Newspaper Page Text
Desperate Russian Resistance Slows Up Germany's Formidable Panzer Divisions Review of Ninety-Seventh Week of War By John C. Henry. Feature of last week’s war was the stationary fury of Adolf Hitler’s blitz krieg into Red Russia. Having churned their way rapidly through Baltic and Polish territories in first two weeks of Russ invasion, Nazi divisions seemingly had come to a virtual standstill last week against Stalin Line, main defense frontier of U. S. S. R. Meaaw'hile, French and British finally halted fighting for truce in Syria. Somewhat less intensively, British bombers continued banging at German industrial centers and potential invasion bases. Here, there was surprise announcement that American naval forces had landed in Iceland; controversy over w-hether United States bases were being constructed or planned in North Ireland and Scotland. On Thursday and Friday President Roosevelt asked more than eight billion dollars in Army Navy-maritime supplemental appropriations. On Fighting Fronts Berlin began the past week with its eustomary claims of startling and spec tacular successes, speaking somewhat i specifically of gains in Bucovina and Bessarabia, but less definitely of holes being punched at unnamed points in Stalin Line. Dealing in large figures only, Nazi headquarters listed 485 Soviet planes de stroyed over week end as compared with | 21 Germans downed. It was wonderful, Berlin indicated, with more than 7,000 Russian planes lost in two weeks, 300, 000 prisoners taken, and most “terrible” Red atrocities uncovered in Ukraine. Not to be outfigured. Moscow on Mon day declared German offensive had been stopped along entire 1,100-mile front, with Red counter-attacks under way at five distinct points. In 16 days, Mos cow said, Nazis had lost nearly 1,000.000 men in dead and wounded. In attempting to make choice between contradictory versions, there was one difference favoring that Contradictory from Moscow, namely, Communiques that Russian communi ques named places Where fighting was in progress, while German pronouncements were pointedly vague. This distinction became even more noticeable in Tuesday's communiques as Moscow claimed precise successes along ; 600-mile central front, particularly at bloodied Dnieper and Dnestr River banks. Between these two natural battle lines, * running generally north and south, Nazi Luftwaffe hammered at key city of Zhitomir, but of land action Berlin sources complained only that Red de fenders were using foul tactics of let ting German units pass concealed case mates for purposes of cutting them down in rear, and that other Bolos played dead until unwary invaders were entrapped. It was on Tuesday, too. that first Bal tic Sea engagement of this war was re ported. with Russians claiming destruc tion of two German minelayers and rout ing of Nazi cruiser. Berlin continued evasive on Wednes day, after claiming successes in Estonia and Finland, dismissing rest of struggle by saying, “The fights continue success ful on the entire eastern front.” Moscow claimed a decisive victory in North Russia with two motorized Ger I 1 ' ~ man regiments badly shattered, and re ported Nazi column aimed at Leningrad under heavy artillery fire as its progress was halted. Heaviest fighting, however, was said to be around Polotsk, just ahead of Stalin Line and one of points at which German advance in 1918 halted. South ward. Moscow said German-Rumanian units had been thrown back across River Prut, Bessarabian line. From Axis-friendly Vichy came story of shake-up in Finnish-German-Ruman ian commands as climax of these con tinuing days of Nazi failure to speed its march for Moscow. That this failure is a positive one was reflected further on Thursday when Soviet communique told of Germans smashing German motorized Slowed division between Lepel and Borisov, well outside Stalin Line and athwart most direct route to Moscow. Nowhere did Reds admit re verses and from Berlin came only asserr tions that operations were "progressing relentlessly.’’ Finally acknowledging stories of Nazi failures, German spokes man promised that there would be "an entirely different picture’’ when the Ber lin high command chooses to reveal the facts. But on Friday, D.N B„ official German news agency, conceded that eastward drive had been stalled. As explanation, however, Berlin complained that high ways were clogged by wrecked Russian tanks and vehicles. Returning to big figures, Nazi agency said 191 Soviet planes and 375 trucks had been destroyed in single day, while Luftwaffe pounded again at Zhitomir. Confirming the stall ing, Moscow said entire front was in active except for reciprocal air engage ments. In pointing his main drive along the Borisov-Moscow line, Hitler is following course taken by Napoleon in 1812. Launching his invasion on June 24 of that year, only two days later in season than was chosen by Hitler, French Em peror led 450.000 men into Moscow, but destruction of food supplies left him facing bleak prospects. An unprofitable month in Moscow was followed by deci sion to retreat into Prussia, but blis tering summer had turned to ravaging winter by this time, with disastrous results so well known to historians. Meanwhile, French-British war in ,- -—^“I ^ V MAIN GERMAN nuf BUFFER TERRITORY ORIVES *•$•-',V , :* ACQUIRED RT RUSSIA SsS&S 'O"*'*1 *'«' IN LAST TWO TEARS Rllt*t"UIT OF CERMAN -ADVANCE in 1911 ter tete- ter MARSHES -CANALS ■at ■+ o 100 i.— ■ . - . i ■ste MILES 1 *-* • '-*»4n t • ^ ___ ^ CHEREPOVETS * t A , •m- ^ I UNION OF SOVIET \ • ■ - BOLOGO m I LEVEN MA|OR RAIL I I . - SOCIALIST REPUBLICS S53SB r .'JsTALIN LINE t.x.Ri r . - r VJI 100 r».l«< Horn Bl»k V Summutia. IW.. SSSSSSSSSI I A -TX\/ I A f- v’ sl5** *• c«i» •« f.«i.«r ■~—18S»// -»--A f IA V'. , I A -.' llR.MfUR 75 «.l« Ru? SSSSSSSSSSrlibau I /R »5*=T=i^ * * »»"■« ^ *-ij MUAINIA J,' * •••xrN^Ji^&3SKAUNAs!| ,—' p;*.KQNiGSBERGj:;xj:j:j * 2 0mmr i I^PRUSSiApb/ V i^ 'jO-X-S OGILEV?, r . B ROSLAVI. L'WHITE;,! V<v4 ^ initial nazi pushes RUSSIAN S.S.R. i . ■ A =***■ / , OREL 7 1 &r A* ' bobruisk ? % V Px0>»L A N D{historic berezina ^"^TNgomel #NOVOZYKOV % =*=£=*=* • W^v'Xv.TvXv.V RIVER »k„, N.pairo. ,„i DMITRIEV Syria was climaxed by a truce as British besieged Beirut. Land artilirry and naval batteries played large part as British units, com posed largely of Australians, blasted at coastal city. On Wednesday it was announced that Vichy government had asked ‘'an imme diate silencing of arms’’ and French that American Consul General Fight On at Beirut had been desig nated as intermediary. For two days then there were divergent re ports from London, Beirut and Vichy as to British reaction and true nature of response for plea of peace. It became established on Friday, how ever, that Vichy had balked at British terms—said to include surrender of arms and warships, occupation of Syria by British troops, and implied recognition of De Gaulle Free French movement— and that fighting might continue indefi nitely. French navfl units were reported to have left Beirut during this period to take refuge in Turkish port of Alex andretta, but pressure from Berlin is believed responsible for Vichy delay over armistice and ferrying of French rein forcements to Syria in German transport planes was reported. Active participation of Nazi facilities In this conflict probably would be major influence and might be fatal to British hopes of maintaining defense of Suez area. Truce was hopeful turn, therefore. With main German air strength con centrated on eastern front. British air force continued night and day R. A. F. blasting at industrial cities of Busy Reich and Nazi-held ports from Holland through Bel gium and France. Conflicting claims make it difficult to appraise true results of these forays, but burden of reports indicate that R. A P. inflicted material damage at sev eral key objectives even if cost was high in planes and pilots. Single major retaliatory assault by Nazi flyers was against Southampton, South England port. At sea there was likewise a lull in in tensive warfare, but of headline im portance to Americans was announce ment that six Red Cross nurses were ! believed lost in sinking of British mer chant ship which cleared from Gulf Coast port on June 5. Four other nurses were reported safe. And just to round up reports of fight- j ing throughout this embarrassed world —Japanese sources announced capture of last Chinese coastal port, Wongkong, j and two South American nations. Peru and Ecuador, traded bullets over bound aries. * * * * On Domestic Front Most spectacular of domestic develop ments during week was President Roose velt's announcement on Monday that naval forces that day had been landed in Iceland as part of action to “forestall any pincers movement undertaken by Germany against the Western Hemi sphere." Coupled with this action was sending of substantial forces to Trinidad and British Guiana, Middle Atlantic bases now being maintained by this Government. Eventually, Mr. Roosevelt said. Amer ican forces would replace estimated 80, 000 British troops which have been occupying Iceland for past 15 months. By this step, American Government completed crescent-shaped chain of out posts stretching from U. S. "Tokes" Arctic Circle to Equator Iceland and f°rmin8 line °f de tense for entire Atlantic seaboard of northern half of this hemi sphere. To make this defensive gesture fully effective, United States Fleet was ordered to take all "necessary steps" to maintain communications between bases and continental mainland. Out of Iceland disclosure developed several verbal tempests. First was exchange over fact that Senator Wheeler, Montana Democrat, four days earlier had declared publicly that such a step was planned or under way. London howled that advance dis closure had jeopardized lives. British and American, and Churchill dispatched “ex pression of concern" directly to Roose velt. Following closely, however, was asser tion by Senator Taft. Ohio Republican, that American naval-air bases were planned or under way in North Ireland or Scotland. London answered this, too, by saying that Americans were working for British government on North Ire land project and President affirmed this by pointing to its complete legality. Another storm raged over nature of “necessary steps" which Navy had been ordered to take for keeping sea lanes clear, with Secretary Knox implying in press conference that this would mean shooting. Called before Senate commit tee. Knox denied that shooting already had occurred. Because important phases of Ameri can defense program are ahead of sched ule. President Roosevelt Billions asked Congress on For Defense Thursday and Friday for supplemental appro priations of $4,770,000,000 for Army. *1, 625.000.000 for Navy, and $1,698,000,000 for Maritime Commission. Most of lat ter, it was explained, wall be devoted to construction of 566 new merchant ships, planned for completion by end of 1943. Congressional approval of War De partment recommendation for keeping draftees in service beyond year and for removal of restrictions against sending American troops out of hemisphere was endangered during week by reaction of Speaker Rayburn, although President indicated favor at press conference. It was at this conference, on Tuesday, that Mr. Roosevelt also in effect wiped out hemispherical lines by speaking of de fense points outside this half of the world. On Thursday, House passed bill pro viding for mandatory- deferment from draft of men above 28 years of age. And yoo-hoo heard around the wor!J came from Tennessee when draftee unit whistled at girls in shorts, within hear ing of golfing general, and was punish? by 150-mile extra jaunt, part of It by foot. Indignant House members focussed attention on incident to point where Wt., Department ordered general to mat# j full report. -—— .1 —■ WAR'S LESSON: DEFENSE IS NOT ENOUGH Iceland Occupation Seen Hint U. S. May Move First By Constantine Brown. The occupation of Iceland by United States Marines brings this country di rectly into the zone of operations of the belligerents for the first time since the outbreak of the second World War and is viewed in some quarters as the be ginning of America's offensive against the Axis. There is no doubt that the primary motive which prompted the adminis tration to act was the desire to prevent the Germans from attacking the British force in Iceland and to establish a com paratively safe shipping lane for ships carrying arms and planes to Great Britain. But there is a more impor tant military reason for the physical occupation of the island. The War Plans and Operations Divi sions of the Army and Navy naturally have been studying Hitler’s campaigns with the utmost care, especially the at tack against Russia. There have been many explanations for the collapse of Western European countries under the biows of the Nazi divisions, even though at times the forces opposing Germany were superior numerically. But we have accepted the general theory that the overwhelming number of German air planes and mechanized forces has de feated the foremost European military nations. Attack on Russia a Revelation. The attack on Russia was a revelation. There was a country which, for the last 15 years has been preparing herself militarily on the basis of intense mech anization of forces. Russia was run by a dictator. Hence it did not suffer from parliamentary and public opinion in fluences in the development of her armies. The Russian technicians de cided that the future battles would be fought by steel monsters and airplanes. And they went ahead and constructed as many tanks and airplanes as their fast-growing industry and availability of raw materials permitted them. The Russians were the first to devise the supertank. In fact Germans learned the technique of building those monsters from the Soviets at a time—before Hit ler—when the Reich was not permitted to build either tanks or military air planes or heavy guns. The Russians were the first to de relop the parachute army and the transport airplane which besides carry ing men also was able to carry in the fueelage a light tank with a complete crew. Our observers saw these planes in Siberia dropping tank and crew be hind imaginary enemy lines without actually making a landing. All of these remarkable technical de velopments were originated by the Rus sians, and Hitler merely copied them later. The Russians were certainly not lacking in man power. While in trained troops they could not boast more than 5.000.000 men, the supply of reserves is almost Inexhaustible. Yet the Germans, as soon as they made up their minds that tha TJ. S. S. R. must be put out of action as a military power, succeeded beyond belief. At the time of this writing the fight k kill on. But our military experts —whose opinion is shared by the British general staff—believe that the present Russian government will not be able to prevent the eventual advance of the Ger mans. The complete collapse of the Mos cow government, they feel, is only a mat I ter of weeks. The lesson we have learned from the clash between the two European monsters is simple and important; no nation can hope to defeat a well-organized military nation by remaining on the defensive. If we have decided to preserve our polit ical, social and economic system it is only by attacking the enemy that we can hope to achieve success. Lulled in Feeling of Security. Here again the studies of our military observers are instructive. From data gathered in the last few months it seems clear that if Great Britain and France had taken the bull by the horns and decided to attack the Reich, either in a frontal attack against the Siegfried Line or, what was easier, through "non-bellig erent Italy," at the time when the Reich was heavily engaged in Poland, the whole aspect of the war would have changed. The childish demonstration of the French outside the Maginot Line was too pusil lanimous to worry the Germans. The Axis has defeated its opponents one by one, lulling those left into a feeling of security by assurance that the Reich had no hostile intentions against them. It is the same tune that Herr Hitler is singing now to the United States whenever he has the opportunity of expressing himself for publication in this country. If there had been any real statesman ship in Stalin and Foreign Minister Molo tov or any real understanding of military operations among members of the juve nile Soviet general staff, the U. S. S. R. would not have been invaded today. Stalin and the other Russian leaders kept away from contacts with the Amer ican and British Ambassadors in Moscow. In fact, when Sir Stafford Cripps, Brit ain's Ambassador to the U. S. S. R., want ed to communicate some definite infor mation about the Germans’ plans regard ing Russia and asked to see Premier Molotov, he was received some ten days later by a third assistant secretary. When Sir Stafford expressed his desire to see Molotov personally he was informed that under the present political set-up it would be "unwise and unpolitical” if any of the high-ranking members of the Communist government were to see the representatives of the democratic powers. Stalin Missed Chance. What the American and the British Ambassadors intended to convey to the heads of the Russian government was the necessity—for the safety of the U. S. S. R.—that they attack the Reich when the Axis powers attacked Yugoslavia and Greece. The distance from the Russian air bases to Rumania and to Yugoslavia was not more than 120 and 400 miles, respectively. The Russians had concentrated in the Ukraine no less than 2,000 airplanes, bombers and pur suit machines. They also had an agree ment with Yugoslavia to come to her rescue in the event she was attacked. Had Stalin then launched hia air force against the Germans who fought a short but bitter fight in the Balkans, had they then destroyed the Rumanian airfields and damaged the communications be tween the German bases in Bulgaria and Rumania, the aspect of the war would have changed to the advantage of the democratic states. But Stalin and the young men who are at the head of the Russian armies believed, like the Western European countries, in defense rather than offense. The Russian Foreign Office fell for the sweet songs of Herr von Ribbentrop and discounted all warnings of a Ger man attack against the Soviets. They believed what Ribbentrop was telling them, that the next move of the Nazis would be in the direction of the Suez Canal and North Africa. And since Russia was not attacked, why should she risk the uncertainties of a major war? Hitler had promised Stalin — after Britain was defeated by the impassivity of the other nations—a large slice of Iran to the Persian Gulf and Stalin felt secure. Defensive Blunders Studied. But all these developments ar.d the blunders of the “defensive” advocates in Europe have been carefully studied by our War Plans and Operations Divisions of the Army and Navy. The conclusion is obvious: Desire for power is a poison which can find its remedy only in defeat. From every source of reliable information it is obvi ous that while the Axis (Italy, Germany and Japan) is keeping a reserved policy in regard to the various hostile—but non-military — manifestations of this Government, it intends to transfer the war to the Western Hemisphere as soon as the last danger to the rear—Russia— has been eliminated. Hitler has adopted the slogan of the French statesman of the 17th century, Cardinal Mazarin, who, when taxing the French people out of existence, told those who warned him about internal troubles: “Let them threaten and grumble as long as they are paying.” Hitler is repeating this slogan. He pays little attention to the closing of con sulates, to the Atlantic patrol and to the freezing of German funds. They mean nothing to him now. _ But when the time comes, all these will be taken into account for a final reckoning. The occupation of Iceland is, however, an indication that the United States may decide to beat the Germans to the draw. The island can be made the jumping off point for an expeditionary force. It can be made into an impreg nable naval and air base from which American bombers could start a large scale war of devastation against Ger many and the occupied territories. It can be made into a naval base which might destroy Hitler’s main weapon against Britain —the plane and sub marine blockade. Our owm military men look hopefully to the occupation of the island “for the duration” as an indication that it is this country which will choose to strike first at the time and place chosen by our own military and naval leaden. JOSEF STALIN. By adhering to defensive tactics, he missed a rare chance to strike at the Nazis djiring the Balkan campaign, says Constantine Brown. —A. P. Photo. Tax Program (Continued from Page C-l.) New Dealers contend, upon conditions prevailing in the 19th century when scarcity of capital, lack of man power, the abundance of natural resources and free land and an expanding world trade meant that most of the profits of indus try were immediately reinvested, either to expand existing enterprises or to start new ones. Favor Spending Program. The New Deal theorists favor even in normal times a liberal spending pro gram supported by heavy taxation for current purposes and by borrowing for long-time investments. An expansion of public debt at a rate sufficierft to absorb the Nation’s savings is held to be de sirable. Taxation would be used to finance the spending program, to pro mote a redistribution of wealth and in come and to control the flow of funds through channels necessary to maintain prosperity. Economists of the old school challenge some of the basic assumptions of the New Deal theorists as to the causes of recent economic difficulties, contend that technological developments afford unlimited opportunities for investment if the Government will refrain from needless interference and the imposition of heavy burdens, that the spending policy of the New Deal has failed to pro duce the expected results, that tax pol icies have been a deterrent to business, that the use of taxation to gain social and economic ends is hazardous and inevitably causes new dislocations in the economic structure, and that the theory of a constantly unbalanced budget and expanding debt is unsound and will lead to financial disaster. In the clash of phfleeophlee between RUSSIA'S UKRAINIANS ARE A PROUD PEOPLE Their Treasury of Rich Resources Is Hitler's Goal By Lothrofi Stoddard. Loss of the Ukraine would be a body j blow to Soviet Russia, disrupting its eco nomic life in almost every’ way. Con versely, the conquest of the Ukraine would give Germany access to most of the foodstuffs and mineral products which she so badly needs. That is the immediate issue involved in the titantic battles now raging on Russia's western borders. But behind the campaign itself lies the destiny of a country and a people with a long history and profound aspirations. It is this larger Ukrainian question which eventu ally will come up for solution. This vast region in Southern Russia U generally considered in its economic aspects. Relatively little is said of its history or the character of its inhabit ants. Yet these are factors of great importance which should be included in any basic discussion of the problem. The Ukraine is more than a geographi cal expression. The native population, often called Little Russians, are physi cally and temperamentally distinct from the "Great” Russians to the northward. They have an ancient culture and a language which differs from Great Rus sian as much as Dutch does from German. This Ukrainian stock runs clear across East-Central Europe. Resting on the Black Sea as its southern base, it stretches eastward to the Don River, with scattered outposts still farther to the southeast as far as the Caucasus Mountain wall. Its northern boundary is the belt of swamp and scrub which extends across the mid-Russian plains and separates the open prairies of the south from the forest country of the north. Pride Selves on History and Culture. The Ukrainian stock extends beyond the historic boundaries of Russia well into Southern Poland and even across the Carpathians into Northern Hungary. Taken together, these Ukrainian-speak ing people number about 40.000.000 and inhabit an area of fully 220.000 square miles. That is a territory as large as our New England and Middle Atlantic States, with Ohio thrown in for good measure. The Ukrainians pride themselves on their history and culture. Indeed, they believe themselves to be the truer Rus sian race and culture type, deeming the Muscovite Great Russians a half-Finnish or Mongol blend which has lost many vital characteristics of the parent Rus sian stock. A glance at Russian history lends some arguments for such con tentions. In the early Middle Ages, when the Great Russians were rude colonists wrestling with still ruder Finnish tribes amid the gloom of the vast northern forests, a genuine state was growing up the New Dealers and their critics pos sible conditions following the restora tion of world peace necessarily enter into the discussions. Both groups recog nize that a major responsibility of Con gress is the framing of a system of taxa tion which will not accelerate an in evitable poet-war deflation. on the rich grass lands of the south. This budding state showed the marks of a vigorous young civilization. Its capital. Kiev, situated on the middle reaches of the broad Dnieper River and lying on the immemorial trade-route from the Black Sea to the Baltic, was a city of wealth and importance. It was to Kiev that Christianity and European civilization came from Byzantine Con stantinople. It was from Kiev that light went forth to illumine the somber bar barism of the Great Russian North. During the 10th and 11th centuries the Grand Princedom of Kiev stood in the forefront of European powers. Its close contact with both East and West is shown by the fact that one of its princes married a Byzantine emperor's sister, while another prince took to wife the daughter of Harold, last king of that Saxon England which fell before the onslaught of William the Norman. Ukrainians Hated Polish Rule. Wvainia probably would have con tinued to play a prominent part in Eu ropean history if it had not been over whelmed in the series of Asiatic in vasions which assailed Eastern Europe. For more than 100 years the princes of Kiev battled manfully with those nomad hordes; but in the 13th century came the great Mongol invasion which broke the old Ukrainian state to pieces. Kiev was razed, the wide prairies of South ern Russia were swept bare, and the western section of the Ukrainian folk fell under the political sway of the ris ing kingdom of Poland. Polish rule was hated by the Ukrain ians. The Poles, though Slavs, had received their religion and culture from the Roman West, whereas the Ukrain ians had taken theirs from the Byzan tine East. This religious and cultural gulf cculd never be bridged. The Poles were the ruling class, regarded as op pressors by their Orthodox subjects, who resisted every effort made to Polonize and Catholicize them. Attempting to escape from the Polish yoke, Ukrainian frontiersmen ventured back into the deserted plains, battled with the declin ing power of the Mongol Tartars, and set up the famous Cossack Republic of the Dnieper. Division of Ukraine. Alarmed at this development, Poland tried to conquer the Cossacks. Fight ing desperately against both Poles and Tartars, the Cossacks turned to the czardom of Muscovy which had grown up in North-central Russia with Mos cow as its capital, acknowledging the Czar as overlord in return for promises of self-government. But the Czar broke his promise and made a deal with Po land, dividing the Ukrainian country between them. Thenceforth Russians and Poles mutually tyrannized over their respective spheres, and the lot of the unhappy Ukrainians became, if any thing, worse than before. When Poiand itself fell at the end of the 18th century, Russia seized most of the Ukrainian ter ritories. Only a small part, known as Eastern Oalicia, went to Austria. During the 19th century the Czars did their beet to "Russify” their Ukrain ian subjects. But the forbidden lan guage and culture had a refuge across the frontier in Galicia, and from this haven ideas of resistance to czarist op pression spread through the Russian Ukraine. As relations between the czarist and Hapsburg empires grew tense over Balkan rivalries, the Austrian gov ernment encouraged the ideal of an in dependent Ukraine, just as Russian agents were sowing disloyalty among discontented elements in Austria-Hun gary. Then came the great war which smashed both the czarist and Hapsburg empires, reducing all Eastern Europe to temporary chaos. The Ukrainians tried to plead thair case before the Versailles Conference, but their claims were obscured by the Allied aim of building up a Wong Po land and an enlarged Rumania as bul warks against the new threat of Soviet Russia. So a large block of Ukrain ians was placed under Polish rule, while smaller segments went to Ru mania and Czecho-Slovakia. another Versailles creation. The old Polish - Ukrainian feud was resumed with most unhappy consequences. Became Soviet State. The bulk of the Ukrainians remained under the rule of Moscow, now trans formed into Soviet Russia. Theoretically. Ukrainian prospects looked bright, be cause the Communist regime promised a federation of Soviet Republics, with full regard for the language and culture of each, coupled with a large measure of self-government. This would have satisfied the demands of all Ukrainians except a few extremists dreaming of an Independent Ukrainian state. However, in practice, those Soviet promises proved illusory. Local self-government turned out to be a sham, while ruthless Com munization more than offset cultural tolerance somewhat above the minimum allowed under the Czars. There is cer tainly discontent in the Ukraine today, though the iron censorship of Moscow makes it impossible to say how much, or what proportion is due to nationalistic or economic causes. • What we do know is that the Ukraine is a veritable treasure-house of natural resources. Russians call it their bread basket and sugar bowl. A large propor tion of the wheat, maize, beet sugar, vegetables and fruits in the Soviet Union Is grown In the Ukraine. Equally important Is the Ukraine's mineral wealth. It produces 75 per cent of the coal mined In Soviet Russia, and more than 50 per cent of its iron and steel. Furthermore, since the deposits of coal, iron and manganese ore In th« Ukraine occur close together, they form the natural basis for heavy industry, which has been greatly developed. Large industrial cities dot parts of the Ukraine, while mammoth hydroelectric instal lations supplement coal with waterpower. Furthermore, the Ukraine is the gateway to the Caucasus region lying just east ward, where there are some of the richest and most extensive oil fields in the world. Finally, the ports on the Black Sea handle all the water-borne com merce of Southern Russia and an tt® natural links with th® outer world.