Newspaper Page Text
THE OHIO STAB. Published at Ravenna, Portage Co., Olio. .;". LYffliUf W. II ALX, Proprietor. ('-'- Trans. $1,50 rerannnm. . Rate of Advertising. . i One Square (or less) one week, $0 SO t. One 8quare, two weeks, - -- -0 75 One Square, three weeks, - ' 00 . ; Each aubseqnent insertion, - -- -- -"''C5 . A Liberal discount made lo those who advertise by the year. BJ No paper disconlinned nntil arrearage are paid, except at the option of ihe Publisher. BUSIAESS DIRECTORY. v.- PUBLIC OFFICERS IS PORTAGE COCSTT.' Lather Day, Commm Pleat Julge, 9th Disl. 2nd Sub-Division, composed of Trumhul' Portage -' and Mahoning counties. " ' " - "" .- Ebenezer Spalding, Clerk. ' " ' . " " ' tjoracs M. Clark. Deputy Clerk. . Luther L. Brown, Probate Judge. " ' " ' " James Woodard, Sheriff! ? ; ? ' John G. McBride, Auditor. H. C. Hawkins, Deputy Auditor. -"- Charles Green, Treasurer. -" , , " Andrew' Jackson, Recorder.' "r ' Saml. Strawdef, Prosecuting Attorney. ' John M. Tilden, Coroner. "' Samuel D. Harris, Surveyor. . Abel Fowlerv-Auctoneerv "" ' Andrew Jackson, Com'r of Insolvents. '' Joel H. Curtiss, - . Y -Moses A Birchard Commissioners. Ebenezer S. Harmon; ' .... '" Nelson Eggleston ' Andrew Jackson, ! Dr. J. G. Willis, ' Lyman tittle, p William Crane, Jacob Stough, Jr. School Examiners: DirecCs Co: Infirmary. Oricpn of the Panzer' Insnrance Company of . . ... Portage County. Richard J. Thompson, President.' -.v David M'Intosh, Vice President.--Henry A. Swif', Secretary, i " 1 Enos P. Brainerd, Treasurer. - " ' Directors -David M'Intosh, Eli Booth Alvah TJdall,- Moses Bundy, Jr., '. Samuel S. S)icer, Lewis E. Booth. i - - Officers Portage Co. Jgricnltaral Society. , , VVjlliam Coolmnn, President. -, 'Alvah Udall,- Vice President.'' William Frazer, Treasurer. , , . Alson A. llarrit. Secretary. . -. t : . . : Executive Committee. ' l" ... , Wallace Williumson, Betij. F. Pardep, Mar cus F Spelman, Pomerny Reed.- Austin Collins. Officers Portage Co. Br. State Bunk of Ohio. I R, E, Campbell, President. , , . . ,,.'! J. H. Ebbert, Cashier ' Mails Arrive at and Depart from Ravenna ' - ' " '': '.. . as follows: ' ' " ' ; ' Cleveland Rtail arrives at 12 . Daily - r , - do do departs at 4 p. m. do --j ... ' Pittsburgh do arrives at 4 p. si... do .. v T .. . do do departs at 12 m. do . , .. P. Warren do arrives at 12 M. -do ... ., -do do depnrtsat 12 M. do " Canton ' do arrives Tuesdaya&Ssturdnys 4 P.m. I t. do do departs Mondays & Fridays U a. k. . , Chardon do arrives WednesdoysikFridayf 4 r a. do dodepartTuesdays&.TliuradnysH A.m. . , Garrettsville departs, Mondays, Weilnesilnyi' and , Saturdays at 3 r. h. Arrives same days at 12 s. . :': . Dr. J; G. Willi. Viysician and Surgeon Streetsoro.Ol io. II. I'rail, M. I. ' ' PHYSICIAN AND SURGEON, Office in F. W. Seymour's building on the public .r .. squares nearly opposite the Comt lluuse. J no. Eloaisn Wcllnian, iU. ID. - ' PHYSICIAN AND SURGEON. ' " . Office on Main street, Ab. 109. ' : H. II. Wail, ffl. !H PHYSICIAN AMD SUHOEON. Ravkksv PoUtaok County, Ohio. . (7 Office at the old stnnd of Streator &. Il'ait. Kavenna, March 6. 1850. - v - Ds. Si. T. Spcllsnan, Dentist RavcLna Obio. 'Oliiee in Seymour's Block, over the Post Olfire. H. Birchard & J. W. Tyler, ATTY'S & COUNSELLORS AT LAW, Bare agreed to become jointly interested in their professional business in Portage county. . They may be consulted at iRavenna during the terms of court or at their offices In vacatinn. " Address in vacation Ujrehord SutHff, -Warren, or Birchard S Tyler, Franklin Mills, O. r ; Bierce & Jeltries. - r; Attorneys at Law. Office over Swift's Bros Store, oppo site the Court House. F. W. TAPPAN, : " Attorney & Codnskllo at Law, & So LiciToa in Chancery. r ' : Office nearly opposite the Prentiss House, Ravenna, O. Sahli Strawdeu O. P. Brows . i" ; Slrairdcr & Brown. Attorneys at Law Ravenna; Obio Office at the . v i?. ' Court House. El. II. Yl .Hard. - ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW, "''.,' AND 80LICITOR IN CHANCERY. Palmyra. Portage County, Ohio. . August 21, 1849. 3s - Andrew Jackson. . ; ATTORNEY & COUNSELLOR AT LAW -" -. ; f And Solicitor in Chancery. J SAVEXMA. onto. Collections and all other 'business entrusted to his i eae will receive faithful ami prompt attention. W . NDREW JACKSON, NOTARY PUBLIC. ' , Office in Seymour's Block. . .I. RASKET. E. B. TAYLCH -i - Ranney fc Taylor ..ATTORNEYS & Counsellors at Law and Solicitor in Chancery, Ravenna, Ohio. . . ttj" Office over Seymour's store. Iari:5s Lyman.' ... , , J T T O R NE Y A T L A W, Ravensa, Portage Co., Ohio. VT Office in Hood's Building, over S. A. & R. A. Gillett's store. Kavenna.Jnno 1,1849. - - - ' - tf-26 v7., .:. R. P. Spaldinff. ; . .. ; Attorney at Law Cleveland, Chio Office, in Par sons' Block Superior Street. ; D. SOMEKVILLE, TAILOB,' " HAS removed his shop a few doors west of the pnst - - office Kavenna, Ohio. - - . S A & K A Gilleflt " Dealers in Dry Goods, Groceries, Hardware, .. Iron, Nails, Glass, Ac, north side pub- -' '. He square, Ravenna, Ohio. FW Seymour Dealer hv Dry Goods, Beady Made Clothing Groceries, Hardware, Iron, Nails, Crockery, Boots, Shoes &c, north side pudlic square, -Bavenna, Ohio. Rowell & Rrolher. ; Dealers in Dry;Goods, Groceries, Hardware,. Crockery, Sec", Mason's Block, Main street, Bavenna, Ohio. , . II I. & R Da v Dealers in Fancy Dry Goods, Bonnets, Hats Caps, Boots and Shoes. Ready Made Clothing, ' Carpeting &c, at their New Store, Main St., tfast of Die Public Square. VOLUME' XXI I I-Snmbcr 51. lie nt. (Urencil & Co Dealers in Dry Goods, Groceries, Iron, Nails ... .Hardware. :? a &. .5 c i remiss . ? Dealer in Dry Goods. Groceries. Stoves Hard . .. ware. Iron, Nails, Glass, Sc., Brick Block, ... .- west sidepiMir: square! Itavenn,Ohio. E. T. Ilichardsoitv Dealer in English and American Hardware, Sad dle. Harness and Oaariage Trimmings, Iron, Nails. Steel, e Ac; nt the old stand of Mason 4fainerd, Ravenna Ohio. I GARRETT & BRIGGS, Agent jEtna Insurance Co., Uttca, JV. Y. . I'nderthe Post Office. Bank Street. Cleveland. HOOL RELIGIOUS,'! SCELLANtOUSL, AND STANDAgrWOSKS:S- ATIOMERt ftpdS. o. M THOMPSON'S PRISON LIFE and Re flections: Memoir of the Martyr, Torrey: Memoir of Lovejoy Memoir oXO. Scott: Henry Bibb's Nar rative: James Parker, the Fuel ive; Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass: Narrative of Henry Watson, a Fugitive Shire. J ' " . THE following Biographies, viz.Franklin'8, J. Q. Adams, J.-C Calhoun s, Andrew Jackson's. Madison and Monroe's, John Kandolph's Silas Wright's, Gen. LayfayeU's, Louis Kossuth's, Gen. Taylor's, James K. FoISi's&c.,&c. - , c . . . YOU ATT ON THE HORSE; Stable Econ omy; Colman's Agriculture; Farmer's Every Day Book: Rogers' Scientific Agriculture; Farmers and Emigrant Hand book ; Miss Beecber's Domestic Econ omy ; Practical Beceipt Book. 2- . 'I ANTI-SLAVERY PUBLICATIONS. A eood supply of the leading Ani-Slavery Works iss. ed from the Anti-Slavery Publication Office m New York, for sale at publisher's prices." ' ' " NEW MASONIC TRESTLE Board: The Free " Masons Monitor ; Odd Fellows'- Amulet ; - NationalTemperance Offering; Sons of Temperance Offering; The Chrystal Fount. , . NOTES, Explanatory and practicnl on the Book off Revelation, by Albert Barnes a new volume jus' published. - UNCLE TOM'S CABIN, or Life among- the Lowly, 100 000 Copies, "making 200 000 already pub lished and sold. A full assortment oftl.is astonishing work, constantly on 'hand, ., ... . THELIFEOF GEN. WINFIELDSCOTT by Edward D. Mansfield, a new edition, embracing hia campaign in Mexico, with an excellent likeness. " THE NAPOLEON DYNASTY giving'the origin and progress of the Bonopnrte Family, the best history of ihe times of Napoleon yet pub ilsbed. r - '" ',.. . ; .THE GOLDEN CHAIN, or Links "f Friendship, for Odd Fellows the world over. , Edited by Miss C. B. Porter. . "Three links amid the Golden fetters, t ." . . . That heart to heart entwine." ' . . HEARTS and HOMES, by Mrs. Eilis ; Fam ily Monitor, by Mrs. Ell s; The Heirof Wast-Way-land, a Tale by Mary Howitt.- - ' ' '- THE SCARLET LETTER; a Romance by Nathaniel Hawthorne. ' JAY"S MORNING and Evening Exercises; Berrian's Family Prayers. ' - - "" BIBLES, large and small, a good assortment. METHODIST HYMN BOOKS, large and small. '-:' ' " " " ' ' ''' -- -- F RE MONT'S EXPLORING Expedition. SIR JOHN FRANKLIN and the Arctic Re gions. V . . - , . MORAL, RELIGIOUS. Scientific Poetical, 'Biographical, Historical and Miscellaneous. Works, a great variety, o ; - t.'.. i ., ' '.. FOWLER'S "WORKS, bound, and in chenp pamphlet editions. : IO ; a Tale of the Olden Fane.hy K. Burton. GOLD PENS A good article. ' C LOVE RNOOK, by Alice Carey. ' : ' WOMAN'S FRIENDSHIP; a Story of Do mestic Life, by Grace Aguilar; The Vale of Cedars, or The Martyr, by (jrace Aguuar. WASHINGTON IRVING S WORKS; J. Fenimore Cooper's Works; Walter Coltons VNorKs. ECLECTIC DISPENSATORY ofUie Umtr ed States.- For sale at -;- . . -. Anzl 17, 1852. ? Afflicted Read. Philadelphia Mlcal IXonsc, ESTABLISAKI) 15 Y EARS AGO, El! nit. KIJillKHN, North-West Corner of Third and Union .streets; tween Spruce and t'ine streets, . a be- ' . . . PUlLAUHL.ftllA... .inrrpn mn nf ertpnsive ant! uninterrupted prnc. th ..'., in thia rit'v. have rendered Dr. K. the most expert ond successful prncti ione.-farand near, in ihe treatment all diseases of a private nature. . Persons aBlicied with ulcers up on the body, ihroat, or legs, : . l,.nt ,,r hnr.es. mercurial rheumatism. strictures, gravel, disease arising from youthful exces ses or impurities 01 me diooh, viuereuy K,.ma onfenlitad. are all treated with success. - He who places himself under the caro of Dr. K. may reliciouslv confit!e in his honor as a gentleman,, and confidently rely npon bis skill as a physician. tJke particular jvotice. Young men who liave Injured themselves by a cer tain practice indulged in a habit frequently learned from evil companions, or at school the effects of w hich nrn nirrlttlv fiOt .von wiien asleen. and destroy both I mind and bodv should nnnly immediately. Weakness nnd ennatiiutional dc hilitv. loss of muscular energy nhvbirnl lasiinde and eeneral prostration, irritability. and all nervous affections, indigestion, sluggishness of Ihe liver, and every disease in any way connected with the dtsnrder oi llio nro-crealivo functions, cured and full vigor restored.. READ!! J Y o n t h and Manhood. . A VIGOROUS LIFE. OK A PREMATURE DEATH. Kiukelin on Self-Preservation!! . - MY25t:F."ITS. - W This Ilook iust mihlished. is filled with useful inform ation, on the infirmities and diseases of the Generative Organs. It addresses itself alike to Youth, Manhood nnd Old Aee. and should bo read by all. : . .- The value, advice and impressive warning it gives, will prevent years of misery anu sunenng, ana savi annually thousands of lives. . Parents by reading it. will leara how to prevent th ,t-.,.n..tiin f llipir liildren. t ntiiijii.a of as cents, enclosed in a letter ad- ,i...J-J m lir, Kinkfflin. norih-west corner of Third und Union streets, between Spruce nnd Pine, Phila delphia, will ensure a book, under envelope, per return of mail. .. Persons at ft distance may atictress ur. r.. oj ienr, (post-paid) and be cured at home. nrmtininu directions. &e.. fbrwarded by sending a remittance,- and put up secure from damage or curiosity. : - - ' : . n...t ...i!. 1Va:.Aironta. Pedlars. Canvassers, and :K3 all others supplied with the above work, at very low rains. . .-. ' . . . Mnv24. 1RS2. - llfiS-ly THE best and largest assortment of Pamphlet Literature, entertaining and unexceptionable in tone and influence, embracing wuras irom ino pni a.o, Artnur, sirsi uroy,. anss ricRenug. mm. . Mownt. Charles l.evernnd other distinguished writer, cver-otrrred in ibis market, may bo tound at Oct. 27. Hall's IMi Sronis. IRON AND NAILS AT lOW 3? ax CSS. LARGE stock for sale in a large or Small way at wholesale prices for Ready Pay. KENT, GRENELL & Co. Franklin, June 8, 1852. TEA The boat iu the county you will find at tfEYMn'u&'s, uvvij ,i tt - it (Ml IBl A Family Sevspaptr, Betstcd lo Central Intelligence, Misttllaneous Beading, and lie Eights of Ball. ' For the Ohio Star. Smooth Things. " And they said, ' Speak unto us smooth things' " A people, long restlessly sitting . .... - - "i ' With consciences under a chain; Grown weary, at last; of submitting. Once vowed to be freemen again, But now they have grounded their weapons, While each to his manacle clings: Do you marvel my friends, how it happens? Their rulers have told them -' smooth things! A Church, in her just indignation! Rose up, at a blasphemous Law; And resolved, from unholy relation With the compact of sin. to withdraw. ' But now, with hands folded in meekness, "Peace, peace," is the song that she sings; Why endeth her real thus in weakness ? Her preachers have spoken "smooth things!" Not thus the disciples of Jesus May bow when the wrong doer nods; " Give to Cs3sar fee things which are Caesar's," But give not rAe send, which is God's! Never duty with conscience can vary. Nor Peace over Wrong fold her wings; -Be wary, oh brothers, be wary, " Lest ye barter God's truth for " smooth tldngs." Edinburgh, Nov. 1852. - Ecncvoleuce and Gratitude. . . . A TRUE STORY It was a raw bleak night; the rain was falling fast, while the wind blew in violent gusts. A Portsmouth night-conch Btopped at the pricipal inn of the town to change horses. The cold and wearied travellers alighted for a few minutes to en joy the comfort of a blazing fire, as well aa to take refreshments. "Will you give a poor fellow a night's shelter in yaur hay-loft?" asked a weather beaten sailor, ad dressing one of the ostlers who was fastening the harness. - ' . ' - 'No, not to such as you," answered the man; yon hud beter make the bett of yonr way off, or you'll get ' more than you look for," if yon prowl about here any longer. ' Perhaps, young man', replied the tar, 'yon may one day be sent adrift upon the world, without a penny to keep 'your head above water; and as to honesty I know better than to take what is not my own if I had not a shoe to my fuot.' ' - - - I wouldn't trust yon farther than I could ?ee you,' s?iid the ostler, 'and if you don't be off, I'll make you.' ' ' ' ' " ' - Poor Jack was turning away, hungry snd footsore when he was tapped on the shoulder by a lad who acted as stable boy. 'If you were to go down the the road to the first little shop you .come to,' he said, 'Widow Smith would, I dare say, let you sleep in her wood house; she is a good old creature, and is'nlwnys ready to help any one in distress.' 'Thnnk you, thank you,' said the sailor. These few words caused a revulsion of feeling in the breasts of the foi lorn "stranger; they told him tl'Bt there still were hearts in which kindness flowed. ' ' ' ' - - ' John p Willis, on coming ashore, had been robbed of his little all, a thing of no uncommon occurrence, anfl he was now compelled to beg his way to Lon don. HeS deeply felt the rebuffs ho frequently mi;t with. The prevalence of imposition fr equent ly Tenders it hard for those who are realy in need to getholp, for their truthfulness is ofien questioned "Jack followed the directions given him, but he found the shop, closed, He felt that it was an unseasonable hour; still the favorable account that he had recicved of its owner, encouraged him to ap at the door. His summons was answered by the oithy dame- who, having listened compassionately o his tail of sufuiings, bade him enter and share her frugal ineaU . '. .... . ... 1 tie tar entertainea nia benevolent nostess wun a recital of theishiiiwrecks he had witnessed, and the narrow escapes he had himself bad And she piously diroc'ieJsJJjis mind to the good Providence which had predeiwed him to the present hour, and ie Saivior who hail died to redeem him. The repast ovi-r, the widow placed some cleau dry tt aw in one corner of a shed attached to her dwelling, and with a . thankful heart the wearied traveler ; retched hiroself upon it, aod slept as soundly as if on a bed of down. Befote continuing hij journey in the morning, Jack looked in to thank the good woman for the shelter the had given him; he found, however, a warm meal awaiting him. Having partaken of it, ccepted a few cents to help him on his way, ha eparted with a hearty benediction from his hos tess.:- Ten years, and the little incident here recorded had long escaped the memory of all save one.ofthe parties concerned. Ten years had wrofight may changes in the town and most of the inhhbitarjts utthey had glided gectly;over the head ol Widow; Smith. The only alteration perceptible in ner was that her hair had become more sdvery, and her form was now slightly bent. She still. contin ued her labors of love; and though her means were very limited, she was looked upon as the friend and neighbor of all who were sick, or in want.- One morning a large official looking let'er was put into Mrs. Smith's hand by the postman. Its purpott was to beg her attendance ia London on the following day, when the writer said she would receive gratifying intelligence'Which it was wished tocommuiibate to herself personally. Much consulting and gossiping"ehsued. One of her neigbhors thought ii'o hoax, ti p'ay the old lady, a trick, anothe Er.id it would be 1 ighly imprudent for a womiwnHDf her years to take such a journey, especially to trusl herself alone in such a wicked place as London: while o third was quite sure that the wri'er had some evil design. It did appear a formidable undertaking to one who had never ftrnyed ten miles from her native place. The widow's credulity had often been imposed upon, yet she would believe any thing but that any , one would intentionally deceive or wrong her, , She had great con fidence, too, in the protecting providence of God, whom she served in humble dependence on His grace in Christ, and therefore felt no fear in complying with the . request in the letter. Wherefore, notwithstanding the ridicule of some, and the remonstrance of others Ihe good damesiarted by the first coach which pnssed through'on the morrow, and reached London in lime to meet the appointment. The address given her was at an inn, nnd on arriving there she was immediately ushered into a private apartment, where two respectable looking men were waiting to receive her. The widow's surprise waa increased when one of them accoBted her with the familiar phrase, If a RxlVENNA, WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 24, How do you d mother? Don't you remember me, my worthy!' added "hey in answer lo her half frightened, inquiring glance. '1 am Jack Willis, ihe sailor you housed and fed ten years ago, when -he had neither money nor friends, I am now cut ttin of a merchantman; and this gettleman,' miring to his companion, 'wil', in my njme, do the needful .o set'le an annuhy of fi'ty dollars npon you as proof vf my grai udo for your kindness, and especially for your good advice, which 1 hope, by God's mercy, led me to think of Christ, and trust ia bim for su!- vauHi-' f The widow, unable to give) utterance to the emotion of her swelling heart, burst into tears. Widow Smith returned to her cottage home, thankful lo God lor his blessing on her humble efforts to ben fit a fellow creut ire in body and soul and for his bountiful care for her,nnd deligh ed that shi had now incresed means of useful ness; and never after did site li-ten to n tale of B'ifFdring without thinking of poor Jack Willi-. London Tract Magazine. . . Reply of Henry Ward Becclior To he Ulrietures of the .Veto York Observer, upon the allusion made in " Uncle Tom's Cabin " to the Rev. Joel Pa: her. Concluded. I enclosed the correspondence to Mrs. Stowe, and wrote the following note to accompany it, which note is certainly not reverent as it should be, but it shows the honorable intentions I entertained towards Dr. Parker After criticising her card, 1st as attempting to do too many thing ; 2.1, as on that account failing to produce the impression which ehe desired, 1 proceeded to say 3. When any apology is made before the pub lic, it ought to be so explicit as at once to gain, for the maker the eredit of honesty, frankness, and honor; nnd then, if afterwards you have aught to say, it will be kindly taken. Nevertheless, I took it to Joel. He made wry faces. Wa tinkered a little, as vou will see. and in this shape he agreed to let it go. But I felt bad about it. I said to him, " Mr. Parker, I don't like the whole thing. If you will give me pen and ink, and leave me alone, I will write one to my mind." So I wrote the enclosed, i. e. two letters as from bim, and one as from y-u. . I am satisfied that these will make a good impression. You will see that you do not commit yourself as to whether he ever paid, in any oilier contro versy, this thing. . You express a judgment made up upon documents presented, uesides, 1 am quite satisfied that he has been misrepresented in that regard. That being the case, I desire much an unequivocal statement on that poiot. Then, the statement of the way in which you got hold of the thing will have force, both to exculpate you, and to show that he brought the infliction on his own bead. . f If you approve this, send a copy in your hand writing to Wm. Harned,' A. S. Rooms, 43 Beck- ninn street, New York, and he -will gee to its in serttoo in Tribune, Er,, Itidapen Jont. Truly yotrrsy - - H. W. B. I leave for Indiana Monduy. This letter is decisive of my feelings and inten tions towards Dr. Parker, and my only hesitation about publishing it is, lest it should seem that I was too severe with Mrs. Stowe. But our disa greement was never for a moment as to the fact of public reparation, nor as to tohat should be that re paration ; but simply as to how' much or how little collateral explanation had better be given. Mrs Stowe was never inclined, aa Dr. Parker says. "to insist upoa adding to the concessions other matter relating to what she considered my position in respect to the subject of blavery." All that Mrs. Stowe wished on this point was to show ex actly what Dr. Parker's position and argument bud been on the subject of slavery,. in the original controversy,' Tioru which the language quoted in her book w a supposed to be derived ; and where the drift of his argument gave a very different con struction to his words fiom what they would have, etanding alone. Mrs. Stowe had no wish to define his general belief, or his personal relutious to slu- very. And her difficulty-was, that Dr. Parker thought she ought, while she thought she ousdit not to take 6aie to hercelf.iu any card to be published. A third ern'mrrussnifitnd the only other, was Aotr, frankly,to retract in" regard to the language U3ed in the controversy, loitlwut positively declar ing, what she would not declare, that Dr. Parker had never used such language aa that attributed to him. Her letter is explicit on that subject. Here my agency in this transaction is closed ; I left for the West. On my way borne, finding the correspondence in a copy of the Tribune, in Cincinnati, I then firat learned Mrs Stowe's decis ion and action in this mutter. On reaching Brook lyn, i cannot tell whether amazement or indigna tion was the strongest, on reading tho following letter from Dr. Parker to Pruf. Stowe, which had boen sent to me by Mrs. Stowe. A Dr. Parker to Prof. Stowe. New York, June 30, 1852. Mr Deab Sir : Are you aware of the fact that the letters published in the Tribune and Indepen dent as purporting to have boen written by myself, were not written, nor signed, nor sanctioned by me? They were drawn up by the Rev. H. W, Beecher, and when read by me I expressed the idea that they might, wilh some vindication, lead to Ihe settlement of the difficulty. I proposed that Mr. Beecher should show them to my counsel, Mr. Butler, and that thoy should be made the sub ject of a future consider.ttion. . This was the underslaouing wnen we separated I mean Mr. Beecher and myself. I have heard nothing from Mr. Beecher or Mrs. Stowe since, till, to my astonishment, I learned that these let ters had been published without modification, with out my knowledge or consent. I am not aware whetner mr. ceecner saw my counsel or not. I have maao repeated enorts to see Mr. Butler aince my return, for I have been absent. But he has been out of town, and I have as yet learned nothing from him. 7 It has appeared to me unwise to come out and deny publicly the authorship of the letters ascrib ed to me. They may have got to the press by some mistake of a third person to whom they may have been intrusted, for I cannot yet believe Unit either Mr. Beecher or Mrs. Stowe would inten tionally authorize their publication, and I prefer that Mrs. Stowe should have the privilege of ex plaining the mistake, rather than she should appear to have done a thing so extraordinary as to publish letters over my name without either my signature or consenb 18-52. It has seemed to me, all along, that it would I have been well fur you to have come and seen me about this business. I cannot consent to stand be- 1 lore the public as one soliciting it as a favor from Mrs. Stowe to set me right before the public. I wish her to set herself right in respect to what she has done in relation to me. I am -not impatient. I allow time. . But it is not a matter for comprom ise, as it there, were wrong on both sides. 1 do not wish to afflict Mrs. Stowe, and would not knowingly consent to her doing anything, on my account, that would not be, under the circumstan ces, the very best thing for her character and her reputation as a Christian woman. Had you not better come on aod see me I I have, had my full share of trouble about the business, aod in my earnestness to settle the matter amicably, I have borne much more than my friende thiuk I ought to have done. I have no doubt that you and 1 could settle the whole affair, by a conference of an bour or two, and I quite agree with you that it would be a great shame that we should have any sort of pub lic conflict in relation to it. With- great respect, youis, truly,'. ":- - --. - - Joel Parker.. Rev. C. E. Stowe, D. D. . About this time Dr. Parker had given his ver sion of this mutter to Mr. Converse, editor of the Christian Observer, Phdadelphia, and in the lost number oi that paper, Oct. 2J, 1852, the following editoriul account is given : Mrs. Stove and Dr. Parker. Some months since, our attention was called to a misrepresentation of Dr. Parker's language and sentiments in one of the foot notes of " Uncle Tom's Cabin." At the same time we were toJ that Dr. P. had written to Mrs. S., requesting her to retract the mis-statement. We were also ad vised that Mrs. S. was not disposed to make the correction required nnd that Dr. P. put the nut ter into the hands of an able counsel for adjust ment. About the last of June, a correspondence appeared in some of our exchange papers purport ing to be copies of letters between Dr. P. and Mrs. S., amicably settling the difficulty.' We read the letters with amazement! We were surprised that Dr. P. should permit Mrs. S. or any one ' to set" him " right before the public" in the style of Mrs. S.'s letters, or that he should ever ask to be "allowtd" to publish such a letter! ' Meeting with Dr. P. shortly after, he assured us, in answer to some inquiry, that these letters were forger- ies ! that he neither wrote them, nor signed them, nor consented to their publication; and that Mr. Beecher had caused them to be published without his consent ! " Why, then, do you not expose the forgery ? we asked. Dr. P. replied, in substance, that the exposure would be discreditable or scandalous to the ministry and that he wished to avoid any thing that might be the occasion of reproach to the ministry or religion. It was then our intention to publish nothing about the matter; but as it is now spread abroad, we think it due to those concerned to state the facts contained in this article. , The italics and capitalization are the Christian Observer's. " On the same day that Dr. Parker wrote to Pro fessor S;ove, as above, he wrote. to my venerable father, Dr. Lymaa Beecher, of Boston : and the cool leci'al to a father of his son's agency in transaction which he pronounces a forgeet, must forever stand as a model. Dr. Parker to Dr. Lyman Beecher. New York, June 30, 1352. Rev. asd Dear Sib : Your very kind letter came duly to hand, I delayed responding to it, because I hoped in a short time to be able to con. gratulate you and myself, and all concerned, by saying that the whole difficulty was settled. But I am afraid now it is further off than ever. - . The publication of these letters was very ex traordinary. Still, I hope it can be explained. I have written Dr. Stowe fully to day. You will probably see the letter. ' I have no doubt, if I could see him or yourself one hour, the whole affair could be adjusted. I appreciate all you say of my rights and charac ter being dear to you.' I Irust you most confident ly, and do not wish to occasion you a single sen sation of discomfort, 1 suppose you have seen the letters the correspondence published in- The Tribune and The Independent. You could not, of course, have known before hand, that they were drawn up by your son, H. AV. Beecher, and that they were without my signature, as a mere form of negotiation, to be revised. I never could have consented to their publica tion, till they were modified. How they came to be published, I do not know. I hope and trust that it was not intentional; that it resulted from some mistake of a third party, to whom they may have been intrusted for conference with me, and such modifications as Mrs. Stowe nnd myself might mutually consent to. If so, Mrs. Stowe ought to know immediately that no such person ever came to me. I have no-doubt that a full conference either with yourself or Professor Stowe would set every thing right. Yours, affectionately, Joel Parker. In this congeries of letters, was one one other of July 31, to the New York Observer, and which was published in that paper Sept. 30, 1852. Dr. Parker toJVeu York Observer. New York, Jtjf 31, 1852 Mr Dear Sir : On returning frtyji he country tins atternoon, l louna your note oi tue o.n nisi. on my table. The correspondence to which you refer, purporting to be a correspondence between myself and Mrs. H. B. Stowe, was drawn op by Rev. H. W. Beecher, as a proposed basis of set Iliac the difficulties between myself and Mrs, Stowe. That is to say, Mr. Beecher proposed that we should, both Mrs. Stowe and myself, adopt theso letters as ours. I agreed o have it under advisement, and encouraged the expectation that wifft some modification, we might settle the whole matter by $ome such method. Mr. Beecher took the paper wliich Mrsi Stowe had not aeenj and to which neither of us had affixed our signatures, and I heard nothing further of .the matter till, to my utter amazement, the letters, were published, with the names ofthe parties affixed. -.Whether they were the same or not, I do not 'know J I had no copy. ' 1 presume they were nearly, the same, it not in every word. But those ascribed 'to me were never adopted by mei and I never could have been induced to sign them as. they were, norto aooept of Mrs. Stowe's as saiiafabtory. Mrs. Stowe refused evenloanswer my letters till I had written her the third time. Then 1 ernf ployed my counsel, and resolved to commence a suit for libel. Before she knew my purpose, she wrote a note in a defiaut tone, and affirmed that her conviction, derived from fasts and documents, Whole Nnmber 119-5 and the testimony of living witnesses, was that such an issue would prove fur more unfortunate for me than for hurKpIF. After she had learned that I had emnloved Mr. Benjamin F. Butler as my counsel, she addressed a note to me in a milder tone, ond this leu to an interview, in which she admitted that she had im puted to me words and sentiments which 1 had not put forth. She never has shown herself wilt ing to make a simple reparation of the wrong as it is, and justifies herself by saying the language was imputed to me in American journals," and not denied by me, when she knows that they were abolition newspapers, which I did not suppose were believed in this country, where their chaimcter was known. Yours, trulv. J. Parker. In reply to Dr. Parker's letter to Professor Stowe, Mrs. Stowe wrote this, the last of her let ters iu this most painful and extraordinary histoty. Jlfra. Stowe's closing letter to DrS Parker: Brunswick, July 2, 1852. ' Dear Sir : As your lelter addressed to my bus- band is one that I can answer better than he. I shall now reply to i"by stating fo you, briefly, ah I know ot the matter under consideration. The card which I sent to my brother contained what 1 then supposed and do still suppose to be a fuirand justexposition of the whole state of the case. I received a letter in reply, from my brother, in which he stated that he had shown that card to you; that you and he had together variously amend ed and altered it in regard to expression, until you were brought to some degree of unanimity upon it. tviy orotlier then went on to say, that he said to you" Mr. Parker, the wording of this does not exactly please me, and I think if you will give me uoeny io araw up a torm, I can produce one that will give satisfaction to both sides." " Ha went on to say, that he now sent me this form, which, if I was willing- to accede to and adopt as my language, I was to copy with my own handwriting, and send to the care of Mr. William Harned.who would see to its insertion in the Era, Tribune, and Inde pendent. ' ' ' i was oi tne opinion, at the time, that the "card" which I had sent was a more just and fair expose of the subject, and I shuuld have much preferred ita publication. But I thought that if ynu were willing to consent to this adjustment, I ought to be willing nlso, and upon consideration I came to the conclusion that it was Ihe best expression which could be given. In it you wore represented as acting with the courtesy and dignity which becomes a Christian man of honor, and I expressed what I sincerely feel a pleasure in repairing any unintentional in justice which I might have done you.' Nothing could have been more surprising than the receipt of yonr letter. ' You will perceive at once that the case lies between you and my broth er Henry, who, judging from the tone of his letter to me, considered himself to be acting with al' kindness, fairness, and good faith, as. he always does acC I think he will be equally surprised with myself to learn that you do not consider your self to have assented to these letters My dear sir, there are some few things inJhis matter, that you kr.-ow .perfectly well, for 1 know tnat you were satisfied of them at the time we had our interview. In the first place, that the remark, as published, was published io no personal unkind ness whatever; that it was published as a senti ment to be replied to In it dramatic argument, for everybody knows that that is the character of the article. And your name was given, simply as thfl name ot a leading man who was known to have puDiicly advanced that sentiment. , I had no possi ble means of knowing that the sentiment was not yours, and the very at ranee's) evidence for believ ing mat it was, since yon tod allowed it in silence to become a historical document. Y"ou know, and I know, that you have used lansungn whieh,- when placed side by side with whet I quoted, is such that Dot one man in ten can be made to see any difference. I know this, because I have tried earnestly and sincerely to explain to sensible men What you did mean by the language which vou admit that you used, and it has failed to produce any impression on them except this that it is a esmtical construction of language, by which either of two opposite assertions can be claimed as the writer's sentiments according to emergencies. : 1 can still publish the facts of the case just as I wrote them first, whnt you did nof say ; second, what you did say ; third, the evidence that you knew the construction which the world waa putting upon your language, and yet that you did not con tradict it. But I certainly think that the whole matter is in a more creditable form to you now, than if I should 66 so. I have done what I consider to be perfectly honorable and fair to remove an imputation for which you have given too much occasion. ... You know perfectly well, Mr. Parker, for I told yon f.nnk'y that I did not consider myself to have acted wrong in this matter, but simply to have fallen into a mistake, which your siience rendered unavoidable, ond I consider myself to have said all that you can possibly expect from me under the circumstances. When my brother returns, which will be soon, you will probably discuss fairly with him whatever strikes you as objectionable in his part of the proceeding. Yours, very truly, , R9v. Mr. Parker. . H. B. Stowk. And now it is not to be concealed that Dr. Par ker and I stand before the public at issue, upon a question of personal vernciry. And those who do not fall upon the convenient theory of a mutval misunderstanding, must determine the issue by the pei sonnl character of the parties. But so odious a necessity as this, is somewhat alleviated by some considerations to which I call attention. 1. When Dr. Parker avers that he agreed to have the latters "under advisement, and encour aged the expectation that with some modification, we might settle tho matter by some such method," (see letter of July 31, to New York Observer,) he has fatally entrapped himself. For I now have it in my power to show that such statements were morally impossible. A train of events, beginning with Dr. Parker s counsel, and not with us, had led to several private interviews; had satisfied Mrs. Stowe of her error; had settled her determination to make a public, re paration. She and Dr. Parker could not agree as to the form. She went to New Haven to rest, and there calmly to review the Whole ground, and settle with harself what statement she would make. She sent that statement; declared it to be an ulti matum; gave me liberty to "change the phraseolo gy, but not the spirit of the thing; and declares: "I am well pleased with it it is all! will do if he won't have this, I will publish it and he may do what he likoa." Now, let it be considered wheth er this is the language (or the letter which I wrote afterward) of persona who feared a suit, who were " negotiating to avoid one, or whether negocialion of, any Sort Was my errand to Dr. Parker. , 1 was sent to read him a card that was to bet ' published whether he liked it or not, and whleb was to be changed only as to phraseology. 1 wesr- not sent to ask him whether her would take socb and such an apology, in lieu of $20,000 damages; Instead; I was to say, "This is to be substantially" published,- at any rate; but we wish to place yon a far as we Can, without compromising our ownf sense of what hi right for us to do; - At my sag gestion and his urgent, request, a substitute was written" in Epistolary form. Now Dr. Parker does? not Say that he asked time to consider which of the two papers ho bad rather have published (nay he has withheld in any letter lhat there was a card at all, and he has never once' mentioned, in either of the four letters, that the letters were written itf -his own study, doling a friendly conference be tween us,) but he Bays that he promised to take) these letters under adoisement. This statement; stamps his story with inveracity. For I -did not come to ask for a settlement. I came to make a card which was , to be published at any.ratej aa agreeable to him as could be, consistently, with itst substantial atermdnts. "Had. he therefore' mads the remark whioh he says, or any remark of th same krad, my - answer must have been r Dr'j Parker,-1 did not ask you whether you would Con sent to have these published, but simply whether you had rethet I should ptsbUsh Mrs. Stowe's apol- - Ofrv. in thft nhnntf r,r tf.la ,n .Via ctinnA nf this corresji n len e? : ..'-. - " 2. Aside from the intrinsic evidence, there bap- pens to be an extrinsic circumstance bearing upon it. I was on the eve of a visit to Indiana. To me' had been committed by Mrs. Stowe the final dis position of this affair.- - Whatever I did, must bei done at once. Is it to be supposed that I should have beer nut off to an uonpoiritl and indefinite settlement, xhl n' t notice the fact; or reply to Dr; Parker that such a thing was impossible, that I had no time for further tonference 1 ' , : i The public Will require a word of explanation as to my reason for gcing thence to Mr. Butler. When Mr.- Bat 16 r was applied to to take tins case, and had seen the documentary evidence, such, was his confidence in Mrs. Stnwe's integrity and Chris tian honor', snM such was his conviction that there) was evidence that she had misrepresented Dr. F. tbat he Was" confident that a private settlement might be had, if Mrs. Stowe could be Snt rightly' approached?. ' 1 htfd understood,' at toy ictervieWf with Mr. Barney, that! when Dr. Parker applied for counsel1, Mr. Butler made it the condition of hi undertaking the case, that Paiker should take no steps ia this matter without first consulting him.i--.v ' I may Have beefi' slightly inaccurate as to the1 point; but, whether 1 was or not, that too my un dorstanding.- When Dr. Parker said that he was satisfied with the correspondence provided hist counsel assented, I saw the reason, and 1 instant! said, then I will go immediately to Mr. Butler. It was not to obtain any authority from him for nnblishing- the letters, nor to obtain1 his Agreement I... l- 1 Z ..... r. : 1, ... tMrrifllia TT- Ta- lllali 111 WUUIU UUb U!lHg DUIl, UU, IU UUbt Jt . . W. kei's approval of the le:tars effectual, by obtaining his counsel's consent for him to act in this, in the settlernent of the matter, if he wished." .-, :v 3; But there is another suggestion which wilf satisfy a business man that Dr. Purker's story is! intrinsically absurd.' r His statement is, that he had obtained counsel to b I ig suit for $20,000 damages; that I roROEn" letters as a settlement of that Suit, and published them in the' daily papers without his knowledge or consent! And al this was done also without ob- taining a written relinquishment of clain foe dam ages, should he yet choose to bring su'iu Didmor tal man ever before dream of a published forgery as a pacification of an angry li.igat'oc; or of a Cr ger publ'-shing his act, so that the- aggrieved party, would infallibly find it- out. the next morning; and doing it in a way that U!tho door opes to the -very suit which he is snppotjrto have dreaded; and not only left it open to him, but heaped by such preTO cation, fresh fuel upon his zeal 89 a prosecutor Had I done such a crazy deed, I engbt not tdhave) been blamed, but sent to a lunatic atyVnro. And ' anv norsnn that will believe thai a minister of ths Gospel, in circumstances the most prosperous, -would imperil his reputation and every interes-irj life, upon such a bore-fated folly as that, ought tC doubt his own sanity. But I am ashamed to rea son on such a matter.' . . , The N. Y. Observer has chosen Hamao for its' model, and built a gallows to hang me upon. : The Lord has been pleased to deal with me as he dial with Mofdecfiij and 1 am pained to see the Obser ver swing in the" gibbet reserved for me;- " ' '' A. Btit I have 'not yet done; There is now an account which the .public have to settle with the' guilty parties Who' have dragged from honorable' privacy tl hi affair, at n brought a shame and. re-' proach to Christianity by publishing ik I wash my han-l? tff blame'. ' . .' What was the state of things when Dr. Parkiir brought this matter to the publio ear? Was he) suffering in ruputntion? His name had been eras- i r . a. , , f . . . ea irom ine noos; lurs. otavye uaa conterreu ami cably with him as to rt publio reparation-, all the grievances of which the Observer makes so much, v'174. Mrs. Stowe's obstinate silence, had been ex plained and .dropped; an apology had appeared id the publio prints, which had struck the public mind as most christian and satisfactory; and by his own! showing, there was but thi3T5bjection thst ha had not sig ed the letters of prefix or suffix, which were at any rate but the machinery of introducing the main thing, Mrs. Stowe's retracli n. . Dr. Parker knew too, that in so far as Mrs. .Stowe was con cerned, she had acted most innocently and in good faith, and that if any one was to blame, I was the man; and that she had acted honorably, not only, but bad yielded her judgment, and consented for whnt she supposed was his wish, and taken these) letters instead of her own card. Now, admitting the gross construction put npon- my conduct, did that justify Dr. Parker, as a man of honor, in rip ping up and publishing to the world on ex parte statement of all the grievances ha had had- with Mrs. Stowe, and which, in so far as it lay in her power, she had settled! N Dr. Parker in thia thing stands before the public as a man-who negociates rrrivalclu with Mrs. Stowe, until he had obtained from her a publio concession of his injuries. and then, availing himself of an informality, turns about and exposes her to obloquy and re proach, by publishing a garbled statement of, alt these grievances which her publio retrnctioa was . procured to heal ! - . ' - 5. Conclusion. - When the New i ork Observe represents Dr. Parker as offering evidence to Mrs. Stowe, in the first instance, to satisfy her that she was In error. it is shown that it stated an Untruth; when it de clares that Mrs. S. "took no aotioe of his letter, it is proved to have stated an untruth, when it says that she deigned no reply to his second letter, , it 'states an nntrutht when it deolares that Mrs, S. was induced only by fear of a libel suit to coma to terms, it states an untruth; when. Dr. Parker, io his lelter to the Observerintimates the same thing, he brings himself into conflict with his own state raent respecting the-same thing, given lit his letter to Prof. Stowe. When Joel Parker and,, the N. Y. Observer state that the published letters were not written by Dr. Parker, nor signed by XT. t s ker.lhey do at length state a truth; but when they" state they were not approved by him with tbe un demanding that they were to be published, they state aa tofatruth. When they both neglect to ey a word of Mrs. Stowe's card; of the orisih of the-