New-York tribune. [volume], January 25, 1916, Page 8, Image 8

About New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924

Image provided by: Library of Congress, Washington, DC

                
Sutm Hath ?ritanu
i r ?t lo Last?4 h? In'' Sews -l.lllttri.il
? \i'\ rr I iirnifiit??
I 1 r?.i> \\ 1 \M M.*?
-w-* . ? ? ? ? ?. ? ?
? . . ?
i ? N
nipona? ni s m
? .. -
....
1 . A S
I ?
' M
T>A1' ? ,\n M >
"
?
l?- ? ?H
< ? ?M
t a '?
DAIM
? ?
lit-ra.1 a. '. ' ? I ?
Vim ran ptarrh?
in THF I RIB1 NE safety?foi
?f -tiaeatisfartion rewtta In an*, rase THF
TRII.i \ ? | sai ate. - I ? i ? ? ?">''
1??"ik BP?ra ? Sa OO ??nll>
hlln?. *.\r ni a. . J if Iht ail
t f M |.fr t1... -
America anJ Europe.
. . .
lo Amei ?es. ma
? - . ? .
the vi ? . ihy fell
In thi?- c ' for
cause v '
growing I bitl
?
pa
?
f r thi -
1 y whal felt in the
?gaatj
n wholl) nd in the
j rnp'.o who
rally i
?
that Ihcy tir- of Mli
ration s
tioris which. nit h.
line to haza
faith.
Now, tli h of Americans sympa?
thize with 1
Britisl
and eppr< rial this
1 ranee. "? '
Hat?
many Ai
to the front or to tl
ha- !
Looking ... ? ,,1C 0f ,.UT
. . Vi .
It pot
f-prvice rendered by the Bi
nations 1
conceh? that ' ting for clvili
rati'-r for 1
fry, foi ?'? preservation of thi
?iemr>crati<* experiment which i? th<
Mate?. And what wi re Trance and Great
Britain ?
The l'n ?-.?], I '.- jl? NapO
leon, ?
the British G - him in
aiding tl th o] Ily. In
;.iiiii':
the Mexican E s Haps
i ?arg Boveri g
I ? i ? ? lii
?if all Amerlci
what was 1 I erni
the Ala e is the
\ T I
Il the South, 1
W iht
whlcl ' y
I urtr at I
th?-?
.
1 r;,-' ? ? ..f this
i atioi ? this i
hardly ? Let th?
lack through I f their own news?
j apers and aid i f Abra
1 am Uno In In the
let them ?
newapaj era ?'.ritain;
let Un m ?coi 1861
*SB a Washingi l-'16,
M i time, that
In Englai d ai d Fra ' i be an
'uation,
l*ot in ten
i t- it tal ttitude of
k 1 .' :
H France, at the
^"Were y\:
V? f r< ?
pr? ?
It is thing to be?
lieve thai
< ur f< ? on Its
on '? truction
??f lif?
"too proud i
to sad ...
the '
ago with the words
Shall w? democracy
by tl..' words *?nd deeds of :
l.?on in i -? i '65? Shall '.
Itriti ? ? y ? ith Ami i ind it ex
bted by ''.ule and i
Or by th" fashion ; ; which I
chants trade I in o and nia?
fortune?
We 1 nol ? v. e have for?
i time. We have
-
th?' r rita did ?
solid ? We have
given t.. i ? '.liii out
of all priii"-.' tioi to v. hat they j
We all whp symj with the
MUM feel UWl wl . : ? t ? i r i give*!
too liti!< ; '? .? WOUld
<L??> II."I ' .
Hut ?;? . ! -. ? : the Bril
i few Amei ? ed the
War from m the
balligen ? I i
Intolerai I ? the American attitude and
of Amei ican sentimei t. It is I
all these turned 1 the Civil
Wiir ?ui?j i. bed ilit'ir mem? i
On the !.. * day of July, 1911, Gn at
Britain, with her existence ai stake, with
her French ally in deadly peril, hesitated.
Buch tiarx-rs |p ?'| |;, M;,. , l;l. ,,.r Guar?
dian" told the British people that Great
I n had no dut?? In the premise
British public men held lo this viei
fium Bad ?been Invaded. >
the 3.000 mile ? thai ? ? pat -'i
Atlantic seaboard from Europe lh<
between London ai ?I Sai
? h .imentatori
. impatient and censorioti
. lure '??' undei land I hi
: .-eil llie n
men, undi r u hoi e < yea ihc : torni ha<
rat lu ring for in.?re than a dot ail
heetletl and ;
v ? ., arar never 111!?!'"
? hem.
?' 1. ?,,- Ih itain, most of Prance, I
lo see m ?>ur v'ivil War the bat!
ertj ?nu! natiunal
?americana of I <
\\ e dared, Buffered,
' mir fight ' ? '
uf h< j we 1 ad I "in 1
? Mexico i!' ?1 '
Vlabama.
\ ho return fi ?m a I
er, fr
i .it lust roused ;
: ' 1 already |
price dead, are urn..'
is, bittt
of their ov ni ce, ind
?hness. They despair ol
hi ; 1st ? ? I ' ?
-ami ?ca? ".. Then they give
? ?on to the suspicions of 1
country a
make ? of
the situ t exista in Eu
: more every day America)
.? lo the meaning to them ol
? War. More and more ai
?
Id en ? -y. the
If tve Iun" slept, ?Hi'
? p between 1895 and
Did t . ?? ! I ? ?
from 1905 to U'll and awakt
Americans nn inju
that we are nt once awa
our bacl
duty ai :' ??
?? of Lincoln tha I laid
tribute tvl
. ?-? of previous insult and 1
we have been blind, that 1
?
: ? ril.
time to t ? sm nl?T
- ?
at hon e. We
if in forget t
France was silent and the French Govi
? '
??ni'?I.
Such failure a? there has bei
.1 ran safely be left I
cans to deal with. Those
proud to ficht" beca
.:.-' ? said it was will
into our history. Manyofuswii
understood the
e them. M
i wi.-h 1 ' sibla to do in a 1
? . ......
pe in the last century I
ii i- no ' is what 1
? -j ing lo ?
?
1 ? ? . ' homo, con :
the moment with the Frai
? tin of in-day. As well compare
France or the England of 1861
North and South, in 1
sani*? hour.
A great deal of effoi I
? ?? judiciously, s?-.tne unwisely, in <
dea1 explain France ?v ?I Gr<
-?mericans. 1.
: ? ans 1
ntry I e in terms <
i.i .*. Our
? the European
racles, ai I '.' ? are learni ig quitt as f?
. 1 ranee a
Great Britain In our ease. Toi
' is is unjus! and t?> n ?sundei
? ?
More Air Raids on England.
ent Bir ral'' | ?
ne at leaat wai ;" ? ? ...-.
rack'? and work ? at 1 >?r ?
eg, of c >ui -?'. froi ? I
? r the Brit
War ( Iffi ?? 'I first Ol. .'. Bl
, . ? ? . :
an airplane over "the east coast of Ki
i ntul a second etin atta?
.; ' .
I I by tl
rntneni reau thai
poasi
?
mus! wait Berlin, but ii
thai 1 dispatch conveys the hii
.? ".1 large proportion of In I
is aware of tl s exact locality,
The absurdity of the usual official re!
cenca ii ?particularly apparent on ,:
? . ? - tha nttark, wherever it wa
. took placo -n broad dayligl I
it is tolerably certain that the 1
knew where they were.
It is unfortunate that the censor shoul
think it necessary to make so much mys
? the 1 latter, for, as 1 ? ? 1
paper, "The Times," remarks, "Berlin i
?bt informed by this time, and in 1
day "r two, if tl r pe? we .-ha!
publish an accurate accounl of the localitj
Gen .? "'jr.-es."
Both of 1 tie raid.- were, in a
probability, undertaken p n - to fe<
out the defences, and may ?possibly be f I
: before long by ?something mon
. lable. According to all act ? . ?
? pi took part iri them, the German
. ish reports ng thai only
?urjilai.es or ?seaplanes were en ;
There nevi r was any reasoi I
the 1 I ?d the least intention
?
- ind, and of late tl ?
? popular '
They alwa) did appeal to the in 1
turn of the German piopl ? ;.- th<
and mo I effertive wa) of punishing the
?Enjfl ah.
I it .* a long tune now-?more than three
montl I . ? aided b)
. l-.it ?i i. highl) impi
the temporary immu lit) of the metr?
i in lun .1 by the i ?? i ftsction of ?
. ? ? . ; a toi
f in? Ion itj. : i n < 1 it i
t will !"? on ?i gi
han any hithei
Where H ta the Money Go?
..i ni' \i
ii u.i bul highly il charge
boodle and coi porate att?
11 mmittec' public i
. \? Id i ? public a hi iff i
ment of his coi
i ituation doubtless would p
clarified. His c ill) hi
. .1.1,1. He
turned ba?
from the Kale of stei
tli-i't.
Senal
, nun?!11 ?? !.1 well and econonil
. , |. i- . ? : have
? bodies
? 1 1
Haj wai tl. the I
. t'li :i it .
-. ', 1 ?vis, a li pul.
., . : ?. dar salar). 1 :
by the committee. By
b of I tem of steno
: rom a liab
to a profit, 1 ese tw? it?
are a\?
?
? ommittee'a work. The q 1
thcrefoi ated : W i
has the
?
1
? it had and
ret ever) ody w?
'
it?
'.
1
Prostituting th Cockran Dignity
.
H
'
?
?
I a fn
t
?
te, ] .
An accusation was 1
? -, but a blaze of
. ? -h t
? ?
s y V, 1
'
?f 1 a chc
Mr. 1
perf?
?
!? ly. whii
?
But society can
ure I g the ? ment
?Indi
'
? ?
.... ...
? ?
.
1 I aucl
-??
. 1
? *rark i
:
I
Prepai
Americana Should Learn Spanish
? CT
many ? t ?
... but 1
?
of the
lack .n the mi.
French, wl
? ?
? i?f diffei 1 nevei
tart in l
? ?? t .1 tl UM*
Dr. V, ill j im p. \\
? .. t exhausted 1
angua *e
r to get oui
l .??
: '
' -
'
: .
:
?. bave
leed.
MIDDLE WFifc'T B?NDNIS
it Fails t?? S???? Thai III Own T?
t?<rv h Also Open '.<> Invasios
.
t pi ker has re?
, tour ? the <
lnl.lli? \\ rsl lie r? ?"
I
, their 1
i| leal i'" iti'.n
all an to pr? paredi
Our naval <
? i. ? al . quipmeni
and to a lai ge
tent m ' ?? ! i" di ? ii'i o
1
fence of our unfo on the G
! . i the event of th? ; v
i . , ;
- i ,.
i I Stat?
tern i
... the < ?
eouId become I
i n n-jlh m i ?
on our
?
! |
. ?
? Long 1 ! Sound wo
natura
,
. ' '.. ? ! ?
at Halil ?
emoi
? . Seal ' ? !
the Philipi
? ?
?
-. ?
??? ? '
of which are | ? ??
the ? ? ' ? aci
?... i ? ? ?
a
realize 1 tion,
i
t? ? ?
\ V
'
Pt- : . h .
?
I
?
?
?
n the present
?
? | ?
prepan talk
I i
?
?
?
?
?
I
General Grant On Preparedness.
?
?
-
? r. I.e
?
?
.
the
? ?
the greatest
I
;
I
? ?
?
froi
nation, ? ! pre
'. I be)
FR1 IGE
- v : 1 ? -
Gardner's Speech.
To 1 Editor of The Ti
? ? ...
?.'???'?
?
pi
re 1 pro-i
?
ed at is 1 ? ?
li ri?an
?
:
. : ? :
ppos?
; and, il prov?
, ?
'
'
it i
I tO 1 :
?
!. un.i
?
the i ? . ? ?
throw of tyranny . .-. ?
n her policies ??? ; .\ } i.
I f Wk, Jan. 10, 1916.
"YOU'RE GUILTY NEXT, FERDY!"
"THE SPIRIT OF CONCORD"
A Re\ ised Interpretation by a Veteran of the Cuban (. Campaign V\ ho B< lieves
He Was Deluded?Hopes for the Dey When a <- hastened
Spirit Will Conquer Capitalism.
? . rial r.f January 22
tord" touch*
I , ..????.? ? ?
are to me, and
. ?
it
|8 Indeed
.
...
?- ? . ? ? . ?
human
it i
but that
I
?
m aiid
rit, I think, which animated
v, ?
' - - ?' ? j?itc a
-
? ?
.?
' Cube by I
? ?
land tu the
. -??? I v. .a taught that they
Host viv? :
.P i rited eulogy
?
A. -: r:!.c whleh you recall T,
?- ? ?neord com
another M
a Ci rd man a- :
? ' ? le me I
tare t I I was
? the i of human I
I .
? -> ?if whom you ti felt I
? ? :
liirn little ??'??? American Ifl I
III I
be ?lu- I ; ari-l.inn; forth I B
i ' ? rman village,
' it ' ? - father?
irrcat
? ? '? l? ir .
?
t a war for lit?
? S ??'??ar In ???
? ? fought T Did <
led by the light of a
lublimi I, but to ba mi I? '.3 of s
?
in later yeara have I com?? to answer
the qui ' BOttld be answered, be?
cause only recently have I bejjun to ander
. ?? .' r:.ic forces behind th.it
-. that ?re were coir.g out to
lbs, and we f<-lt breathed upon us the
of " ;r fathers, who freed the
man. and "f our gre it gi
fought t -"? the white men of this
But In n ? ? it forth
Ameri?
And a fee
upon to liberate the
? .. 1
?all t of Ami
? ?
I ? ' could 1 ?
'? ?
? r In those lays (us!
the irar how the great yi
I in our ear?. \\ ?
ember ? a great da Is even
called u:
u r 1 i ! -
I to ua
?
1 pui
?
r net
t of all we read v
....
?
1 that wi
' idd I "?.. And.
at]
take up 1
t '
? ?
?
'
i - ? - . \
'
I
?
-
Wall Street n-:
?
.
:
Thro rhout modern h ? v
re turn ed 1
. ?
?
' them dr< .
rival i
I
Vou hint thai
For a Will 1
: elds of i
- ?
? it they go 1 .?
? ?
? ?
'
i of 1
. |
' " ?
?
? ?
| n au
?
But possibly l'y tl it I i.
: '. have become ?
% h tel I to vol un t eei ? :
inel Room
?a ?: foresee that day of ei ? at? D?
thej already distrust the
American volunteer? I? tl
for universal militai - thi
tl ? -y may drag forth ? I un? il!
pts of Spain wer
! too, ' ??? n li thi
ral B? im? r and 1
' . .
? Spain thai
ii
.iwin Madrid, li It t'r..!'i \. i \
rlin and Pa . .
i I
I enough w? .
' ' . "Dii .1 for Th? .r Coun
?
and Murdered by <'.ip:
the i rid i
the ' ? ?'
I I
day v? hen th? t of t'oi
?
rcth?
?
? > Paria 1
, .
?.ml nut until then,
...
| fhtened MAN TALCOI 1.
??,.'" ! I, 1914
GUIDO BACCELLI
The Brilliant Oar er of ?a Great
p: . ician, Senal 18 bohr.
?
a -.
-
'
'
'
! cure.
'
\ ?
?
I
1
;
Ne? ? '
Dutch MUk for Oeraan 1
? -
??
mai
?
JkjjrTa?
I Pristol. Conn, Jan. 11 Wk\ ^^A