Newspaper Page Text
fitting Pirn” With Sunday Morning Edition. THEODORE W. NOYES, Editor. WASHINGTON, D. C. WEDNESDAY.-February 7, 1940 The Evening Star Newspaper Company. Main Office: 11th St and Pennsylvania Ave. New York Office: 110 East 42nd 8t. Chicago Office: 435 North Michigan Ave. Prices Effective January 1, 1940. Delivered by Carrier—City and Suburban. Regular Edition. Evening and Sunday 75c per mo. or 18c per week The Evening Star .. 45c per mo. or 10c per week The Sunday Star _ _10c Per copy Night Pinal Edition. Night Pinal and Sunday Star-85c per month Night Pinal Star_ _60c per month Rural Tube Delivery. The Evening and Sunday 8tar_85c per month The Evening Star_65c per month The Sunday Star_10c per copy Collection made at the end of each month or each week. Orders may be sent py mall or tele phone National 5000. Rate by Mail—Payable in Advance. Daily and Sunday..1 yr.. $12.00; 1 mo.. $1.00 Daily only _1 yr.. $8 00: 1 mo.. 75tf Sunday only_1 yr.. $5.00; 1 mo.. 60c Entered as second-class matter post office. Washington. D. C. Member of the Associated Press. The Associated Press Is exclusively entitled to the use for republication of all news dispatches credited to it or not otherwise credited in this paper and also the local news published herein. All tights of publication of snecial aispatches herein also are reserved. rlanes tor Finland • The people of Finland, men, women and children behind the fighting lines, who have been the victims of merciless and barbarous bombard ments by the Russian air force, may take new hope from the disclosure that fifty carloads of Italian planes have passed through France en route to the little Baltic republic. Shipped originally through Germany, these planes were held up on orders from Hitler, and after protracted diplo matic discussions they were sent back to Italy and then rerouted through France. Although there has been no state ment as to the number of planes in the shipment, it is probable that there are enough of them to form the nucleus of the force of “several hun dred planes” which foreign observers say would enable the Finnish airmen to afford a substantial measure of protection to the undefended cities, towns and villages that are now the targets of Soviet bombers. Recent reports from Finland have made it only too clear that Stalin, his troops repulsed on all fronts by Fin nish ground forces, is seeking on a scale never before attempted to win his undeclared war by crushing the opponent’s civilian population. Day after day the Red bombers, making no pretense of confining their attacks to military objectives, have droned over Finland, maiming and killing the non-combatants. Against this “modern” method of war, the Finns, woefully lacking in anti-aircraft artillery and combat planes, have no defense, and in the end it may well be expected to nullify the magnifi cent stand of their ground forces unless help is speedily forthcoming. Italy, of course, has a selfish inter est in coming to the aid of the Finns. If Russia is stalemated or beaten on the Scandinavian Peninsula, if the heralded Red Army can be shown to have clay feet. Italy’s position in the Balkans, toward which a triumphant Russia might turn, would be im measurably strengthened. Realizing that he has that interest in the out come of the Russo-Finnish combat, Mussolini has not hesitated to sup port tne Finns. This country has nothing in com mon with Italy and has no interest in the outcome of the conflict which parallels that of Mussolini. But it will hardly be contended that the defeat of the Finns would mean nothing to us. America has no sphere of influence in the Balkans which needs to be protected, but it does have a vital interest in the preserva tion of democracy—even in so remote an outpost as Finland. Unless the opponents of effective American aid to the Finns are of the opinion that the destruction of an other democratic people is a matter of no moment to the United States they would do well to consider the example set by 11 Duce. His interest is alien to ours, but such as it is, he does not hesitate to protect it because of finely spun legalistic objections, nor does he seem to fear, despite his relatively exposed position, that Sta lin will treat his extension of aid to Finland as a hostile act toward Russia. Power Rate Cut Once again the advantages result ing to District residents and business interests from the adoption in De cember, 1934, of a sliding scale plan for annual adjustment of rates of the Potomac Electric Power Co. has been demonstrated. The Public Utilities Commission has issued an order for another rate reduction, for the sixteenth consecutive year. This reduction in rates will mean a saving of more than a half-million dollars to District consumers. There was an issue again this year as to how the amount available for rate reduction should be divided be tween residential and commercial consumers of power. Roughly, 27 per cent was given to residential users and the remainder to commercial customers. This appears to be a fair division since the commission based Its action on the relative amounts of current used by the respective clas sifications. More important, it seems, are the facts that while power interests may have had doubts in the beginning as to the practicality of the sliding scale, the company has continued to make considerable profits through all the years of the plan; and the best available evidence indicates that the local commercial power plant has provided rates that on the average are lower than those in any other large city in the country. Washington, of course, does not have many plants which fall Into the class of heavy Industries, a con dition which would affect the charges to be made on industrial schedules. Stockholders will rejoice over the fact that the power company once again has shown a good profit, while current users will be glad to learn that, due to efficient operation, the company has shown excess profits which will be reflected in reduced rates. Civil Liberties At a closed meeting of its govern ing committees, the American Civil Liberties Union has voted to exclude from office or committee member ship avowed defenders of totalitarian dictatorships in any form—whether Communistic, Fascist or Nazi—and members of organizations with “ob vious anti-democratic objectives or practices.” The ban will not apply to rank and file # members of the union. Significantly or not, the action of this group, which has set itself up as a watchdog of eivil rights, coincides with the resignation from its chair manship of Rev. Dr. Harry F. Ward, who was mentioned prominently in the recent report of the Dies Com mittee as head of the so-called “Communist front” group, the Amer ican League for Peace and Democ racy. Dr. Ward has since resigned from the league, which has an nounced plans for disbandment, due to need “for a different program and type of organization.” While not questioning the right under our democratic form of gov ernment for any persons to “hold and utter any 6pinions” on political or economic questions, the Civil Lib erties Union has recognized the utter inconsistency that results when any of its leaders or spokesmen pleads with one breath for American free dom of speech, of religion and of press, and with the next breath for support of alien totalitarian doc trines diametrically opposed to such democratic precepts. “Such a dual position in these days, when issues are far sharper and more profound,” the union forthrightly pointed out, “makes it desirable that the Civil Liberties Union make its position unmistakably clear.” A minority of the organization op posed the exclusion resolution on the ground that it will tend to “embroil the union in the heated ideological battles going on all over the world.” But surely there is more likelihood of such embroilment if persons holding responsible positions in the union are more concerned with defending for eign ideologies than with preserving American democratic principles. Adhering to these principles, the union properly will continue to de fend the rights of citizens of all po litical faiths—even the Communists and Fascists who, curiously, never hesitate to claim the protection of a form of government which they hold in contempt. The Civil Liberties Union has added to its prestige by acting to keep its leadership thor oughly American and democratic. Victory tor Government The Government has scored an important victory in the drive against malpractices in the building trades industry with the conclusion of the case instituted in Pittsburgh, where fines totaling more than fifty four thousand dollars were assessed against electrical contractors, cor porations and union leaders who pleaded no defense to the conspiracy, indictments under the Anti-Trust Act which is being employed as the weapon of prosecution in the Nation wide cleanup. The heaviest penalty—a fine of seven thousand dollars—was reserved for the business agent of a local of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, an A. F. of L. affiliate, who was described by the United States attorney in charge of the case as the “complete dictator” of the electrical contracting industry in Pittsburgh, while another union official was fined three thousand. Other penalties for the forty-two contractors and thirteen corpora tions involved ranged from fifty dol lars to five thousand, while one union officer was cleared. The defendants were accused of collusive bidding on public works that had cost the Government a half-million dollars and, while heav ier fines and imprisonment were possible, the penalties they received served the ends of justice in the light of their plea, and unquestionably will tend to have a marked moral effect throughout the industry. The fines were the first imposed on union members in the current campaign. The windup in Pittsburgh coin cided with another blast against the Department of Justice by the Execu tive Council of the A. F. of L., which insists on viewing the long string of indictments thus far obtained against labor and building operators as an attempt to crush the unions rather than an effort to bring about obviously needed reform. In such developments as have taken place in this particular instance, however, where no defense to the charges was offered, these at tacks by Federation leaders collapse completely. Community Chest Early in the winter, the most severe in a score of years, Washington resi dents learned they again had failed to contribute the minimum amount of mbney needed by sixty-seven agencies to carry on necessary wel fare, relief and character-building work In their city. This was after the amount sought had been reduced r > \ from that asked the previous year. But the outlook Is encouraging in spite of the failure to reach the goal. Although that goal has not been reached In recent years, Washington has not established a “habit of fail ure.” In the last campaign more con tributors than ever before joined in this civic enterprise, and the Capital stands high both in the ratio of givers to population and in the total amount raised. In presenting his report to the annual meeting of vol unteers and agency representatives, Coleman Jennings, president, point ed to two serious problems which confront the Chest. It is true that this method of raising funds for vital community needs has eliminated hundreds of more costly individual drives for funds, the expense of ad ministration has been reduced to a minimum and the financing of the member institutions has been placed upon a sound footing. But, in spite of the consolidation of so large a part of the city’s responsibilities in these lines, more than fifty fund-raising campaigns were held last year. Few, If anv nf fKn lniu. ....ij i__i -„ . - •MWVV* V/VSUAU uc V.I1CX1*" lenged as unnecessary, and many could be handled in no other banner, but they do present a complication which should be remembered by every potential Chest contributor while his hand is still in his pocket. The second problem is that of per manent financing for many of the member institutions. Budgets in every case have been cut to an abso lute minimum, even below actual needs in many. Physical equipment replacement and capital investments necessary to preserve existing facili ties and to broaden the field of serv ice to the community have been forced to languish. If the present level of contributions to the Chest continues, this can only be provided for by future bequests and the even tual building of endowment funds to meet a large part of the burden. These problems of civic welfare cannot be allowed to continue per manently on a basis of hand-to mouth existence. Many individuals may so object to inclusion of one or more organizations in the Chest’s roster as to reduce their contribu tions. Such an attitude, while it is known to exist, results from personal prejudice or lack of information. The former cannot be met by any means except an appeal to personal logic. But the Chest has provided means to counteract any lack of in formation. “Go and see” tours are provided before each campaign, and nearly every agency on the roll wel comes visitors at any time. ———_ A Baffling Disease Somehow a rumor started that a German doctor, now at the front, had discovered a cure for one of the most baffling maladies known to man—leukemia. A little Washington girl was ill of this disease which up to the present has proved, so far as known, inevi tably fatal. Any exceptions, it may be pointed out, are probably cases of a pseudo-leukemia only discovered within the last few months by biol ogists of the Carnegie Institution of Washington. This is something to be remembered if any over-enthusiastic physician claims to have effected a “cure.” The German doctor in question, it seems, has made no such claims. If he had found a remedy, the Reich government was willing to co-operate in obtaining a supply of it and the British government was willing to lift : the blockade to get it to Washington in time to be of some help to the child. It was a fine case of universal human decency underlying war. The rumor may have originated from the fact that certain experi mental work with leukemia in rats during the last three years—Ameri can, not German, by the way—has brought about a considerable ad vance in understanding of the leu kemic process. No case, it may be said, ever has been cured. Leukemia is “cancer of the blood.” A certain type of white blood cell begins to increase out of all propor tion to the rest of the blood cells. The cause is unknown. The malady constitutes about the worst possible type of neoplasm because it is so dif fuse, and hence inaccessible to radi ation therapy or to surgery. A “cure for leukemia” would probably be a cure for all other types of malignant growths. Some prolongation of life may be possible with blood transfusions. These, however, never can be more than temporary palliatives and, usu ally in a very short time, the malig nant processes again have the upper hand. There seems to be an idea, even among some physicians, that some good might be accomplished with the blood of a person who has suffered from the malady and recov ered. Since nobody, so far as is known, has ever recovered from true leukemia this is beside the point. The outlook is not utterly hopeless. The Carnegie experiments indicate that rats can be protected against the disease by a sort of vaccination with killed leukemic cells. They can not be cured, once the malady is un derway. But prevention and cure often are not far apart. For many decades school children have read with amazement and almost incredulity of “The Hundred Years’ War” and “The Thirty Years’ War.” For all they know, they may be living right now in another.1 Those who tried to tune in'' on Father Coughlin last Sunday may be added to the list of those who have encountered “The Little Man Who Wasn’t There." I n \ Motorists Blamed for Pedestrian Injuries Says New Regulation Is Not Properly Enforced By Police To the Editor of The Star: According to an Item In your paper, the traffic director at a recent meeting of parents and teachers cited figures showing pedestrian injuries had de creased from 1,793 to 1,675 in the District during the 10-month period the pedes trian-control regulation has been in force. Evidently the director could have made a better showing for his pet regulatory measure than a 6.6 per cent decrease in the number of injuries, for in the course of his remarks he declared motorists are not doing their full part in making the new pedestrian-protection program a success, and called attention to in stapces where motorists interfered with pedestrians crossing on proper signal. Aroiliiicr f nr cfHrfor anfnrnnnsanf nf the pedestrian regulation in the outlying sections, the director referred to the 12.8 per cent decline in injuries to persons afoot in the central district, where the number dropped from 289 to 252. This leaves 1,423 injuries sustained outside the downtown area. If so many accidents to pedestrians are happening outside the central district it woulu be interesting to know why the downtown section is so strongly policed, while so few or no policemen are stationed at busy outlying intersections. To many observers the pedestrian regulation apparently was not adopted as a protective measure for persons afoot, but to speed up vehicular traffic through the congested downtown area. The measure was sponsored by organi 'zations of motorists and merchants with an eye more to their own convenience than that of pedestrians. The milling crowds of pedestrians in the downtown section seriously ham pered the movement of vehicles. The pedestrian-control regulation, backed by a policeman at every corner to see that it is obeyed, at least by persons afoot if not those awheel, has somewhat re lieved the embarrassment of motorists in an agonizing hurry. Daily at the corner near where my business is located, as well as elsewhere, I observe motorists failing to yield the right of way to pedestrians on proper signal, while the officer on duty, en grossed with his effort to keep vehicular traffic from becoming snarled, pays no attention to motorists interfering with pedestrians and beating the lights in a mad scramble to cross the intersection. That there should be so dispropor tionately large a number of accidents to walkers in the outlying sections serves to emphasize what the director has pointed out, that motorists are not doing their full part in according pedestrians the right of way on cross walks. In the outlying sections pedestrians are com paratively few. They do not move in crowds as in the downtown area. Ve hicular movement is uninterrupted and rapid and the pedestrian must take chances to cross the street. Until mo torists learn to obey driving rules scrupu lously little progress can be made in accident prevention. The deep interest I take in safe driv ing and walking prompts me to wonder whether the director and other persons wrestling with the problem of accident prevention may not be on the wrong track in advocating such a questionable measure as pedestrian control, especially if tbe tendency of motorists to* disobey the rules cannot be curbed. Like a page from the Mother Goose story book was a conspicuous red and green advertisement carried in buses and streetcars recently, advising the public that the way to remain alive is to obey the lights. Obedience on the part of pedestrians to the present sys tem of traffic signals is no guarantee of auteiy ur longevity. Since motorists will not yield the right of wray to pedestrians on cross walks isn't it unfair that persons afoot should be subject to the annoyance of arrest and conviction for crossing on a red light when there are no approaching vehicles? Fining overtaxed people in discriminately for petty violations of traffic rules has a bad reaction on a community. The police drive against pedestrians should be discontinued at least until all controlled intersections are provided with pedestrian lights which would permit persons afoot to cross the streets without danger from vehicles turning corners. MARGARET MALCOM. February 2. (Editor's note—of 66 pedestrians killed in traffic last year, two were struck while crossing at a controlled Intersection with the proper signal. Thirty-one were killed crossing not at a crosswalk. Seventeen were killed crossing at an uncontrolled intersec tion. Eight were killed crossing against the proper signal.) “Working Wives.” To the Editor of The Star: It seems that M. P. S. has had her toes stepped on and in her letter to The Star of January 26 she lashes back at the “complaining Johns who deem it their mission in life to agitate in the interest of eliminating married women from competition with them.” All through her letter one is given the impression that “married women” are the martyrs of the age. What does a woman expect of life these days? Does she not want some kind of a home, no matter how small, Where she can raise her young ones in the right atmosphere? And where they can live a clean and healthful life, and give her something to look forward to and be proud of in her future years? I do not begrudge women their right to the "true American ideals of equal opportunity to all,” but let them decide on a career in the world or a career in the home. Each is an opportunity in itself. In closing I might add that a little self-sacrifice on the part of married couples today might help eliminate the necessity of the poor “married women” having to go to work, and it would, also, have an equal effect in the training of their children. J. BURFORD RODIER • January 31. r* ♦ THIS AND THAT I By Charles E. Tracewell "CHEVY CHASE, Md. “Dear Sir: “I should like to comment on your column of January 26 containing your remarks on that ‘demon’ the mocking bird. “I have enjoyed your column so very much that it distressed me to read your column of January 26, your uncharitable remarks and half-truths concerning this fine bird, particularly as you glorify, ever so often, that glutton of the bird kingdom, the starling. ‘‘In your column of the 26th you stated, in reply to a letter from a reader, that the mockingbird could be discouraged from coming around by not putting out the food it likes. With snow covering the ground and with all birds looking to their friends for food, your statement is uncharitable to say the least. If your readers (those unfamiliar with the true habits of the mockingbird) were to follow this advice, the mockingbirds would not be long with us. “We have had mockingbirds with us for the past several wintdw. They come to our window sill for raisins, suet, meal worms, etc., that are always on hand. On the sill next to the one re served for his majesty, the mockingbird, we put sunflower seed, nuts and other tidbits for the cardinals, the. titmice, the chickadee, nuthatch, sparrows and finches, not to mention food for that pest, the starling. * * * * “It is a common sight and not a rare j one to see the mockers on one sill, the other birds on the other sill at one and the same time. Where food has been put on both sills, I have never seen the mockingbird even attempt to bother the other birds. ‘‘In this connection, it must be remem bered that the mockingbird is a soft billed bird, consequently the food it is able to eat is not as plentiful as that available for the seed-eating birds, the cardinals, sparrows and finches. The mocker’s food supply is therefore limited and this being true it is somewhat na tural to expect them to safeguard their cache of raisins, meal worms, etc. With all the feeders in this neighborhood going full blast there is no dearth of seed and gTain for the hard-billed birds, the sparrows, finches, etc. The mock ingbird is not this lucky. He is fight ing to live. ‘‘I have studied and loved birds for nigh on to 35 years and I have yet to find a mockingbird as pugnacious as those of whom you write. They have never kept me from enjoying my garden except where I have intruded on the privacy of their nest. However, have you ever annoyed wrens when they have young, or disturbed a brown thrasher’s nest with eggs or young? You then know that the mockingbird is not unique in expressing irritation at a trespasser in his home. ‘‘Aside from this. I challenge any one to say that the mockingbird is a garden bully. If you will stay away from his nest in the enjoyment of your garden he will be only too glad to stay away from you. Speaking from yearly experience, I would say that my nemesis is that little fellow the wren who refuses to let me mow the lawn beneath his wren box. * * * * “May I ask that you be a little more charitable toward the mockingbird and a little more accurate in your remarks concerning its habits. This will be greatly appreciated by the genuine ad mirers of this bird whose admiration is based upon an intelligent study of its way of life. "Many readers of your column accept as gospel truth every word you write about birds and while you are usually correct, it bothers the true bird students to have your readers, or some of them, hug to their breasts such inaccuracies as from time to time appear in your column concerning the mockingbird, America’s finest songster. “I will appreciate your comments on this letter in your column so that the injustice done this fine bird may be corrected. It is only fair that the other side of the picture be presented to your readers through the same medium your half-truths appeared. “Sincerely yours, W. A. N.” * * * * Mr. N., whose reputation as a bird lover extends far beyond Chevy Chase, has indulged in that favorite indoor sport, setting up a straw man and knock ing him down. Nobody, we feel safe in saying, has any greater admiration for the mockingbird than the writer of this column. We simply refuse to argue the point with Mr. N. But when a reader asks a question, we try to answer him to the best of our ability. If he wants to know how to keep a tough mockingbird away, the answer is not to put out the foods the bird likes. That is, undoubtedly, the way to do it. This advice only seems uncharitable, for today thousands of persons are feed ing the birds hereabouts, whereas only a few hundreds were doing so four years ago when we started boosting this won derful recreation. Now the point is that hundreds of them, especially when snow is on the ground, use bread, which is exactly what the mocker likes, even above raisins. This means that no mockingbird is going hungry. Our correspondent's remarks about the bird's food habits are quite true. It is well to keep in mind that the soft billed birds cannot eat what the mem bers of the finch family, to which be longs the sparrows, do. Mr. N. has been very fortunate in his mockers. Last year this column carried dozens of letters, scores of them, in fact, from irate persons in all parts of the city, castigating, lampooning, be rating, belittling, hurling imprecations at, and in other ways asking how to get relief from the "mockingbird problem,” as they called it. We say again, as we have said many times, that birds are where and how you find them. Letters to the Editor rroirsis iii'KCimg oi Snow-Bound Cars. To the Editor of The Star: May I add my emphatic protest to that of your correspondent of January 31 anent the ticketing of cars that are snow-bound. This sort of thing breeds bad feeling toward the Police Department and makes citizens distrust not only the judgment of the officers but that of their policy making directors. The police need the co-operation of the right-thinking citizenry to function effectively. They certainly have called down a storm of protest over their re cent ill-advised procedure. I believe that if the victims of their zeal took the matter to court they would win under the “act of God’’ clause of law. But who wants to go to court with its expense and nuisance? These mat ters ought to be adjustable by reasonable people. I am not one of the ones who got ticketed, but I feel indignant Just the same. D. February 1. Complains of Noise By Celebrants. To the Editor of The Star: Inasmuch as the President’s Ball Is given in order to alleviate disease, doesn't it seem inconsistent for the participants to go tearing along the streets after midnight blowing motor horns with in credible zest and fury, thereby torturing the nerves of armies of people that desire rest? In this noisy, nerve-racking age it might be well for those who love to "whoop it up” to remember that Zeno, of all virtues, chose “silence,” while Balzac’s remedy for tired, wounded hearts was “silence and shade.” Revel lers seldom realize that people of a differ ent temperament prefer quiet. EDMUND K. GOLDSBOROUGH. January 31. Proposes Military Training For C. C. C. Youths. To the Editor of The Star: When the history of this period is finally written, it will be recorded that its greatest contribution to character building on a national scale was the founding of the Civilian Conservation Corps. Here the Nation puts its idle youth to work at useful tasks, instructs them in the simple truths of life, trains them in work from which an honest liv ing may be derived when the service is over, and here they learn impressively that our country values the individual so highly that it will spend much money and effort to help make him the noblest of living creatures, an honest man, free, loving freedom, and knowing how freedom must be used if it is to be pre served. Why does not the United States Government give these fine young men the opportunity to obtain military train ing in these camps? There is no sound reason against it. If they want it, they should have the chance. It would put before them an educational opportunity of the greatest character-building value. If it is a wise policy tq require military training in the land-grant colleges, it would be wise at least to offer it in these camps. In case of war these young men would be drafted, like others in the same age group, and they should have the opportunity the college man has of being Letters to the Editor must bear the name and address of the writer although the use of a pseudonym for publication is permissible. Please be brief! prepared to meet this call, should it come. Scarcely less astonishing than our failure to offer the young men in the . C. C. C. camps an opportunity to take I military training is the neglect of our i Government to make more of the Civil ' ian Military Training Camps. Here is a comparatively inexpensive method of training civilians in circumstances thou sands of men all over the country would welcome as an opportunity to serve the Nation and to improve themselves physi cally and mentally. I cannot but believe that an ill-advised but noisy pacifism has frightened those responsible for na tional military policy into a course of conduct good neither for the Nation as a whole nor the individual citizen. Let the person who shouts "militarism” shout on. No sane person can stand apart and view man's behavior in Eu rope and Asia and still believe that such concepts as “right,” "justice,” “moral or intellectual integrity,” or cries of “peace, peace!” exert any appreciable influence on the conduct of certain powers. s. J. February 5. Proposal to Aid Finland Opposed. To the Editor of The Star: I believe that nearly all the American people are in sympathy with Finland; nevertheless, I believe our Government should make no loan to Finland. We should first of all take care of the mil lions of Americans living in dire poverty. If we loan to Finland, other countries also may ask for loans, and our last World War loans turned out to be gifts instead of loans. Let Sweden, Norway and Denmark and other European countries help Fin land. They have more at stake than we Americans several thousand miles *way. j. M M Detroit, Mich. February 4. South Capitol Street Bridge Plans Discussed. To the Editor ol The Star: The featured story in last Sunday's Star showing the progress being made toward the construction of the proposed South Capitol Street Bridge no doubt was read with a great deal of interest by those who were advocating this pro ject around 1915. At that time it was one of the aims of the Washington-Indian Head Win throp Military Highway Association, of which the writer was the secretary treasurer for a number of years. Our Representative in Congress, Mr. Sidney Mudd, went so far as td draft a bill for its construction at that time, but the measure was not introduced. Surely, during this Interim the pressing need for a more direct approach into Washington from the South has increased to a point where the organizations active in its behalf should bring this improvement to a successful conclusion. THEODORE F. MENK. February 8. Haskin's Answers To Readers' Questions by Frederic J. Haskin. A reader can get the answer to any question of fact by writing The Eve ning Star Information Bureau, Fred eric J. Haskin, director, Washington, D. C. Please inclose stamp tor reply. Q. What became of the famous hors* Gypsy Queen?—L. W. A. Gypsy Queen died on October 29, 1936. The horse has been honored by a bronze memorial tablet in the Ro6a Bon heur Memorial Pet Animal Cemetery in Maryland. Gypsy Queen's fame was established by carrying Sergt. Frank M. Heath, United States Army and World War veteran, 11,356 miles on the longest trail ever traveled by one horse under saddle, covering each of the 48 States of the Union. They started at the Zero Milestone in Washington, D. C., on April 1, 1925 and ended at the same point on November 4, 1927. Q. Please give the names of the piano selections played by Fredric March in "The Road to Glory.”—J. W. E. A. They were as follows: “Piano Im provisation,” by David Buttolph; "Made Ion,” by C. Roberts: “Liebestraum, Noc turne No. 3,” by Liszt, and "Prelude, Opus 28, No. 7,” by Chopin. Q. Who invented mayonnaise?—R. G. H. A. This kind of salad dressing is said to have been originated by the Duke of Richelieu. Q. Where was the first lyceum in the United States?—L. B. A. An organized plan of instruction for adults was inaugurated under the name lyceum in Millbury, Mass., in 1826. This was a voluntary association of farmers and mechanics formed for self-culture, community instruction, and mutual discussion of common public interests. By 1839 more than 3,000 town lyceums were in existence . Q. Who said, “'Lafayette, we are here"? —J. R. B. A. The phrase is taken from a speech delivered July 4, 1917, at Picpus Ceme tery, Paris, by Col. C. E. Stanton: "Amer ica has joined forces with the allied powers, and what we have of blood and treasure are yours. Therefore it is that with loving pride we drape the colors in tribute of respect to this citizen of your great republic. And here and now in the presence of the illustrious dead we pledge our hearts and our honor in carrying this war to a successful issue. Lafayette, we are here.” Q. Please give the origin of court ten nis.—T. L. B. A. The Encyclopedia of Sports says: "Court tennis, first known as jeu de paume. originally was an outdoor game, and was played in the Middle Ages in the parks and fosses of chateaux in France and Italy. Its patrons included a long line of European monarchs and its popularity among royalty is responsi ble for its present name. A court built by Henry VIII at Hampton Palace is still extant and celebrated its 400th anniver sary in 1930.” Q. Who was John McDonogh for whom the boys' school in Maryland was named? —K. C. R. A. John McDonogh was bom In Bal timore in 1779. He went to New Or leans in 1800 to represent a Baltimore firm. By 1803 he had acquired real estate in Louisiana and West Florida which came in time to have great value. He was vice president of the American Colonization Society and worked out a scheme whereby slaves were enabled in 15 years’ time to purchase their own freedom. He sent many of his own slaves to Liberia in this manner. On his death in 1850 he left a will providing j schools for boys in New Orleans and Baltimore. Q. Who was the first President to have his inaugural address broadcast?— L. S. R. A. On March 4, 1925. there was a Nation-wide broadcast of the inaugura tion of President Coolidge. Q. Where were dial telephones first used in the United States?—J. G. E. A. The dial telephone was invented in 1889 by A. B. Strowger and was put into general use in La Porte, lnd.t in 1891. Q. How old is Atlantic City, N. J.?— H. S. A. The little fishing settlement which later became known as Atlantic City dates from 1780. In 1854, the Camden & Atlantic Railroad was completed to this city and in that same year, it was in corporated under the name Atlantic City. Q. How many different kinds of United States stamps have been issued to date? —W. OB. A. The Post Office Department says that there have been 558 stamp issues printed since 1847. Q. What famous poet was drowned while trying to kiss the reflection of the moon in the water?—A. G. S. A. It is believed that this was the fate of Li Tai Po, Chinese poet of the Tang dynasty. Q. From what State was the first woman Senator in Congress?—H. P. S. A. Rebecca Latimer Felton of Georgia was appointed by Gov. Thomas W. Hard wick as a Democrat to the tfnited Statee Senate on October 3, 1922, to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Senator Thomas E. Watson. * A Pa m a a rrayer Tor Lenr Dear Lord, I pray that through these days of Lent, I may with You seek now the wilderness, Within my heart—let not the care and stress Of daily need—or love of self prevent My willingness to go as once You went, Apart with God. But let my soul confess My lack of faith and great unworthiness, And humbly there each secret fault repent. Then give me, Lord, a clean desire and strong, To do Your will through every bright new day, Knowing full well that You will guide the way, And help me choose the right—reject the wrong. And may these forty days be full of grace, To all who truly seek the Father’s fact. MONICA WILLIAMS. ♦ f