Newspaper Page Text
ffje fining Jto With Sunday Morning Edition. WASHINGTON, D. C Published by The Evening Star Newspaper Company. FRANK 8. NOYES, Chairman of the Board. FLEMING NEWBOLD, President. B. M. McKELWAY, Editor. MAIN OFFICE: 11th St. and Pennsylvania Avo. NEW YORK OFFICE: 110 East 42d St. CHICAGO OFFICE: 433 North Michigan Avo. Delivered by Carrier' Metropolitan Area. Dolly and Sunday Dally Only Sunday Only Monthly —1.20* Monthly -90c 10c per copy Weekly —-30c Weekly -20c 10c per copy • 10c additional when 3 Sundays are in a month. Also 10c additional (or Night Final Edition In those sections where delivery is mcde. Rotes by Mail—Payable in Advance. Anywhere In United States. Evening and Sunday Evening Sunday 1 month — 1.30 1 month — 90c 1 month 60c 6 months— 7.30 6 months — 3.00 6 months 3.00 1 year ...13.00 1 year_10.00 1 year —6.00 Telephone NAtional 3000. Entered at the Post Office, Washington, D., C„ os second-doss mail matter. Member of the Associated Press The Associated Press Is entitled exclusively to the use far republication of all the local news printed In this newspaper, as well as all A. P. news dispatches. Jli SATURDAY, June 26, 1948 The Republican Ticket In selecting Governor Warren of Cali fornia to run with Thomas E. Dewey, the Republicans have named a ticket that is going to be hard to beat. It is ideal from the geographical stand point, which, politically speaking, is an important faqtor. As Governors of New York and California, and as proven vote getters in these largest States of the East and the West, they promise to bring into the Republican column seventy-two elec toral votes from their own bailiwicks. That is more than the entire GOP electoral vote in 1932 and in 1936, and only a little under the totals in 1940 and 1944. But the pulling power of a Dewey-Warren ticket will not be confined to the home States of the candidates, for Governor Dewey received more than 22,000,000 votes throughout the country in 1944, and the selection of Gov ernor Warren can be expected to add ma terially to GOP strength in the doubtful Western States. The appeal of the Republican ticket, however, is by no means limited to a matter of geography, for the candidates are strong in their own right. Governor Dewey’s qualifications were discussed in these columns yesterday. In the East, Governor Warren is less well known, but It is not an exaggeration to say that he prob ably is the best man the convention could have chosen to run with the New Yorker. Four years ago Governor Warren was the Republican keynoter. He told that Chicago assemblage that he did not know why he had been chosen to make the keynote address, but that perhaps It was because he came from “the great, hopeful energetic West.’’ And in the West, he went on to say, “there is little fear of failure and no fear of trying.” Those were not idle words, as the Cali fornian's record as a fighter for compulsory health insurance, more social security, better collective bargaining, etc., will at test. In addition to these things, Governor Warren is a firm and clear-sighted advo cate of the assumption by this country of Its international responsibilities. With his nomination, therefore, the Republican ticket escapes the blight that would have come upon it if the second place had gone to some one whose record is one of ob struction of the foreign policies which Governor Dewey has indorsed and for which Republicans like Senator Vanden berg have been fighting. When President Truman was in Cali fornia he said that Governor Warren really was a Democrat. The Governor would deny that, but there is no reason to dis avow the compliment which the President Intended. When campaign time rolls around the Democrats will have to con centrate their fire on Governor Dewey or on the Republican Congress, for they will not have any ammunition to use against the GOP vice presidential candidate. The 'Killer' Ship The physicists say that every action produees an opposite and equal reaction. The reaction to the development of the torpedo boat and the submarine was the creation of a new type of warship, the destroyer. Late in World War II the Ger mans developed a new type of submarine, a fast, long-range U-boat that could “breathe” under water by means of a snout or “schnorkel.” The reaction to this new undersea threat is the Navy’s new “killer” ship, a speedy cruiserlike vessel especially designed to hunt down and destroy the latest type of submersible. Most of the details about this new anti submarine ship, to be known as the CLK (light cruiser-killer), remain a secret. Enough has been revealed recently, how ever, to indicate that naval experts believe they have found the answer to the schnor kel-equipped submarine. The schnorkel— which is being installed on our latest sub marines—not only enables a ship to travel by diesel propulsion for weeks at a time at periscope depth, but, its Nazi designers believed, would render a U-boat immune to radar detection. The problem of detec tion has been given intensive study. While the progress made in solving this problem has not been disclosed, it is reported that the “killer” ships will be equipped with latest detection devices, including “sonar,” for detecting and locating submarines by sound. The CLKs, two of which are to be built for experimental purposes, also will be armed with new antisubmarine weapons of potent striking power. Rockets un doubtedly will be included, for, during the later phases of the war, rocket-type weapons known as “mousetraps” were in stalled on a number of destroyers and destroyer-escorts. These batteries of missiles, made to explode on contact with a submarine, were projected from the ship in multiple lots, falling in a pattern go as to bracket a large area. Any U-boat in that area was doomed. The first of the “killers” will be named the U. S. S. Norfolk, in honor of Norfolk, Virginia, whose citizens raised $37,000,000 toward ship construction during the war. The ship will cost something less than $30,000,000. If this ship proves capable of / 0 countering the schnorkel menace, it will become the prototype for a fleet of CLKs. What the reaction to this new weapon will be remains for naval scientists of the future to determine. Red Program for Germany The decisions of the Soviet bloc at its meeting in Warsaw are interesting not merely in themselves but also because of the background against which they were formulated. The meeting itself came as a distinct surprise, and there is reason to believe that it was called on short notice. This was, of course, a conference of govern ments, represented by top-level representa tives, including Foreign Minister Molotov of Russia. The eight participants com prise the Soviet Union and all seven of the satellite regimes, from Poland to Al bania, set up under Russian pressure behind its iron curtain. Its pronounce ments, therefore, are official and authori tative. Incidentally, this Warsaw meeting should be sharply distinguished from another con ference, that of the so-called Cominform, which was apparently held in deep secrecy shortly before the Warsaw meeting. The Cominform is an organization, not of gov ernments but of Communist parties in various countries, including those of France and Italy, and is concerned primarily with furthering the Communist cause on a world-wide basis. Naturally, whatever decisions were taken' by the Cominform conference form part of Moscow’s grand strategy, international communism being under Soviet direction and control. They thus mesh in with the decisions of the Warsaw meeting, which had a more con crete and restricted objective. That objective is Germany, and the con crete decisions taken may be considered as tactical rather than strategic in char acter. Moscow’s strategy in Germany has long been obvious. It is the establishment of a Communist-dominated regime cover ing the whole of Germany, nominally in dependent, but actually another satellite of the Soviet bloc. There is nothing in the five-point program for Germany which indicates any change in Moscow’s strategic objective. The actions of the Western Powers are denounced as illegal and in jurious, and the speedy setting up of an all-German provisional government is proposed as the preliminary to a definitive peace settlement, with evacuation of all occupation forces. That is Moscow’s familiar propaganda line. However, two points should be noted. Contrary to expectations in the West, the Warsaw program does not provide for the setting up of a regime in Eastern Germany as an answer to that provided for under the London agreement in the three west ern zones. This, of course, will give the Communists an effective talking point that it Is the Western Powers who have split Germany, whereas Russia is solicitous for German unity. The second noteworthy point is that there is no mention in the program of Germany’s eventual frontiers. It should be remembered that the conference was held in Warsaw, and there can be no doubt that the Polish government would like to have had specific assurance that there would be no revision of the former German provinces assigned to Poland by Moscow’s unilateral action. This omission presumably is another Russian bait for German national feeling, whether or not the implied hopes that may be raised are valid or spurious. As for the program itself, it can clearly form no basis for any negotiations between Russia and the Western Powers. It is just another major move in the diplomatic struggle going on over Germany, and its significance will doubtless be pointed up by what takes place in Berlin during the near future. Hail and Farewell to a Champ Joe Louis, avowedly retiring after his twenty-fifth defense of the heavyweight prize fight championship, leaves behind him a record of which he has every reason to be proud. Last night’s contest at Yankee Stadium, though slow-moving, left no room for doubt that the Brown Bomber is still the champ—perhaps the outstanding fighter of all time. But even Joe himself admitted after it was over that he is not the agile, deadly puncher that he used to be. The listlessness of Louis and his prancing opponent, Jersey Joe Walcott, made the first ten rounds look like a second-rate preliminary. It took the prodding of the referee to pro duce the climactic flurry of blows which dropped the challenger for the final count. It is understandable, therefore, that Joe Louis should have announced through the microphone that he had fought his last fight. He retires a champion in more ways than one. Prize fighting has not always been blessed with such able and clean fighters as Louis. There are many pres sures and temptations which only the strong can resist. But Louis resisted them. Sticking to fighting, he refused to be exploited by propagandists of a number of questionable causes. He climbs out of the prize ring (if his decision is indeed irrevo cable) a great fighter, a fine sportsman and a good citizen—a real credit to sport dom, to his country and to his race. The U. N. Loan Despite some suggestions to the con trary, it seems highly unlikely that the United Nations will remove its headquar ters from this gauntry because' Congress failed to authorize the U. N. building loan ’in the last-minute rush before adjourn ment. After all, the failure is attributable pri marily to a House leadership that dilly dallied too long in bringing the measure to a vote. Unanimously indorsed by the House Foreign Affairs Committee and ap proved by the Senate, the proposal has enjoyed overwhelming support in Con gress, and the United Nations would be making little sense if it decided to build its home abroad simply because of a temporary delay in action on authorizing the necessary funds. Nevertheless, besides creating an unfor tunate psychological impression in some quarters, the delay has left the whole project up in the air and created a number of difficulties for the architects, excavators, builders, contractors and others involved. U. N. Secretary General Trygve Lie is understandably disappointed and a bit worried. So, too, is New York City, which 4 has pledged $20,000,000 for site improve ments and which is anxious to get on with the job. As in all undertakings of this sort, financial uncertainty and loss of time add up to a costly headache for everybody involved. Under the bill which Congress failed to pass in time, the Reconstruction Finance Corporation would have been empowered to advance $25,000,000 immediately to the United Nations, with an additional $40, 000,000 to be appropriated as the work proceeded and the bills came due. Unless some way can be found to make the $25,000,000 available in the weeks ahead, construction of the New York headquarters will be held up for a year or two—an altogether unwarranted delay. It has been suggested that Congress ought to be called into special session to deal with the situation, but that seems improbable. Another suggestion is that the World Bank may be able to make the initial advance. If the bank has the legal power to do so, it can meet the immediate problem. In any event, all such possibili ties should be explored in the hope of finding a satisfactory stop-gap solution pending congressional authorization. Is There a Hiding Place? The Encyopedia Britannica people are putting out a movie called “Where Will You Hide?” This question arises from the threat of atomic warfare. The film is designed to show “what will happen in another war when atomic bombs, bacterio logical warfare or still-unpublicized weap ons of mass destruction rain down on our cities.” As if in response to the movie’s question, an Army Map Service expert has just announced that the Nation’s many natural caves would be of little value in such a grim emergency. Reports as to the feasi bility of using caves for shelter in an atomic war are “greatly exaggerated,” ac cording to William E. Davies, a nationally known expert on caves, who has studied the problem for the Army. A false idea as to the availability of caves for human habitation has grown up as a result of public inspection of certain well-known caverns, mostly of a commer cialized nature, said Mr. Davies. Some of these holes in the ground may be usable for storage of important records, military supplies, scientific apparatus and other material. But most caverns are not only inaccessible in an emergency but not fitted to live in for more than a short time. They are damp, muddy, poorly ventilated and full of hazards, from vertical drops of several hundred feet to falling rocks. From this pessimistic report it would seem that the only underground refuge that might prove effective against radia tion or germs would be one specifically designed and constructed for that purpose. To provide sufficient space underground in or near every city and town to protect the inhabitants from destruction obviously would be an engineering job too enormous to undertake. And even if the money could be found to dig these extensive bomb shelters, there is no certainty that they would ever prove their worth. If the bombs should start falling, there will prob ably be little or no advance warning. Our hope of salvation must lie either in some yet-to-be-devised system of guar anteeing the world against atomic war fare, or failing that, in an effective defense ring to break up any attack. Hiding our heads underground, physically or psycho logically, is not the answer. This and That By Charles E. Tracewell A correspondent wants to know about tha yellow-breasted chat. “We find him as ubiquitous, noisy, gay and inquisitive as a jay,” she writes. This is a bird often seen in and around the city, especially In the suburb*, where his chatter attracts attention. The name, of course, comes from just that— chatter. Hence chat, and no bird more deserves his common name. Gaily he calls, looking down the while to see if any one notice* him. * * * * This one is 7% inches long, which is larg* for a warbler. He seems to have a real sense of humor. In this he always is likened to the blue Jay, but is unlike him in that his fun is purely personal. The Jay likes to laugh at others, Including man, cat and dog, as well as bird. The chat makes a joke about himself, and tells it to all who will listen. Perhaps this is not going too far: the chat actually gives one that feeling. * * * * A peculiar bird, is this yellow-breasted chat. He knows a thing or two, though, as humor ous things usually do. For instance, when the parasitic cowbird puts an egg in his nest, he destroys it. In this he is one of the few species that seem to know the difference between rightful babies and usurpers of the nest. There is a long-tailed chat, but he is not seen hereabout. * * * * The chat nest is put, usually, in a tangle of shrubbery. It is made of leaves, strips of bark and weed stalks, lined with fine grasses. The eggs are three to five, white, tinted with pink, spotted with chestnut. The pink tinge is seen only when the egga first are laid. This bird winters in Florida and to the South as far as Yucatan and Costa Rica. In summer he has been found as far North as Maine, but only as a casual visitor. «■ * * * Although classed as a warbler, the chat really is quite un-warbler-like in appearance, song and actions. Therefore those trying to identify him should not think “warbler” too much or they will miss him entirely. The size, heavy bfil and very loud voice set it apart. Some regard it as one of the hardest to see and the easiest to hear. The song usually comes as the creature hops around in the top of a tree or in shrubbery. He also has a flight song, given as he flies high, and then descends with dangling feet. * * * * Some listeners feel that the bird never sings, but Just gives forth with an odd mixture of whistles, squeaks, cackles, etc. It is this "chatting” type of sound, reminding one of the talk back and forward between two excited ladies, that gives the bird his common name. ^ Victor Herbert wrote “Badinage,’ always a favorite: the music somehow reminds one of the sort of thing the chat achieves in the vocal This is a fine bird, one to be taken lightly per haps, but none the less pleasantly for all that. He belongs to the comparatively small group of birds regarded as humorous. It may be that no bird has a real sense of humor, even when it seems to have; the apparent fun in its dis position is just the interpretation humans put on what it does and says. But when we watch the crow, the jay and the chat, we feel that there is something different there, and perhaps "humorous” is Just as good a label as any. t Letters to The Star i Supports Supreme Court View To the Editor of The SUr: The Star persists in treating the Supreme Court’s recent decision on religious Instruc tion in the public schools as an "attack on religion.” When the decision first was an nounced, The Star’s able cartoonist portrayed the court as having decided in favor of athe ism and against religion. The gross miscon ception of the cartoon now is repeated, sur prisingly enough, by the more pretentious, but equally fallacious, editorial reprinted from the American Bar Association Journal. To suggest that the court was choosing be tween atheism and religion is a gratuitous in sult to the eight justices who Joined in the court’s decision, and to the seven major na tional religious denominations which inter vened in the case and asked the court to ban the Champaign system. It seems clear to me that, far from aiding atheism, tHe decision has strengthened the integrity of free religion as well as the integrity of free public education. As the court said, "Both religion and govern ment can best work to achieve their lofty aims if each is left free from the other within its respective sphere.” It is astonishing to find the story of the four Immortal chaplains—Jewish, Protestant and Catholic—who went down together on the S. S. Dorchester, used as an argument against the court. Is it seriously suggested that the moral of this sublime act of heroism and faith is that public school systems should include religious instruction that inevitably emphasizes creedal differences and embroils the govern ment, however innocently, in those religious conflicts which too frequently have erupted and stained the pages of history? Is it not truer to say that the moral of the Dorchester is that the public school system must keep divi sive forces out of the schools—that the schools must insure that the basic unities among our people remain stronger than our creedal di versities so that in times of national crisis we act as united Americans and not as divided sectarians? Principle of Separation Stressed. Hie issue in the Champaign case was not whether the Government may foster religion as an element in the general welfare; in many substantial and significant ways Federal, State and local governments foster religion. The .issue in the Champaign case was whether Gov ernment, in its desire to promote religion, can employ the public school systems to the extent of having the tax-supported public school buildings used for the dissemination of reli gious doctrines. The court, as was its clear duty under the principle of separation oi church and State, said it could not. The public school system, as a specially vital organ of our Government, as a shield and symbol of our democracy, has played a decisive part in the development of the American con cept of separation of church and State. As the court’s opinion shows, by the year 1875 the principle of separation of public education from church entanglements was firmly estab lished in the consciousness of the Nation. By that time, the prohibition of the commingling of religious and sectarian instruction in the public schools was the unchallenged rule. It is the released time programs which are a com paratively new innovation in our public school system. Does any one seriously suggest that during the long period of American history when the principle of separation was unchal lenged in our public school system that religion suffered? True, there is a problem of irreligion in contemporary life. But the answer to that problem is not more sectarianism in the pub lic schools, but more religion in the churches, the synagogues and the homes—in the places which have traditionally been the soil of true, free religion. What the school can offer as a valid contribution to religion—consistent with the schools’ basic purpose to educate America’s children for democracy in an atmos phere free from sectarian pressure—is to pro mote understanding between religious groups and respect for the basic ethical truths com mon to all the great religions. This the schools already do in some measure; there are few subjects in the elementary school curricula which are not shaped and guided by our basic religious concepts. Churches and Synagogues’ Duty. As an old Sunday school superintendent who still is vitally interested in its program, I can testify that our Sunday schools have failed to exploit their possibilities to inculcate religion. Much can be done in adapting modern school methods and pedagogy to the needs of religious instruction in the Sunday school. This is the responsibility of the churches and the synagogues. I hope they will prepare to meet that challenge without asking the public school system to shoulder their private burdens. We know ^rom the studies made by the United States Office of Education that about half of the communities which have tried it have given up the released time plan because it Just didn’t work from the standpoint of the schools or the churches. As a practical mat ter, it is questionable whether released time programs can solve the problem of irreligion. In the public school system the overriding objective must be to train Americans. In our public schools the child should be primarily an American among Americans, who are un shakably devoted to the basic unities of the American way of life. Divisive forces must be kept out of the public school if it is to be come the "symbol of our democracy and mo6t pervasive means for promoting our common destiny.” The Supreme Court, true to its con stitutional obligations, has preserved the unity and integrity of our schools as the foundation of American democracy. They have helped to keep the American public schools the hest in the world. PAUL RICHMAN. National Representative, Anti-Defamation League of B’nal B’rith. Help for Embattled China To the Editor ol The Star: In his column last Sunday, Constantine Brown again showed himself to be one of the ablest political columnists in the Nation’s Capital. His revelations of the manner in which the Truman administration conspired to prevent aid to China are amazing. It was generally known that Secretary Marshall sought to satis fy his personal pique over his failure in China by opposing any move that would support Chiang Kai-shek’s government against the Communists. It, however, was reasonable to expect that he would put aside his ego in the interest of his country. It is a sorry situation when the government of a great and respected nation permits its most vital foreign-policy link to be determined by the personal dislikes and prejudices of its foreign policy makers. It is particularly surprising that Secretary Royall should have taken part in the shameful betrayal of the valiant Chinese armies who have been fighting our common enemies, the Japanese and the Communists, for more than a decade. When Mr. Royall testified in execu tive session that China inevitably would be taken over by the Communists, he was acting not only aa a defeatist but as an amateur prognosticator the like of which we had many during the last world war. The defeatists then predicted the “inevitable collapse of China un der the blows of the Japanese Army,” yet we know today thgt the ability of the Chinese to tie up vast numbers of Japanese troops was the greatest outside contribution to our final victory. Despite all the double talk from the Whit# House and the 6tat# Department, on% thing a > Letters for publication must bear the signature and address of the writer, although it is permissible for a writer known to The Star to use a nom de plume. Please be brief. stands out clearly: Until the Soviet Union has secured its Asiatic flank by knocking the Chinese Republic out of the fight against communism, the Red Army will not be in position to move elsewhere. As long as China can maintain herself in the anti-Communlst battle line, Soviet Russia will have a 3,000 mlle-long exposed "underbelly’' in Asia, vul nerable to bomber attacks and to Invasion in the event of a war with the United States. It, therefore, is obvious that it is to the best Interests of the United States to keep the mil lions of hardy Chinese in the battle and to see to it that they are not beaten. This can be done by means of a comparatively small flow of military supplies. Centuries of priva tion have taught the Chinese people to do big jobs with little assistance. The cost would be only a fraction of the billions we poured into Soviet Russia during the past seven years. Our aid to China need only be a fraction of the money which the present administration proposes to throw into Europe to bolster pseudo-socialist regimes that would collapse at the first roar from the Soviet bear. PAUL D. HAMMACHER. Capital Transit Salaries To the Editor of The Star: I notice the Capital Transit Co. is asking a raise in fare, intimating that fares in other towns are higher. This is not so as in most towns fares are lower, also rides are longer. Very few are as high as here. If the Capital Transit is losing, why the huge salaries they pay their top men? E. D. C. Three Temples in Jerusalem To the Editor of The Star: In The Star of June 15, the Haskln Service replied with the following statement to an inquiry regarding the Wailing Wall in Jeru salem: “When Solomon’s Temple fell into the hands of the Moslems, this fragment of the old wall marked the nearest approach that the Jews could make to the holy site.” But Solomon’s Temple never fell into the hands of the Moslems. Built about 1,000 years before Christ, it was destroyed during the Babylonian conquest of Palestine, about 400 years later. It was rebuilt at the end of the Babylonian captivity, about 500 B.C. Then, about 20 B.C., this second temple was de molished and its reconstruction begun by Herod the Great, called King of the Jews, though actually he ruled as a vassal of Rome, his position having been confirmed by Mark Anthony. Herod had a mania for building, and embellished many cities of Palestine with baths and theaters. He even constructed whole towns. The Jews were reluctant to have Herod raze their Temple, fearing that he might neglect to rebuild it, for he was unscrupulous and ruthless. It was he who tried to kill the infant Christ. He murdered his beautiful wife, Mari amne, and is said to have executed the entire Jewish Sanhedrin merely because, as the Jewish national assembly, it had presumed to criticize some of his acts. The Wonder of Herod’s Making. Herod's Temple was one of the architectural wonders of the ancient world, and one of the most astonishing buildings of all time. In size and splendor it far surpassed Solomon’s Temple. Towering above the buildings of ancient Jerusalem, it looked (according to Josephus, a contemporary Jewish historian) like a snow covered mountain, since such parts as were not gilded were of white marble. The sun reflected from its gold-covered surfaces is said almost to have blinded the beholder. We read of doors 40 feet high and half as wide, covered, together with their Jambs and lintels, not with gold-leaf (though its use was then common), but with heavy plates of gold. That is not incredible, since the Romans are said to have used $25,000,000 worth of the precious metal (as much as our Capitol has cost since it was begun) to gild their temple of Jupiter Capi tolinus, otherwise known as the Capitolium or Capitol. But the most remarkable part of Herod's Temple was the vast court in which the actual building stood. Herod had more than doubled the original area of the Temple site by filling in and walling up part of a valley, thereby creating space for a court 1,200 feet long by 1,000 feet wide. This court, paved with slabs of marble, was surrounded by a stoa, or covered passage, usually known as the porch, which was nearly a mile in length. On three sides of the court, this porch was composed of three rows of columns. On the south side, where it was known as the Royal Porch, there were, accord ing to Josephus, 162 columns in four parallel rows. There must have been at least 500 of these columns, and all of them were in the Corinthian style, with which we are familiar in our Capitol and Supreme Court buildings. Each of them is said tq have been carved from a single piece of white marble, and to have been of such circumference that three men holding hands could Just reach around it at its base. Endured Only a Single Decade. Strange as It may seem, though the ruin* of many much older pagan temples still exist, not even the smallest fragment of the architectural details of Herod’s marvelous Temple appear* thus far to have been discovered, though a portion of Its foundations probably forms the present Wailing Wall. Requiring 80 year* to finish, and built to endure for ages, it stood for barely 10 years after Its completion and eventually disappeared entirely. In AD. 70, following a siege In which more than a million Jews are said to have perished, Herod’s Temple (the third Jewish Temple) was destroyed by the angry soldiers of the Roman General (later Emperor) Titus, who was unable to restrain them. Carved reliefs representing the Seven Golden Candlesticks and other sacred objects which these soldiers carried off from Herod’s Temple, still may be seen on the Triumphal Arch of Titus In Rome. Under that arch no orthodox Jew may pass, since It 1* the outstanding symbol of the humiliation of his people. Perhaps it was the pride inspired In them by their magnificent Temple (which in size and splendor certainly exceeded any pagan temple) that led the Jews Into their tragic war with the Romans—a war whose echoes have not died out after nearly 2,000 years. But the Jews were not yet entirely conquered, nor was Jerusalem yet totally destroyed. How ever, In the year 132, as the result of an up rising under Bar Kochba, Its ruin was com pleted. A Roman city known as Aelia Capitolina subsequently was built cm its site, which was further desecrated by the erection of many pagan temples. A temple to Jupiter Capltolinu*, the patron deity of ancient Rome, profaned the Temple area. No Jew was permitted to enter this Roman city, though entry was not for bidden to the Christians. It is therefore evident that no Jewish Temple fell Into the hands of the Mohammedan conquerors. The Mosque of Omar (symbolizing a religion that Is not Jewish, Christian or pagan) now stand* on the Temple slte. CHARLES H. PROBERT. Convention Parade* Questioned To the Editor of The 8t»r: Do we really want to continue the custom of the “spontaneous,” carefully planned parades at our national conventions? A convention has serious work to do. DELCEVARE KINO. I The Political Mill Warren's Choice Seen Strengthening Ticket Assures G. O. P. Coast Victory | Good Friend of Dewey By Gould Lincoln PHILADELPHIA. June 34.—The $44 ques tion to be decided by the Republican Na tional Committee, after it had become appar ent that Gov. Dewey of New York would head the national ticket, was who would be the Tice presidential nominee. Harold E. Stassen of Minnesota had said he would not accept second place with Got. Dewey. Got. Warren of California had said he was not "interested" in becoming Vice President. Senator Bricker of Ohio, who was Gov. Dewey’s running mate in 1944; House Majority Leader Halleck of Indiana and Gov. Green of Illinois all were available. Despite various reports. Gov. Dewey never made any commitment to any one regarding the vice presidential nomination. So it was with a clean slate that'the new presidential nominee sqt In conference with Republican leaders from all sections of the country far into the night and until the small hours of the morning following his own nomination to consider this question from all angles. Warren Admirable Choice. Primarily the issue was to pick a running mate for Gov. Dewey who would strengthen the ticket, although it was more Important still to find a man fit to be Chief Executive should anything untoward happen to the President, in the event of Gov. Dewey’s elec tion. In addition, Gov. Dewey and his con ferees had to decide whether it was better to reward one of his supporters for the presi dential nomination (a natural thing to do) or to help cement the party by taking for Vice President one of those who had been an opponent. It was a difficult choice to make. Gov. War ren’s acceptance was an answer to prayer. He is Governor of the great State of the Pacific Coast as Gov. Dewey is Governor of the Empire State on the Atlantic. Gov. Warren had wrested political control of California from the Democrats, winning by a large margin while Franklin D. Roosevelt was still in the White House. Gov. Dewey had won a similar battle in New York. Both are serving their second terms. A Dewey-Warren ticket is from every angle admirable. Gov. Warren’s nomi nation assures Republican victory on the West Coast. Gov. Dewey in the East and Midwest is strong as horse radish. When Gov. Warren said he was "not inter ested" in a vice presidential nomination he was a candidate for President. When that issue no longer confronted him, it was a different Warren. Further, he was persuaded that he could be of real service to the Republican Party and to the country if he would accept. Stassen Could Have Accepted. Oov. Dewey and his conferees were con fronted with a situation, before Warren ac cepted. Harold Stassen, who had been goaded Into saying last year he would not run for Vice President with Oov. Dewey, had to make such a statement to convince people he was a real candidate for the presidential nomination and not just shadow boxing. But when the presi dential nomination had been settled, he, too, was In a position where he could say “yes’* without doing violence to his former stand. Mr. Stassen had proved himself widely popu lar with millions of young people and Indepen dent voters. His following Is almost as fanati cal as was that of Franklin D. Roosevelt. And Mr. Stassen’s friends put all the pressure they could bring to bear on Gov. Dewey and the conferees to get back of the Minnesotan for the vice presidential nomination. Gov. War ren’s acceptance relieved that situation. Un doubtedly a Dewey-Stassen ticket would have been tremendously strong with the voters, too. Dewey, Warren Good Friends. Gov. Warren, unlike Mr. Stassen, had never entered a coalition at the convention to “stop” Gov. Dewey. He was not out to “stop” any one, but to get the nomination himself If that were possible. Further, he and Gov. Dewey have been good friends, and have kept In touch with one another constantly, (m problems effecting State government. If Gov. Warren could not have the presidential nomination he preferred Gov. Dewey to either Mr. Stassen or Senator Taft of Ohio. Outside of Senator Martin of Pennsylvania, no one did more real service for the Dewey cause at the national convention than House Leader Halleck, who lined up Indiana’s 39 delegates and threw them Into Oov. Dewey’s column at a crucial moment—and kept them there. The nomination for Vice President was due him. His failure to get It was one of the fortunes of politics, which are sometimes hard to take. Questions and Answers A reader can set the anawar to anr aueetloo «f fact hr writlna The Brenln* Star Information Bureau. 81 8 Ere atreet H E.. Washington 2. D. C. Please Inclose three (3) cents for return posters. By THE HASKIN SERVICE. Q. How do national forests differ from national parks?—N. N. A. National parks are Federal game sanctu aries and wildlife must be protected. No hunt ing Is permitted and natural features may not be disturbed. Unlike national parks the national forests permit hunting and fishing subject to local laws. The privilege of cutting trees Is leased to Individuals under the guid ance of authorized forest rangers and suitable areas are rented to stock grazers. q Were there any Indians In the United States Army In World War I?—C. McC. ‘ A. The majority of Indians as noncitizens were not subject to the draft, but about 8,000 saw military service In 1917-8. The Indians proved to be particularly valuable In the In telligence services, in sniping and raiding be yond enemy lines. Indian languages provided a secret code which completely baffled the Germans. q. in what language does Sholem Asch write?—B. H. A. The author has written nearly all his novels, plays and poems In Yiddish. Though he speaks English fluently and has occasionally written In It, Sholem Asch remains essentially a Yiddish writer whose works appear in trans lation. Q. Does the direction In which rows of plants are laid out have any effect on their growth? —L. J. E. A. In small flower gardens and In the case of crops of varying heights, planting In north south rather than in east-west rows result In more symmetrical development, for both sides of the plant are equally exposed to sunshine and there is more protection from the heat of the midday sun. q What is a pulp magazine?—N. N. C. A.’ A pulp magazine Is one that Is printed on paper from pulpwood, similar to newsprint. Such magazines specialise In fast-moving fic tion, chiefly detective, western or wmance. Kingdom of the Arts A hundred empires that have thrust ~ Dome and turret, now are dust: Their glories unremembered, gone Into’unmounted oblivion. While time, with rich investiture Has set art, music and literature In lasting kingdom that shall stand. Its white towers linking . . . land . . . and land. ___ , KATHERINE EDELMAJT. i