Newspaper Page Text
DUPONT CIRCLE MEMORIALS Statue of Admiral and Later Fountain Have Been Notable Orna ments to Section of City Associated With Center of In fluence in Higher Development. By John Clagett Proctor. HERE are many places in Wash ington ' that but few people know anything about, and it Is quite likely that only a lim ited few, even of the old-timers, could tell you where once was lo cated Pacific Circle, although under another name it is still in the same place, right in the heart of the city, its present name being Dupont Circle, which will be readily recognized by •very one. Back in 1R82, when it was pro posed to erect a statue of Rear Ad miral Samuel Francis Dupont in this circle. Congress thought that the name of this reservation should be changed to the name of the man whose statue was to grace the in closure, and this was accordingly done It took a few years to get the red tape unwound, of course, and to have the statue made, and finally the day for unveiling arrived. And this day was December 20. 18M. It was bitter cold, the Potomac being frozen over ] all the way from Washington to Alexandria But this did not prevent j President Arthur and many distin guished guests from braving the ele- j ments. though it does seem that a I different time of the year would best j have been selected for an event of this kind "The piercing wind," says an old j account, "which blew up the broad converging avenues and across Du pont Circle yesterday made the pom pous ceremonies of unveiling another statue seem more perfunctory than ever. The stand was prettily draped by the Wyandotte and Dispatch sail ors. and some of the neighboring res idences had been gay in honor of the event. The President and cabinet were somewhat tardy. When thev appeared on the platform the bugle corps of the Maine Band played the usual welcome, which was immedi ately followed by Rossini's 'Stabat Mater' by the full band, with cornet iolo by Jaegar. It was a grand per formance and brought forth merited applause. /\ ο auuiN ai me music had died away, Secretary Chandler stepped to the front of the grand stand and said: 'We have assembled to honor the memory of one of the naval heroes of the War for the Union. Samuel Francis Dupont, who enured ' the Navy in 1815 as a boy of 12 end died in the service in 1865, a rear admiral. His faithful labors for his country, his patience, dignity and lovalty under trying circumstances, end his important achievements in battle against the enemv have made his name illustrious. The Congress has ordered that his statue shall be here erected, an enduring memorial of his virtues, his valor and his patriotism.' "After the remarks of Secretary Chandler, he called upon Rev. Dr. Leonard, who was dressed in full epis copal robes and offered up a fitting prayer. Immediately after the prayer, two sailors, stationed on either sid° of the pedestal, seized the ropes that 1 held the covering around the statue and at the signal pulled them away, the appearance of the figure being greeted by a salute from the military and applause of the spectators. "As soon as the applause died away Secretary Chandler introduced Sen ator Bayard of Delaware as the orator j of the day. It took the Senator just one hour and 10 minutes to deliver his address, he standing all the time uncovered in the intense cold. The spectators, especially those on the j grandstand, were the pictures of de- i spair. the cold making their faces | appear in all sorts of shapes and grimaces. Secretary Frelinghuysen vas the only member of the cabinet who retreated, retiring early from the scene, but the rest of the gathering withstood the blast and the snow that fell toward the close like so many veterans. "At the conclusion of Senator Bayard's address the Marine Band struck up 'Hail to the Chief.' while a rear admiral's salute was fired from the artillery stationed on Ρ street. The military parade consisted of the Marine Battalion, with full band and bugle corps, commanded by Col. Mc Cauley and Lieuts. Harrington. Nichol son and Turner, a detachmpnt of ëailors from the Navy Yard supplied with cutlasses and Dupont Post, No. 2. G. A. R, of Wilmington, Del., under charge of Comdr. Emmons. Most of the Army and Navy officers on duty here were present in uniform, as were also many diplomats." ELL, it is surprising what a change in sentiment a few years will brin? about, and so we find that in less than 37 years the statue of Admiral Dupont, then considered en artistic achievement, was taken down and removed from the city and In its place was erected a white marble fountain, upon which are fleures rep resenting the sea, the wind and the itars. Of course, no one with an eye for the beautiful could other than praise this memorial as a work of art, espe cially when we know that Daniel Chester French, who made that mar velous statue of the Great Emanci pator in the Lincoln Memorial, was also its sculptor. Henry Bacon the architect and that Piccirrilli brothers xrere the marble workers But this Is there arxl speaks for itself, while the heroic bronze fitrure. formerly on the site, is probably in one of the Parks of Wilmington. Del., where The Star, at the time of its removal, said tt would be placed. The statue, placed in the circle in 188*. was the work of Launt Thomp son. an artist of rare ability, of whom It has been said: "Another sculptor of great ability ewes his first instruction in the plas tic art to Palmer—Launt Thompson. He was a poor lad, who early showed art instincts, but was employed in the office of Dr Armsby, until Palmer stated one aay that h· was in search of an assistant, and asked Dr. Armsby if he could recommenld any one. The doctor suggested Thompson (who was In the room) as a youth who had a turn that way, but had been unable to find opportunity to gratify his art cravings. Thus began the career of one of our strongest portrait sculptors. In the modeling, both of the bust and the full figure, Thompson has been equaled by# very few of our sculptors. Among many successful works may be mentioned his Napoleon. Edwin Booth, Gen. Sedgwick, at Weet Point, and President Pierson, at Yal· College." ' The coat of thia atatue was 120.500, this amount being appropriated by congress. The cost of the fountain that replaced it was somewhere be tween $75,000 and $100,000, which was borne by the Du Pont family. At the unveiling exercises of the latter the Marine Band was also present, as it had been in 1884. and among its selections played Nevin's "Narcissus." Right Rev. Alfred Harding, D. D., Bishop of Washington, gave the in vocation; Mrs. Bruce Ford, the ad miral's granddaughter, pulled the cord, while the Secretary of the Navy, Edwin Denby, made the formal address. rpHE removal of the old statue Is said to have been because it be came an eyesore to a member of the Du Pont family. An unusual reason, if true, for if it were unworthy of a place in Washington, why set. it up in Delaware, to offend some one else's vision? However, as we look at the matter j from the sidelines, perhaps it would have been better to let the statue ι remain in Washington, where it would ha\e been seen by so many thousands ι of visitors annually, for, after all. | there are many naval officers whose j history is as brilliant as his, though ι their service may not have covered ! quite as many years and their an cestral background not so important. Admiral Samuel Francis Dupont was born at Bergen Point, N. J., September 27, 1803, and died at Phila delphia, Pa . June 23, 1865. In 1815 President Madison appointed him a midshipman in the Navy, his first service being a voyage to the Med iterranean in the Franklin. During the years 1821 and 1822 he served aboard the Constitution, being later | attached to the Congress. In 1842 he was promoted to commander, and in 1845 assisted in perfecting the or- | ganization of the newly founded Naval ; Academv. On the outbreak of the Mexican War he was sent to com mand the Cyane, and toward the beginning of the Civil War was ap pointed flag officer and ordered to the command of the South Atlantic blockading squadron. Perhaps hia greatest achievement in this war was when, in conjunction with Gen. Thomas W. Sherman's land forces, he captured the forts at Port Royal Entrance, S. C., and Tyber Island, at the mouth of the Savannah. Thus Port Royal became the great depot for the Union fleet. In this engagement, we are told, the ships described an ellipse between the forts, each vessel delivering its flre as it slowly sailed by, then passing on and another talcing its place. The line of this ellipse was constantly changed to prevent the Confederates from get ting the range of the vessels. His attack on Charleston, April 7, 1863, did not, however, end so glori ously, and his attempt to run the fortifications at the entrance to this city ended in a disastrous failure, when he was repulsed with consid erable loss. Shortly after this, on July 5. 1863, he was relieved from command. DESIDES the fountain, erected here to his memory, a fort was named for him during the Civil War, and part of the earthworks still denote the spot. It is Just about on the southeast Dis trict of Columbia-Maryland line where it Is crossed by the Marlboro road. Be ginning at the top of Good Hope road, where was Fort Wagner, the other forts, extending on a line to Fort du Pont, were Fort Baker, Fort Davis and Fort Caton. Admiral du Pont was the third son of Victor Marie du Pont de Nemours, who was born in ''aris. France. Octo ber 1, 1767, and died in Philadelphia, Pa., January 30, 1827. He In turn was the son of Pierre Samuel du Pont de Nemours, French economist. Victor Marie du Pont settled in Louvier, Del. and became one of America's outstanding manufacturers. His father, Pierre Samuel du Pont de Nemours, who was born in Paris, De cember 14, 1739, died at Eleutherian Mills, near Wilmington. Del , August 7, 1817. He is stated always to have been an ardent advocate of the cause of American liberty, and when the time was ripe for peace overtures be tween this coufitry and Great Britain, toward the close of the American Rev olution. to have been entrusted by the Count de Vergennes with the delicate mission of conducting the secret nego tiations with the English representa tive, Dr. Hutton. which culminated in the peace treaty of 1783, by which Great Britain acknowledged the Inde pendence of the United States. He was also instrumental in pro moting the treaty of 1803. by which the Unfed States purchased Louis iana. However, like Lafayette, his trials In his own country were great, and upon one occasion he barely escaped the guillotine. After the re turn of Napoleon from Elba, he was forced to flee to the United States, where his two sons had already be come citizens. (")NE could hardly speak of Dupont Circle without saying a word about some of the notable buildings that surrounded this well known park, especially the pioneer of them all Stewart's Castle, erected in 1873. by Senator William M. Stewart, at a cost of about $225.000, with furnishings costing $100.000 more. On December 30. 1879, it was severely burned, with a loss estimated at $30,000. The last owner of the ."castle," which stood on the site where is now the branch of the Riggs National Bank, was Sena tor William A. Clark of Montana, who removed the building in 1901. The home of James G. Blaine, can didate for the presidency in 1884. and who was defeated by Grover Cleve land. is still standing to the west of the circle. The permit to build the house was issued on June 8. 1881. the estimated cost being placed at $48,000. John Fraser was the architect and Robert Davidson Co. the builders. The "Plumed Knight," as Blaine was called, resided in this house but a short while, when, in 1883, he leased it to Levi Z. Leiter of Chicago for five years at an annual rental of $11,000. During Blaine's residence here the house was the center of much social gavety. On January 1, 1891, it was damaged by fire to the extent of $15. 000. Later, on May 26. 1899, George Westinghouse. jr., of Pittsburgh, bought the property and resided there for some years. During the World War it became the home of the Officers' Club, and in 1921 it was sold by Westinghouse to Henry B. Spencer of this city. At the time the property was sold the con sideration was mentioned as being $90.000, and it was then described as having a frontage of 127 6 feet on Ρ street. 69 6 feet on Twentieth street, and 116.6 feet on Massachusetts ave nue. It «as further stated: "The house is constructed of brick and is four stories in height, and contains many large rooms, including a spa cious reception nail on the main floor, flanked by numerous living and dining rooms." After vacating the Blaine house. Mr. Leiter built the mansion at 1500 New Hampshire avenue and here his daughter Mary resided when she mar ried the Hon. George Nathaniel Cur zon, in St. John'* Church, Sixteenth and Η street*, April 22, 1895. T^HE Patterson house, at No. 15 Dupont circle, is. no doubt, the most Important residence in this neighborhood, particularly so because it *-as occupied in 1927 as the tem porary White House, during the mak ing of repairs to the Executive Man sion. At the time it was taken over by the President, The Star said: "The old Patterson home is one of the. finest of the many mansions to be found in the Dupont Circle sec tion of Washington. Stately in archi tecture. of Italian influence, from the outside, it is even more gorgeous in side. It contains 30 rooms, all of them large and comfortable, and 10 baths. An elevator runs from base ment to top floor. "The house has four floors and is built of white stone, and was designed by the late Sanford White. It is com pletely detached. This feature is un derstood to have had considerable ■ influence in causing this house to be picked by the President for the tem porary White House. They wanted a home that had plenty of light. Thire were other houses that appealed, but were not selected because they are not detached and because their con struction did not. permit sufficient day light to enter the rooms." It was during Mr. Coolldge's resi dence here that Col. Charles Lind- j bergh and his mother, Mrs. Evangeline Lindbergh, were the President's guests, folowing the return of Col. Lindbergh to this country after his memorable flight across the Atlantic. It was from the balcony of this house that he waved a greeting to the throng which gathered in front of the house to shout his praise. Lindbergh, as will be recalled, as a boy, spent much of his time in Wash ington while his father was serving in Congress as a Representative from Minnesota. In 1907, when he first came to Washington, the senior Lind bergh took up his residence at 1831 V street northwest. For some un known reason this place did not seem to suit his fancy, and in the following year he had moved to 1726 Willard street. For his whereabouts after 1908. the City Directory must be depended upon, and this gives his 1910 address as the Congress Hall Hotel, located at New Jersey avenue and C street south east, where formerly stood several buildings owned by Thomas Law. the corner one of which was his residence, j Mr. Law had married Elizabeth Parke [ Custis, granddaughter of Martha j Washington, and it was to their home that the first President paid visits wrhen in this city. The House Office Annex now occupies this site. rpHE Laws did not get along in perfect harmony, and ere long the property was leased to Conrad Λ McMunn for hotel purposes, and it was here that Thomas Jefferson re sided while Vice President and from here also that he marched with an escort το the Capitol to be sworn in j as President in 1801, when some folks say he rode up the Avenue unaccom panied and hitched his horse to paling fence and returned to the White House after the ceremony, in the same democratic fashion; but' of course this statement does not apply to his first inauguration. The next place we find Representa tive Lindbergh is at the Hotel Dris coll, First and Β streets northwest, where he stopped in 1914. The direc tories do ηόι give his address for 1915 and 1916, but during his la.'*, year in Washington he stepped at the Continental Hotel, corner of North Capitol and Ε streets. That Col. Lindbergh received much of his education In Washington thete is little doubt. Besides attending the Friends School, he attended also the Eastern High School in the period oi the 10 years his father serve", in the Lower House. The Patterson mansion is the resi dence of Mrs. Eleanor Patterson, pub lisher of the Washington Herald. It was constructed in 1901 and 1902. The cost of the building was esti mated at $164,000, the building bein·; done during a period of low prices. ! The site was acquired for $83.000. j The extra refinements which went j into the building cost $164.000, among these being the wainscoting for the ι library, costing $6.000; interior dec orative features, $10.000. and marble ] for the hall and stairway, $10,000. Tne mansion at the time it was occupied by Mr. Coolidge was assessed at ap proximately $450,000. It was built by the George A. Fuller Co. and is still one of Washington's most beau tiful mansions. JT WOULD, indeed, be quite difficult for any one to visualize what Du pont Circle and that vicinity of tne ! city looked like in the early days of Washington, or, to come down to more recent times, when Stewart Castle was built in 1873, unless, in the la^- ι ter instance, the person looking back ward into the past was willing to con fess that he was an old-timer and could recall John Hopkins' brickyard, at Twentieth and Ρ streets, which was operated as late as 1875, though Mr. Hopkins, a Georgetown man. died in 1858, the business probably being car ried on after that date by his heirs. Old Slash Run. still remembered by many, touched, in its zig-zag course, within a block of the circle. This stream, sometimes also called Shad Run, was still an open stream in many places when many still living were youngsters. Its source was some where in the vicinity of Fifteenth street and Columbia road, and the odor arising from the insanitary slaughter houses which lined its banks was very unpleasant in warm weather, as the city became gradually more congested. Some of the early slaughter houses included those of William Linkms, Frank Linkins. John Pfeaster, John Berry, George Walker. John Hoover. John Little and others. But nature had made this a picturesque stream and it had its attraction as well as its detraction. It entered the city by crossing Florida avenue at about Eiehteenth street. A feeder which joined the mam stream in the center of square 156. between Seventeenth and Eiehteenth, Ρ and Q. added to the size of the branch as it wended its way southeasterly to near Sixteenth and L streets, where it zie-zaeeed west to Twenty-second street and flowed into Rock Creek at a point between Ν and Ο streets. "Guy Graham," so an old item states, "was the pioneer settler of the Dupont Circle neighborhood." and was one of those who rut the mad from the Capitol to the Treasury, now designated Pennsylvania avenue. In his day, and for manv years after ward. there was good swim m me alon? Slash Run, which would embrace to day one of the most important parti of Washington. At one time the stream was evi dently qui'e large, and quite old a:, well, for on several occasions when excavations have been made along it', course tree trunlts and vegetation of an early period have b^en found, sometimes 20 feet below the earth i * surface. Statue of Rear Admiral Samuel Francis Dupont, for merly in Dupont Circle. It iras dedicated in 1884 and removed in 1921. Stewart's Castle, erected by Senator William M. Stewart of Neiwda in 1873 on the northwest corrier of Connecticut avenue and Dupont Circle, west of the Leiter home. Λ Home erected by Levi Z. Leiter at 1500 New Hampshire avenue, Dupont Circle, prior to 1895. TRADITION AGAINST THIRD TERM HAS FACED MANY ATTACKS First President's Final Decision Has Maintained Influence in Long History of National Politics, But Hard Battles for Change of Policy Have Been Fought Out. By Herbert Hollander. | IT'S In again, the hardest peren- ! niai in American political life; and everywhere throughout. the country the question is being asked: "Will Franklin D R<iosevelt seek a third-term nomination, or per mit himself to be 'drafted'?" Regardless of White House pro nouncements. or lack of them, between now and 1940. it is clear that the question will be answered definitely and finally only at the nominating convention in the Summer of that year. In the meantime—again regardless of what President Roosevelt says or does not say on the subject—third term talk will grow in volume and intensity. That, history shows, has happened often before. On many occasions since the Inception of the country, the public !ms become profoundly agitated over the third-term Issue. And it is noteworthy that while sen timent generally always has been clearly opposed to a third term, those who have sought to break the prece dent by no means have been devoid of supporters. President George Washington's in fluence. probably more than any other single factor, has given unshakable strength to the anti-third-term tradi tion. There Ls nothing in the Consti tution to prevent one President from remaining in office for more than two terms, and strong third-term move ments have appeared in behalf of several Presidents. rpHE nearest approach to outright third-termism occurred In 1880, when supporters of Ulysses S. Grant were able to muster more than 300 votes on 36 ballots at the Republican convention in Chicago. Grant already had served two terms. Then came the Hayes administration —after the Tilden-Haves election had nearly precipitated a second civil war —and the Grant men, under the leadership of Senator Roecoe Conk ling of New York, saw an opportunity once more to capitalize on the gen eral's great war record and reinstall him in the White House. (As a mat ter of fact. Grant would have been willing to run for a third term In 1876, but failed to receive the support then that he was to gain for the effort four years later.) Despite the corruption and malad ministration during Grant's two terms, he still was popular personally, and Conkling persuaded him to allow hi- name to come before the conven tion. But not all of the political astuteness of Conkling, nor the loy alty of his henchmen, nor even the promise of bigger and better spoils, could overcome the traditional oppo sition to a third term. Λ After days and weeks of bitter bat tling. a compromise was reached, Grant was ditched and Garfield be came the nominee. When Grant received the news of his defeat, he spoke bitterly of his managers. Chagrined and humiliated, he said: "They never should have permitted my name to come before the convention unless they were sure of victory." On the day Grant was placed in nomination for a third term, Repre sentative Springer of Illinois intro duced a resolution in Congress ex pressing opposition to more than two terms for any President. The reso lution was adopted by a wide margin. A similar resolution was Introduced In Congress, and also adopted, as re cently as 1928. Its author was Senator Robert M. La Follette of Wisconsin, and the occasion was the issuance by Presi dent Coolidge of his famous "I-do not-choose-to-run" statement. It will be recalled that there were many in the country who favored Coolidge for another term, insisting—as Theodore Roosevelt himself did earlier—that he had been elected but once, and that the other term came merely as the result of succession iollowlng death. ^y/HETHER or not Coolidge carefully designed his statement, as a strad dle—and there is no reason to believe he did—his supporters for a third term were numerous and highly ar ticulate. To choke that off. La Follette in troduced his resolution, which, after several days of stinging debate, was j adopted by a vote of 56 to 26. The La Follette resolution, as in- I trodured, read: "Resolved, that it is the sense of the Senate that the precedent estab- : lished by Washington and other Près- | idents of the United States retiring j from the presidential office after their ! second term has become, by universal concurrence, a pert of our republican ! system of government, and that any departure from this time-honored cus tom would be unwise, unpatriotic and fraught with peril to our free institu tions; and be it· further "Resolved, that the Senate com mends the observance of this prece dent by the President." The latter paragraph was dropped off as the resolution was finally adopted. ]^OT so well known as George Washington's refusal to accept a third term is a statement made by him in 1778 in a letter to Lafayette, in which he declares himself em phatically against limiting the presi dential tenure of office. At that time he wrote: "There are other points in which opinions would be mone likely to vary, as, for instance, on the eligibility of the same person for President after he should have served a certain num ber of years. Guarded so effectively as the proposed Constitution is in respect to the prevention of bribery and undue influence in the choice of President, I confess I differ widely from Mr. Jefferson and you as to the necessity or expediency of rotation in that office. * · * I can see no pro priety in precluding ourselves from the services of any man who on some great emergency shall be deemed, .uni versally most capable of serving the public." This statement is quite as explicit as Washington's later action in re fusing the proffered third term. Did he change his mind during the suc ceeding years, did he not deem him self longer worthy, or desirous, of the office, or did he not consider the emer gency pressing enough to justify con tinuance in the presidency? What ever the answer may be, it was Wash ington who, wittingly or unwittingly, set a precedent which has had far greater weight and «way than law ltMlf. In 1788 Jefferson discussed the question in s letter to Alexander Don ald, as follows: "There Is another strong feature in the new Constitution which I as strongly dislike. That is the perpetual re-eligibility of the President. Of this I expect no amendment at present, because I do not see that anybody has objection to it. But it will be productive of cruel distress to our country, even in your day and mine." Perhaps Jefferson's prediction has not been borne out fully—although Grant certainly suffered "cruel dis tress" when the Chicago attempt failed—but there is yo gainsaying that the third-term issue has been a perennially live, and usually bitter, one since the very beginning. QN NUMEROUS occasions in our history, Congress has taken cog nizance of the question. Resolutions limiting the presidential term were up in 1828, 1829, 1830 and 1832. All were defeated. Jackson, in a message to Congress, urged such a change. In 1833 and in 1835 constitutional amendments were offered, and in11844 tiré Whig platform contained a strongly worded plank pledging such an amendment. Again in 1844 and in 1846 constitutional amendments were offered in Congress, but nothing was accomplished. After the real third-term scare of 1880 there was renewed demand for some statutory limitation, but again no action was taken. Previously, in 1871 and 1872, there had been considerable agitation in favor of a single term for the Preei. dent. As a matter of fact the single term idea lw been put forward frequently In the pa«t 150 years, be ginning with the Constitutional Con vention itself and continuing up to the present. The question of presidential tenure was a subject of intensive debate in 1787 when the Constitution was being hammered into form, and the present provision Is the result of η compromise —as Is virtually every other part of that document. Two proposals first were discussed most seriously, namely, a three-year term with eligibility for re-election and a seven-year term without eligi bility. The first vote was for a sever>-year term without re-eligibility, the second vote was for a seven-year term with eligibility, and on a third vote a reso lution was adopted providing for a seven-year term for the President of the United States without eligibility for re-election to that office. However, the convention was not yet done with the question, for the entire matter then was referred to a committee of 11. representing each of the 11 States represented in the con vention. This committee, after long and careful consideration, voted to recommend a four-year term without reference to eligibility for re-election. This recommendation was accepted by the convention and became part of the Constitution. As to qualifications, the Constitu tion simply specifies that the President must be a natural born citizen, he must have attained the age of 35 years and he shall have been a resident of the United Statee for 14 years. ' V\7HEN Theodore Roosevelt ran for President in 1912 on the Pro gressive ticket. against President Taft and Gov. Wilson, he had a strong anti-third-term sentiment to contend with, despite his heated claim that he was running for the presidency, not the third time, but the second time. The first time he ran for the vice vice presidency with McKinley. suc ceeding to the White House on the latter's death. The same argument was used, not by Coolidge himself, but by those who wished him to run again in 1928. Many probably have forgotten It, but Wilson is known to have desired a third nomination in 1920, despite his unfortunate physical condition, in order to win from the country a repu diation of the senatorial "irreconcil ables" who had wrecked his plan for American participation in the League of Nations. If Wilson had not been so crushed in body, there is held to be the strongest evidence that he would have made a characteristically vigorous fight for another nomination and another opportunity to go before the country on his record. There was only one President who declared at the outset of his first administration that he would take but one term and held by his resolution. He was James Buchanan. 65 years old at his inauguration. Only Wil liam Henry Harrison, 68, was older among all the Presidents when taking office. While there is little likelihood that Buchanan could have been re elected, it ia noteworthy that he did not «eek renomination, thus keeping hie still unique pledge. OPPOSITION TO THIRD TERM REVEALED BY LONG HISTORY f^EORGE WASHINGTON set the as yet unshattered -pre cedent against third terms for American Presidents. Yet in a letter to Lafayette in 1778, Washington said that "I can see no propriety in preclud ing ourselves from the services of any man who on some great emer gency shall be deemed universally most capable of serving the pub lic." But Jackson declared himself strongly opposed to more than two terms: Congress on numerous oc casions has so resolved: Grant failed in 1SS0 in the boldest and most nearly successful bid in our history for an outright third nomination: and Theodore Roose velt could not convince, the coun try in 1912 that he was not run ning for the third term. These and many other facts, many of them little known, be ginning with the heated debates in the Constitution Convention on Presidential Tenure, are con tained in the accompanying article, rendered timely by the Nation-wide interest in President Franklin D. Roosevelt's 1940 in tention*. Third-term jinx. This typical cartoon, by Nelson Harding, published in 1911 by the Brooklyn Eagle, foreshadowed Theodore Roosevelt's presidential candidacy the following year on the Pro gressive ticket. LIST FAMOUS WOMEN American Ladies Who Are Called Great Come From Every Imaginable Profes sion, According to Publication. By J a tttps Waldo Fawcrtt. MORE than 1.000 American women deserve to be regarded as famous. Such is the finding repre sented in the latest publication of the Division of Bibliography of the Library i{ Congress. The book. a.s yet avail »ble only in mimeographed form, was "ompiled by Miss Florence S. Hellman. icting chief bibliographer. It brings jp to date a similar but much less comprehensive study made in 1932. The list begins with Eleanor Hallo veil Abbott, author, and closes with Lucia Zora, circus star. In the subject index there is an ittempt at classification, but tne edi xir stipulates that "it is not intended is a complete analysts of the careers if the women" included. Actresses, clubwomen, composers, editors, educa ors. Government officials, humani arians, illustrators, journalists, lec ;urers, missionaries, novelists, nurses, philanthropists. poets, reformers, social service workers, wives of famous men ind wives of Presidents are grouped irbitrarilv "merely as an aid to locate material relating to the various pro fessions." A glance over the contents record shows one animal trainer, Mabel Stark; one anthropogeographer, Ellen Churchill Semple· on* "stunt girl.J Olive Hatch; one botanist, Jane C'I den: one chemist, Ellen Henrietta. Swallow Richards; one cabinet officer Frances Perkins; one financier, Hett; Howland Robinson Green: one Gov - ernor. Nellie Tayjoe Ross; one Mormon poet. Eliza Roxey Snow ; one mountain climber, Annie Smith Peck: one mor ologuist, Anne Newport Royall; or» markswoman or "sharpshooter," Ann:» Oakley; one pho'oerapher, Margaret Bourke-White; one Girl Scouts leader, * ' Juliette Gordon Low, and one violin ist, Maud Powell. ' Ç^THER hracket.s are: Abolitionist5, archeologists. art patrons, astron omers. business executives, civic work ers. Congresswomen. dancers, drama tists, engineers, entomologists, ethnolo gists. explorers, foundresses, historians, home economists, hymn writers, judges, labor leaders, lawyers, mothers of noted persons, naturalists, organizers, painters, physicians, pioneer women, religious leaders, screen stars, sculp-, tors, singers, suffragists, surgeons, translators and welfare workers. No less than seven spies are men j tioned—Lydia Barrmgton Darragh and Fanny Bullock Workman, 'real" daughters of the Revolution: Belie Boyd and Rose O'Neil Greenhow of ί the South, and Paulme Cushman, ! Emma Edmonds and Elizabeth van ' 1 Lew of the North. A courase like that required in war time is also manifest in the case of two women described as "parachute , jumpers." Tinv Broadwick and Phoebe Fairgrave Omlie. But women meriting the adjective "indomitable." are numerous Miss Hellmnn applies the word to Annie Pike Greenwood of "We Sagebrush Folks": Mrs. Evelyn Harris, "the bar ter lady": Mary Kidder Rak. "a cow man's wife"; Katharine Ball Ripley of "Sand in My Shoes": Eleanor de la Verene Doss Risley, heroine of "An , Abandoned Orchard." and Mrs. Hilda Ra«e of "The Stump Farm " Some of the names are unfamiliar. For example, who would guess that Mary Ludwig Hays McCauley conceal» Molly Pitcher of the battle of Mon mouth? Or Helen Louise Leonard the glamorous Lillian Russell? On the other hand, many of the names need no explanatory introduc tion. Lydia Pinkham. perhaps, was the most widely celebrated woman of her generation She still is known to millions of people who probably never " have heard of Martha Washington or Helen Keller. j rr,HE list serves to bring back to pub lic notice a few "forgotten ladies" who ought not to be lost. Emma Iîz arus. the unhappy American "sister" of Thomas Chatterton, is a case in point. Another is Rose Hawthorne Lathrop. daughter of the writer of "Twice Told Tales"—she abandoned the world to devote herself to the care of patients suffering with incurahle cancer and, as Mother Alphonsa, earned a place in any proper Hall of Fame of which it is possible to con ceive. Miss Hellman's purpose has been * eminently prartiral. She has under stood that people are interested pri marily in their contemporaries To meet the current demand, therefore, she has listed Grace Abbott. Rose Bampton, Pamela Bianco. Carrie Jacobs Bond. Evangeline Bnoth. Pearl Buck. Senator Hattie Caraway, Carrie Chapman Catt. Mrs. Calvin Coolidge, Katharine Cornell. Joan Crawford, Gertrude Ederle, Zona Gale, Mary ' Garden. Lillian Gish, Helen Hayes, Katherine Hepburn, Malvina Hoffman, Fannie Hurst, Eleanor Holm Jarrett, Eva Le Ga'.lienne, Anne Morrow Lind bergh, Ruth Hanna McCormick Simms. Evalvn Walsh McLean, Edna St. Vincent Millay, Helen Wills Moody. Grace Moore, Kathleen Nor ris. Julia Peterkin, Mary Pickford, Brenda Putnam. Mary Roberts Rine hart, Norma Shearer, Cornelia Otis Skinner. Gertrude Stein. Lillian D. Wald, Mrs. Harry Payne Whitney, * the Duchess of Windsor and the mother and the wife of President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Yet there are certain remarkable omissions, inevitable, no doubt, in the circumstances. Shirley Temple may be cited for illustration. All in all, however. Miss Hellman's labors have resulted in something far more important than a guide to liter ature. She has demonstrated in hT list the romance and the variety nf American life. Her book is an index finger to the rolor and vitality of a* rich a civilization as e'er the *uri ■hone on. 4