Newspaper Page Text
THE EVENING STAR With Sunday Morning Edition THEODORE W. NOYES. Editor WASHINGTON. D. C. WEDNESDAY..April It, 1938 The Evening Star Newipaper Company Main Office: 11 th Ft. and Pennsylvania Ave. New York Office: 110 East 42nd 6t. Chicago Office: 435 North Michigan Ava. Delivered by Carrier—City and Suburban Regular Edition Evening and Sunday H5c per mo. or 15c per week The Evening Star —45c per mo. or 10c per week the Sunday Star_ . ...6c per copy Night Final Edition Night Final and Sunday Star_?0c per month Night Final Star 55c per month Collection made at the end ol each month or •ach week. Ordrrs may be sent by mall or tele phone National 6000. Rate by Mall—Payable in Advance Maryland and Virginia Oaily and Sunday...1 yr.. *10.00; 1 mo,. 86c □ally only -1 yr., SH.oo; 1 mo., 60c lundey only-1 yr.. *4.00; 1 mo., 40e All Other Slates and Canada Dally and Sunday.1 yr., *12.00; 1 mo., *1.00 Dally only-1 yr., *8.00; 1 mo., ',6c ■unday only.._l yr., *5.00; l mo. 6ue Member ol the Associated Press The Associated Press is exclusively entitled to the use lor repubhcation ol all news dispatches credited to It or not otherwise credited in this paper and also the local news published herein. All rights ol publication ol special dispatches herein also are reserved. The Auditorium. The plan just approved by a special commission for a large public audi torium at Third street and Constitution avenue N.W. gives Congress an oppor tunity to meet in a satisfactory manner, at this session, a long pending and widely recognized need of the Nation's Capital. As reported yesterday, the proposal of the Capital Auditorium Commission is that the Federal Government put up the building, estimated to cost about $9,000, 000, provided the District government contributes part of its Municipal Center as the site. If, as was indicated yesterday, the commission has in mind that part of the Municipal Center from Constitu tion avenue to C street between Third street and John Marshall place, the donating of the site would represent a local contribution toward the project in the only way the District government is financially able to contribute at the present time. Assuming that the legislation being drafted to carry out the recommendation will specify that square, the auditorium project would not interfere with plans already approved by Congress for mu nicipal structures on other portions of the Municipal Center area. In the new District Appropriation Act, for example. Congress has designated the square •xtending west on Pennsylvania avenue from John Marshall place to Sixth street as a future site for a new Public Library', and at the same time appropri ated money for a new police headquarters building in the square north of C street between Third and John Marshall place. Later, a new administration building for the District government is expected to be built north of C street and extending west from the police structure to Sixth street. The commission, very wisely, has out lined an auditorium project appropriate to meet all of the requirements of a National Capital—Federal and non Federal, commercial and non-commer cial. It should be essentially a national undertaking, and, when completed, un doubtedly will be under Federal super vision. Differences of opinion always arise as to the best location for important struc tures, and there are some who still believe the auditorium should be placed at the end of East Capitol strpet, where It would fit in with plans for a stadium and National Guard armory. On the other hand, there is much to be said for the decision of the Audi torium Commission in favor of a central location, convenient to hotels, public buildings and Union Station. In addi tion, it would be a further link in the improvement and beautification of the area between the Capitol and the White House. The paramount need, however, is to obtain action on an issue that has remained too many years in the plan ning stage. And if the long-awaited goal can be reached now by having the local community contribute the $1,774, 000 it has invested in that part of the Municipal Center not already designated for local buildings, the practical course would be for all who recognize the need for an auditorium to urfite in seeking prompt passage of the bill about to be introduced. Experience has shown that when ques tions of this kind go over from one Con gress to another, they grow cold and may languish indefinitely. Washington needs an auditorium now! Radio is doing wonders for naval communication but has not been, so far, successful in choosing a site near the Capital which will coincide with official impressions of propriety. Doctor Townsend is willing to be grateful but insists on applying certain intellectual methods of deciding pre cisely to whom his gratitude is due. That Airport Again. One of the most serious features of the prolonged delay on the part of Congress in selecting an airport site for Washington is not the fact that the Federal Government is failing lament ably in its duty but that, by its pro crastination. it is preventing any real improvement of the existing Washington Airport by private capital. Washington Airport is inadequate for existing air transport traffic. That fact is not contested by any one, even its owners and operators. But, until some thing more adequate is provided, Wash ington Airport must serve all of the Capital's airport needs. It would seem very obvious that it is tha duty of all concerned—not the least of all, Congress—to see that Washington /* t Airport is made as safe and adequate as possible. And yet, Congress, year after year, dangles over the heads of Washington Airport owners the threat that some day, possibly, the Federal Government will construct here an air port which will put the present airport out of business. In the face of this continuous threat, it is impossible for private capital to undertake the large-scale land acquisi tion ana development program necessary ' to improve the local airport, even to the possible limits. In a way, it would be a mercy if Con gress were to confess frankly: "It is impossible for the great and powerful Congress of the United States to solve so small a problem as the selec tion of an airport site for the city of Washington. For twelve years we have grappled with this great problem and are baffled. But we will no longer stand in the way of private capital, which through the years has given Washington an air port—of sorts—where Congress has failed. We can’t cope with the problem so we will step aside and no longer threaten you. We relinquish to private enterprise a task too great for the National Congress. Carry on, with our blessings." Spain Pays. No matter where one's sympathies lie in the Spanish conflict—and seldom have American sympathies in a purely extraneous situation been so sorely divided—it is plain to most observers I in this country that Spain is cast for the role of goat in the vaunted Anglo Italian • peace” pact. Implicit in the Chamberlain-Mussolini deal is the fact that Great Britain in effect underwrites Franco's victory, because Italian troops will not be withdrawn from the blood soaked peninsula until the war is over; that is, until the republic's doom is sealed by the triumph of the Insurgents and their Fascist allies. It is that un written, but only thinly veiled, provision of democracy’s shotgun alliance with dictatorship that justifies Loyalist Premier Negrin's despairing plaint that the Anglo-Italian accord is "clear inter vention in the Spanish war.” Thus, in the name of “realism,” Brit ain scraps two years of lip service on behalf of non-intervention, non-aggres sion and collective security. When France kow-tows to II Duce in a kindred agreement, as Premier Daladier, another "realist,” is about to do, European de mocracy's debacle will be complete. It will be ingloriously recorded that, in international politics as in human rela tions, It is every man for himself and the devil take the hindmost. Spain is about to go the way of Ethiopia and Austria. It seems almost a pity that none of those three ill-fated countries was inhabited by Chinese. They alone have shown that the way of the ag gressor is hard. The British and the French choose to save their own skins from ravage by Europe's allied and associated bullies, blackmailers and bluffers. They prefer salvation at'the cost of the destruction of a friendly state, whose sole crime was refusal to substitute alien ideologies for a regime of its own creation. As the nations send up Eastertide hosannas for the “peace gain” registered by the Anglo-Italian accord, let them ponder the price paid for it. Spain knows. It is she who will foot the bill. Once again Freedom, which “shrieked when Kos ciuszko fell,” screams in contemplation of dictatorship's latest achievement. The Truck Peril. When a ten-ton concrete mixer truck jumped the curb in Pennsylvania avenue at Third street yesterday and ran down J. Leroy Stem of Vigo Park, Texas, the people of Washington were afforded a i tragic dramatization of the need for more drastic control of the operation of heavy motor vehicles. The weight of such juggernauts, manifestly, makes them a particular peril in traffic. Run ning wild, they create havoc in propor tion to the power represented in them. Of course, the problem is not new. Thoughtful citizens have been conscious of it for years. What is wanted for its correction, it seems, is a speed regula tion rigid enough to kovern such machines. A ten-ton vehicle simply should not be driven at a pace as hazardous as that responsible for Mr. Stem’s death. The operator of the truck admitted that “his brakes failed him when he tried to stop suddenly behind a bus loaded with school children.” Obviously, the basic fault was haste. Moving cautiously and reasonably in the city’s most important thoroughfare, the driver would not have been obliged to attempt a sudden stop. He blames his brakes, yet they probably would not have “failed” under normal strain. The fact is that in the emergency he expected more of them than they could do. Twenty-seven fatalities in the Nation’s Capital since January 1 prompt con sideration of a revision of prevailing speed regulations downward. Especially for heavy trucks, there “ought to be a law” definite enough to stop such slaughter as that of yesterday. A generous attitude is to be observed in apportioning supplies of helium for the use of German dirigibles. It will be agreeable to assume that the gas may always be relied on for a friendly de meanor regardless of what the mental attitudes of one or two members of the crew may chance to be. New Isthmian Canal. In view of troubled world conditions and the vital necessity for maintaining speedy naval communication between the Atlantic and the Pacific, if for no other reason, the proposed Isthmian Canal through Nicaragua would seem to be a project meriting the most serious consideration. Proponents of the Nicaraguan canal point out that the locks of the Panama Canal are just large enough to accom modate the Navy's largest airplane carriers and that the size of the locks, obviously, fixes ^lmlts upon the slse of | future vessels which must use the canal. Commercial liners, such as the Nor mandie and Queen Mary, are too large for the present locks. To rebuild the Panama Canal locks. Army engineers estimate, would cost $200,000,000. There is very strong senti ment .in Congress against putting that much money into the Panama Canal without making any gain in strength against enemy attack which might close the Navy’s “life line” between the Atlantic and Pacific. Proponents of the Nicaraguan Canal say that the new canal could be con structed for $500,000,000, or about the cost of maintaining the United States fleet for one year. Army estimates, which it is said are based on older, less efficient types of excavating machinery, are higher. Aside from the fact that the Nicara guan Canal would very materially shorten the distance between American Atlantic and Pacific coastal ports and so prove of great benefit to commercial traffic, it would greatly strengthen the national defense, not only by speeding up passage of the fleet from one ocean to the other but by preventing the fleet being bottled up on either side of the isthmus. And then, too, the project obviously would provide a tremendous amount of work relief for a great variety of Ameri can industries. Proponents of the new canal have much of solid worth to offer in support of their project. Ambassador Kennedy will relieve this Nation of much expense by putting an end to presentations at court for the sake of fashionable distinction. A step further might be taken by a discourage ment on the part of this country of able lecturers, who are always made welcome, and yet whose wares are sel dom of intellectual service. We are rapidly approaching a point of candor which permits the questions, "What have you?” and “Will it be useful in meeting our human needs?” Europe is rearranging her politics and this country avoids delivering what might be considered a shock in ac commodating itself to them. There is not even a suspicion to be harbored in < considering the affection and feeling with which that old waltz, "The Blue Danube,” is played by radio. At all events it is a good tune and its political significances need not be too closely analyzed. It may be a satisfaction to the public to realize that the gold put away in Kentucky will some day come to a career of practical usefulness. It is abundant but not superabundant. There is no danger that it will assert itself in a way to govern the odds in a Kentucky horse race. It is alleged that Chinese children are being taught songs which mean glorifi cation of Japanese soldiers. Eastern Asiatic music should be interesting, but so far not enough of it has been pro duced to give it serious standing as an incident of war or strategy. As the season progresses notice is served that it will soon be too warm for a truly named "fireside chat.” How ever, it may be assumed that there will be opportunity to revive a once familiar political phrase, "Something equally as good.” Formosan farmers are to occupy them selves in cultivating an area adjacent to Shanghai. They will not insist on a reconstruction of the city in a way to make it immediately useful as a market for their products. Shooting Stars. By PHILANDER JOHNSON. The Difference. When Betty goes to lunch with Bob, She seeks some place where waiters rob, And with the chef you take a chance On cookery and high finance. She goes through oysters, soup and fish, And on, through many a dainty dish And Bob pays up with smile so sweet. He simply loves to watch her eat. But Betty, when she takes her lunch, Alone, is quite content to munch A leaf of lettuce that displays A tiny dab of mayonnaise. While Bob sits up, quite by himself, Upon a stool, next to a shelf, And ere he bites his modest bun, Nods, and the waiter yells, “Draw one!” Intrinsic Discussion. "We will have to print tons of paper money,” said Senator Sorghum. “That's all right,” said the visitor. "It’s going to be perfectly good money.” “Of course. Even if we have to keep clipping off margins of value, all that high-class paper ought to be worth something.” Sport. Willie chipped an Easter egg And then prepared to ramble. His grandma said, "Desist, I beg— You know it's wrong to gamble.” “I observe with deep and respectful interest the process of pump priming,” said Hi Ho, the sage of Chinatown. “My venerable ancestors in their centuries of history have tried this, also.” The Wash. With bills the collectors stood by in a row, And the cause of delay sadly learned: “The Government now washes money, you know, - And my laundry has not yet returned.” Cruelty. “Are you fond of golf?” "Useless question! If I were really fond of the game, would I have the heart to make it look so foolish?” "De snake in de garden of Eden didn’ have to bite any one to show how pizen he was,” said Uncle Eben. “He simply [ went right alone bein' conversational." fi Anti-Recession Proposals Offered by the President. To the Editor of The Star: In connection with the Chief Execu tive's anti-recession proposals as offered to the Congress this last week it might be said that through this message Mr. Roosevelt has returned to the inevitable factor which so popularized the New Deal that so gaily skipped the mile between Capitol and White House some what over five years ago. Abandoning any semblance of laissez-faire, it proudly shouted "The only thing to fear is fear itself.” The "sick anxiety,” as one com mentator wrote, of long months was tossed to the winds; the New Deal had arrived and it was but political seconds before the methods which are facing us at present were administered to a thrilled and excited Nation. This Easter season of 1938 finds the words, "The only thing to fear is fear itself,” spoken by every one but the author of those words; it finds the New Deal meaning little as compared to its all-meaning when originally issued; worst of all it finds the master political author of all this popularly spoken of in words unbecoming the man or his country. It now seems that such success as was achieved led inevitably from suggestion to broad demand, to defeat, and back to suggestion. For was not Thursday night's "chat” conciliatory, was it not in behalf of something that would not sell itself? But Mr. Roosevelt seems, obviously, to think that nothing worth while would sell itself. For the Presi dent of the United States to deal with particulars would be disastrous. Roose veltian philosophy would indicate. Broad objectives are befitting a great executive, but lie must remain great if they are to befit. But let there be no doubt that ap propriation for national improvement and enhancement is simply to bolster business courage. Without public im provement, Mr. Roosevelt now realizes, his administration would certainly be resting on uncertain laurels. Members of Congress, no doubt, will consequently reason that to campaign next fall with such weapons as their chief's recent popularly called "disorganization plan” would mean their individual extin guishment. But is Federal spending such a horror? It is known that a corporation that found itself in the red. generally speak ing, could absolutely not spend a hypo thetical $5,000,000 to construct an office building. The Government can. The dif ference being that financial management of Government and business, of necessity? follows on parallel and therefore never meeting lines. In preparing the budget of a business concern, property is an asset; Government property remains from budget mention. Then again, if we were to accomplish true business recovery, would certain public works be even touched? No, contentment would reign, and thousands would be left dependent on private en dowments in order to complete their education. Many would never receive them. Our land would drift from under our feet through erosion that Wall Street would never recognize as a liability. C. C. C. restoration in national forests would be diminished. Indeed, without Government finance., simple business recovery would be dark victory. Certain popular needs cannot possibly be achieved through conciliation with business. ROBERT CHARLES DUFFIE. Holds L ewis as Chief Factor In Prevention of Reeoverv. To the Editor of The Star: Roger W. Babson. the renowned statis tician. at the Congregational Church luncheon here the other day, said C. I. O. Lewis is principally the cause of this prevention of recovery during the last six months. That is not news. It is confirmation. Lewis evidently thinks the regulation of wages, hours and collective bargaining is the remedy and if he can force those onto the employer all differences and arguments will be outlawed, while the employer thinks he knows how to run his own business—and sometimes he does. There was a time when 10 hours was a day's labor and no fault was found and when the laborer got in extra time it was something to write home about. Many prospered on this. They lived well and bought homes. To be sure, wages were low as compared with today but living expense was also low and those of ability and willingness accumulated property. Does C. I. O. Lewis think, aided as he is by the administration, that he can bring employers to their knees and sub mit to his dictation when employers have the money in their pocket that labor must first work lor? Were those big factories to close their shops what would the employes do for daily bread? And by the same token when employes become dissatisfied let them quit and if some one else takes the job that does not concern the man who abandoned it. This is supposed to be a free country and a man is supposed to have the right to run his own business according to his own ideas and plans, but when the unions say a non-union man cannot work on the job that is infringing on citizen rights. There was a time when every man sought his own job and made his own arrangements as to wages and if those arrangements did not prove satisfactory to him he quit and that was the end of it. with no objection to some one else taking the job. He was independent and exercising his citizen right. Suppose a national week hours law Is passed. Better make it a maximum 60. Then let the employe arrange with the hiring boss as to the hours per day he wants to work and change it month by month should he so want. Any em ployer w'ants to run his own business and so does the employe. W. J. DERMOTT. Wage-Hour Legislation Would React on Congress To the Editor of The Star: It seems strange that those Govern ment officials who are so anxious to pass a wage and hour law, to win labor union approval, don’t realize that they will make many enemies if they do. It is very unfair to pass such a law without including all workers, and there will be many hundreds of thousands of the un derprivileged classes not in it, farm workers, those in domestic service, etc., who must work from 16 to 18 hours a day when their employers demand it at times. If this bill should pass, then we can show our disapproval of such injustice by voting against those ambitious poli ticians in Congress at election time. It is all the more amazing that this bill is actually being pushed along by a woman member of the House of Repre sentatives, for a woman knows only too well the long hours, and in many cases low wages, of those in domestic service at least. As all House members are up for election in November, we can re member this injustice and make our votes count against them then. If it is not possible to pass legislation helping us, then none should be passed at all. In the midst of such a severe depression as we are in now, everybody should be treated with equal fairness, > THIS AND THAT | BY CHARLES E. TRACEWELL. — Upton Street. I "Dear Sir: "Here's what you do to have good grass. "First, you have or plant locust trees. The grass always has a chance under locust trees because they add something to the soil—nitrogen, I think—which is more beneficial to the grass than to weeds. “Then again the locust tree does not give such dense shade as to exclude too much sun, just as its presence is bene ficial in excluding some sun in a place where you can get too much. “If the grass is in the shade half a day—that's good. “Second, the grass should be well watered by soaking it—not a quagmire— when you do water it. But then you want to forget about watering it again until the soil begins to get dry. * * * * "The grass likes its wet-dry cycle because that's nature. Only by the use of the artificial sprinkling can you pro duce a more alleviated, moderated wet dry cycle, which is salutary. "Third, and very important—but let the English groundkeeper answer: "You cuts it and you rolls it and you cuts it and you rolls it for a thousand years.’ “Cutting the heads off the budding weeds is the greatest weed deterrent known to man. If there is one thing a weed doesn’t like it is to have its head consistently cut off. “You cut the grass often and as close as experience teaches is best—not too close. "What makes the rolling so beneficial is the insuring that the knobs and hillocks do not hump up one wheel of the mower and thus let some weed heads escape. “Fourth, the soil should not be as rich as for flowers. “Yours truly, 8. G. G.’’ 28th Street. "Dear Sir: "I am particularly Interested In your articles on birds. "We have been living in our present location on the edge of Rock Creek Park for six springs and have had bluebirds every year, including this. "As a matter of fact, we usually have a couple with us all winter. During the past winter on many warm days they visited the boxes, going in and out and examining them as they do in spring before building. For example, on New Year Day we had them in our yard, fluttering around one of the boxes, in cidentally the one in which they built this year. "Last year our ‘blues’ built in an old beech tree stump, which I had provided on the edge of our deck porch. “This was a convenient location for observations, so I kept a kind of bird log of the life of a bluebird family, in the hope that it might be of interest to you and your readers. * * * * "Last year the actual buillding of the nest began on April 5. "The female (largely) constructs the nest out of soft grass, in a week and a half or two weeks. One blue egg was deposited in the nest each day, begin ning April 18, for six days. Six eggs are about the maximum; I had never seen more than five before. "On May 7 four frowsy fledglings were hatched. (One egg was found out I ' aide the box and a shell in the garden nearby. I do not know whether the two eggs did not hatch and were carried out by the old birds, or whether marauder starlings, which did sometimes attempt to enter the cavity, got them.) “On May 22 the four fledglings took to flight at intervals of about half an hour apart, flying into a nearby orchard at their first attempt. A very severe storm arose in the afternoon of that day. We were afraid that the young birds, not being very strong, were destroyed. The male reappeared in the yard with his call of lament later in the day. On May 31 two young bluebirds returned to the yard and examined the box in which they were presumably raised. "The female began carrying grass to a new box and a second family, the log of which I did not attempt to keep, was raised. "Sometimes in the early fall the old birds, with 8 or 10 young ones, stay around the yard and examine and re examine the boxes. Perhaps that is the reason we always have 'blue robins.’ If the parent couple does not take one of the boxes, possibly a pair of the off spring stay around or return. "Sincerely, E. M.” A summary prepared by Mr. M. shows two weeks for the building of the nest; one week for egg laying, two weeks’ incu bation, two weeks until ready for flight and one week’s care before starting a second nest. The male, he states, cares for the fledglings while the female is building the second nest. * * * * Wesley Heights. "Dear Sir: "When I awoke this morning 'April 13) my first Jenny wren was near my window singing to beat the band. When I left home for the office he, or she, was looking over my bird boxes for a summer home. "You will remember when I wrote you last that we could look for the wrens about April 15, so you see I didn't miss it much. "Very Sincerely, W. H. H.” * * * * Lowell Street. "Dear Sir: » "Can you tell me the name of the silvery toned bird whose two notes woke me this morning? "Also do tell me what has become of the mockingbirds. When I was in Washington in December I saw dozens of'them and expected to find them in full song now. “I have seen white crowned sparrows, juncos, cedar waxwings, a mourning dove, many cardinals and others. "Am making a list to take back to my forest and field club in Northern New England and wish to identify as many birds as possible. “Sincerely, C. R. B.” * * * * Mockingbirds have gone north, but many have remained. We have one in full song morning, noon and night. The bird with the silvery voice prob ably was a song sparrow. Wrens arrived in our community on April 14. The male arrives first. Our correspondent's ideas about grass are admirable, in the main, but any tree's roots take too much food and wrater to benefit surrounding grass, we feel. The grass close to the trunk mav be all right, but that farther out will suffer. WASHINGTON OBSERVATIONS I BY FREDERIC WILLIAM WILE. Editor & Publisher, the “newspaper ior makers of newspapers.” has been polling the publishers and editors of the coun try about the depression. Fired at them was the question: “With many essential elements for recovery present, what principal obstacle prevents it?” Fear of the Roosevelt administration is held to be the chief barrier. The most rea soned reply came from a distinguished Republican—William Allen White, editor of the Emporia Gazette. The famous Kansan says: “The obstacle to the thing we call recovery is not fear of one man. If Roosevelt, Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin all were to die within a month, the obstacle would remain. For hundreds of millions of men, round pegs in square industrial holes not functioning fully to capacity, although our presidents and dictators all were dead, would still feel that the distributive system of Christen dom is not perfect. These hundreds of millions will continue to agitate for a larger share than they now receive in the gross product of the machine age.” * * * * Continues the Sage of Emporia: “Uni versal education and the common use of machinery have fused a new dynamite of discontent in the world. In Europe the common man has turned futilely to the dictator. Soon the dictator will pass. In America the forgotten man turned to Roosevelt. Roosevelt also is temporary. His followers are here to stay. Unless the wisdom of man can find some fair way to secure exceptional rewards to exceptional men who have organizing talents and at the same time to establish a universally high standard of living which will satisfy the common man who has only a common talent, we shall have no peace in business or industry. It is a world problem facing modern man. No leader nor any small group of men is the menace. The men ace is inherent in the problem of the distribution of income. Neither side is right.” i * * * * One of Ambassador Joe Kennedy's first tasks in London is right up his street—the adjustment of the ticklish controversy over admission of American movie films to the British market. Al though he was already well to do, the foundations of Kennedy’s present for tunes were laid some 11 or 12 years ago as a result of his skill and activities in reorganizing important units in the moving picture industry. He is a former president and chairman of the board of the Film Booking Offices of America, of the Keith-Albee-Orpheum Theatres Corp., and of Pathe Exchange. It was largely with movie-made dollars that the “Boston Irishman” became the original “For-Roosevelt-Before-Chicago” cam paign angel in 1931-2. Both the State Department and the motion picture people are greatly pleased with the man ner in which Mr. Kennedy is handling the film fracas with our British cousins, * * * * Many of his old official and personal cronies in Washington are in receipt of gold-lettered invitations to the fiftieth wedding anniversary of Ambassador Josephus Daniels and Mrs. Daniels, which will be celebrated at Raleigh on May 2. The World War Secretary of the Navy is coming home from Mexico City for the party, which his four sons are staging in their parents’ honor. No one in the Capital cherishes Mr. Daniels in more affectionate memory than Presl i dent Roosevelt, who, wartime he sees his war-time boss, invariably addresses him as "chief." The editor-diplomat will be 76 years old next month. He some times claims to have been the original patentee of the "Franklin Roosevelt-for President" movement. * * * * Marguerita Sylva. prima donna of the Strauss "Three Waltzes" musical ro mance now playing in Washington, who, in her Metropolitan Opera days was ac claimed in America and abroad as one of the great Carmens of all times, recalls with pride her part in the at tempted creation of the "Washington National Opera" in 1920. A prime mover in that enterprise was Mrs. Robert Bacon, wife of a former Secretary of State. To help the cause, Madame Sylva gave three performances of "Carmen" gratis and brought along as her Don Jose a famous Czechoslovakian tenor, with whom she had sung in grand opera at Berlin and Prague, Otto Marak. A native of Belgium, Madame Sylva in private life is the wife of Maj. B. L. Smith. United States Marine Corps, of Richmond, Va. * * * * No one of the many addresses sched uled for the forthcoming annual meeting of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States will deal with a more vital subject than the one assigned to Rear Admiral Emory S. Land, chairman of the United States Maritime Commis sion. On May, 3 he will discuss "Pres ent Plans for Rehabilitating Americas Merchant Marine." Like his prede cessor, Joe Kennedy, “Jerry" Land holds strong views on the urgency of combat ing unbridled unionism in the shipping industry. The major evils are the bitter jurisdictional quarrels between C. I. O. and the A. F. of L. and the Communistic Influence at work in the Lewis maritime union. Until ways and means are dis covered for making Uncle Sam the boss of his own ships, Land sees little use for the Nation to embark upon an expansive and expensive merchant marine pro gram. Labor, the chairman is persuaded, holds the key. * * * * Non-aggression treaties recently con cluded between Brazil and Bolivia are the latest examples of inter-American good neighbor policy and peace machin ery. They contrast currently with the reign of force and disregard of law prevalent in Europe and Asia. Instead of one big neighbor swallowing a small one. as in the case of Germany and Austria, Brazil, the largest American republic, declares it regards as definitive and not subject to modifications the territorial status of Bolivia, which is surrounded by neighbors militarily more powerful than herself. As to that part of Bolivian territory still to be defined, the blood-soaked Gran Chaco, which is now under discussion with Paraguay, Brazil will recognize and respect only that which is accorded peacefully by juridical means and in keeping with the United States’ doctrine of non recognition of territorial gains by force. Rio de Janiero is thus insuring a dip lomatic and legal settlement of the most difficult South American controversy. Brazil's own peace policy, a Latin Amer ican commentator has just pointed out, is manifested by non-fortification of her 8,000 miles of frontier, which is as devoid of guns and forts as the Cana dian-American boundary, although the Amazon colossus abuts every country in South America except one. * * * * It was unquestionably the quality of mercy which impelled F. D. R. to pardon Dr. Townsend. But the inventor of the revolving pension plan still marshals a host of hun^eds of thousands of sup ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS By FREDERIC J. HASKIN. A reader can get the answer to any Question of fact by writing The Evening Star Information Bureau, Frederic J. Haskin, Director, Washington, D. C. Please inclose a stamp for reply. Q. Where was the first C. C. C. camp?—J. H. A. The first Civilian Conservation Camp was located at Luray, Va., in mid April, 1933. Q. How tall are Postmaster General Farley and Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau?—E. L. H. A.. Mr. Morgenthau is 6 feet, 4 inches and Mr. Farley is 6 feet, 2'i Inches. Q. How many flve-and-ten-cent stores are there?—H. J. A. There are 5,658 flve-and-ten-cent stores in the United States. Q. Why is a planked steak so called?— M. H. A. A planked steak is cooked on a specially made "plank” about the size of a platter which contains grooves to catch the gravy. The charred wood is supposed to give the steak an espe cially fine flavor. Q. Who wrote the words of the song beginning, "East Side, West Side, all around the town”?—R. K. L. A. James W. Blake wrote “The Side walks of New York” in 1894. Q. Is it true that most children know very little about arithmetic?—W. H. J. A. In a recent address Dr. Guy M. Wilson, professor of education at Boston University and an authority on simpli fied methods of teaching arithmetic, said: "Less than 20 per cent of pupils in grades seven and eight in the United States make perfect scores on very simple addition, subtraction or multiplication.” Dr. Wilson believes that failure is due in part to poor teaching and the mass of useless or little used facts which the ' average person never uses. Q. What is the origin of the expres sion, “When you call me that, smile"?— H. K. A, It is from “The Virginian," by Owen Wister. Q. In the movie “Marco Polo" were the scenes showing the Great Wall of China authentic?—K. V. A, They were reproductions built at Chatsworth, Calif., near Hollywood. Q. How many veterinarians are there? —E. G. A. There are approximately 13.000 licensed veterinarians in the United States. Q. Has the force of the teeth ever been estimated?—L. W. R. A. Molars come together with a force of from 100 to 160 pounds with a maxi mum of 270. In cracking bones, a dog uses 363 pounds. Q. Was bread once baked in the United States Capitol at Washington for the soldiers?—A. E. H. A. During .the Civil War soldiers were quartered in the Capitol and bread was baked in the basement. Q. Did men shave in Bible times?— C. F. H. A. There are many references to shaving in the Bible. In Genesis, 41:14, we find that Joseph shaved himself before going into the presence of Pharaoh. Q What was the name of Alexander the Great's favorite horse?—E. H. W. A. Bucephalus was the horse in whose honor Alexander named a city Bucephala. Q. Why did the Army use two kinds of tests called the Alpha and Beta?— A. R. A. The two Army tests, the Alpha and Beta, are both intelligence tests. The Alpha test was devised for those men who could read English. The Beta test was given to illiterates and foreigners who could not read English. Q. What is a stock r-Hiit?—L. G. A. A stock right is an offer made by a company to its shareholders. It per mits them on or before a specified date to subscribe for additional shares at a price under the market. Q. How many listeners responded to Father Coughlin's address when he asked them to protest against the passage of the reorganization bill?—R. M. A. It is estimated that more than 80,000 persons responded. Q. How many States can be seen from Lookout Mountain?—C. H. W. A. From the top of Lookout Mountain near Chattanooga seven States are vis ible: Tennessee. Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia and Kentucky. Q. What newspaper won the Ayer Cup?—E. W. A. The Francis Wayland Ayer Cup was awarded to the Newark <N. J.) Evening News. It is given annually to the daily newspaper chosen as the most outstanding for typographical excellence. Q. When will the United States Cham ber of Commerce Convention be held?— W. H. J. A. The Chamber of Commerce of the United States will meet at Washington, D. C„ May 2-5. Q. Is Marietta, Ohio, holding more than one celebration this year in honor of its sesquicentennial?—J. H. G. A. One was held beginning on April 7, when a group of young men re-enacted the 1788 trek from New England, which opened the Ohio country for settlement. Throughout the week an elaborate pro gram of pageants, parades and display of historic buildings was held. A second celebration will be held beginning July 8, in commemoration of the establish ment of civil government in the Terri tory in July, 1788. Q. Who was the Greek athlete who carried an ox on his shoulders?—L. M. B. A. Milo or Milon of Crotona, a Greek athlete who lived about the end of the 6th century B.C., carried an ox on his shoulders through the stadium in Olym pia. He was six times crowned at the Olympic Games and six times at the Pythian for wrestling. His name was a synonym for strength throughout the civilized world and he commanded the army which defeated the people of Sy baris in 511. Q. What has become of Billy Sunday, Jr.?—H. K. L. A. William Ashley Sunday. Jr., son of the late evangelist, died recently in Los Angeles, Calif, at the age of 37. porters, especially in the Far West and Coast country. It’s dollars to doughnuts that the President's clemency to their hero has harnessed their sympathies to the New Deal chariot, which isn't sneezing at sympathy these days. Sji (Copyright, 1938.) ^