Search America's historic newspaper pages from 1777-1963 or use the U.S. Newspaper Directory to find information about American newspapers published between 1690-present. Chronicling America is sponsored jointly by the National Endowment for the Humanities external link and the Library of Congress. Learn more
Image provided by: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library, Urbana, IL
Newspaper Page Text
MEXICAN PRISONER OF WAR SWIMS FOR LIFE FROM MAN-EATING SHARK STORY INSIDE THE DAY BOOK An Adless Daily Newspaper. & N. D. Cochran, ssgggssv. 500 South Peoria St. Editor and Publisher. TSI1 398 Tel. Monroe 353. VOL. 2, NO. 239 Chicago, Wednesday, July 9, 1913- ONE CENT DEPARTMENT STORE OWNERS MADE TO SEEM PERJURERS BY TRIBUNE But They're Not Bless Your Heart! They Never "Opposed" Unions They Just Hate 'Em So Bad It Makes 'Em Bilious. Henry M. Hyde, who writes ar ticles for the Tribune with one hand and runs a farm in Virginia with the other, stated in the Tribune yester day that "the State Street depart ment stores are opposed to the form ation of unions among their em ployes." Now, since Henry M. Hyde, here tofore has spoken with u tongue of brass, in the name of the business men, this statement, coming from him, was indeed interesting. There was a time when The Day Book itself was fully convinced that "the State Street department stores are opposed to the formation of un ions among their employes." But that, of course, was before the high-minded multi-millionaires who own the State Street depart ment stores took the stand and swore before God that they did not and never had opposed the formation of .unions among their employes. It would hardly be meet for any one, without definite proof, of course, to believe that such honorable gen tlemen of business as Dapper Jimmie Simpson of Marshall Field & Co., Joe Basch of Siegel Cooper & Co., Ed Lehmann of The Fair or -John T. Pirie of Carson, Pirie, Scott & Co. had perjured themselves. Such indeed, is almost impossible of belief. Surely such honorable gen tlemen as these would not perjure themselves before a commission in the name of the people over such a .simple little matter as this. Wherefore, was Henry M. Hyde's article in the Tribune so highly in teresting, especially since Hyde al ways heretofore has spoken by, with and from th)e business, and the Trib une is so business-like a newspaper. So a reporter for The Day Book,