Newspaper Page Text
THE EVENING STAR With Sunday Moraine Edition. WASHINGTON, D. C. FRIDAY___April 9, 1937 THEODORE W. NOYES_Editor The Evening Star Newspaper Company. Uth St and Pennsylvania A$e. New York Office: 110 East 42nd St. Chicago Office: 436 North Michigan Ava. Rate by Carrier—City and Suburban. Regular Edition. The Evening and Sunday Star 65c per month or 15c per week The Evening Star 45c per month or 10c per week The Sunday Star_ _5c per copy Night Final Edition. Night F nal and Sunday Star__ ,70c per month Night Final Star___55c per month Collection made at the end of each month or each week. Orders may be sent by mail or tele phone National 6000 Rat* by Mail—Payable in Advance. Maryland and Virginia. Daily and Sunday_l yr.. $10.00; 1 mo . 85c 1 Daily only _1 yr.. $rt.OO; 1 mo., 50c Sunday only_ 1 yr.. $4.00; 1 mo., 40c AH Other States and Canada. Daily and Sunday. 1 yr., $111.00; 1 mo. $1 00 Daily only_ _ 1 yr.. $8.00; 1 mo, 75c Sunday only _ 1 yr$5.00; 1 mo.. 50c Member of the Associated Press. The Associated Press Is exclusively entitled to the use for ^epublication of all news dispatches credited to it or not otherwise credited in this p*pcr and also the local news published herein. All riRh s of publication of special dlspatchea herein are also reserved. Fresh Spanish Tension. Although after five months of the siege of Madrid military conditions have never been so favorable for the Loyal ists, the international aspect of the Spanish civil war has suddenly taken on new tension. It is the consequence of Italian charges that the French general staff has flagrantly intervened in the strife by sending a general and twenty five officers actively to direct operations of the government armies, including an imminent large-scale offensive. Recent rebel defeats northeast of Madrid and on other fronts are attributed in Rome to the fact that Loyalist operations have passed under the supreme control of the Paris war office, plus the alleged circum stance that extensive French and Rus sian military equipment, especially pow erful aircraft and field artillery, has latterly been placed at the disposal of the Madrid-Valencia authorities. Categori cal claims of high-powered French inter vention are put forth in newspapers known to speak Mussolini's mind. They are coupled with a sweeping indictment that both France and Russia are now openly violating the non-intervention agreement. Paris is persuaded that this officially inspired Italian outburst springs from two causes—first, from remorse over the crushing repulse of blackshirt forces at Guadalajara, and, secondly, from a desire for a plausible pretext to dispatch Fascist reinforcements to bolster Franco's tot tering fortunes. Whatever the motive, Italy's accusations and alarms amply in dicate that the Spanish fire is by no means divested of the danger of flaming Into a European conflagration. Musso lini is chafing bitterly under the blow to Italian military prestige. He is strongly suspected of hankering for an opportunity to avenge it by sending the Insurgents enough additional troops to turn the tide in their favor. Reported Impending arrival of Gen. Goering, the German air minister, on a second visit to Rome is associated there with Italo German plans to wipe out the stain on the Fascist escutcheon. Any substantial move in that direction would almost cer tainly provoke Anglo-Franco-Russlan hostility, and perhaps even counter measures. At the moment these developments within Spain are aggravating the inter national situation, the insurgents find themselves in conflict with Great Britain over an air attack on British warships near the Island of Mallorca. The Medi terranean fleet has been instructed to awing into instant action in the event of further molestation, and destroyers have been detached to protect British ship ping. Ever since Mussolini’s spectacular expedition to Libya and proclamation of his "protectorship" over Islam, British suspicions of Italy's underlying interest in Spain—to augment Fascist power in the Mediterranean—have been height ened. Altogether, the tragedy that turned the peninsula into a shambles has once again assumed a phase threat ening the peace of all Europe. A1 Smith’s devotion to orderly govern ment is well known. The people like to hear him talk, but his views are being so ably expressed far and wide that he may have taken a trip to Europe under the impression that radio just at present does not need him. No Need of Park Cross-Cuts. Before any serious consideration is given to the project of establishing a series of through traffic routes across Rock Creek Park—whether by dikes or bridges—an exhaustive study should be made of the traffic conditions which it has been suggested are such as to re quire this trespass upon the public res ervation, one of the most attractive and valuable features of the Capital. Such a study would unquestionably disclose that there is no urgent need for such straightaway short-cuts at the expense of a large percentage of park area if dikes were created. As has been already stated, by far the greatest volume of traffic at present is north and south or parallel to the general lines of the park. The park roads are undoubtedly used to a great extent for convenience because the roads there permit an uninterrupted flow of traffic. Those who now use the roads do so largely because of the com fort and ease of park driving in a set ting of beauty that is not equaled any where in the world in the vicinity of a large city. To carry this traffic across the park transversely by either dikes or bridges would doubtless facilitate the movement of vehicles, but those using such routes would deny themselves the pleasure that is now derived from passage through scenes of sylvan beauty. As for the proposed dikes or embank ments for carrying the roads, which it is alleged are necessary foj the accom modation of transverse traffic, it is to be borne in mind that these embankments would require Immense fills of earth of great area at the base in order to assure stability. These fills would encroach upon the park space in terms of scores of acres, utterly destroying a large part of the forest growth the preservation of which was one of the specific purposes of the establishment of this reservation. Even bridges, however artistically de signed, would intrude upon the scene de structively and in complete inharmony with the general setting. The cost of any form of transverse roadmaking would be enormous, by fill or by bridge construction. No estimate has thus far been attempted of this ex pense. The District, which would have to bear the greater part of such a cost, has not sought and will not seek such a perversion of the park space for a du bious advantage. The best course would be to cut the item out of the District bill. If the subject is considered as of sufficient importance to warrant an in quiry into the need, let there be an authorisation for a study which will em brace not only the engineering features of the plan but the actual conditions which are now—it is to be believed er roneously-advanced as warrant for this innovation, which is close to vandalism. Mr. Ford and the Unions. When Henry Ford makes the flat declaration that "we'll never recognize the United Automobile Workers’ Union I or any other unions" he is not defying merely John L. Lewis and the C. I. O., but all organized labor as well, and, in a sense, the laws of his country. Sit downs aside, the right of workers to or ganize and to gain recognition for pur poses of collective bargaining is plainly established and generally supported, not only by the statutes and the courts, hut by public opinion. Mr. Ford may rely for the present, on a belief that his own workers would prefer to remain free of union affiliations and that even under the Wagner act the union cannot command in his plants that majority which the law recognizes as the agency for collective bargaining. But it is inconceivable that the tide of unionization now’ sweeping the country, aided not only by the spirit of the times but by the force of Government policies in Washington, will leave Mr. Ford's plants high and dry, like islands in a flood. It may take a year, or two years or ten years before the unions can claim the strength of a majority in the Ford plants. But ten years is not a long time in the life of what the present labor movement portends. As a categorical refusal to recognize any union, Mr. Ford's statement is Injudicious, as time will doubtless show. There are at least two considerations, however, which enter into study of Mr. Ford's policy. He is, first, in a much stronger position than his competitors in the automobile business to withstand the siege of a sit-down, if he has to contend with that illegal seizure of his property. There is a story that has been going the rounds recently of a mythical notice from Mr. Ford to his employes: "I can sit down for two years; how long can you sit down?’’ There may be sub stance to the thought if not to the story. Mr. Ford is not responsible to thousands of stockholders. His empire is scattered over the world. He is not tied up with his old friends, "the bankers.” He can probably sit down himself about as long as any industrialist in the world can sit down. The union organizers know’ this and no move for a sit-down in the Ford plants will be undertaken without some assurance of success. The sporadic strikes Which temporarily closed down some of his plants were doubtless due to impetuous action by subordinates, and were not in accordance with union strategy. The other consideration is that public sentiment, despite the Senate's straddle on the issue, is plainly set against the sit-down strike and the longer one con tinues, the more untenable becomes the position of those who condone it, wheth er it be the union chieftains or the ad ministration guardians at Washington. That has been indicated in the case of the General Motors and the Chrysler strikes. The sit-downs came to an end in time to prevent the show-down that the union heads, as well as the watch ful politicians in Washington, were anxious to avoid. The time may come when Mr. Ford will be challenging not only the poten tial sit-downers in his plants, however, but the Government at Washington. And the ability of the Government to move specifically against him would depend, in turn, upon the forthcoming court decision in the Wagner cases. If they are upheld, Mr. Ford spoke too soon. If invalid, he will, for the time being, retain the upper hand. There is the possibility, of course, that Mr Ford and his company might choose, if faced with that alternative against the surrender of his principles, to shut up shop permanently and to go out of business. That possibility is fantastic, indeed. Mr. Ford is a man of strong convictions. But if it ever came to that, he would doubtless live in history as King Pyrrhus II. Some of the comments on the U. S. Supreme Court seem inclined to contem plate it as a new and startling discovery, without feeling sure whether to go after it with a microscope or a telescope. Peculiar Amish. The Amish are peculiar. In many curious ways, their neighbors in Penn sylvania agree, they are “different.” For instance, their clothing habitually is shapeless and colorless. They make a fetish of monotony in appearance. Personality is a factor which they dis count in favor of a least-common-de nominator type of social conformity. They exist according to regimen and rule—with every detail of conduct and manners provided by a philosophy of drastic simplicity. But they seem to be happy. Visitors to Lancaster County And them con tented with their lot. They labor tlre > lessly—and the result is prosperous farms; they are rigidly conservative— and the harvest of their traditional independence is a degree of social har mony and progress rare in any country in any period of history. Years pass without the placidity of their valleys being even temporarily disturbed. Not long ago, however, a New Deal serpent invaded their Eden. The Federal Government offered them sixty thou sand dollars for the construction of a so-called "consolidation” school. Most communities would have been delighted with the proposal. But the Amish are peculiar. It happens that they object to borrowing. Debt is a thing they abhor. Also, they are possessed of a passionate prejudice against being ob ligated to strangers. They have been self-sufficient for generations, and even in a season of general distress they wish to continue so to be. To take money on any terms from President Roosevelt would violate their religious convictions. What they can earn, they want; but nothing else than the proper reward for their hire will they consent to re ceive. At the moment, a delegation of elders is appealing to the courts for protection against the grant they have rejected in conference assembled. The spectacle leaves their fellow citizens gasping. But little can be done about it. The Amish are peculiar. A sit-down strike attracts Interest be cause of a novelty in terminology. It is related to the old stand-up strike as the ancient horse and buggy is related to the modern automobile. The same appli cation of power to overcome the ltw of gravitation is involved. The chief ques tion is one of technique with incidental embarrassments through the Intrusion of the human element. Base ball players go to the highest bidder, but they enjoy life without fear of any Simon Legree to chase them across the Ohio River on floating cakes of ice. Their fate is never so harsh as to diminish their personal enthusiasm when the President of the United States follows the time-honored custom of toss ing out the ball at the opening game. A plain thinking and yet an eloquent man of unostentatiously studious habit, Thomas Jefferson's own opinion of the idea of destroying the cherry blooms in order to make room for a marble classic memorial in his honor would be worth while if there were any means of de ducing it from his writings. The Dionne quints have reflected honor on Doctor Defoe. His ideas for rearing children to a safe and happy maturity are interesting and his pro teges should esteem it a debt of grati tude to demonstrate the correctness of his precepts for development into mature life. Attack on the Supreme Court did not measure the fact that each of its mem bers is a popular figure on his own ac count, recognized before appointment for legal knowledge and for devotion to the cause of humanity. Shooting Stars. BY PHILANDER JOHNSON. Neglected Slogan. Where is that motto that was shown In the old days, so swiftly flown, That sought the best and feared the worst— That admonition, “Safety First!" Men risk their hearts in frail romance, On fortunes vast they take a chance. We see our hopes like bubbles burst And give no thought to “Safety First." In vanity the braggarts shout While common sense is ushered out. Strange foibles soon may be dispersed, As we recall plain “Safety First.” No Filibuster Inspiration. “Do you feel inspired to make a speech?” "Not just now,” answered Senator Sor ghum. "There is no legislation offered which I feel the slightest interest in delaying.” Jud Tunkins says when you get past the First of April you wish in vain that this one day could render the rest of the year foolproof. The Merciless Mike. My Radio! My Radio! To you I am a debtor, As you enable me to know My . neighbor somewhat better. You let me hear by his own voice Of all his kindly measures To help this weary world rejoice In simple well-earned pleasures. Although my neighbor you exalt, You make sad revelations Of grammar now and then at fault And mispronunciations. “Only those should seek to look down on the world,” said Hi Ho, the sage of Chinatown, “who are willing to climb to the mountain top where it is cold and lonely.” Silenced Authority. “Do you enjoy listening to the radio?” “Yes.” answered Mr. Meekton, “espe cially if Henrietta is by my side. It is a pleasure to find a number of persons expressing opinions with which I agree without her being able to talk back.” Pride of Authorship. How strange is the misguided man Who to bring proof will undertake That his mistakes are better than The kind the other fellows make. “Don't tell me about de songs I learnt at my mother’s knee,” said Uncle Eben. “Wheii I was acrost her knee I was hollerin’ so loud I couldn’t have heard her even if she was keepin’ time to music.” k 1 THE POLITICAL MILL BY G. GOULD LINCOLN. The House of Representatives yester day voted to table the Dies resolution for an investigation of the sit-down strike—a companion piece to the Senate action a few days ago when that body defeated the Byrnes amendment to the Guffey coal bill denouncing the sit down strike. The unwillingness of the administration to go on record in con nection with the sit-down strike is held by many persons to be the reason for the defeat of the Dies proposal in the House and the Byrnes amendment in the Sen ate. After the exhibition of adminis tration strength in the Senate, which de feated the Byrnes amendment, it was clear that the Dies resolution, calling for an inquiry into sit-down strikes, might not only have hard sledding in the House, but might well be defeated. It was de feated, although a direct vote on the resolution was avoided by the device of a motion to lay it on the table. * * * * The Dies resolution had been reported favorably by the House Rules Committee, although administration leaders had sought to prevent such action. With the backing of the powerful Rules Com mittee, a resolution usually does not have much trouble getting through the House. The House leaders expedited considera tion of the resolution, which had a privi leged standing, as having been reported favorably by the Rules Committee. The rank and file of the House, however, not only understood that the administration, represented by the President, had kept a hands-off policy in the sit-down strike issue, but also believed that the House leaders were lukewarm to the Dies reso lution. It did not take much, under these circumstances, to prevent favorable action on the resolution. The charge was made that the anti sit-down strike resolution was being fos tered by Republicans and by anti-New Deal Democrats. These seemed to put a cap on the whole controversy, and the resolution was doomed. The opponents of the resolution also issued a warning that if the Representatives voted for it they had better watch their step—that they would suffer when next election rolls round. It was too much. The ‘'lib erals" in the House on general principles opposed the resolution, which called for an investigation of labor leaders’ activi ties, although Mr. Dies, the author, in sisted that it was to ascertain whether the employers also had had a hand in fomenting these disorders. * * * * Representative Harlan of Ohio, Dem ocrat, was effective in the debate, de claring that the Republicans—particu larly those who wished to succeed Dem ocratic members of the House—would benefit by the passage of the Dies reso lution and the ensuing Investigation of labor in Northern cities. In fact, he made it clear, to some of his colleagues at least, that the Republicans would ben efit a great deal from Democratic dis sensions. A row over the sit-down strike, with the President and a minority of the Democrats on one side and the Republicans and a majority of the Dem ocrats on the other, on this or any other question would be a hard blow for the Democratic party. And so the party issue was forced into the sit-down strike row. But underlying it all is the fact that the administration has insisted upon keeping a hands-off policy. It is per fectly apparent that had the administra tion taken an open stand against the sit-down the Dies resolution would have gone sailing through the House. * * * * Mr. Harlan said to the House, com menting on the Dies resolution: "It is very poor politics. I am going to talk now to the Democratic side of the House.” And he continued in this vein: "There are certain members on our side of the House whose political success does not depend upon whether or not there is a national Democratic party. Most of us, though, who constitute this great majority, come from sections of the country where conditions are such we do not want questions of this kind needlessly stirred up for political capital, and that is all there is to this. Why is it that the other side of the House is almost unanimously for this resolution? It seems to me when you cannot find the leadership of our party back of a resolution, and you find the opposition solidly in favor of it, you ought to want to look into the common sense of it. You ought not to have to look very close ly into that rat role for poison.” ♦ * * * After the Dies resolution had been tabled. Representative Warren of North Carolina, who had made the motion to table, sought to bring up for considera tion the concurrent resolution, which the Senate has just passed, which calls sit down strikes illegal, but seeks to placate the sit-downers with a declaration against the use of spy systems by employers and another declaration denouncing those employers who do not fall in line with the Wagner labor relations act. Withrow and O'Connell of Montana objected to the unanimous consent asked by Warren and nothing was done about the matter. It is expected, however, that the Senate resolution, which has apparently not aroused the opposition of the adminis tration—and which had the support of the administration leaders in the Senate —will eventually be adopted by the House. ± * * * The manner in which the sit-down strike resolutions and amendments have been defeated in House and Senate may not be directly connected with the fight over the President’s bill to increase the membership of the Supreme Court, but at least there is a strong implication that the President can have his way in both Houses. After the Senate had turned down the Byrnes amendment denouncing the sit-down strike as illegal by a vote of 48 to 36, it seemed to many persons pretty clear that the President will be hard to beat on the court issue, although the alignment of Senators will not be just the same. Senator Borah of Idaho, for example, stepped out against the Byrnes amendment, but is a strong opponent of the plan to increase the membership of the Supreme Court. But, taking it by and large, the manner in which the administration was able to line-up Senators against the Byrnes attack on the sit-downers seems indica tive of what may be expected when the court bill comes up finally. * * * * The sit-down strike, a violation of the rights erf the owners of property—and of other persons who wish to work—does not stop there, it is apparent from what happened the other' day at Hershey, Pa. Another group, the farmers and workers who did not care to give up their jobs in the Hershey plant, also violated the law, beating up and ejecting the sit downers. Both groups were culpable. But if the sit-down strike is to be con doned by the officials of government, it may easily happea that others, ill-affected by such strikes, will take the law into their own hands, just as the sit-downers have done. Incidentally, the sit-down strike may stir up feeling against labor on the part of farmers elsewhere, if persisted in where the farmers are counting on selling their products. A sit-down strike of large proportions in peeking plants, r THIS AND THAT MY CHARLES E. TRACEWELL. A dry, dusty Spring A most unusual season it had been before the rain, but still the leaves were uncurling on the shrubs and the flshln’ worms coming up to light and air. Normal rains bring ’em up, but this year tne dryness seems to have had the same effect. Three living creatures are fond of the worms—the robins, the fishes and the human interested in fishes. There are two species of humanity, in this regard, the fisherman, who wants to fool the fishes with worms, and the aquarlst, or aquarium enthusiast, who wants to feed them with worms. There is no better "live food” for all types of fishes, both goldfish and tropical specimens, than this same earthworm. Smaller specimens may be fed to all fishes larger than guppies; large ones need to be pulled into pieces, except when fed to large goldfish and the largest of exotic specimens. Since the stomach of the earthworm contains vegetable matter, the fish which eats it gets both animal and vegetable food. A mixed diet is best for practically all animals, evidently. * * * * One of the truest signs of Spring is the leaf of the Virginia bluebell, now pushing its way through the soil. This small favorite does not come into bloom until early May, but it is an almost infallible sign of the season. By the time it bursts into its little flowers, it will be Spring beyond doubt; the first leaves already apprise us of the season. Usually there is distinctly more of a Springlike •feel” in the air than this. Moisture is essential to this feeling, but Spring may come without it, even though everything happens to have been dry before. There is moisture in everything. It is at the heart of all fiber. Living things may last a long time without having an added supply. This is possible because there is a hidden intelligence in all things. This intelligence begins to conserve mois ture for its purposes, once it realizes that the supply is not normal. That is why rhododendrons, for in stance, curl up their leaves when the temperature drops below 25 degrees above zero. These plants will survive an entirely dry Summer, such as was experienced hereabouts in 1930. The leaves will be too dry and yellow The ground will be so baked that it will be cracked all around them, with real fissures showing. Still, the plants will survive, because Nature has a way of utilizing what moisture is left in the tissues of the plants themselves. * * * * Those earthworms which came up in such numbers that cloudy morning were doing so. without doubt, because in their queer intelligences they realized that the day was cloudy. They were, in other words, seeking moisture. They do not like their habitat too moist, but neither do they prefer it dry. Their constant rustling through the soil, according to researches, ameliorates the world s topsoil. Without them, some claim, there would be no agriculture as we know it. Certainly the robins, fine birds, would be hard put to it to live without them. Nothing in bird observation is more in ---- te resting than the sight of a fine robin seeking Its dinner In the grass. What wonderful fellows these robins are! No one ever saw a puny robin, a robin with a headache, or even a robin with a stomach ache. Each specimen Is perfect. It may be that Nature never made a sickly robin. Surely It would be hopeful to believe that in some one department of life and living, at least, she turned out a perfect race. When we contrast the beautiful birds, each one as like its ancestral type as can be, with the sickly specimens of humanity which are observable on all sides, we may wonder why it Is that animals so tend to be perfect and man so Imperfect. Go to the Zoo and see the lions and tigers. Though caged away from the good earth, which they love, confined so that their great muscles get practically no exercise, they nevertheless seem as lithe end supple as any specimens could be. Maybe they are, although they have their ailments, too, without doubt. Authori ties say that caged animals are, in a sense, better off than uncaged ones and have a better chance to live long. Preed of the necessity for constant watchful ness, they soon grow accustomed to their new lives. Cats, including the domestic sorts, easily form habits. These habits may be entirely at variance with the ancestral patterns, but grow to be no less strong, In a few years. * * * * In an exceptionally dry Spring, such as this had been at the time this was written, it may be necessary to use the old hose. Surely few amateur gardeners look for ward with any pleasure to the use of the garden hose too early. Normally that is necessary only in the middle of Summer, when hot suns and lack of rain combine to dry out the soil. This season winds have taken the place of hot suns. A good wind has a very drying effect, as every one knows. Often the amateur gardener does not stop to realize how winds may dry out the soil to a considerable depth. Thus a season of coolness, combined with winds, can do more to dry out the earth than warmer and hotter days. It may be necessary, then, to unlimber the garden hose ahead of time, if the season has been such as to cause the ground to become baked, when normally ! it would be moist. Many persons have a bad habit of really not watching soil conditions. Ask 1 them, on a cloudy day, when rains seems eminent, whether the ground is moist, they take their cue from the skies, evi dently, and declare it is, not only without thought, but even without looking down at the ground. Actual Inspection of the earth is essen tial. This is the only way to know whether a garden is dry or moist. Look ing at the clouds won't do! It is neces sary to look at the earth, and then to act on what one sees. If the ground is really dry, no matter what the month, in Spring, it should receive water. This especially applies to grass and particularly to newly seeded areas. Grass seed will not germinate in dry soil. And after watering has once begun on such plots it must be kept up, unless, of course, adequate and seasonable rains follow. Artificial watering is never as good as the real thing, but often enough it is much better than nothing. WASHINGTON OBSERVATIONS BY FREDERIC WILLIAM WILE. One current explanation of White House reluctance to condemn the sit down strike is that labor groups closely identified with the C. I. O. have become the spearhead of the campaign to popu larize the Roosevelt Supreme Court plan. The burden of the drive rests on the broad shoulders of Labor's Non-Partisan League, in which John L. Lewis is one of the controlling spirits. The League is about to hold a series of Nation-wide mass meetings on behalf of the bill. Culminating on “Patriot's day,” April 19, practically every Important city in the country will be the scene of demonstra tions to whip up favorable sentiment. The opening gun will be fired at Chi cago tomorrow. Other places in which later meetings will be held are Bir mingham, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Denver, New Haven, Atlanta, Indianap olis, Des Moines, New Orleans, Balti more, Kansas City, Boston. Detroit, Minneapolis, St. Louis, Omaha, Pitts burgh, Philadelphia, Nashville and Houston. Speakers already announced include Senators Black of Alabama, La Follette of Wisconsin, McKellar of Ten nessee and Gulley of Pennsylvania, Rep resentatives Connery of Massachusetts, Patman of Texas and Eicher of Iowa. When Labor s Non-Partisan League met in Washington on March 8, to lobby en masse for the Judiciary scheme, Maj. Berry stated that its purpoee was to come to President Roosevelt's “res cue,” just as it had cleared for action to save the New Deal in 1938. Under imprint of the “Public Infor mation Committee,” which is supposed to derive its authority and sinews from the Democratic National Committee, a 15-page pamphlet entitled “Who Bald That About the Supreme Court?” has just left the press. It reproduces va rious utterances by Chief Justice Hughes, Justice McReynolds, Senators Wheeler of Montana, Borah of Idaho, Glass of Vir ginia, George of Georgia and Tydlngs of Maryland, and four one-time Presidents of the United States—Lincoln, Wilson, Theodore Roosevelt and Taft—all pur porting to show that the authorities in question, both living and dead, once espoused views in line with Franklin D. Roosevelt’s judiciary reform project. * * * * Many authorities, both in the admin istration and Congress, are beginning to reflect anxiety over the hamstringing of the legislative program by the court con troversy. A vast array of urgent public business—which F. D. R. insists should be called “ought” and not “must” leg islation—is sidetracked while proponents and opponents of the judiciary bill maneuver and counter maneuver. Meas ures affecting Industry, agriculture, ship ping and revenue—only to mention out standing propositions—await the break ing of the log-jam now drifted into its third month. The President, of course, can say the disentangling word any time he pleases. Apparently he looks upon court reform as a paramount condition precedent to further development of the New Deal. Until it is out of the way, slow motion at the Capitol is the order of the' day. 'vf * * * * Foraier, ©overnor Gifford Pinchot of Penn llvsnia has just returned from North" ©arollna where he inspected the earliest systematic forestry in the United States—at the Vanderbilt estate, Bilt more. That tract, then of 7,000 acres, was taken in Hand in 1803 under Pin flour mills or factories manufacturing prepared foods is not going to sit well on the fanner. chot's direction as consulting forester. The governor was anxious to see the effect on the forest after almost 50 years. He finds that it still shows in striking degree the results of the earlier cutting, which not only improved the timber stand, but also paid for itself and a little more. From that humble start, Mr. Pinchot says, scientific forestry in this country has spread until the need for it is now universally recognized. The gov ernor is hard at work in his Washington home on a monumental book dealing wdth the long fight for conservation in America and his lifetime connection with it. * * * * While Washington is host to the an nual throngs of cherry blossom pilgrims, Tokio is abloom with the 4.650 American trees presented to the Japanese people by the Garden Clubs of the United States. Consisting of mountain lilacs, dogwood and other flowering Yankee trees, they were formally presented to Japan in February by Mrs. Joseph C. Grew, wife of the United States Am bassador. The trees, which adorn one of Tokio’s famous parks, were intended both as a return gift for the cherry sap lings presented to Washington by the Mikado during the Taft administration, and as a token of appreciation of hos pitalities extended in Japan to touring delegations from the Garden Clubs of this country. * * * * When Secretary Hull asked the House Appropriations Committee the other day to approve the State Department budget for the fiscal year 1938, aggregating *13, 234,968, he trotted out figures comparing the cost of Uncle Sam's “Department of Peace” with other executive branches. State's budget is lower than that of any other department—less than half what Justice costs; only 3 7/10 per cent of the Navy budget, and 3 4/10 per cent of the War Department’s appropriation. State gets approximately only a tiny one-fifth of one per cent of Uncle Sam's current total appropriations. “It is worth while to keep these figures in mind,” said the soft-spoken Tennessean, “for in the realm of international affairs the De partment of State is the first line of de fense. It is only when it fails in its efforts to adjust by peaceful means con troversies with other nations that the hillitary and naval branches of the gov ernment are called into action.” * * * * All Washington is agog over the duel between those twin titans of industry and labor—Henry Ford and John L. Lewis. Already it's dubbed the capital labor battle of the century. Betting odds on the outcome are about even, with a slight preponderance of view that the magnate who for all these years has successfully defied both organized labor and high finance will come out on top in the unionization combat. * * * * Coincident with the effort of the ad ministration David to slay the Goliath of high prices, including steel, that giant Industry has just issued statistics de signed to show that the rise in steel costs exceeds revenue increased by new prices. Advances in wages and materials are said to total *215,000,000, while prices are up a mere *200,000,000. Steel em ployes are stated to earn 140 per cent above the average foreign wage, with annual pay rolls at a new peak of $!, 055,000,000. Pay in American mills dtff lng the last year ran from 81 to 740 per cent above wages in eight foreign coun tries. The present hourly average of 83% cents here compares to eight ceits in Japan and 37 cents in France. Great Britain comes next with 34% cents. (Coprrlcht. 1037.) A ANSWEIS TO QUESTIONS BY FREDERIC J HASKIN. A reader can get the answer to any question of fact by writif The Evening Star Information Bureoi, Frederic J. Haskin, Director, Washington, D. C. Please inclose stamp for ■eply. Q. How many police ratio stations ara there In the United States—B. F. A. Current reports show jg7 municipal and county police radio stations in operation. Q. How deep is the sal mine near Geneseo, N. Y.?—H. M. A. The Retsof Mine of the Iiternational Salt Company is 1,063 feet below the surface of the earth. It is rached by a cage which drops this dista.ee in less than a minute. Q. What is the Ringling Cirus worth? —L. M. A. It is spoken of as a $4,000)00 show. Q. How long will the giant :park be which is to be shown at the Hris Ex position?—M. P. A. This spark will be nine feet In length, between two metal sphees nine feet in diameter. It takes a d;charge of five million volts to produce his gi gantic spark. Q. How many members has the Jockey Club?—H. L. A. The membership of this go^rning body for racing is restricted to fiftu Q. How- many people visit the ;Vorld War battlefields in France each year? —V. G. A. About 300,000. Of these vsitors about 70 per cent are French; Begian, 10 per cent; German. 5 to 6 per -ent; British about 3 per cent; Ameican, under 1 per cent. Q. What college holds the Culural Olympics?—H. J. A. They are under the auspices ofthe School of Education of the Univemty of Pennsylvania. Q. Please name several of the at standing works of the late Frederick W. MacMonnies.—J. H. A. Some of the best-known works of the famous sculptor are the statue of Nathan Hale in City Hall Park, New Yck City; the groups on the Soldiers a.d Sailors’ Memorial Arch, at the entrane to Prospect Park in Brooklyn: the Prino ton Battle Monument at the head >f Nassau stretit in Princeton and tie Marne Memorial Monument at Mean, France. Q. How many criminals are there n the United States? Of these, how maiy are under 21?—C. R. A. There are 3,500,000 known criminas in the United States, of whom 700,00 are under 21 years of age. Q How much has the Navy Depart ment spent on lighter-than-air craft? —M. A. M. A. It has spent approximately $43,000 000 on lighter-than-air craft since ; began to use this type of aircraft. Tl» figure includes cost of hangars, etc., a well as cost of the aircraft. Q Please give some information abou the castle in Franklin, Me.—K. L. A. Theodore P. Austin, a New Yor jeweler, Invested heavily in gold an copper mines of Hancock, Sullivan an. Blue Hill during the Maine mining boon He purchased 6,000 acres in Franklin am on it erected a forty-room mansion will a stone observation tower, a *25,000 stabl and other buildings. The mining boon collapsed and he died before the housi was finished, leaving carloads of ex pensive furniture and ornaments in thet packing cases. The house was left ti his two daughters, Altea who is ove" seventy today, and Neva who is sixty three. Both sisters live in the hous* which remains just as it was left sixt' years ago, without interior finish. Q. Were Gilbert and Sullivan knightel at the same time?—P. L. A. Sullivan was knighted by Queen Vic toria in 1883. The Queen did not approvi of Gilbert, however, and he did not be come Sir William until 1907 when Kin; Edward VII gave him the title, sevei years after the death of his collaborator and four years before his own death. Q. Is there a machine with which i man operating a keyboard in one cit’ can set type simultaneously in othe’ cities?—G. T. B. A. There is such a machine, known ai the teletypesetter. Q. Please give some information abou; Grimaldi, the famous clown.—E. W. A. Joseph Grimaldi, the most cele brated of English clowns, was bom ii London on December 18, 1779, the sor of an Italian actor. When less than tw« years old he was brought on the Drur Lane stage and at the age of three hi appeared at Sadler's Wells. As the clowi of pantomime he was considered withou; equal, his greatest success being ii "Mother Goose at Covent Garden.” Hi retired in 1828 and died on May 31, 1837. His memoirs were edited by Charle: Dickens. Q What is the most popular comi< strip?—J. W. A. According to a survey conducted bj Fortune, Little Orphan Annie is the mos popular comic strip, while Popeye h second. Q. Who was it who said of Washingtor that he was the President who knew nc glory but his country’s good?—T. G. V. A. Edward Everett. Q How much sap does the averag« maple tree yield?—B. B. R. A. About eight gallons. When this it boiled down it makes about three pounds of maple sugar. A Safe Sit-Down. From the Fort W»yne New«-Sentln«;. Two Bloomington, HI., wives staged a sit-down strike for Easter clothes. Evi dently they were not concerned over any harm that strikebreakers might ac complish. A Rhyme at Twilight By Gertrude Brooke Hamilton. Nightfall. The sunset had been gorgeous; vivid rayi Trailing to rose tints in the Easterr sky; As the sun sank a vagrant breath oi wind Wandered among the tree tops with a sigh. Then came the night. On dense, mys terious wings It swept the heavens of each crimson bar; While thru its darkening pinions then shone forth. Detached and beautiful, a single stai L »