Dr. Wile, and will ?excite, too. their pro? found sympathy in the indisposition of these distinguished fellow townspeople. But there may be some comfort in re? membering that every day sees fresh demonstrations of the power of sugges? tion. No one can deny that sandwiches eaten at the museum are eaten in an un? pleasantly suggestive environment. Could this circumstance alone have caused the illness of the Kingsbtiry?; and Dr. Wile? It will be Impotsibie to say with any cer? tainty, of course, until Dr. Haven Emer? son, the Commissioner of Health, has com? pleted his analysis of one of the unhappy sandwiches served at the .Monday even? ing meeting. But if suggestion is actually the culprit we may look for a .-peedy re? covery of tho three invalids. And in the mean time we may s?.ln<*e ourselves with Dr. Henry Fairfiehl Os born's argument against a more serious cause: "Many of the best known scien? tific men in the country were at the meet? ing, and none of them was ill in the morn? ing." Scientists, as every one knows, are suggestion proof. If their stomachs had rebelled we might well have been alarmed. Liberties of the Picture Dealer. A well known London firm of picture dealers, who at one time hail a branch in this city, endeavored lately to recover damages of a dealer in Bath for alleged talse and fraudulent representations in the sale of certain sketches attributed to Con? stable. The particulars need not at present be considered; suffice it that the purchasers of the sketches depended mainly for their claim upon the following letter written by the defendant when a-ked to give the pedigree of his supposed Con? stables : l purchased them about five or six month* ago from an old la.iy shortly before he death. She told me that, ?the sketches be? longed to her father, who ?ras an srtist'l model, an?! he got them from "Constable." I purchased from hi r ah..is* seventy B? eighty, in fact everything in picture line she had. Some more I am leading OR f you. The old lady's Dams aros "<??,if?ini"; her husband was an Italian or ?some for? eigner. The name of her father, "the artist's model," I forpot to as'-; -.bout. The buyers found that on the margins o," several were the word- ".I. Constable. R. A." or "J. Constable fecit," but after? ward learne?! that in reality they were ?lone ?by one Warren, and ?having reason to believe that the story about the ol?l lady ?ailed Golfani was a pare invention, they proceeded to sue the dealer of Rath. At the trial the defendant admitted that he had been told the .?ketches were Warren's, but that, he said, might mean that they ?samt from Warren's collection. As to Mrs. Golfani, he confessed that she was an imaginary person, but he was obliged to invent her, "knowing how dealers in Lon? don tried to find out the source of such things." As to the signatures, it was true that he had inscribed them himself, but the skttchte had been offered to him as "very clever things," anil seeing he himself thought they were Constable's, the mere writing of the name arts no violation of his conviction. The interesting upshot tras that the jury disagreed. Apparently the confession of lying was not regarded by all a impres? sive. Does this mean that the old princi? ple of rnrcnt nnptor is unlimited in its application, or that there is something in the very nature of picture dealing that justifies a free cxen i.?e of the imagina? tion? John Demenjoz, th. aviator, who hailed Mi.?.? Liberty while up?*i?ie down in the air, .njo;.e?l an aspect entirely in keeping wi'h the times. e No lli'prlaal? on Klo h?n ? Mr? r ? ? Net so long a* the legislative pantry con tiaaea to satisfy. The Allies will riot have TurVey for Thanksgiving, this sear. Liberia's Neutrality Violated. ,i rom "" ?'...si.'.i?'.i BffaSNaaa I Alleged violations of I.ib.rian *,?? ,' hv Genatay, especially *hr..ugh its wir-les* telegraph systOSB, "r>' Mid to he ?aaaoyiag France. Protests to the Halted States, which is regarded an Liberia's patron, may result. The 1'rnted Sta'.-?. could, of <.o.i?e, make representations to l.iheiia <>r le'iniany, or both, in the matter, bot .American j>:?tron-| ege "f the little African repohlic ii sot -.f the war ?aoaaibility sort. -he capitsil of I I? beria is Monrovia, in honor of the AaMRCOO President, but the Monroe Doctrine apiilies to this continent only. i REMEMBER THE LUSITANIA" Comment of Reader of a Recent Tribune Editorial. I To the I. i'.tor of The 1 riburr. Sir: To the gentleman who wrote the re? cent editorials on the British mistake snd the rem? mbrance of the Lusitania. will you please convey my sincere appreciation? Than the last one. no article has stirred ray blood more since the days of the Civil War, because manifestly it came from a heart, wrung with the sense of utter helplessness in the hour ??.hen ?'ir country, blindfolded, I sadly fear. | lu-r way among the hot piough ghams. <>f course we are not the people North or ?-until who fought the war to a finish. De? ll i??. ?lie circumstance that we ?aere all or us. earlier or later, imported, we were sub ? . >.ll\ ,1 homogeneous people. We are so BO longer, and I greatly fear that ease, com 'ort, ?urces?! have so developed the pocket ? ? that it 13 really the only one that is responsive. It BBsBBSI me to nee one new-paper after , another Ott those I have been accustomed to . read joining in a war dance over the protect to England and the necessity of tnforcing it. ? an not the author of these two articles give us one which may help to open the eyes of those of us who are riding for a sure fall" They Beam to think that it's enough to say, "Ok, England Brill never go to war with us'" Which may be true enough; but why need she? Alieady one sees suggestions in the daily pr? s* as to ?.chat might be the situation if we were left to maintain the Monroe Doc? trine without a friend in the world. New York. NaT, It, Iflf, READER. Americanism First. To the Editor of The Tribune. Siri ht a t?a.h reader of The Tribune ytj'ir editorials on the pusillunimous attitude ; of the Washington government | President Wilson i as to the murdering of Americun eitissng on the high seas console me a little for being an American whose paternal ances? tor landed on '.hesj shores prior to 1?', l?. Where are the statesmen, if we have any, placing themselves on record as to whether this Is a nation, with a position among the i powers of the world, or simply a dumping 'ground for the countries of the world, or for those who come hero to get what there is here, but still retain their love and alleg? iance to th?* land from which they have fled for the purpose o! enjoying liberty and im? proving their material condition? Colonel Roosevelt seems to be the only Presidential politician i pardon the word pol? itician, but it expresses my thought) who ha?1 strongly expressed himself on the murdeiing : highwayman, the (?erman government; and I an el the opinion that this is a good timt for the several Republican aspirants for the no ruination for the Presidency to place them? selves on record as to their Americanism, unhyphenated. HENRY C. WEEKS. Mamaroncck, N. Y., Nov. 15, IMS. Mr. Wilson's Accomplishment. To the Editor of The Tribune. Sir: "The New Yori: Worlil" in an edi? torial in its issue of the ISth instant bus the following: "All that has been gained in the way of subjecting German submarine warfare to th?* rules of international law has been fi....- ? ?: by President Wilson, but American diplomacy cannot undertake to do ths work of the British navy," and as a heading to the above asks this question: "Hut What Is the British Navy Doing?" Will "The World" kindly tell us what the ?'.??m?an navy is doing? What has it done, and what does it propose doing, Bnd what has President Wilson done to subject Ger? man submarir.o warfare to the rules of in? ternational lav,'.' For answer I would ask "The New York World" to carefully read the excellent editorial in The Tribune of the 11th instant under the head "A Second Lusi? tania." "Amencnn diplomacy" as r?J)resenteti b;, President Wilson "cannot undertake to do the work" of its own navy, far less inter? fering with that of the most powerful navy : the world has ever seen. MRS. JOHN B. CAMPBELL. New York, Nov. 13, 1915. Our Rights as Americans. To the Editor of Tho Tribune. Sir: I read with much pleasure your edi? torial of to-day. "Pitiless Publicity." It was B message that must strike a note of patriot? ism in a heart truly American, but perhaps dulled rind stagnant, due to the "new patriot i m" established by the present administra? tion. A man's sense of duty between right and srrOBg may be prompted by any of many motives, my idea being that we should un? hold at any cost the honor of our country and our rights as Americans, fought for and given to us by our forefathers, and to be Milling at all times to tight for, if needs bo, the cause of justice and righteousness. JOHN R. BOWMAN, Jr. Putnam, Conn., Nov. 15, 1915. i _ Forgotten Ideals. | To the Editor of The Tribune. Sir: Pieuse allow me to thank you most eoHially for your magnificent editorial on the new patriotism '"Remember the Lual t h? in" as copied in to-day's "Boston Tran? script." lint* can only hope that its meaning, carriel by the biting and burning words in which you clothe it, may niter into the placid brains it: Washington before we have fallen much fur '.ri r in tho world's esteem. What becomes of Wilson's loudly trampetrd idealism that brought him the votes of maty |.! men, in view of his perpetual disregard of it in hts political actions ? L. ?". PARKER. Auburt dale, Ma?s., Nov. 15, 191,",. Reprint Them! To the Editor of The Tribune. Sir: May I congratulate you on your spien IM editorials entitled "Remember the Lusitania" and "Pitiless Publicity." I should be glad if, as was suggested, they could be published in pamphlet form. I want to send several copie- to my friends abroad, who are ( beginning to think the United States too ;n dirTerer.t or too weak to protect the lives of it? dtissaa. M. e. decourbey. Bryn Mawr. Penn.. Nov. 15, 1915. Appreciated. To the Editor of The Tribune. vr: Your editorial in this morning's Trib BBS :? the strongest one that I have reud in H-.ii-d to our duty in the matter of protee t "ii to our own people, averting *f_ture dan? ger, maintaining our national ideals and fur? ther doing the things that we owe to the world and civilization. I am bankful for yon courage in coming out ho plainly. WILLIAM 0. BUTTON. Philadelphia, Nov. 15, 1915. The New Patriotism. To the Editor of The Tribune. Sir: Appreciation is expressed for your new patriotism editorial ["Remember the ! BSitaala**] reprinted in "The Boston Evening Transcript" of >ostcrdi?y. A friend tells Be he mailed a copy to London today, so I am not slone. LINCOL?N RI?HTER. Besten, Nov. 16, hmb. ASSISTANCE. NOTE TO FOLLOW NOTE Lusitania Precedent in Our Contro versy with England. To the Editor of The Tribune. Sir: Germans must have a keen sense o humor, despite reports to the contrary. Th lcomments of the German press on Presiden Wilbon's note to England show- real humoi 1 They express some doubt that our letter I v. ritir.g President will follow words wit! _ction if the necessity should arise. How ridiculous! Of cour, o ?ProsldeOt Wil son will follow his words with action, but th action will consist of reaching for anothe sh-af of paper and penning another liter;?n masterpiece to England. He may even tel England that the seizure of another Ameri can ship will be considered a distinctly dis courteous act. If President Wilson had followed his ?.vor?! to Germany with real action the Ancona out : rage would not have occurred. Reparatioi ? for the Lusitania victims, whose bodies an scattered over the sands of the oce;in, wouli have been made. There would not have beei any attack made on the Arnbic, but then thi President would not have gained a diploman? , "triumph!" If President Wilson had followed word! with action -the kind of action that Theo dore Roosevelt would have taken ha?l he beer at the helm of the country- Americans woul? rot be despised in Mexico. Americans woul. !not have been forced to stand impotently bj while filthy bands of Mexican outlaws out? raged their women. American sailors urn soldiers would not have been slaughtered bj outlaw bands. In tho face of the action that has been 'taken with Germany and Mexico does an> ?sane man really believe for one instant that i England will heed the latest note'.' Downing Street will probably answer it, but the an? swers will probably be about as elaeldat?B| as the German notes on the Lusitania case were. Democratic newspapers must have a won? derful sense of humor when they comment on the "triumphs" of the administration's for? eign policy how President Wilson has kept us out at war. People have n different name for the man who allows every person to rule roughshod over him and ?lni>? not retaliate. ?That is just what the Halted States has been ' doing. May the good Lord deliver us from another Wilson, v.ho appears to be actuated in every - thing he does from the political point of view. liive to us another Roosevelt. Be nade hi.s mistakes, but any man who does things makes mistake*. Roosevelt's own pet term, "mollycoddle," tits the man who does nothing but trim his sails for the political wind?. Of course, the Chicago beef barons haven't anything to do with t^ie note to England. It was directed solely by the master mind of President Woodrow Wilson. Now if he could ! only semi Pociist Hill Rryan along v. i'h 1 it what a load of junk we would get rid of at one time! But then, it is brutal to wish any? thing like the perpetual Presidential can.lt liate on the English. Why not send him to ? he Kaiser to revenge the Lusitania's dead? E.ekiel and his trumpet might go along, too. New York. Nov. t'J, lilt, p. p. Possible Price of Peace. , To the Editor of The Tribune. Sir: We are now haviag a recurrence of the epidemic of secretly instigated l.v.vl???? ness which swept the country a few months ago; we are also, la the .sinking of the An? cona, face to face with another Lusitania crisis. Where will it all end? When will it all end? Cnder the guise of h ??riet neutrality we have watched and waited in ignominious su pineness. while within our borders have been brazenly perpetrated the most flagrant and insolent violations of our ?latu.? as an im? partial non-combatant. We have protested, yes; we shall probably continue to protest. Of what avail are protests in a situation such n? -mu eonfroata w?, such ?s bus confronted si- iaily growing worse laatSOd "f better since the outbreak of the European war? The time for "strict accountability" notes Is past; so 1a the time for toleration of inter* fBisaos with and destruction of our legiti? mate industries; of being content with techni? cal evasions of the questions at issue, or of Is studied ignoring of our official communica? tions concerning them; of accepting without emphatic resentment the inexcusable out? rages being daily visited upon us; of playing politics with preparedness. Are we cowards? At?- ITS "too proud to tight"? What ails us, anyway? The pacificist's slogan is "Peace at any ' price!" God forbid. To plunge this country into war would, indeed, be B calamity. To itind ourselves suddenly but not without due I warning, if we would but heed that wl:tch lg going on around us -rent, by internal dis BldsiB and. at the same time, attacked from j without, would be an infinitely greater ca? lamity. And that is precisely Srhat we BIS -I", ?line toward; is what will happen to in unless events take a decided turn for the bet? ter; which isn't at all likely. Prating vainly of a great diplomatic tri? umph, trusting implicity in the efficacy of the i doctrine of the higher humanity, il almo?'. ?ludicrously childish. With men's passions in ! flamed as they are throughout practically the I entire world to-day; with strife, pillage, : rapine, treachery and universal chaos ram? pant, what right hrive we to expect, to hope j i ven, that a soft word will turn away the vrath of warring mankind, or scholarly phrases stem the tide of a world crisis? If this be jingoism, then is the writer a jingo. But it isn't jingoism- -as this coun? try ??' destined to learn at no remote!v dis? tant day. HOMER DUNNE. Yonkers, N. V.. Nov. 11. 1915. Depopulated Poland. I To the Editor of The Tribune. Sir: One statement made by your Petro? grad correspondent, M. Tcheikesoff, in his ?article in The Tribune of November !? calls 'for a correction without which it would be 'misleading. He ?ays: "Of the 14.H00.000 in? habitants of the provinces occupied by the ; Germans. ?',,000,000 have fled before the ad? vance of the modern Huns." I do not wish ?to dispute his figures, the accuracy of which I neither he nor any one else is in a position ?to judge, except, perhaps, a few Russian and ?German officials who do not usually vouch? safe information of any kind to the public. {?That M. TeheikesofT should have said is tha?. | these ??,000,000 people fled, not before the ad I vanee of the modern Huns, but before the retreat of the Cossacks. It is now fairly welL known that the Russians laid waste the I '.?.lio!?? country behind them as they retired,! burning cities, towns, villages and farms andl even compelling the wretched peasants to| burn their crops and pasture to prevent their' u?" by the German troops. Statements to' this effect have appeared in The Tribune and ?other American newspapers, as well as in the English and German press, and may be ac? cepted as accurate, for they are in full ac? cord with well known Russian military methods. It is conceivable that such vast numbers have fled into the interior of Rus-' sia, but they were escaping not from the Huns, but from a desert. When cities of the size of Brest-Litovsk, with a population of: .'ill.inn), are burned to the la.st stick, it is' ?vident that the inhabitants must fly el-?-' where, and it is equally evident that they would not be permitted to go in the direc? tion of the German lines. Of the 8,000,000 who, as M. TeheikesofT tacitly admits, remained behind in the con? quered provinces the great majority belong to the purely Polish and Jewish elements, and ha?*e welcomed the Huns with open arm?, regarding them as deliverers. In these warlike times it is almost im? possible to hear unbiassed opinions on any subject connected with the great . onflict, even from those who, one would think, should be truly neutral. But it makes one smile to hear a Cossack talking ot "the Huns." EDGAR DE HOND. Perch Lake. N. Y., Nov. 11, 1915. A Question of Values. To ?he Editor of The Tribune. Sir: Would you please tell me through your paper why an American life is so valu Bbls SB a British ship and so worthies* on American soil viz., along the Mexican j border? "COK." Grahamsville, N. Y., Nov. ?, 1915. I I INJUSTICE TO WEST POINTER: Its Graduates Handicapped in Gain ing Entrance to the Army. To the Editor of The Tribune. Sir: In regard to the shortage of offlctr that will exist in our army ir. time of w? and the function which Wet Petal I I the regular service, there ?ire several point that do not seem to have had e? i lid? ration First, reconls ?rill show that seldom, il ?-'.(i ! lu*e the e.'iilet corps been op to th? nv...mun i providud lor by law. This i? due to tjri [ceases. The time of examination? 1- ??? fixed that if a candidate from a gives dis trict fails in his entrance examinations th? vacancy which he was to fill must rem.il open for an entire year. Again, the ls*r: are ?ucr as to d?courage Sty man vvh? i wishes to enter the military piefeeaiee fron doing so through the | th? aci.der.-.y Vacancies in the officered ranks of thl army are filled tirst from the gr-?.iustin| elaee ut West Point; second, from the n listed men of the army; thud, from c?r*?'i military schools selected by the War D? pert-Beat, and, laaily, from siviltss l if' Now, notice the ?lifTerer.ce in requirement? The law says la effect te the West Pointer: "You are being sent te the beet militar? I school in the world. You will have UM be?! I system of instruction tin?; can be d-\ised; sill your education will ?be ?along militar) ! In.? s and will have for its object tS gradu?t? ? you as nearly a perfect oflcor a? it il pos i sibls to produce. But, in spite of ail thi-, lour leleas do not consider that you i I lit to wear shoulder straps Bad take your 1 place among the other otlicers ef the army I until your full four years are up." To the enlisted man, however, the state? ment is different. Although it is conceded .that the education at West. Point is probably the best military education to he obtained in the world, it is by law dtclarcl so *B> BO fcrior to that obtained in the enlisted ranks of the army that, while four yean BIS *?? .quired at West Point, only two are I** I I in the ranks in order to gain a commission. An illustration taken from my own ex? perience will show how- this works eut. I took the entrance examinations aitl a UBS whom I will designate as A. I BOSSOd and A ?failed. I put in my four years and after a year's service met A, also an oftVer, at a man?uvre cs.mp. He hid been ?"omti.vion*. from the ranks two yeun before i ?rai com? missioned from West Point, u'.d. n- we we*e both in the name branch of the service, be naked me just those two years. The case of men commissioned from mill* taiy schools la not so flagrant, but is never th?le.?s also unjust to West Pointers But the co-Moissieetag of ci\?linns who h-*e never had any Military training, but who have political pull, is criminal. The answer is naturally to abolish Welt Point instead of enlarging it, as you have advocated. It costs the people of the I'mted States millions of dollars, ar.d t.?k<-.? a great numb.-r of officers away from their regiments for administration and educational pu if Ceagrees feels, as it svidcntlj .loe?, that two yi-ars la the rooks, or four yeors i" v run-for-pio:'.! military BChOOl, er the evr Bise ef their own ju?lgment civ .! iaae from their own constituents a'.l BfO" duce officers equal to and therefore entitled to rank with the grodoot? s ef Stott P? '? u''>' maintain West Point at all? It i ob a useless expenditure of money at a time when government receipts are already f*r behind the expenditure-. In view of such discrimination it is not to be w-or.dere.l at t! ,v We?' P...r.t ? ? SOt ?n attractive proposition to a man who .! I ' a military career; and I \entutc to >a> that wire the capacity of the Military Academ?' doubled the proportion of vacancies would be VOey much greater than it Is now. Per? sonally. I am absolutely loyal to West Point, and deeply appreciative of the spirit of f*?ir ..' laetlee and of the high sense "f honor which is* inculcated m its graduate?. Without conceit, I believe our cotnmercisl standards would be higher and our country better if hundreds? of thou.-aini? of men *?itl? West Point ideale were injected into our civilian life. Rut my advice, under present conditions, to any man who wishes to ?elect the military a. his life prufes.ion would be wiiliou*. ?,u?.?tlon te let West Point ?ion? uiiil enter Irte BOBSSSlseloaed rank? of 'b* army tluougli OM Of the other avenues. J. B. W. GARDINER. New York, Nov. 13, 1915.