Newspaper Page Text
i\>ta3)0rk ?ribunr. Fir?t to Lait? the Troth: Ne??? Kditonals ?Advertisements. ??\rt KI?\Y. IIECEMHKK II. IBIS. ? ana puM_h?1 Jt_;v ggi T?> Trlt-ui.? A?. . ? N?. Tort corporal , ? M H.11 l'rta' >' ? I arre. ?Kvrrury gg- | Tra-aa?irar * Virria, Trll-un? 1 . N : I \ ggagg ii-.rwt N,w fork n Ksrtiipnns lukTT.t -hr M??.:, ??.?.??g? l_ * '.r.?t.f S.w York ]??' t a Sur.la?. 1 trio I " ptlly gab 1 month I M i.ar . "... i-a- , m taur.?iay. I goo I : Dglljr on!? 1 mor.! J'?.' . A s mAey. ? nxaa 4 . . -, nor.l '? ? la?. '. arar I ! Hal .1 ?r?. ! ." Kun.l?, tin'.). 5 ).a V??Hr!(.N BATO I l AN M>IAN 11A1I I'AILY _-l- r- SLAT ' LAll.Y AM) Hl'NDAI IB I! ?? ? -'. Ot.. >??? .... M'SPAT ,,?.-?, I.AII.Y l.?-a/a One yter ... aj so .,... ,,.4r DAIt.T ?.?.TI BUN-AY "NI-. ' ? ' ! . - Ot.? ?<?_? II :-.. .i?.h t.ar 4 ? EntarKl at ?_g roe't-Or? a;. Nr? Tot? ?? B?-a-or.i1 l',?a Mgli Ml'.* Voa can porch??* merchandise advert?????! In THK TR1BCNK arlth absolute safety?for If di??atl?faction results in any case Till: TRIBUNS guarantees to pay >our monea back upon request. No red tape, n<? ?juih bling. We make food promptly if the ?li? iert i ser does not. Do They Want Roosevelt? Do the Republican leaders in Washing? ton desire to mako Theodore Roosevelt the Republican candidato for President in 19161 Do they desire to see Mr. ; velt nominated and elected'.' Colonel Roosevelt's weaknesses are bet tar known than those of any other Ameri- : tan. The years since he left the White HoUM have been years which bave sub- , tracted from rather than added to his .??tature as a public man. There have been times in the past three yeara when his fellow-countrymen have been almost con? vinced that his usefulness was at an end. But in the last few months there has 1 mo no mistaking the fact that there has baaa a ieal change in public opinion, and i .on who were long and steadfastly op 1 id to Mr. Roosevelt as President and . candidate are daily confessing to ange t>f opinion and feeling. The reason is simple, and it is explained 1 y an a'tmost uniform statement. Thou saads and thousands of Americans be? lieve that if Theodore Roosevelt had been Pr?sidant of the United States there would ?aat* been no Lusitania tragedy. Tho?e ?i., hold that the tragedy was inevitable I that without war and without peril .r Mr. Roosevelt would have obtained from Germany a disavowal and a guaran tt-i* against a repetition of the crime. There is one point on which Mr. Roose ?'- strength has never been questioned. ? ?a a patriotic, loyal, aggressive Ameri? can, He has from the beginning of his lite stood consistently and sturdily for an \ ? ncanism which is the natural out frowUl of the Americanism of 177."> and 1861. At a'.l times, under all circum ????, without hesitation and without qualification. Colonel Roosevelt has cham? pioned, fought for, served, an ideal of na? tional honor which came down to him from other generations of Americans. In the present crisis in American his t'.n ; . when arc are involved in a dispute wiih Germany because Germany has mur? dered American citizens, when we are fac? ing a situation of anarchy and domestic sti ife at home, Colonel Roosevelt is the one American who has, without hesitation and without thought of the political effet-- of Ma words, spoken frankly. Other public men have cavilled ami crawled. They have not dared to say thr invasion of Belgium was a crime, even th..ugh not a crime calling for political intervention on the part of the United State?, because such a declaration would it pel German-American votes. They have not dared to assert that all that America l for in history and tradition was at stake on the European battlefield, and that our cause was the cause of France and of Great Britain. But Colonel Roosevelt has .?aid it?is saying it. Other men in pubiic life and office have mistaken the condition tif neutrality for that of neuter, and the mi-take flows from political anxieties an?. ern for hyphenate votes. Now, if the Republican leaders in Wash? ington believe that they can imitate Mr. n, preserve a discreet silence upon the things that are uppermost in the minds and hearts of most Americans, keep the votes of the Americans without repulsing those of the German-Americans, invite to UM Republican party the votes of those (f rman-Americans who are angry at Mr. Wilson for the little he has done to pre? serve American self-respect, while enlist inic the ?upport of those who resent his r?.jr?e a? cowardly, they are making a grave and a fatal mistake. The issue of the next campaign will not I*- the tariff. It will not even be prepared naas. It most assuredly will not lie Mr. Wilson's Mexican policy. The lusue of the n.-xt election will be the preservation of American honor abroad and American ex istence at horn?*. The ??nue cann?*t be dofjge-d, it cannot lie escaped, it cannot Ix* forgotten by mutual concent. Millions of American citizen- in the laut Mv and months have awakened to the n-aliza tion of the new conditions and perils that fun ?he com?try. They are at la-t ap j.r?-riating the __MM and humiliation of a foreign poiky based upon ?lomeMic j??,!iti cal oontideratioriB. They are perceiving ? the extent of pusillanimity among tl politicians and of C4?ward)cc among tl leaders. In this aituation there is one man \ has neither con proa lised BO? quali? There is one man who hits froflMhe \ outset expressed hi- conviction?, h? liofs, hi-, faiti;, and that man il Th?" i Roosevelt. He has not stopped t<> OOBSl whether he could pet the German-Ami can votes if he did not characterize Belgian infamy. He has not reduced districts and Congressmen the ooot of fending American lives and honor. has told the truth that was in him. If the Republican leaders in the capi and the nation to-day are not willing face the situation that exists; if they not dare to put their party squarely reword on questions which affect r.atioi honor and national security; if they 1 come silent partners in the conspiracy national betrayal at Washington, bclievi that they will thus get the vote? of t hyphenate.? while keeping those of pat utic American.?, they will wake soi months bence to find that they have r livercu* themselves bound hand and fc to Theodor* Roosevelt, and that they ha permitted him to become the siagic ti?<u in American public life {??ratified with poii'-y ut courage and patriotism whi will apjieal to tl c American people in t next campaign. If the Republican leaders at Washing?*! desire this thing to happen, there is not ing they need do now that they have n been doing for months. Their present pc icy is all that is required to make the nom nation and election of Colonel Roosevelt ii evitable. As the situation now stand Colonel Roosevelt is the only man who ca defeat Mr. Wilson, because he is the onl man who has offered an honest substitu? fur Mr. Wilson's policy in the vital que: tioa of American honor abroad and secui ity at home. If the Republican leader cannot see this, they are blinder now tha they were in 1912, and they will present? pay for their blindness in a? complete fashion. Two generations f.go a political party i; this country strove to face both ways on ; question of principle involving nationa safety and honor. As a consequence it per 'shed. The Republican party can no mor survive half American and half Hyphe than could the Whig when it became bal slave, half free. If the Republican leader attempt to follow roch a course one of tw things will happen either the party wil be destroyed altogether or it will becom the instrument for the election of Mr reit Panama Bonds and the Pay-as-You Go Policy. Th? pay-as-you-go argument made bj Presidoat Wilson in hi- Pireparodnoa .ige contains a glaring nav-xequitnr The President ia anxiou . apparently, t< make the taxpayer.-- of the country fee the full weicht of the cost of militar*, preparation, trusting to find in a reluct anee to pay BOBM justification for his OWI atternpts to limit the MODS of preparation He therefore opposes either the authori zation of new bun la I" meet the cost ol real military reorganisation or the sale o1 bonds already authorised for the purpose of repaying the Treasury the monej which it haa advanced out of the Genera' Fund for Panama ? anal construction To excuse thi? refusal to coiiecf a deb? owed t?. the Treasury, and through it t? the present generation of taxpayers, Mr Wilson made thi1? iffgnme Borrowing money is *?hort-*if;h'c,l finance It can b.* justified only n hen permanent thine* are te bS seeonpliahed, which man) ?StiOBB will certainly benefit bj an?: which it is hardly fair that a finf-le f-enera tion should pay for. The ohiec^? we an mo* proposinK to spend money for cannot In? ?c elaasifled, except in the nenie ?hat everything | ?lore may tic sai.l t?. be done m th? interest of pus-ten*;, ai well a*, la our own. This line of reasoning absolutely defeats itself. Whatever may be thought of mili? tary preparation at thi- time as an in vestment for the benefit of future genera? tions, no one cat, ?ieny that the Panama (anal is such an mvestmant Congres? never intended that the taxpayers of a single decade should pay the greater part of the cost of the Panama waterway. The canal act provided for th?* i?sue of bonOS to the amount of $.'?70.000,000. Proceed? from the ?ale of b) ndl BO far have amount?-?! to $134^1^80, and there || still due te the Tr?'a-ury for cash advances |221,581|719. M?.i-ei'v?'r, the Treasury hns ? on the canal |8O,O0Oj0O0 not rcim liursable from bond issues, and if the ad? ministration haa its way %ZbfiOOfiO0 more, not reimbur.-able !'i?>m bond sales, will he {.aid to the Republic of Colombia in satis ii of claims arising out of the ac ?lui-ition f?f the Canal /.one. It would be a gros?: injustice to leave the ..i-' -urn of $251,000,000, possibly $t76f iioo.oiKi, -addled on the present generation, .vhil?' presenting to -iic<-ee?lirig generations a c.-mal with a I".tided d?lit of only |1S5?? 000,000, abli- to pay it? way and. with proper management, to return ?iperating ?lividends. Th?. prinriple which Mr. Wilson ote?, of balancing the obligation! O? the genera? tion1? Which BISJ to BOMfit from a pernia public work applies fully tO the canal debt Th?- Tiea-ury .?h'-uld be rt-imbur-i-tl through hottd sales up t?. ?.'i7?.000,000 the amount fixed by < ongre*.s. That sum ? ;??? Ml ?? part of the surplus taxation ?if the hsat asacada, it Is sash pot Balds and It may be legitimately employ.'d now bj the government'to meet expenditures for military preparedness. If we spend it ! we should not be borrowing from the fut? ure. We sh..uld be applying strictly "he pay-as-you-go programme which Mr. W il : f.. --. ai 1 this generation would be .. ed thereby to avoid a*i unfair double taxation first f"t* the canal an?! then for ;. letter army an?! navy. What the Pr?sidant sai?! doaa not i refusal to Indemnify the Treasun foi ? anal advances. On the contrary, it makes such an indemnification a matter botk of equity and expediency. A Tax on Tabby. A ration it?rer luMtwa the full extent of its resources until pushed by necessity '' to turn everything to account. Germany* is finding a way to make wood both edible and palatable, to judge from some of the i illuminating advertisements appearing in her new.-paper.-, .-?? that while the Black ? lasts he can never g? hungry. Great Britain ha? not yet been reduced to this rabattait*? for shi-addad wheat, but a recent proposal in the House of Commons shows UM Meeasit* -C il rapidly ap? proaching of converting the luxur . peace into the smews of ?rar. Briefly, Captain Charle- Bathbury would have Par? liament impose a tax of fl on ?ach cat in .?m . ? of one maintained by any given household, failure to pay the tax lea-ling to the confiscation of pussy and Itl conver? sion into sealskin, or Persian lamb or ?r mine, for the lining of Tommy*! winter overcoat Though cal lovers trill stand aghast ?it this latest threatened horro: of war. it mu.st be confessed that the suggestion has it? merits. People who support cats should be made to demonstrate in some robstaa? tial form the affection they profs them or forever h'.bl their peace. If their protestations possess only a small per? centage of sinceiity. Great Britain, i Parliament thinks kindly of Captain Bath bury's proposal, should reap a small liar ?rest in taxes. Ami then there are so many homeless tal.hies and torn?? which might better be fighting for their country in the trenches than along the back fence! j of London that Mr. Atkin? cannot fail tc l.enefit from the measure, tOO. If only he might be endowed als?, wit? the nine lives which should go with eacl skin! Drinks by the Card. Nothing could be neater than the ??heme of tiie National Defence Association for promoting temperance by law. If the coming Legislature accepts the plan, any person of either se\ desirous of imbibing vinous, malt or spirituous liojuors must ob? tain a license, price, $1; family 1. covering a year. $5. Kuch person, in or e'ering a drink, must present the card; no, person may get a drink on another's curd. and it will be a jail offence to obtain a ??rink on a borrowed license, Any bar* tender selling drinks without seeing the card will be rabjected to extreme jen alty; both buyer and seller are to go to jail if a drink is obtained by any p lacking a card. N'.. drink mu.-t be -?>l?i to ;?i.y person Ihowfhg signs of intoxication. Any person arrested for drunkenne ?? or ttcated by a physician for that condition twice within a year will ha\>' his license revoked; if a third time-defying all the borrandoUS penalties ho manage- t.. get drunk, he is to be prohibited from drinking thenceforth forever. Ami. to make up tu the saloons for the lack of revenue which will result, they are to be exempted fron paying license fees. Undoubtedly nothing more than thil could he wished to reduce the state t.. s condit?on of abject and thoroughgoing, temperance it the population of the stall v.ere as used to legal restriction- ai i Bl '.??'inpletely under the command of the drill sergeant as Prussia. But this is America, the land of Individuality, of enterpri-o and, alas! of contempt of law. Even Main?,? and Kansas Tiavo found that prohibition doesn't prohibit, Where there'. a *r,]] to drink there's usually a way. N?. moderate drinker would be helped under the scheme, ??nd no sot could be prevented from bag ging, borrowing, buying in quantity before ? -?itication set in or stealing en?.ugh fire water to satisfy hi highest ambitions in the way t.f intoxication. Aside from the tad that the plan wouldn't work if the Legislatura made it law. and the further fact that no Legislature of tin- -tat?' could be expected to make it law if it would work, it is highly to be commended. Berlin- Shares Turkey's Guilt. To the Kditor ?>f The Tribune. Sir: (leurre Maraulay Tre\el'.aii, the au? thor of that waaaerfal pro??? epic i?n the career of Garibaldi and the author gho of other brilliant book?, i? well known In this country to a large circle of friend?, ?ni t . hi? reailcr?. Thry may be interested in' learaiag that the jrooag historian ha? for three months been busy on the tigl-.tin?* lin' in Italy. He || m command of an ambulanc corps comprising twenty-five American car-. with sixty picked volunteer?, English an.I American. The ambulance com.m-.nd ha. been, so to apeak, ".???--> engaged" on th? Isonzo River. Trevelyan receiver! a month or mor? back the formal thank? of th.* Ital? ian commander, (Y?neral Caderas, fof Bit dlstincthre sendee in carrying <>rT th. under active shell 're, more than five thou -itti.i araaadad men. Trevelyan untes to bit father, the historian. Sir l.eorge Ott? Tre v?lyan. that he was that week ?Barking (treat) hour? in the twenty-four. He ?ays that he and h;s eaawades have "the.r hand? full and therefore their soul.? are at peace." 11?. rind? time, however, for ladlgaaat ut? terances in regard to the crushing ?>f Serbia, Bad t?. what he calls the "murder ..! Ar meiiia" by the ally of Prussia. Trevetjan, with direct knowledge of condition? in < on ? el ople, confirms the opinion that I had ? '. that 1 lift f.f the h the Prussian Ambassades is ?onstan would have ?topped the i assacre? in Ar? menia. The continued exigtenee of Turkey, the murderer of Kurope, depends on the good BTlll of Merlin, and this brings a very direct responsibility upon Merlin for the latest bar b?r:ti?? et th. Tiir?a. GEOB-I HAVEN PUTNAM New York. Dtc. l'J. IMi. AMERICAN SPIRIT TO DAY Quite Tamed, as Our Presid? Rightly Conceives. Edit t The Tribune. -ii : Your editorial!? on the Amen ? policy are nio?t interesting, an?! i stimulating ??. patriotism. But I believe icant factori your analy*- American attitude. ?' the I'nited S?a*e< t ; to reflect the emotional and met Ten?! of the people. Let us take the > Vork paper? as sn index of the sentiment th? American people. With the brilliant eeptioa of the Ne-.?- York Tribune and 01 two other leading papers, the sentim ??: the Pre.?? appear.? to be against war, matter what the provocation, and for pe at almost ar.y price. Is ?upport ?jf this statement ; refer to editorial comments and headlines of most ', c I'B**..rr. papers when Germany appes to back down after the Arabic sinking. Th was aaiversa] contrratulation for Preeid Wilson fer what then appeared tc be a gr i.nd bloodless diplo-natic victory. The do: t.ant note of the Press then wa? rel ticmer.dou.s relief, and perhaps gratitude our escape from a situation that had thre ?r.ed war. And the burden of that sonjjr relief was not "Remember the Lusitania" I 1 .rifet the Lusitamii," it "orgetfulness wo keep us out of war. Ha.?ing my opinion on the expressions the majority of the New York newspap. i.nd on the reactions of many New Y. audiences when war and peace were, discuss I am forced to believe that your conciusi ;?> incorrect that the majority of I Americas people want ??> a-enge the Le ? ; i-eance meal Purthernore, I believe that the attitude the American peep . I ? world crisis. i> ' rao t of their repr?sent?t! I lieu ?paper?, demonstrates tha' .'.meric ! psychology lias undergone s profound chan since the Citil War. W* ?aw the bcginnin 0* 'hat change in the American attitu toward the Virginias affair in Preside (?rant's time; al?o In the bitter opposition - - ? remember BfJ tbs Maine. There cot i b>* no greater or more significant rontrt Uhan that between the American spirit tO-day towaiil foreign aggression and t American spirit of 1776, 1112, 1847 and 18? Secondly In yonr criticism of Preside .\:'.sor. for In? conduct of ear foreign poll in Mexico and in Europe I believi have ove; looked sn important aspect of t Presidential fonction. A Preet-Jenl ,? sder, rvant of tha people. :.'. may act on hi? own initiative sodden emergencies where 'here is not tir |U of the people. At lea: that is s.? m theory. Bot In the prese OH the '.eight of the Pre?? of tl try - sgsinst war. President Wilson has therefore no op;i< I ut to obey the will of the people, or of mo ..:' the people, and he is faithfully doing s fhat tins la bia attitude i? shown by B ? hange of front about preparedness. Durir the early months of the war our peop id no interest or des.n? for militai Strength; in fact, they were rather hostile I Bol ?? ? ? . lei ?'" cama eoineidsi * ith the I? trisa of German victorie? and o;;r people I.? gnu to fear that OB! i. ight come, ard that it WOBld be safer I mm tor defence. President Wilson respond? to the people's demand at oine and began '. work for preparedne??. The majority of the American people n tha Loaitaaia horror. But. a? said bi ?hey do not wish to avenge it vi ngeance means war. Compared with th ,.nl of 1771 this B?ay not seem a nobl i as to seme; but then standards change, an *eem? to be the public attitude that no onti ? President, demanding ?hat h Bet iti accordance with it. Nr.. If the -pint of the American foreig policy ?>!' 1915 la not that of 177''.. I bility does not lie with tbs Prestdei but with tie changed American peopli ?li?se agent he is and whose will he mu? execute. C II. New Y..rk. Dec. ?. 1911, Our Humiliating Position. To tie Editai sf The Tribal i : In thi? morning's Tribune there was ilgned Benjamin Apthorp Gould whiel discussed the present humiliating positioi occupied b) th" American people. Tins is th ? ar.il OSl manly let *.*r I have SV4W r? a? in a newspaper. The only opinion exprease? winch I eriticiae in sny way is where he ?t?te that if. in his opinion, the American peopl \?<?re not nobler than the administration hi ? leek sell respect under an alien flag In mv ..pinion, as long as t!ie American peo I :?? eenaeal t?> be held la ?heir present hu nvliating position by one moral coward the; ;.rc n?> nobler than he is; and if they .-onsen to remain in this position until the end o the >'*r. or a year from March, when th< ? n| will be changed, any American wil ? ?! in seeking ?elf-respect nndei ar rlien flag, ss by so doing he will he provin?. for i " ipeet A E ? ORTIS. N? . ferh, Dee. I, Itl ? Fruitless Disavowal. In the Editor of The Tribune Sir: Being in hearty accord with your edi tonal policy ?so far as it goes i in condem? nation of thirgs Teutonic, and marking thf COBtroversy between The Tribune and "The World" regarding a "disavowal* is the cas? ? ? I leitoais, would it not be .? good . eertsin wbst Wilaea la going te ? I? ? ?4ith Ihi? disavowal when he ge'- t.' Ilb ??..i*ly. il ci.ri't be "hocked" te I i" le mono tary soi pe? stios for those bereaved; com pensation would be of im valy? to those ? red. and is there on.? except a hyphen? ate who would hope thai a disavowal would prevent a repetition of the offeree? (Juery: Why didn't Docker and the gunmen make a "disavowal".1 Their attorneys must have overlook??! a bet. Y. II M'CULLOCH. New York, l?ec. I*,, 1910. Not All Hyphenates. T i the K? 11f? >r of The Tribune. Sir: I?oes it not seem somewhat hysterical te apeas sf tSJtOSfiSt Germans in this coun? try, as or..- ??:' your correspondents did? I?, it r.nt equally hysterical to speak of all the German? in th s country a? hyphenates? 11 of the Germans of tny own ac? quaintance there is not the sign of a hyphen. BSSBS sf them are professed repub'icans. and came to this country because of that faith. The pre-? reports have it that many Ger? mans are preparing to return to Germany after the war. Perhaps they are. But I'd like to bet that they don't. T. J. LLOYD. Rloomingburg, N Y., Per. ."., |fl| On the Side of Right. To the Editor of The Tribun.-. >-ir: I hsve venfured to criticise the length of time you kept your columns open to th? t'tterances of the neo -copperhead?. Hut your "wn editorial utterances go to the spot and nie joy. There are strenuous times ahead for the American people. Kvery man moot push his pound on ?he side of right. , I incluse a few ounces of mine. The unex? pected may be our fate before ?.?..? are pre , parrd for the casting of the die. GEORGE w DITHRIDGE i llullia Terrace, Long Island, Dec. a, 1915. INSPIRATION. MR. WILSON ON PREPAREDNES? Consistency Not the Real Failing o the Administration's Policy. To the Editer ?? ? Tribune. sir: Yoai peral itenl sditei e im ?. President " ngno- on (id ben K. Chi sanely, ?? eonveraien t the appoaii toa taid that aft. -ature he declar?1 , most ' leal ne to be a l i.r- .an t from a leading of JT0 ttiri.'Y ? 1 r saying, "Almost tlio? . ' ??? |t I am ineretulingl* gli Theod : I tit, for a voU was nol ', ? ? "Mi. \\ II KM pare.!- ? 1 riS-BC, ? I itic ? .v in the ?lirectiof ?B wl ? ?! him tlunng thi OK. when In tad naval il i sngth you condemn I im .'or inconsistency on th< grout id ' ? .:.... tar age in tha' it bnr.K? party i . tiei illy mtt ..;.' \ i matter ot fact, yoar eherg? of ineonaiatenej ta correct by youi own quotatioi ? ?|uote tha Prai . ? ? -idence mus' not bt lading srmy but OB "a citi zenr. | I to Bl me," an.: then proceed to charge him with in? tency be.-au.-.' BO? ' greatCI I itand ii'.g army. foi 100,001 . i of 250,000 loldiera In ? ? does you do, m a itandins army. Hu? it ha had aabed f"i B large ?tend lag arm] h< ? ould have been ineoni i ,r Bgp, and >.. i would '. i bj )<>:. ' BOW. > Our only - that ht did net pros? plant '."r ; eilno.? in |0] i an?l he doe- present plai ? sew. Ypi all throut:':. the year >ou have been declanntr that "nee occasions" have taught "neu. diitie-." --.Inch Mr. Wilton has not per? formed. Soar, ?hen he seek? te perform such . eontistently v. it h tiie princip!?; lai?l down blame him still. It '... - ? ii Mr. Editer, at .. constant reader ot your ? thai the Republi? can beat ia ao ati cannot see 'i . cease.I to Condemn Amenta; of for irs Bet loyal :.. our govern menl which it proper enengl Would it not be well ' ? I ?-'?? ?? a litl ? Y loj - altv to the authorised head of our govern ment iaatead of practising hyper-cr?I with a view to discrediting thi Presid? the evs of all who lead your paper? VY W T DUNCAN, Pastor Jane? M. E. Church. Mr?.?.->:? b, Dee. a, Itlf?, The editorial in question ? .?ritten a? a condemnation oi Presl : '??? .n for inconsistency. Il open in z ten ten ee: "The el tt ntei it ? Presi? dent Wilton't m? l <-s in the e lach of evidence if offers of i education on hi? part." Mr. Wilson in Several Mask3. To the Editor of The Tribune Sir: An academical education has . Mr. Wilsea unlimited command of language. Stars arfVl come?I nance through his ad.lr.-sses :n all the mases "f metaphorical confusion; and his periods fall like music on our listen? ing ears, it is perhaps regrettable that the inspiration :? not always as admirable ?s its expi. ..... Rhetoric is ? good servnnt, but a bad master. Absorption in form may come to involve lot ? tnce. Mr. Wilsen'l pathetic tribute to the Ameri? can mann.-? who lost their lives m Mea..?? ? . list?e! the beauty of a t.-ijuiem ma??, but mournful word-, Bias, cannot recall the dead or negative ?".,. eoaseqaeaeos of mistake.) ac? tion. If Wa ?eek t?> penetrate the verbiage that enshroud? t'e Wh;!,. Howee WS c.nu seemingly into the presence of several Mr. Wilsoaa is this n r. ?ult t.f delaehra refrac Yon * There ?va? the Mr WUBOB who summoned butines? men 10* lbs bar in term? ni untern. I ?red severity. This was an au?' ie who would have justice done ? fell. Quite BBOther : Wilson confronta a different group of n i in attempts to destroy business t turnan livea by me unqualifiedly it'famous. Id?; thi? avowedly lawless body Mr. Wilson 1 ihown B temp?ratenos! and s.lf-eontiner that are remarkable. With the exception tha recall of an overseal?aa smbassaj mid a few deprecatory ad ii discernible in the undisturbed serenity thi B I Its Ii?.'. ?.-. There was the Mr. Wilson who of American shipping close to he? who did not hesitate to plead personal f..r B measure whose economic no. ind?sirable character had been bar bj e pert opinions. A very different Mr. W rough! himaelf to ?ign another b which promises :.. sweep the American fl from the sea?, with rather more complet than ct'uYi be daaa by ail commi ? ?hinarines acting in concert. Then wa have the Mr., Wilson who pr nonnced the natio- ? ides h ma*t o*" "merely academic ?nteres'" lit for an able people to play with. Another Mr. Wilsi becomes its champion and takes it so ?ci ?;ni? he eiHBmitl Ii sdvoeacy to writing. That it has ? grown in popularity might lead to an unfla 'ering distinction between the Mr. Wilson yesterdav and the Mr. Wilson of to-day. Finally we have the ethical Mr. Wl or? whom it was giver, to tes visions and drea dreams, who held that fidelity to the plight? word oatweighed all material profit or pe sonal ambition. He invited us by exhort: rl-nps. rather than by example ' mount to a higher moral plane, even thoug some thould Starve in the ascent. And thei ?S the practical Mr. Wilson, who appears 1 : in ?eekitig a renomination, wit an almoat humorous disregard of a certai plank m the platform on which he ?too be Baked for the votes of the Amer can people. The practical deduction WOuU appear t be that ?? vote for Mr. Wilson could hav no assurance of attaining its desired end i the event of hi? succeeding himself. betaut the votes might easily bee..in > confused am". the shifting lights and shades unon whic I have touched HOWARD I OGHILta Morriatown, NY J., Dec. 1. IMS. ? Star Spangled Banner" Alone. T?. the Editor of TTie Tribune. Sir: Referring to your recent editorit lote regarding a national air, the followim '? quoted: \ aaBli ftoa Jaty it lit? 171 -iforrnlf tha fcllowlr.i ? -....rningr and ? ??? ' ? ir B CtBBS t wi.. ? :? win j?ia> At non! ? y ?? s- ?i ?UM ? ging to tita aai ? ? irt Im ita aa tas ?*r.a!g;n m'k 'T tru.-k In aai I I | t tt ' ?Il (roun-l In hauling down. I? Y THACT, leerstery if the Navy The n-gulations for the government of th'1 navy for 1905 state that "The Star-Spangled er" shall be played at both morning and | ciiiors, and this has been the practice tn?l regulation ?ince that time. "Rail, Ce> lumbia!" - i el Bger wed aa a national air. K. A. Kim M, Lieutenant IY S. Navy. New London, <'..?;n.. Nov. II, Iftll, Act on 'Bus Franchises. To the EditOI of The Tribune. Sir: Just a word regarding the awarding of additional franchises for motor "bus oper at!.in. -.?Inch I have followed m the daily papers. This matter has been delayed month after month. The Hoard of Kstimate seems to consider the return to the city in dollars Y is meet important factor. Surely the com? fort, safety and all 'round service of the Fifth Avenue loach CoBtpaay te the resi? dents ..f New York cannot be excelled by any company, and with the additional lines, as 1 aaderataad them, the ?"rviee ail] be most adequate. The present service is good, so far as it gees but it ?hould be extended. When the |ir.'?ent company proposes to do this, and in addition offers a ?urn mounting to million?, the Beard of Esthaato should act without ootog. A.n. - brook!*,n, K, V., Dtc. 4, 1915. OUR THREEFOLD DUTY To Avoid Entanglement, Prona? ind to Woo Latl ' ami i !? To the Kditor of The I I All America -? ? -4 one blatantly pro-) stbB Illy, Why an?! I . SBS infinitesimal For us i -??cte-i ? ai.?I enjoj ing tha v ? .?'??? benignant nature to ' 1 e Germany foi ?; k*r be isa. and to wa ?B oaf - hu inanity und dem a smug and compta? . .-.,.? 'tien si .; ' !n.b<?r- to re? . -menai commerda rlooaly hampered by a la?-. ?. fla? r.cdod colonies where I to manhood in the sancti:':?* -n *' German Kultu; .:ri countr:' ? -st (' to the empire. Bat bel < '??'? "?' direction of a ? ..wet, virile nation a wholly ne ? SSs IB checkmated at PowaSS Street. Germany taced at each 'ire ?*? menace of the 1 : r.i~ e ' g? lata ! ? Gfw' Bg that S .- '**>'?' ????n ?any Btroeh It? a Her cynical dial '? ?"?"*? and her retrogression to ? ' ? barbarian era when warfare ss wheDy brutal. Inhuman and deprav '4 alienated neutral sympathy. Undoabtedly Germany's .?? ItB -1 means are different, bot ara sa tasS equa?y imports fcO? a detached p> rapehtivs both seems ent:r?:y n stleBB cannot be judged by the ?,. " ' moral'.*-.- a? Individoals, Bad tl the Individua! ?:?? -trids?' when refined by national As an American, I prefer to se? a let I lefeat of Pression smbil minion rather than s <d ! Kr.'.er.te Powers that I 1 -.fias* ??gemony of Europe. W 1 ? ' ?r ?*' tween the '*"' inconceivable josl ' ' ? of two nations, i never wholly parallel esel Hritain can hardly be I excessive enthu? of American crip taliatl ' 'r* in competition with her and tl,er.'! ? ? ?. ? In the ever.? of 0 I * reived In ? ?? land feel irr.i ? '.'. rl ? e not surreptitiou her Nipponese ally? Thu?, our doty la three' "'-."' ahool? refrain from BBgOgl : ? "? ?f''' alliances with I seCS04 *** should enforce a inrge ? 1 sf ?? naval and a judicio.i military stren?f' " to extend our InCT? ship with our B ??ward the creation of a : ism which would fBOIBI '? ??? the II of that BSOBterpieee ship, the Monroe Dei tl I J I' PI East Orange. N. J.. 1>. Expectoration from Above. To the Kditor of Th.? Tril Sir: Is there 00 law prohibil Bg '-T* toration from the p1 . "?? ' * vated trnins, or 1? ? '"? *" ' nart of employes of tin? la! ?uch law is so flagran' H ?*?* from the ovill of BBJ " '"?'?'? ' . often marvelled at the Otter disregSIO ?S ?xpeetorating slevated tr?. ;?r_ ?nuliitude paasing to ?ni lene? Of the habit ??n my hut tl ? BSlBBBSf has at lost moved me t<> phi?; siRIAN. N?w York, Doc. -, Uli.