New-York tribune. [volume], January 26, 1916, Page 10, Image 10

About New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924

Image provided by: Library of Congress, Washington, DC

                
Nm ?lcnl. tribune
lirai t.. lj??t ?(he Truth: N? ? ??Kdiforla!.
?A.lt rrti.eina-nls.
?H?M>.|H\ .,\\t ?.,:*? ta IB1B
Os III a l 11
t S?-? 1 . . . . .....
eaaaai t?.% ? -
Bu'?.,t;: J N
M nSi-R-i v ? - Portai
of lit-?? .?? \ . ?,
Va' . ? R I 1 M
la.? a Sumla ?
1?. ? .?, ??
NI ?
a ,- V v 1X1) I
i> ? i ' ?? 1 il
v.a
>l VT?ST OM.1 v "N1 ?
?, .SI
,. -. a-?- ,-, ' '
HIT UM1 ?? "XM
??a. ?
???J * '
>/?-?? ?al > ? ...
?
Ye? ?-an purchs??c nier? hii'nl.??' m'.? ? ri t??-il
la? THE TU SE t ; ) -for
if iiajaattefartiea ?i*ee?lt? la .-.i<> rae? THF
TRUM SI gu?rante? ? ? ? '??"1
hark apt ? lape, n?> qalb?
bling. IV? "? ? - i "' "?'"> ,f ,t"' --d
?aerl.-. r .'. .-?? BM I
Did Mr. Wileons
mean ru .-t h?? the
question every A- lai t? .lay.
havinj? read ?the published summary of the
lato t com? .' fr?. m the Gennan
(.;. When, in " ? B of
, u .a ?? .'.-a'.. Mr. Wilson informed the
G<??? eat th.Ht hi-- : ?ition ?rould
*-.::?.: no word or ad" I n eau that it
WOllld r until i( ? Ive I
wat nay foi Wai
the principle that he set Out I -h in
the wor'. ? ? naive
ta n-.urder Al
\ > ' -? r
their graves nr ? ?
' ; ? ?nth ?re ha ed while
Mr. WUaon haa exchanged iwiththat
"fri.-.'.d'.y nation" which sent its submav
rincs forth to mur law,
human and divine. We have -seen the I
ie ir dead ? ightt r, -and
^? a have seen Germany's allii s take up the
killing under their fla^s. 1
this a.-cn.r.-.' dation '.hut wo havi
Arc- ?- to quote rate? in American
l.ves on the German be. they do
the price of :
hove that this American peop'e v.
. lurt Into th?' memor, '
their own ox foreign peoples the precedent
that the German offer in the Iusitania
taso ?rould inscribe? Is there nothing in
the world but money? la the whole Bum
and substance of national honor -and na?
tional safety guaranteed by the payment
of a fixed sum, a caah bonus for the massa?
cre of America:-. cltizenB? -Are the subma?
rine con.-- ture to be
warned :?
"Do not kill ? rily?
it coat
This is all tht I I German
money
has a condition mai ? which
aw are ah
m\ money for our dead under the actual or
Y attack
the British, The pi era?ent is
Germany
has ? for her
?Shy! ? enough ; In
r.ddi'. .ve American activity
?gsdnat her ??: ? m; t havi
m ranee that I hildren
i-he has murdered will, In return for cash,
ior bo much l?er head ? ? ? e mur?
dered, nerve lier 11 Gr?ai
Britain.
How shall American?- hert after face the
?tvorld if there I
cdent that we -Mil en ami chil
(ireri for moni
no oth.r protest than ? ?dent to ob?
taining gold for theii for ?their
-juries'' Mere than this, how will they
face the <?? idence that to
did ? sell our diplomacy to
the mur?: irsohes
the agent such a criminal country as
that which ir and burned
LOtaVVI
We are not t he Lusl
tania, and that ia undent We are to
a -.-?-il* the agrt ful ?re. ob?
tained by Brit by our
?iplmna. ; .
to po Uirough tl f assert?
ing a moral and diplomatic victory for a
policy which for ? ighl ? tha has
done nothing but - , arid utter
empty i i humiliating, but
tolerable But ia it ii to be
tndured, ?thai we should proclaim to the
tvorld 'hat at,;. murder \?
men, W?omeil find children, pi
prepared t?> ma
after ?
We told Gen
her t?> "strict accountal litj " I ?id that
m ea ? ility? We told
(iernia' ? "omit no
act to perform our sacred duty." 1 ol that
mean to ?gel '? ' -M] '?' We told Greal
Britain the Other day tha' ?re ? a?r?r!y ac?
cepted tl a '.i . of 'hampi ?ning the ?rights
g-f neutra'?- and of humanity. Did that
mean m<>n- n. -h?
If Mr. Wilson dot
thing saotngtoi A'., man honor, let him,
ut least i4?j(?t't the prsssnl German
offering money without disavowsl
s.'ini ? message to Coagrsaa asking
that body provide foi t?a*?? rammer
Mad indemnity of the heirs of those
were massacred upon the l.usitama.
IM pay fur our own dead Lst 01 An
money that i? nsodsd without lellini
OUT honor : ? t -. 11 shaming our dead by ti
th?. gold of the mon and the nation ?.
murdered them and without pretei
that thin is the complete settlement o
h i against Germany, Let us aba
. protests; M ni accspt the ti
that aro t'? be accepted, linee Mr. W
will iio nothing else; hut 1st us not
pound felony ami condone mnrder by
inp from the bloodltsinsd hand of
In a piece of money which he i
i arath.n for a hrutal rrlnii'.
dur non, women end children of
Lusitanis aro dead. So far M our
ornment is eonesrnsd they are forgo
Thoir fat?? has DSOOme a matter of no
corn to an administration eagerly loo
for tin? ndvnntapcs that :' nesdl foi
;?.! campaign. MForget the I
tania" hai become its watchword
even this Is moro tolerable than thai
should remember the L-usitanis ?
of revenue si .i recall the tragedy to
anee ..,-1 i I r liv?ss a hsndful of <
? ?Id.
[1 will be a ahamef il thing, i
r and disgrace Americans bej
any man now alive, if Mr. '
rmits tho Gem
? ? : monsy, I i1
else, to murilcr Amer?csn i, MP<
price" would then moan pence at M m
collected for those mur.lor.?.1.,
is what Mr. ?'? ??watt)
.
Gorman controversy. We law ?
'.nt it had como to in i ur Mexl
policy. Shall wo ask "Pancho" Villa
from his st4?alinps ..
prii'e for those murder?.?.! in Mexico? Si
? money from Germany, tho sn
money perhaps that has been wrnng ft
I elgiom; fhall wo take this
satisfy all claims of honor i
tion ?
too much to expect that Mr. Will
will ask more of Germany, but m the na
of all that America ha-? meant lince
began on Lexil "fi
Americans must ask him to reject the p
posai to accept a cash lettlen
brutal murder which is not disavowed ,-i
will not bo disavowed. Ho has trai
American honor in the mud; he ha-- than
and humiliated the Aii.it
anything In their history, but
;s this. He n
?.- dispraco of a precedent pr<
ing that Americans put dolls
** ill take mi iny inju
whal ! ?ven Woodrow Wil
I? h '? H", who ;
out to protect Ai ? ? ii lives, csi ? ?
turn with a handful of dollar- leavi
our dead behind.
The Meanini? of the Monroe Doctriri
ch we prinl ri snoth
column of this issue Mr. '
'? :-, \. .1., challenge. The Tr
nt "f January 15 lasi th
"the Monroe Doctrine binds u t" .-.
risii'ility t I European countries f
v rongs done in Mexico to their nal
? wo have told them that we shoil
regard it as an unfriendly act :f they s
tempt to exact n i llitary in*,
vention." Mr. Dulles -ays that the Mo
? ? Doctrine does not bind us to ;
any euch responsibility. Yet tho cas
which he cites do not bear out his conte
tion, tho later one- clear!;.- showing a DlUi
broader interpretation of the Monr
?? than that which be deduces from tl
??arlier on.
The pon t to m ep ii mi ; ! - that tl
Doctrine and the policies whii
result from i: are a natural growth. '1
say that the Doctrin?
what it infant in 1823 <>r in 1851 is I
overlook tho fact that it i?- a lii i- g dec?an
non, not a mummified ?me. The Doctrii
was unquestionably expanded in 1895 I
Mr. Cleveland and Mr. Olney. It hi
still further expanded by President R?
**elt ;?? ? Pi ? lenl Wilson. M i
th?? acquisition of tho Panama Canal Zon
and the building of the Panan a ? ..?.
) altered its applical
? ? the i f the < can an
'?.ich lie between mir
try and Panama.
Th?? i Ii ,?? i States does n ?t now fes
direct political intervention on the part o
?"< reign nations ,n this arni. We hsv
? i the itage at which European pow
? ? - would be tempted into another wil?
ich as plac? d Maximilian on th?
thn.no in Me. What be fea
political intervention masked under th?
t>f reparation for injuries to Euro
nail and resulting in tl ?
i. i'f riphts, privilege! and h.
lemi-public character. The Uni!
states Benate passed in 1912 a rcaolutioi
"riving warning against the occupation oi
possession of harboM On the Americar
conti: ? ?reign governments through
the medium of priv;.v ? rporationi and
association?. It is this sort of indirect
< which tho Monroe ' trine is now
?.days being enlarged to meet.
The last notr ?
rt reparation from an of?
fendii * I ' ' ' ry was the
\ :
Britain, Germany ai II This
.....
blockade." It ws political Intervention
under a milder name. Opinion In th.
I nit? ,i Btat i wai greatly exercissd bj
this experiment. Although the govern
i; eut formall) accepted the assurance ot
the blockading pot ei i that they were on!)
i ying tu colled Just debts and had n<
political ends In view, all the intbieiifo tit
tl:e administration was exerted to end the
blockade and bring about a resort to erbi
t. atioti.
The full histor) of the Venezuela block
nde has never been told. Onjj a couple of
\.Us ago Mr. Poindexter, of Washington,
Mad m tin? Senate a statement dealing
with the inside history of the Venezuela
it, according to which Presiden!
KooseveH had to threaten I i end the At
?',,'? \ ? ? uelan waters to raise
tha blockade before the German govern?
ment could be induced to consent to arbi?
tration,
Tin? United Statea went Into too i?omin j
? an Republic t.' .-? Iminiater the Dominican
riebt for the primary purpose of fore tall
nur action b) European powen t.> extort
gettlem? ? t ? aval d? monstrations.1
Even more pointed was President Wilaon'i
military occupation "f Haytl last summer.
which bad ns its main purpose t.. prevent
a foreign occupation of Mole St. Ni.-hulas
and other Haytian porte through eoncea
?ions which might be granted to European
creditors. Our present protect irate In
ts on much the sann, baeia.
i nited Sta i - hai shown repeatedly
? ?.,-. Iti determination ??> limit
ght of foreign nations
.:, the territory tributarj
Mexico li<'s in that
tion of 1912 w'ns
aimed pari ly al n ported Japanese
.. ?',),.,.. foothold ." M? ? eo's
l'a.-iti.- >?" ist i' lie, therefore, t.i say
that we all I ntirs free
lora ; atural redress fur w .?
lone ' ' all in Mexican territory.
\v. do not \"d if we do not, we mus?
?ation to protect
they can be pro
by our :' ? On the maii'iten
ance of ? ibility m Mexico. We
. | We cannot
? ? right of for?
?al re
? ?.. do what
? ..f our own might to pro
? ? ? property.
New York's Men for New York.
1 Mayoi can align this city's
? ion if. support of a defl
imms for the munici?
pality' have accomj
? . which he has
in\it?"'. ' ' th? matter with
of th? i r of Cora
ts' A
? I | them
that, then- i- no substantial differ?
the treat] t the city de
? -?!' all is there room for
tit- taxpayers
ess of
? "" 1. on which
? '
? ?
i solidly, r? arty affilia
? ?
within reason, prac
lically an) wanted from the
,
from the law
? lUgh, 1': :?
.?:'.'. It
fa ? ' ? ition of tax
funds to which New York tel : It
officials who
...
? 1 from 11; - ? ? . he a
? not
willing tu : . these t ? rato
? ' . ?
of th uch a fitfht
ai M? . will win fair treatment.
ti .? Ma.?sal a pi r
to meet
? Mr. Georgs von I.. Moyr
Mr Truxtun Besle have exchanj*??-! not-s
? ?'?:!,1"
Logwood for Dyes.
-, ' . < ,.
We are not I upon Brit?
I
Ci Irai A m er i f.i, Bnd, ? ? ?
'
to !"..k for "
o? log
? ?titln;- for ;. I .
'
'
?
. ?
Irai Ai ' re it
rnuner-l
l f..r
.. ht t..
stimuli
?
ei
"A Golden Nation."
!"?? n that be
No han
' Pi \> ??
' ' ? elves hav? ir name a mock*
We he ? down the faith our father
tan.
: md hope, * ?n be
Ight ;
psy for j much fbr
??
gold, in gold fetters
wrought
tl la?, '
N" e, no granite stand,
. r rate
? p
1 ' water or b) land
gton moulds t.. d cay,
^nddeadmei
I Al; ,
A NEW AMERICANISM
Tin? Lesson for This Country in the
World Wiir.
ii? Hi.? -Editer <?f Tha Tribeae
Sir: lienrrul Weed baa Mked, bas even
-bagged, f.T a ?.argel aad in?ttrr ?trjalpped
m my.
Pol a I'rmjiicnt who mini prraerve peace
ander all elrcuastaaeea eaa teald ,i??i pel
sibly Uiiii'k if m mo,o capable, patieat awl
paneveriag buib thaa Preeldeat tYileon, bal
i.? n pilot iiuiing an lateraatieaal erisis b? i.
un sbeolate fallare. I de not tlnnk Utal
i mint voti IliTiiHtuitf will ever !??? tin- : ? '???
?iu> uf -State, evea theoretleelly; hut It
.??iii? a? the-ogh tii? nseleoa aad wanton
ilanghter ?f AmeHcaa altlaeaa ea lb? bigh
.n? by Qenaaa an?l Austrian 1' ?boata will
continua until March 4, HOT. Tha ealj thing
?hit the Teatefl murderTS will reci/ni/e i?
pewer, SI a Ilirrat of power with BOBS? srtiial
force tieiniiil it.
ti,i- oaly nay are run nmedj ihrsr defect?
l? by preparedness. Tin- sonner wo h-nrn Hint
' millions for defence" is rh.'Hper tliMii "OBB
.i ni for tribute" the better Tha awakening
fad when it ia im? late will do m ne
?-?....I. deliberation is costly. It ia ncogniaed
un.i uadenteed that had a?? beeB prepare?! Ib
lug a ?'. If] i, n?' l.iiii'aii'ii, ?lable, Hea
?.n.n, Persia, Aurons arould bava beea i?imk
... tb their carga ai p>recioni livee.
As badly as we need an ad?quat? army, it
? imperativ? that ara bave a navy
quite capable ef defeadlng our ahoree; in
::irt. Admiral ?Dewey Baya thai 1' ahould be
t in noae." Wilson In tea yean nigl I
build ten dreadnonghte, submariaea, aeoat
and battle emisere, ate.; It, fact, our Preal
dent is j'.rt al?.nit beginning to think <?f 11 ?.?t.
?? t.| h Pre pi. Bl whe r.-in gira na
thi >? ten dreadnought? in two or I
i, man who can provida an army of BOOflOQ
or timro, if necessary, - ?. :i k 111 ?c
America ati srme?l ?-amp." m? ?-< 1 . ? | I
Bnyway, sra an> "tee proud to light
i.pla are nf th.? opinion I
.?..r-? Roosevelt, as President in such a time
i, might provi ?i experiment,
thai ha ii ?toe ?iuick te jump at eonclusiona,
.? war might !?.> hi." itabli But I ? ?
? i t.. i?? lu \ i? that there ari
crisis, nn.l only our ?sra
about how many of the?? ao-called
"dipli mat toriee" anr I
? -'in. It is true, odd
many <?f na h?v?? langl ???' at l ?
rell m id ???? bal ba has said, and > ???
? ar ? year latir \?.?? accepted the?,?'
lam? i ea. Hi? vie? i
an preperedneai Bnd I nal relationa
le ea ?rail m practical, Th? ? i
1 aid he in a i.n.-?
party eat We have i ; ?
prehen ..- "unwritten laa " ai
tn whether n man ahould accept a third terni
ai Preaideat if r naa can a, i ?
well ev< ? ? should hold m ciel
whether ho is our Chief Mag trata a
. in dred times. Our n> ?? I't? Id?
ha be Roosevelt, Hughes or another,
?i real stronir man, ?'? ia it. aceordsnea
?pounded bj ? ? G ?eel, a
man who can de deliberately a;..I well ?hut
taki . Wll ?ofl to at yean m think
If t! .?-..rM \?ur ,-au ii.
-.. fur as w? art? concerned, II ought
?'?-. ui a ieeaoa, ami from that 1?
i Be a " Nee -Vrai
? |
I heva d ?agreed with tl
Tribun? many times, a? la onlj ?
now I cannot <lo ? ?. and I
than! 1 lit? 'l ribun? for ill <
intelligi nt edit
.1 l DWARD LUMBARD.JR.
New York, Jan 23, 1 US.
Connecticut's Deer Slaughter.
l ?. tei ef Th?
I havi befen m? a
edition of "The Danbu
Mews," undi ? .
. | ., .....
Deei K .'? i Wholesale Slaugl tei ? \
mais in Stiit?. Bine? Aogui ? " I
ar.' Bppart , t by
tha ?Stete I h ei t?i a Coi
n. ?".'i may then!
\ l v. rite l bava Bot thi teat data ai
? - ?? ? I ?f th? ..f the
? itatea f??r 1915, eom eted t Ocl
20, 1911, fa .... -; simi
it'? in anj
? ? ther I ? ?
In a
" i? allowed.
? ?
Th?- Connecticut act dot
that di
?? hy them to ,,'rou ?ne
? ?. ? ? .
.?r taken.
ego t lenta of tha
- -? foi tha " ? member of his
." maj i"' eon?! rued to include non
reiidents. It specifii >ng a
shotpun Is to he need. Me sportsman thinks
of hunting such gama si deei with a ahoi
Run. The use of shotguns tncr<';is<>8 the
number of animals who are wounded ?ti'i
. perhaps to die a lit g?
event which i? deplored by ?verj ?
man. It specifies all buck? an?i both fawns
and does as lawful subjects i?r slaughter at
? me. This is quit he bet
generally i
In Ne? Bi ni ia lek i
. . ? [njurt raps,
wounds, k;M? or destroys" i ? ???? ?-r calf
or caribou I ?
,i male
animal as B calf until he three
old snd baa at least threi
? | .m ?? ur lache? long
an?l caribou have I lernul
value a? "trophies" ths rer in
rattvely more plentiful. Bl the Bam?
genet d principle should ba
killing of i!ei?r.
The Connecticut set allowl " I ire" hy
anj meaaa eseept a "trup, man or di
her this includes ths lasso oi he bolai
? .-? ? iie a matter foi But
? ntly leave s loophole when
? .? i an don a by dog? on? ?
est of obsolete h :
er indefenal a method, i
parently be employ?-?! when feai I
the report of the killing or "capture"
?" be mail?? to s tfarr.e werde i. .
other local official. 1. .- to ? I I
and (i.ime Comm in or I nm-.i?
n ? 1 p r ?. ? ? m >. ' .
b?? doue within twenty four hours,
laa provides; Hid fn
weald no. he doi failure
?o report peaaltiei ar
? ? ? ? . an ebviena.
I have al
... ad effect IJ?tll the p -
-t protection WBI
;?. deer to June I, 1917. It.?' act wa?
I, ati'l "wholesale slaughtei
Dr. Hornaday aad ethei
... -, to lastrad our legialati ri
<;. s BRI ??N.
Bri . ki sld Centra, Conn?, Jan. ti. I ?
What Is Going On
loi ?' Tha Trlb
!.. ..,-.
of the running of the MH hat Is G
ilumn Sunday. S
auld othei wise I me, it
!? fact, :?? !??
?iiat ma |, 1er of Thi
r it in a train c
to businesi i ? I. I i tl
JOHN I-. Uli.
i erk, J?i,\. 17, 1916,
PAID IN FULL.
OUR RESPONSIBILITY IN THE AMERICAS
Wli.it the Monroe Doctrine and the Precedents Established Under It Bind
Ui to Do in Respect of Protecting C itizena of European
COuntries?A Dissenter.
i ribune.
i ..... r ri bon? h n ferring oditorlally
to the M ; ,. ;.. ? Its issue of Jan?
uary 15, u following wordsl "The
trina binds us t.. assum?? raspea
ttbilit) eountries for wrong??
. it- snala, since we
them that wa ihon .1 !.-;rnr.l it as
lly act if they attempted to exact
n ditsry iat? ?
. mbodied In 1 itatament a pop*
of th? Monroe Do?ctrine whleh
nee with 'he oflleial peaitioa of the
? t j affected
?? ah? fan a- tatement of
i notl ..- which
e_tion to : t the Inter
powers in
. - Ii- laid down the
prineip e that "the v.rican continents
? ? lared as sub
t for future ?
. er an)
?
: ? ? danger
to our peac? I I ?
The United Stal guarant?
tical an.I territorial integrity of
the Ai ? under Monroe nor ai
- ?? time bai II itood between an
American and a E?uropi ? er when ?as
?.?is had agi ' ' former,
? the only way in which that grievance
could I Involved the permanent
seizure of American territory or a change
In the form of an American government.
Even Pm ident Roosevelt, who ga.e the lion?
roe I trine th? broadeal possible laterpre
"an aggrieved nation
ran without interfering with the Monroe Doc
tion it sees At in tho ad
? ??? lisputei with Am?
provided that action (?m ? ?
of interference with the tonn of
of the d< ipoilmenl of then
and. again, Mwe
? guai snt? against punish
? rovided that
not take the form of the
tory by any non-Anier
Aii "
! iropean powers
? ? els ms against American
. I by mes -ares of fores are
numere - il Britain blockaded Nitrar?
1842 end again la 1844. and Salvador
iter thai iam? power
v Brasilien vei ?
made wai on the
tl
I V slpai..." At that
time .-? ? ' Seward me I? th? itement
would no
i.sa snd Ai
? - srs "i' i-he.l to ti.e pol il
?
Great Britain,
nd Italy I ? ho coast ? I
irla I - - i ?
" ised to latisf at tha
tmbaass 1er took ps - te
Hsj "that ander i o e.r
oui
.....
? ? rritoi )." TI i di
? ? ni ted Btatei
ami no wai nada to I
? '.a.
lates has not
re of the Lai n Ai
Kuroi ?..-.
equati
? ich would ? id to i
territorj When in
ta te i ich measures
itisfaetion, than the
lered I ? ?? ?. lei
inda of
? ?? . ? e? bjeeted
isurei
prevent |
Santo -?hi result
on, the !'? tl : H it?
r the cuaU>mi in
.. rs ? itisfy 1
?- ? ? lbs action wimh wa?
1 recently taken In Ha; |!ftme
tinture.
It is, however, only in estreord
. ?inwers bav? ? ? reed to i ici
? ?
to sat. ? ? In all ?
--.i'., es the right
: .'wa-r-t have be?
by dipt? tion, or. f.v
of re[.r en by wai
I'h'? Unite I States has nev?
?
...
?
such liabi ? ? ? '
n.e ?... rers sr? free I -
nary measur. - of protection
ami even the extraordinary mea- .
. ? , the V?
la) to protect I
them In th? Ml these |
: ., entat vi
that thi ' .
i rded.
When ta g
?ituation, la? l.e.-n i" .. posit on to r?
tance to I
poa era it has .?one s... In ...
mtrdiary between Urea' Britai "
g Benton, the 1
?veil any res| ? '
tion. It - ..i" on in tl i not bo is ?
on sn obligation wn Monroe
no it was fore? ;me, but on
the prim?.pie of bumanitj and th?
? ? ons.
The e.litoria! statement I libune
might well be chs ng?
:.?> doei N( IT bind t?:- I wxes to
assume responsibility to foreign powers for
irrongi dSns Mexico to their nstionsli
have we specifically toltl the powers that w-e
-hould regard it as an unfriendly act if they
attempted to exact redreaa hv military inter
rentlon." ALLEN W. DULLES.
Princeton, N. J., Jan 18, 1914
For a Federalised Nations] Guard.
To the Editor of The Tribune.
Sii : I read n th ii
that the opposition to the pro|
riental army by the national guard ti ? :
und that its effect
In my opinion, no plan t'..r an ?ncrc
our defensive force will be s auccesa unlesi
II pro* ides for eomp il military s?
I think the failure -if a rol inteei
been proved in the case of England, ami 1
might add in this country i
days.
! believe that the i I ?houl.i
i.e need as the foundation upon which to
build an adequate srmj !?
i bow in? '' the g tard may be,
''"-re r> .'? ?? orgai .' ...
these orgai
tune la the eres ut?
.. guan? sa 1 ! tdersl
ized. Al present : i arly every il il
(feront military law, and while the | ..?
are all ?rork
; re working Iferenl nea
The national guard ?n raost ?..'
combed a ?th p< tili< i, and mei ..?? i
obi . by politi? i 11
I i." much hard? r I i ac? ompliah .
Peder?
ss a national force the n ? n ??. luid all i
.?
would be i erj popular with
if the guard, arid ..(?;
i cine from '
the Garrison plan .. c , the few who have
|l .. to h if
through politics . ' ma and ere
afraid of losing their ? d the thing??
a hich go a ith thai '
est thai a brigadier gen?
was to be mad.' in thia itate, "to i
with the an "I do
call at. the present time an
?'i.ti'.? the I ni ted
nrrny. IrVhi
"i more ago, I git t i.
? ?
ition, then
regimi nt of i igi neei i in l esl ib
lishmt nt "< 01 - .
' W. it HOTCHKIN.
New \..th. Jaa IT, I91S.
GENERAL UPTON"S WORK
There Exists No Better Author.tr
on Our Military Needs.
' ? '
? .?-? ?
?I to tie
I -.'.on oo th.i
In vain
tonal columns for at ll "".?a. "
whom the gr N'" ?'
?
'j pene?
t the |
- ?
?
'
utstoa
i '?
M ?, ??'
of the arm;. Wai ? K0<,t- wk;
.'.ar, see
that
? beak, 1*
tales," k*T'
*
? ?**? '
which I
??h !i ?*
r ar.d m
again, ; r our a:..
tary historj 1 ' '' ? '''"','".
? .von'i ,'cc-'
tinental army " A ? ir'cr#,'!!,'
? tattfow
t-ed in ?? -
? rt''' '
leant, J*
"' *
o: 1812 Thia
?
..; ./oui
'
'
Befulate Gasolene Pnces
i i
t
and th?
-
?
?
u shut**
?
?
, . ? ?
SolH i '
?
. .ft ?*
??
tence, with th? u ***
.id
o
| Ii*''
pr ee
Sum York, Jaa. 19, :