Newspaper Page Text
1 : ■^vg!^"ri respective friend ; and ihre%m* “®™ ,* room, I remarked to him, r, J duly Consider whether the offe,0‘ the mission to JKussia would afford sue RM. 0PP°*“'-un,*y-. With inexpressiblehowc. Ver. 1 in a few d?d ‘earned, that during the last session o‘lai" "‘embers of Con gress had Ke enabled, in returning to their respecti - ho"‘es. to state, that this identical off- wcu‘d he made tonic with tbc view of pi-,no Mr. Monroe in the Depart • meiit of i?*116-. ‘ ‘1‘* intelligence I, of course, mentio--d w‘th H becoming indignation to M .Madison upon his application af. (e.^mus to me for the result of my rflections on the proposed mission. He, immediately, but with evident confusion, ■pri/je^ted that he had not in any manner whatever authorised such a report, or even such an idea. I replied, that 1 surely ought not to attribute to a President of the U. States a transaction so base But as a re port of so delicate a character had actual ly gone forth, my sense of honor could not hesitate a moment in rejecting the offer of! the mission. Nor could I, upon the same principle, allow myself, under such cir- i cumstances, to retain my commission ofSe- ' cretai y of State. I closed the conversation by remarking, with great composure, that | there must have been in this affair a most i shameful intrigue. And, with very great difficulty.I suppressed the inclination I felt, to tell him, that of this intrigue he had in. considerately been the dupe. The power of a President of the U. S. to rem, ve any officer, other than a judge, will not he controverted. . Ncr will any preten sion be set up so absurd, as a right to an of. fice. But it is maintained that this power cannot, consistently with the genius of our Government, and with the respect due to the Senate, be exercised, as under an arbi trary ^Despotism, at, the mere caprice.,.of the Chief: but that in every such exercise of power, a President of the U. States must necessarily act upon his responsibility to his constituents for the rectitude of his mo tives. l”his brings me to the ground to be examined, namely, the measures alluded to by Mr. Madison, upon which has been founded his conduct towards me on this oc'_ •csl-ion. Each, then, of the several measures, ■important, or unimportant,in which there has 'been at anytime, a difference of opinion be tween us, i will now, unreservedly in dis ’tinct articles, present to the view of the A merican People ; with a hope, perhaps de lusive, that they will therein find an apolo gy, if not a justification, in my behalf. 1st The following lette'r was not prepa red in virtue of any direction, or even inli 'frfafioh from Mr. Madison. It was written und sent by me when lie was at his seat in "Virginia. Before his departure from Wash ington, he, however, knew, that I, had it iu cont-emp’-.tion to make such a call up on Mr. Erskme, and, as he had expressed no disapprobation, it of course took place. 21ut I have since learned that he was not n iittle displeased that such an enquiry had been at all stirred. ivly fellow-citizens, in reading the letter, and in adverting to the denouement, will, I trust, have no difficulty in estimating the purity of my motives, and as little in disco vering'he ground of his displeasure. “ Mr. Smith to Mr. Euskine. Department or State, Aug 9, 1809. Sill, 1 luve just received from Mr. P'nkney; a letter, inclosing a printed paper, purporting to be a copy of a despatch to you from Mr. Can ning, which states, among other things, that from the report cf your conversations with Mr. Madison, Mr. Gallatin and Mr. Smith, it up pears. 1st. “ That the American government is pre pared, in the event of his Majesty's consenting lo withdraw the orders in council ef January &. Novembe r, 1807, to withdraw contemporane ously on ts part, the interdiction of its harbors to ships of war, and all non-intercourse and non importation acts, so far as respects G. B. leav ing them in force with respect lo France, and the powers which adopt or act under her de crees : 2d " That America is willing to renounce, during the present war, the pretension of carry ing on in time of war all trade with the ene mies’ colonies, from which she was excluded dufilig pence : 3*1 G B. lor the purpose of securing the o peration of the embargo, and the bona file in tention of America, to prevent her citizens from trading with France, ami the powe.s adopting & acting under the French decrees, is to be con asideredas being at Liberty to capture all such American vessels as may be found attempting to trade with the ports of any of these powers; ■without which security for Ihe observance of the embargo, the raising ;t nominally, with res pect to G. ii alone would in fact raise it with respect to all the world-” I have the honor to request you to favor me with such explanations as your candor will at once suggest, in relation to these imputed con versations. 1 forbear to «zpre&'Wyoa, air, tire surprise ! that is felt at the extraordinary pretensions set ■forth in this letter of instructions, and eapeoaly j at th- expectation that this Government would i •as a preliminary, recogftiie conditions, two of ’•which arc so manifestly irreconcileable to the dignity and interest of the U. S. 1, however, -Wouid remark that, uad you deemed it proper *ohave communicated tn nctetfto this letter, it •would have been impossible for the President »r> have perceived in its conditions or in its spi jit, that conciliatory disposition which had be»n professed, 8s. which, it was hoped, had really jrxisted. , 1 am, &c. (Signed) H. SMITH.” 1/ie /ton U. i>l. Arsxtne 2d. There was a serious difference of o_ |>ini >n bet ween Mr. Madison and myself up on tnt bill, touching our foreign relations, which was introduced by Mr.Macon early in the session of 1809—-10. The policy, at once developed in that bill, became a subject of u niversal disapp. obation. Not a word in its favor was to be found in any print. It was, therefore, most fortunately not forced up on 'he nation. In its place, however, wit nubs itutetl 'he Act of May, 1810, which th voice of the people, in the expression of Jo i indignation, in derision, called Macon, iNo. 2. All that odium, which these two bills had CX.‘Red throughout the IJ. States, was, by Tt certain management, fastened upon Mr.. jVlacor. wu<« O' In i s. In these measures, as on wist; tit humiliating, Mr. Madison was not at all acen by hi> constituents. Not a ftuspicoA V»«S ffiiuttained. that he had any participation in acts **> poorly calculated to effectuate theii protested purpose of aveiig iugihe insults, of repairing the injuries and «/. maintaining the lights ot the 0. ft.—To Siccount. »lu ii I i the very acute sensibility o' Mr. Madison, as to these two bills, it has L '.me indispem«biy ugreafmr) to the pur j> t oithis a do less, to thaw the mysterious a iurn, that bad at brat entirely, and yet »; i <»ib voii tu.^e trar.iax.'.iJTis, avj n | state to my conniryitTen, that the rtprobat ed Bills, usually culled Macon’s Bill, No. 1. and Macon’s Bill, No. 2, were in tact the special contrivance of Mr. Madison himself; that they were his great and efficient mea sures of the session ; that instead of being recommended to Congress by the President himself, as the constitution has wisely re quired, they were severally, through a cer tain medium, handed to Mr. Macon, to be, it would seem, by him recommended. Of these two measures, which were alike regardless of the prosperity and of the ho Dor of the U. S. I could not permit myself to be the advocate ; and, especially, as I was well persuaded, that the good sense, the honorable principles and the patriotic feelings of my countrymen would utterly condemn them. 3d. During the session of 1809—10, cer tain members of the Legislature, nof satis, tied with .the policy of he measure, that had been proposed by Mr. Macon, strongly and repeatedly urged Mr. Madison to re. commend to Congress, by a message, -the necessity oF bringing forth the resources of the nation, for the purpose of avenging the insults, of repairing the injuries and of maintaining tne rights of the 17. States— Yielding to their importunities, he finally sent to Congress the following message : " TAr Presidents Mcss.'ge to both houses of Con gress delivered on the 3rd oj fan. 1810. 't'o the Senate and House of Representatives of the . U. S.. . . ■ The act authorising a detachment of one hun dred thousanU men from the militia will expire on the 30th of March next. Its early revival is recommended, in order that timely steps may be taken for arrangements, such as the act con templnted. ...... .... I.» Without inerfering with the modifications ten dered necesaary by the defects, or the ineflicacy of the laws restrictive of commerce 5c navigation, or with the policy of disallowing to foreign ar med vessels, the use of our waters ;it falls with in. my duty to recommend also, that in addiiion to the precautionary measure authorised by that j act, and to the regular troops, for completing establishment ot which enlistments are renewed, every necessary provision may be [ made, for a voluniw r force of twenty thousand men, to be enlisted for a short period, and held in a state of organization and readiness for actu al service, at the shortest warning I submit to the consideration of Congress, moreover, the expediency of such a classifies | .ion Sc organization ot the militia,as will beat in | a,,re prompt St successive aids, from that source, | adequite to emergencies, which may call for | them. ii'Wiu res. with them also, t<* determine how far further provision may ha expedient, tor put ting into actual service, if necessary, any part of the naval armament not now employed. At a period presenting features in the con duct of foreign powers towirds the U. S. which impose on them the necessity of precautionar-. measures involving expense, it is a happy const i deration that such is the solid state of the public credit, hat reliance can be’justly placed, on any legal provision that may be'made for re sorting to it, in a convenient form, & to an ade quate amount. . JAMES MADISON.” January 3, 1810 1q this i*Iessat*e I had the foltowing objections : 1st. If the honor and the interest of the U States did imperiously call for war, then, instead of the half-way measures contemp lated in the message, the recommendation ought to have been, that the abundant phy. •sical resources of the nation, should be du lly organized and brought forth with atone, that would unequivocally manifest at home and abroad a determination to take a man ly stand, and, especially, as such a precau tionary measure has, not tmfrequently, had the cfleet ot averting war 2d. Il war was not the real object, whence was the necessity of filling the public niind with the alarm of war ? Whence the pro priety of expending our treasures in calling to arms 20,000 such men ? Whence the policy of trifling with the manly, gene r- us feelings ot a brave, honorable, enter prising people, as are the people of the U. Stales i 3d. At all events, whatever may have been the real object, the studied ambigui. ty of the language of the message, formed of itself a sufficient objection. Of this am biguity Mr. Madtson was duly apprised.— And, as was foreseen, members of Con gress, not comprehending its meaning, ap_ plied, but in vain, for the requisite expla nation. At length, a republican Senator, distinguished by his sound principles as a statesman, as well ss by his independent feelings as a gentleman, did, in a very » hie speech, make among other topics, the following pithy comment upon this extraor dinary message; i lie s'resiuem s message of the 3d inst. has been introduced by the chairman of the committee in support of this Bill. Feeble must be the aid which this measure can derive from that source. This message, in point of obscurity, comes nearer my ideas of a Delphic Oracle, than any state paper which has come under my inspection. It is so cautiously expressed, that every man puts what construction upon it he pleases. Is he tor war i The message breathes no thing but destruction and bloodshed. Is he for peace ? The message U mere milk and water, and wholly pacific Is he for the bill before you * '{ he message calls for its passage. Is he a friend to a large standing army f Why, then the message means 20 000 regular troops. ]» he friendly to the militia * The message does not call for regular troops—it meuns militia. Thus, sir, the message means any thing, or nothing, at the will of the commentator. If this message is oracular in its meaning, it was no less miraculous in its promulgation. The newspapers to the east of this, stated, that such a message would be delivered, and stated its contents nearly one week before it reached the two houses of Congress.—— lo account for this Phenomenon, is neither within my power or province.” 'tth i he non-intercourse law of the last ■«c<*-.ion was also the device of Mr. Madison. It, too, was introduced by Presidential Ma chinery. • Should this statute be viewed, as it ought to he, in connexion with, and u* emanating from, the law of May, 1810, then will we have to look for the “ fact”’required bv that law, namely, the actual revocation of the Berlin and Milan decrees if this revocation did in fact take place, as dcclat ed by the proclamation, then the act ol May, commimicated as it had been by the ex cutive to the two belligerent pow ers, did become i/mo facto k compact be tween the U. Stales aud France, and ir, that case, neither parly had a right to disre gard, or by law to change, its stipulated t.irms and conditions, as this government confessedly did by tlie non-intercourse act of the last session. i'lu act of May, mp, it i/ a sorrowf* trtJ'Ti; did not provide For several obvious ea ses, wherein our merchants must necessa rily have been much injured in the event of that law having been carried iu.o effect in the crude form in which it had been pass ed. Of this improvidence, our citizens might, in fuchcase, well have complained against their Representatives, Executive as well as Legislative: but from it, our govern ment most assuredly could not have deduc ed a right to alter of itself, the conditions of the compact. The other party might, indeed, from a sentiment of compassion fur our artless simplicity, have consented to such a change ; but, without such au ac. (juiessence. it could not, upon any principle of natural or political lav/, be done. If, however, the Emperor of the French did not in fact revoke, as declared by the Proclamation, the Berlin autl Milan de crees, the act of May did not become a com pact between the U. States and France; and, in that case, his imperial majesty had no claim against this government, founded upon that statute, to enforce the non inter course against the other belligerent. , What, then, was the evidence which had ; induced Congress to consider these decrees j repealed, and which had accordingly indu ced them to pass the non-intercourse law * To the President in this as in every other case touching our foreign relations, the Legislators must necessarily have looked for information and recommendation. From him they had in due form received what, they , imagined, they were officially bound to consider as satisfactory evidence of the repeal of these decrees, namely, his Procla motion and his message containing a recom mendation to enforce»hc act of May, 1810 In respect then to, tkis evidence and in pur suance of thisrecoomendatioo did Congress pass the act called the non-intercourse law of the last 9essioi. , _ . . This non -intercourse law,let itbe distinct ly kept in mind Was passed after the arri val at Washington of the new French min ister, viz, on the 2nd day of March, 1811. And I have., moreover, to entreat my coun trymen del’fierati-iy and dispassionately to view it in cinriexion with my letters* to gen eral Armstrong of the 5th of June and 5th of July, 1^10, with my letter to General Turreat of the 18th December, 1810, and with tie inf.-rmation hereafter detailed in the 8tA article of this address. And, then I tru4t, they will have a clear perception of the real ground of Mr. Madison’s enmity toinewilh respect to this measure. i'uiwiui:>L«*uuiiig uic|)iLxibc protestation, solemnly communicated to the French Gov ernment and openly promulgated to the whole world,in virtue of the letters from the Sate Department of June and July 1810, that •• a satisfactory provision for restoring the property, lately surprised and seized by the order or at the instance of the French Go vernment must be combined with a repeal of the French Edicts with a view to a non. intercourse with Great Britain,” yet, it is a fact, that before the passing of the non intercourse law of the last session, viz. on the 20m Feb. 1811, the French Government did officially and formally through their minister Mr. Surrurier communicate to this Government their fixed determination not to restore the /iro/tcrly that had been ao\sei zed: And, moreover,from the information, which had been received by Mr. Madison, prior tothedateof the non-intercourse law', it was, at the time of passing it, evident to my mii.d, that the Berlin and Milan De. crees had not been ievoked, as had been declared by the Proclamation. Sth. At the session cf Congress, 1809— ! 10, a law was passed making some new re ! gulations, as to ministers and Barbary con. J suls. To this law Mr. Madison saw strong objections-so strong, indeed, that he has • hithertd utterly disregarded its provisions, i Not having deemed it a4visable, at the time j this bill was submitted to him for his appro [ bation, to return it with his negative, and . not having considered it expedient at the : last session to recommend, as the constitu I lion requires, its repeal or its modification, | he, , at a late period of th< session pressed I mc much to prevail opoi some member jto introduce, with that viev, a bill into Con jgresB. I remarked to him, as respectfully ! as I could, tbatl had powerful objecti ms to every kind of private intermeddling with the business of members of the Legislature, and, especially, to such secret modes of re commending public measures'to the consi | deration of Congress He received my re mark with great perturbition, and was evi dantly much displeased. Owijg to the untoward provisions of this law and to the unfortunate rules of Mr Madison’s calculating policy six at least of our functionaries abroad, not holding their appointments as this law directs, are not entitled to and cannot receive the compensation provided by law for their services. 6th. Sensible as I ever have been, to the insults and injuries, which the IT.S. have received, again and again, from G. Britain, I have at no time been bliud to the reitera ted outrages of France. And whatever may have been my view of the edicts and proceedings of either of these powers com pared with those of the other, I, in my dis cussions with their respective functionaries, have, invariably had my eye steadily on the rights, the interest and the honor of the U. S Never have I felt a disposition to identi fy my country with either of the bellige rent nations. Never did I abstain from as serting the rights or from vindicating the ho nor of the (J. S. from an apprehension that either France or G. Britain might thereby be exhibited to the world in an odious point of view, The following draught of a letter to General Armstrong was accordingly pre * Extract of a latter from t-he Secretary of State to Cen. Armstrong, elated ” June 5tb, 1810. ” If, however, the arrangement contemplated by the law should be acceptable to the French Government, you will understand it to be the purpose of the President, not to proceed in giv ing it effect, in case the late seizure of the pro perty of the citizens of the 17. S. has been follow ed by an absolute confiscation, and restoration he finally refused. The only ground, short of a preliminary restoration of the property, oft which the contemplated arrangement can he made, will he an understanding that the confiscation is reversible, and that it will become immediate ly Hie subject ol discussion with a reasonable prospect r.f justice to our injured citizens." Extract of a letter from the iecretaty of State to Gen, Armstrong, tinted u July Mh, 1810. ** As has been heretofore stated lo you, a sa tisfactory provision for restoring the property lot*, ly surprised and seized by the order or &t Hie instance of the French Govei nmeut, must be combined with » repealo( the French Edicts, with a view to a non-intercojerse with G. II. such a provision being an indispentttble evidence of thejtut puiyosc of France towards the U 9.", ipared by me immediately after the letter* of the Duke <>f Cadot«, which it refers. I had been received. it was ' in the usual, form laid before thev president for his ap probation. Hr, however, •bjected to the sending of it. And, as there is reason to believe, that this very letter constituted part of the ground of the hostid/y of Mr. Ma dison to me, it is but proper to give it pub* lifitv. Copy of the draught of the letter proposed to be sent to Gen. Armstrong. Department or Stats, June—, 1811). Gen. Aumstkong, Your letters of the-with their respective enclosures were received on the 2lst day of May. In the note of the Duke of Cadore nothing can be perceived to justify the seizure of the A merican property in the ports of France and in those of her allies. The facts as well al the ar* gummlN, which it ha* assumed, are confuted by events known to the world, and particularly by that moderation ol temper, which has invaria bly distinguished the conduct of this Govern ment towards the belligerent nations. After a forbearance equalled only by our steady obser vance of the laws of neutrality an 1 of t lie imnvi 1 table principles of justice, it is with no little , surprise that the President discerns in the i French Government a disposition to represcut j the U. S. as the original aggressor. An act of i violence, which under existing circumstances is scarcely less than an act of war, necessarily : required an explanation, which would satisfy 1 not only the U. S. but the world. But the note I ol the Duke ol Cadore, instead of u justifica i- o | has not furnished even a plausible palliation or » I reasonable rpology foe the seizure of tlie Ame rican p. opertj. There has never '.teen ; piriod of time when the 17. S. have ceased l<» pro'eat against the Bri tish Orders in Council With regard to tl*C re sistance which the U. S. m.y nave deemed it proper to oppose to such unlawful restrictions, it obviously belonged to the American Govern ment alone to prescribe the mode, li a system of exclusion of the vessels and merchandise of the Belligerent powers from our ports has been preferred to war,if municipalprohibition has been resorted to instead of invasive retaliation, with what propriety can Ui- Emperor of the French pretend to see in that method of pro ce ding any thing e)3e than a lawful exercise of So creign power ? To construe the exercise of this power into a cause ot warlike reprisal is ., species ol dictation, which, could it be admitted, would nave a tendency to subvert the Sovereignty of the U.S. * .i«mcu«»cWnWea our law or exclusion m. to a^pn. text tor the seizure ot'the property of >.he U S. rtiis statute was also in force against the vessels of G B. If its operation had been considered by the French Government as of suf ficient efficacy tojustify this pretended icprisal, that very operation, as it would have been more severely felt by G. B. ought also to have been considered as constituting a resistance to her or ders, the non-cx>stence of which resistance has been stated by the Duke cf Cadore as the pre texijfor the act of violence exercised on the | Am; rican property. TheLT. S., having resisted the British Orders, the real ground of complaint would seem to be, not so much that the Ame ncan government has not resisted a tax on their navigation, as that it has likewise resisted the French decrees, which had »*sunr d a prescrip live power over the policy of the U. S. as icore hensible as the attempt of the British Govern ment to levy contributions an our trade was ob noxious. Placed in a situation where at*x was proclaimed on the one hand, and a rule of action prescribed on the other, the U. S. owed it to their own honor to resist with corresponding measures the cupidity oflheoneand the pro sumption of the other. TFlien the American Go vernment sees >n the provisions of the British or ders an assumption of jnaritime power in contra vention of the Law of Nations,how can it tail al so to perceive in the French decrees the adop tion of a principle equally derogatory and inju rious 10 the neutral character >f th** U. S. The pretension, ot subjecting American navi gation to a lux, is advanced by the British order of Nov 1807, v^as in reality withdrawn by the order of the 26th of April, 1339. Y-t 10 moths subsequent to the recul of that pretension, its al ledged existence is made the basis reproach against the American G >vernment the Emm roroftlie F'vnch L would be f'-uitless to cum ment upon the disposition to insist upon the pre vailing influence of a fact wh" )i nolongerexiv| • ; which, when it did exist, was uniformly com haoed ; a the find ext nc ion of which was the manifest consequence ofThe measures of this Government. It the American Government had seized French vessels, as erroneously asserted in the note ol the Duke of Cadore,the occurrence could only have been attributed to the temerity of their owners or comma-i lers. who, afier h pre vious notifir tion, from the 1st of Mar-b i< the 20th of May, of the act of exclusion, would have strangely presumed upon impunity in the viola tion of a prohibitory municipal law of the U. S Had France interdicted to our vessel* all ports within the sphere of her influence, and had she given a warning of vquai duration with that given by our law, there would have been no cause of complaint on the part of the U. S_ The French Government would not then have had the opportunity of exercising its power, in a manner as contrary to the forms as to the spirn ol justice, over the property of liie citizens of the It was, art all times, in the power of France to suspend with regard to herself, our acts o exclusion, of which she complains, by simph annulling or modifying her decrees 'Proposi tions to this effect have been made to her Oov rnment through you. They were not accepter On the contrary, a policy was preferred, whicn was calculated to produce any olnsr result than that of a good understanding between the two countries. By the Act of Congress of the last session an opportunity is again afforded to his Imperial Majesty to establish the mo9t amicable relations between tbc U. S. and France. Let * The letter qf Feb !4fA,1818, from which the ^tfowing if an extract. “ His Majesty could place no reliance on the proceedings of the U. S. who having no ground of complaint against France comprised her in their act# of exclusion, and since the month of May have forbidden the en ranee of their ports to French vessels und'-r the penalty «f confisca tion. As soon as his Majesty was informed of this measure, he considered himself hound to order reprisals on American vessels not only in his territory,hut lib-wise in the countries which are under his influence--In the ports of Hol land, of Spain, of Italy U of Naples, American vessels have been seized, because tbe Ameri esns have seized French vessels. The ' Ameri cans cannot hesitate as to the part which they arc to take. They might either in tear to pieces the act of their independence, and to become again, as !>rf<>re tho revolution, the subp ets of Rutland, or to take such measures as that their com merce and industry should not he tariffed by the English, which renders them more depen dent than Jamaica, which »t least has its As sembly of Representatives and i(# privileges-* Men without just poi ,nca! otewt, without honor, without rnrtyc, may allege that payment of tl. ' tribu'e imposed by J&ijclund may be suhmiitr , to, because it is light j btft why will 'hey „ , perceive that the English will no soo~r have o- • taiued the admisuon of the principle (ban to* will raise the 1'arrtT in such way that the bur then a- first tight* becoming insupportable, will then be necessary to fight for into lest alter' luVoif refused to light far iusou.” him withdraw or modify his decrees ; let h;-* restore the property of our citizens so unjust! seized, ainl a law of the (J. S. exists, which au thorises the President to promote the best possi ble understanding with France, and to impose a system ol'ezclusion against the ships and mar. cliaudise ofG. B. in tiie event of her failing to conform to the same just terms of conciliation.— In fine, as the Emperor will now be acquainted with the fact that no French vessels have been unlawfully s-.-ned in the ports of the If. S.; si the law of exclusion against the commerce of* France is no more in operation, there can be no longer a solitary reasonable pretext for procrasti nating the delivery of the American property, detained by the French Government,into the pos_ session of the respective owners These observations you will not fail to present to the view of the French Government, in order that the Emperor may learn that the U. S. insist upon nothing but theiracknowledged rights, fs. that they still entertain a desire to adjust alk differences with the government of France upon) a basis equally beneficial and honorable to botta nations. I have the honor to be, &c. &c. &c. R. SMITH. Gen. Armstrong, Crc Oc.frc. Instead oi the animadversions contained, in the aforegoing letter, the President di„' rected the insertion of simply the follow ing section in my letter of the 5th ot June, I 1310 : ; “ As the • John Adams’ is daily rxpec* ted, and as your further communications by her will better enable me to adapt to the actual state of our affairs with the French Government, the observations proper to be made in relation l > their seizure of our pra-^ petty and to the letter o' the Dike of C&. * dore of the 14th February, it is by the Pre sident deemed expedient not to make, a£<% this rime, any such animadverrons.——st ‘ i cannot, however, forbear informing you. that a high indignation is felt by the Presi dent, as well as by the public, at this act’. > of violence on our property, and at the owt-i | rage, both in the language and in the mat-* | ter, of the letter of the Duke of Cadore, so ‘justly pourtrayed in your note to him of the J 10th of March.” j It is worthy of notice, that the last sen I tence of the above section was merely &. • communication to General Armstrong, per ; sonally, as to the impression made here by' that outrage the French Government, & that it was not an instruction to hint to make, the F,mpcror of France acquainted witk. the high indignation felt on the occasion by the President and by the Nation. It sim ply shews, that our executive had, at that time, but just resolution enough to impart te its own Minister the sentiments of indigna tion, that had been here excited by the enor - mous outrage of the Ramboiiillet decree amt by the insulting audacity of the Duke of. tadore’s letter. (~ To be continued.) rnQM THE MOSTBEAL GAZETTE. [JVe are indebted to a subscriber fo~\ the foflozoing disjiatch as an accomfiani+ meni to that of Commodore Rodgers Cofly of a disjiatch from At. Gran tirade, to■ the minister of marine. Port Nubius, 27th Qct. 1810. “ Monseigseub, “ Ever zealous for the. honor ot his imperial majesty’s marine ser vice, I was on the look out yesterday, about three, r m. the tide setting in shore, I dis covered the appearance of an enemy’s ves-. sel making the harbor- As it was impossi ble, on firs' view, to ascertain of what furue she might b«, 1 immediately tor car of ac-» cident, ordered out the three frigates, with the corvettes and brigs, which so lately were covered with gi.ny, under the name of’ M. Dubordine. This gallant little recon Aoiteriog squadron soon manoeuvred so as to. surround the object of attack, whicli proved to be the boat ol a British cruizer, drifting from the vessel, having one stout hand oix board last asleep Before the discovery was fully made, two of our frigates being ad a cautious distance, on each side of the vessel, at the same moment fired their broadsides, which passing over the object of their aim, they unfortunately struck each other; but the artillery was, as usual, exeellen.ly served by M. Bombardier, of one vessel, and M. Keiocket of the other, that only two of our men were killed, and, two wounded. The enemy was now board ed by 12 resolute fellows, who volunteered, their service, and who, I hope, will he re warded in the legion of honor. The Bri tish sain*, was made prisoner without much difficulty, having only knocked down one o£ the assailants with his list. This gallant re sistance would have entitled him to oi.r consideration, but, upon being informed he had 'lie honor of being the emperor’s pri-« soner. he, with that scurrility so natural to the British, deliberately consigned certain parts of his imperial majesty’s sacred per son, together with eyes, limbs, body arul bones, to everlasting conde nna ioi being in other respects very perdnacious, a.nd re fusing to tell the force Irorn which his&uatr had been accidentally detached, we thought* proper, on his being brought into port, to place him under a strong military guard, till the celebrated Capuchin friar, who lately took two British sailors and one mus ket, can be sent for to bring him to reason* by proper discipline. The name of the boat unknown * 1 he prisoner, cm being interrogated, says, his name is Tom Groggins; and that, laden with an extra cargo of spirits, lie had been overtaken by sleep : adding, that could he have heaved part of his ballast overboard ia time, he would have escaped the force sent against him, •• I shall have the honor of coonmunica^ ting to your highness the names of the offi_ cers who have the best title to the lavor of his majesty. ** 1 have the honor to be, &c. &c &c. “ GRANTIHADE. “P. S Since writing the above the pri soner has escaped through the indiscretion of the captain of the guard, who upon some occasion of duty withdrew 6 of the 18 meu who were set as cendnela over him. The drums are now beating to arms ; we have manned all the batteries; and the whole of his imperial majesty’s formidable flotilla are putting to sea with all expedition. The prisoner left behind him a greasy tobacco pouch, containing one yard and a half of pigtail tobacco; the latter we divided a mong the troops, who are rather shortened for provisions; and the former we burnt, according to the imperial decree, as being Rritish manufacture*” Order* in CounnV,-—Those who are dtsi rous of a practical exposition of the < ffee: • these unjust edicts, may be gratified in heir wish by perusing die fol|pwjng*i»cCMini n a recent capture under then,. This ]« only one instance among an hond. td J tu **