Newspaper Page Text
eronatUuUonal ZH^Cg. SATURDAY MOUNINU, APRIL 4, 182D. ~ .— i =■■;.-■- r-riTi • i-i-.-r- , --- IffUliamsbitrg t\tigrcs*.—We extract from tho ‘Plough-Boy, u sketch* of the proceedings of the Wil liamsburg Congress—a body which lately assembled In that ancient City, dep uted by some two cr threi; hundred citizens of tin's tNoat&rial Didtrici, kindly to do tbrtfcej><?02>/e of the DU tlict, what the?* bene volently feared the said ponple *Vcre incompetent to do for themselves—namely, seleo,' suitable persons noon whom t^iey should bestow tli votes for the CbnvcntiOu. This labor of love will V-'iibtlcss be properly appreciated bribe good y -ople Scna tpriul District, and the rccmani*:^lations muds by the Williamsburg Convention, received with the grati tude, required by the jrntuitoui? klucuevs of the mo tive. ■Sqbjo drenm^tam** t in tbefo proceedings will ar rest tho curiosity of f! •**.■ reader from their unexplained contradiction. Eor example, wc find Ur. Sheppard of Henrico, saying, * Hint tho 2">elegnlrt7« from Rich taoad and Henrico, tr. 1 come down prepared to sup port any two gentler k ;; brought forward by the deno tation below—Judge f Vmple and TJr. Nicholas alone exempted—wboaft tb- *• wed kn°w their constituents would not support, -tud hi. opposition to whom, they considered Oicioselv^s, under any possible circum stances, ► -Hind to vote.” I'no wobld think that this was “g* ,jncr the whole hog*’—that a pledge of this 6ort v ust necessarily preclude any change of opinion, at y ast on tho sudden. Nevertheless, vve find Hie <3# legation from Henrico, after the? first ballot, vntlvg f . cry shot for Ur. Nicholas, ^r.kdln they well knew tltcir constituents would not support,” and the deler gfttion from Richmond in due-time packing in! Ve afily, we think this stands In need of some explanation. Y/e know of no other Instance on record, of so sud-^ upn onu radical a revolution m opinion and pilrpogjc! We a-sk the attention of tlw> friends of reform, to tire explanation given by Cbl. ATcCaadUsh, of tire ^pinions of Judgo Semple, rurd let them, C.v uni, disce tyltzie*. Let them understand of what this Caucus at Ayillinmsburg was mainly composed—of inveterate loos of all change- Let them be assured that there dm men struggling- for themselves to get into Con vention, and struggled to be Vrotghtln by others, for the purpose of locJclng the wheels—for the purpose of Strangling all reform, though the people in a voice of thunder, have said there shaUbe reform, rtnd thorough • -Tf/hrnx. "Who after the exhibition of those proceedings at illiumsburg, is wiser than he was before? Where i’s the understanding instructed, or the concert estab lished? Are the free men of the H^ftrict to resign tiuiir judgments and free will, into the keeping of the gentlemen who composed tins Caucus? Ought the people to give up this man, or take Up that, because they have kindly undertaken to nominate particular persons for whom they are invited to vote? Is is not orobablo that the people of Henrico, know as well fur to vote, as Mr. Adams and *\ir. Sheppard > :Sow for them, highly respectable find intelligent tfs i hose gentlemen are? the XVillifOmhurg Flmigh-Htg (*/'•!pint 1. “LET THE PEOPLE ALOA’E.” ,2 significant lesson. Having in several of our last papers given a largo portion o'J'our column* to the expression of cur own t^Hlinv^ntaand to the insertion of a number of pieces frorn different quartrars, relative to the proposed merging at Williamsburg On Friday last., (27 March,) f<V select, for the ennotmence of the Freeholders of 'd\ir Senatorial district, the four parsons whom thev ought to vote for, . i members of the coming Con vention—our Readers have seen how contrary it, wau to the general sense of tho people, that any suth thing should be done. Notwithstanding these plain “signs of the times,” however, nnd in desnit.e of the frowns and disapprobation of the. people, visi bly, audibly declared; a meeting, such ns it was, did take plHCe. The Gentlemen appointed, or rather samo of them, did really convene; and with resolution worthy of a better cau.~c, under all the discourage rnyats of the case, (only one. delegate attending from I Richmond; and from New Kent, Elizabeth ° City,! and m en Williaurshurg itself, none at all!) they pro deeded lo make an effort to carry' their purpose into cifect. What the exact, course oftheir deliberations and doings wan, we shall with great pleasure an- 1 ununce t.otbc public, as soon as we may receive an ! Official statement of their organization.' delate, rfts-1 solves, and final decree. In the mean time, nur Readcrw, atlmrno nnd abroad, may be assured that’ there never was a more complete abortion—a more tignificant lesson, fo all stich contrivers as have the! vanity to wish, and tins boldness to attempt, to die- j fate or direct, the choice of the people in matter? of; such high and permanent importance os the framing ! of the future constitution of Virginia. We wish not to be misunderstood in those remarks, j We do not intend the h*ast disrespect to any indi vidual of the meeting to which allusion is made. On tho contrary we acknowledge the members epfcpo stog it,- tn be gentlemen of the highest respectability. 1 Bnt we think they are radically mistaken in the means 1 of advomting the welfare ami interest, of the State:1 $n<Mn the pmdc of doing honour to the intellects otM the Freeh Alder* of the District—and on tliCi'egrounds ^ V'C bare captured them. roMMt;r,-fc,AT'rp, Cdn^enlinp Proceedings.—On Friday last, fire TYUi March, deputations from several portions of the third j senatorial disti let, accordiugto previous appointment, injet in convention at this place. Some of the dele gates from nbe ve, reached town on Thursday eve-. Tung, nnd on Friday about twelve o’clock, the follow in'* gontlrmri assembled at the court house. t From the. c ty oP Richmond, Col. (ieoTgt* M. Car ilngton. Menrico Ccruuty, Bflnjamin Shepherd and Ricbaid Adams. Charles Citw county, John B. Christian, James TJ. Roane, John Mingo, aad I>o*. Walter Tyler James C»*v Cbnnty, Col. Robert McCandlisli, ArcheT Haakin, James He tuple, jr. Allen Marston, »*nd t>oct. Robert P. Richardson York county, Maj. Thomas B. Grifl/n, Col. Robert Shield, Doet. Robert P. Waller, Doftt. Frederick B. ► Power, and Richard Coke,jr. ^ Warwick county, Doct.. Cawin L»nc Corbin, Viomas Curtis, Robert Lee, and Miles Cary. fTbe count.res of Elizabeth City and New Kent, ^nd the city of Williamsburg, made no appointments, _ tyjd of course were not represented in the conven tion. In relation to our venerable Chief Justice, John Marshall,Our estimable Senator John Tyler- as iuu OJ me muiviuums to uc nominated delegates fo tbe tiiate convention, u.11 entire unnnhnilv prevailed among the district deputies. Much diveisity of opin ion, however, existed m reJati. n to the other f wo. About 2 i'. 8t- the following placard was pasted ul the door of the con i t bouse. ‘•It is proposed that the deputies of the <n>iintu>s chd towns in the third senatorial district, meet at the tavern of Mr. William Kdloe. at 4 o'clock-this eve jrung, for the purpose of settling tho rules by which they \Vilt proceed <Sic. Same members now absent ore expected to arrive before that time. This course is concurred i:» by many of those piesent. WiliianC burg, March £7th, Alter this eotiticatioo, the deputies thom-iolrcs,, and the numberless citizen ?, from town and cmnitr ] who hud assembled on tbe occtisiou, separated. Punctually at four o’clock Die deputies b fore tn. med, twenty one in number, as^einbed at lid-iocs's Ta-, vciTij and having asked for, end obtained a private iLoin. they took possession nf it and closed their doers- A uuinh *r of citizens and others mot a t tiV | tavcro.to witness trie proceedings; bur learning from, one or' the deputies, who came out for a nfnmut, that the meeting was then a private e»e, nearly all! lot them Wont away. ; Jiiciuiivldua!, more anxious, - however, or moru •Jetcrc.in.•d in ponuiyero, r.cd who, | owning a freohohi in each of the towns and counties of the <Jtairict(hen represented, except Charles Ci:y [county. feeling a greater interest, at.'stake perhaps, desired llic deputy wi.o cnuje out to ito the full to i ! the meeting, and to enquire whether, under *urh • circurni lanccs, he might not be permitted to bo pro [ sent. After the mooting had been .<? unufime organi ‘i-cd, a member of it canto to the door'' and announced, to the f.w person* who remained! aimut the house, that, the mooting was then pub- ! lie, and that all who chose to do so, might come! in and notice the prouwediugs. On entering the room ! 1 understood that Col. Robert McHuudhsh of this! 1 city, a deputy from James fJity couciv, had boon ap-1 pointed chairman of the meeting, and Richard Coke. I hm. of Williamsburg, a deputy Aym the county of! i ork,uude Hecrctary. The meeting, among otlvr! things, reached fn vote by countio/nud cities; and! m their proceudiuga,to be governed by the. rules of ihoHeceuof Delegates. Having resolved also, to i amenable nt tfrecourthmiV.e on the following morrjinv l ot ten o'clock, the meeting adjourned. wu -jai.iruny morning, nrcoruiug to n<Ho_-:rtjrt;<'u; ' [ tl*c members of tho convention assembled at tho court-1 house—present, as -t too mceiiuu- on the cvoa;n<r ho : fore, nil the deputies, except I>r.'R. p. RicWdsmTmfi James Gitjr—and having miainKouslr. unpointed' Major Thomas Berkeley Grifau, vf York Town. I*r > j sklent, acd Riche, ni Coko, jr. of tVifiiatnrbttr^ ‘ cretary, proceeded to bu is l ines. Tho convention was first addressed V- Mr. Jdm B.' Christian of Charles City, who inn lucid, animated, j ar.d impressive speech, explained the gysit ojoctsafltI i interests about which they had met to act. ' Several otiior gentlemen also add*efispd tho chair. ! ! ^.Ir* Adams of Henrico, afierst^tiug to the Conven tion, the entire unanimity which prevailed among the members ia relation to tizn distinguished individuals, suggested the propriety of at once disposing of their election—and with this view he nominak-ri John Marshall of Richmond, as one of the individuals who should be recommended to the peopie of this dis trict for election to the State Convention. The ballots were then prepared, deposited and ejcamiii'd, and were all fimnJ to bo in favour of tho person pro posed. Mr. Kor.no then nominated John Tyler of Charles City county; end upon examination of tho ballots they wero found, in like manner, to be all in favour of that gentleman. T?oct. Gawin ij. Corcin of Y\ afvvieJt then nom inated Philip Norlnrno Nicholas of Richmond, who he fhh? was so '.veil known throughout the eountry for bis distinguished ability, patriotism, and private worth, that he required no further recommendation. Col. McCandlidli nominated Judge .Tames Semple cf Williamsburg, whom ho informed the Conven tion, the people of James-City county had, at a pub lic meeting, directed their dolcgntina'to nominate end support. The distinguished talents of Judge Sem ple, Col. McCandlUli said; bis devotion to Iho inte rests oft he lower cr>nntry--Jijs active and uniform I opposition to'he rail of a Convention—his dlsposi tion ■io admit a,s few' changes as possible igto the Constitution, and his desire Ui lot things stand, as! fl;r ns practicable, as they are—were strong recom mendations. Col. M- thought, to the people af Ras ter^. Virginia, and particularly to those of our owm district, in his favour. .ur. ooac in a t!':' r.uie manner supported the! nomination of Mr- Nicholas. Mr. N. ho said, bad great experience in public aiTnirs—he had been At-i torney General of Virginia fir more than twenty years Ills patriotism was unsurpassed—-his firmness J and consistency proverbial: he always locked before | ho leaped: nod in all respects, Mr. C. remarked, he w as fully competent to the duties required. Mr. Coke deprecated the election of Judge iScmple, who, he said, must necessarily feel great interest in re taining his officer “hd who, though admitted to be I able, was still a to ember of tho Judiciary: a depart-j mrnt of the Government which Mr. C. believed tb be rotten. Col. McCandlislt in reply to Mr Coke, said, that Judge P-omple was in favour of making some change j in tho Judiciary—that he was in favour of uniting t he | Jaw and chnncery jurisdictions, and for thus abolish ing tho chancery court". Mr. Christian supported, with mr.oh real, the1 nomination of Judge Bernple, who he .said was also in favour of reforming the executive council, ami of making some change in tho legislative department. J Mr Coke expressed his great regret at the delicacy oF| Mr. Christian’s situation in rclntiou to Judge Sera-j pie, end remarked also that Williamsburg itself,from ■ refusing to appoint deputies, was indifferent as to his j hominat.ion and election. Mr. Shepherd of Henrico expressed his rrgret a the situation in which tho delegations from Rich- j mond and Henrico were placed. They had come [ d'»wn, he said, prepared to support any two gentlemen j who should be brought forward by the deputations! f?om below—Judge Semple and Mr. Nicholas alone I errepte^—whom they wen knew- thmr constituents! would not support, and in opposition to whom, the}*! considered themselves, under ony possible circumstnn- ' ees, bound fo vote. Mr. 8. expressed hi" hope that ] his friends and hirflself might be relieved from their i rinbnrnistwrnt, by the nomination of some other in dividual. nod saved from the necessity of nominating one themselves. After some time spent oruong the members in consultation. Mr. Roane of Charles City and in a very handsome address to the chair, nominated Littleton W. Tazewell—of whom Mr. R.. said, it was as unnecessary for Kim to speak, as it Would be for him to Attempt to add hues tq the rainbow, or perfume to the violet.. The ballots were then cast, and the result proved to be as ftillows: Warwick and York, fbr Mr. Nicholas. Charles City and Jamds City, for Judge Simple, Richmond and Henrie-n, for Mr. Tazewell. On the second ballot, the votes stood thus: Warwick, York and Hdrifico, for Mr. Nicholas. Charles City and .Tames City, fbr Judge Simple. R ichmOrtd. for Mr Tazewell. The third Ballot, Mr. Tazewell being dropped, re sulted m- follow's: Warwick, York and ITenriro. f>r Mr. Nicholas'. Charles Ci*". James Citv o'nd Richmond, for Judge %mrL. ' .'*"i arrangement Having been rondo between the Charles City ami York deleg&tium-, the fourth balk l j resulted as follows: Warwick, York, £i»whis Cijy, ilpnfa^ anl| KtLh tuond lor KTr- j\i< hoto.i. James City,for Jmlgn Temple. On the fifth ballot, Judge Temple hei»a s!P.t, tend ahum, in nomination; Ifoct. Corbin nomfouimrCol. Burwell Bassett. vh-.a the fo’.ly\vir«- fe#ult- of the voles \vilS rejKirtod: Clmrles City, Jumys Ci/v and York, for JuJn-e Semple. ** Warwick, Ileuricosed Richmond, for Col. Bassett* 'Hie sirctli ballot rorsuluui as the filth bud done. 'Tjm seventh bid lot was like tj>j flfijj and sixth. to elect Judge Scujplii, Iwvingthus pro ved fruitless, he Was reluctantly withdraw^ by his frk::i and Ct !. Rpbort ."5 tuudlish Was nurn.nat/nl by Mr. Jatue.s Hemple. joh’r in his stead—Col. Mc C-kndlish, w ho ha/1 nominated Judge f4(!n»pl*v,cous-;n— tin gy m consultation with tin; Jaimes C’ilv delegation, to wit draw fciiu. The eighth and kY hall* to then cast, ami the following 'vus renorfed :o the result: ^ r arw ick, Y”ilf!<, Jnnu-^eilr, Hemic*) uuil RI.Ji-‘ umud, lor Col. R.i-r-eU. Charles City, Blank. fbU'that .m»Jio Marshall of U5d;i:i*/o J. John Tyler of C..ja.ru_-s (Htv, Philip Noroenne Nicholas of Rich mond, and I*unveil J5.issi.-tt of James City, u>»ro se lected by the C* invention a, the four individuals to he recommended to tlir people of the third Senatorial! district, for election to the State- Cw:a intion in ’i'eto ber n ext. A committee, coji&htinig of C -l. Robert Nlr-C'iwd lish, Richard C<>ke,jiin’r, mid Doct. Robert P. Wal ler, w a« then appointed to prepare a suitable address to the people of the district in support of the nomina tions ngreud upon, and tosuperintend rlio publlcalWn thereof, as well as of the prwcot-Juigs of the Couvftn tiyfl. Votes of t-tanks to the President and SetfrctnK, wore then unanimously pnsfo d, ami the Cnnvontkin, at about. 2 i-- .a. adjourned. A ClTfZKj'N, Wo were struck with one observatioa inthn.VI dretsof fk-i Committee of the Williamsburg ConvrL- 1 toOu, signed by “Robert AtcCandliah, and Hubert K Waller.” After adverting to the objection made Ip ill at mod.* uf nomination, yn a.-count uf tlm very pai •Jal concurrence of tin: io it, they sr*y\, “.Same oi those who have denounced the meeting ofcj Williamsburg, ; :s auii-rcpuldicRli nui dictatorial, have b*-ju tluJnts'iihev* guilty oftlie same error, (ifin deexi it bo. an, error.) They irave actually proceeded to nominate four persons to represent them in Con vention, and recommended them to the xett of tire District, and have promised top to support their elec tion, by all honorable moans.” It seems strange, that any mind should be Incapa ble of discriminating between an act of (ho people themselves, in thc-ir primary, sovereign character, and an a<-t performed by the representatives of a email portion of that people. The sum and substance of the objection to these District Conventions, is that wherever it is pmsible ibr the-people.to act for tfumsctves, they ought to be permitted to doit; and it certainly is a very equivocal compliment to them, ibr a certain number ot individual:? to interfere njid undertake to discharge for them so simple a duty as that of selecting their own reptguentafives! But when was it ever heard, before the disco retry was made by Messrs. AlcCundii.-h and Waller, that it was .‘anli-republioou” or “dictatorial,” fyr the people themselves to in their primary capacity, and designate the inei- idimls wtajin they prefer to serve them? True, the meeting at Richmond did rrot con tain ufl the people, but a portion only. But when was there ever a meeting of an entire* electoral com munity? The sense of the whole fs on!}' to be learn ed, by ascertaining the wishes of the several parts, and if every county end city of the District, follow-' iog the example of Richmond, kid nominated candi dates for itself, we should have found oiit whom the people of the District preferred, without the trouble that the gentlemen of the Williamsburg Convention so kindly put themselves to. Rut surely, the V/il Ijam.*-burg Committee cannot be serious in likening the character of the lucejing of the people of Rich mond to that oft he late Cnunis at Williamsburg; nor can it be necrsBiry to use any farther pnins to estab lish the distinction. lije i/ompiuco tartucr observe, that thosft who expressed the sentiment hostile to the Convention at Richmond, were but a small part of the city. The meeting ?ca« ccTtaiuly but a small part of the city, compared to the whole population; yet it was r largo and respectable meeting, and gave utterance when it disapproved the Convention nt Williams burg, wo really believe, to the sentiment of C out of 10 of this whole Community. “While (proceeds Messrs. McCandlisli and Waller), those \yhp objected to it, (the meeting at Williamsburg) represented but one city in the district, (Richmond) and as we arc in formed but a small portion of that, the members in the meeting represented the same city, and five coun troe of the District, which composed three fbuiths of its whole population.” There ?s a small mistake in tljs statement.— The gentleman who attended at Williamsburg, as the representative from Richmond, did not represent tb« people of Richmond; nor drd the delegates from Henrico, represent the po pft of Uenrico. This wo imagine, is evident from Mr. Shepherd's (who was one of the 2) ©am shm hfg: for tlmt gentleman promising that he cindd not vote for Mr. Nicholas, “under any possible circumstances,” as he knew his constituents “would not support him,” did nevertheless, immediately and pcrscvrfringly vo>c for him, until hb nomination was Recurred! We should think that Messrs. J>/fcCand lish and Waller, ought fn receive the testimony of JHr. Shepherd, a? the very best of which the nature efthccase is susceptible, and infallibly conclude from it,thatIlerrrico at lcasi, was not represented at Wil liamsburg. If the truth were ascertained, thd r* me Conclusion we have very little doubt, would bo tound e/jually applicablo to every eflunty and town id the District—non? of them wnfc represented at. Wil j liamsburg. . U- S Haw: Stock a' .Yeir York, . Igril j, 151 1-2 o ' (2’|, Br:hTn£' n Lcnlm, 103 a 103 1-j. ! JHO*l>W aOHfUXG, APRJLL 0, 18 :#. For the. Constitvtioxai. Whig. KcOharoy is a ^Tod thujg: ' <-*'uvd iu a subjnct, better in n k'ln^. J , T . ..... . Aitun<jtinfi.!i * ‘llltors; A versa to public life, I feel cuu jsideiab.c repugnance at all tunes, in obtruding |Sclt un tlm attention of the public: but 1 feel con j strained by indignation tit an appointment, maun by -tl>e present incumbent ui the presidential chutr iq vio | .ate my accustomed reserve. " i fhe public will, no doubt, bear ia mirul, that A-n • i.rcw Jackson was supported for the presidency, by the gutter and more respectable portion of his'sup | porters,* on the ground, that he would retrench thy [ expenses of our government, that he would cie»uscv the Au«jeiMi stable, and restore our government tu its original si: iplicity. We accordingly find hint! preaching up tiio doctrines of feform and retrench* i tnruu. in his pithy Inaugural. Hut I have hear* i? said, that a lbol cu»,preach good doctrine, but u. re-’ quires a wisu mtui to follow u- J>ct u» see, if all of tiu. budfrient acts of ht< admhustration, accord with ^he hint expectations of his supporters. I.-;-t us ex amine, if lie is likely to prov*, himself the wise man.! and a second ga^u, under whoso golden auspices, the iron age istabolished.*—TJamgJiopposed to ids election. 1 was predetermined to support the mea sures of his administration, so far a.i they were con ducive to the public good, ami as my humble abilities would avail. I esteem it us a duty of every citizen, enjoined by every consideration of oatrioti.-jiu to sus tain the salutary measures ufllio government of hi.s country; and thy part ot a factious opposition, to em barrass any measure of government from considera tions of prejudice against the ineo, who administer it. “Pnncipia, non homines,” is tiro motto, whieh should regulate our conduct, in political affairs, flen. Jackson lists been elevated to thi; highest office within the gift of a tf-e people, by t.uc unb.mght suf frages of hi? fellow citizens. It i-,’ the duty of those, who were hostile to hi.-; elevation to the high trust, to acquiesce in the demonstration of tile popular wish, nTuj give a reasonableaiul zealous stipr.ortto the ben eficial measures of Jus adimTflstratiou*. Ami though the selection of 1ns cabinet may bq highly exceptionu- 1 hie as to men, and far short of the people’s cvoovUl. 1 Uous, yr.i it is our bouuden duty, t) support and ap prove his administration, so long as toe gfivonuneiij. is judiciously and economically administered. Hut! when the great interests of the country, are neglec ted, or miumaungivd, or tJio public mony lavished on t ivonrites, to the prejudice of th- eoitutrys dignity, I hold it as a high and iiquortaut duty in the patriot, ilo animadvert agaiiut such nustuaungcinct.:, neglect or favouritism. isnt to the appointment. The western public hiivu,1 ! no doubt, viewed with deep interest aud surprize, the j tecall of G en. Wm. Ii. flarritSun, uml the appoint ment of ilaj. Thonma Muore of Kentucky, ih hi,s stead. Cuibono? Surely not the people’s. Thus is the government uunecesshrily put ta the expense of two rrastsions, to gratify the cupidity of one of General Jucluioo’s favourites, and apnrtiz&n, who distinguish ed himself by his violence of denunciation against all the supporteis of the then administration. A man of yesterday, raised up to the top of the pot by the ebul lition of party zeal, unknown to the country, till his gross abuse of the frauking privilege, and who has never rendered any signal service to his conntrv, is appointed to office, in exclusion of a man celebrated as an orator, ami who led tlie embattled legions of his country to victory and retrieved our disasters in the late war brought on by the cowardice of Hull, and the indiscretion of fchnyth, not to trse a more ap propriate term. Has General Ilarrison been grossly j negligent of his duty ns embassador? Jfas lm dc.gra I tied hi; high function in nay manner? I:;.- there been i any complaint'd justify hts recall? ' ' ImW act t heard a syllable ot disapprobation. A be first in timation of displeasure, is manifested hjs recall', j and tiie appointment of lijoore. Lot u i. ivelhore-' I srms for this step. Can the tauieut editor of the’ ^ Tcdegraph,justify this strange recall, ;■ nd appoint- : , ment, in the eyes of the world? We call on him. as ho stands the boasted oracle of the Administration, to reconcile this matter, with the dictate* of justice, i and sound policy. Will h« answer uft the simple' question: Why have £l3,CQOof the puMic nmu. y been thus expended? I JliLiUOhA. j U3*$r> f?ir from there being any cause of complaint i ! against Gen. Ifarris&u- cs Publico]a enquires, it is' not yet known we believe, whether he Isas safely ! reached his destination. When he was super ended j by Mi. Moore, thvi Government hail no intelligence I of bis having arrived in Colombia! Gen. Jackson j was in so great a hurry to billet the hero of'the hank ing privilege upon the Treasury, that he would not i , even permit Gen. Harrison to rehuH the country j | whither he had been sent! There is something in this tmnspetrou which 1ms1 hitherto evaded scrutiny. Gen. Harrison, with the general concurrence of the country in the propriety of his selection, had just been sent Minister to Co lombia, at on expence to the Treasury of £18,009.— Before ho had an opportunity or proving hirn.-feIf ade quate to the trust—beforobu had doite any tuftig geod or bad in performance of his ministerial functions—1 before it was so much as known that he had reached Coldtnbia—the President supercedes 1 im, atjd tip- j points Mr. Moore his successor at n fresh charge to' j tho Treasury,of $13,000. I? would be inf- rred ! other of the Foreign Ministers, \yUro os obnoxious to President. Jackson as Gen. Harrison—.yet this gentle man, of the whole number of Foreign Ambassadors b alone singled out fpr disgrace! This is yet nron remarkable, when wc consider fhe character and services of Gen Itarriaon—services rendered at a mo ment, and of a nature, to claim the permanent grati tude of tbc country, and which, if they did not secure t ho esteem of Gen. Jackson, ought at. lei^t to have I saved Gen. from tlio infTjction of what was evidently intended a9a peculiar personal disgrace.— j Gen. Jackson in this proceeding, paid as little respect j fo hisown professions as to (ho feelings of Gen. Har rison; for having informed the nation that ‘‘Reform was legibly inscribed on fhe list of hia official duties,” onoofthe first practical proofs ho gives of fhe fulfil ment of the implied promise, is gratuitously to pip $10,000 into the pocket of Mr. T. P. Moore! "What is the explanation of this peculiar eagerness On th" part of President Jackson, to disgrace and' mortify Gen. Harrison? Why should the minister' to Colombia, of all the foreign ministers, bo alone singled out for instant recal, when too, ho was the i last to leave theU. States for the purpose of oxecu- j ting his trust? \ arious conjectures are assigned for the bitterness of President Jackson's spite against Gen. Harrison; but the most probable surmises, as cribe it to Harrison's agency in the transactions of und to Mr- T. P. kf -ore’s importunate Cc■ ■ —iii nigw , mruid for remuneration. This last surmise ettftejS ui a3 the true one, fora critical examination6f (JCn% Jackson’s uppoiuuni’JUs, establishes beyond doubt* H,at lie has proceeded entirely upon the principles, of puniehin^ennrnhv iu his remov its, and rewarding partisans? m his appointments to cuhee. Qaialhipatian, •-erviec, experience, character, have hecn littlca if nt . aji regarded, in his eele'ctions: To have outraged thy morals and decency uf society, would.Huem to be good recommendations tp the ruling powers, if we tnav judge by same of the jigtsons who surround tiie IJer.o. Thu effort to disgrace Gen. Ilarritpn is oS itnji'o tent as malevolent. VIRGINIA KLECTIQNS. The elections for Congress and the State Iregy;’:': turo, commenced iu Virginia with the nauith lifonus v.ill obJftau: ’03 F&iJirig early acTflff^of re sult/ Antlitrriy-* Hatchet t,*Dr. Austin Wafkitfij. Sussex—Jar;*?.; Dillard, Gun- Ricjiu'al Epc.s— opposition. Kiny Ccor^e—Edward Oldham, N- H.Slasuo—jty optwsitiun. iu ihe JYolt'fV'a'j D.\Irict, no oppoiiiUau to Archer, for Congress--iu Unit of Sussex, none to TtczvuuI,— iu J\ ing George. the Vote was for John Taliaferro (tb*? former member) 100—for Willoughby Nevd.un It; a thin vote. * *Vw Slenibere. fur. forms lufstclerk of Uic Treasury,b.ps t»eeu r*'' moved, and Asbury Dickim,, appointed, in l;is pl.avv'-. Pi ch ins formerly served under Mr. Crawford, we b»y iicve in the same station. Ile mpv serve Tngh;im, Cme of Crawford’s wor.-Jt energies.) equally fail hfuity. Charles liny, first clerk ia the NavyDepai trnfhn. has Leva remov-A, but we do not le;irn by whan.. 1*size J-l<s<ry,—VVe are gratjVtvd at linking th\; leading article in the Inst number of the Medical Iy\\' cur-Pr, to be «. learned and hfghiy interesting p.rlfh essay “ on the diseases of children,” by’ M- Page, I'd* D. of initi city. Doctor page was before very aclvulj* tago-nialy known to tin? literary’ public; and the; gra-sp of mind, nail depth of thought displayed hi fpr1* work before us, is we!) calculated to sustain hlou l\j!l THB \VrHIG. Mr. RVhie’s Ufidying and relentless hatred of Sir. CJhVj Is t object of remark among his own political friends and patrypT . - -In his two last jiapersparticularly—he has sought occasion tp breathe his malignity against that distinguished patriot aoH statesman, wlicn every timorous mind would have been inspire**! with 1‘ar different emotions—Whew Mr. Clay was Secretary State, and sometimes partook of the hospitality of tkiriufi among whom he sojourned,—when these inoced were lim oiifv occasions upon which he could defend himself fruin the. uR-; untiring and infernal spirit of persecution which this counRy ever witnessed;—when the same practice was pursued by pgl:i>. ical adversaries high in office; there, was no end to Mr. RuCtSje'j vituperation and slan® about the ‘’travelling caJiiufj,”— tidueering dinners”—“prostitution of putalic office," 4cc- & t’. Now, when the. malignity of Mr. Ritchie and his party J>’n% triumphed—when Mr. Clay is no more titan a private citrrOTvv-— temporarily vanquished by his political foes;—(but fhajik Heaven,—bold and erect* and majestic amidst life reverses)— the same wretched spirit oj fault-finding nnd carping. isdjsWJV orcii in the columns of the Knouirer.—Nothing would havo been dearer to Mi. lUtr.hic’s heart, than that Mr. Ciay Slio&kl have travelled into exile not amidst the- unboi/ght plaudits ati>i acclamations of thousands whose coatidcnce in. and a juiifa^ tion of the men, are crump lin’d; but su.roundetl bv the and hisses of an enuuied multitude.—That Mr. Clay shtudi* ... . ^ - . 1 • 1 • -•*> aTongthein a portion of the C who voted Air the Li aro:-after-*, l the (.hareen of bargain and conuptinn*—is peculiarly giatin^ Mr. Kite hits—In his eh gain, language hn still tJicer>at Mr. {.ley • ns eating hi* n ay to K •ntecky" lie i» “siubued tvifb fiiVtp d jiii-r fceoes”—i’oormun—w;mt a sqaeTuiSb end duiicjitcoo' p 'tut: ha ha»J l or my part, l cannot l ein thhihlng, that Mr. will A* his dinner without ivking Mr. Ritchie’s leave.—Nay 1 Am:* ' believe; that wlien Mr. ('lay’s hospitable frietiCis undertake Vv tiic vvamth of the;r hearts to toast their gtic^f,—that -niesj tf f have tlic j'rc-rvrnptiou to say something in nun--without rrfflrV:' hig whether that something may he agictal !o or not to'jVR* Ritr.hie’s ear—Ritchie may Continue to scold,—but (Jay (y i’.f s'ill gn on to sneak. It is no wonder that what is .slid by th 'c injured and illustrious man, should he oflensive to the tools at'A parasites of (lettural Jackson.—He is destined 1 firmly bplity •• under I’rovidence—to bring back a deluded people to a setjsc hf the folly and mischief of elevating to power such a pack.' of rriUctranls a5 ard nmv our rulers. CAJ?.T1GATi^R. VinrilNIA ELECTIONS. qt'.c flertwo for n member of Congress to rrpncTnl them Neck District, flnd for member to tin* Si are Lt^WSvrvre; v-MJ held In King <icorge ctninty, on Tlinrsdby Irfst. llfSiitf follows: Far CCvgrcSS-~-’lohn Taliaferro jtm AViiioitgJiliy Nuyv'.Gn ’■» SJutr titni'Tc-—Aha- NcaTe yi —--CM no' jfti of Dtlty’b'Ed. <)b?;Un Jin Jich. Mason iiy l ’rom the Corrrtjirmdrnt of Ihe rtaHifijvrr (jirfivicr' Washington, April 2. Jtlin. fur Edward Duval Jute Indititi Agent, in Arkgf; rnu. has been Ftipcrftcrdod, nod J?7r. PonheYtm t,f f'hilntl-fphia ling been appointed Naval (JGrrcr Jit place ot‘dir. ,.?7iirk!oy. Do not be tMipprikcd to hx>n> m a few days, tlirii. the present TJ. JS. Trcaanre’j gives nines to a late frovornor of Peiirrsylvirnia, e'pii t?v Mite Attorney of this Distrist, will be ertefiapd I’rtim tips duty rtf representing tht> United St#rf'/.? in i:s circuit rmirts-. Take nil those things tts I r‘~\. ciivc them-^somu so—voroc may be bp. 7?/A faff- Flracirr.—The following is an fttU’qirV o*'n letter from rii oilicer on bMtrd the United S,lnfe Sloop of War Erie, dated “MATArcZA?, Mftreh 51 ft, 182ft. “The pirate is .1 resident of this place, where Jim vessel, a schooner of 71) tons, carrying two*giiTis nnd SO men, was fitted out. He carries on hjft fare lllo gear of ft wound. received in n desperate n'oeuntfe with the boats of Com. Polcrhj gquadron, a fhw ycrff« sinde, in which hi? Brother, the famous Diableto*, waft killed. “Should our Boats luckily fall in with him, We ft*'f feci assured of hi*capture, which will immediately put <a stop to any further doprrdnf ioim frtnv tBCfo lawless freebooter*. The . hip in the meantime will be actively engaged in the duty of conveying our merchantmen from the Havana and Mntnnzas-, and will not leave the nation unprotected till relieved by other crur/.ere. Vou tufty look for the eftrlifc. r. intelligence connected with the igshe of Our expedi tion, the return of which is nut looked for in less than ten or fifteen days.” r.r-rvVonof n.rot(*.—t’.y ih« gr.hr. Cnliimbtw. at N York, from St. Thomas, paper* of that pla- e to the 2«:h Feb. arc r< c/iived, one of winch mentions the execution of four nir.il. jt, niz: Andres Hr Marorc, ( apfnin; Mntfo do t'ftzos, irate; nnd two of the crew; throe were sentenced to wn-k jn irons during life, three for three years, and others for two years; those riot found guilty vrre set at largo. Titevess-l in which the taw was captured, was the Danish sHiooncr New ( >r*s, originally from St. Thomas for Gibralnn, hut pro.,e..,|) lj (o <•,,» proCu red a crew, and under the Colombian <Uu' rni»).er) a„ American ship, a Mosvon schooner, Ac.- She was htrailv captured by the Bueno* Ayrean prizatcer 1’iesidcnt, C apt. ( (ark, and het f 1* w • cut to St. THoinfts. ’ f .lIAUJtlED, on Saturday, the 4th inst. t v the Pcv. M*. K.-rr, Mr Jesse Hnowa. of Henrico, to Mi*s Mat v An;;. 1. ^ ' r cf Caj t. A^Uan'c! (’foyers, ri ilichnx i 2..