Newspaper Page Text
' I ' THE B I By Josiah Moi Drawing by Joseph Clement V-i -v C. w gf*T^HE day of the school boy has come I at last! From tb^ very earliest I times, when Shamans, medicine JL men, and priests monopolized the art of teaching, children have had to sit quietly and submissively under the benevolent tyranny of &Jk$5 the schoolmaster. If they had ideas of their own in regard to the sort of teacher they wished and !=a-pgsa=a needed, they were not consulted in the matter. If they had any notions of their own in regard to the discipline of the school, and the sort of ideals they were expected to live up to, no one consulted them about it. I do not here quarrel with these conditions; I merely state them. To a large extent the autocracy of the school room, like that of the home, expresses one of the most beautiful and happy of human relationships; being based, as it is, on the natural and wholesome instincts of love, care for the vounir. and leadership on the part of parent and teacher; and imitation, love, and respect on the part of child and pupil. But now comes my friend Dr. Book with the suggestion that it might be productive of good results to let teachers see themselves as their pupils see them. Everyone knows that children prefer some teachers to others. Now, Dr. Book's idea is that if we could get at the grounds of that preference, we should learn something that would be both profitable and interesting to know. Accordingly, he has attempted to get at these deep, unuttered thoughts of childhood and youth by the Socratic method of asking questions, what has significantly been called the hebamic method, or the method of the midwife. Dr. Book asked about a thousand students in various high schools from Massachusetts to Montana and Utah to describe carefully both the best teacher they ever had, and also the worst. Pupils Grabbed Their Opportunity A PPAREXTLY this was the opportunity that youth had been waiting for. all through the ages. Descriptions poured in thick and fast. Naturally, they showed no revolutionary spirit, nor did they write a Declaration of Independence. Children are in many respects the most conservative of human creatures. But they did tell in unmistakable terms the kind of teacher they wanted, the kind that helped them the most, and the kind that discouraged them and did them the most harm. "The best teacher," wrote a girl, "is the good natured, jolly teacher who enters into the fun and talk of the pupils as though she was one of them herself. She is always ready for a good joke: but should one lie in trouble, she is just as ready to help them out. She has the faculty for cheering one up." Another said, "My ideal teacher is not an automatic or brilliant talker, holding herself aloof from us. neither is she a cross taskmaster; but one who knows our first names, whom we can understand and who understands us, who knows something about our home lives and helps us in our every day trials and work." What are some of the characteristics of this ideal teacher? Well, of course she has all the virtues,?she i^> kind, generous, forgiving, considerate of the dull and slow, is never sarcastic, never ridicules or speaks harshly in class. "A certain teacher I once had,", wrote a girl, "was very nervous and at times very impatient and cross. I found it the burden of my life to learn anything she tried to teach while in this state of nervousness. But when she was her normal self, she was very pleasant and kind, and all went well. It only goes to show that a teacher who is kind can obtain better results than a teacher who is given to impatience and crankiness." Again, the helpful teacher is pleasant, cheerful, / 1 n n 11 t?/ k . 1 V? ?t v ? ? < .1 I i ?? ? ?~k i?/-k -% 4- . ^k k ? wk k . 1 uanmrt t, u?ipj'\, jum \ , wiii\ , *r\cn lcti it j 1 cu, sociable, and so forth < )ne girl wrote of her teacher, * She acts more as a friend than a teacher, and if in 1ST T E sXttL. : trouble I could go to her almost as soon as to my x mother. She is very jolly, has a keen sense of humor, and often enlivens the lesson with amusing stories." Another girl wrote, " I have now in mind a teacher r who on entering the recitation room seemed to carry with her a flood of sunshine which filled the room t and outshone all the difficulties of the lesson. This a particular teacher seemed never to be impatient, being always able to control herself, no matter how a serious the fault of the pupil. She taught her sub- f jeci. in sucn a wa\ as 10 (iraw peneci aiu'iiuun. c Above all, she did not attempt to make us fear her; c but was kind, friendly, sympathetic, and pleasant, s with a smile for all of us, whether we were brilliant t or dull." c Like Good Natured Teachers t rT"M IE following from a boy is typical: " < >ne teacher I has done me a world of good. He makes you t feel your own ignorance of a subject: but at the same t time does not make you feel that he knows it all. t We like good natured teachers, teachers who are I thorough and considerate in their lessons, teachers f who will laugh at a joke or give the class one occa- a sionally themselves." 1" These letters make a strong plea for patience and v reasonableness. " If a teacher is snappy," wrote a r girl, "or has the despicable habit of not giving you f time to think, the subject in which you have that n teacher is like torture." And another girl wrote, r "If only the teachers had this virtue" (patience), t " it would go a great way toward dispelling the bitterness that often accompanies recitations. It would k make study a pleasure instead of a torture, and g increase the bond of affection that ought to exist between pupil and teacher." Very many declare t that it is the teacher who is patient with them that ii makes high school life happy and successful, "a pleasure instead of a burden and a failure." e But the jolly, good natured, patient teacher is not an easy mark or a mollycoddle. (>n the contrary, he a is strict, decisive, and businesslike. He commands * respect and keeps good order because he says what a ? 4 ?.? I *1 1 he means and means wnat ne says, *vs one pupil i< put it, "Many have argued that pupils judge their c teachers by the easiness with which they may avoid d doing their lessons. But let me say that the majority h of the sympathetic teachers whom I have had have w been those who from day to day have required that ft their lessons be prepared. But I do not mean the r< teacher who, when the student says that for some reason he has been unable to prepare any particular lesson, looks at him as though he was a future em- / bezzler or forger." , . si Don't Object to Work p TT will come as a great surprise to some of us to a learn that, of all who described their best teachers, g not one mentioned a teacher that was said to i>e tl easy in his requirements of work. All the pupils g ask is that he be reasonable and remember that y they have other lessons to prepare besides his own. tl Of an "easy" teacher, a boy wrote, "He would tell a a pupil to do something, and if he didn't do it he tl would simply let it go. He never enforced what he si said, and as a consequence hardly a pupil respected tl him. He was nice and easy to get along with; but y we did not learn much under him. lie had no p strength of character, and therefore could not make cl ? ? * - 1 < 1 . _ _ _ 1. 1 1_. others strong. i ne teacner inai is sociaoie, wno a makes his pupils feel that he is one of them, who t( does not flare up, of whom the pupils are not afraid h and do not hesitate to ask questions, is sure to be a o favorite. tl In addition to his strong personality and lovable character, the favorite teacher has other qualifica- fc tions. He has sympathy enough to understand the p nature of boys and girls; and. if not learned, is en- p do wed with good, native commonsense, remembers w that he himself was once young, sympathizes with w the growing children in their efforts to adapt them- st 5 A C H E R elves to their highly complex and dirticult environnents, and is able and willing to help them because 10 ran caa Vtincrc frr?m t hoi r nnint r?f pintr Hf curh IV. VUH .JVV ** vril* bllVII J'VllIV VJI ? IV ?? . vy 1 CUV II . teacher, the pupils wrote. " She seems to understand is thoroughly,"?"recognizes the fact that some annot learn her subject so easily as others can, and reats us accordingly,"?"understands when a pupil s making a failure from pure nervousness or illness, ind quietly helps him along."?"had a keen apireciation of a girl's character, knew their every motion and thought and the very impulses that prompted them to do as they did."? "never forgot that she was once a school girl herself and had her trials and escapades, and therefore never k judged a girl before she had looked at the matter from her side,"?"had j^A the power to look into our minds and K&'\\ hearts, as it were, and to see all our A needs and defects and so know better si \ \ k?w to help us than anybody else. m VA ?"fully understood boys, seemed (|h ^ )) to have a knack for understanding f toA* J a boy's ways and needs, and to have the proper regard for the feelings of his pupils,"?"had been a boy orne himself, and therefore knows just \hat you need."?etc.. etc. Teachers Don't Understand Them T^HE great complaint, especially on the part of the boys, is that their teachers do not understand hem. Over and over again appear such sentences is. " Few if any teachers really understand boys."? ' Few teachers are able or willing to read pupils iright, "?" Many teachers try to understand us, but ew succeed."?" The majority never think they were ver bovs. and view evervthing as old men"; and juite a number declare! that no teacher in the .chool ever understood them, though most of them hought they did. A girl wrote, "What we get from the high school lepends on the teachers we have. There was one eacher in particular who seemed to understand her >upils thoroughly. I was always glad when it came ime to recite to her. She made me feel so at home hat I was not afraid to speak out all I felt. She rusted me and believed in me, and. to her at least, was not a hopeless idiot. I had another teacher, lowever, who had quite the opposite effect. He was l splendid teacher, and I learned something from lim; but the process was so painful that I shall'alcays shudder when I look back to it. The man was laturally nervous. I never remember having seen lim when he was not in motion. His laugh was the nost unpleasant laugh I ever heard. He trusted tobody and sympathized with none, and it seemed o give him pleasure when our marks registered low. i'et I believe the man meant well; the trouble all ay in the fact that he did not understand boys and iris." What teacher after reading such expressions as hese can continue to hold the opinions of his pupils n contempt, or be blind to the fact that he is always sized up " and weighed in the balance by the young xperts that sit at his feet ? 'n1 i i. 1 1 t A ' i1 i ne iaeai teacner must aiso De energetic, entnusistic, and young, in spirit at least, if not in years. i boy wrote of his favorite teacher, " He was young, nd in a group of boys a stranger could not tell the eacher from the pupils; but. notwithstanding, he ommanded great attention and respect. In fact, tiring the year I was in his class I never heard him ave to call the class to order once." Another boy rote of his best teacher, " He was one of us; but we ?lt more respect for him than for those teachers who died on their own vigorous efforts to keep order.". Oslerism Among Pupils "\F old teachers, one girl wrote. "I think an old teacher should not be allowed to teach, because rie is cranky and does not inspire herpupils asa young ?acher does."?"We must all grow old," observed nother girl; "but I do think some teachers have rown too old to teach. This may seem hard on hem; but it is the old teacher that we find it hard to et along with. They have taught for years and ears, and know so much about their subject that hey get all out of patience with anyone who cannot nswer right up." And a boy chimed in, "I think hat when teachers get old and crabbed their places hould be filled by younger ones. They have had heir turn, and ought to give Up their places to a ounger person who can sympathize with young eople and does not look on their natural fun as hildish or as an insult against themselves." Still nother lad observed, "Older teachers do not seem :> realize that methods of teaching as well as times ave changed, and so keep on teaching in the same Id way year after year. It is needless to say that lie pupils suffer by this." It is not old age that the pupils complain against, >r an aged teacher who is not cranky, cross, imatient, set in her ways, and out of touch and symathy with the young is more likely to be a favorite ith them than a young teacher. What the child ants from his teacher is what we all want,?and j few of us get,?namely, sympathy, that sort of