Newspaper Page Text
Veiling ptaf With Sunday Mornlni Edition. THEODORE W. NOTES, Editor. WASHINGTON, D. C. TUESDAY_December 5, 1939 The Evening Star Newspaper Company. Main Office: 11th St. and Pennsylvania Ave. New York Office: 110 East 42nd St. Chicago Office: 435 North Michigan Ave. Delivered by Carrier—City and Suburban. Beralar Edition. Evening and Sunday 65c per mo. or 15e per week The Evening Star 45c per mo. or 10c per week The Sunday Star _ -, 6c per copy Night Final Edition. Night Final and Sunday Star_75c per month Night Final Star ... _60c Per month Collection made at the end of each month or each week Orders may be sent by mall or tele phone National 5000. Rate by Mail—Payable in Advance. Maryland and Virginia. Dally and Sunday, 1 yr $10.00; 1 mo.. 85c Daily only _1 yr., $6.00; 1 mo., 50c Sunday only _1 yr.. $4.00: 1 mo., 40« All Other States and Canada. Dally and Sunday, 1 yr., $12.00: 1 mo„ $1.00 Daily only __1 yr., $8.00; 1 mo.. 75c Sunday only_1 yr.. $5.00; 1 mo.. 60c Entered as second-class matter post office. Washington. D. C. Member of the Associated Press. The Associated Press is exclusively entitled to the use for republication of all news dispatches credited to it or not otherwise credited in this paper and also the local news published herein AH rights of publication of special dispatches herein also are reserved. Why the Camouflage? Senator Norris of Nebraska has issued a plea to President Roosevelt not to tell the politicians in the Democratic and Republican parties whether he will be a candidate for a third term. It may not be material in Mr. Norris’ opinion, but as long as the President fails to let the poli ticians know what his purpose is, Just so long are the American people also kept in the dark. Underlying Mr. Norris’ plea for silence on the part of Mr. Roosevelt lies the desire of the Nebraska Sena tor that the President shall run again. He cloaks it with assertions that “no man can tell what may happen in the next several months,” apparently referring to the war sit uation in Europe and the possibility of the United States being drawn into the conflict. He suggests that if Mr. Roosevelt should remove him self from the picture as a potential candidate, the liberals, the New Deal ers and even the Democratic party might be split even further into con flicting groups—and that in the end it would be impossible for a real New Dealer to be nominated by the Dem ocratic party, of which, incidentally, Mr. Norris has never been a member. Senator Norris reveals in his state ment, however, that he regards President Roosevelt as the only man in the country who can carry on the New Deal. He says the President “must remember” that he cannot surrender his leadership, while the battle is still on, against the wishes of millions of progressives who “look upon him as the only man who can lead them to victory.” That is the real milk in the Norris coconut. It is not! surprising that Senator Norris should favor a third term for President Roosevelt—any more than that Secretary Ickes, Secretary Wal lace and Senator Guffey of Pennsyl vania should do so. He has expressed similar sentiments at various times in the past. In 1932 and in 1936, Senator Norris supported the Presi dent and the President reciprocated when Senator Norris was up for re election in 1936 and running, not as the Democratic nominee for the Sen ate, but as an "independent.” Presi dent Roosevelt took up Senator Nor ris’ long fight against the public utilities, and set up the T. V. A. with Congress’ aid. Mr. Norris assumes that it is only President Roosevelt’s enemies who now desire to know whether he is to run again, at least, that it is only the President’s enemies who wish him to make an open statement. It would almost seem that Mr. Norris does not believe in the strength of the New Deal—as such. It is the personal leadership of the President which is needed to keep it alive and to prevent a return of more conserv ative government. For Senator Nor ris warns that, unless Mr. Roosevelt leads, the united opposition might in convention—supposedly the Demo cratic National Convention—succeed in “nominating a reactionary, or, at least a candidate who was progres sive only ‘in spots.’ ” It is possible to read into Mr. Nor ris’ statement a belief that this has become a one-man country—that no one except Mr. Roosevelt at this time is capable of leading it. If that were admitted today, it might easily be admitted at the close of another four years of Mr. Roosevelt in the White House. What then becomes of tfie democratic principle? A Red Goes to College Yale’s student body, turning out with undergraduate enthusiasm for Earl Browder’s speaking engagement, should serve as a guide to future policy for other institutions and organizations facing the question of reconciling the dictates of good taste, citizenship and pedagogic re sponsibility with the rights of free speech. Barred from platforms at Harvard, Princeton and Dartmouth, the American Communist leader scored a moral victory in obtaining the floor at New Haven. But the fruits of that victory must be classed as doubtful. Shouts and firecrackers, cries of “Viva Browder” and “Down with everything” hardly could be Interpreted by the most vivid prop agandist as a collegiate swing to the left. And Moscow’s reply within forty-eight hours to Mr. Browder’s plea that America “might profitably co-operate with the powerful Soviet Union in international affairs” was a more eloquent one than even a student editor could devise. Popular misconceptions have grown up concerning the outlook of the American undergraduate during the passing decade. It is true he no longer affects pegtop trousers and bulldog pipes. But fraternities still conduct initiations. Today’s student may absorb a more complete under standing of modern social and eco nomic trends through the advance in the related sciences in recent years. His reaction may be notice able for the enthusiasm which his youth dictates. But his balance re mains the same. Like his predeces sors, he is basically a skeptic who refuses to accept either production line jackets or slogans. With the current de-emphasis of football, and particularly the "Ivy League’s’’ ban on intersectional games, events like Mr. Browder’s visit to Yale offer an excellent mid term outlet for a pent-up enthus iasm for shouting and laughter. What Price Efficiency? District officials are reported to have reached the conclusion that pending reorganization plans would increase, rather than reduce, mu nicipal expenditures, leaving the prospect of greater efficiency as the only tangible benefit to be expected from the regrouping. If there is even debatable ground for this belief it becomes imperative that the Commissioners and Con gress weigh carefully the financial effect of each detail of any reorgani zation plan before it is adopted. Improved efficiency, of course, is to be desired and would be suffi cient reason for reshuffling munici pal agencies even if it did not cut ex isting appropriations substantially. But if it is to cost more, District tax payers are entitled to have the po tential benefits placed on one side of the scales and the estimated cost on the other, so that they may de termine whether they believe this or that specific reorganization plan is worth the price. Bank Loans The charge that the Nation’s banks have not been meeting the demands for loans, and thus have been holding up business recovery, is contradicted by a report from the American Bank ers Association which shows that the banks are extending loans in great numbers and in large amounts. The survey covers the first half of the present year. In its report the A. B. A. estimates that District of Columbia banks granted 36,000 new loans amounting to $37,000,000 in the six-month pe riod, allowed 44,000 renewals totaling $41,000,000 and in addition made 900 new mortgage loans in the sum of $4,000,000. Maryland banks put out 50,000 new loans involving $60,000,000, and Virginia institutions acted favor ably on 250,000 new loans aggregat ing $240,000,000. New loans in the throe arpa.c nnmhered 336.000 and totaled $337,000,000. The survey also showed that com mercial banks in New York State made more than 1,000,000 new loans totaling in excess of $4,500,000,000 to business firms and individuals dur ing the half year, and renewed more ! than 1,000,000 loans in the same pe riod. Banks in other States an nounced new loans extended in about the same proportion. Furthermore, the banks report large “open lines of credit” available to regular business borrowers at all times, only about a third of these facilities being used. Seven Wash ington banks maintained $17,189,000 of this kind of credit during the six months, reporting that only $5,813,147 was used, or thirty-three per cent. Maryland banks reported only twen ty-seven per cent of their “open credit” as active, and Virginia banks thirty-three per cent. Equally im pressive are the open-loan figures from other States. No doubt this array of figures will be trotted out when the Mead bill, authorizing a broadening of the scope of Federal Reserve loans, again comes up for hearings in Congress. It must be kept in mind that there are hosts of other institutions in addition to banks which are con stantly making loans. But the A. B. A. banking study makes it very diffi cult to see where any new lending agencies are really needed to meet the requirements of big or little busi nss, either in the territory surround ing Washington or elsewhere. Prince Georges Housing It Is only natural that the creation of a Rural Housing Authority in Montgomery County, Maryland, should awaken interest in the possi bilities of setting up a similar agency in Prince Georges. Evidence of the latter county’s interest has been manifest through an invitation to the chairman of the Montgomery authority to discuss his plans before the Prince Georges County Commu nity Council. A small group of the county’s leading citizens also has been studying the problem thor oughly and conducting an informal survey of the county’s need for a rural housing project. The unofficial view has been ex pressed by some citizens that Prince Georges has even more need for better housing than Montgomery. The counties are similar enough to expect like conditions to exist in such basic factors as housing. Likewise the arguments in favor of rural housing in Montgomery will apply with equal force in Prince Georges. It will afford better living and sanitary conditions for the fami lies of low-income groups. It prob £ ably will lead to better health and less crime. It will tend to gather the families affected In small communities, thus facilitating the transportation of children to school and promote community enterprises. The arguments against the Mont gomery project also can be advanced In Prince Georges. It is claimed the new rural homes will increase rather than diminish the .farm-labor prob lem, that they may Increase taxa tion and not permanently better the lives of the families Involved. The tenants, It Is claimed, will be living in small communities Instead of on the farms where they work, and will be inclined to group together to obtain employment in the city rather than remain on the farms. Any survey which Prince Georges makes before deciding to emulate Montgomery In regard to rural hous ing should therefore Include not only a study of farm housing needs but also a canvass of public sentiment. For In the last analysis such proj ects may Include subsidization and the taxpayers are the ones that have to foot the bill. The Milk Decision The unanimous decision by which the Supreme Court held that milk handlers in the Chicago marketing area are amenable to prosecution under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act is looked upon by the Department of Justice as a powerful weapon in the fight on illegal restraints in the agricultural industry, and unques tionably it is. Brushing aside the plea for im munity from criminal proceedings advanced by producers, distributors and others of the half-hundred de fendants on the ground that power to regulate the marketing of milk and other agricultural commodities had passed to the Secretary of Agri culture by virtue of farm legislation, the court, emphasizing that this regulatory program must follow a specific pattern, in one brief sentence set forth the principle underlying its decision: “Farmers and others are not per mitted to resort to their own devices and to make any agreements and arrangements they desire, regardless of the restraints which may be in flicted upon commerce.” The indictment voided by the lower court charged the defendants with conspiracy to fix the prices paid to producers and consumers, and to control the distribution and supply of milk in Chicago. The District Court ruled that the Secretary of Agriculture was empowered to pre vent or regulate these acts, but ob viously, as the Supreme Court said, in the absence of the controls pro vided by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act, the commerce in ag ricultural commodities is not stripped of the safeguards of the Anti-Trust Act, and “left open to the restraints, however unreasonable, w^iich con spiring producers, distributors and their allies may see fit to impose.” The immediate effect of the Su preme Court decision is to reinstate the case in the lower court, and un doubtedly, many months will elapse before the success or failure of the prosecution is determined. This does not, however, serve to detract from its importance to the Government, which now is given certain unques tionable rights in combatting mo nopoly, and will be able to shape its course accordingly. The case failed to throw any light on the question of whether labor is exempt from anti-trust law prose cution, as this point was not raised in the appeal, although union members are among the defendants. How ever, the court made it plain that no organization may set up as a de fense for plainly illegal acts the plea that it was striving for a legitimate objective. Counterattack Minnesota has long been known as the adopted home of powerful Scan dinavian Vikings—blond giants whose ancestors made history with the mighty Paul Bunyan. When Paul and the big blue ox, Babe, mys teriously vanished after the forests were logged off, they and their de scendants transferred their strength to *he field of farming, where they got plenty of exercise trying to lift mortgages. It is from such a stock, if names mean anything, that Carl Lucken, superman, who tames wild aUVUlliUWUVU vw—w While cranking his automobile, Carl inadvertently left it in gear. The car, springing into activity with a snort, and perhaps suffering from auto-intoxication, charged its owner viciously, thinking it was a good time to escape. The poor thing never had a chance. Carl, recover ing from his surprise, and scorning interference, tackled it part way up the radiator and stopped it in its tracks, after a gain of less than two yards from the line of scrimmage. Carefully removing his head and shoulders from a gaping hole in the radiator, Carl tenderly conveyed the victim of his violence to a garage and summoned specialists to work on the case. A tentative diagnosis showed that it was suffering from a compound fracture of the cooling system, complicated by a severe' nervous shock in every organ from bumper to differential. It has a trained mechanic in attendance day and night, and is expected to recover eventually. Mr. Lucken expresses regret over the Incident, especially over his reparations bill for twelve dollars, and says he is willing to leave it to the League Of Nations to determine the aggressor. i Of Stars, Men And Atoms Notebook of Science Progress In Field, Laboratory And Study By Thomas R. Henry. Experiments with a human 'volunteer to determine the relative "burning effi ciency” of the sugar and starches in various types of foods, in which hitherto unexpected differences were detected by delicate metabolism measurements, are reported by the Carnegie Institution of Washington. The results will form part of the an nual exhibit of scientific accomplish ments during the year, which will follow the annual meeting of the trustees De cember 15. Sugar and starches are the “coal” of life. They are seldom eaten in pure form, however, and the body Itself must extract them from the chemical complex of the various foods eaten Weights required to get the same amount of life’s Are from different com mon foods, the experiments show, differed greatly. The man had to eat only about five ounces of boiled sweet potato, for example, to get an ounce of burnable sugars and starches, whereas he had to eat 21 ounces of boiled carrots and 24 ounces of boiled beets. The required weights of raw white potato and raw carrot were somewhat less than those of the same vegetables when cooked. This may have been because soluble sugars and starches leached from the vegetables while they were cooking, or because the vegetables themselves took up water while they were boiling. On the other hand, the required weights of dried datel and figs were but little more than those of cane sugar and dextrose. Hitherto, it is pointed out In the Carnegie report, most knowledge of the processes of combustion within the body has come from studies made with pure sugars, while little has actually been known regarding the burning of the more complex hydrocarbons. The amount of carbohydrates burned In.the body before the man ate any food— that is, about 16 hours after his supper —averaged four-hundredths of an ounce every 15 minutes. In the successive 15 minute periods after eating the increases in carbohydrate combustion above this baseline came most quickly and were greatest with cane sugar and dates. After eating such foods as white potato, rice and macaroni, the increases per 15 min utes were not so great and did not occur so soon, but persisted for a long time. With nuts the increases were small but continuous. The initial increase in carbohydrate combustion was greater after raw carrots than after boiled carrots, but in both instances it was at about the same level in the last hour of the three-hour period. With boiled white potatoes, the increase was at a higher level than with raw white potatoes throughout the entire fimo In the experiments with parsnips there was a delay in the digestion. The maxi mum increase in carbohydrate combus tion did not occur until the third hour after eating, although there was a marked increase during the first hour. The rise in the first hour, the Carnegie experts believe, probably can be ascribed to the easily soluble materials in the parsnips, and the further rise in the third hour to the subsequent absorption of digestible carbohydrates. The total amounts of carbohydrates burned during the first three hours were greatest in the case of sweet vegetables —beets, carrots and parsnips. They were smallest with rice, macaroni, raw white potatoes and nuts. For dates, cane sugar and dextrose the total amounts were only about two-thirds those ob served for beets and carrots. With raw carrots the total amount was slightly greater than with boiled carrots, but with raw white potatoes the amount was only about two-thirds that with boiled potatoes. It is generally be lieved that the cooking of vegetables in creases their digestibility. The differ ence between the two raw foods, the Carnegie experimenters believe, is prob ably ascribable to the difference in the nature of the carbohydrate content, car rots having more soluble carbohydrates than starch and white potatoes being composed predominantly of starch. With nuts the total carbohydrate com bustion was greatest with cashew nuts, probably because this nut contains a somewhat larger proportion of sugars and a smaller proportion of fat than do the others. In general when the food carbohydrates ar»> soluble sugars they are most quickly available to the body, but the increased carbohydrate com bustion lasts a short time. When the food carbohydrates are chiefly starch, they are more slowly available, but the increased combustion lasts a longer time. When the food consists predom inantly of fat, as with nuts, the fat seems to hinder the absorption and burning of carbohydrates in the food. Commends Inquiry Into Collection Agencies, ro the Editor of The Star: It is refreshing to note, through the columns of your paper, that a commit tee has been appointed by the Bar Association to investigate the methods employed by the various collection agencies in their endeavor to collect out standing debts for their clients. This bit of news should be particu larly pleasing to Government workers who are dally being harassed to death by these people. I will venture to -state that not one person in a hundred actually Intends to dodge paying just debts. But many, due to unforeseen circumstances, such as Illness, death in the family, losses in an investment, etc., are compelled to fall behind in the pay ment of their obligations. Then follows the grief. Dunning let ters containing threats to report the indebtedness to the unfortunate per son’s department head; ofttimes im mediately followed by a letter to that particular department head in an at tempt to make the Government a col lection agency. A prominent Congressman is, at the present time, seriously considering in troducing a bill at the next session which will serve notice on depart ment heads to disregard all such com munications from collection agencies. They are being paid nice salaries by the taxpayers to assist in running the Government and not to assist collec tion agencies. ALFRED J. HERRING. November 28. i THIS AND THAT By Charles t. TraceweU. / Specialization In phonograph record collection is one of lta most Interesting features. It is almost as limitless as music, itself, but not quite—that is what makes it interesting. It is possible to gather together, for Instance, all the recordings of such a composer as England’s Vaughan Wil liams, without breaking one’s purse. William Walton, a much younger Brit ish musician, has not had much of his work recorded, despite his growing fame. He is a young man, whereas Williams is getting old, but neither man’s works have been put on the discs to the extent they deserve. Both, however, have written extreme “modem” symphonies. These may be had on the records, and are guaranteed to make any hearer wince at first. Repeated hearings, the phonograph’s great boon, makes an honest listener change his first appraisal to one, if not of genuine liking, of real interest. The strange works really "have some thing,” after all, he decides. Vaughan Williams has other sym phonies, one of which, the "London,” has been recorded, and played here by our symphony orchestra. His “Pastoral” symphony awaits recording. These two works are in the classical vein set by Beethoven. * * * * It is pleasant lor me recora collector to feel that he has, in his own cases, positively all the records of a man which have been issued by all the companies. It is a feeling which cannot be had very often, any more, as the revived in terest in the records induces the com panies to issue more and more records all the time. Today the scope of the recorded library is so vast that only a millionaire could hope to have them all. This is all the more remarkable, when it is remembered that the modern elec trical recordings did not begin until about 1924. The great catalogues of the past were Junked and the work began over again, with this vital change, that whole works were recoided, and placed in albums, ' like books, instead of just snippets, prin cipally from operas, as in the past. , Today the library or recorded music is a credit both to music and to the artistic senses of the nations, as well as to scientific and merchandising genius. # * * * While there will be few musicians, all of whose records can be had by the in dividual collector, there are many smaller collections which may be at tempted, A young man may specialize on sym phonic works. In a few years he will have a very fine collection of the master works, if he sticks to it, and is not lured aside by the charm of other types of music. Or he might collect string quartets. or piano recordings. Recording has shown no greater advance, perhaps, thanks to the microphone, than that of the piano. This king of instruments Is really put on discs now so that It sounds as it should. The collection of all, or nearly all, of these piano recordings should not be beyond either the powers of endurance or purse of the real lover of keyboard music. * * * a . One might specialize on the music of one great man such as Beethoven or Mozart, or go in for the works of the great Russians. The great Russians have a way of claiming their own lovers, and modem recording gives the hearer their values to a fine degree. The rabid Beethoven “fan” would find he would not have an easy time collect ing all the recordings of the master. In deed, his purse probably would run out long before his interest. The same might be said of the collec tor who set as his goal the ownership of all the recordings of Moeart or Bach, to name but two. * * * * t We would not wish any reader to think that this type of collection must be confined solely to classical music. Those who cherish this belief miss one of the finest features, we believe, of the modem electrical gramophone. A really nice collection may be made of polkas, which, in recent months, have come to the fore again. All, positively all, the recordings of Hawaiian music might be collected by any ardent devotee, without giving up his meals to do it. Hot jazz, as it is called, is now a cult all to Itself, with its friends writing great books upon the subject. This is genuine music, no matter what some say to the contrary; it expresses the spirit of youth, the world around, often with youth’s intolerance. Record lovers might do far worse than gather in all the examples of that busy, rustling dance, the rhumba, or rumba. Spanish gypsy, or flamenco, numbers make an interesting research. Here Is a field utterly unknown to many per sons who think they "know it all” about music. This column knows a record enthusiast who, right alongside his Beethoven shelf, has a collection of all the records he can find of Hoagy Carmichael's "Star Dust,” or "Stardust,” as It is variously written. This classic of popular music may be had in some two dozen recordings, and the end is not yet. The owner, playing these records one after the other, has a form of musical comparison and enjoyment unknown to those mistaken wights who seem to be lieve that music is a very narrow affair, of which they are somehow the cus todian. Letters to the Editor w Financial Link in National Chain Declared Weak. •*0 the Editor of The Starr It is generally admitted that a chain is no stronger than its weakest link. Who can deny that the one most liable to snap in the national chain is the financial link which has been so woe fully weakened in the past decade by political theorists who have tenaciously clung to the abnormal idea that our Nation can borrow its way out of bankruptcy? The war has temporarily diverted the minds of the people from the bloated national debt but not so with American industry which stands aghast at our ever-mounting deficit, which in turn creates a demand for still higher taxes. Naturally, the greater the taxes the fewer the dividends for millions of shareholders; the purchasing power of multitudes is crippled and, in many Instances, paralyzed when the great bulk of industry’s profits are confiscated by a wasteful administration. We are being told by New Dealers that an economy program will be adopted "next year.” (It is always next year!) Who remembers the slogan, “Actions speak louder than words”? EDMUND K. GOLDSBOROUGH. November 28. vaiveri sutirments av Hearing Challenged. To the Ifitnr nt The St or: The statements of Alfred D. Calvert at the hearings on the Commissioners’ plan to reorganize the District govern ment emphasize the paucity of argu ments advanced by the opponents of local suffrage. Mr. Calvert’s statement that Com munists are responsible for an “organized stampede” to induce the Commissioners to recommend local self-government would not be worthy of comment were it not for the fact that it reflects the whispering campaign conducted by oth ers who, because of ignorance, prejudice or special interest, seek to discredit the advocates of the establishment of an American form of local government in the Capital City of the United States. If Communists are the power behind the local suffrage movement then 90 per cent of the civic leaders are “fellow travelers.” All the officers of the Fed eration of Citizens’ Associations and at least 8 of the other 10 members of the Executive Board of that organization are ardent champions of suffrage. That they correctly express the views of their constituents is evident from the fact that in the unofficial referendum of April 30, 1938, 90 per cent of the voters expressed themselves in fayor of popu lar election of the officials of the local government. Mr. Calvert’s reference to the District of Columbia as a “Federal reservation” is laughable. There are Army reserva tions and Indian reservations. The in habitants of the first named are all Government employes who retain their voting rights, while those Of the sec-* ond, though they have no vote, do have a measure of autonomy and pay no taxes. Perhaps Mr. Calvert had in mind prison reservations or insane hospitals. The denizens of such places furnish the closest analogy to the residents of the District of Columbia. Whom does Mr. Calvert represent? He is president of the Lincoln Park Citizens’ Association and a delegate from that body to the Federation of Citizens’ Asso ciations. The Lincoln Park association h Letters to the Editor must bear the name .and address of the writer, although the use of a pseudonym for publication is permissible. Please be brief! has somewhat indefinite boundaries, but it is certainly included within the area bounded by First street N.E., H street, Benning road, the Anacostia River, Pennsylvania avenue S.E. and Second street S.E. There were five voting pre cincts in that area in last year's refer endum. The total vote cast in those precincts was 9,977. of which 8.284. or 83 per cent, were in favor of local suf frage. That should be sufficient answer to Mr. Calvert's contention that his personal views are representative of the community he serves. KENNETH P. ARMSTRONG, Treasurer, Federation of December 3. Citizens’ Associations. Corrects Haskin on Mystery Of Cinderella's Slipper. To the Editor of The Star: In Mr. Haskin s column in The Star of November 28 it was claimed that Cinderella’s slipper was (as the inquirer had suggested) originally of fur, the English translator of Perrault's tales having merely mistaken “vair” (fur) for “verre” (glass). This explanation, though often re peated, seems to raise more questions than it answers. While “vair” (a par ticular type of fur rather than fur in general, which is “fourrure”) and "verre” (glass) are pronounced alike, they are not spelled alike, and should not, there fore, have confused a translator. It is even less clear why an English trans lator's error should have had any re percussion in France. Yet Larousse’s dictionary (an authority in that coun try) refers to the famous slipper as being either of “vair” or “verre,” though without indicating any reason for the uncertainty. Furthermore, in a French edition of Perrault’s tales that I once read, the story is actually entitled “Cen drillon et la Pantoufle de Verre” (Cin derella and the Glass Slipper). There fore, if this famous pedal adornment was originally of fur, the French themselves must have vitrified it. It is an accepted principle of textual criticism that in the case of variant readings the least plausible is usually the true one. For, had the original reading appeared entirely logical, there would have been no temptation to change it. As Perrault wrote the story Cinderella* slipper must, therefore, have been of glass. For while some chivalrous editor might easily have been tempted to substitute a fur slipper for a glass one, no editor, even in that day, could have been so cruel as to remove Cinderella's dainty foot from a comfortable fur slip per and then thrust it into something as barbarous as a glass slipper would seem to be. But the mystery of Cinderella’s slipper is really quite easily explained. Accord ing to a French authority, it was of cloth woven from Venetian spun glass, a material highly esteemed during the reign of Louis XIV, when this most charming of fairy tales was written. This theory, however, could be very disconcerting to those who have been trying to convince us that the art of spinning and weaving glass is one they have just developed. CHARLES H. PROBERT. December L A Answers To Questions By Frederic J. Raskin. A reader can get the answer to any question of fact by writing The Eve ning Star Information Bureau, Fred eric J. Raskin, director, Washington, D. C. Please inclose stamp for reply. Q. Is It true that propagandists have to be registered by the Government?— B. G. A. In June, 1938, Congress passed an act requiring the registration of persons "employed by agencies to disseminate propaganda in the United States.” Q. Has Washington, D. C., a larger area than Baltimore, Md?—J. ^N. D. A. The area of Washington is 62 square miles and that of Baltimore Is 78.72 square miles. Q. Where is the little church in Iowa that seats only six or eight people?— C. A. B. A. St. Anthony’s Chapel, 8 miles from Festina, accommodates only eight worshipers. Q. How many pieces of wood are there in a violin?—E. K. H. A. Approximately 70 pieces of wood are required in the making of a violin. Q. What aviator has attained the highest altitude record?—M. M. A. The world's altitude record for air- * planes was established by Col. Mario Fezzl of Italy on October 22, 1938, at which time he attained an altitude of 56,046 feet. Q. When was the first Florence Crit tenton Home for Girls opened?—L. G. R. A. On April 19, 1^83, the first Flor ence Crittenton Mission was opened at No. 29 Bleecker street, New York City, Q. How old Is the song “O Little Town of Bethlehem”?—J. B. D. A. The famous soijg was first printed in a Sunday school program of the Holy Trinity Church at Philadelphia In 1868. Q. Is Anthony Abbot the real name of the writer of mystery stories?—J. M. G. A. Anthony Abbot is the nom de plume of Fulton Oursler. Q. When did New York Inaugurate compulsory birth registration?—C. W. W. A. In New York State the first com pulsory birth registration lav; was passed in 1847, and the State was admitted to the United States birth registration area in 1915. Q. What is the origin of the simile, ‘‘White as driven snow"?—R. C. B. A. It is found in the song of Autolycus, the peddler in Shakespeare's “Winter'* Tale.” Q. How much bad money was taken in at the New York World's Fair?—T. J. S. A. Out of the $93,772,195 spent by visitors at the f%ir only $1,376.20 wa* found to be counterfeit or bad money. Q. When were the first soda cracker* put on the market in packages?—M. T. B. A. In 1898 the first trade-marked and packaged soda cracker was put on the * market. Q. What country is said to be at the top of the world?—C. M. S. A. Tibet has been described as such because no other part of the earth is so crowded with massive and lofty moun tains. The mean altitude of the entire tableland is 15,600 feet. Q. Is Vice President Gamer a member of the United States Senate?—C. S. A. He presides over the Senate, but is not a member and has no precedence or patronage as such. _ Q. On what date does winter begin?— M. J. S. A. This year winter will begin on De cember 22. Maternal Beech This beech it seemed was made for i brooding boys. It chose a certain hillside in "the sun. A southern hill, the first one warmed in springs. A resting place where birds would often pause And make the bareness blossom with their wings. I have seen finches there in April dawn Turning the beech into a mystery. But getting back to boys again. That tree Spread generous branches, and always kept some low » Enough for boys to re^ch and swing themselves Like squirrels up the side. And high above There were great sturdy forks just asking floors Of those who know the beauty of a house Among the tops of trees. So certain boughs Held sure retreat that never closed its doors Among the leaves and heaven. Sorrow -came there, , ^ Joy, experiment. The tree would under stand. It never minded either dirt or noise. And seemed the happiest always when the boys Were clambering through. Initials marked that trunk ; Prom top to bottom and symbols strangely wrought. There were some parents In the neigh borhood Who thought they knew their sons. The tree, I think. Knew them far better. It grew to have a look Strangely maternal, suited well to one Whose fruit was really boys. Its boughs held swings. Its leaves were singed with fires the boys had built, • Its very heart was often scarred with knives. A And when the lightning took it—it was missed. One youngster said, “Different—without the Tree!” And I agreed, knowing it held for him The same attraction it had held for me. I tried to add I thought there was no ending, The beech would live on still in all our ‘ minds ... And he shrugged, “Yeah," and hitching up his breeches Went for a walk alone. I sort of knew How he was grieving for that beat of beeches, Z felt that way myself.... O. 0. COBLENTZ. i A