New-York tribune. [volume], January 06, 1916, Page 8, Image 8

About New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924

Image provided by: Library of Congress, Washington, DC

                
TARIFF ON DYES
?rED AT ONCE
Wilson, Favoring the Bill,
?lopes to Wring Conccs
sions from Germany.
MANUFACTURERS FI AR
'DUMPING1 AFTER WAR
Herman Met* to Repmef*. the
rhe-r-ical Societ] ai the
Con--res-. Hearing
: . - . Bonsai
W ?nhir-./rten, Jan. I
I v ?onirress to BTOTlds P*'
i on dyest fa, wit
? | I of the
?ndu?:- ? ? - ??<-?, will he nrp*.|
?? ^"a.v* a**d Vetsr.? i
? ','iiufo of R.
ary 14 by reprs -?
? v | of
s I
.iced by Reproeental
?
? ?
?
It ie believed 1
i it
..r.t the h
-
??aw a peri
-
epei
........
Hr'.tr
itufl
?
? ?
?
? ff kr# ?
mem
- | ? ...f .
?
?
f thei
.- '
. . .
?
?
?
?
You are welcome at the Max?
well Hotel Headquarter?, Rootnl
101 an.) 103, th. Biltni-.re
+
GIFT BABY HAUNTS HER
i.nt Moth, i I ?i- Si\ of Her Owe, ??'<'
lot,mt ?.iH** to Helles ue.
"That babv haunted m? ?11 nifht
'. ? t it; I liBve six of
?
,-h?setTer. of SI*. Em(
. third street, shrugged hoi
.- ? a? she told at the
that ?as left ?t
leaday night
nk i could have rrabbed it?
* he i>H??e,t right by me a? I
re, but l never gueesed
(i fr a present for me she'll
Such ? mother! "
. Bothered in the bail
baniaters to extol ,
the ai nynuMia beb*.
? that unhapplneea would be
. creel mothei
? " said ons wosaaa, j
said another.
mfnnt aucka its |
waiting for a
AUTOS THREATEN
HORSE SPEEDWAY
Highway Official Urges
1 Old Reservation Be
Opened to Public.
f one of these dark nigr'-r
Speedway, from l??th to
treet, will be the scene of r.
? ? ng. A riaing vote of pro
taken by the ahadei of the
? '..vers now
! Speedway !
called beei a a of the
riah turning I 11 i ismbera
.n their graves at the lateft insult to
?
\? OUgk thnt croak
nea i ? runabouts
ivi I the horse to the curbing!
I thai the
la lison Square Garden, which |
Peacock Alley of the ;
... . ? with n,
: . . i can
? -
I - Depart-1
?int re- j
?
. j., ned
; ' -.very.
D? ?
made
tral - on x'r.\- r
period of aeven daya
? morning till 7 at |
. nly ?'-11 v.
I, uaed the driveway.
?
. ..
mately (10,1
, ? payera
?
v kcadei
'*. irtue, who
of mind.
? ?
-
?
'
:
' ?
?
and ;
... George
?
'
? . drive; 0
l' tier, all of
? ? ? Speedway. "But '
.? ' all
i ? idemy,
and uni
?
? n obile. Perl ap?
Tun Ven
:\e proces
V rtue, would
? ignedly at th.? la?t
Final Plea for Teacher's Slayer.
- : ," '.. lay to
ive A ni on,..)
i'.<- a Krenu-r.
I hool '..acher, from the '
Sncicer Miller.
' 'arden atirchwey, nn
T,e I'arbier, coun
aalt the Governor
BU make a motion I
. new trial. I? will be si ? '?
JVered evidence riro\f-<s Peti
I insane.
Chalmers for Preparedness.
ic bel lei
*? ? v, rnilitni y
? ?? and a geni
? ? f : re
Detroit motor car
? -ok direct
ewa of nis fellow ein?
er. Henry Ford.
, who | *t the
during the Automobile
' automobile
mpathy with Ford'?
i la, .... need in no un
- Jit-any-price
advo?
neaa "en genar
? ? c....iii.i v are In
,
? - " l'n.' likV y,
ild by
all tr ? -a par with the
pean power?..
ever, 1 a matter latgely of
.
a other bend, i? a
every employer of men
- in a position to
mpmoi t of New
at I'lnttshurg
how much could
feature of tram
laelude the h-.
i of workmen la all section I
"We i 5,000 men at the
? ? a I balmera company.
In my opinion a plan could he
tha ? ? * ? five yean e-. sry
one ? ? spend i month
' Ban .ce, under the
?r army ofl cers,
??e men should be
?" the expense, be
? . look
. -luld not afford
elieve, howevei
the men should ? liar' (,f it,
not h? - ng a
? r country's service
? ? . part
.i be willing to
llaril s of my our en
dm ? C theaa thirty day? f.f
II ? ? " "'r si smployera
agree to thr ?ame plan.
i of ( It th? rr.ar.u
intry a ronslder
- the next rive years, bat I
? ?? he their Juet cor'rihu
? ; repaiedness."
PIERCE ARROWS
verv ?"??'.rat ? late rnni*?l
.. .<! touring can
h. ?pl?l .111 i onrtitton. In
?lid fully
Twi itea ?o
... i Hull
? ? ? ? , ?
I I a f ?8| ?
i i I I- mu iiik CAB ?CO.,
' . -a.-, la' v
Maree Arrest Agent? tor New Jereej
What Is the Gary Plan r
B*ALICE BARROWS FERNANDEZ
Tribune readers uHll find in this department a
clear and authoritative account of the Wirt school
system, proposed for this city. Questions of parents
and teachers will be gladly answered. The de?
partment will appear en Mondays and Thursdays.
WH\T THE Wllf PlaAN POiSL
It lake? children off ?l_? street?
?nd kri?p? them who1r?omrlT bney
?? work. ?tuiN and pla* for ??i * ?<r
??Ten hour? ? Ha*
ll five? all children )u?l a? much
academic work m the traditional
achool, bat br Irnjjrthnung thi? school
day It i/lree time for practical ?hop
work, science, drawlnf, music, audi?
torium and pLny for all ? hinlren.
W1UT THE WIRT ri.AN MF.AN9.
To wir)- parent?K ?hance to ft??
hi? child the enriched educational
opportunities usually reserved tor
the children of tho f?ror?r?d te*.
To tewcKem?No mor? hour? of
teaching; moro congenial work.
To the community?Be?ter cttl
?ens. better schools for le?? eoet.
loward W. Nndd Refutes Attack of Superintendent on
Gary Schools?Says Estimates Statistically Unsound
?ConUnuoui Use of Plant Lcononu? <il.
Many r ties he-ides New York an
:he throes af excited ?seneslen i
the Gary plan. In Chicago a cumpa
for the adoption of the plan has l>
On for ?orne time, ' lei cl?
after years of bitter discussion on
iubj< ct, is nelly i is
features of the plan until the title
"dotible-plntoor." system. The wo
"(jary plan" are often non gra'a
those who hnve charre of our edu
tional system?. Not ?o In New .1er?
however. Three New Jersey tot?
have recently installed the plan. <
throuch the efforts of the SupcriatOI
Set of Scheoll a:nl the other thron
the inistive of tie Beard of Edu?
tion. 4'olumhv,?, Ohio, has also ?tart
a campaign for the plan, and a Yoiir,f
town. Ohio, newepaper recently se
a representative to Gar* ?' ? ly a
write un the ?vstem in a series of a
srt'cle?.
Campaign in Minneapoli? for (?a
Plan.
BWever, o: | of the live
est contest.? on this aobject has be?
carried o'i In Minneapolis durine tl
laal - - r. Last fall City Suj
Schoola Spaulding of U i ?
endeavored to prove tl it It wou
co?t more to operate the Mini
school? on the Gary plan than undi
the traditional rystem. "The Mlnm
'a member of II
11 to Garj to Htudv the system, an
he retun cd with much (
the schoola at Gary ??
nomical. but of ?,'re-." a ' ?1 I her?
t to th? ?'? > the conf
raced. I- tl e meantim? th* opponent
of the Gar; r?an in this city quote
Spaulding*a itet
widelv h? proof that the Gan ''.an wa
costly.
In -. of 1 ? advertisement of Mr
Spaulding'a report as a correct estl
a cost of the (iaiv schools
???ter from Howard W
tor of the I
?lould be ol
I .1 those interested
r .
To the Editor of The Tribune.
Sil I hose nrho are seeking to oh-!met
the <? ? i.ury plan
Kan York < ity school? have been lay
in*- much ?tress of lute upon a recent
atetemi nt of Superintendent Spauldmj-,
? i 'dis, in which he M-eka to
show, after making certain stn* I
corrections, that it would eoat upward
(.f ..'? per eent moie to opei
neapolis schoola on th* ?Jary duplicate
school plan than it would on th'- ?
Ing i.a?is of h reserved ?*??! tor every
child. If this be true, the natural in?
ference il that New York or any other
i ity srmuld hesitate lonjr, on the ground
of economy alone, before reor?aniT-inf"
its ach rding to Mr. w r*,*- pro?
gramma.
Continuous Operation of fans '.usine???
fiant Economical.
i . eei
-
rr?:-?-n:_
i ever, to the experience of larga bui
ne-,* institution^ during thi> last ha
century, In which tha aeon??my <>f rui
Hing n phuit 1" ?
universally eat? WOU
..", tramai; tant to ?cnitini;
carefull) Mr. Spauldii ? - tat? i
i order to determine whether there
h ni m the natura ?>;' tha
? ntinuous "i
? ?i i... r, . penslvi than
tinuoui opera! ad? th< refere, sul
?i to reu: ?mit IM
diametrically ti af those cot
Th
,-ern to t_J
sr,,l educator? alike, for the publl
i It? of Sew \ arl
of r.? property ?kk?*'
I f 1 ? and its
?
, \ ic?-. ? ?Uni . is on
of the Ui in the con?
try, and ihould, therefore, b? run a
? ? plr?.
??renier \ ilue Received for S.ime s_
pendltarem,
I? considering this question it is im
? ' - in mmd, in t>.< I -
i luce, that when one typ.
tion ii aid to I"- moi tnical thai
er :t mi,?>' ? ' '?' meal
? that fewer il'l'.nr.a nr, 1er th
than under tin
bul that
ci?? iter valu? ii i cured. If, fo
example, two woi : eaeli -pen,
I
regard aa mora i ne wh,
I the i
Mr. v. ;rr has Dol claimed thai Garj
i? >pe?,riin(: laaa per capita on Iti
.n ar>- i.'lier ,?? ntB initie?
' but, tuth. r. that for a given expand
gas ar?
'i : Igh the dup.
plant than would be pos
.,1 form ol
1er the for
de a?
much pac? and eciuipmenl foi em-h o?
? he lat?
ter, b? BUS? n par; ,
me i
he lat
? ? m i
I ? He
erel fall
. us np
about ona
half ? 1
.
I pools, iri?
laboratories or
or for the i of th"
- i? of elaai? . ft\ ?? ? ?? total ex
penditara in Gary might thus equal the
total expenditure io anothei com
riunity, the educational a,
?ured m Gary would h>. mueh greater,
although tha time naualli allowed for
acaileini,; instruction it, tha trad l
? ?rould in no ? .
saei r ced.
SpauldingM l.-limale?? Statntlrall* I n
?niiiiil.
It won Id therefore seem tha- Vr
ding fails t?> make a t'a rap]
Btlva costs in Gary i
Minneapolis, when he coinpar?- th? pet
rai',Ta eoatS o- tha t'.ao nOBt r
scnool buildings \n Gary with tha n?r
capita eosta of the average srhool in
M;nnenpoli3 without stating th?
onal advantages secured hy
: rocedurc wl
tieally unp
?ut of I
queatlon of comparativa values It la
estremely unlikely tn?t every aehoel In
Minneapolis afford? ??Il af lia children
tin aepertunities for- -*oiU. ited** ami ?
plaj for eight beers a <1?v which ?re
afforded >n the ?lion?, laboratories.
playgrounds, gymeestems, awimmleg
pools. Iibrnrie?. Hudltoriiini? ad regular'
claaareoma of the?e two Gary achoola.
It Is mote likely that lh.- M iimeiipoliH
aehoola, with tlwir ?cute part Urns
problem, furnish the .i?me limited eda
eationel opportunitiaa which ?re afford
led in the traditional five boni" day af
academia Instruction in most Amaricen I
cities.
The real quest ion, from the point of
vt*w of economy, i?. whieh would coat
'he City of Minneapolis mon* i., pre?
ride for all of IU children the faeilftiea
afforded by Mr. Wirt ia Gary the tu?
ent type af school s*nfenlsation, in
which a largo proportion ?f 'he plan',
would always bo Idle, requiring B cor?
rcspondingly greater amount of space
and equipment for every fecil ty, 01 'he
Gary duplicate school type af organisa
tien, In which all ?>f the fa< Hit i would
be In operation all th" tune and a cor
r, ipondlngly loaa smoent of ?pnce and
aquipmenl required for rvary anal
Fstiniates of Per Capita (?ist? ln?or
Aside from ignoring 'his fundamental
1 point, however, Mr. Spsuldiug hea made
? -, ? : al statements, which, when further
explained, invalidate hi?- conclusion th?'.
the Minnespolia sebe?is would eost
j much more per capitia if' they were re
organised an the Gory pian Kor sa
ample, h<> cite? th?* average alan
teachers m Cary as 1849.67 and in
Minneapolia a? ll.l?al.70. and eoncludea
'hat if the salarias In Gary ware Beads
equal to thoBS in Minneapolis the per
capita eosl of instruction In Gary would
be $36.14 toed of $17.11, as agalaat
. i -' in Minneapolia. II" fail to point
out, hi tl at according to theas
very figures th< arenga ... *
?ii Gary ia IU, - I
Minneapolia. If Mr. V> in hould in
tii ?uf of hla .la ?es aboul l'I
prr cci.t t., roi respond to thoa?
Minneapolis, H is obvious thai he could
reduce ip ta eo I af inatruc
' ??' the
, difference In pi r eapita coat dus t.. the
SCale. The ques
tien might therefore be ralead, how1
much more thai at present would it
cost to reduce the sue of rla??es In
Minnespolia $0 per Bant under the ex-1
If one takes
Into ? ?r*r.i"...i, i,nt only the e\tria
but a a the ex? m clai -rooms
and th? required to I
I operate the neu buildings needed to
1 hou i the ??? add
Moreover, in calculating tha per,
i ..; ta Ce I af ovet !.. I Mr
te make an imp?
? ticel eoi reel lea In M inneapol ?
tha i ara i ana ing far aboi a c*
?. . i . tl
of the part time problem, while th?
eh Mr. Spauldlng
... for eomperiaon are run
I ? ? tima ,
oi Mr. Speulding' I ia en-?
ol wa?
B96 and in the Froebel IJM7. although
the ca| eacl i*,40fl
Itically it is manifestly ansoui . I
compare the per capita cost of the two
plans, without weighting the data in
luck a way SI to eliminate *.
which have nothing to da with 'he
ms such. If the per eapit i
I has? an an enrollment
which run? the schno] system even be?
yond ea ? ' ? t be a umed
er sv-terri ial-o be run to ca
pacity; otherwise tha relative seonom?
Under
1'nrnnt he accurately
It the 'wo ?iary schools svere rur,
. as are those it. Mm
? i ind had '* total enrollment
. . f th? 12 which Mi
Spaulding used, It t that there
? i.- ? ,4 r< d ict;on ?>f ap
BO! Cen? . ri the per?
ms a? principal?'
anitora' wages, feel, water,
ll 11 ern-n', interest on in
vestment, etc. i ne per capita CO
of pril for example.
. l ? ? redu "??d fron *i l?. to I
and for the interest on in- |
, ? ? ? $11.66 1 $6.1
letioa, how?
I haVB been in the per capita '
eoat of -. Bpeuleing |
r* vea as s.'O'j. With the foregoing eoi
reetion In enrollment l? ia ?
dwindled to $166, which la not ex'.rava
rant svhi>n compered with the $166
quoted as 'he <-.? ? af the av?r?t?" "
neapolia school if one bears In mind,
'? paulding pointa out in another
the two Gai
.-?re new atid modem in every reaped
? I ? play, ahep, end
a i other facilities abo.e referred
i larga number of the Min
? i ? ;.re very old ai -:
tain very few of such factl '
' aet of Ke-scr-eil Seat Plus Enriched
Actis ?tie*.
Here again a question would be perti
nent: what would be tha per capita
cost of replocing all of these old
i-chools In Minnear.ol.s by i ri ??'
inodern construction life Gar?
end provide, in addition to
? ? ivory child, tha ipecs and
A PROMINENT Chicago automobile editor who was
present in Racine, Wisconsin, at the "unveiling" of
the New Case 40. was enthusiastic over its wonderful
performance. After being present at several tests ot the car,
he said,- "Its performances were little short of the marvelous."
By the way, have you seen, at the show, the Case 40 in
orange and black and uphol?tered in seal brown and cream
stripe? It's stunning -and mechanically it is fully worthy
of the respected name it bears?Case.
J. I. CASE T. M.COMPANY, Inc.
Broadway At 62nd
New York City. U. S. A.
" .
f fi
?j*\>a,rldUvtf
eqnipment Which WOUld he required
ander 'he traditional typ? of school
organisation to tunk?? it possible foi
pn.ally all of ?he children to une
al ??lie time facilities r.,riip?r?1ile to
these offered In Gary?
If further evi'lenre a?, ic [?ceiled tO
?.how how tho per capita CO I slwny?
iries ??-?-orilliig t., enrollment, one
might ?"imply compare th? per capita
i of the two Garj ; aol i i a? b? I
iiml Emeraon. froobel has the large.?
enrollment and, Uierefore, as would be
tod? its per capita ce il i ? ai ach
|.,v,,-r than th? j.?-r capital COat ?'?
Emeraon, despite the fact 'hat II hu
a iiiurli larger playground ?nil more
elaborate equqlpment than Emei
In, per es-.itu eo?ti ar?- ii" folloWai
I,,-t ruction Kmersnn, J.lrV'!?', ; l-'rix-he!,
| ?, , ?. operation Emei ion,
?roebel, leMO; maintenance Emer?
son, $K.L'!>; I'roelis'i, $:i.'j7; total eat
rent eo?t Emeraon, |MJ0; Proebel,
vi?; ;,?,; to'al ?in?, af school property
Emeraon, $4J'?.;/<; I roebel, |?24 '?
l-'lnallv. in ??'I? ??' at Us* apparai
with which It fini been found I'.
to lengthen the school daj an kaat
for th? children In the Wirt school? In
', era ? ity, wir bout ?engt hei mg
the school day for the teaehere, ana la
sd to i" omowhat surprlaod thai
.Mr. Spaulding should add $9.19 t"r
or an ?ncn ? s af 20 per c-n'
to tec.. , ,ries j,i it i><-< luaa 'ba
I . |, ngthei i d
Allniieapi.ll? S, lirx.U on f.arv Plan
\\i,iii?i Caat Less.
If, therefor.-, th? -airie '??''? '?'
paid ir, both eitiea, ?rid it due allow
anos is also marie for the foreg
correction? of Mr, Spaulding'i Bgur?
it ?HII be found 'ha? th? $91 - ? q at? :
n? the Tier I ? ' of ' ' ? - ~ ?,,
Mmneap'ili" I? lool? 01
srhieh is 16 p< i
proaoail per capita
?
th? great!? ntid
fere?]
per (
rie?po! 1 schools
?if rur. - ?r -,
All <.f ?rbicfa would aeei - ? ,
? " ' '
? tit in th?
? , ?
?
fu'iire progre?i r -
t ration must
i ?
tor r' ?
S I
If
UnitedlStates,,
-*\i
?KTO^Mriii
__ m
Tires
]?"JJ "
mj^MS?._
??
iiV. '
?l'il ? I; ii ?
lli!ll'lll"'l!h":' '??.' '.
-?" '.""i"-*!??;'- |?|-p?iiiiiri'iij?jii.1 i?!.i?i!!?!,,-i>,ii" ' ? ? *
lii.L, t.iiiir,:iiii:,'ii:.ili^..'' .:,.:..i.?i;.i.:?i.,'::..::/?!.i.:./..vt '..': .::.
1916 Announcement
Extraordinary
The New Year bringt* a wonderful n?ew tire?the United State?
'Utco' Tread.
Think of it?a really wondeT?iil new anti-skid tire priced at only ?i
little more than plain treads.
The 'Usco' has been tested, tried, and proved to th? point of
complete .service-satisfaction.
Already entitled to bear the honour-mark of the great Company
whose name it represents.
Sturdy, dependable, and ? priced phenomenally low for an anti?
skid tire.
So low that even we were astounded (and delighted) at our own
success.
The United States Tire Company will make 1916 the economy
year in tire upkeep.
Factory methods brought to an efficiency never before dreamed of.
Tires brought to a dependability which is practically standardization.
The United States Tire Company's 1916 policy brings to tir--*
dealers and automobile owners a
?full line of "individualized tires**
?full value in tires
?full service in tires
The great four-page "announcement-in-detafl" in this week's
Saturday Evening Post | out today tells you the big things the United
States Tire Company ha** done to make 1916 the automobile owner's
year of tire economy and tire efficiency. Read it?carefully.
United States Tire Company
"Individualized Tires"
Usco ' Tread, 'Chain ' Tread, 'Nobby ' Tread, 'Royal Cord,' and 'Plain ' Tread Tires
?BW
ipi,
HHii?-?|ii**-***-f!>?***>*'.I i' ".'if*!1.'"!. A\'
iiml?iiiii
'fi?jSakaSA^a&SL
m
-?11!,,?,.*-,-*.,, ., J ljSp,)|*s*^!?p|l'JI').|
l|l ll'il
THE HONOCIl MAKI
-c
Yf A CHLXI CUaVU-ANV
'???H iMl l i H mi?.
?irtsr
?
Closes .January 8
NOW
OPEN
Grand Central
PALACE
Admission 50c
10 A.M. to 10.30 P.M.