Newspaper Page Text
THE EVENING STAR With Sund|j Morning Edition. WA8HI H'O TON, D. C. SUNDAY.'._Juno 12. 1932 THEODORE W. NOYES_Editor The Evening Star Newspaper Company Business Office: 11th 8t. and Pennsylvania Ave. New York Office: 110 Kaat 42nd St. Chicago Office: Lake Michigan Building. European Office: 14 Regent IK.. London, i England. 1 - Bate by Carrier Within the City. The Evening Star.45c per month The Evening and Sunday Star ivrhen 4 Sundays!. 60c per month The E/ening and Sunday Star i when 5 Sundays! .65c per month The Sunday Star . 5c per copy Collection made et the end of each month Orders may be sent in by mall or telephone NAtlonal 5000 Rate by Mail—Payable In Advance. Maryland and Virginia. Dally and Sunday.1 yr , 610 00: 1 mo.. 65c Dally only .1 yr., 66 00: 1 mo.. 50c Sunday only .1 yr.. 64.00; 1 mo.. 40c All Other State* and Canada. Sally and Sunday... 1 yr., 812 00: 1 mo.. 81 00 ally only .I yr . 88 00:1 mo., 7ac Sunday t^nly .1 yr.. 85 00. 1 mo.. 6dc Member of the Asaociated Preaa. The Associated Press Is exclusively entitled to the use for republicatlon of all news dis patches credited to it or not otherwise ered ned in this paper and also the ,oca! news published herein. All rights of publication of special alspatches herein are also reserved. Get the Matter Done With! The economy bill, that started out with its flags so proudly flying and with its bands blaring forth the in spiring music of "Balance the Budget" has limped, at last, into conference, its uniform bespattered and tattered and torn. While it may come out partial ly revived by restoratives administered bv conferees determined to make the best of a bad situation, it is difficult to see how it can now accomplish Its original mission of closing the gap be tween what the revenue bill will bring in and what the Congress will spend. If it does, the days of miracles will, in truth, have returned. The governmental pay cutting Issue is easily the most difficult with which the conferees will have to deal. The House has approved a pay cut with ex emptions. The Senate has approved a furlough plan in place of the pay cut. It is difficult to understand how the conferees can make much out of what has been put upon them to do without exceeding the authority ordinarily given them. While a majority of the con ferees may be said to favor the pay cut principle over the furlough principle, the House exemption of $2,500 stands in the way of extending the pay cut to that army of low-paid employes who would furnish mast of the money to be saved. And if the furlough plan is favored by the conferees as a last re sort the wording of the House bill raises the question whether its $2,500 will not apply to the furlough as well as to the pay cut. But speculation on the outcome now is idle. Conferees have been known to cut the corners of legislative precedents and parliamentary rules before, and the temper of both houses now is to have done with the whole business and get through. That desire, in addition, must be felt by the country at large, and certainly is tell by the harried and harrassed Government employe. The latter has become the foot ball in as heartless a game as ever was played. He has been confronted with a succession of blows and encouraging pats until he knows not where he stands. First his pay, then his leave, then both, then neither—and under such conditions he could excusably become a fatalist and calmly resign himself to whatever for tune lies in final store, were it not for the embarrassing fact that he must continue to eat, to clothe and pro vide adequate housing for himself and for his dependents. The difficulty of doing these things under conditions that have threatened him in various forms have made of him an embattled adversary. In a manner of speaking, he is fighting for his life. The conferees have found the ma jority of both houses bitterly opposed to flat pay cuts that reach down deep into the pockets of low-paid men and women. There has been no overpower ing sentiment for pay cuts from the Nation, which slowly has come to the realization of what it would mean, not to public servant alone, but to his kin in private employment. The conferees should drop the pay cut plan as it affects the majority of workers, apply a modified furlough scheme and end their work. What everybody desires, and what is wholly important, is an immediate disposal of a question that has dragged along with out settlement since before the Con gress met last December. The un certainty has amounted to a form of mental torture to the Federal employe, and has created a distrust of the ability of Congress to act with any de gree of speed and decisiveness. Let the conferees end this uncer tainty now and close the Issue. •—-1 a . ■ Any one who has the fortune to be In attendance at either convention is likely to have his doubts about Am bassador Mellon's after-dinner intima tion that politics Is second to base ball In American interest. How Many Were in Line? Washington is a city of parades. Its afreets have probably been occupied by more procef&ions in the course of each year than are those of any other city in the United States. These spectacles are In celebration of national anni versaries, in commemoration of historte •vents, in expression of the pride of organization, in demonstration of senti ments, in the presentation of petitions. Their participants are sometimes uni formed or picturesquely costumed, or again are in the garb of civil life. Some are long parades, some are short. No record is made outside of the columns of the daily press of the number and nature of these pageants and no ac curate count is kept of the numbers participating. Such a count should be maintained. Some record should be preserved, for historical purposes at least, ol the size as well as the char acter of these public demonstrations. This thought is suggested by th« wide disparity of estimates of the counts of the number taking part in the march of the bonus petitioners here on Tuesday evening last. The Star on Friday con tained an account of the various esti mates of those in the line. Ten wide ly varying figures were given, ranging from 3.500 to 10.000, a spread of almost three to one. Iiypoint of tact it would have been quit* easy for one viewing the parade from above to count the number almost exactly. The men marched in column of fours in close order and though mov ing briskly could have been checked almost as precisely as though they had paved through a turnstile. Nobody seems to have done this, though the number of participants was a matter of some importance. The tendency in computing crowds is always toward exaggeration rather than minimising. On the occasion of the recent local Memorial day parade one account of the affair placed the number of par ticipants at twelve thousand, whereas in point of fact there were actually less | than one thousand in line. This is true in the guesses of other gatherings not in parade form. A group of one hundred people will gather in the street to observe some accidental happening and the impression is of several times that number. A thousand becomes two or three thousand, or five or maybe ten thousand, according to the point of view and the temperament of the observer. It should not be difficult to establish a system of parade enumeration. The police, who always accompany these marchers as escorts, and who attend as keepers of the lines, might be trained and instructed to note the numbers. Then a record could be kept, a census of the pave, as it were, to serve the historian of the future. No German Monarchy. It will be with a sigh ol satisfaction that the world will greet an official pledge by the militarist aristocrat gov ; eminent of Germany that it does not : contemplate the restoration of the mon archy. With the vons. the junkers and the generals with which the Papen Schleicher successor to the Bruening regime bristles, there was plenty of : ground for fear that the new cabinet looks with something more than a sym pathetic eye upon the substitution of a | sceptered sway for the rule of the re public. From the authentic lips of Baron Wilhelm von Gayl, minister of the in terior. the Reichsrat, or upper house of Germany, has just heard words which on their face evidence the Papen min istry's loyalty to the Weimar constitu tion. In the midst of Oermany's pres ent struggle for existence Baron von Gayl declares rumors of a return to the monarchy "are foolish and therefore harmful.1’ The minister of the interior does not give a blank check for the future. He suggests rather that ideas of a mon archy are simply not things on which any German government of this day and hour will squander thought or en ergy. The Reich has other and more pressing tasks. "Monarchy or republ.c," says Baron von Gayl, "is not a question that our time, let alone the present gov ernment, is called upon to solve." There Is here the veiled suggestion that what may not be feasible as to to day may come within the sphere of the practicable tomorrow. All that the Papen government wants the world to be aure about, apparently, is that there is no plan to precipitate the Reich back into what Hohenzollern idolators no doubt still consider the royal pomp and glory indispensable to Germany'* safety and welfare. "I shall be faithful to the oath of allegiance to the constitution that I swore before President von Hinden burg," Baron von Gayl asserts, "and the chancellor and the other ministers are In agreement with me" Meantime this Influential spokesman discloses that one of the cabinet's first tasks will be to propose certain amend ments to the constitution, In order “to bring it into line with developments in recent years.” Time only can tell what lies back of these cryptic words. They may mean that the government seeks wider powers for curbing such "develop ment*" as Hitler. They may denote a program for clothing either the Presi dent or the chancellor, or both, with even more dictatorial prerogative* than article forty-eight bestows. They may contemplate ways and means for meeting, In some form not now provided, the sudden contingency of the venerable Hindenburg's disappearance from the scene. He Is eighty-five years old. Federal constitutions, as the Ameri can people well know, are not immu table. They have amended their own nineteen times, and a twentieth amend ment, ordaining a change in the date of a newly elected President's inaugura tion, and a radical change in the sched ule of congressional organization, even now await* ratification by the Statas. _ _ That eminent Senator from New York, Dr. Copeland, is compelled to take a rest. Probably many other public men would follow his example if they had his knowledge of the danger of high and prolonged nervous tension. If the demands on statesmen continue to increase, it may be deemed proper for insurance expert* to classify politics as extra-hazardous occupation. Chicago'* Request for a Loan. Application has been made by the mayor of Chicago to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation for a loan to that | city of any amount from $40,000,000 to $150,000,000, to meet the city * impera tive need to pay long overdue salaries of school teachers and other employes and to meet other pressing financial obligations. The mayor said, in an nouncing the request: "Our paper Is as good as gold: we can pay the money back as soon as we collect the taxes for the last two years." Chicago's financial plight has been a national scandal for many months. Taxes to the amount of an enormous sum have been withheld from payment on the score of a protest against the assessment. The city has been virtu ally bankrupt In consequence. Extraor dinary efforts to raise funds to meat the "pressing financial obligations” of the municipality have failed. It was sought as one expedient to issue tax due certificates collectable when the dispute over the assessment Is settled by the courts, or by legislative action. These, however, have not been taken In any great quantity by the ciUsens. and j In consequence nearly all of the munici pal workers of all grades have suffered ! from lack of revenue. Chicago could give no guarantee to the Federal Government of reimburse ment of any loan that might be made to it through the Reconstruction Finance Corporation Its security. In short, Is Inadequate. Its credit has vanished. If it were a business corporation it would go Into receivership. Indeed, receiver ship has been proposed, but even a re ceiver would have grave trouble In find in* revenues to carry on the business. Extraordinary taxes might be levied, but with the basis of taxation, the assess ment, in almost universal dispute, there would be no way 10 compel payment. All the loans made by the Recon struction Finance Corporation are se cured. There is a presumptive capacity on the part of the borrower to pay at maturity. Chicago's capacity to pay anything borrowed to meet its current needs is decidedly uncertain in view of the fact that these delinquent taxes may never be collected. The assessments upon which they are based may be nullified. In these circumstances it is hardly likely that the Federal Govern ment will gamble on Chicago's ultimate solvency by making a loan of any amount. Kreuger * Trick Telephone. The late Ivar Kreuger. Sweden’s “match king,” who killed himself in Paris on the eve of the disclosure of the complete collapse of his widespread financial undertakings, was an ingenious person. For a long time he posed as the simple, silent man, shunning pub licity, enveloping himself in an atmos phere of mystery. Actually he was ac tive, alert and highly Inventive. He was a strange complex of apparent hon esty and actual dishonesty. Since his death and in the course of the Investi gation of his affairs much has been found to show that he was a veritable pirate in his operations, a forger, a floater of fraudulent bonds. Had he survived the revelations of his falsity he would probably have been tried for crimes of a grave character and in all likelihood would have been sent to prison. An interesting detail of Kreuger’s mechanism of fraud has just been dis covered in Stockholm, where some Eng lish auditors are Investigating the tan gled affairs of the Kreuger companies. They were at work in the apartment that has been widely known as Kreuger's “silent room.’’ his sanctum where he received his occasional visitors, when a telephone bell rang. One of the auditors took up the receiver but got no answer. The bell rang a second and a third time without a vocal re sponse over the wire. Then It was ac cidentally discovered that there was a button almost flush with the surface of the desk and that if a book or other object were pushed over It the tele phone bell began to ring. It was evi dently Kreuger's practice when he wished to get rid of an undesirable caller to give himself a phone ring by a casual movement and hold an imagin ary conversation which required his im mediate presence elsewhere, thus ef fectively curtailing the immediate con ference. Perhaps it was just one of Kreuger's tricks of self-msgnlflcation, but it looks like a part of the system of deceit which has brought such heavy loss upon multitudes of people and which led to Kreuger's own death. The Chicago bank that notified its depositors to withdraw their money be cause the work of taking care of it was not likely to be reasonably profitable will have an asset of good will worth a great deal should it in the course of time decide to reorganize and reopen. --* l Any "Red" with a trace of kindness in his make-up would remain as far from Anacostia as possible for fear of causing injustice in the public mind to men who have no thought in common with him. In so uncertain a state of affairs, an early Indorsement of any Democratic candidate may be a mistake, inasmuch as it is certain to concentrate opposi tion immediately. Admiration of old-fashioned poetry and music does not lead Henry Ford to develop the Idea and prefer the old fashtoned horse and buggy to the auto mobile. At present the idea of a campaign slogan for Mr. France of Maryland would seem to be something to the effect that “anything can happen.” The high cost of campaigning is again asserting itself as a means of dis couraging the rich. SHOOTING STARS. BY PHILANDER JOHNSON Old Song. Those deer old songs of long ego, They have a manner strange Of echoing from afar to chow How much our moods may change. A frown is shown on many a brow. Gone is the jaunty style. Nobody lightly tells us now To 'smile, smile, smile.” "The old kit bag” we sadly see With troubles packed once more. Pandora's box it seems to be. Though not of classic lore. We’re hoping, ss our heads we bow, That in a little while Tate will contrive to show us how To smile, smile, smile. Intangible Influences. “Are you afraid of ghosts?” "Not the kind discussed in psychic re search,” answered Senator Sorghum. "But I must admit these intangible boys, known as ghost w’rtters. sometimes scare me a little.” Jud Tunktns says the next time he sees a coUege professor, he's going to ask him whether in nistory, as far back as wrote up. there was ever a tax plan that gave entire satisfaction to everybody. Alcohol and Prtrolcum. Gas and rum— What foes they are! The ten-gallon tank And the 2-quart jar! Color Scheme. "Why do you persist in looking on the dark side?” "For variety's sake,” answered Mr. Dustin Stax. "I’m tired of having to study entries in red ink." "Money,” said Hi Ho. the sage of Chinatown, "Is most to be admired when it seeks usefulness instead of enter tainment." Comparativity. The universe goes round and round New wonders to reveal And humble you and I are found Like flies upon the wheel. "Old Satan has a heap o’ disguises." said Uncle Eben, "an- one ^>f his special favorites is Easy Money."’ STRENGTH IN WEAKNESS BY THE RIGHT REV. JAMES E. FREEMAN, D. D., IL. D, Bishop of Washington. "My strength is made perfect in weakness.” This paradoxical state ment was made to one of the strongest characters that the world has known— namely, the Apostle Paul. He had been writing to his young converts concern ing a physical malady that so hindered and restricted him in his field of oper ation that he plead that it might be re moved. The consistency of his appeal seemed quite obvious He felt that his ministry to men would be greatly in creased were his physical ailment re moved. The answer to his plea was: "My grace is sufficient for thee, for my strength is made perfect in weakness.” So impressed was he by this strange answer to his plea that he declared with boldness: "I will glory in my in firmities that the power of Christ may rest upon me.” He further declares "I take pleasure in infirmities, for when I am weak, then I am strong." When once he was satisfied that his physical , disability was to be the actual means of increased spiritual strength, he went on his way unembarrassed and unhindered. One of the remarkable things about life is that any expression of power or genius gTows very- frequently out of mis fortune, disappointment and hindrances placed in our way. The old adage that "necessity is the mother of invention” has been demonstrated again and again. As we study the lives of the men and women who have enriched the race, we are struck by the fact that in many cases, if not in most, their rare gifts were disclosed after a period of failure and defeat. Milton's blindness did not hinder him from producing one of the greatest allegories the w-orld has known, nor did Bedford gaol restrict Bunyan in his pilgrimage. Dante's exile was a contributing factor in the production of his immortal work. Robert Louis Stevenson, combating a disease that eventually destroyed him in the pilme of his manhood, wrote his finest verse and his most enduring fiction when he was beaten down and rendered physl cally Impotent by a dread malady. It Is hard for us to appraise the value of misfortune of any kind. Nat urally we seek to avoid It. We crave health and strength, we strive for those things that contribute to ease and luxury. There Is no inconsistency in this, but the more we study ourselves and the more rightly we appraise our best qualities and gifts, the more evi dent It Is that we really rise on "step ping stones of our dead selves to higher things.” No one goes out of his way to seek misfortune, and we are all Ir ritated and depressed when our ex pectations tall of realization. On the other hand, as we fairly survey our lives we discover that our real attain ments and our strongest virtues have been most highly developed In periods, where we have had to blaze our trail and fight our way. What is true of us individually Is true of us as a people. We have attained our truest and most lasting satisfactions, and we have grown in stature, as well as in power, where we have suffered reverses and had to contend with problems that seemed In superable. We are trying at the present time to work out a philosophy that will reconcile the stern hardships imposed upon us individually and collectively by a long period of depression. We are bound to believe that what we are ex periencing Is to produce a stronger and finer national character. With mate rial values depleted and gravely im paired. we are being compelled to con sider the deeper, finer value* of life. The disciplines and privations that are laid upon us are compelling us to deep re flection. Where we were self-assured and self-confident In the period of our affluence, we are being forced to freshly lecognize life's finer values and Its more permanent assets. It may be that we are coming to realize the significance of the Master's words: "My strength is made perfect in w eakness " Retention, Resubmission and Repeal, The Three R*s of Republican Policies BY WILLIAM HARD. The prohibition plank to be adopted at the Republican National Conven tion next week will be neither wet nor dry but amphibian It will have a sawdust top and web feet. Mr James R Oarfield the Presi dent's platform carpenter, left l*re for Chicago with two rough-hewn planks in his possession One of them had more sawdust on it than the other. It carried on its surface many words de nouncing alcohol and nullification At its bottom it carried "resubmission' of the eighteenth amendment The other one carried "resubmis sion” of the eighteenth amendment with simply a thinner veneer of verbal protective coloring Virtually every United States Sena tor, wet or dry. who is a delegate to the convention, has approved "resub mlssion " Postmaster General Brown, possessor of the southern delegates to tne convention, has also approved "re submission.’’ The southern delegates will tend strongly to approve his ap proval They will seem to the conven tion to reflect the views of the Presi dent. Intimate visitors of the President state that he will accept "resubmis sion” if the convention demands it. Other intimate visitors of the President state that he is as dry as ever and will repudiate any wet plank adopted by the convention. The answer is that "dry" has become a relative term. It U related to the conventions three R’s The convention’s three R s are re tention, resubmission, repeal. There is also a limping fourth R Referendum. This fourth R would call for an ad visory vote of the whole people prior to any action by the Congress toward changing the Constitution. It would Interpose an additional step between thought and action. It is a postpone ment device It found hardly any favor among the Republican State con ventions which chase delegates to the approaching Republican National Con vention. There will be virtually no delegates in the Republican National Convention instructed for referendum The convention will therefore, in all probability, choose only from among retention and resubmission and repeal. * * * * If the southern delegates are re sponsive to Postmaster General Brown s ideals, there will be an overwhelming majority of all delegates in the con vention for resubmisaion. The dele gates from the northern and eastern resubmishion States plus the southern delegates will be irresistible. The con sequences for the President as viewed in the dry light of the pronouncements of the National Prohibition Board of Strategy would seem at first to be woe some The National Prohibition Board of Strategy, embracing almost all of the most eminent leaders of the dry cause in the United States, has officially de clared that resubmission would be "nothing more nor less" than a scheme for "attracting the opponents of pro hibition" and "nothing more nor less" than "a sop for wet support." It ha* even officially declared that it would be "far more insidious and would far more greatly deceive the public" than an outright demand for repeal. The reason for this attitude by the National Prohibition Board of Strategy is that the human brain, in Washing-: ton, so far, even with the help of all known treatises on logic, has been un able to devise, under the Constitution, any resubmission proposal which would not carry with it the jxwsibility of com plete or partial repeal. * * * * A resubmission Senator stated the case today exactly by saying: "To resubmit the eighteenth amend ment means that the Congress, by a two-thirds vote of each house, shall send to the States a proposal dealing with the Constitution. That proposal, under the Constitution, can be only in the form of an amendment to the Con stitution. This amendment could not be: ’The eighteenth amendment is here by retained,’ That would be too humor ous even for a people with a sense of humor. You cannot have an amend ment simply repeating an amendment already in existence. The new proposed amendment would have to be new. It would have to say, for Instance. ‘The eighteenth amendment is hereby re pealed.' Or It would have to say. ‘The eighteenth amendment is hereby, in the folowing respects, changed.’ If three quarters cf the States *hould decline to ratify the proposed new amendment, then the old eighteenth amendment would be retained. That is true. Never theless, there would always be the pos sibility that three-quarters of the States might consent to ratify the proposed new amendment. Therefore, resubmls sion means possible repeal, or, at any rate, possible revision. I admit it. I admit it becau*e it cannot be denied." In practice, therefore, resubmission, along with giving the States a chance to retain the eighteenth amendment, gives them also inevitably one of two other chances—a chance to repeal it or a chance to revise it. Naither of these two last chances is genuinely desired by the National Prohibition Board of Strategy. What is hoped by administration leaders is that the National Prohibition Board of Strategy will prefer Mr. Hoo ver personally to any thinkable Demo cratic nominee and will realise that Mr. Hoover, in order to get re-elected, has to harmonize the Republican plat form with one most distressing sociolog ical fact. That fact is the deip*e!own controlling fact in the convention at Chicago. It . is as follows: The Republican voters in the dry States—whether Maine in the East or Kansas in the West—are very largely old-stock Americans who draw their allegiance to the Republican party out a of inheritance and out of a tradition extending back to the days of the War Between the States. They always seek to find all available Justifications for continuing to vote the Republican ticket. Their record is that In presi dential years they will vote It even In the midst of much dissatisfaction with Republican policies. * * * * Contrariwise, the Republican voters in the urban regions of the wet State* —whether New York in the East or Illinois in the West—include great numbers of new-stock Americans who care nothing at all about the War Be tween the States and who became Re publicans only through learning that the Republican party is the party of prosperity. They do not now see the prosperity. Their allegiance to the party has been economic, not emotional. They will be readier bolters many times over, than the old-atoek Republicans of the dry regions. But "they must not bolt ” That Is the central hope of those who would re-elect Mr. Hoover. Hence their sub sidiary hope that the National Prohibi tion Board of 8trategv will join them in tolerating resubmisaion It is a political necessity, they think, if the White House is to be occupied after March 4 next by a President who can say "I personally am as dry as ever.” Such counsels will in any case be dominant at Chicago, and the Repub lican party there, unless intercepted by some unforeseeable development, will start riding on a plank that can go like a covered wagon across the desert to resubmission and retention or like a submarine through the ocean to re-1 submlsLson and revision or resubmit - lion and repeal. < Copyr:*M. 1M2 > Helping Home Owners Who Are Embarrassed BY HARDEN COLFAX. One of the most hopeful signs of the day u found by Department of Com merce authorities in the rescue of thousands of financially embarrassed home owners in certain communities through organized private effort. It was disclosed today that the depart ment's Building and Housing Division is healing fine things about the work of local committees, composed of public spirited and socially-minded persons familiar with real estate problems, to whom harassed property owners may go for advice and assistance, and which in co-operation With unemployment relief organizations and welfare com mittees are rendering valuable assist ance to prevent needles* foreclosure* on small homes. The achievements of the Joint Wel fare Committee of the Philadelphia Real Estate Board are cited particularly by Arthur J. Mertzke, economic analyst of the division, in a report now being prepared Up to this week the committee had investigated more than 3.500 cases of individuals in financial difficulties over paying for their homes, and of these 85 per cent had been helped in one way or another. * * * * "The Division of Building and Hous ing learns." says a statement author ized Saturday, “that committee* or other similar groups to that at Phila delphia are already functioning in New York. New Jersey, Delaware and West Virginia as well as cities in other parts of Pennsylvania, noteworthy aroang these being Atlantic City and Camdqn in New Jersey and Wilmington in Dela ware. It hopes that this Philadelphia set-up will commend itself to other communities In still other parts of the country and. for this reason, is com mending the Idea. It is proposed to bring out a report embodying the plan in the course of the next few weeks. The survey was made in Philadelphia ; by Mr. Mertzke. at the request of the President's Conference on Home Build ing and Home Owning, because in Phil adelphia. so largely the home of build ing and loan associations, the plan had already been under way when the. President’s conference met last December.’’ I * * * * Composed of nine members, realtors and building and loan men, appointed jointly bv the Real Estate Board of the City of Philadelphia, and the State League of Building and Lzian Associations, the Philadelphia commit-. tee gives its services without remunera- ' tion The cases which come before It are reported to include financing prob lems of almost every description. Among these seeking help are included not only home owners threatened with foreclosure, but heads of families who are seeking ways of refinancing proper ties so as to lighten their present bur dens, individual* who have been »ub Jeeted to exorbitant financing charges and families out of employment and actually In want of food, unable to pay Interest or taxe*. Carried on in as informal and per- I sonal manner as possible, the work of the committee consist* in finding out all the details of the situation and, In the majority of case*, working out a helpful solution. Often it even inter- I cedes with the holders of the mortgages and urges them to extend the time in which a solution may be worked out. In many eases a written arrangement 1* made which leaves the existing mortgage undisturbed, and provides for the payment by mortgagees of taxe* which may be in arrears and reducing the monthly payment*. ♦ * * * In the majority of cases the commit tee finds the situation not hopeless. It encourages the distressed owners to do 1 everything within their power to hold on. at the same time interceding with the mortgagees Involved, asking them to co-operate with the committee by allowing a reasonable amount of time to work out a solution which will en Capital Sidelights BY WILL r. KENNEDY. "Martyrs do not die In vain.” I Hie assassination of President Gar field, on July 2, 1881, as he was about to take a special train to visit his alma mater, Williams College, Willlams town. Mass., by a disgruntled office seeker under the old political spoils system led to the establishment of the Civil Service as a merit system, which went into effect July 16, 1883. This new system was set up with the Idea that "a Government position should be a badge of honor”—and as a real economy measure wiping out the waste and extravagance of the old regime—providing that "those seeking public office were no longer to be made the sycophants to purveyors of office which rightfully belonged to the people." The golden Jubilee year of the Civil Service begins July 1. It will be ob served on that date by a new law going Into effect—a legislative rider on an appropriation bill—slashing the salaries in this “merit system.” Five years ago William C. Dcming, president of the U. S. Civil Service Commission, in a foreword to "The Romance of the Merit System." which he called "a splendid contribution to the epic of popular government,” writ ten by Matthew F. Halloran. an em ployee of the commission during its entire existence, said: "If we may call the Declaration of Independence our great charter of liberty, and the Constitution the com pass by which the Ship of State is held to its course, we may designate the Civil Service act the ballast which pre serves an even keel in the stress of political storm.” Mr. Halloran as historian in retro spect wrote: "Looking back over a period of 45 years of trials, tribulations and triumphs, the Civil Service Com mission, guardians of the merit system, with ‘Palmam qul meruit ferat' as Its motto, rejoices over work well done No blemish tarnishes its fair fame. Its integrity remains unsullied as a com ponent part of a great Government. "Profiting by the experience of the past, with renewed vigor and inspira tion for the future, as the fifth decade draws near it is well equipped to assist in upholding and perpetuating the high standard of the Civil Service In carrv ing on the Important work of the Gov ernment of a great and mighty Nation. As the Army and Navy stand for discipline and efficiency, so likewise does the Civil Service under the merit system uphold its beat traditions. This reward of salary reduction at the golden Jubilee celebration of a merit system which for half a century has efficiently kept the countless activi ties of the Government in operation for the benefit of all the people, no matter what President or member* of Congress might come or go, falls upon thousands who worked without salary increases during the period of the World War while those in outside employment were having their pay pyramided. And throughout the decades there have remained in this merit system thousands doing the Government's work by sheer devotion, giving inventive genius, scientific expertness, specialized training and experience which they could have sold for a much higher price in the open market. Out of this civil service—now to be rewarded with a wholesale pay cut— have come some of the Nation's best executives. There was a youth, appoint ed through a stenographer and type writer examination, serving in the Post Office Department by transfer from the New York customs house. When Presi dent Cleveland asked for a competent stenographer for the White House staff this youth was sent over. That was George B. Cortelyou. who was stenogra pher and executive clerk to President Cleveland, assistant secretary and secre tary to President McKinley, secretary to President Roosevelt, who later appointed him to the cabinet, where he was suc cessively Secretary of Commerce and Labor. Postmaster General and Secre tary of the Treasury. He left the public service to become president of the Con solidated Gas Co. of New York There you see the merit system an open door to a brilliant executive career. Members of Congress ought to appre ciate the devotion that lies behind this 50 years of civil service, for many of them were part of the merit system temporarily Among them are Repre sentatives John J. Boylan. New York: Leonidas C. Dyer, Missouri: Butler B. Hare. South Carolina: Homer Hoch, Kansas, Mayer Jacobeteln. New York, and Addison T Smith. Idaho Patrick J. Haltlgan, reading clerk of the House, was formerly a printer in the Govern ment Printing Office. The opportunities that civil service workers have for stepping out Into leadership in the business and profes sional world is illustrated In many ro mantic careers, such as that of Frank J. Hogan, nationally known as a leader of the District bar. who came to Wash ington from Georgia at the age of 33 and entered the Federal service at $1,200 a year, from which he resigned when receiving $1,800. Many high State officials throughout the country, leaders in the largest busi ness enterprises, men of prominence along all lines in the public eye, have served their apprenticeship in the Gov ernment service Clifford K. Berryman, the internationally famous cartoonist of The Star, was a draftsman in the Pat ent Office. In each branch of the Government are executives who have worked their way up from the lowest ranks to high executive positions through sheer merit, by dint of work well done and devotion to duty, wearing proudly their badge of honor—“In the Federal Service"— i which now brings them a pay cut >: George R. Wales of the Civil Service Commission. J. Edgar Hoover, director of the Bureau of Investigations, Depart ment of Justice: John Greene, deputy public printer: John F. Bethune. first foreign surveyor for the United States Tariff Commission; Ouy F. Allen, Bu reau of the Budget; Raymond F. Crist. Department of Labor: Charles O. Ab bott. secretary of the Smithsonian In stitution; Herbert D. Brown, chief of the Bureau of Efficiency; Edward C. Finney, Assistant Secretary, Department of the Interior; Wilbur J. Carr, Assist ant Secretary of State: George R. Put nam. commissioner of light houses—are among many who have cltjnbed from an entrance salary of 81.000 or less. Most of these men have repeatedly refused offers of much higher salaries from pri vate Industry. Contra Sirens. From the Louisville Courisr-Journtl. The Government will experiment with the radio as a substitute for foghorns. Will mariners hear croonera instead of sirens along the reef-strewn shore? Wasted Talent. F>om the Columbus Ohio Btste Journal. Apparently those Navy officials who have ruled that ensigns can't marry until two years after they’ve graduated discount the value of practical fight ing experience. Both Hard to Bear. From th* Keokuk Dsiir Ostt City. Proceedings In Washington tend to the conclusion that taxation with repre sentation may be about as unpopular as taxation without. able the mortgagor to tide over tha emergency. A remarkable degree of co-operation has been secured from building and loan associations, trust companies, mortgage companies, insurance com panies, lawyers and other individuals, the committee reports. The effective ness of its work seems to be due to the fact that it always endeavors to be fair and reasonable and that the mem bers are not paid for their services. To further the v.-ork of these local organizations it Is now planned to have them co-operate with a special committee of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, which regards urging ot leniency in payments on old mortgages as pan of its field. (Copyright, 1932.) • Problem of the Recapture Ftind BY FREDERIC J. UASK1N. - ■ -- On top ol the tax dilemma, the deficit, the bonus and the thousand other problems staring a busy Congress in the lace in an election year, the particularly vexed problem of what to do about the recapture clause of the Interstate com merce act la coming to a head. Con gress Is being pressed to decide whether to make a gift of some *360.000,000 to a part cf the common carriers of the United States and a deluge of litigation thereby Invited; to give the railroads free rein In the amount of profits they may make, or to reach a compromise. The recapture clause rose out of the turmell of railroad finance, created In large part by the war-time assumption or the carriers by the Government. The *500,000,000 revolving fund which had been created by Congress resulted In huge cash loans being advanced and the railroads owed the Government a good deal on account of addition* and betterments to railroad property while In Government hands In the hope of ultimately balancing the books, the act to regulate commerce was amended to Include what has since been called the recapture clause. This provided that In case a railroad made net earnings of more than 6 per cent it should divide the excess above that percentage with the Treasury of the United States. Nothing seems to be more technical than railroad law, especially as it ap plies to finance. The opportunities for Utigation are numberless. There has been a good deal up to the present, but under certain circumstances it is ex pected that a new flood of law suits will follow action on the recapture clause. The amount paid into this fund by railroads which have earned more than 6 per cent since 1920, when the pro vision took effect, Is not large It amounts to only *10,681.000 and nearly all of this has been paid under pro test Loss than *40,000 has actually been turned over by railroads witnou: any strings attached. Money Not Available. It Is stated that this huge sum has accrued, but is not In hand, because of refusal of the railroad* to turn over the money. Injunctions preventing collections have been obtained and the propriety of the collection of these ex cess earnings is a question before me court* The law’s delay is so fruitful of postponement! that the business has been held up for years Each year the sum grows. Even the *10,000,000 whicn has been paid In has been paie under protest snd therefore eanot be used to make loans to distressed roads, a pur pose of Congress in originally provid ing for the fund. The *360.000,000 ac crued has. in some cases, actually been set aside In railroad reserves and is in tact, en escrow in a manner, wnle. In other cases it is merely a book charge In any event, the Government has not been ahle to lay hand* on the money. Meantime two plans are pending to settle the whole question. The first plan calls for the straight repeal of the re capture clause. A bill offered by Repre sentative Rayburn of Texas, providing for repeal, wiping off the whole original legislation now is before Congress. The Interstate Commerce Commission has gone on record as favoring the repeal, some members being in favor of making th« repeal retroactive: others merely being willing to have its operation go no farther than it has gone, with no future collections or accruala. The objection to repeal of the recap ture clause which has been voiced Is that. If made retroactive, It would con stitute a gift of *360.000.000 to the rail road*. Nor would all of the railroad! receive this gift; only those who need it the least. Of the 162 class 1 rail roads, recapture has accrued on 90 Of 232 class 2 railroads, recapture has ac crued on 138. Of 329 etas* 3 railroads, recapture has accrued on 134. On 363 lesser lines, recapture has accrued on 84. Those roads which have been earn ing a full 6 per cent for themselves, and then an overplus agregating $720. 000.000, to be divided with the Govern ment. are the ones which would, under the repeal bill of Representative Rav bum, be relieved of this indebtedness, despite the fact that they would not have been accumulating anything were not their earnings high. The roads which have been limping along making less than 6 per cent—some only 1 or 2 1 per cent—have had nothing subject to j recapture and, therefore, would have no part in the gift involved In the repeal measure. Who Should Get Rebate. Here arises a new question. If the money is returned should these rail roads be permitted to keep It? In any Anal analysis it is obvious that the money originally was paid by the ship pers The Atchison. Topeka k Santa Fe, for example, Is one of the big trunk lines earning recapture excess If the Government refunds this debt, the ques tion arises, should not the railroad, in turn, refund a proportionate amount to the shippers who paid the freight bills? A cloud of litigation, instigated by the shippers, which would congest court . dockets for years would likely follow 1 repeal. A substitute measure ha* been offered by Representative Nelson of Wisconsin. His plan does not can for repeal but for continued recap* -re or. a •>«*;« which would be mere to '-arr.eri Instead of re**p'.v-e r.r/7 t'.rr.r.g annually Irons now »•< ~ an aver age for i.eree-?**- p**~ •/!> «o..f (uo*V.ured t - cf •*.» mcr-»/ taxer. *.y to V.-'*--.re- v - d oe ica.ed dr.v-. i.*„t pe--e--»r* made tv: e ;e-.-.<d t*. p*r-od at U-e d_u:r**.t- tf tee fremau Cn mer-.e Ccetarasxr. A-c C.U'X.tf.r.r ™.v,s cf i.v s-f of ln. Jt-.tec ditot .ip* -.*.» ez.t’.r.g x ■ j fu_.-mi.ftd 07 1 -a -'s-c wrt-.tr. made su trap *. per oe-.t 'until it chanced that a .- .g» dam prt .ee*. m erected tt tt» its ?r 1 tor a year the _c* .cad 1 ter-y profit* ole bus me** aru-cg f.*tsr. tut* .ca.._ng cf 2 - art ton nage cf m*'»-t». ftr the dam Thu or.e yea: rp_.td »z:e*.s profit* tnto the recapt-re titegcry But the year be fore and the year after showed return* far under the * per cent In *uch a case the Nelson bill would atersge those three years of earning*, taking a small er amount or perhaps nothing, but stabilizing the railroad s finance* Another quandary has been raised in connection with the valutlon of railroad property on which reasonable rates are computed. In the famous St. Louis & O'Fallon Railroad case the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that about 50 per cent weight should be given the O'Fallon's contention that valuation should be based on repro du^on new less depreciation. The Interstate Commerce Commission op posed this view and the court held that the other 50 per cent should be weighted In accordance with the com missions view that original cost be the basis. In the later Richmond, Fred ericksburg k Potomac case, the court gave a 60-40 division of importance. So the whole question is more or less suspended Fifty Years Ago In The Star Fifty year* ago Congress was engaged In increasing the departmental forces in T Washington, with ad lncreasing ditional appropria TT S r.rr.i tions In the annual u. o. forces bllls ln,.ead o{ It_ ducing the forces and salaries, as at present. The Star of June 9. 1882. prints the following news item: "The legislative, executive and judicial appropriation bill was reported to the House yesterday afternoon. It appro priated *19,777,627.90. The total num ber of persons employed In the several executive departments and their respective bureaus or offices at Washington under specific au thority of law during the current year is 5.313; the number employed and paid from miscellaneous appropriations is 840. making In all 6.155 actually In serv ice during the current fiscal year, at an aggregate cost of *7.367,531.82. The number estimated for the service of the ensuing fiscal year of 1883 is 7.649. at a co*t of *9,477,608. The number rec ommended in the bill is 7,552, at a cost per annum of *9,195,611.25, "The present force in the Pension Office Is 742 employes, at an annual cost of *868.530. The bill provides an addi tional force of 817 employes, at an an nual cost of 81.013.400. The present force in the surgeon general's office is 257 employes, at an annual cost of $307,737.67. The bill provides an addi tional force of 166 employes, at an an nual cost of *224.290. The present force in the adjutant general's office is 423 employes, at an annual cost of *498. 071.24. The bill provides an additional force of 167 employes, at an annual cost of (200.660. There ia also a proper increase for the same purpose in the second auditor's, third auditor's, second controller's and the office of the Secre tary of War, rendered necessary on ac count of the increase in the Pension Office. The bill also provides for sn increase of 14 clerics In the office of the sixth auditor. Among the changes in troduced in the bill is the abolition of what is known as general service men in the War Department, a system by I which enlisted men have been employed I in clerical duty.” * * ♦ Charles H. Read, the counsel for Gulteau, who succeeded Scoville In the _ ., _ defense of Gar Ouiteau Beceivei field's assassin Spiritual Counsel. teau's behalf, despite the refusal of the appellate court to set aside the rulings of the trial court and the verdict of guilty. In The Star of June 10, 1882. is an account of Reed's visit to the jail to secure Guiteau's signature to papers to accompany a petition for a writ of habeas corpus to one of the branches of the Supreme Court of the United States. Guileeu said .that he had no Idea that this effort would be of any use. but he signed the papers to satlsty his counsel. The 6tar'$ account con tinues : “On Thursday last the prisoner had a long conversation with the warden of the Jail, Oen. Crocker, in reference to receiving the visits of some minister regularly. Gulteau did not seem in clined to make any selection at first, claiming that he could get along well enough without one, and that there was no need of one In his ease, but finally said that he could see the propriety of having one regular minister. A number of names were proposed and canvassed, and when that of Rev. Dr. W W Hicks of the Tabernacle, South Washington, was mentioned Gulteau made some minute inquiries as to him and said that he would be glad if Dr. Hicks would call. Dr. Hicks yesterday went to the jail and entered Guiteau’s cell with Oen. Crocker. The prisoner received the minister very courteously and after some preliminary conversation entered upon a discussion of his ease, dwelling upon the Inspiration theory, speaking with vehemence and frequently striking the table with his hands. Dr. Hicks then asked what would be the effect on his theory if he found that three weeks from that day he would certainly be hanged and suggested that man was re sponsible for hts acts. Dr. Hicks sug gested that they should pray together and Guiteau responded. By all means.' A prayer was then offered and the pris oner. with much feeling, responded fre quently In devoutly uttered ‘Amens.’ Britain More Hopeful Regarding Lausanne BY A. G. GARDINER. LONDON, June II.—-President Eair.onn De Valera's vlait to London on Friday, which, in spite of the action of the Irish Senate in postponing the aboli tion of the oath of allegiance, did not disclose any change In the Irish lead ers adamant attitude, delayed the de parture of Premier Ramsay MacDon ald and Sir John Simon to Pans for the negotiations with Premier Herriot preparatory to the Lausanne and Geneva conferences Both are meet ing the French premier over the wee* end. A more cheerful spirit prevails here in regard to the prospects at Lausanne. Herriot s declaration of policy Tuesday created a good impression. It Indicated a definite change of atmosphere in French foreign policy, no disposition to seek the support of Andre Tardieu and a conciliatory attitude toward the French Socialists, who are firm in their insistence on disarmament and better relations with Germany. It is felt here that the more Herriot relies lor support on the Left, the more chance there is of favorable results both at Lausanne and Geneva. lk ik * * It is gratifying also that the political upheaval in Germany has not rattled the new French government. Internal ly that upheaval has created an explo sive situation. Chancellor Franz von Papen obviously is moving toward an undisguised dictatorship. Clearly he has no intention of being trammeled by the Reichstag, and. equally clearly, he contemplates dissolution of the Prus sian Diet and the administration of Prussia by a Reich commissioner. This has aroused grave alarm in Bavaria, which never was cordial to Prussia, and will not tolerate its liberties being overridden by a Prussian dictatorship. The course of internal events in Ger many until the Reichstag elections July 31 largely depends upon the relations established between Gen Kurt von Schleicher. Reichwehr minister, who is the real power behind the new chan cellor, and the Hitlerite*, who are cer tain to be the most formidable party returned at the polls. * ¥ * * But the domeatic confusion in Ger many should not prejudice affairs at Lausanne or Geneva next week. Von Papen is likely to take a position both on reparations and disarmament prac tically the same as that which Dr. Heinrich Bruemng would have taken: namely, an equality status in regard to armaments and a declaration of inabil ity to pay reparations. On the latter question opinion is much clarified and Herrlot. while insisting that Germany cannot be permitted simply to disavow her obligations, expresses readiness to discuss any proposals calculated to pro mote the stability of the world. That Germany cannot pay now ad mits of no dispute, and though in the future she may be in a position to pay something—say a moderate total of five or six hundred million dollars over a period of years—the feeling everywhere is condensing to the view that the world can no longer afford the conse quences of prolongation of the repara tions controversy. * * * * As the London Spectator remarks, both this country and France will gain more by complete cancellation of repar ations now than by any deferred pay ment that might be harvested after a prolonged moratorium. Influential British opinion favors MacDonald announcing at Lausanne that, while Germany's juridical obliga tions to pay still stand, her inability to pay is recognized end that Britain in tends to accept no further reparations payments. It is also suggested that the premier offer to remit the war debt of any country that similarly relinquishes reparations from Germany. The al ternative is a prolonged extension of the moratorium, but this without Anal agreement as to a limited basis of the settlement would still leave the prob lem hanging like a nightmare over fu ture world trade. (Copyrlfht. 1932.) This interview evidently made a consid erable impression on the prisoner, for in parting he bade Dr Hicks good-by warmly, inviting him to come again as often as he could and telling him he would like to see him daily if possible/*