Newspaper Page Text
4?& StV-f "viirri HT - ' jrf?"Ar'C'Vi' H' VfffcV--, J1-' 'HflrW J - y-"- c " THE ST. LOUIS REPUBLIC. 1 IB C Loots. Oa) Cent. i K 1 M, W i I I V I NINETYTHIRD YEAR. DE LIMA AND DOWNES CASES DISTINGUISHED How the Two Must Be Separated in Considering the Meaning of Yesterday's United States Supreme Court Decisions. I - ' I I I 1 .11 ...I 111 THE THEATER OF W-A..R HAS BEE31T JVCO-VEID. GOVERNOR APPOINTS FAIR COMMISSION Nine Missourians .WiHP,rSpare Ex hibit for the State tS' Louisiana Purchase Exposition. MISSOURI COMMISSIONERS. N. H. qentry. Sedalla, Pettis Coun ty. . ... M. T. Davis, Lawrence County. W. H. Marshall.tNew Madrid Coun ty. J. O. Allison, Ralls County. D. P. Stroup, Ray County. Frank J. Moss. St. Joseph. H. C. McDougal, Kansas City. B. H. Bonfoey. Putnam County. T i U F. Parker. St. Louis. REPUBLIC SPECIAL.. Jefferson City. Mo.. May Z7.-The M s tourl Board of Commissioners to the Louis iana Purchase Exposition -was appointed to-day by Governor Dockery. The follow ing well-known Missourians were named to constitute the commission: v. M. Gentry. Pettis County; M. T. Davis. Lawrence County; w. ". aiamuiii. ') friends at home." Madrid County: J. O. Allison. Ralls County, j CoIonel WMe Jones, who Is In command D. P. Stroup. Ray Cou","F"M- !' of South Carolina troops, now here attend Buchanan County; H. C. McDougal, Jaca- , the de,jcnt0n ceremonies, li also a ton County: B. H. Bonroey, ruinam coun ty L. F. Parker. City of St. Louis. Of these Commissioners flvo are Demo crats and the others arc Republicans. Two are farmers, one a railroad man. one a man ufacturer, three are business men and two are lawyers. Personnel of the Commission. M T Davis is a banker, and also inter ested In mining, and is an Influential busi ness man of Southwest Missouri. W H. Marshall l a merchant, and alo largely Interested In farming and In the lumber burlncs In Southeast Missouri. To Allison is a lawyer of distinction In Northeast Missouri, and has represented H county In the State Legl-lature and held XTd R'aSS'SS rarmer of the great agricultural section of North- WrSV Mizry -onllhlAKl Frank J. Miw e lanufacturers of St. Joseph. 7r n.Pv.r nf St. Louis, who represents '.. ' . -n,no,i interests of the State, is 'the general solicitor of the St. Louis and Run Franctsco nanroiiu. B H Bonfoey of Central Northern Mis h eourl U largely Interested In business opera- "h'c McDougal of Kansas City Is an at- 1 torney! who has held various high official pcSttoiw. and is recognlied as a cltlten of "NV'owiWrf CtraI 8outhern M,s mTutI was on the Board or Missouri Com missioners to the Chicago World's Fair; 1b SSBKPol the American Berkshire Hog Association; a director In the American Bhort Horn Cattle Association, and a mem ber of the Executive Committee: Is presi dent of the Association of Exhibitors of IJve Stock of the United States and Can ada; was one of the committee of eighteen live-stock breeders chosen by the Lntted States and Canada to look after the live stock show at the Chicago World's Fair; waa president for seven or eight years of the Central Missouri Fair Association at Sedalla, and Is one of the most progressive live-stock breeders In the United States, w nmwninr riM nnt nnnolnt any of the members of the Legislature, because he was advised by eminent lawyers that such ap- SBlntments would be In violation of the oostltutton. What the Board Has to Do. The compensation allowed the Commis sioners Is $10 a day for services and 15 a day for expenses. The Commissioners will draw pay only when In the actual service of the 8tte. Governor Dockery has given the appoint ment of the commission his entire time for ten days. Nearly all of the members have been at the Capitol for consultation and the pun of procedure has been discussed tntormaUr. when the site for the fair I; chosen the Missouri Commissioners will at one select the place of the Missouri build ing? Plans for the building will then be de signed and the contract let. It will be the purpose of the Commissioners to have the Missouri building completed as soon as pos sible, and begin' the collection of the Mis souri exhibit, for which 0,000,000 was appro crlatrd by the General Assembly. it U estimated that bo genertl appoint- meats, such as department supenmenuenu, soerwuoenta oTVxhlblts and otter, post-. The Do Lima was the first to receive the attention of the court, and, as It appeared to be quite swcoplngly opposed to the Government's contentions, many persons precipitately arrived at the conclusion that the (jovernnient had been worsted all along the Hue. This view suffered a decided change when the conclusion wns announced In the Downes case. The court was very evenly divided on both cases, but political lines were not at nil controlling. The Ue Lima ca!e involved the power of the Government to call a duty on goods imported into the United States from Porto Kii-o after the ratification of the treaty of Tarls and before the passage of the Porto Itican act. The court said the Governments contention in this case was substantially a claim that Porto Klco i foreign territory. The entire case turned upon that contention. The court held that the position was not well taken: that Porto Rico was not at the time foreign territory, and that therefore the duty which had been collected must be returned. The decision in the Downes case followed the history of the dealings of the I'nlted Stales with Porto Klco a step far ther. That ease dealt with the legality of the exaction of duties on goods imported from I'orto Klco into Xew York after GOV. McSWEENEY IS A CANDIDATE. Senators Tillman and McLnurin "" May Not Be Alone in the SonatorialRace. HErUBLIC SPECIAL.. Chattanooga. Tenn., May 27. Governor McSweehey of 8outh Carolina, In a state- mnt here to-day, said that he had re ceived the resignations of Senators Tillman and McLaurln. and that so far as he now ' knows he would make no appointments to All the vacancies to be caused when the resignations take effect. He said that he could not fully determine upon what course he would pursue until he returned home and consulted with his political friends. The Governor Is beyond question a can didate for the United 8tatcs Senate. He refused to positively announce his candi dacy, but on this subject said to a Re public correspondent: "I am not ready to announce my candi dacy to-day. but will have a statement to give out within a few days. I am being urged to make the race, and whatever I may do will depend upon aavice oi ray candidate for the United States Senate. He Ir chairman of the State Democratic Committee. The campaign will take place during Augut. Governor MrHwppnev'H friends and Dartt- sans, who compose the party now with him. avow mat tie is a run-neagea canaiaate. and that he will prove an Important factor In the race. He in looked upon to take a good share of Tillman following, according to his friends. The Governor has been advised by wire to-dav to return home and look over the situation, and answered to-night that ha would probably return home instead of go ing through to the MemphW reunion. Tne canuuiacs' or uoionei jones is looked upon to divide the McLaurln vote. BRYAN FAVORS TILLMAN. Says Senior Senator Reprenents Man, Not Plutocracy. Lincoln, Neb.. May 27. W. J. Bryan gave cut to-day a statement on the resignations of Senators McLaurln and Tillman, which ha says he regards as the political event of last week. Mr. Bryan said: "It Is an honoraLle coutse for the Sen ators to pursue, and beneficial to the State, At the present South Carolina virtually hus rA voice in the settlement of .public ques tions, as the vote of one Senator kills th vote of tho other. . k , . . "Senator Tillman has Just been re-elected and thus risks the loss of a longer term, tut Senator McLaurln really sacrifices more, because he has less chance to win In thMr? BTyanadded that It was hsrdly neces sary to say that he hoped and expected to pee Senator Tillman win a sweeping vic tory "because he represents the man, while Senator McLaurln represents the dollar. The vote will show whether the plutocratic Idea Is making any headway In the Bouth." Map showing the locatio of Sour I ' M I ! Y 1 P fa 5C UB L Mi B. V 'r i I nxPAuft. V- tS in rp hE l i t .7 "-i. r A3. J I xk; .,l hi i( t u I k A 'U! I '";:: on 9flT J -HJ Es2JJM0KT jSyL m.ha.. " ? Py? TowfuuczsrATioH A $r I - . M yi rir V p" ST. LOUIS, LEADING TOPICS -IN- TO-DAY'S REPUBLIC. For Missouri Fulr Tncsriny nnd Wednesday, except probable rtimni In southwest portion. For Illinois Knlr Tnrsduy and Wednesday, except probable shorter In extreme southern portion. For Arkansas Fair and warmer Taesday and Wednesday. Page. 1. Supreme Court's Ruling in Do Lima nnd Downes Cases. 2. The Railroads. Cretd-Rcvlslon Question Settled. Chicago Sustained by Supreme Court. 3. Supreme Court Decisions In Colonial Cases. 4. Steamer Dubuque Goes to the Bottom. Herron Abandons Marriage Ritual. 6. Early Morning Call Results In Arrest. To Place Flowers on Lincoln's Tomb. 6. Results at the Race Tracks. 7. BaebaH'Gnmcs. Editorial. Fair Executive 'Named To-day. Committee May Be 9. Bartlett Tells How He Killed Edwards. ' t 10. Republic Wnnt Advertisements. Record of Births, Marriages, Deaths. 11. Republic Want Advertisements. lJ. Grain and Other Markets. 13. Financial News. 11. Gooseberries and Cherries on Bale. Gave Purse to Their Pastor. WANT JUDGMENT SET ASIDE. Creditors of Late Mayor Strong After Certain Securities. New York, May 27. Elizabeth. Jano nnd Frank" T." Grlswold. creditors of the estate of the lata W. I Strong, have asked tho Supreme Court to set aside Judgments In four suits brought against the executors, Putnam Bradlee Strong nnd Albert Bhat tuck. by which J200.000 worth of securities found among the ex-Mayor's paperB wero divided between Mary U. Strong, the wid ow; her brother, Robert W. Aborn, and her two sisters, Mrs. Rebecca S. Beaaley and Mrs. Josephine W. Hojan. It Is charged that tho suit was a "family affair": that the executors did not defend the suit In good faith, but connived with the plaintiffs In procuring tho Judgments. It la further set forth In the papers on file that after the relatives of the ex-Mayor had appropriated the $200,000 In securities the sum total of the assets remaining to meet the Grlswolds' claim of 1350.000 was M.000. take, Tex where the new oil strike oeen maac. MO., TUESDAY. MAY ADMINISTRATION'S COLONIAL POLICY THE IDEA !( WHOLLY IXCOVl.TES,T WITH THE SPIRIT AD GE.MIS AS WELL WOIIUS OF THE COXSTITITIOV. Justice Harlan. The opinions, snlmlantlallr com plete, handed down by the Supreme J Court In the De Lima and Ilownes ln- nine en.. -a. Trill be found on rt' Three. "CALLS FOR NO CHANGE OF POLICY." DY sm.lCITOn. (JEM'.UAI. ItlCIlATtDS. Wnshlnstiin, Mny 27. The decision of the court calls for no chnnRe of policy. It sustains to the fullest ex tent the no-enlled Insular policy nf the nilmlnlatrntlpn. The (internment nnrr linn the sanction of the Supreme Conrt for Kntcrhlnn the Islands as their needs and onr Interests require. Tho Itrpuhllc Hureau. llth St. anil IVnn"lnnla Ave. Washington, May 27. The United States Supreme Court to-day rendered decisions In the long-pending, and far-reaching Porto Rlean cipcs. The net result of the decisions Is to sustain the-administration. In so far as its policies since the passage of the For aker act are concerned, nnd to reverse the ndmlnlitratlon as to Its policies prior to the passage of the Forakcr act. The collection of duties upon Imports from Porto Rico by the Treasury Department, for the period between the plgnlng of the treaty of Paris in April, 1899, and the passage of the Koraker net, I? held to have been un constitutional; and all these duties will be refunded by the Treasury Department. The amount Is estimated at about $3,000,000. The court holds that the Constitution does not. In nil cases, follow the flag, by Its own lorcc. It distinguishes between organ ized territory nnd the States ot the Union for the purpose of levying Federal duties. DECISION IX TUB OH LIMA CASK. Briefly stated. In the De Lima case. In volving the collection of duties on goods imported from Porto Rico after the slsrn Inn nf the trrnty of peace with Spain nnd before the nnnxnKe nf the Koraker net. the court held that the Imposition of duties was unconstitutional; that the island of Porto HIco wns not then n foreign but a domestic territory. The provisions of the Dlngley tariff net, under which these duties were collected, prccrlbed that the duties should be Imposed on certain nrtlcles com ing from a foreign country. The Dlngley net contained no provision authorizing tho Imposition of duties coming from n domestic territory. The Circuit Court for New York, which held that there duties were constitutional,- is reversed. Tho court wni filled to suffocation with prominent lawyers, among them being James Hagermnn of Missouri. ex-Senator Llndsny of Kentucky, one of the St. Louis World's Fair 'Commissioners; Senator Lodge of Massachusetts, chairman of the Insular Affairs Committee; Chairman Can non of tho Appropriation1! Committee, At torney General Knox, Secretary ot War Root and many other of the foremost law yers who practice before till" court. Tho decision In the Supreme Court was hy a divided bench, the opinion nf Mr, Justice Brown, who delivered the Judgment of the court, being concurred In by Chief Justice Puller and Associate Justices Har lan, Brewer and Pcckhnm; and dlscented from by Juxtlccs McKenna, White, Gray and Shlras. In the case of Goetzc against tho United States, Involving tho collection of duties under the Forakcr act, the opinion was nl ho written by Mr. Justice Brown. In brief, It held that In legislating fur ter- CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER. rltorles newly acquired by Congress the constitutional rule of uniformity as to all duties on Imports, customs nnd excises ap plies only to the States; that It Is within the power of Congress to Impose such du ties on newly acquired domestic territory. This opinion was concurred In by Justice Gray, Shlras, While and McKenna. IIBMARKABI.B FEATURE OF THE DECI9IOX. a somewhat remarkable feature of the decision was the opinion of Justice While, " ""- ---- -. ------ - who concurred In the judgment of the Court, but dissented from all the reasoning of Jus tlce Brown's opinion, reaching the same conclusion by materially different methods. In this esse, the dissenting opinions of Chief Justice Fuller and Justice Harlan were de livered with great force and earnestness. and attracted marked attention among the hundreds of lawyers present In the court. Their dissenting views will be read with Interest by lawyers everywhere, because ot their vigorous denunciation of the doctrine that there can be such an Inconsistency aa the power of Congress to act outside of the limitations oi the Constitution. Mr. Jus- mm It y mwmmt.im y&mmmmS lu tC Fm&&mfMWm a 28. 1901. the passage of the Koraker act providing for a duty upon goods shipped from the Tiilted States into Porto Klco, and also on those shipped from Porto HIco to the I'nlted States. In this cae the court held that such exaction was legal and con stitutional. Tile point of the two opinions, considered collectively, is that Porto Itleo was never after the acquisition of that is land foreign territory: that until Congress acted upon the question no duty could be collected, but that as soon as Con gress outlined a method of contiolliug the island's revenues that action became binding. In other words, that Congress has power under the Constitution to pren'ribe the manner of collecting the revenues of the country's insular possessions, and has the right to lay a duty on goods imported into our insular possessions from the I'nlted States or exported from them Into the United States. It holds, in brief, that for taxation pm poses tlieyare not a part of the United States to the extent that goods shipped between their ports and the United States are entitled to the same treatment as though they weie shipped between New York and New Orleans. IS SUSTAINED BY SUPREME COURT. Highest Tribunal of the Land Decides That Congress Has Plenary I'ower in Governing the Islands, Un rest rioted by Constitutional Limitations Vote Is Five to Four, and Powerful Dissent ing Opinions Are Voiced by Chief Justice Fuller .Hid Others Porto liico Is a Part of the United States. If pB ssssssl) JUSTICE PECKHAM. JUSTICE BnBWCn. JUST1CK FHIP.AS. xtWluW&U0UMWMT JUSTICE IIAHLAX. tlce Harlan rhnracterlzcd It as nbvurd that there could be two governments of the United 8tntes, one under the Constitution and the other outside of the Constitution. Broadly stated, the decision In the Qoetze case supports tho contention of the admin istration In regard to the power of Con gress to legislate for the territories re gardless of the limitations of the Constitu COURT DECIDES THAT CONGRESS HAS PLENARY POWER, UNRESTRICTED BY CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS. HOW THE COURT STOOD. Tho vole In the Downes cane, tho most Important one, stood as fol lows: Fur tlie (internment. Justice Ilrowu (Itep.). Justice (Iruy (Itep.). Justice Shlras (Hep.). Justice McKenna (Itep.). Justice White (Uem.). Attains! the llovrrnnieiil. Chief Justice Puller (lleni.). J list leu Harlan (Hep.). Jtirtlcc Pecklium (Dent.). Justice llrewer (Itep.). I nni'tiiii.ie Hi'ia'iAh. WnshltiKlon, Mny ZT. Congress has ple nary power In ItKlslatlhff for the territorial possessions of the tTnltnl Htntes, unre stricted by the Constitutional limitations which govern It in legislating for Ilia States. This, In a sentence. Is the meaning of the decisions announced by tho Supreme Court of tho United States to-day In Hie Insular cases. In other words, (he Canstllatlnn ' Ihr United States dues not follow III flaa. It dors nut sjo, of Its onrn purrnr. Into newly acquired territory, but can only br carried Into aurh terri tory by the action nf L'unajress. The declulons, taken collectively, sustain the colonial policy of the administration In Its essential fentuns. The validity nf Hie collection of duties Hy the military authori ties both before ami after the ratlllcatlon of the treaty Is sustained. Tho constitu tionality of the Torto Itican net Iminxlng duties on Roods Imported from I'orto Itlco Into the United Htntes nnd on goods Im ported from the United Stntes Into I'orto Itlco Is sustained, and It follows thai Con gress has power to enact u similar law im posing duties on the commerce betwi en the Philippines nnd the United States. Under these decisions, however, the du ties collected on Imports from I'orto HIco In the Interval between the' ratification of the treaty of peace ami the going Into ef fect of the I'orto Hlcun law were Illegally collected, and will have to be refunded; tlif duties which were collected on Imports from Hawaii between the passage of the. Ha waiian annexation resolution and the tak ing effect cf the Hawaiian territorial gov ernment law. were Illegally collected, and will have to be refunded, 'and nil the du ties that have been collected on Imports from the Philippines since the ratification , j me treaty oi pea.ee, nave ucen meg"" coiiectC(j ani mufi be refunded. Until Con- gress otherwise directs, It will be Illegal to collect any duties whatever on Imports from the Philippines, and In the meantime all the products of those Islands can come Into the United States free of duty. Even Lawyers Coafased. The action of the court In sustaining the constitutionality of the Porto Itican law and In denying the validity of the taxes col lected on Import from Porto Rico Into tho United States prior to the taking effect of that law. has given rise to confusion even In the minds of some lawyers who have not studied the decisions careiuuy. The reasoning by which the court arrived QUESTIONS SETTLED BY THE COURT'S DECISIONS. 1. Congress 1ms plvunry power to legislate for the territorial possessions or the United States. 2. Validity of the collection of custtoms taxes hy the military authorities in 1'orto HIco, tioth before and after the ratification of the treaty of peace and be fore the taking effect of the Porto Klcan act. Is sustained. 3. Customs taxes were wrongfully collected on Imports into the United States from Porto Itlco after the ratification of the treaty of peace and before the taking effect of the Porto Itican act; on Imports Into the United States from the Philippines since the ratification of the treaty of pence, and on imports from Hawaii into the United States after the annexation and before the taking ef fect of the Hawaiian territorial government law. 4. The validity of the duties collected both In the United States and In Porto HIco tinder the Porto Hlcau act Is sustained, and the constitutionality of that law is sustained. 5. All duties collected on imports from Porto Rico between the ratification of the treaty of peace and the taking effect of the Porto Itican law. If paid uuder protest, must be refunded by the Government. Under these decisions territory can he held Indefinitely as colonies under such form of government ns Congress shall see fit to prescribe. They may re cclve complete territorial governments, such as that of New Mexico and that which was given to Hawaii during the last session of Congress. They may re ccive limited territorial governments, mich as that which waa conferred upon I'orto Itlco, or their government may be put entirely In the hands of the Presl dent, ns wns done In the case of the Philippines by the Spooner amendment to the nrmy appropriation bill. tion in so far as the Imposition of taxes Is concerned, but the Court held that the great principles of the Constitution which secure life, liberty and prosperity to every person within the domain of the United States are of universal force and application, but that Congress could be trusted not to violate any of these great principles In dealing with the territories. at thesej conclusions Is rather Involved. It was hcluf In the De Lima rnss that as soon as the treaty of pence wan ratified Porto Itlco passed under the sovereignty of the United States, ceased to be foreign territory and became territory belonging to the United States. As the Dlnsley tariff law. under which the duties were collected, prdvldes only for tho collection or duties on articles Imported from "foreign countries," the court held that Hi duties prescribed by this law could ontv be collected nn articles Imported from foreign countries and not on article from I'orto Klco. which hid ceased in oe "foreign country" within tho meaning of the Dlnslev act. ' It wns not held In this case that duties on articles coining from I'orto Itlco could not be collected without violation of the Constitution, but simply that thtre was no law on the statute books at 'hat lime pro viding for the collection of such duties. Then, when the Downs ease Involving the constitutionality nf Ihe Porto Hlcsii aft and the validity or the duties collected un der It was taken up the court held In effect that this act had supplied (he defect In the Dlngley law hy prescribing the taxes which should he levied on articles Imported from I'orto Itlco. Prrsldrnt Completely Sastalaed. While the Immediate question Involved In all the cases before the court were ques tions unvoting the colli ctlon of customs du ties, they nre not limited In their effects to merely prescribing the methods by which customs ran be collected on commerce be tvveii the United States and the Insular poi-seislons. The decisions set the seal of constitutionality on all the acts of the Presi dent In I'orto Itlco and the Philippines prior io the action or conxress. ana antrm not only the constitutionality of Ihe Porto nican net, but ot me apoouer i-nunpine iimenu ment as well. They establish once for all tho absolute power of Congress to govern the territorial potsesslons of the United Ftates without regard to the limitations ut tho Constitution, which apply to legislation for the States, unless It he those provisions tvhteh are In the form of absolute prohibi tions upon the power of Congress, such as the provision that "no bill of attainder or ex post fucto law shall be passed." SENATOR LINDSAY INTERPRETS DECISION. Th Republic Ilurtiu. Hth 8t. and Pennsylvania Ate. Washington. May 27,-Former Senator William Lindsay of Kentucky, one of the St Louis World's Fair Commissioners, who is regarded as one of the foremost consti tutional lawyers of the country, and who was of counsel for the appellant In the doetzo case, was present nt the Supreme Court Monday and heard the decisions, sen ator Lindsay said to The Republlo corre spondent: "The Government contended and collected revenues from Porto Rico under the Dlngley tariff act from the ttme of the ratification of the peace treaty up to the PMsag of the Foraker act. Aa to those taxes Ike dovernment lose Its east.. a majority of .. . tinMlnv'that noon the ratification I nt ths treatv of neace. Porto Rico ceased to be a foreign country nJ that the Dlngley price sr&s Loala, Two ceata. Tkree Cents. AS WITH THE JUSTICE BROWN. PRESIDENT NOTIFIED. Sidney. Nb., May .Z7.-The Presi dent and the Cabinet received the of clal Information hire that the Su preme Court had decided the Insu lar cases In accordance with the con tention of the Government. The news came In the shnpe of a telegram from Solicitor General John If. Richards. Naturally the Presi dent and Cabinet officers were elated over the victory, although they have never doubted that the decision would be In favor of the Govern ment. a 1 . s tariff duties routd be Imposed only on good Imported, from a foreign country, "The majority of the court held that the Foraker act, so far a It Imposed a duty on goods Imported Into the United States from Pcrto Rico, or upon goods from th United Slates Into Porto Rico, I constitutional and In that respect Ihe contention of the Government I sustained. "Th majority of the court held (hat tha acquisition of foreign territory by treaty doe not so far Incorporate the territory acquired ns to render It nrt of Ihe Uni ted States within all Ihe protection and limitation of Hie Constitution, but ttmt nn all questions affretlng what may be culled, th natural Individual rights. Hi majority nf th court held Hist Congress may legis late st Its discretion affecting the terri tories, and In that respect tint contention of the (lot eminent Is sustained, "Ho far a the concrete question of wheth er or not th Constitution follows the flag Is concerned, the decision of Ihe court I not specific, but an Inference may be drawn from the holding of the majority of tho court that It does not necessarily do so. "The logic of the decision to-day would be that taxes and duties so fur collected from exports, Imports, ate, In the Philip pine are Illegal. Several time In tho de rision regarding the I'orto Itlco casus it was stated that where 'title and possession' passed to th United States, and this may menn that on account of the Insurrection In (he Philippine the United Slates had title, but not possession, and may affect tha 1'hlllpplne cases. Th court may also de cide whether or not Congress had the right to delegate to (he President the power giv en him hv the Spooner bill, which was en acted nt the last session of Congress," FORAKER SAYS HIS PARTY IS VINDICATED. 11V SENATOR J. D. FOHAKKTt. RRPIIHMC BTnciAI,. New York, May J7. Th decision Is complete Vindication of the position held by the Republican party with respect to th power of Congress to legislate for Porto Rico and the Philippine and settles It. "once for oil," that the United State la the equal In sovereign power ot any other Independent Government The Supreme Court decides that I'orto Rico, being a Territory of the United States, Is not a part of the United States, but only territory belonging to the United States, and that It I, therefore, within th constitutional power of Congress to so leg islate with respect to It, Including th Im position ot tariff duties, aa It may see nt. and that Congress, having' so legislated on April It IMS, the provision of that law ar valid and to be upheld and enforced. In other words, th effect of the decision la that tha Constitution doe not follow th na. and that Congress ha plenary power units tha Constitution to govern our Insu lar acquisitions according to their mpectWa I neeeselUe. Ill BBBSIvSSSKB H JCSTICH WHITE. JUSTICE ORAT. y'w 'tBssssBl J. iHPBSSWr JL'BTICB MfKENNA. sBsssssfs-aBassaV BSleBSF?VrBSSB IsTwsHi i .l '.aa arm oe znauv vi js ggfe ii S.Vfr.. iL ifc'i lJ':Sn.&.l.,:fr iJ&f & ;r-V