New-York tribune. [volume], December 30, 1922, Page 2, Image 2

About New-York tribune. [volume] (New York [N.Y.]) 1866-1924

Image provided by: Library of Congress, Washington, DC

                
IB tkia satter? We are ?sat ?eekini
r*?er?'.on. W? are Indeed a?ktn|
far the reimbursement af the aaau
af our army ef eeeaaetlen, and wltl
?*e-od raasaa. far art .are maintain??
ear ?ruar la Carea? at lb? reqo??<
of the Alllet and of Germany an?1
un4?r an agreement that ita e??i
like army e??t? ?beuld Im i
nr?t chara-? upon th? ?mount? ?pet?'
by Ceraaany. Other? hare been staii
and w? have not seen paid.
But we are net aeeklng ,
reparation!. W? are hearing em
own burden and through oar leans
a larg? part af Lu rep? ? burd?n in
addition. No dt aaar.d? of eur? stand
ia th? w?y af a proper aettliment
ef the reparation question.
SBfM Bta held the obligations
-opean government? and there
has been much discussion abroad and
??r? w.tb respect to them. There has
. pr-?.stent attempt erst line?
? h? Armlctir? ta link up the debt?
to itr government with reper
aviena er ?rita prajeeta of eaneella
?i?n. This attempt *n re?i?ted in
nder the for?
mer *< "n and under th?
?*?tion. The matter
:? plam enough from our standpoint.
Th? capacity sf <a?rm?ny to pay la
net all affected by any indebted
ntt? ef any ef the Allies to us Th?t
indebtedness doe? not diminish tier
asaay's capacity, and its removal
would not lncraa?? her capacity.
For example, if Franc? had be?a able
to finance her part In th? war with?
out borrowing at ?11 from u?, that 1?,
by taxation and Internal loan?, the
problem of what Germany could pay
wauM M e-artly the same. Mor?
es-er. ao far aa the debtor? to the
United ?ttates sre concerned, they
hare unsettled credit balance?, end
?heir ronH.tien and capacity te pay
cannot be properly determined until
?mount that e?n h? realited on
these credit? for reparetiene haa been
determined.
trtUt Hat Presiden!'? Chacera
The Administration mu?t aise cor
alder till difficulty ariling from the
fact that the question of these obli?
gation? which we hold and what ?hall
he done with them ia not a question
? in the province of the Eaeeutiv?.
Not only may Congre?? deal with
public property of thi? ?orl, but it
has dealt with it. It ha? created s
ml??ion, and ln?t?ad of gluing
that eommi??lon broad powers sucn
as (he Administration proposed,
which, quite apart from cancellation,
might permit s sound discretion to
b? exercised in accordance with the
faets elicited, Congress haa placad
d?finit? rest-ictlons upon the power
ef the commission In providing for
the refunding of the?? debt?.
But what is our attitude toward
the question of reparations, standing
a? it doe? a? a distinct qusitien ana
? l one which cannot be settled on
Us? the European geverr.mente con?
cerned are ab!? to agree?
We have no desire to see Germany
reli??e?d of h?r reiponilblllty for the
war or of herjuat obligation? to mak?
reparation for the injuries due to her
aggr?sslen. There i? not the slight?
est d?sira that France ahall lose any
part of her just clalma. On th? ether
hand, w? An not with to see a proa
tret? Germany Thar? can be no eco?
nomic recuperation in Europe unless
Germany recup?rete?. There will b?
(.ermanetit peace unleaa aoonomic
(?tidaction? ?r? enjoyad. Thar?
must be hope, and industry must
h?v? promit? of reward If there la to
b? pro?perlty. We should view with
disfavor measurea which Instead of
producing reparation! would threaUn
Matter.
No Imnalted Arbitration
Some of our own people hsvt lug
? ??ted thtt th? t'ni'ed fetal?? ?fcould
?stum? th? rola of arbiter. There
?MM ?ufficent answer to this aug
???? vi?t f? that we have
net Been asked to ???urn? the rola
of arbiter. There could be no auch
?rhltraraent unless it were invited,
and It would b? an ?ttraordlnary
and unprecedented thing for ui to
aik for such an invitation.
I do not think that w? should en?
deavor to take sueh a burden of
responsibility. W? have quita enough
to bear without drawing to ouraelr??
all th? ill feeling which would result
from disappointed hop?? and a ?ettl?
ment which wai viewed si forced
upon nstioni by thli country, which
i' th? ?ame time I? demanding the
payment of iti debt!.
But th? ?ituation do?? call for a
? stt1?m*nt upon it? merit?. The
fleet condition of a ?atlsfaetory set?
tlement ii that the question should
be taken out of politics. !Uat??m?n
has? their difficulties, their public
opinion, the exlg?ncl?? which they
n.us? rasa, It li devoutly to be
kopid that they will eff?ct a settle
ment among themselves, ?nd that th?
coming m??tin?; at Paris will find a
solution. But If it does not, what
should be done? The alternative of
forcible meaitirei to obtain repara?
tion? I? not ?n attractive on?. S'o
one ran foretell the extent of the
? ?rloui coni?qu?ncei which might
? n?u? from iuch ? course. Apart
from political result* I l.elieve that
' opinion of ?xpsrts is thai such
??-.??surei will not produce repsrs
tlen payment? but might tend to
dettroy th? baaia ef those payment?
which muit b? found In economic
?ecuperetion.
Moot Disregard Bentlmant
If. however, ?tat? ?;r,?i> cannot
^ ?gr?? ?nd ?uch an alternativ? |?
m are.i. wh?t e?n he don?? 1? there
M not ?nother way out? Th? fund?
V a-erita) condition is that in thi? crlti
?*?1 moment th? mints ?f the
?ue?tlon, a? an economic one, must
?Ion? b? retarded. Ker.timent, how?
ever natural, mu?t be disregarded;
mutual recrimination? ar? of no
avail, review? of th? paat. wh?th?r
accurate or n accurate, promt?? noth?
ing; ???ertion? of blame on tha one
hand and ?xcute? en the other come
t# naught.
There ought to be a way for itaUi
m?n to agree upon what (Jer
can psy, for no matter what clalmi
may he made aga,n?t her, that ia tha
limit of ?at ?f?ctlon. There ought to
he a ?*?*>? lo determm? that limit and
to provld? a financial plan by which
imm?diat? r??ulta can be obtained
and the European natiot;? can feel
that th? foundation ha? been laid
far their mutual and ?arneat en?
deavor? to bring about th? utmoat
prosperity to which the industry of
their people entitle them
If ?tetetmen cannot agree, and ex
igenci?? of public opinion make thair
?oars? difficult, then ther? should be
called to their aid those who can
point th? way to a ?ciut on.
Why ?hould they not invite man
of th? highest authority in finance
n their respective countries n?t
ef ?uch preitlge, atperlence and
honor that their agreement upon
? amount to be paid, and upon a
? - cial plan for working out th?
payment?, would he accepted through?
out the world aa the raoat authori?
tative expression obtainable? Gov?
ernment? n??d not bind th?m??lv?s
in advance te accept th? recommen?
dation?, but they can at !???! mak?
paasibla each laaalry with their ap?
proval and free the men who may
represent their country in each a
a?, a? m i ??ion from any re?pon?ibility
o Foreign Offices and from any
duty to ?b?y political instructions
Tn Is. th?y may invite
? n answer t? thi? difficult and pro??
mg question from men of lueh
??ending ?nd in ?uch clrcumt'aneei
r?edom a? will ir.sur? a reply
prampted onlr by hnowledg? ?nd
? loante. I ha*? no doubt that du
r . shad Americana would be will
\og t? ?eiv? oi. s.ch s commitilon.
?irnimnu ?sw lit to reject the
?ectiramendition upon which such a
body agreed, they weald be free ta
ae ?a, hat lacy vroaU ha?-e the ad
vantage of Impartial a?tvle? an? of
ss ?sTight.ned aahlic apiriian. Pso
"?. would ss infermed. the ?lae.tion
Uu\? ?> r..es?s fwts ??"rtlon*,r.?
cWater-a???rtion. ?nd th. probUm
put upon it? way to ?olutlon.
F | do not believe that any general
.?nf?r??e? would as?w?r th? r?r??i
keu? much Isa* that any political
c?nf?r?nc? would seco?P'?f ? T*'
?ult which pr?mi?r? find t -npo?"
hie to r.ach. But I do bell.v. th.t ?
?mall grew. g*?v?n proper B"i__*?
action, would he abl. ?son tadavi?;
? proper plan. It would be time
sassghu esaai<lsr forcibl? ???sure?
?fur ?uch an opportunity had be? n
"h.estsot latia body would not
only hs aap-rt but friendly. It would
net be hound by apscial official obli?
gation?; it would hav. no .nimu? ?nd
no duty but ts find and ttate the
truth. In a situation which require?
an absence of technicality and las?
?sanity from lnUrf?r?ro?t? 1 hop? that
th? way may ?son be found f?r ?
frank dleeussion and determination
ef wh?t I? ????stlally an seonomle
problem.
The UniUd Sut?? h?? the mo?,
fr endly and di?int?re?t?d purpo?? in
this matter and wishes ts aid in any
practicable way. but it '? idle to
mak? ?ugg??tions which arose-? falsa
hope? end are ?o impracticable that
th.y e?nnot hear fruit. On the other
hand th?r? ?leos opart a broad ?v?nu?
?f opportunity If tho?. who?* volun?
tary action i? indi?pen?able are will?
ing to Uke advantage of it. An?i
enee this i? don. th? av.nu.? of
American helpfulness csnnot fsll to
osen hopefully.
?etsry Hughe? wa* given an M?
thu?ia?tlc reesptlon wh?n he arrived
to ?peak in Wool?.v Hall. Aft-*
speech Secretary Hughe?, with S;r
Robert I, Borden, former Premier of
Canada. h?l* a reception in the Tren
dent'? room in Wool?.y Hall.
Mr. Hue-he? arrived from Washing
ten at ?ix o'clock thi? ?v?ning. H?
was met at the railroad station by
im>i Rowland Ang.ll, preildent of
Ysle: Professor Max Parrand, and C.
H. Htiring. Thty motor.d to Or. An?
gel?'? resident in Proipect Street for
dinner. Secretary Hughe? left Ute
to-night fer Washington.
?
Washington
Awaits Paris
Parley Result
?CM..?? **??* **0* ?Ml
held in Bruitala to which the United
State? might be Invited.
l?t?r Senator Borah made thi? com?
ment:
"I heliev? that under the circum?
stance? w? will hav? an economic con?
ference."
The dropping of the Bor?h ?mend
m.nt c?m? unexpected!) in the Senate
In the court? of prolonged debate. It
happened with dramatic tuddenne?*.
Senator Wateon held th? floor and ?*??*
?p.?king agalnit the amendment. H>
contended it would .mb?rr??? the Pre?
id?nt. Senator Watton di?rlo*?d that
thi? government had put out "feeler?"
fer a conference. Senator Borah got
into colloquies with Senator W?t?on,
Senator McCormick and Senator Lodge.
Senator McCormick di?clo?ed that a
conference wa? projected for Bru??e!?
in which th? United Sut?? was likely
to be Invited and Senator Lodge con?
firmed the fact that thi? government
had sounded out foreign government?
through it? representative? abroad on
doing ?emtthing to help the European
tituation.
Thereupon Senator Borah ??id that
m rfsw of th? fact negotiation? were
in progre?? and that In? amendment
would, a? stated, embarra?* the Admin?
l?tr?tion, he would withdraw it.
Technically, the amendment wa? rim
ply dropped, rather than withdrawn,
a? it had not been formally offered.
Had it been pr????d to a vote, it would
hav? been defeated. Supporter* of the
Borsh amendment profe??ed to hailth.
outcome with satisfaction. They de?
clared that th? Borah amendment and
th? di?cu??ion of it had "smok?d out"
the plan of th? government for deal?
ing with European affair?. Senator
H?flln, of Alabama, Democrat, one of
the ?apporter? of the ?mendment, ?aid
it ought to be brought forward again
and pretented, but he did not intro?
duce it.
The Senate did not finiih the con
? Idtration of the naval bill. The
House prevision for s conference on
the limitation of auxiliary naval craft
?till remain? in the hill, though the
meacure ha? not yet been finally die
poied of. Senator King will preia hi?
propot.l for an International confer?
ence on land and ?.? disarmament.
Prior to the abandonment of the
Borsh amendment, the Senate agsin
discusaed thi? proposal from noon
until shortly aff?r 4 o'clock. Set?
tors Johnson, Mose*, Kellogg and 3V.t
aon oppoted the amendment. Senator
Borah tpoke at length for it. It wa?
in th? cour?? of Senator Wat?nn'?
?peech that th? exchanges occurred
which resulted in dltcloiure of the
f?ct that a conference 1? expected and
that led to Senator Bor?h'? announce
ment of withdrawal. A? on yeiterd.v
?nd the day b?fer?, th. gsllsrist wore
crowded ?nd ?pectator? and Senator?
m?nif??t?d keen irrter.it in the de
bat*.
"Thi? ?m?ndm?nt of the Besataf
fTSn Idaho," ?aid WaUon, "does em
b?rr??? th? chief ?xecutive. I w.ll Co
so far as to ?ay thing? have been done
, looking to a conference It, the future
I But the Preiiderrt doe? not propo?? to
! be goaded into calling . conference for
?rmament?. Personally I am ir. favor
of ?uch a conf?r?nc?. hut 1 want it?
limit? wall defined "
"Th? 8?nater ha? ?ugge?ted that I
withdraw my propotsd ?mendment.'
?aid R?n?tor Borsh.
*llt\ I h?ve not euggeited It but I
would wsicom? ?uch action," Senator
W?t?on replied
"I'Pon ???urance? from th* Senator
from Indiana that negotiation* have
bees entered into, I will withdraw my
, amendment." ?aid Senator Borah.
Senator Borah pre??ed S.n.tot Wst
, ?on to know if ?her. were negotiation*
in progre?? at to calling an economic
i conf?rent*.
' \o, not negotiation?," said f ?.nator
Watson. "What I taid wat that feel
, era had been put out; that foreign na
, tion? were being sounded with s view
to (lading out whether the United
Sute? may be helpful and that in my
< opinion it might lead to a conference";
that I had no authority whatever to
1 ?ay that."
H? ?aid that h? ?pok? a? an individ
ual but wat not entirely ignorant that
"th?te f??ler? have bsen put out jutt
? i th? President in hi? Utter etates."
Senator Borah questioned Senator
watton wh?th?r th? feeler? had
r?ached th? ?tag* 0f negotiation?.
"Cesversatiens," said Senator Lodge
Coavertationt scron th? sea." ?aid
Senator Borsh. "snd I understand th*
Senater to esy that conversation? or
feelers had bsen put ent looking to
ascertaining wh.th.r or not the *
States could be helpful in adjusting
this situation or thi? eoaditlon of at?
tain in Euros?, and that th? Senator'?
epinioB was that they ultimately
would lead to a coafersnes covering
the question ef the economic ?
tlon?."
Watten Exports Parley
"Or to some gathering.** said Ben?
stor Wstasn, "for the purpose of de
tertaining the crobl.m. That t? raj
part ef the epin'.or. which I hav? _t>
pressed.**
"But the Senator doe? know that
the f??l?r? hav? been put out**' aakeu
Serator Borah
"That i? my und.rsuading," replied
Senator Watton.
Senate Wauen ?aid b? was aot
America Amply Safeguarded
By Naval Treaty, Says Hughes
Denie* km Efa*Ni of Term* Abroad ami Dwlaren
There U No Danger of War if Provision? Are < -ar
ried Ont in IVe-ent Friendly. BwWIlMi *>|?'"t
Upen? r?? Tria*?*
\EW II? ?t.. Dec. 2
Charle? E. Hughe?. Secretary ..f S1
and head of ?the American dcleral
in the Wa?hington Conference on
Limitation of A and
??iaenaalon of Far Basten qurstli
reviewed the history of that con:
ence and teld of its important reu
to-night in his ?ddres? before
Amer.can Hiltorical A? "cation he1
The importance of the confers?
he said, lay in the readiness of
tions to join in sue
the 'rankiie?. and lack of guile w
which it waa carried on an.I in
result? accomplished, directly and
directly. He had no he?
eaying th?t he regarded the incllr
results a? the more important as i
mist? of misunderstandings amo
nations were cleared, ugly, war-bre.
ing rumors exorcised en<J ;?
Report? No f'vaslon of Treat >
?s et ?t r??t explicitly rumors th
oth?r ?ignatory power? treeg
w?y seeking to evade Ihs proviiion?
the ?greement reached in Washingtc
saying:
"I am happy t<> say that at this tir
there seems no good reason to fe
that any of the work of the ronfe
ence will be lost.
"I am advised that the compete
authorities of <>?ir government h?
no Information that any pov i
ing the exthstigr of ratifie?,
th? tre?t>, is proceeding contrary i
those provisions."
Seeprtan* Hughes made it pial
however, ihat in his opinion 'he |.
?rietsbillty of the treaty nnd the hen.
fits derived from it depende?' upon th
maintaining of the attitude of fr?en?
lines? and reaionablene?? with whic
the nations concerne.1 entered th
conference.
"Probably there never waa an inte?
national gathering," ?aid Bee reta i
Hughes, "in which candor and fairne?
mor? fully dominated the in*
of great powers ?mil where intrigu
had less play."
He spoke of the panicky distru?
which beset the world at the |
conference was railed, the fen
of ev'l which arose M sil ?Ides an.
the readiness with which bellicose ru
mnr? were accepted
"There was instant appreciation," h
: .'?king of the prompt accept
anee ..f the American invitation to
d!??rm?ment conference, "of the fac
that the hour hud ?truck not only t
discuss limitation of arms hut to d.
even s better thing in ?eek;ng to re
move causes of misunderstanding. Th.
combination of the two objects wa
the outstanding feature of the Amrri
ran proposal."
I r-dit? Success to Four Factors
The "Urre mes?urc of su-<'
tair.ed by the conference was due. Sec
retary Hughes said, to four factors:
"First, there were represented at thi
nee a small croup of powen
dealing with problems in which the;
had c?.mmon interest?. There wa*. i
minimum of dissipation of energy ii
irreUvancie?, Discussions were kep'
to the point and we ?ne ?-?ved th?
embarrassment of intrigue? and cabals
"Second, there was adherence to th?
proposal of a single conference a?
originally presented We felt It to bf
impracticable to arrange for a pre?
liminary conference bi'tween some ol
the invl'c'! power? with respect lc
Filtern questions. Other invited
powers might have justly ec.r>iplained
l a preliminary meeting, in
which they would have no ?hare. It
?as? felt that if ?uch a preliminary
ce were announced it would
lead to th? feoling in this coi;'
the important saestlen ?>f limitation of
armament had been sidetrack'
it was deemed desirable to give the
opportunity to deal with both groups
01 ?uhjects. it would have been o dif?
ferent ?natter ?o p.'-toone th? ...
of limitation of armament to a ?
conference, the holding of which might
he altogether dependent on the su
of the first. It was also believed to
he of vital Importance Ihat the con?
ference should he held in Washington
The?e reasons held u? to our original
purp"
F.xampU Se? by t'nltrd States
"Third, it was the great privilge of
our government through it? initial pro?
posal to lead the tray in suggesting the
proportional? sacrifices which were
essential to an agreement for the lim?
itation of naval armament and thus at
the very outset to disarm suspicion
and to create the atmosphire essential
to harmonious endeavor.
irth, the representatives of the
powers, intent on limited ?n.i practical
?,m? which they knew would con"
to their peace and security, inhibited
a remarkable spirit of n and
a mutual cuntid? neu rare in interna
gatherings. They expressed
view? both with candor and *vlth
the assurance that the criference was
dominated by the desire trr deal juatU
with every* important national interest. '
In ipite of these advantage?, laid
Secretary Hugh??, th? conf. -
labored under many difficulties, some
of which men of vision regarded as
insuperable.
"While the ?ihai.tuiig settlement lay i
outside the conference.'' he ?si !
is not too much to say that the success
of th? confercme hu??:; "pon this ?
tlrmenl."
1 n-rllLn Rf-sult? l.rratest.
"The most important results."
continued, "are those which are
written and imponderable. II
relate to sentiment "
good will and a better underitandi
When ther? is frlen.lahip ?nd coi
.lence. tre?tie? to m?m'?.n peace I
of least Importance and where ?
?nd hatred domin?t? t?
r.? peoples it may be wil? ?O intcip?
the mechanism of conciliation hut I
best assurance of peace is lacking.
"If you would mea?ur? the work
UM conference contrast the. pr???
opinion as I \"?.i
with ?he view that wa? widely held a
constentty aauraaoea *?*?*? ?he ???
I The saiStS whi
many called war cloud? have been d
palled Confidence has been restop
fears allayed and a new feeling of i
?pert and fr.endlhip engendered.
"Auto suggestion has an imports
place in national, a? well as individu
life, and nations intent on peace w
find the ways of peace "
Hammarliea Pre?ent Res tit?
minting out thai the "?*?' *'???
? be in force until a
tion? ilgning it have ral
! la-he? showed specifically ho
each nation already wa? conforming
its provisions, hi? aummary of the
actions being:
tad ?States?Immediately ?ft?
the signing of the treaty the goveri
' the United SUte? suspend'
?it work on ?hip? ?trueno
which will be ?crapped when the treat
becomes effective. With th? eseeptio
of the Connecticut, whirh ?*
be placed out of eoromi??lon, all battll
I disposed ?if unde
,? of the treat) aie nu? out c
commission and are ready to b
scrapi"
"Rritish tapir*- H> the treatv th
1 the con?tru<
' the four B? . had beei
projected. I am advised that of th
?ther capital ships which i
was provided in the treaty should b
scrapped fourteen have either been al
ready sold ?ml removed by ihipbrrak
ing firms for breaking up or ha.? bee
rendered incapable of war service, an
two more of these ships will be ren
dered incapable of war service befor
the end 01 thi? month.
"Japan I am informed that J?p?
has ?uspriulrd work on the bat!
under constru?tlon. for the serappin
of which the treaty provides; also tha
certain preliminary preparation? hat
been made ?n that the ither ship?
tltS treaty for scrappini
may he scrapper) as soon aa the treat
?
Shown lair BJ Protest?
ce of the fairne?? of the pro
raaiy was ;
Hughe? said, in the |sjj
??ts that cam.
in the United States, (?real Britain am
Japan a made known
ma influential person
?issertlrt? that their nation wa
I Ins ted agnlnst.
For his part, he said, he belie-ed Ir
maintaining "an efficient navy up t.
the treaty its ; for rea
sons nf ?ecurity. hut In order that thi
1'nlted . it have an assure?
hasls for any new rationing of war
ships that might he made at anothei
conference
There had -ism in thii
coui.try, Secretary Hughes said, at th.
provisions of the treaty n
fortifications. The tales, hi
eJtplained, wa? barred ?
from strengthening its fortirtcations ir
the Philippines, (iuam and the
Islands.
The prohibition against Guam, h?
said, had born a orne naval
authorities, who rccogni/.ed that ?In
island might be made into an American
Gibraltar. For thi? very reason,
tary Hughes pointed out, any move to?
ward fortifying it would cause uneasi?
ness to any powei with interests in
the Pacific.
II* added that t^o?? mo?t deairoua
of fortifying (iuam probably overlooked
the fact that it could I with?
out th? authoruatioi, ., ?nd,
water Henry Cabot Ledga had
point. gresi took ?., little in
' Gibraltar** that
it had not evi n provided a government
f"r I?, leaving it to the BBVJ which cap?
tured it to administer its affair?.
Hold? Statua t'uo W ?a? I'ollry
"Wat it not better." asked Secretary
ee, "that at a time of conilderahle
tension, instead of threatening Jap.in
by a proposal to fortify Guam, we
Id agree th. I years we
should rest content with the situation
arhieh we had been ?etiified for
the last twenty-three years" A
be red thai In th ? ?ame
treaty Japan undertakes te maintain
the status quo In the Kurile Islands,
the Bonin Islands, Amami-Oshima, the
I.oc.choo Islands, Form?la and th
cadorei and any other insular pos?
session? ?he may hereafter acquire.
? conclusion is that the Naval
Treaty will stand the test of analy
d fair statement, t-.king all the
pertinent fact? into considerate.'.
that it will be a desiralu'' safeguard
and not a menace to our security and,
at the same time, an important assur?
ance of peace. These happy reiult!
will be attained, however, on th? con?
dition that we act toward other na?
tions in th? same spirit of reasonable?
ness and friendship that we expect
them to exhibit toward ur. '
there to ?ay the P ?irted
out to call a conference ?uch as the
Senator from Idaho propof d. but for [
two or three month? feeler? had been
put out to atcertain how far the Preii
d?nt could go and other nations would
go in adjustment of the situation.**
Senator McCormick pointed out that
conversation? had basa continued for
three month? looking to ? conf?
! ?l Bru-sel?, always provided th*'
; powers which ???embled in <onf<
could reach ?orne baii? of agreement
i upon which they could proceed.
He asked what other reason I
be for calling Colonel Harvey
home th?n to consult him anout Ko
rcpe?n c?.ndition?.
?tor Borah then wanted Is km?
vhether the Inred Btatss would call
th? Bruatelt conference or ?ome other
government, and to what extent th"
negotiation? ??ad prejrtaaed.
"If the Senator will permit a t**f|
I humki? per?or. to tno.tr I will say
that I know itept have been taken to
the end that a conference may ?it in
Bru.tele to rontlder th? scoi
?Itu.tion." ?niwered Sen.tor McCor?
mick. "and that the United Sutes may
he Invited to take part.**
"And w? are to be a part of the con?
ference?" a?ked Senator Borah. "Doss
the Senator know our government has
been In on these conver*ation?T"
Senator McCormick. who had taken
hit teat, made no reply.
inay say," isid Senstor Lodge,
"that through the usual channel? *
beiiador? ar d mlnl.ter.?th? I
-
be h.ipfu
Europe?* condit;?in?. what thi* govern
ng "
"Do?? the Serst'ir from Massachu
UHah th* ?dip?ion of my amend
msot would be embarrassing ts the
lent in hi? negotiations?" atked,
Senator Rorah.
"I think it would be harmful, yes," i
Senator Lode? replied.
"Then upon the ?Uter/.ent of th?
chairman of the Foreign Relation?
Committee I am willing to withdraw it."
"1 he Senator from Idaho," ?aii
ator Reed, of Minouri, "it withdraw?
ing the proportion on ?uiplclon. I
would Ilk? to know what has been
done. It i? shout time to quit thi? pol
ai secrecy and mystery end whit
pering regarding what the government
ng, I am unwilling that a great
buiines? thould be conducted behind
und curtain* when it Involve?
in of great public concern and
there it no need of lecreey. Why i?
it when dealing with foreign relations
we have to put on \elM-: ?lipper? and go
?neaking ?round and whi?perlng? Why
can't the Pre?id?nt boldly ?ay: 'I have
a?kei the foreign government? what
they will do, and when I hear from
them I will advite the Senat? and per
hap? a?k it? a??i?Unce?'
"I regard the Pre??dent? attempt to
lecture th. Senate in the letter which
he ?eut to Senator Lodge, for it wa? s
lecture, a? a piece of very bad ta?ta.
Yet I recall that in hi? inaugural he
?aid he felt that he wou'.d be Beet
burdened with th. r.spontibilitie? ex?
cept that he hoped be would have the
constant a??i?tance of th. repr?**
Usas of the American people in Con?
gress."
Senator Mose?, ef New Hemp?! ;re,
in a charscterietic speech, poured
on the Hor?h .mer.dment H?
??id it had already cau-.?d f?mi?h.d
?nd voraciou? peopl?? to "visuel .
a? a ?.?graphic ?
.'.or Moaei declared th?
propaganda "to entangle u? in Euro
p*?n affaira ha?] never ceated."
Near East War
Looms as Alii?1**
Draw Up Treaty
\nieritan K.moy Udl ? "
trntr at IjniHamic '?? I*4
fort It? <>3avftOSM lurks'
Slill SliibhornOppo-ilion
Report Seen in Two D*J*
l nitral Stairs in N-.'oiul
Pira to Morri?a to ??nuil
\un.niana Protection
K?ceiol t'nblr to TS* T"'
rmmyrn
pA, he new w?r men
.0, in the Ne.r Baal la **! ***** ?n''
more over.h.dowed the dwindling la
tere.t in th. approaching r.p.ratlon*
conferercr*. With ne.ther Allie, nor
Turk. yielding sn inch on -koMBBtsni
la.ue. of Mo.ul ?nd esaltslstlsris. ?nd
with the Briti.h fleet ?.??"??'?? to
ConiUrtinople, the prospect or a
bre.k grew stronger hourly.
The draft of the tresty now in prep
.ratio,, b> Allied ??pert?. ?11* the
?dviee of Richard waahtani Child.
American Amblador to Italy, will be
pre.ented to the Turk? in the form Si
an ultimatum within a few day?.
tra? indicted her... The tett ?.III put
lull r. ?pon?lbilit. for the break-up of
the conf.rence on the ?boulder? 8
h delegation if they raft
A *c?thing indictment of A
and Kran. C" Tchitcheriti.
? ilelepste at Lausanne, will be a
feature of an interview with the Ru?
sian spokesman in to-morrow'* "M?
tin." Predicting ?v.r in the Near Esat
s? s result of th?- Allied ?Men : -
control Turkey. Tchitcherin
the French and American
for deserting their rightful reli
meiliatur*. to align them.elvc*
Britain n It* di?a?trou.*? policy :<>?a _i,I
irhi.
II.' ,.y? Runis will never ?ign any
treaty ?Itawn up ;it Lausanne, end if
the fur'?.* are ? ' will
only strengthen thoir rSSolve ??
ally to liberate Con.tsntihopl.? and the
Strait? from Allied dictstioi
????ions T?rke;* and Russia fighting
?ide by aid?* to undo the work of the
treaty.
LAUBANKE, Da?. -'9 i By The Asso?
ciated Prest).--Ameiie.-i made another
appeal la-da* in hshslf of the N.-nr
? et, when the delegate? rep
be United State? ?i th?
Easi p?'. ce conference presrntcd an
earne.1 plea that in the gineu?!
arrangements to be nef;, |
with Turk?; suitable provi.ion be mmle
for Armenian anil other refuge. -
fled from Turkey ?nd may M
turn ts their home?. The Am
risked Turkey to rc*torr to thc?e refu?
gee? their property.
Th. American ?utetnent ??id: "We
believe there will be no approvnl in
public opinion of the omission from
, ? ?re of some declaration by Tur?
key, preferably a voluntary de-lara
n-hich trill do justice Is
now ?offering deprivation of hot: ?
fortune."
U hat action the Kntente nation? will
take on the pie? of Armenia for a na
t'ontil home In Turkey ?vill prsbshly be
decided to-morrow, when the deUigate?
af ?.real Britain. Krar<-> ?ml Italy will
consider the petition presented to the
conference a few day? ?go.
No progrei? wa? made to-day by the
*uh-eommitsion on minorities, before
which the American appeal wa? pre
.i when general i of un
ne?ty were under dlasvssisn. 11 ?
ists to whom the amnesty clauic a
proposed trealv wa? submitted reported
they were unable to agree, n* bi
Turks and Greek? had int. -
many controversial politicel eoaatdera?
tion?.
.fronted by p?riment Turkith ob?
us, the sub-con-.'
drop the British amendmint stipulating
the appolntmmt of a L??gue ?>f Ms
tion? r?pre?entatlve to ?upcrviae Tin
','?.? treatment of .ninoritle?.
(?inference Deadlock (ontinur.
Th? conference deadlock on the big
i??ue* continu??. Apparently Angora
must ?peak before the Ottoman
gate? can make concession* of a nature
t.. ea?c the present delicate posit ?
the peace negotiation?.
Foreign Minister Tchitcherin of
.? to-d?y made public a New
Y.-.r'* ?pp.. to ttie American people,
??ying the Soviet?, while hoping for
n?ace In IKS, decried the method?
hcine* pur.u. I hy the Allie. hrrr.
Theie niethod? m?d? for naval war
fare. in?te?d of peac?. ?nd defeated
the plan* fram?d b*.* Ru?ri? for g?n?
er?! n?v.?l di??rm?ment ?long th.
of the W??hington ?greement?, he said
?argala Cataaa, British Foreign
Secretary ?nd hetod of the Briti.h
delegation, plan? to ?cave Sunday for
I'ari?. ?vhere he will remain until
fer?-nce with Premier Bonar
Law on the Near Lastern situation.
America Radio Ebadlci
Half Far East Traffic
28 IVr (?nt oi Kur??pi*aii >1?*.
sugra. Army Chid of Staff
Telia Imli.i House
An All?American radio now bundle?
it per cent of the menage trafile be?
tween here and Europe and M percent
of the tr.fflc to the F?r Boat, Major
General Harbord. Chief of Staff.
A., told the India Home yesterdi.y in
an addrett that commemorated two
eventt, his own retirement from the
army ?nd the eighth birthday of the
houie.
It wat a ?ort of trantitlonal period
for the retiring officer, not yet
out of th? ?rmy ?nd not yet
pre?ident of th? Radio Corporation of
America with which he will become at
?ociated upon his debut Into American
butin???.
After dwelling at ?om? length on the
memoriei conjured up by the club
with it? model? of the full-rigged
American tea clipper?, General Har?
bord launched into a description of
how the World War brought about the
formation of the corporation of which
he will be the head.
"Within two year?.'* taid the Gen?
eral "we evpect to give you direct
wirelet? ?enrice with Sweden, Poland
Italy. Holland. Argentine. Brail! and
China. Not only iriil you hsve tbit
wireles? communication, but you will
have, through competition, a greaily
improved cable lervice -radio L?
cable a competitor and not a tup
pltnter."
Try Polish \??;i??in Today
WARSAW, pec. 2icTh?r* i? interne
interett in the opening to-morrow of
the trial of M. Niewadoraiki for the
aiiasunation of President Narutowlet.
Long linea could be aeen ?II day ?
thr court hou?e. hundred? of ?
?pplying for the few court ticket? avail
able to the general public.
- procedure to be followed at the
tri?l li?? not yet been decided. There
i? no capital punishment in the Poll?h
l?w. but It ii reported the court will
make u?e of ?pedal procedure mtro
?lueed b> the German occupant! elect?
ing death as ths nunuhment for polit
I leal murder?. Thi? (?ormiti law has
1 aever boss ferasally rspsalsA
Crip on Criminals to Tighten
Under U.S. Secret Service Plan
Burn?? Perfecting System to Link Every Police Depart*
ment and All Peace Of?icm in ?Country With
Federal ??imminent Machinery to Curb Crook?
BVata The faetmms/, Hn.M?i/'o?i n
WASHINGTON. Der. ?'?. The, I?,
partin? nt i ?? perfects
? lab?rate plans fei tightening its gri
on the criminal slesSSBls of the cour
lay by Wl
' Ham J. Burns, chief of the Bureau o
Inve .tigali.o. 'I hi..ugh the effort! o
..?neral Haugherty and Hum
'nil criminal identification sys
I which will 1 i ni
up e department, sheriff am
peace officer with a national "rlcarlni
house" of eriiniiiiil information hire
plan ik confidently expectod \<
the twofold mmiIi of greatly de
rig the peaalhillties of crooks
from the lowest ?neak thief to the so
? -rapine daterrion, and
at tic ? fleeting a large
raving of money f... . i nment.
Ihou-aiid? of Arteries
ihe liejiartment
the heart
which, through literally thou?-.
reaching to the ?malle?t
? will instantly coordinate all
i entire country
again tlaal, lack ? scheme
has been iirg? d for some time bv the
?si Organ I I hief..
which ha" earry on a
ilmilar work with" r fund' ..r,d with?
out a central dil
Burnt has falcan ov?r. at the n
quest of th? president and director
of that organisation, the par? lall
functioning machinery they estah
liahed. Hi? new weapon I? to h? eslle.
?he "National Bureau of Iden?ific?tioi
end Information." It will make avail
able to th? Federal operative? and 01
Instand demand of any law officer any
where in th? United .".??tes the finger
I print?, photogrspha and record! a
every known criminal.
Traveling F.spenaea He?>y
I nder th? pr???nt ?yst?m when th?
I Iienartment of Justice needs important
j information In Its investigation? It i?
r.ece??ary to und an agent long dis
t?nee?, with accompanying de|?y and
I heavy expense. Ths ?llmlnstlon of the
Item of trsvallng ripens? alone, it
. was declared by Burns, will save many
thousands of dollar? a year.
"W? can al?o ?av? a gr?at number
| of our Investigations and facilita??
matters tor oursalv?? by having place
officer? everywhere aid ua In lessening
crime by maklr.g It more difficult for
the criminal to get away," said he
He pointed out also that "th?re i? no
ouestion hut that crim?nala generally
fear ths government more than they
] do the state?, because the criminal
' courts of the Federal government ara
I more successful, du? to tha fact that
' the juries and district attorney? are
not so much influenced by local eon
; * .derations in th? prosseutton of
Crimea."
Woodin Qui.
As Goal Stoc
Here Holds O?
iC??tl?s.? tiam ??(? ?Ml
?nd tie ltd his assista
are <??? ? .1 sf their dut
done wl
the new ('over?*
Mr. Wondin during hi?. service as F
[Administrator has hnd little If i
give to the affairs of the Am
I ir iirnl I Mipany.
r the morn tr
rporntii
?
??though, it
' e would have been plc.v
? ?itinue In ofl
,.1 shortage remair
with which tal
cone -
Shortage I p to Rallrosd
?1 on Lo
Isinnd put up squarely
II? MatiH Railroad
: \\ ood ?? I I when con
1 the State Fuel A
ministrator and Kalph Pall
., ?as made publ
In a . lin wr?
, to NIr .1 'hat t
can. and coi
: if th? railroad played
part. Mr. n liefen
of ths rosd and quilted figure? on shi
men?? 'hat the Long Isis
was handling coal fat in excess of
normal traffic.
: b] Mr. Peters sh<
though most of the lomplalr
Itiot office? hs
s Island snd th
.ent mora coi
..ilroad for diatrib
at the city.
he coal ye?r. begi
ning April 1 sn.l including th? fV
month? ? trike. during whl.
trat no production, there hi
he Long Island Ral
road v*', .i-.r ton? of anthracite, i
i r the sain.* period
Il a shortage of about !
while throughout th? sta
? of the city tl
is 40 per cent under 19',
t ??inplaint. I-rom Brooklyn
The complaint? which have pour?
- fall aclmlnlstri
k'yn and (Jureni ind
tha have been unabl
?he ligures produced h
prove that these section
far more fortunat? than an
I other part of the ttate.
The Mayor's committee of wome
?ation of free coi
in I " e-l**B to-d?
the opening of a ?tatlon at Wll
burg Flats. The need? of th
list be further r#
?dated Obi Com
par.y. which announced that it will tel
lit nine of its plants throughou
santa a bushel. This I
at th,. rate of about 112.60 a ton.
t'vtlertil I not Control
To (ontinuv for Monti
, President !Sot Ready to Relio
tfiiish Distribution: F. R
II ndleigh May Succeed S pern
MisWai
r.g has decided to continue th<
gt fuel dis
tribut.on for at least anothor month
oaaead to-day at the Whit?
Tl.ougi, ; .pen?, th?
present hatd of the office, hai resigned
and prisented a final report to thi
Presiden? upon the emergency meas?
ures taken sine?- the end of th? coal
' ttrik ? to assist the country in getting
: supply, an organisation ail) b?
to continue auch distribu
ctivities ?? are considered ?till
nary and to act as an assuranca
geney.
The fUf,| distribution office, created
under emergency legislation, may ha
usted or brought into existence
?gam ?t any time by Presidential proc?
lamation. Practically all ordsrs affeet
.nl movement? issued under Mr.
's regime have been worked out
I or withdrnI
The bituminous coal supplv of the
? country. Mr. Spens said in his report,
can be considered good, with no likeli
i ?ther conditions
i road oper
th?r? is a necessity for
of anthracite to utilit? substi?
tutes throughout th? winter, current
production waa exceeding expectation?,
the report ??id. Appreciation also wa?
expr????d for co-operation in the dis?
tribution effort? by the Interstate
merce ('ommiaaion. Hat?, fuel dlitribu
tor? and a majority of coal operator?.
'.e no announcement wa? made at
hite Rouse a? to Mr. Spens's sue
was understood that F. R.
igh. who hni been in charge of
is of its work, would h? named
for the pi?
?
K. j?.l Hrilis.li Bo>??iU
I ?V Bengal. British Indi?. Ose
Zt. A resolution proposing ? bo)cott
of British good? wa? r?J?et?,d to-day
by ?h?, all India Nationalist ( ongren.
The congress hegtt iti union? hers
Tu*?d?y,
Miners Ask
U. S. to Take
Over Mines
lOeatieeeS freo ?*?? ???'
the minen' plan, would conttltute th?
s?fegu?rd over the induttry for th?
public, ?inc. it would have the final
?yard on price ?nd quality of coal and
would control expenditure?
A bureau of wage measurement also
would be established, under th?* Fed
?ral Commission of Mines, which
would deal with wage questions as ?n
impartial body to make the necenary
te?ts snd prepare wage data. The min?
er?' union, however, would in ?ist on
retaining its right to collective bar?
gaining by it? repreeentat-.ve?. The
plan is ?lient on the auestlcn of re?
turning the right to strike, but Insist?
on the necessity of msintsining the
union a? an "Independent organiza?
tion of initiative and defense "
Separate and apart from all quea
tion of policy and wag?? would be the
national mining council, made up of
admlniatrative riead?. financial, tech?
nical and managerial, upon which
would devolve the actual administra
tion of the mine? and the production
of coal. With all thought of profit
rnsking removed and no question? of
wage? or policy to con?id?r. the min?
ing council could devote it??lf ?xclu
?ively to paining the greatest effi?
ciency in the production of coal.
The plan is offered tentsttvely. and
in the printed ropi?? which will he
distributed among the me/nbers of the
union provision is made tor eugge?
? ?nd criticism by the member?
ship. It i? pointed out, too, that sine?
the coal industry i? dependent on
tr?n?portation the miner?' progrsm is
identical with the progrsm of the rail?
road worker* for the nationalisation of
the railroads.
o
Heatle**? Landlord Gets
90 Days in Workhoui->e
L'pper Kaat Side Apartment
House Owner Kare* Court
Third Time in Week
For th? third time within a week
Jacob Solotoroff, of 57 East 102d Streit.
- of ?everal apartment houaes, was
convicted yeaterday of failing to pro?
vide heat and hot water for hi? tan
anta. On Tu??d?y llagiatrate Simpaon
m the Municipal term court imposed a
tine nf $800 when the tenante of four
houses In East 108th Street com
pl*in?d; on Thursday Solotoroff was
brought before Magistrate Mci.eehan
m the Morrliania court and got an ad?
journment only by d?po?ltlng a $800
certitud check for th. purcha?? of coal
for a houa? on Vys? Avtnue, the Bronx,
and yesterday Justice? Herrmann, Ed?
ward* and Melnerney in Special Ses?
sions sentenced him to the workhouse
for ninety day?. Th? sentence -trial be
?utpended If Solotoroff give? the ten?
ant? tttfficient he?t and hot water.
The conviction before th? Court of
Speelal ?Ses.ions y??t?rday wee en the
complaint of a tenant in on? of the
hou?e? in E??t 108th Street where Sol?
otoroff'? failure to tupply h?at resulted
in the $800 fine being Impoted by Mag?
istrat? Simpaon. A Health Department
impector t??ti??d that Solotoroff had
only one ton of coal In th? cellar for
the u?e of all four houie?.
M.giatrat? Karl A. Smith in th?
Washington Heights court held four
landlords in $800 bail each for trial In
the court of Spectal Sessions. He an?
nounced from the bench that he had no
sympat.-.y for owners of apartment
house? who pleaded th? ooal shortage
a? an ?xcu?e for not supplying heat.
Congress Will Be Asked
For 'Modern Navy' Fund
T e v h n i e a I Improvements
Abroad To Be Followed by
t . S., At-fording to Plan
WASHINGTON*. Dec. 2?, Congress
soon is to be asked for an appropria?
tion to "modernise" th? navy, Admin?
istration lesdere aald to-day, to follow
technical improvements adopted by the
British and other navtaa.
Chang?e to give naval guns greater
elevation and consequent larger rang??
conttltute th? principal item for which
an appropriation it to b? a?k?d. Sub
surface armamant, .?id, probably, mer?
naval aircraft, protection, submarines
ard ll?rht armored eruler alo may form
u part of the new program.
Secretary Denby wa? said to be work?
ing now on the supplemental ?stimates
which are to b? submitted to Congr???
through th? budget bureau. The new
appropriation? r?qu??t, it we? ?aid,
probably would com? up in connection
with one of the current deficiency ap?
propriation billa before Congre?? ad?
journ?.
? a
Customs Personnel BUI In
Beam Th, TV,**-?,?-? We?M <**?*? a?-??M?
WASHINGTON, Dec. ?.?Senator
Caldar to-day introduced a hill for
codification it ?11 law? sffeetlng ap?
pointment, duties and compensation of
cuttom? ?mploye??. Th? bill cre.t.?
?.?eral potltloni. and ahsltth.t ether?.
It doei not attempt to increase com?
pensation, but leaves with the
tary of the Treasury the authority to
increase or d.ir???? th? pay ef eu?
torn? officials as he may de?m wise.
| S.nator Caldar said th? bill had th?
approval sf ths test-sWxg sf tha Tssae?
ary.
Mumolini Let* Debt Qe, i
To Plan Home Reform
Ifopet to Rrnrgnnlze !taly*| L
trmalional Defence ?nate-arf ??
**WB?rtin|fM lime in p.-*,
Teem Ta? rr??i.a*'? a*???,.,, a?faa_
cigh? lilt. N?w Tork Trlfc??,^
ROMB, Dse. ?/-Unthsk?? |? ?,?\
termination nor u, ??i?r,d the teaia.
ence of Allied premiers m M^^H
uary 2, Premier n; ?__a **
hi? attention to p .raa-M-T
Italy'? Internal de' ' ?
r?ferm. Involving a ?i?.h (n the -_?*
annual expenditure of Vft.MQjsggfLzf
has been given pararr.r.mt D\?e? kig*
Caalnet m it? program of n?w ?__
legi?lation. eta,
Prsmier Mussolini feed th?
tion situation it to corapll?at?d_
? that any solution ii fcoZtT
and that, "time ?pent in p?r?t ?aa_?7_
waited.'' * ?*
The new defense pragra? n-|. {m
re.nforeeme, . ,???
carabineer? r th? ??.Lj
Ouard. thus ?er.dir.g h?
men t.. then or _-1 n ?? | etrioltraJatZ
tillers of ?he land The ???\?
toreo would be (|J -.^
picked m?n ready for ??.-? ?metf^Z
. ??'
fait with th?
tv**t4 TW
??'???a ?rdn
? J?T Isiar
? "? f.Mi
n internal >lef
volunteer mili? il
carabineer* i? f
Pr?ml?r is d?ter
d??l se
<n th? r
or th? Fkscisti
In an endeavor to ?olv? **??_?_
pIoym?nt p.
? lao will a't-mp* t., , ., , ?-f ???T*
cor ^r**tmam*aam\
videa guara* . *itt?i[j
''? ? -and vaauautm
thouaands to le..
Ame, f*
a
England Lavs Keel tor
KirM S|?j, | n(|,.r \rvJk\y
Large Niunhrr id I iii*m|il(,M?<J
K\j???l?il In It, (,r???lually
Ali??itlie?l in ^.irk
HiRJCKNHF.AD. r.ngl?nd. Dec 21 -.
Quietly, without cer?raony of ?ny kind,
the keel of the mw battleship raetntly
ordered by th? Br.tnh government it
accordance w.th the term? of ta?
Waihington naval tnsty wai laid In %
? hipy.ird cere to-day. Many tn?n ?J.
ready are engaged on ths advine?
work, ?uch ?? the ?taging, and a? ras?
terltl arrlvei for building th? rural
it is anticipated a larg? number of the
ur.?mploy?d will be gradually abi-ri-ei
This is on? of th>- twe new winhipf
th? construction of which Prim? Mis.
liter Bonar Law recently anneteitd
the government had decidid to atglt,
as permitted by the Waihington put,
ramme!. Laird ? To. ii building the
hull, while the contract? fer sm*-???*,
mounting? and general flttingi ?ill kt
distributed to ?eversl final.
The contract for the hall ef ths MS?
ond battUihip h?i h??n |iv?a U 111
Arm?tron?? Whitworti ? Ci,
of Nfwc?stle-on Tyn?. N? niwt hat
been received that the ke?l of th? 44t.
ond ve???-l has sctuslly be?s lud, kit
?s no special ceremory is mrsbif sad
ths contrseti ?t?pula?* that sert Bu?
ba ?tsrted this year, - may Wiucaal
that the preliminary work iltW/hfi
hand.
The two new wanhip? to betBsIr
Great Britain will b? .?sw^-iii
nought!. Their coiiitruction kBt?.
formity with the 6-5 3 ratio ?"" '
for Great Britain,
and Jsp.-in. (ire
the right under the
these ships as comp?
retention by Japan of ,., ??__. __,
similarly the it? ?si pn?.
legad to complete two ,.,000-Ur. lufMf?
drssdnoughts to replace th? North Da?
kota snd the Dtlasrs
,< tatrn
stl rWsr.
?sty m ?siis
loi thi
Vittit. 1*4
THE LEADING
MINERAL eWgj
New Year's Day
A Sp^ial Holiday Dtoa*
0
Celery
Chicken or Cream otOyitef
Soup
Roast Young Turkey
Dressing and Giblet Gravf
Cranberry Sauce
or
Roast Young Goose
Dressing and Goose Gti*T
Baked Apple
Boiled Onions with ?*-?*
Sauce
Mashed Turnips
Mashed Potatoes or 0-icd
Sweet Potato* .
Bread or Home Made &olU
Mince Pie and Cheejc
or Pumpkin Pic andCheest
or Ice Cream and Cake
Tern, Coffee, or Milk
?Si^-'iS?^