Newspaper Page Text
U. S. Duty to Act Seen in Michigan Constitution Guarantee to States Is Held Operative. BY DAVID LAWRENCE. THE Constitution of the United States prescribes that “the United States shall guarantee to every State in the Union a republican form of government.” What is meant by a republican form of government is that there shall be an executive, legislative and judicial branch and that each shall be permit ted to function without hin drance either from any other branch or any other group or interest. The State of Michigan today is without a re publican form of government be- Davld Liwrence cause the courts of that State—the judicial branch are powerless to enforce their orders and decrees. The laws of the United States—re vised statutes 5399—provide for Fed eral action in such an emergency. This correspondent quoted the text of the law of 1871 in a dispatch just a week ago. The statute makes it obligatory upon the President of the United States to compel obedience to the orders of a court whenever, from any cause, the State authorities fail to furnish such enforcement. It has been in some quarters as sumed that Federal intervention can come only upon application of a State Legislature or the Governor or both, but while the Constitution does pro vide for the use of Federal force when the Governor and Legislature apply for it, there is a separate obliga tion of the Federal Government to Intervene which is absolute, irrespec tive of how the Legislature and the Governor feel about it. Huey Long's Rule Cited. The reason for the proviso is quite simple. For instance, not long ago, in Louisiana, Huey Long controlled both the office of Governor and the State Legislature. The only po tential restraint upon both was the courts, and just before his death, the situation w’as rapidly crystalizing to ward a point where Federal inter vention was being suggested as a means of guaranteeing a republican form of government for the State of Louisiana. Since a State Legislature, working in close co-operation with a Governor, might seize governmental power and create a virtual dictatorship by con trolling election machinery, the Fed eral power of guaranteeing a republi can form of government very natur ally has to come in as a protection to the citizens. It was under this broad provision of the Constitution that the law of 1871 was framed, and while it has been used sparingly, it Is designed for situations in which local State government falls down. In Michigan today, mob rule has been substituted for court rule. Even n contract solemnly entered into as binding between the John Lewis unions and the General Motors Co. has been violated again and again by sit-down strikes. Thirty strikes have occurred since the contract was signed on Feb ruary 11. Union leaders are said to be unable to control their own men. Discipline is gone because a handful of workers realize there is no punish ment or penalty w'hen they interrupt production. The union has no means of compelling obedience and the State authorities are inactive. Johnson Points to 1871 Statute, j The Senate of the United States |has begun to debate the Michigan situation. Senator Hiram Johnson of California, one of the mast courageous men in public life, has pointed to the statute of 1871 as requiring the Presi dent of the United States to back up the State courts in their enforcement of law. Other Senators feel this . would be an extreme step to take and that Gov. Murphy's policy of watch ■ful waiting should be commended. 'But as the situation progresses and more and more a minority of workers feel their power, it is feared that the situation may, if untouched by the firm hand of the law now', develop tragic consequences in which unneces sary bloodshed will occur. Unfortunately, there is 8 dispasition In the Washington Government itself to condone “sit-down” strikes. Sena , tor Wagner’s speech undoubtedly re 1 fleets accurately the viewpoint of | President Roosevelt and Secretary .Perkins. Mr. Wagner thinks that two : wrongs make a right and that, because ■some employers have been heartless, ;the provocation to use physical force may be forgiven. Legal Powers Unused. Unhappily, Senator Wagner, in his discussion of the labor act which bears his name, did not go into detail and tell the Senate both sides of the story. It is true employers have re fused to obey the Wagner law, but any citizen has a right to enjoin in a court the enforcement of a law be lieved by counsel to be unconstitu tional. But the "sit-down" strikers have not gone Into court. Nor have they invoked those provisions of the Wagner law that are not under legal attack. For instance, the National Labor Board has powers of investi gation and inquiry under the Wagner act which can be brought into action If the workers apply for it. No em ployer can stop that step. Yet C. I. O. union leaders refuse to have this Fed eral machinery used for fear a deci aion against them and in favor of the A. F. of L. type of labor unit might have to be made. So it is labor itself which has •abotaged the important features of the Wagner law. The Federal Gov ernment, which has ample power to prevent "sit-down” strikes or to insist that law and order be maintained in Michigan, has engaged in a “sit-down” against the functioning of a republi can form of government in Michigan. (Copyright. 1937.) . .. . -- ■■ % WOMEN IN POLITICS TOPEKA, Kans., April 3 (JP.—The hand that rocks the crade is extend ing its sway in Kansas—more women are going in for politics. Following a precedent set last year by New Albany—where a 100 per cent "petticoat” administration won office —five smaller cities have all-women tickets for April 5 municipal elections. In Nashville, Kans., every candidate on both tickets is a woman. Burl ingame, Ford and Cherokee have all fwomen tickets opposing men. New Albany's feminine incumbents are urJfc opposed for re-election. u News Behind the News March Industrial Production, at 119, Equals That for Boom Year of 1929. BY PAUL MALLON. THEY said 1929 would never return, but here it is. Industrial produc tion has hit 119 for March, a figure which happens to be the exact average of the boom year, seven years ago. The figure is not official yet, and will not be for 30 days, but it is based on an informed private estimate which has proved uncannily accurate in the past, and it can be guaranteed as the closest possible unofficial guess. This does not mean everything is back to the level of the hoodoo year, but merely that the volume of factory goods is being turned out at that peak rate. Employment is 4*4 points below 1929, wages oft lO'/a points, de partment store sales off 15, prices off 9; freight loadings off 23 and building off 52. Only freight loadings and building are, therefore, still far deficient. Use of trucks has, of course, destroyed much of the significance of a freight loading comparison with the more or less good-bad old days, while no one expects building to oe resumed on a mad 1929 over-ex pansion scale any time soon. Note—In March. 1929. produc tion was also exactly 119. It reached a high of 125 In June and ended the year at 103, the col lapse starting In July. The situation is reduced to num bers in the following chart. The figures are those officially used by the Government, except the last OU.bOY. AH I GLAD TO SEE . TOU// -rrnANKj, < uNCLt m 6UDT0BE BACK.. y)LEVEL | month, March, which is estimated. The figures are adjusted lor sea sonal variations, so that each represents a percentage ot a selected normal existing for the period designated. The selected normal is the average for 1923-25, inclusive, lor all of the indices except prices, which are based on 1926 as 100. (The increase in population since 1923-25 or 1929 is not taken into account in the figures.) ■*» 'T' G fl C _ C D w>' © «.2 _ S » a 6 « - St £6 O £c t . £■ S.** • tr 3 U mIG flfi ^ us T3 "J ()«■ d J S-o w °“;3 £ =£ £« £ £3 «o 1929 average_ 119 105 109 106 111 117 95.3 1930 average- 96 91 89 92 102 92 86.4 19J11 average_ 81 77 67 75 92 63 73.0 1932 average- 64 66 47 56 69 28 64.8 1933 average- 76 72 99 58 67 27 65,9 1934 average- 79 82 «3 62 73 32 74 9 1935 average_ 90 86 71. 63 79 3i 8. 1936 average- 105 92 82 72 88 55 1936 January_ 97 89 74 70 81 61 80.6 February.,. 94 87 74 70 83 52 80.6 March _ 93 88 77 66 84 47 79.6 1937 January... 114 98.8 90.6 80 93 63 85.9 February... 116 99.6 95.7 80 95 64 86 3 March . 119 100.5 98.5 83 96 64 87.2 Strangest part of the March factory output is it was accomplished amid a wave of sit-down, stand-up and lean-sideways labor gymnastics. Strikes have upset the largest industry continuously since the first of the year, yet they have not stopped the general rising tide. Auto figures indicate, in fact, that more cars have been turned, out in the first quarter this year than last year, when there were no strikes. Ford and Chrysler produced heavily when General Motors was out; Ford and General Motors hummed when Chrysler was out. At any rate, that was the situation up to the end of March. Meanwhile, most of the other industries have been climbing slowly and gradually. Progress was reported throughout March in electrical power, steel, coal. As every one knows, steel, the basic industry, is running at more than 90 per cent capacity, and is practically at the peak of 1929. Steels old boom peak was 102 per cent capacity, but capacity has increased more than 12 per cent since then. The threat of a strike helped coal, but elec tric power distribution indicated a wide general expansion by factory consumers. * * * * The five-point pay roll jump in February is said by the Government to represent a general increase in total pay rolls and is not due to wage in creases in the two large industries. The Bureau of Labor statistics says pay WY- WHAT ^ AN APPETITE' _ roll expansion was noted in 11 in dustries out of 90 surveyed in Feb ruary. Re-employment was likewise gen erally distributed through the fac tory world. If this is true, it means a wider distribution of purchasing power to sustain the recovery. The people generally will have more money to absorb the increased production of ^ the factories. The price level does not appear to have advanced yet to a point where it might cause a dimin ishing demand for products. The figures mean the factories are turning out a 1929 volume of goods for prices roughtly 10 per cent lower employing 5 per cent fewer men for manufacturing this same volume of goods and paying them 10 per cent less in the weekly pay check. All this indicates economic strength behind the figures as far as they go. Of course they do not take in salaried persons, white collar workers, who comprise the great bulk of consumers of the country, or the farmer income, but the farmer, at least, has prospects of a much higher income this year. * * * * Political-minded people will fail to find in the figures the crisis which • the President has talked about. The figures deal with the past, the President with the future. His economists foresee the prospect of a demand for goods soon exceeding production, thereby causing the bidding up of prices to boom inflation heights. The figures to date merely showjwices continuing to advance at a very rapid gait. The first week in February, prices were 85.4 per cent of 1926: second week, 85.6; third, 86; fourth, 86.1; first week in March, 86.1; then 87.2, 87.6, 87.8, a steady and continuous rise, which really started last Fall. Power of Nepotism Is Denied By Schools'’ Official in List McQueeney, Superintendent of Custo dians, Declares He Only Receives Job Applications. Dispensing patronage to the faith ful is by no means unknown to the American system of government, but it is hard to be charged with “pack ing” the District government with relatives when you haven’t the power to appoint them if you wanted to. That’s howr it appears, at any rate, to William McQueeney, superin tendent of public school custodians, who was cited in the report to the House Subcommittee on Appropria tions as having 15 of his family in the employ of the District. “Yes.” chuckled McQueeney, who entered the custodial service some 46 years ago and has been superin tendent since 1931, "you might think I was running a small spoils system here.” It would appear from his title, he went on, that he was appointive power for janitors and could dis tribute positions at will. “Actually,” he said, “a custodial appointment is a long process cul minating in the Board of Education. Applications are made through ml. I send them to the first assistant superintendent in charge of the business office, who sees the candi dates and makes recommendations to the superintendent. Dr. Ballou then presents them for investigation by the Personnel Committee of the Board of Education, which then makes recommendations to the board.” Many Took Exams. Speaking of his 15 relatives, many by marriage, McQueeney said that anyhow nearly half of them were in the service before he was made cus todian superintendent even if that position had carried the appointive power—and what’s more, many of those got their jobs through competi tive examination or through appoint ment from a rated list. "If I were a really good nepotist I would certainly have taken care of my immediate family, don’t you think?” he continued, pointing out that none of his large family was in any way connected with the gov ernment. "I guess it's just a case of family interest in a certain field that made them want to get Into the school sys tem,” he said. “My brother Hugh, j*t whose request I entered the system at a $500 a year janitor because of an acute need for custodians in 1891, died in the service after 47 years in it. My younger brother had been a cus todian 31 years when he died.” Four Are Sons of Brothers. Four of the eight nephews in the school service charged to McQueeney are sons of the twro brothers. The other four are sons of two of his three sisters. He acquired three more con nections with the District government by his own marriage, two of his wife's sisters being teachers and -a brother later becoming a custodian at a local high school. A niece married and her husband, connected with another branch of the District government, was also listed as a relative of the custodian chief. “If there’s any blame," said Mc Queeney, “I am perfectly willing to take it. But frankly I don’t under stand it. There’s no law affecting us that I know of which limits the num ber of related people in the District government if they possess the quali fications necessary for the job and are appointed by the regular appointing power." ---• STEAMSHIP LINES BILL SIGNED BY ROOSEVELT Private Management Extension Beyond Marine Act Deadline Becomes Law. Bt the Associated Press. President Roosevelt signed yesterday a bill authorising the Martime Com mission to extend the private manage ment of five Government-owned steamship lines beyond the deadline originally set by the 1936 merchant marine act. Operation of the lines by private management was ordered discontinued in favor of a charter system by June 29, 1937, under the merchant marine act. The new bill permitted the commission to continue the existing arrangement as long as "advantage ous,” terminating it “as -soon as prac ticable” after December 31. The companies Involved are the American Pioneer Lines, the America France Line, American Hampton Roads Line-Yankee Line, tfic Oriole Line and American Republics Lines. CTHE opinions of the writers on this page are their own, not necessarily The Star’s. Such opinions are presented in The Star’s effort to give all sides of questions of interest to its readers, although such opinions may be contradictory among themselves and directly opposed to The Star’s. ^ Labor Debate Not Over New Phase of Commotion Due to Start With Decision on Wagner Act. BY MARK SULLIVAN. THE next phase of the commo tion in which America is in volved will begin when the Supreme Court hands down its decision on the national labor rela tions act, frequently called the “Wag ner act.” Much of Washington ex pects the decision next Monday, though, of course, it may not come until later. The decision, whenever it comes, will deal directly with the constitutionality of the Wagner act. But indi rectly it will, in public discussion, have a relation to ‘'sit-down" strikes, to Mr. Mirk Sullivan. Roosevelt’s pro posal to change the Supreme Court, to the proposals to amend the Con stitution. The bearing of the decision on these matters may not really be as vital as discussion will make it seem. But for several days following the Wagner act decision there will be the kind of discussion that followed the decision of last week on the mini mum wage act of Washington State. The central purpose of the Wagner act is to legalize the principle of collective bargaining by labor, and to safeguard labor in the practice of it. To that end the act requires that employers shall bargain collectively with their workers. It forbids em ployers to interfere with the organiza tion of unions, or to discriminate against members of them. Under the act, when a majority of the workers in a plant have joined one union, or have otherwise selected representa tives, then the employer must bargain with those representatives exclusively. There can be only one bargaining union in each plant. Board Can Hold Elections. For administering the act a ‘‘Na tional Labor Relations Board” is set up. This board is an official Gov ernment body. Among other func tions, the board can hold elections in factories to determine which of two or more unions is to represent the workers. When workers or unions have ocoasion to complain against an employer, they make their complaint to thus board. Thereupon the board holds hearings, takes testimony, and hands down a decision. Ordinarily the decision is an order to the em ployer that he shall re-employ dis charged men, or bargain collectively with a specific union, or do whatever else the board thinks should be done. If an employer fails to do what the National Labor Relations Board or ders, then the board can go before a United States Court and ask the court to require the employer to carry out the board’s order. It is in this way. the cases now before the Supremr Court have come up. There are five of them. The cases have different sets of facts. For describing what the Wagner act is, help may be had by outlining, very sketchily, one of the five cases the court is about to decide. The case of the Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. may be taken as typical. The facts as given here are taken from the brief of Attorney General Cummings representing the National Labor Re lations Board before the Supreme Court. Union Complained to Board. Certain workers at one of the Jones & Laughlin plants, acting through their local union, complained to the Labor Board that Jones & Laughlin ‘‘had discharged or demoted employes because they had joined the union, in order to discourage membership therein." Jones & Laughlin re plied that the discharge and demo tions had been made “because of in RAILROADS DRAFTING EMPLOYE AID PLAN Labor Negotiators Join in At tempt to Provide New System. By tlie Associated Press. Informed officials said yesterday railroad officials and labor negotiators are trying to draft a broad new sys team of unemployment compensation for the Nation's 1,000,000 rail workers. The program is being formulated in conjunction with a voluntary rail pension system, officials said. It would lift the railroads out of the unemploy ment benefit system embodied in the social security act. Committees representing rail man agement and labor recently announced agreement on a new pension plan to be operated under the Railroad Re tirement Board. The Treasury raised objections, however, contending tax ing provisions were not adequate. The program is being restudied by Treasury, Retirement Board, railroad and rail union representatives. CONFEDERATE VET DIES Gen. Alfred Ayer, 90, Last in County to Pass On. OCALA, Fla., April 3 {!P).—CHn. Al fred Ayer, 90, Marion County’s only remaining Confederate veteran, died here today after a brief Illness. He was Marlon County tax assessor for one 20-year period and previously had served as a Representative in the Florida Legislature. Bom at Barnwell, S. C., Ayer left the South Carolina Military Academy when he was 18 years old to Join the Confederate Army. He was a former commander of the Florida Brigade of tlje United Con federate Veterans. RUPTURED NOW GIT BLESSED RELIEF with amai ln*. modern Invention, boon to mankind. No harsh steel bands, back-pads, flimsy elastic belts, lei-straps. Neat, comfortable, sanitary, durable. Unlike anythin* else you ever sew. Pronounced by users "The greatest achievement of all times.” j Don’t say "It’s no use." Get convincing ! FREE TRIAL. Make every conceivable test, then decide. The surprise of a lifetime awaits you. Just ask the desk clerk for Mr. I Watson et the Houston Hotel, Washington, Monday and Tuesday. April 5 and 6. from . 10 to 13 a.m. and 1 to 5 aiufc 6 to 8 PM. i If • ou cannot call write for See literature 20A. FAULTLESS APPLIANCE*CO.. Haver hill. Mas*. efficiency and violation of the com pany’* rules.” / Apparently the question of fact thus brought up was never tried out. The company did not present testimony. Apparently the company preferred to base Its contest on the constitution ality of the Wagner act. The National Labor Relations Board held that 10 of the 12 workers had been “discharged because of their union activity.” The board ordered the company to "reinstate with back | pay the 10 men" and to cease "from discouraging membership in the union.” Then the board asked the United States Court to require the company to do what the board had ordered it to do. Prom the lower court the case came up to the Su preme Court. The Supreme Court decisions, when they come, will have their greatest importance In what the court says about the distinction between "in terstate commerce” and, on the other hand, commerce within a single State, "intrastate commerce.” The Consti tution say* that Congress can legis late only about the former, "inter state commerce.” The court in the past has interpreted this in a way which President Roosevelt regards as too strict. The New Deal would like to have Congress permitted to legislate on practically all commerce, business and Industry, as the N. R. A. statute tried to do. Wide Range in Five Case*. As respects interstate commerce, the five cases before the court present a wide range. The Jones & Laugh lin case is that of a steel manufac turer within a State which sells its products outside. The case of the Washington. Virginia & Maryland Coach Co. is that of a bus company which crosses State lines. The case of the Associated Press is that of an organization which operates both locally within a State and also across State lines. The cases of the Frue hauf Trailer Co. and the Friedman Harry Marks Clothing Co. are those of manufacturers within a State. From this variety of conditions the court might hand down different de cisions on the different cases. Aside from presenting the court with occasion to state its position— either its old position or a new one— about what constitutes interstate com merce, the decisions on the Wagner act will not have great influence. The current commotion about labor ques tions has passed into a new phase. The Wagner act. though passed as recently as July 5, 1935, is more or less historical with respect to labor questions. The act had practically no p>art in the recent labor incidents in Michigan. Almost all thoughtful per sons on both sides of the question believe that in the light of the recent "sit-down" strikes, new legislation will be necessary to define both the rights and the responsibilities of both labor and employer. (Copyright. 1937.) We, the People Failure of Gen. Blanton Winship and Dr. Ernest Gruening in Puerto Rico Charged. BY JAY FRANKLIN. THE Puerto Rican police machine-gunned a political parade In the city of Ponce, killing 7 and wounding 50 Nationalist demonstrators for immediate and unconditional Independence. The Governor of Puerto Rico—Gen. Blanton Winship—and the director of the Di vision of Territories and Insular Possessions in the Department of the In terior—Dr. Ernest H. Gruening—ought to resign at once as a result of this scandal. If they fall to do so voluntarily the President should call for their resignations. Between these two officials the New Deal in Puerto Rico seems to be failing, and our island territory is being converted into "the Ireland of the Caribbean’’—the weak spot in our "good-neighbor” policy” in Latin America and a discredit to our national program for peace ful readjustment and reform. These words are written with a heavy heart. I share same of the responsibility for setting up the Puerto Rico Reconst ructi«n Administration under whiih the New Deal undertook to cure the evils or aDseniee capitalism m me great sugar centrales which dominate the political and economic life of that lovely Island# Gen. Winshlp is a personal friend of long standing. Dr. Omening I know as a practicing liberal, an expert on Mexico and a crusading editor against the “power trust." Fine men, both, but with the best intentions in the world they have not succeeded in their assignment and should be removed from the Puerto Rican picture without delay. Last year Col. Riggs, the popular and sympathetic chief of the Puerto Rico police, was assassinated by two young Nationalists. The crime was committed precisely because Riggs was popular, because he understood, liked and was liked by the Puerto Rican people. The Nationalist agita tion thrives on mutual suspicion and hatred and they strove, by the murder of Riggs, to end the era of good feeling which our reconstruction plan and New Deal sympathy at Washington had engendered. Now the Nationalist plot is succeeding. For the police lynched the two young assassins in their cell at the police station—an official crime which not only diverted sympathy from the victim of the assassination but wfiich destroyed the only evidence that could have established political responsibility for their desperate action. Since then, "treat ’em rough!" has been the Winship-Gruening policy. They have thus played into the hands of the Nationalist extremists and have discredited many of the Puerto Rican leaders of intelligence and good will who had favored co-operation with the American authorities. The climax came when the Governor re voked the permit for the parade already authorized by the mayor of Ponce and the police and paraders came into inexcusably bloody collision. Here we have an island possession which, under a protective sugar tariff and modern sanitation, has produced a greater population than can be supported in independence. Capital investment in Puerto Rican sugar is mainly American and is directed through such institutions as the National City Bank and the Bank of Nova Scotia. The sugar estates have been built up in violation of the organic law which limits cor porate ownership to a maximum of 500 acres of land, and the profits of the industry are retained in the United States. In addition, tarifl protected prices for manufactured goods, coastwise shipping regula tions, etc., further drain the island’s wealth. The people are poor, pronnc, hard-working, intelligent—with a high order of Spanish culture, a civilized tradition and an intense pride in their racial individuality. They do not want to be assimilated to us or our ways. Hence the P. R. R A and hence the honest effort to give the * island a New Deal, against the will of the sugar companies and the ' mouldy vestige of "the white man’s burden’’ in certain sections of our public opinion To allow ourselves to be diverted into political repression on the ■’Black-and-Tan" order of police atrocity, because an American official was murdered by extremists, is to scuttle the New Deal and restore the spirit of that "gun boat policy” which we have formally abandoned in the Caribbean. So Winship and Gruening should be replaced, temporarily, by a com missioner with broad powers at San Juan—some one of the Frank Murphy type (perhaps Representative Maverick of Texas could suggest some one for the job)—and by a man of proved diplomatic ability in charge of the Bureau of Territories and Insular Possessions at Washington. Some one like Mr. Norman Armour, our present Minister to Canada, would be ideally qualified, although there are men in the Latin-American division of the State Department who could also do the Job. Later on. of course, the Gov ernor should be a native Puerto Rican—6ome one like Dr. Chardon. former chancellor of the University of Puerto Rico. (Copyright. 1637.) An American You Should Know Isador Lubin Declares Facts Can Keep U. S. From Straying. BY DELIA PYNCHON. WITH more and more strikers either walking out or sit ting down, it is evident that we must get down to “bare bones" or facts. Isador Lubin, commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Department of Labor, says that his “fundamental philosophy Is I»»dor L.Mn and at Clark Uni versity. He taught economics at the University of Missouri. In 1918 he came to Washington as a statistician under Hoover in the Food Administration to find out how many laborers would be available to harvest the Government's extensive war-time wheat fields. For six months he was a special expert on the War Industries Board. Subse quently he returned to the teaching profession at the University of Michi gan. In 1922 he was one of the origi nal staff members of the Brookings Institute. They loaned Lubin as ad viser to the Senate Committee on Education and Labor. He sponsored unemployment insurance at this time. Since 1933 he has headed the Labor Statistics Bureau, and has effectively lived down a "brain truster” grouping, through quiet and efficient adminis trative ability. Commissioner Lubin's facts and fig ures are very much in the public eye these days of strikes and rumors of strikes. From New York to San Fran cisco the telephone rings constantly seeking labor data. There is obvi ously a co-operative spirit abroad in the country. Employers have volun tarily submitted data on conditions in 90 industries. Both Mr. Lewis and Mr. Green have the "capitalism psy chology," Lubin says, and want to work together to defeat Communism and Fascism. Muddling through on a guess work economic program gets business nowhere, Mr. Lubin thinks. If we had known the facts in 1927 the depression might have not borne down on us so heavily. Briefly this data that the commis sioner dispenses "gratis" includes im portant figures on employment and pay rolls with illuminating gains and lossas reported in each. In December, 1936, factory employment rose 6.9 per cent and pay rolls 15.5 among about 39 manufacturing industries and 16 non-manufacturing, a scope large enough to be representative. Since 1933 lndustxy'fia# taken on 6,500,000 workers. that people who have facts don’t go astray.” Com miss loner Lubln, youngish, short, nervous, competent, has not strayed very far from facts throughout h i s career as teacher, adviser, statisti cian, economic expert. Born In Worcester, Mass., he had his early II <7Tto/ Cmtptuu/ 1 \i\ mi ll' Iin1 * - U Hi Hi Ml fl vim w^mmiiuimr For Sunday night’s supper... old-fashioned baked beans and brown bread. The secret is “balance” ... just enough of everything ... not too much of anything. It is the same thing that makes the workman’s lunch a source of strength and energy during the longest afternoon. It is also the secret of brewing good beer ... the kind that is charac terized by Senate Beer . . . that gets beer-lovers together, no matter how divergent may be their opinions about politics, baseball or foods. CHR. HEVRICH BREWING COMPANY H 1 W&SHINGTONyp.C.