Search America's historic newspaper pages from 1756-1963 or use the U.S. Newspaper Directory to find information about American newspapers published between 1690-present. Chronicling America is sponsored jointly by the National Endowment for the Humanities external link and the Library of Congress. Learn more
Image provided by: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library, Urbana, IL
Newspaper Page Text
ed shrewdly on the precedent at Los Angeles to discredit the pro test of the strikers. One man foresaw the possibil ity of proving criminal conspir acy Joseph C. Pelletier, district attorney of Suffolk county, Mass., then seeking the Demo cratic nomination for governor. In the heat of a preliminary campaign, while assailing the machine candidate a very rich manufacturer Dist, Atty. Pelle tier indicted William M. Wood. Now that political opportunity has passed, will the district attor new of Suffolk county prpse cute really prosecute. Five months ago the grand jury voted indictment. On Feb ruary 2, 1913, Seth Low, former mayor of New York, publicly de manded that William M. Wood, et al., be tried without further de lay. And then and not till then was the date of trial set for March. Now is there to be a real trial an Indianapolis trial? Joseph C. Pellitier, who alone can make it one and upon whom are the eyes of the entire nation has always proved himself, as I see it, an adept at legal soph istry. Why was the famous Cracker will case, in which convictions for jury fixing would have jailed several of the wealthiest men in Boston, "nolle prossed" thrown out of court without trial? Who will answer me this question? Why have the now five-year-old city of Boston "coal steal" cases in which leading politicians. were notoriously implicated, never been brought to trial? And next what will happen to the Wood case? BY SAMUEL GOMPERS The people of the United States demand that William M. Wood, head of the great, overbearing wool trust ,now charged with be ing involved in a dynamite con spiracy, be treated in exactly the same manner that any other pris oner, charged with a similar of fense, be treated. This whether that prisoner be drawn from the ranks of capital or from the ranks of labor. It is high time that Wood be brought to trial. If he is guilty of the crime with which he is charged he should receive his deserts without delay; if he is in nocent he ought to be afforded an immediate chance to clear his name. The manner in which this case has been handled is in striking contrast with the manner in which cases against workingmen are handled. The McNamaras, when they were only suspects, were kid naped and rushed to Los Angeles. William M. Wood and the men charged jointly with him of a conspiracy against the working men of Lawrence have remained at Liberty and have not even been hauled as yet before a bar of jus tice ! If William Wood, backed by a great, grinding money power actually tried to discredit poor, unprotected working men by