New-York tribune. [volume], March 29, 1916, Page 10, Image 10

About New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924

Image provided by: Library of Congress, Washington, DC

                
IVru) Dork ?ritam*
Hr?t to l.3?t?tli? I ruth: Ne??s?l.ditorial??
".daertUements.
? ll?M.?l?M . M MM II ."? 191".
?r ? . - ? .=
,-wt,. | ? | -. - . 4 , a
? v ?
I?/*-f**l. ? ' *"? "
A ? - I .1 BUM 1
K'.r-??, Si* I
StT*?r-TiIrTT ? ' ? ' ? T ??!-? I?' S B '?
rr <'r?? ?
f??!l? A ? ! '
.
? ? S .4
Bat.'1!,
rom MB r. .-?.-??
T)AII 4 ? AT T'AI'
o . - - I
0-e j'?
?II * ' a
- . .1
Ora r??
? OM.1 A
o?? uttnk - ? '
? -.? . 0??? rar. LM
"ftUr*?4 a? th? r-*-*?*** ? a- I ? i'irt u tteett r.ua
? , ??
Voo ran purchase merrhandl?? ad?erti*e?I
In THE TR1B1 NE *?Hh absolute eafety?for
If dissatisfaction resalte In any ra?e IHK
TRIBl'NL guarani?'? * ??? paj your money hi k
?pon Tt-tiu??!. Nu rod tape. bo sjalbbllag. We
Brake -*o*od prompt l> If I he advertiser doe? not.
The Real Danger on the Border.
The logic of th?> President's recent wani*
ing againct "traffickers in fa!rehoo?i" along
the Mexican border in thoroughly Wilson
Inn. In order t?? excuse himself fi
taking ri'.-i?"?.-il > prccaatlon? for the
aafety of the expedition ?ent into Mexico
and for tl - rder tcrwns,
Mr. Wilson .?"? l-rmna certain un
ki'"*\ii pen ? : rumor?!
which tend to m.il.e tlie .?'tuatioii of G?en
?tral Pcr*h:t ig*l forces and of the A monear,
immunities along the Mexican boundary
?till more precarious.
It j? a dastardly thin*; to circulate false
reports (f'?r Mexican consumption) of the
intentions ?if the 1'sited States govern?
ment toward Ml cico ? r fal C reports (for!
American consumption) of the ciisnfTci
tit'ti ami treachery o? ' arran/.a troop-, now
entra?*??! h h? ping General Pcrshing to
hunt down Villa. But with the situation
as it is on the '.' 'der the spread?
ing of ? i t" a large ?
merely the outgrowth of a general and
genuine feeling* "f alarm. The true peril
lies in the situation, not m the circulation
of false new I about it. The "trafli?- in
falsehood'* of which the Presiden'
plains ir. nol ti i " the trouble 81 ?1
danger which are imminent on the fron?
tirr; it i- mly an effect and a symptom.
W . ? | i -i nut in them elves, omi
. they could hardly he made so by
statement? in one <<ay's news which the
next day"? news show*? t.. ha' e been impu?
dent fabricar:'
The fundamental farts of danger on our
?ido of Lie bonier and chaos on th?
can side eanno? he brushed away hy abUBC
of thore who originatg and spread alarm?
ing ramors. Hera, as everywhere else, Mr.
Wil.-on's logic u m a vacuum. 1*"
words were never t>> result in deeds, if all
a government had to do was to split argu?
mentative hair- ami merely try to fix
moral t? ? ;lity on the various factors,
contrihutin?* to an o\ ? 1 and dangcrou.
situatiot,, ? dent's warring might
be welcomed as a t; l ful Bild helpful docu
4V*Ben-'
But we are li\ mg in a world in which the
need of faci'ij- the consequences of crimes.
blunders and malicious misrepresentations
takes precedence of the need of fixing th*?
degrees o? Mame therefor. It will not
solace Americans on the border with their
lives and j ropi rty ? ? . it will not
remove Um ?American honor which
would come from a iua*saerc of part or all
of our tiny expeditionary forces in Mex
ico?to he told that the blame fur a Mexi?
can OuUireal , catching U? unprepared,
mubt rest with unnamed pe rho have
been put'.: . ?' . circulation
through the vai
No matter tiow who caused the unrest
on bofj :ary line, \<.h'i il
tu blame fi?r Villa'i attar?, on ?Columbua
or who is inciting the Mexicans to an up?
rising against the hated gringos, the Ad
ministration must face the l'art that our
military torct on the Mexican boundary
?8 at prrr-ent insufficient and that the peo?
ple of our border states arc not at p
secure. The Administration should look
ahead, not behind. It should err, when it
errs, not on the side of Inaction, but on the
side of art ion.
The national guard is reeded on the
Mexican lina to reinforce our und.
mobile army. '. ? u.g furl!;. ?
further so ith, of communiera?
? ?kt the Pershing expeditioi ai
stretched nearly to the b**-*raking point.
'I here I g ?o far in Mex?
ico be* "ri-an troops a? d the ( ar*
ranza for ? , B ' If ha - Villa
?*ontir .
gcr, ?H .y that the ?. condi*
tions of c n - ? . ?, will con?
tinue?
The Unit? g too much
on a single dar,?,- plant
?"' wotig arid disa ter happei . ?in ?
be prepared to face the worst. Our mobile
army aat been drawn .,,,.,? ,..,,.j ,..
cally no availabl? reinfoi -,- i,-ff.
The national guard it our only r?
if we are to motril!? e-rtougb n ? n oa the
Mexican border f?,r i? < ? .? ?
The country will applaud ?h- I'r ??v,,?,.r,t
in chasing down the false rumorm
who are stirring op bad I
? I I" nil ? B It that I? a
The r? -,. ?,, ..
military position in the dang
guard i
faith and
crusty and oversensitive stickler for int
i! punctilio like General (Jarran
We could all disregard the fabrications
the rumormongers if we knew that it m
beyond their power to do us harm. A
?-?.? cari put it beyond their power only
g a sufficient force of regulars a
state troops on the border until the oh je?
o? the punitive expedition are attaine?!.
End the "Barnes Issu?."
An effort, not I
cover, is being made to pledge th?' can
for delegata from I
Republican National Convention ?to **i
to reelect Mr. William Harne.* a memL
of the national committee. That mo\
ment should not succeed. Nothing COtfi
he more disastrous for the Republic
party than to have it succeed.
Mr. Harnes stands, not only in this sta
out in the nation, as the preeminent repi
re of all that th? young and vigi
ment in the party v..! I
hind it. He puts the marhine before mi
II? put? party before patriotism. He pv
I.* fore public interest. The bal
of 1912 still clings to him. To give him.
tins year of all years, B position in t
body which must conduct the campan;
would ? ? lit the public that the II
publican party had not ?.-one beyond HU
1 ,*er\e notice on all who left t!
party then, and on all the young vote
ccme of age since, who hold \"ith the
older ??lies who left, that the Republic;
? the place for them.
All of thi.-- Mr. Pames verily believi
Hoi willing to fight for hi? belief? now i
he wa? then, and his beliefs are the r-am
entitled to them, hut The Tribu?
carne:-' thai the Republican N
tional (dmiinttee, in the coming campait*
is not the place for their expression. II
? 'err ?oil to that. I Id only be I
embarrassment to any candidate the coi
vention could choose, if it chose
to select a winner. Hi? election woui
have a most unfortunate effect on the can
paign in this state, where Mr, Bamc hi
inen under fire personally as well as p<
litically.
Tie Republican party cannot afford t
be hidebound and reactionary. It cannt
afford to offend liberal-minded, pro?.-"
voter*, whether the "progressive" I .
with large or small "P." 11 cannot affbr
to mi chief campaign issues th
? "ii of interpreting party rules an
Bamc ' well known opinions on th
.1 he part] ' nui
be far more modern; the party's platfon
must be far more vital.
Mr. Barm , wisely enough, has refuse
to be a del?gate to the convention. Ih
ervice he could do for his part
would be to leave Chicago as si on as th
linary routine business of the out
going national committee is. concluded. Th
Parties issue must be removed from thi
campaign. It could be i
expeditious and generally satisfactor
fashion.
The Tenderloin Defeated.
The refusal of the Ass-embly I
mittee to r?'port. the so-called "unde"rworli
bills" practically kills thai vicious legisla
tion. 1? means that ihr Poli?*? Depart
ment will not be deprived of the most el
fectual means yet disewered for drhim
disord? rly hotels, danc
halls and kindred u- dl I' mean
that the I.egi-latur?' i not ye! ?rilling t>
to run, or to regulate, th?' N'ev
Yorh City police, and that the lawmaker
have full i 'hat the courts wouli
intervene to do justice i?i case the :
being human, happen to make a mi*tak'
in their handling of a given situation.
There n .-t 1" general n*j??*ot tl I
Ni erson of this ?
pporl h legislation. 1
? thai hi vote a ? pi? i ing t<
the "Tenderloin element" in hi? distriei
hut it inevitably must have been far fron
?y to th" church element, th?
home clement all th?* other dementi
which n ake up the bull: of the ? i ?? -:,'.
lifflcult to believe thai the Republicai
. there, taking that vote int?
? aid ?"- cr support him foi
r? nomination and reelection. A- uredlj
OUld not.
Our Aviators in Mexico.
[? is really extraordinary how man.
military h o? are being provided in oui
tiny campaign after a Mexican bandit
curse, there are a great many ;
who could have foretold, and "me wiv
oretell, th?' difficulties and di?appomt
meut- which our unpreparo'ir'o- i.-,
i. Tin? delay in taking up the pur
rom < . the lack of men, o:
of transportation facilities am
now of .-erviceahle aeroplane*, are all ;
part of the picture which our Cassandrai
dr?'W, to the profound irritation of BUcl
telling
make no further provision. Now, thes?
thin; '? '? Z'-r prophecies, but fact.
staring *i country in the face
about tin
' P.? ? - ha? announced that o?
?nes originally availabli
for service witl
dition two alone remain in commit ?on.
Two ? ; and four have
lent " h hi : them
'I he War I?. partaient
? : . ?.-. m ' v niai hin? before it can
? (net with mi*
though General Pc?
of aeroplane : both i ahead
of hi and a dispatch hearer: to
I ' I '.'her word-, ?lue to a I
ful and Inefficient management of the
OUT arn,y a:.?i to the |
. thi*- all-important arm of the
-m warfare baa prac
p ad m i' ? ? ? ?, ?
? i.'.e the ob
' ' "? High .?;-i
di '.??..?' an! :, ,
I big a' prill,)..,,*
?tion as I ?i.,,,1 ?f hlJ
i ' ?he ?? obstacl?
Bust k
*.cen. Have the :' ? ai 'ho border !
asleep for five year ?'.' Or '.:-. the im
ity to get a hearing finally ??.
all their attempt I
uation'.'
The army aviator?
not powerful enc - I ipport pilot,
server and sufficient fuel for
flight at the altitudes which t!
country calls for; that they -hould I
machines equipped as are 1
the military aviai i f Europe who
above ' ' : "'?
plied with ?uch s
haven't enough
?1er in thi
there to form the reserve which m
now come in -o ban
But every 01
to the ?? The House of Be]
sentatisc la now hurryfa .
own dereliction in the matter by pas?
a deficiency bill providing for I
chase of eighl high-powered aeroplane*
twenty-four, "if
should be only a beginning,
be thankful for small favor?, while in!
ing that never again shall we be can
thus help:'
Scarlet Fever.
? own pathologi I of B?
a new bacillus believed to he the cause
scarlatina, if il guilt 1 as been esl
, m : a ?th . th? discovery is
manife.-t importance and may Ik* the ti
*t?p toward the control of a highly 0
tagious and very prevalenl
Scarlatina wai formerly ipposed to
most readily communicated in the la
during the period
desquamation, but this is generally don
ed to-day, and it has long been suspect
that th<- sec: ? the nos? mouth a
respiratory trad were the chief mediums
spreading the contagion. The fact that
all probability it | mosl readily trai
mitted in the ear:.
for the difficulty of preventii g '?'
He? ce, if an effect. e vaccine could
found ?1 would pr' v? of in? itimable valt
. |y, as the discover?
ing nurses immune.
As In all ca es of thi kind, ?1 will
make too much of the dii cove
before more i known of it. 'I;
r rer's own ? ' exemplary
point of reticence an?) it v. .
to it dulge m -in
of the . ind similar
may be that ei*"h1
year ago ? bacteriologist ? ??
? .*.) th?* micro-organ! i
for irlel er : iced son
thing resembling the affect ??
? evert irly well establish
in tin event thai he had in reality be
? ?with ?'reptoc'""!. which Bl
? .?it, and were indeed up|
Bom? to be i ufflc enl to b? counl for the <li
? ?cus serum? ha1
employed in lhe trea
menl of the di ? >m?*-?mes, it
believed, with BUCce , bul ob* tl
proi es nothii ight be
?
infection. The di '?'">' '
1 ? of a vi ry gencri
of pro?.
roan orirrin. s belief, by ihe way, whi?
was surety | ted by tl
discoverer h i i illu trotad a il
that ?-ame under hi? observation.
The Reformed Blueberry.
- ; ion n
There arc er the su
\? ? In the pin?
rem of Sen ' govert
.-. bill?
berrie as large aa I i .? ?
? >f a flavt
.
? I
of Nea
ture, i
ia well s
\ai'ir.
'
?" prom
? ? ??"! lands ?
tha? ? ? ing ' with Mr ?
for Ihr i'.
it i i ? Wai the
, ? ,* ? i
?
' ireh, with resull
Itiona
? ?
' ' '
will pmvo an Bi of liijf,?
tance to \>?a- England agriculture, ?
i dding to the
t.-.blr. And 'he txper menl
r.oraic
gieat .?; r?*'rh?? ? .
but a
chenieal needs of hlu
A Business Opportunity
To the Kditor of The Tribu?
rha Frencl
recognising tha? termination o
th?* war an lmmrnar nmi .. BStniC
j tion will have tu In- undertaken to :
' the railways? i
. manufacl iring
i prior ?." ?
? ?
j the le
not be shir to ] money i squire?
? ?
? ?
\ ? ?? i o ? |
g the war I
... prf.
'
which
ican industrii , ?
in m .
? .
ble, woald ? tai
?such article? a? t; ? ..lue*-.
rha French and Belgian i-ovrrnment.? ar??
preparing - ing tot ?nforma
?
tricta affect ar, which li I
lion, it :? stated, will he available in a n.in
.. .
a of
portm ea, not anc al aapeel
aa a m<
? lea of American manu
I "f ?*?...;
iced in tl
UEORGE HILLARD BENJAMIN.
i ;??* York, Harch 23, Itlt,
EUROPEAN FEDERATIC
A Plan Founded on a Bas
Nationality.
? i.i 'or of The Tr.bur.?
Among the papers left by
. In the Victor U-^go Museum,
? dc Voge?, Paria, is one prop':
a union of Euro* - ' tw?ati?
rel "The 1
of a Crime." d-'cribir.-; the Frar*.co-P
War of 1<J70, hs speaks of "a bl-nd
- || *.?..?? There bas also 1
' *
pa since tl -'"??"?
f thi
? I monsrch;. r | ?very tende
ge, race, prejudice and custom?.
The bast 1 ? for a union ?
eocntriea ia Bat! Ob
? e ne intrusion of territorial ami
llagu
?
;? .._;-.,-- ll - A
of 1! . ling to nationalil
? .
? , " ..*
:t federation in '"- *"'?''. but
have ?<
I \
.i i i :? ??? pa Uial
. la alao I
i then
. | :p on geographical une? ?
ar.d with cn?npi
would ?lo away with nihilist
,-il discontent Europe will
having Cenatant
? ?? hardanclle? free and 81
woi.:d he of more ralue
i
urmor.
ti of ? al Eui
Pol ? ii. Bohemia. Hangai* .
Bulgar a, Greece end Serbia, ?<
' a? )? eh are Slavonic in rare, n
popuhr -", of 75*MW,00)~
\ fe Icral ? I '?'? < terfl Kurope ?
France, Belgium, Spn;n. Por
ami Italy: Latin in race sad laaguag?
i ne in rel:/ | a population of
firnl.oon.
The federaron cf Teutonic, o- ' -
Europe would I"* romp?.?oil of Au
South German ?ti U i,
Pre i ;.. Sa ?i . Hai ??? < r, Dcbi
. and Bweden, with ? poj
D0.OO0 ? -?tonic in rare and lang
t\ith . ' one m re!if?ion.
\\e now corns to Britain v. th imp
federation; England, Ireland, ?Seal
\'i tralla n-id south Af
all ind? . ? o ? ? states, ?' tl * ?
, .- i i,i ... : opulatio
: irope v ere formed in'o th?? abo"??
, take the piar? 8
aa represented to
M there w
eh anee for 1 I
?
opte rule shall w? be assure?! ? I I
? ;?r. The per?
? a.i I ng h apt
.tl! become federated, With their i
?ton. V i LIOTT LYNi
?? rch 23, U?l?.
Metropolitan Tickets.
? -
- ..".i and Mr. Clinta
? ? our frank <spoaur? of ?he ti?
?? ? ? ?pen lb
? ng' Tribune.
'? he a New Yorker or
? known tl il thi bal any and di
cirele m the Metropolit t be |
cured from th* lo\? brewed '
od of the op?
,.? .1 a- rby, ? he'her he
? |
r, h il hare ion?? ii
ng the ?per?
l i.d ? ? ? .. ripl
.* | e ri'.e hi?. Kor favorite p?rfoi
?mees the Rpeculators demand any1 g |
>.' ??? $10 i'?ir th? balcony ..
k you can get one
? i office wh? - - '
ll'iva- ? e known public spirit j
lit i M ? I,,
i lion go on baa 1
terj te me as.! a ? eore of
' ? ends. And to think tl
"he pe?
to p? . n a l" ?
'
o. ?ha? r?. f -
lid ia aa intei ? ? it I
? ? : . beeaaae raan't aIwa
Perhaps 'f fh?*y Installed ai off!
ts .i efficiency a
dealing they would ?.">e ?he public
:. pal ron of theii h titui
and I'lenr the environment of the ?.ernv.n th
? ORMAN n IN I ER.
"i ork, March 21, 191?**,
Thank Heaven for One!
e I- ditor of The Tribu? i
v? ben one ?
? ! on the aditoi al page
ning it view * on ?. an..
the day; when ?
. ' be this number published coi
: with tho?*e of the.r kindred
- of ?pace and th? laws of "
va.. -
' . . . ,
ist meal ! be
marshal??
are no)
?icr.s further ho
tl rved,
rj he soo*
?? atara of tl i
can meet in the humh ? of on
least with Bathing but approbi
: tion.
Whether pro-German. pro-Knt-i ??h, pre
panes
ilfle pro-Anierieat
. ... ? afford
masquent ; ?
.
ar haw
what? ? ? . ? : ? ?rial comment ma] bl
? ??'??.ays one brght spot in The Trib
\? \ p
Match 20, : ?
Milk for New York Babies.
I
'? ? ? ? i read a pi it
? ? German and
Europe a:. :
?. wc have , . .
???r the bal. ? |
? ii ? ? In sumn ?
? ? ' '. and it
: ??" the ?
need.
r |
h parts of the eitw t., those *ho
'?"?*? Dial kitchen As
il on. This ..
tea
? ' r young in*
Diel Kit? hi i \
???!?? \ . iry No. 1
?1 th? Vaaderbi? Hi I
? ning, Mai
a
the prtaidtnt, Mrs i M
'" " ? ! I ??-' I ifty elghtl treat, al three
dollai IS) each. I RANI ; DEA -
' Ken Uli?, ilarch Id, Ific,
SHALL IT BE ROOSEVELT OR HUGHES)
A Correspondent Who Thinks That the "So-Called Hughes Boom" Is Being Manipulated by the Politic"
to Kill Off Roosevelt, the People's Choice?The Fortunes of the Republican Party
Are Deeply Involved in the Choice of the Candidate.
. toi of 1 h? Tribune
Sir: There are many people r.owadsv
picking up The Tribune of a "BOraing with ?
reeling of comfort. It undoubtedly has it
? . but on the whole it ring
true and probably in the most enlightenin,
ai 1 s' the fame time genuinely red blooded
broad American paper in the country. Tl
': by the narrow
?y or bigotry of oth?r r-'.v'papers th<
policy of your paper conies as a great relief
We have become almost rer-igned to the fat?
of never seeing our thoughts in print. Bul
your paper comes refreshingly to the rescue
Might I aak you. in view of your policy ol
being entirely open and above-board, to in
gat? thi? so-called Hughes boom? 1
notice that ?ture it ? great .:?
al this boom is tictitious.
Your correspondent; keep informing your
readers that people are coming out for
Hughe? every day. Hut I notice that only
the politicians are interviewed. Politicians
are no) [.copie.
It d ' llect to ar
. ? the eoBel laion that the Republican
politicians a!', over the ou:.try have been
ted from headquartera to resort to
conjuring up th - great
. enveloping
the country in a wave i ?? thu tarn for
? ? ' name had
ned four years ago at a session
? ' Voi l nbei a' ? ommerce the
ipeakcr would have been n irdered on the
Yesterday, a' ? of the New
York Chamber of Commerce, the mention of
Theod- : alt by Mr. Cheat? was met
by a roar of approval. Vet the Republican
politicians would have us believe that Roose
velt is running a poor second to Hughe* .
Roosevelt .*tron**hold.*.
Some time ago your paper frankly state?
a preference lor Hughes, but p?it i'orwan
Roosevelt as possibly available for th? Re
publi??BB nomination, asking the question
"Do they want Roosevelt?" The answer :
plainly written even on the rocks at eountl*.
roads:des. "We want Roosevelt."
who have voted r him
i dialike h'.m BOO want him.
have heard this from other part?
country. I have had people tell ?
personally. I have read receatl) lettl
your paper by people who though statins
their dielike far Roosevelt now- d?niant.
RooaeVi
I imagine that the b:g 'natu-.al 1:Il
of the country are reaiiy to turn to Rooae
v rl*. w:?,h open arms after the horror oi
\Vil*on and hia Administration. I will no:
rentui a a gu aa to a hat 1er thi ' -
cial intereat? prefer Hughes to Roosevelt.
Hut it is not at all unlikely that the Re?
publican bosse? have promised the bit: m
tcrests that they will deiner a Republican
administration March 4, 1017.
The Tribut.e has a very excusable lean ng
toward Hughes. H? would undoubted?*
:? great statesman if he desired to take up
such work. He i? absolut?
penden:, unboaaed \ G< of f*?e?
York ? vo. Hut
liked it. !'?? . : to e cape ?
to get on 'he bench. He i ' tt**d for the
bench, tie doei t to leave it. It i
a bad thing to nir? the Supreme Court of
tho United States up I politics. Huches
has been buried on the bench. Th? peopl?
neither know him nor his view.
But Barne?, Penrose and the other Repub
liean bosses hate Rooaevell rhe
of the Republican organization, aven if the
well known bosses retire to the background.
I -o i,.'a. Roosevelt'.' fr.? p':?.
[g to work up an imaginary sentiment fa
??red only by politici??-;, ,^
line delegates up solidly, unanimously ^
hiad a Hughes boom. I'onfronted with
unanimous nomination Hughes, ii u ttt
(umed by the politicians, ?ill accent. -, ?
toted bj them ia ? : doubt ???,
much if tb?J have : ? ,j,t ,?..?.
Hugh? st far. *-?,,
leai th??
to a-orral tk?
? ?? Republican ?icleg-?tt, *,,
Hughe? ?Bd then at the la?t moment -.?m.
them over to some inoffensive cand'tl?*.,
ting upon the disgust with the Dene
eratle Adm to carry him in.
The ?actual situation * tl I country
' exteraal ?n<i i?.
1 ' ' I"?* not
of ordin?r) I - r? per.en??
We mu*: knoa kiai both a* ? ? ar*. ?mon
men and as a man of know - ability
to asaum? of the Pisa?.
il ?flee, num of
1. I tut man ij Re*,??.
Roosevelt is the onlj man in ti,? country
. an both 'iil th? bill and defeat Wilson
raen m '?he COBBt**} u.
day. W i. "H Bad il'""-'
Pour million :';ve hundred thousand Hooi?.
velt ft H Peor third. Th?r?
? han '.'?i???.""" Roe ?veil taten to*
da] g to be a ? mil policy
' COifit
If they eating
if? ??
? ?'.* fo
the Republican nominee.
that Th? ; work
foe the I.. ? . and f
ral. felloaiaj
The Tribune's lead, will not peri;-- the rob*
"i'st?kc of
i"i ' RDI ARD ?. i "".'.MAN.
H.*.:.-.n. Marel
A CELTO PRUSSIAN REBUKE
By One Who Understands Cond
lions in Ireland.
Tribune.
Sir: I am exceedingly interested in *
T. I. Hurley's letter, published in The Tn
I was in Inland for se
pre ?? ??I* of t'
'
i "maddened
obbery and p?*
. - .-? ,.?? .\ to d ?' st tl
? . ied altars and burnii
I : ty Cork, ii
.?re; i believe, therefore, i had an c
mething of the ter
f the | ??, eapecially since my si u?
of th? ? ? ??? g ? illy In lured n
a friendly greeting. The people, as a nil
| ,- ? ? ed ?I'd fairly pro -per
i that eonditiona in In
lead il y improving. I saw i
I
ruined altars and burnir
i rue, " ' that progi
i could have sriahed for, b<
that brought ibout by hatred ?
i id. Love
'. in lier advancement woul
seem a bett?
tat? ... .,11 [r,ahmen both ?
home and abroad are pro ?.erman I can r<
? - . .... Many of m
? Mallow a?-e at pi
? ins? When die Tnbun
published a letter of i
calling to "A Little Hook of Iris
eh ? aa b? g ?? to proi Ida ad
? r Iriah troops wounde
a-.I ?n the field the Bril -'i army, th
if the volu" 10 many <?t
the i etter was print
(d thai ipply of book? was exhauate
? had order a i em
Mr. Hurley all . - .-ere ?ir- 'lie !r 1
the Bril ih army. Any newapape
??? d him of the gallantry of Iris!
real of the Allie.
th? Balkans. If he wiahes ai
the deed? of Irishmen at liallip
? . ... ...
of ar months I
"New Ireland," an Irish weekly review prnu
e.| in D
\ ft r-'ier NIC ft I 'en* ?M-- -,, .
? to help Ireland I
io\0 1er niore ;i - '. ; ? .,* e I. a ? 1 H j
I- ngland. Of ? hal ?o Ireland
romplete freedom or as n
th Germany be? Celtic and Prui
? . -- are in dire.*- opposition: th? ' ?
hi l'rus*ian rub
elf to au' . ril ?M this tim<
ret I to n member th?
proverb about jumping ?'mm the fry ng pa
fire.
.OR.
ork. Ma 191?*.
Christianity and War.
T?) t ! ? af Tne Tr bui *
Sir: I note in II I ?'s Tribune a teplj
1 . ? ? Rev. I?r. Henry R. Kose to "The Re
? ribulion of min?
ags paredness which appeared .
- bune "ii l-cbru
I would have no ar? "er or reph
itian .-upporu-r ol
tai tic e ipl ?? loes r-eem
I .ti ; ' ? at a follower of th?
Greateat Io\er of Humanitj the world ha?
able to see how
-? taught to the
taking of the life of one man a
whether he !.e ?n khaki or not! I, or even
.- of '"- and the
. i ?r. Ilr,?"'.
letter ' "oo sadly evident that here
are | si tiaaity
: tai flowed during
the pasl iah from a tablet of
ia far a traed?the word*
"Thou .-halt not kill."
Hr. I :,:? ? ?.- taker? of
their own phi!, for liod help- them that
help ' ran only mean a
of the writer to take t.od into
? of other human
who are I ? , means any
i thing childi - whoa?
? ? . ? and unjust, the evil
? "'" the -ame nature of
the a" ? ache .
??nnuti an?l
r contradictory,
ga of 4 rial
i baa? ? * la ? ?;? the
But i am familiar, a? Dr
be, w ?th certain words of it.un -
hat the true attitude of hi? followers
i be toward their fellow?, even tht.r
I cnem.e
j> th? pai irch of t hrlat n'.
;!* * ' ?to ?nfront and BVereOBI? lb?
"? bv other mean.? tha-i
! ?-ii orry to tee Dr. Ft? s?
? ? ? aaaar, ?nd i
r then, a,,,| ?thai lay
Chrial iq leaeaa ?>f mind tl,e?e
? I'" '?' dei ? ?g'on : "\\ hi
eall .?? me Lord, Lord, and ?l<> not the things
! ?bat I ?nd in thil .-..rrie.-tion tlie reit
three reraei Luka si, i.-i.?, make interest-,
'.ii?; itasUag? J
The. "salvation of the churehe?. I
homes an?! ideals" that 1"*. Ro i la inxioua
about cannot, come through the munition
makers be |a willing to call bio?"????! Bill
it ?-an como through the true foil?? r.g of
tha word?! of Him who sai?! : '"M. k
:? not of this worl'l: If my kingdom were 0?
tl ? world, then ? lervants light.''
Whose kingdom ia Dr Roae preacl
Lei lia "prepare" t.< I"? ? I I it ?ana.
ADIN BALLOU.
( atakill, N. Y? Match 9, I
Compensations at Annapolis.
To the Editor o' 1 : e T\ bune.
May I. aa a gradual??, aaaura "'
Mothfr" that if 1er ion keopi lip ?. '
class ho will, in due sea ion, reach the
it; international law, uhere he a
be ?natraetod in ?ne fact- regarding th<
Appam, but in the analysis of them under
such international law as remains after Wil?
helm s trasse, the Adminiatrstion and Congress
?niah with . ?'.' fa the mean lime he i a un
doubtedly fully and better oeeupii ?I I o
in .i moas of mon exact
|,ap??r accounta of thia and correal
4urrent events. Further, the need no(
that the time given up to games n g\ *
be dc ? * ? d neo ipaper !??*?? . 11 .
reason that the time given up to the e gam? >
is after hours which in numbers and in in
tanaiveneai bear to th<?-<? <?
proporl on e"' ?" vhat similar t.. that bet
a hi?**h ?i-1?."! an?| a kinderga
Regarding the r??la' mid?
shipmen and officera, let m ??? thai ??
her son's claaamai el
friend of mine, brought up a? a civilian .
mho serve,) ?? a commiaaioi
navy during the Spanish Wa-, and nnol
?* another eivilian who aerv?ed a*
,-. petty officer in 1898, and neither of them
compla'n nh,?M? tl;?? la?-'- ?' ntercoUl r?'
the midshipmen and their super??,
undoubtedly h?rd for one arho never
expcr.erc???! I I I BOO
','?'.?? ?< understand tl at ?I a< * tall) betl
every way far the embryo officer to "
s? If" rather than that h,? should be brought
up hv bond, a?',d It i - '.a?tiy better for the
? 1 force of the navy that tho e who are
?o command them should have br??i bl
,) under condition -'??'
hon ? ?'eel and '
N?-\er mind about, the ezp
ant Berg or about the 1 I '
?ala. If "Middy's *' loea not rei
the exploita o ?"me of our own prize mas
tr-r-a tha ?feeri? r.?" Lieutenant Berg ean hardly
la-' long in men's tmnds, an?! tin
, || l?? ?,.? paaaing of nt?<? of *
?ast and moal meddleaome of those w.ho ? ?
i large a office. .' ?RAD?A I'K.
Brooklyn, March 18, 1916.
Food and Peace Propaganda.
? t Editor of The Tribu' (
Sir: Only recently wo ?ia-.- fa led to be
deeply impraaaed bj a moving appeal foi
mi Ik for starving bobiea in Gern
???>?. ? red that the Germans ;
qua'e mili? supply f 0 r t h i s need, but to
sufficient to u*-e for more warlike pui
- following the
German example in apparently mak
for the Buffering women and children
of Prance, while actually trying to collect
money to pay Im spread ng al id thi
pea.-e propaganda. The Internal
itructioi League prop - u govern?
ment thai I ? '?' to upport the fol
.* ?
I? -rat A code of ir.ternatioi.al law.
nd A world cour' of juatieo a:nl in?
ternational commiaaion of inquiry for non?
? matter
Third The obligation of *". - ig
powera to pledge their economic an?l military
reaoureea for the ? of the cuurt'?,
??r cor. ?
Fourth Limitation of armai
international eon I
It i a paaaing
and the coi ifoi ? lid 80 blind
men of inttlligen The great
German nation for many months has
ipreme contempt toward iti ?,h
tcrnational agreement-, and
. karat teris ?"I ona of then* . ??,p of
paper"; yet our pac ' .,'?? now pr...
that ' ? . . r be practically
v.rned by a paper programme! If the
lid !??? funny.
ROSE II PHELPS.
H ?? - I . Matr'n ?_?::, |91?*j
Patriots' Day
I tor of The Tribune.
Sir: That is an fXCtllont and
of the r.'mpire State ?v, Sona of the
American Revolution, which >ou referrad to
yoattrdnjr, that thoae eititom who bol
preparedr.e-a . . .,>, belief _
playing the Mar, and Strip? m April 19,
Palriol ' l'a>.
The Congre ? i I the I i tod State
?? ??**''? ?I ? n< ml the \.
? ??? ?A..!.' ii,?? eonntry preparad, i -believe
to : ?I ,,??:?
people. Let the ???,,?,, ,, ,,,, ,? ;,, .
?iiie-t of this patriotic society, l ai
diapla) the flag and ?rill a?k in\ ?II (I boi to
???? ? PETER . ?WATSON.
N?B Vurk, March 21, 1911 I
OUR MERCHANT SERVICE
Some Facts Overlooked by Mr. F.
G. R. Gordon.
or of i e Tribune
? ? ? : ? tereat I
it b? ii
U e ft ?|| put ,,., r th? I ?
ihould the ?hipp
?
in the dai k Bgl I '" ?ertiotl
? ? ha? s paid '?> ?'or.- . ? ?? ]i,or,
mentioned by him, w? ne of
...
? ?
? attrr bow tv? aell, th? pur.
r pays th? Coat, a ??? -sal
01 cost, insurance and fn ght, com
f.. it all : .
price made hy th.. ???Her. :
il goodi
?idle to ?
sale.
- :!?* of
?
I this ? re ha
t rem? i " laaetti
? ?
?
?
when
who hi touch wil
might n
her of ? ? .' r .'.'?!?? .1 ; ?'? ? . a c-!*
if not more often ",,
I int
war, under the ab!<? dire. ? the I?'?*
Lord Invei
.- .
alwaj g ? '. th?t
?.a- ale
The Bril
up by men o' < a
tive, and if the f??
?
?
?
?
believe thai I American
they ki
telligent g
?
to get I
????**
? , ?
I picked up a mag *
culled f?
liona ' ?
"H" ? k'nffland '? ? ??? ?
.
lori. a great
-
world. I ai
?nan
?
'
teat i the world '-??
' '
cliei '
In another pair h- I
to change r. a mei '
'?
I
! rr.?.
? hook."
' am takii g up I
:
? ? h fact (
' ?
und all tl
v ?
ame
.1 . ? one word
?
JAMES ?.'<? BROWN'?
:
Join the Allies!
To tb? Editai tt Tat Tribune
.*-.:: I read with great interest R '
?! |ogi?al Bad thoughtful l
ter. publiahed m ? laaeBt iaaue,
"Break with Genaaay,"1 an?J agree with gttt
bis I'liiu'lusion?. Hy all im?"' ??*
look the fact ? ?jaar?l| m the :????' "!ul un.
filnchingl) saake ?ar staad ?'?"' ii.'h? *?"?
? ra b) aidiag tb? Alii*? m !r",r n"""
I . ? m? exagg.THt. ' ? ? ?.'-'??* ''?*
m,?, of thi l?? public rei ts upon the su?*f**
of the All,.- AMl.KItAY
i .Neva *iork, Match 11, 191?.