Newspaper Page Text
Act Is Cited OnCampaign Books Non-Prosecution Course of Jackson Is Questioned By DAVID LAWRENCE. There Is something mysterious about the apparent refusal of At torney General Jackson to enforce the Federal Corrupt Practices Act as it refers to the Democratic National Com mittee and its campaign book, for which it collects money from corpora tions in violation of the existing statutes. Earlier this week, the At torney General in a letter to Senator Hatch called attention to the fact that David Lawrence. while the present Hatch law, en acted on July 19, 1940, “provides penalties for those who buy books or advertising, we find no penalty for those who sell them.” Within the last 24 hours the Dem- . ocratic National Committee an- ' nounced that it was in process of publishing a campaign book full of advertising, and when its spokes men were queried about it, the answer was given that the sellers of advertising space were not cover ed by the Hatch law. 1925 Act in Force. But, unhappily for the sellers and buyers of advertising space in any book issued by any political com mittee, the Federal Corrupt Prac tices Act of 1925 is still on the statute books, and the Hatch laws j of 1939 and 1940 are “in addition to and not in substitution for" the j previous statutes governing elec- ■ tion practices. In the law of 1925. know'n generally as the Federal j Corrupt Practices Act, appears the following section 251: “It is unlawful for any national j bank, or any corporation organized j by authority of any law of Con gress, to make a contribution in connection with any election to any political office, or for any corpo ration whatever to make a con tribution in connection with any election at which presidential and vice presidential electors or a Sen ator or Representative in Congress j are to be voted for, or for any candidate, political committee, or other person to accept or receive any contribution prohibited by this section. Every corporation which j makes any contribution in viola tion of this section shall be fined j not more than $5,000: and every officer or director of any corpora tion who consents to any contribu tion by the corporation in violation of this section shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year or both. “Section 252: Any person who violates any of the foregoing pro- ; visions of this chanter, except those for which a specific penalty is im posed by section 208 and section i 251 of this title, shall be fined not ! more than $1,000 or imprisoned not J more than one year, or both.” Defines Contribution. Now what is a “contribution”? ! This term is defined in the same Federal Corrupt Practices Act of 1925 as follows: “The term ‘contribution’ includes 8 gift, subscription, loan, advance, cr deposit, or money, or anything of value, and includes a contract, j promise or agreement, whether or j not legally enforceable, to make a contribution.” Would the Attorney General say that when a corporation buys ad vertising space in a book issued by a political committee, this is not covered by the definition “anything of value"? If there is some loop hole in the law' which protects the Democratic National Committee members from prosecution under the Federal Corrupt Practices Act, it would be interesting to' have the public told about it. Earlier this week, the Justice De partment was full of comment about the academic discussion by Henry Fletcher, counsel for the Republican National Committee, on the subject of possible contributions to State committees and organizations. Sen ator Hatch himself denounced even the talk of possible use of such loop holes. Here, however, is a case in which the Democratic National Com mittee has announced that it has collected large sums for advertising in this year's campaign book. Will Senator Hatch take an interest in this episode? If he does not, the country may as well forget the whole series of provisions in the Hatch law and make up its mind that the Democratic administration, if continued in power, will continue to wink, not only at violations al ready proved in connection with the Federal Corrupt Practices Act, but future violations of the Hatch laws Of 1939 and 1940. Can Nullify Accomplishment. The achievement of the able Democratic Senator from New Mex ico can be nullified easily by the practical politicians who may con trol the law enforcement machinery of the Federal Government. If throughout the country the rank and file of politicians see the Justice Department overlooking plain violations of the Federal Cor rupt Practices Act, they will tend to believe that nothing serious will happen to them if they contravene the Hatch laws. Maybe Senator Hatch will show his courage once more and demand of his own party that the national committee turn back to all donors the funds received for the campaign book, or that in dictments be asked for at once from grand juries for all who may have played a part in the collection of funds for the Democratic campaign book this year. (Reproduction Rights Reserved.) Missourian to Preach At Ngtional City “A Beatitude for Hard Days” will be the subject of the sermon by Dr. C. E. Lemmon of Columbia, Mo., at th*: National City Christian Church Sunday morning. Dr. Lemmon is occupyipg the pulpit during August. Miss Maxwell Galloway and E. E. Condron will sing ‘‘Tarry With Me, O My Savior,” by Nicolai. The young people’s meeting will be in the Vermont Avenue Building at 6:30 pm. k fk The Capital Parade Donovan's Glowing Report on England's Chances Regarded as Officially Optimistic British View By JOSEPH ALSOP and ROBERT KINTNER. Col. William J. Donovan, who was sent to England to survey the war situation for Secretary of the Navy Knox, hate returned to the United States with a glowing report on England’s chances. From the President down, no member of the administration has heard such Cheerful news since Count Rene de Chambrun arrived, fresh from Dunkerque, with the same sort of data and opinions. Col. Donovan, who saw pretty nearly every one worth seeing In England, may be regarded as the transmitter of the officially optimistic English view. He is understood to lay heavy emphasis on three main points: 1. While admitting an immense German superiority in numbers of aircraft. Col. Donovan accepts the English thesis that their air force is so much better than the German, plane for plane and man for man, as to counter-balance the Germans’ numerical advantage. Capt. Kel sey, the American air attache who also returned recently irom Lon don, makes the same point after seeing both air forceyin action. 2. Col. Donovan lays great em phasis on seasonal conditions. The moon and the tide, he argues, will be right for an invasion of England only for a few days more. If the Germans miss this chance, in his opinion, they may have to postpone their grand assault until spring. 3. Co Donovan also talks much of the magnificent English morale. Taking all the factors together, he contends that the Germans probably cannot establish a bridgehead on English soil, and that if they succeed in landing troops, they will eventually be repulsed. The Gloomy Experts The only trouble with the optimistic forecasts of men like Col. Donovan and Count de Chambrun. and even with such isolated expert opinions as Capt. Kelsey’s, is that they simply do not coincide with the j judgments of the American War and Navy Department experts who , have all the facts at their command. These men, and the State Department officials for whom the course of the war is of the utmost importance, are decidedly gloomy without exception. Only the most cheerful put the English chances at even— ’!? ong as additional destroyers are not made available to the English 1 avy. Many paint so dark a picture of the future that it is almost impossible not to wonder whether they, or the politicians who behave h Jiv0™* fe^’°!'lrf Tr„e rocking a!one as usual, have not gone collec tively out of their minds. Dark Thoughts In casting up the balance, the prophets of gloom allow little weight to moiale Except that they consider the next 60 days as “the fighting season, they think the seasonal factor unimportant. Always excepting tne destroyer question they admit the excellence of the English Navy BUt ^PlaCe fa£, th,e greatest emphasis on the situation in the air. „hfT9^- Gern'lan’Enghsh air strength ratio is commonly estimated at f=. oV 2 ,t<\1' E£latlvel-v- the German superiority in bombing planes Sweater. Germany has the whole European Atlantic coast to attack from, and can send a load of bombs over English ports, factories an.lalrfields ln 2?e'thlrd of the time Jt takes an English bomber to reach a v.tal centei. Thus, despite the gallantry of the R A. P raids on Ger hi^g ar?d regarded as inescapably consigned for the present to 1 ] ghi,y di,sadvantageous defensive role. It is doubted, therefore whether the English plane-for-plane, man-for-man advantage can turn the trick, as Col. Donovan predicts So far the experts generally agree, although some paint a still darker picture. They also generally agree in believing that the German Maryann. WHERE IS MY SMilLAlAM y II . air force has been tuning up, to date, with desultory raids on Eng land, probably while waiting for quantity production of improved types, and is expecting the real attack to come before the "fighting season" passes. They do not agree as to the pattern of the attack. The most convincing theory is that a tremendous air assault on England, using almost the full German strength, will come first. Then, under cover of intensive air warfare, forces now concentrating in Norway will attempt to take possession of the Shetland and Faroe Islands and perhaps of Ireland, while fifth columnists, who have been observed in great numbers, may also try to seize the Azores. Simultaneously the Italian drive against Suez may be supplemented by a big operation against Gibraltar. In the end, if this strategy succeeds, England will be pulverized, surrounding “siege points-’ will have been established and England's vital sea communications will be seriously threatened. Thus the way will be prepared for the actual invasion of England, which may be considerably delayed. It is not a pleasant forecast, but it deserves careful consideratidn. ___(Released by North American Newspaper Alliance, Inc.) Service Orders ARMY. CAVALRY. Gerhardt. Lt. Col. Charles H.. from Mon terey. Calif. to Washington Clendenen. Mai. Clarence C.. from Port Bliss to Fort Defiance. INFANTRY. Wadsworth. Lt. Col. Herbert A, from Corvallis. Creg.. to Boston. Alexander. Mai. Raich E.. from Fort Thomas to Fort Benning. McCutcheon. Lt. Col. William H., from Puerto Rico to Davton. Ohio. Montesinos, Mat. Miguel, from Puerto Rico to Arlington Cantonment. SIGNAL CORPS. Stice. Mai Kenneth S. from Fort Mon mouth to Fort Bragg. Fachynski. Cam. Alvin L.. from Fort Lewis to March Field. Studer. Second Lt Robert W.. from Fort Lnwis to Camp Ord. Matejka, Mai. Jerry V.. from Fort Mon mouth to Washington. Ql artermaster corps. Quinn. Capt Howard W.. from Portsmouth. Va., to Washington. MEDICAL CORPS. Baier. Capt. George F.. :id.. from Fort Devens to Carlisle Barracks. Voeetly. First Lt. John H . from Carlisle Barracks to Fort Devens. Wildman. Capt. Thomas H. from Hot Springs National Park. Ark., to Fort Knox. Rigdon. Capt Jonathan M . from Fort Sam Houston to Camp Ord. AIR CORPS. Cary. First Lt. John B.. from Cambridge. Mass., to Mitchel Field. CORPS OF ENGINEERS Ezekiel. Capt. Raphael B . from Columbus. Ohio, to Fort Benning. Christiansen. Maj James G. from Mem phis. Tenn.. to Washington. NAVY. BUREAU OF NAVIGATION. } Clifton. Lt. Joseph C.. from U. S. S. Ranger to Pensacola. MEDICAL CORPS. Fougerousse. Lt. Comdr. Henry L, from U S. S. Detroit to Mare Island. Dickinson. Lt. George W, from Annapolis to U. S. S. Detroit. DENTAL CORPS. Daniel. Lt. (J. e l L"wis H, from Annapolis to U S. S. Texas. ASIATIC DESPATCH ORDERS. Bryant Comdr. Eliot H, to U. S. S. Asheville. Farrell. Comdr. John C., from U. S. Langley to Alameda. Cailf. McConnell. Comdr. Robert P-. to U. S. S. Langley, Abcrnethy. Lt. Comdr. Elmer P., to U. S. S. Pecos. Agcton Lt. Comdr. Arthur A, from U. E. S. Pillsbury to U. S. 8. Augusta. Atkoson. Lt. Comdr. Clarence L. C.. Jr., from U. S. S. Pope to San Francisco. Bibby. Lt. Comdr. Lowe H, from Sub marine Division in to U. S. S. Augusta. Fitzgerald. Ll. Comdr. Justin S, from U. S S Barker to Philippines. McGlone, Lt. Comdr. Louis G., to U. S. 8. Barker. McVay. Comdr. Charles B, 3rd. from Philippines to U. 8. S. Kaweah. Pound. Lt, Comdr. Harold C, to U. S. 8. Pillsbury. Ralph- Lt. Comdr. Joyce A, from U. 8. S Augusta to San Francisco. VanzanL, Lt. C’omdr. Ralston B.. to Sub marine Division 10. Wray, Lt. Comdr. Henry T., to U. S. S. Pope. Britt. Lt. Jacob W, to U. S. S. Asheville. Carlson. Lt. Spencer A, to Shanghai. Drury. Lt. Martin J.. to U. S. S. Marble head. Dunning. Lt. Allan L.. from Submarine Squadron 5 to Philadelphia. Giles, Lt. William J.. jr., to U. 8. S. John D. Edwards. Holmes, Lt. Merrill S, to U. S. 8. S-38. Jones, Lt. William T„ to Submarine Di vision 5. Miles, Lt. Lion T, to U. 8. 8. Asheville. Parker, Lt. Thomas C., from U. S. 8. Asheville to Philippines. Patton, Lt. Harold C.. from U. 8. 8. Canopus to Mare Island. Reynolds. Lt. James R. Z . to U. S. S- 8-39. Shaw. Lt, William R., from Philippines to San Francisco. Tolley, Lt. Kemp, from 4th Marines to Annapolis Abbott. Lt. (J. g 1 Edward W., from U. 8. 8. Pope to San Francisco. Baker. Lt. (j. g.) George T.. to TJ. S. 8. Bulmer. Harlfinger. Lt. (J. g 1 Frederick J, ?d, from U. S. S. 8-38 to U. S. 8 Trout. Clift. Lt. (J. g.l Giles D. from U. S. 8. Bulmer to San Francisco. Loveland. Lt. (J. g.l Kenneth, from U. 8. S. Augusta to San Francisco. Mclntire. Lt. (j. g.l Harrison. P., from TJ S. S. John D. Edwards. Pierce. Lt, George E.. from U. 8. 8. Black hawk to TJ. S. S. Buhner. McDowell. Ensign Joseph M.. to U. S. S. Marblehead. SCears. Ensign William O.. Jr., to TJ. 8. 8 Pope. Humphreys. Comdr. Lincoln fM. C.l, from U S S. Canopus to lfith Naval District. Langdon. Lt. (J. g.l Benjamin B. (M. C.l, to Destroyer Division 67. Roudebush, Lt, (J g.) Marion E. (M. C.l. from Destroyer Division 57 to 16th Naval Burns. Lt. Comdr. William R. (D. C.l. from U. 8. 8. Augusta to Yangtze Bryan.0lLt. William D. (D. C.l, from Philadelphia to U. 8. S Augusta LeClair, Lt. Victor A. fD. C.), from TJ. 8. 8. Blackhawk to Shanghai. A. Casey. Lt, (1 g i Jerome B. (D. C l. from Yangtze Patrol to U. S. S. Blackhawk. Atherton. Lt. ij. g > Harry S. is C.L from U. S S. Tulsa to San Francisco. Cole, Lt. LI. g.l Harold E. (S. C.l. from D£s’,Loye.r Division 50 to San Francisco. Winfield, Lt ij. g i Richard B. is. C.l, from Philippines to San Francisco. Grubbs, Lt lj. g.l DeWitt C. T.. jr. IS Cl, from Ibth Naval District to San Fran cisco. Mathas. Lt. (1. g.l Constantine C. (S. C.l. from U. S. S. Blackhawk to San Francisco. Sherwood Lt. (j. g.l Stephen IS. C.l, from U. S S. Pecos to San Francisco. Zfl'neI' Lt. M *■> Charles J. (S. C.). to U. S. S. Blackhawk. Davis. Lt. (j. g.) Lewis O. (S. Cl. to U S, S. Pecos, Fisher. Ensign Allan J. (S. C.l. to Destroyer Divison 50. Usher, Lt (j. g.l Harold L„ jr. (S. C.l, to U. S. S. Tulsa. Wheeler. Ensign Kenneth R. (S. C.l, to tilth Naval District. Wilson. Ensign Clifford W. <8. c.l, to U. S. S. Blackhawk. Marken. Lt. Roy R. (Ch. C.l. from Shang hai to Quantico. Trump, Lt. Herbert R. (Ch. C.l, to Shang nai. Davis. Lt. (j el James R. (C. E. C.l, to tilth Naval District. Robinson. Lt. ij g.l George S. 1C. E c.l, from Philippines to Portsmouth, N. H. Marriage License Applications Edward L. Anderson. Jr.. 22. 2507 Burns st s.e.. and Phyllis A Hook. 10. 152 11th st. s.e.; the Rev. George M. Cum mings. Harry E Welsh. 01. Alexandria. Va.. and Mary I Hanna. 55, Cadiz, Ohio; the Rev. Albert Evans. Emery R. Kiraly, 25, 4104 Garrison st n w . and Jean R Moul. 21. Garfield Hospital: the Rev Calvin H. Wingert. 0?t*e R. Jones. 20. and Helen G. Steele. both. of Arlington. Va.; the Rev. William H. Heigham. Vernon R. Cheek. .32. 1404 Oglethorpe st. 5;*- end Bernadette C. Cardin. 20. 7127 California st. n.w; the Rev. J. G. Cole. William H. Gilliam. 21. 2400 Wisconsin ave n.w., and Susan I. Carr. 22. .315 Upshur st. n.w.; the Rev. chestcen Smith. Lyle C Dennis. 30. 1044 Kalorama rd., and Maxine B. M Maxlnthal, 20. Lan caster. Wis.: Judge Robert E. Mattingly. Guy Hallman. -34. 147° U st.. and Emma L. Johnson. 27. '572 Irving st.; the „ Rev Charles T. Mitchell. Richard P Whitty Jr . 23. 5112 30th st. n w.. a-*a Ann C Stonlman. 71. chevy .—Vw*,e’ Md.- the Rev. Toamas o Rmyrh William E. cine. 24. 1350 Jefferson st. n w . and Vera L. Orr, 21, Urbana. HI.; the Re'- A. P. Wi’son. Thomas Harrison °R. 0500 Plnev Branch rd. n.w. and Dorothv T Hendricks. 20. Philaaelphla. Pa.; the Rev. William E. La Rue. Cleveland Lee. 55 and Lillian Carpenter. 50, hoth of 1221 L st. n.w.; the Rev. J. H Dunham • Ernest R Cole. 30. 3211 20th st. n.e.. and Gladvs e Beall, 30. 1035 3rd st. n.e.: the Rev, Samuel E. Rose. Frank J. Doran. 31, New York City, and Audrey M Frey. 25. 3002 Rodman st. n.w : the Rev. Albert Evans. William E. Lelshear. 1r„ 74, 5717 Sherr'er pi. n.w.. and Edith M. Moehring. 20, 1401 Sheridan st. nw.: the Rev. Franc's J Kellv. William H Spates. Jr.. 77. 539 11th st s.e.. and Hazel M. Whitlock. 27. 1772 V st. s.e.: the Rev. Edward E. Richard son. Erne-t A. nabnev. 74 and Lavinta M. Holmes. °7. both of Richmond, Va.; the Rev J. Edward Graham. Sol D. Lensev. 3°. 1013 Rhode Island ave. n e . and Lena Bumb. 70. New York City; Jud-e Robert E Matttnelv. Ca-l F. Wacne-. ir„ 70, 1707 P st.. and Patricia A. Parr. 74. Tulsa. Okla.; the Rev. Wilbur F Wheeler. Sol S Nelson. 71. and Dorothy J. Levine. "1. both of New York City; Judge Robert E Mattingly. Henry O. Thompson. 04. 511 Franklin st. n.w.. and Marearite M. Dean. 54. 907 10th st. s.e : the Rev. A F. T. Raum. Rudolf D. Schneider. 37. 079 Quebec pi. n.w.. and Elolse M. Anderson. 20. 1717 G st. n.w : the Rev. Freeley Rohrer. Robert F Kirby. 22. 1810 Bav st. s.e.. and Alice V. Turner- 22. 917 10th st. n.w.; the Rev. W. B. King. Gerald C. Gejrty 29. Minneapolis. Minn,, and Helen M. Geiger. 24. 3730 Cumber land st. n.w.: the Rev. Charles D. Gor man. Berton F Sevmour, 30, Eve-aft Hotel, and Ada G Waters, Si, 115 8th st. s.e.; Judge Rohert E Mattingly George H McAlister, 22. 1337 Oth st. n.w , and Maggie A. Johnson. 22. 011 M st. n.w : the Rev William H. Jernaeln John H. Redd. 04. and Madeline Shackel ford, 43. both of Richmond. Va : the Rev. Horace E Cromer Irving B. Fowler 40. and Marjorie Llnd hloone 40 both of New York City; the Rev Freelev Rohrer William T Estabrook. 29. Cleveland. Ohio: and Kathleen Miller. 24. 1110 Staples si,- n.e.; the Rev. Calvin H. Wingert. Edward F Pettit. 22. 519 Oth st. s.e., and Adele V. Hayhoe. 21. 025 Oth st. s.w.; the Rev. C. A. Musseltpen. One man out of every eight reg istered for the draft in the First World War saw actual service In the United States Army. (THE opinions oj the writers on this page are their own, not necessarily The Star’s. Such opinions are presented in The Star’s effort to give all sides of questions of interest to its readers, although such opinions may be contradictory among themselves and directly opposed to The Star’s. — -- No Cabinet Post for Flynn Roosevelt's New Campaign Manager Denies He Has Any Political Ambitions for Self By WILL P. KENNEDY. President Roosevelt’s personally picked campaign manager—big Ed Flynn of the Bronx—has no inten tion of accepting any cabinet post, has no desire for any place in the “President's political family,” never had political ambitions and hasn’t any now. In this he is unique in the line of “President makers” with in the memory of current politicians. Mr. Flynn has been in Washington for several days, conferring with party leaders preparatory to taking over the job of chairman of the Democratic National Committee, from which his close friend, Jim Farley, is to retire. For some time he has been learning the ropes at the Democratic campaign head quarters in the Bellevue Hbtel. New York. He already is well oriented at the headquarters, where he and Mr. Farley have been closely asso ciated and working together for more than 20 years. Usually a successful manager of a presidential campaign becomes the distributor of party patronage, is adviser in chief to the President, and occupies an important official position in the Capital, where he is readily accessible to party chief tains from all the States. He also makes frequent forays into the States to see that the party organi zation is being well maintained. In recent years the postmaster generalship has been considered the proper office through which the par ty workers are kept content and rewarded for their efforts, as in the case of Mr. Farley. Dr. Work. Will ; Hays, etc. But none of that for him. I says Edward J. Flynn. Time will tell. Financially Independent. “I am just taking over this job because of a very real affection for President Roosevelt, and because I believe in what he is trying to do.” Mr. Flynn says. “I am not trying to make a job for myself—probably j because I don't need it financially,” he added, when his attention was called to how a steady line of his predecessors had been induced to become cabinet members. In his personal affairs Mr. Flynn is well fixed. He is still relatively j young—he will be 49 on September j 22—and is independently wealthy, with a summer estate at Lake Mahapac, N. Y., and a ranch in Nevada. He has a beautiful, auburn haired wife and three children to whom he is devoted. Politics is his favorite hobby, but he doesn't take it home with him. “My wife doesn’t know politics,” he smilingly explains. He has been “helpful” in getting good political appointments for ■ many of his old schoolmates, but he asks nothing for himself. This is the third important post j for which Mr Roosevelt has picked him. When Mr. Roosevelt was Gov- j ernor of New York, he asked Mr. j Flynn to be secretary of the State ; Senate. Since he has been Presi- j dent, he appointed Mr. Flynn as | Federal Government commissioner ! for the New York World's Fair, and now he has designated him as his third-term campaign manager. While Mr. Flynn is not yet ready to discuss campaign plans, he is quite willing to be quoted as saying he is “confident we’ll win." At the | same time, he confesses that he doesn't expect to fill Jim Farley's shoes—either physically or meta phorically. “I'll just do my best,” he says, “and I'll have many good helpers.” No Big Changes Expected. He does not anticipate any im portant changes in the campaign organization, or in the headquarters office force which has been well trained under Mr. Farley and is well known to political leaders all over the country. Mr. Flynn has a pleasant per sonality, wins friends easily and has a strong Farley touch in the gracious way he meets people. But he has a peculiar weakness for a man who has gone so far and been at time's a storm center in public life. He is shy and admits it. He denies he EDWARD J. FLYNN. has any inferiority complex, but he ! sincerely dislikes personal publicity | and is/reticent. Flynn is not, however, meek and yielding, but can be aggressive, stub born and firm. He loves a fight— "that’s the Irish in me, I suppose,” he says. When he makes up his mind to do something, it's pretty hard to dissuade or deter him, his close friends and political co-workers say. He is a real Irishman, although born in the Bronx where he always has lived and still lives. His father came from Ballin Spittle, near Cork, where the family tree has been growing for hundreds of years and is still growing. His father was a graduate of Trinity College, Dublin, and for years was connected with the New York Central Railroad. He himself has visited Ireland many times—15 to 20—"been going across all my life,” he says, "and will be j going back again as soon as the war's over.” Was Track Athlete. He was born September 22. 1891, and attended Fordham College and the Fordham Law School, from which he graduated in 1912 and started practicing law on his own. At Fordham he was a track athlete. He went into the State Legislature 22 years ago, then for four years was sheriff and later city cham berlain under Mayor Jimmy Walker. For 10 years he Was secretary of the State Senate, and for 18 years he has been leader of the Bronx. Thirteen years ago he was mar ried to Miss Helen Margaret Jones. He admits that he thinks his wife “is very beautiful” and that "many other people agree with me.” Their children are Pat. 10; Dick, 9, and Sheila, 5. He and his wife were both christened, confirmed and mar ried in St. Jerome's Church, New York City, and all of their children have been christened there also— quite a record among the shifting population of the metropolis. His summer place is at Lake Mahopac, in Putnam County, where he has a farm of 350 acres and 56 head of blooded Guernsey cattle. There he runs a dairy farm. He also has a cattle ranch of 14,000 acres in Nevada with 3,000 head of cattle. Horseback riding is his favorite sport and he has been riding since he was a small boy. Several years ago his back was so seriously in jured in a fall from a horse that he had to %tay in bed for two months at the lake. He has never known the chal lenge of being “broke” and admits that he “probably missed a lot in that way.” His family always was well to do. He acquired his con siderable fortune partially by in heritance from his parents, partly from his law practice (he is now a member of the Arm of Gold water & Flynn, 60 East Forty second street) and through invest ments. He laughingly denied that he has made any investment in Mr. Farley’s new business enter prise for which he is quitting as Postmaster General on August 31. Nature’s Children Lima Bean By LILLIAN COX ATHEY. We find that of all the pole beans the limas have the greatest economic importance. They are usually grown for profit and are entitled to the popularity showered upon them. There are three types at the present time which lead--the Dreer, small, or Sieva, and the large lima. Each of these has subvarieties or strains and they appear in bush or pole form. The old-fashioned lima bean was a buxom and healthy-sized bean. Somehow it has been losing its popularity of late years and the small, green, tender ones have led. The lima bean has long been called the king of table beans—no matter what size. Of course, since this vegetable must be trained to climb a pole, it does not come cheap. Individual care always costs money. These beans demand especially fertile soil, and it is claimed by those familiar with the temperament of the limas, that you can hardly give them too much rich soil. This means expense again To provide right soil means enrichment of the ground in which the seeds are placed, further food added to the ground during the days when the bean is learning to climb the pole, and again after it is all set to mature its seeds. Beside all this attention, the lima desires warm soil and neighboring poles no closer than 4 feet. Once the lima get* ready to bear pods it keeps at the job regularly. As soon as the matured pods ap pear on the .vine tney should be gathered, so that strength required for the coming one? will not be wasted in maturing the older pods for seed purposes. Toward the last of the lima bean season, if you have found this bean to be all that you desire, then you ma\ permit some of the finest pods tc ripen and be ready for another crop the coming year. Lima beans require a long season. Therefore they are not a vegetable for the colder climates. The bush lima, the Sieva, la the most successful. These do not take the place of the pole lima, as they are not so productive. But they have been found satisfactory where con tinuous bearing is desired and pol^s are found to be out of the question. The foliage of th? various beans does not appeal generally to insects. But the pods, when dry, have too much appeal for the beanweevil, a small cousin of the peaweevil, with the same family habits. The loss to the grower is considerable, and for this reason, all beans used for seed or food must be protected against this foe. Bean blight, a disease that often affects the lima bean in the field, also causes heartache among the growers of this finely flavored and popular vegetable. There are over 100.000 acres of lima beans under cultivation in California alone. The profitably growing of lima beans calls for a specialized education. Guess work here is costly. Plymouth BRAKESRELINEDqub qc Guaranteed 20,000 Miles O M >VV CLIFT'SseSwcl I Duplicate D. C. Teittng Machine 2002 K ST. N.W. MS. 8212 Draft Bill Held Misunderstood 'Selective Service' to Protect America Rather Than 'Compulsory Conscription' Is Called Its Objective By COL. FREDERICK PALMER, Noted Military Expert. Widespread misunderstanding of the Burke-Wadsworth conscrip tion bill prevails. Many people think registration means immediate call to military service. Many who are most alarmed about a fifth column in case of war do not realize that enactment of this bill is the best way to deal with such subversive activities. Let us simplify the spirit, terms and purposes of the bill. We can do so by using the cover page of the report of the hearing before the Senate Military Affairs Committee. The title of it is “Compulsory Mili tary Training and Service.” Compulsory is not a pleasant word to many of us. It denotes con scription, which is a horrid word with a totalitarian sound. Conscription grants the Government the power to draft any man into the Army, and under this bill to draft him in time of peace. There is no denying this fact. It will remain established, if the bill is passed, until the bill is repealed. The subtitle on the cover page calls it “A Bill to Protect the Integrity and Institutions of the United States Through a Svstem of Selective Compulsory Military Service." Reports of the bill’s progress are increas ingly gi^en tj leave out the word “selective” before the word “compulsory.” tt •.BJuti,.flrst consider .“protect the integrity and institutions of the United States." Conscription is accepted too exclusively as limited to military preparedness against armed attack from without. How will it protect us from dangerous forces working from within? Candidates Are Investigated Turn to the requisite qualifications for a private in our Regular Army or a seaman in our Regular Navy today. Passing the educational and physical test is preliminary to further examination. If the candidate is in easy reach of a recruiting station, say in a city, an experienced non COm a2.eiS ^ome and up his record and the company he keeps. ii ui 8 cueck"uP is made by mail through the local postmaster or other reliable sources, if he lives at a distance—on a farm or in a village. No one touched with subversive teachings is wanted. Registration in peace supplies initial information which will not have to be obtained in haste if war comes. Any man with subversive tendencies can be dealt with immediately. He will have to prove that his ciaim to be a conscientious objector is not an excuse for a slacker if it should appear, when his case is studied by the draft experts, that he has just got off on the wrong foot and likely will make a good soldier on the way to become a good-' citizen, if rightly handled, he will be received in the draft army. Association May Well Cure His Grouch He wilf not find he is in a group who shared his warped views. Care is always taken to avoid that error. He will be in the ranks between two normal, right-minded American youths. Association likely will cure him of his grouch just as it did a host of similar examples in the World War draft. He will live a healthy, disciplined life in place of a malcontent, not to say disorderly life. Serving under the flag will insure depths of feeling for it which he could never get by watching it pass in a parade. We cannot stress too much th^ "selective” before the “compulsory” since "selective” is being so frequently omitted; or too much that being registered does not mean you will be called out—an impression common among many people. If all men from 21 to 31, who would be registered, under the terms of the bill as it came from the Senate committee, should be called out we should have 15 to 20 times the 400,000 or 500 000 which it is proposed to draft for the first year. By registration we shall know‘what each man is best fitted to do, whether mechanic or clerk, his present employment and general qualifica tions. This is only the extension for war needs of the personnel system of any corporaton or any employment bureau, seeking to place unemployed or high school or college graduates. Employers do not choose on sight or by lot, but on records. The Army would have records and choose by lot. Registration Might Help F. B. I. In the World War—when we started from scratch—months passed, not only at home, but in the A. E. F., before we got satisfactory allocation of personnel. It was quite human that men wanted to do w’hat they were accustomed to doing and best fitted to do. Under registration in peace we shall be through with all this groundwork when w:ar comes. It will not happen as it did in France in 1917-18 when the service of supply, needing 100 more automobile mechanics, had to hunt for them. It is past understanding to one with experience of war and in the light of what happened in Europe, how any one who favors universal finger printing can object to selective service registration to meet attack from without. This registration might tip off the sleuths of our F. B. I. about potential fifth columnists for the attack from within. Some opponents of selective service who have a weakness for analogies, without looking too closely into premises, point out that the totalitarian dictators conscript all the way from grandchildren to grand parents. They see conscription as the very mother of dictatorships. Not to mention how Lenin paved the way for Stalin in Russia. It was by raising volunteer gangf. black shirt and storm troops that Premier Mus solini became master df Italy, and Chancellor Hitler of Germany. Dicta tors most often rise as the result of national unrest and defeat. In war or peace they come when a people are in the mood to vest all power, as indispensable, in one man. If the British had started conscription in ample tim» before the war they would be in a better position to defend their homeland and their possessions overseas. Australia hesitated long, but now, with her lifeline threatened by Japan’s incursion into East Indian waters and the Italian attempt to control the Gulf of Aden, she is about to adopt a full measure of conscription. (Released by North American Newspaper Alliance, Inc.) Births Reported James end Elizateth Ackman. t,. Leverette and Allie Baker, girl. Ira and Gladys Bechtold. girl. Garland and Margaret Bloom, boy. William and Katherine Brady, boy. Wilfred and Dorothy Callett. gin. Walton and Marian Darwin, boy. Eugene and Thelma Dawson, girl. Edward and Irene Dedwney. girl Robert and Catherine Early, girl. George and Mildred Ellis, girl. William and Katherine Evans, girl Hugh and Elizabeth Francis, girl Charles and Myrtle Garrison, girl William and Droury Harpold. boy. Charles and Eva Hayden, boy George and Marie La May. boy. x Emery and Lillian Lane. boy. Charles and Matilda Larkins, girl John and Sara Malone, boy George and Dorothy Mangum. ei Joseph and Laura Mlchaelle. girl Thomas and Elizabeth Montgom Arthur and Aline Murphy, boy. Joseph and Lillian Nau. boy. Merritt and Marguerite Pearson Riy and Laura Pence, girl. Ralph and Cynthia Pierce, boy. Samuel and Edith Reeder, boy. Edgar and Mabel Saux. girl. Herbert and Lillian Schiefer. gi George and Adele Tacey. boy. Braine and Thelma Wade. iirl. Harold and Louise Watkins, boy. Lewis and Hattie Bariao. boy. Stephen and Rachel Braxton. John and Dorothy Brown, boy George and Marie Burgess, boy. Lawrence and Marie Carberry. t Samuel and Mary Carter, boy. Dajyel and Lillie Chisolm, girl. Richard and Ida Cooper, boy William and Alma Gates, girl. Mathews and Lillian Greene, girl. Joseph and Ida Griffin, boy Clyde and Beatrice Jones, girl. Lawrence and Nancy Jones, boy. Wilbur a.nd Irene Jones boy. Leroy and Lillian Lamont. boy. Carroll and Elizabeth Lenyear. boy. John and Mary Mathis, girl. William and Rosetta Morton, boy. Francis and Beatrice Perry, girl. Frederick and Grace Smith, girl. Edward and Juanita Towell. boy. James and Mollie Walker, girl. Icam and Jeanette Washington, girl. Lenard and Clara Wheeler, boy. Coilis and Bedeiia Willis, boy. Solomon and Etter Worrell, girl. -- Deaths Reported William H. Morse, 94. 3638 Van Ness st. n.w. August J Bommer. 82- Gallinger Hospital. Hettie Atkinson. 82, 1400 Fairmont st. n.w. Cecelia Bassechas. 80. Garfield Hospital. Anne E. Earp. 78. 16 Channing st. n.w Francis G. Richmond. ?6. Emergency Hos pital. Emma Miller. 72. Emergency Hospital. Samuel L. Craft. 72. 2002 C st n.e. George Eckloff. 62. Sibley Hospital. John M. Kearful. 58. I3*a and D sts. n.w Willis B. Gibbs, 51. United States Naval Hospital. Dyer J. Taylor. 49. 1617 21st st. n.w. George Annie. 40. Sibley Hospital. Helen Draper, 30. Doctors’ Hospital. Henry D Lemmond. 28. Social Security Bui’ding. Mary Evans. 85. Home for Aged Jollie Drape. 70. Gallinger Hospital. Charlotte Hewlett. 66, up G st. sw James H. Nelson. 61, St. Elizabeth’s Hos pital. Henry Lewis. 43. GaHinger Hospital Geneva Horton. 28. Freedmen's Hospital. HOME DELIVERY m ASK for CIRCULATION DEPT. The Evening b Sunday Star-75e per month 18. per week The Evening Star..45e per month 10. o«r w..k The Night Final b Sunday Star_85c per month 20. m w««k The Night Final Star—-60c per month 14. per week The Sunday Star___10* per copy )t Cbcning & &unbap &tar The Political Mill Campaign May Be Contest of Rural And City Votes By G. GOULD LINCOLN. The supposedly defunct Pender gast Democratic machine in Kansas City and its allies in St. Louis and outlying parts of the State have G. Gould Lincoln. defeated, by a very narrow margin, Gov. Lloyd C. J'tark in his contest for the Demo cratic senatorial nomination. Not all the credit for Gov. Stark’s defeat goes to the machine. Part goes to Senator Bennett Clark, who broke with Gov. Stark about a year ago, when the Gov ernor became a potential candidate for the Democratic presidential or vice presidential nomination. It was Gov. Stark who took “Tom” (Boss) Pendergast for a ride in a couple of election contests after Stark became Governor. It was Stark who pressed for action to put the Pendergast machine and its boss out of commission in Kansas City. Maurice M. Milligan was United States district attorney in Kansas City. After the onslaught against Pendergast had begun, it fell to Mr. Milligan to prosecute the boss, and to obtain a conviction against him for income tax law violations So Mr. Milligan, worked upon by his own friends and by enemies of Gov. Stark, determined to get into the Democratic senatorial race. Milligan Boom Deflated. Early in the year there wer those who insisted—although tl-' might have known better—that Mi ligan was the man of the hour, a?' that he would defeat both Stark an Senator Truman, who had been ; elected to the Senate six years ago with the support of Pendergast. What happened to Mr. Milligan was rather pathetic. He received about 125,000 votes in the primary last Tuesday to 262,000 for Senator Tru man and 255.000 for Gov. Stark. His only accomplishment was the de feat of Gov. Stark. Stark and the re-election of Senator Truman— with the accompanying joy of the Pendergast machine and probably of the boss himself. For one reason or another, the machine's hate of Gov. Stark was far stronger than any dislike it may have had for the district attorney who won the cases against Pendergast and sent him to jail. Gov. Stark showed himself n uncompromising foe of the machine. He has been accused of having ac cepted the support of Pendergc when he was nominated four year ago and later turning against tin boss. He did have the Penderge i I support, which would have been : placed behind some other Derno | cratic candidate had Stark not been ! the man. But when Pendergast sought to dictate the appointment of key men in the State's govern ment, Gov. Stark promptly told the boss where to head in. Recount May Decide. The vote in the senatorial nomi I nation was so close in Missouri that ’ a recount may be necessary, but on ! the face of the returns. Senator | Truman has a lead of 7,000 votes over Gov. Stark. There remained j yesterday several outlying districts I to be heard from, in the sections of I the State favorable to Stark, and also a large number of absentee ballots to be counted. It is easy to see that if Milligan had not allowed himself to be per suaded to enter this senatorial race, the anti-Pendergast machine voters would have nominated Gov. Stark for Senator. The pleasant Mr. Milligan was forced to resign his office as United States prosecuting attorney when he | became a candidate for the Senate, under the provisions of the Hatch “clean politics" act. It is difficult to see, right off the bat, just how Mr. Milligan has done much for him self. Gov. St-’rk is the kind of man needed American politics. He is a grad;' . j of the United States Naval Academy. He served as an officer of the Army in the A. E. F. in the World War. He has been a successful businessman and a good Governor of Missouri. At one time it was thought the President might appoint him Secretary of the Navy. But Mr. Roosevelt turned to Charles Edison, who was Assistant Secretary of the Navy and is now the Demo cratic nominee for Governor of New Jersey, after leaving the secretary ship vacant for months. And then, after Edison had been "built up" for the gubernatorial campaign, the President picked Col. Frank Knox, Republican publisher of the Chicago Daily News, to be Secretary of the Navy in his effort to give the Gov ernment a semblance of political solidarity. Machines for Roosevelt. It will be unfortunate if Gov. Stark is now retired from public life permanently. The Roosevelt administration has the ardent sup port of the bosses of Democratic machines in a number of big cities in this country. Some of the ma chines have a reputation for cor rupt politics that will not down. It will have the support of the Pendergast machine in Kansas City, just as it has the support of the Keily-Nash machine in Chicago, the Crump machine in Memphis, the Hague machine in Jersey City and the Democratic machine in New York City, which is now dominated by “Ed" Flynn, new chairman of the Democratic National Committee. It looks as though the present campaign may come down to a contest between the city and rural votes. The New Dealers are count ing heavily on rolling up huge votee in the big cities—New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Detroit, Los Angeles, Boston, Cleveland, etc. A Job of the Willkie campaigners is to so reduce the city pluralities rolled up for President Roosevelt that, taken in conjunction with a big rural Republican vote, the G. O. P. nominee may win next No vember. Mr. Willkie is turning over to Thomas E. Dewey the job of showing the connection between the New Dealers and corrupt machine bosses. When Mr. Dewey turns loose on the Kellys, the Hagues, etc., he may be expected to stir the political cauldron with * very considerable spoon. • A.