LOS ANGELES HERALD.
VOL. 37.—N0. 98.
PEACE OR WAR?
Chile Can Have Whichever
She Chooses.
She Must Get Off Her Perch
or Fisht.
The President's Message Laid
Before Congress.
Chile's Conduct Criticised in
Caustic Terms.
A Firm, Fair Demand for Complete
Reparation.
The Dignity of tbe Nation .Must Be Up
held at Any Cost—The message
and Ultimatum Generally
Approved.
Associated Press Dispatches.
Washington, Jan. 25.—The corre
spondence in the Chilean controversy
and the president's message on the
subject were laid before congress to
day. In the house, on motion of
Blount, and in the senate, on motion
of Sherman, tbe message was*referred
to the committee on foreign affairs,
after reading.
.Following ia the text of the mes
sage :
To the Senate and House of Representatives:
In my annual message delivered to
congress at the beginning of the preaent
session, after a brief statement of the
facts then in possession of thia govern
ment, touching on the assault in tbe
streets of Valparaiso, Chile, upon aailora
of the United States ahip Baltimore, Oc
tober 16th, last, I said: "Thia govern
ment ie now awaiting the result of the
investigation which haa been conducted
by the criminal court at Valparaiso. It
is reported unofficially that the investi
gation ia about completed, and it ia ex
pected that the result will soon be com
municated to this government, together
with some adequate and satisfactory re
sponse to the note by which the atten
tion of Chile was called to this incident.
If these just expectations should be dis
appointed o<- further needleaa delay in
*orT»n«e, I will, by special message,
bring this matter again to the attention
of congress for Buch action as may be
necessary."
In my opinion the time ia now come
when I should lay before congress and
the country the correapondence between
this government and the government of
Chile, from the time of the breaking out
of the revolution against Balmaceda, to
gether with all other facts in possession
of tbe executive department relating to
thia matter. The diplomatic corres
pondence ia herewith transmitted, to
gether with the correapondence
between tho naval officers for
the time in command iv Chilean
waters and the secretary of the navy,
and also the ev : dence taken at Mare
Island navy yard since the arrival of
the Baltimore at San Francisco. Ido
not deem it neceaaary in this communi
cation to attempt any full analysis of
the correspondence or of tho evidence.
X brief restatement of the international
questions involved aud the reasons why
the responses of the Chilean govern
ment are unsatisfactory, is all I deem
necessary.
It may be well at tbe outset to say
whatever may have been said in this
country or Chile in criticism of Mr.
Egan, our minister at Santiago, tbe true
history of this exciting period in Chilean
affairs, from the outbreak of tbe revo
lution until this time, discloses no act
on the part of Mr. Egan, unworthy of
his position, or that could justly be the
occasion of any aerious animadversion
or criticism. He haa, I think, on tbe
whole borne himaelf in veiy trying cir
cumstances, with dignity, discretion
and courage, and haa conducted the cor
respondence with ability, courtesy and
fairness.
It is worth while, also, at the begin
ning, to say that the right of Mr. Egan
to give shelter in the legation to certain
adherents of the Balmacedagovernment,
who applied to him for asylum, has not
been denied by the Chilean authorities,
nor has any demand been made for the
surrender of these refugees. That there
was urgent need of asylum, is shown by
Egan's note of August 24, 1891, describ
ing the disorders that prevailed in San
tiago; and by the evidence of Captain
Schley as to the pillage and violence
that prevailed at Valparaiso. The cor
respondence discloses, however, that the
request of Mr. Egan for safe conduct
from the country, in behalf of these
refugees, was denied. Precedents are
cited by him in the correspondence,
particularly in the case of the revolution
in Peru in 1835, tbat did not leave the
Chilean government in a position to
deny the right of asylum to political
refugees, and seemed very clearly to
support Mr. Egan's contention that
safe conduct to neutral territory was
a necessary and acknowledged incident
of asylum. These refugees have very
recently, without formal safe conducts,
but by the acquiescence of the Chilean
authorities, been placed on board tbe
Yorktown, and are now being conveyed
to Callao, Peru.
This incident might be considered
wholly closed but for the disrespect
manifested towards this government by
the close and offensive police surveil
lance of the legation premises, main
tained during the most of the period of
the Btay of the refugees therein. After
the date of my annual message and up
to the time of the transfer of the refu
gees to the Yorktown,the legation prem
ises seem to have been surrounded by
police in uniform and police agents or
detectives in citizens' dress, who offens
ively scrutinized persons entering or
leaving the legation, and on one or more
occasions arrested members of tbe min- 1
ißter's family. Commander Evans,
who by my directions recently
visited "Minister Egan at Santiago,
in his telegram to the navy department
describes the legation ac a ''veritable
prison," and states that the police
agents or detectives were after hia ar
rival withdrawn during hia stay. It
appears further, from a note of Egan of
November 20, 1891, that on one occasion,
at least, theae police agents, whom he
declares to be known to him, invaded
tbe legation premises, pounding on its
windows and using inaulting and threat
ening language toward the peraona
therein. This "breach of the right of tbe
minister to freedom from police es
pionage and restraint seems to have
been so flagrant that the Argentine min
ister, who was dean of the diplomatic
coups, having observed it, felt called
upon to protest againSt it to the
Chilean minister of foreign af
airs. Tbe Chilean authorities have, as will
be observed from the correspondence,
charged the refugees and inmates of the
legation with inaulting the police, but it
eeema to me incredible that men whoae
lives were in jeopardy, and whose safety
could only be secured by retirement and
quietuesa, should have sought to pro
voke a collision which could only end in
their destruction, or to aggravate their
condition by intenaifying popular feel
ing tbat at one time ao threatened the
legation aa to require Mr. Egan to ap
peal to the minister of foreign affairs.
But the most serious incident dis
closed by correspondence was that of the
attack on sailora of the Baltimore in the
streets of Valparaiso on the 10th of Oc
tober last.
In my annual message, speaking upon
the information then in my possession,
I Baid bo far as I had yet been able to
learn, no other explanation of this
bloody work had been suggested, than
that it had had ita origin in hostility to
these men aa sailora of the United
Statea, wearing the uniform of their
government, aad not in any individual
act or personal animosity. We have
now received from the Chilean govern
ment an abstract of the conclusions of
the fiscal general, upon teatimony taken
by the judge of Crimea in an investiga
tion madeto extend over nearly three
months. I very much regret to be com
pelled to aay that this report doea not
enable me to modify the conclusion an
nounced in my annual message. lam
still of the opinion that our sailors wera
assaulted, beaten, stabbed and killed,
not for anything they or any one of
them had done, but for what the govern
ment of the United Statea had done, or
was charged with having done by its
civil officers and naval commanders. If
that be the true aspect of the case, the
injury was to the government of the
United States, hot to those poor sailora
who were assaulted in a manner ao
brutal and cowardly.
Before attampting to give an outline
of the facts upon which this conclusion
rests, I think it right to aay a word or
two upon the legal aspect of the case.
Tho Baltimore waa in the harbor of Val
paraiso, by virtue of the general invita
tion which nations are held to extend to
the war vessels of other powers with
which the? have friendly relatione.
Thia invitation, I think, muat be held,
ordinarily, to embrace tbe privilegea of
auch communication with the shore as
is reasonable, necessary and proper for
tbe comfort and convenience of the
officers and men of such veasels. Cap
tain Schley testifies that when his ves
sel returned to Valparaiso, September
14th, the city officers, as customary, ex
tended the hospitalities of the city to
his officers and crew. It ia not claimed
that every personal collision or injury in
which a sailor or veasel visiting a shore
may be iuvolved, raiaesan international
question, but I am of the opinion that
where such sailora or officers are
aasaulted by the reßident population,
animated by hostility to the government
whose uniform theae sailora and ofiiceis
wear, and in resentment of acts done by
their government, not by them, their
nation must take notice oi the event ai
one involving an infraction of its rights
and dignity ; not in a secondary way,
aa where a citizen ia injured and pre
sents his claim through our own gov
ernment, but in a primary way, pre
cisely as if its minister or consul or flag
itself had been the object ol the same
character of assault.
The officers and sailors of the Balti
more were in the harbor of Valparaiso,
under order of their government, not by
their own choice; they were upon the
shore by implied invitation of the gov
ernment of Chile, and with the approval
of their commanding officer, and it does
not distinguish their case from that of a
consul tbat has a stay more permanent,
or that he holds the express invitation
of the local government to justify his
longer resideuce; nor does it affect the
question that the injury was the act of
a mob. If there had been no participa
tion by the police or military in this evil
work, and no neglect on their part to
extend to them protection, the case
would still be one, in my opinion, when
its extent and character is considered,
involving international rights.
The president then tells the story of
the attack on the sailors of the Balti
more, as related in the testimony of
Captain Schley and others, at the inves
tigation, Bhowing that the sailors were
sober and behaving themselves, evi
denced further by tho fact that the
Chilean police made no arrests, and
says: It is remarkable that the pro
tracted investigation of tbe judge of
crimes did not enable him to assign any
more satisfactory account of its origin
than that it was a quarrel between
drunken sailors.
He then quotes the testimony of Ap
prentice Talbot, that the trouble orig
inated in a Chilean sailor spitting in
Talbot's face, for which Talbot knocked
him down. Then followed a general
attack on Talbot and Riggin, with the
result already known. The president
continues: There is nothing in the
report of the Chilean investigation made
to us that seriously impeaches this tes
timony. It appears from Chilean sources
thatalmost instant'.y, with a suddenness
that strongly implies meditation and
preparation, a mob, stated by the police
authorities at one time to number 2000,
and at another 1000, engaged in an as
sault upon our sailors, who are repre
sented as resisting with stones, clubs
and "bright" arms. The report of the
intendente of October 30th, states that
the fight began at 6 p. m. in three
streets which are named; that the in
formation was received at tbe intenden
cia at 6:15, and that the police arrived
on the scene at 0:30, a full half hour
after the assault began. By tbat time,
he saye, a mob of 2000 men bad col
lected, and that for several squares there
waa the appearance oi "a real battle
TUESDAY MORNING. JANUARY 2G, 1892 —TEN PAGES.
field." The scene at this point is very
graphically set before us by Chilean tes
timony. The American sailors who,
after bo long an examination, bad not
been found guilty of any breach of the
peace, so far as the Chilean authoritiee
are able to diecover, unarmed and de
fenseless, are fleeing for their lives, pur
sued by an overwhelming num
ber, and fighting only to effect
their own escape from death,
or succor some mate whose life is in
greater peril. Eighteen of them are
brutally stabbed and beaten, while one
Chilean seems from the report to have
suffered some injury, but how serious,
or by what character of weapon, or
whether by a missile thrown by our
men or by some of his fellow rioters, ia
unascertained. The pretense that our
men were fighting with atones, cluba
and bright anna, in view of these facts,
ia incredible. It ia further refuted by
the fact that our prisoners, when
searched, were absolutely without arms,
only seven pen-knives being found in
the possession of the men are steel,
while there were received by our men
more than thirty stab wounds, every
one of which waa inflicted in the back,
and almost every contused wound on
the back or back of the head. The evi
dence of the ahip'a officer of the day is
that even the jack-knives of the men
were taken from the men before leaving
the ship.
As to the brutal nature of the treat
ment received by our men, the president
quoted an extract from the account
given of the affair by La Patria, a news
paper which, he says, cannot be re
garded aa too friendly. It tells how our"
men were pursued with atones and mia-
Biles and beaten down, as haa already
been told many timea. The meesage
continues: Ko amount of evasion or
subterfuge is able to cloud our clear
vision of this brutal work. It should be
noticed in thia connection that the
American sailora arreated, after exam
ination, were, during four days follow
ing the arreat, every one discharged, no
charge of any breach of peace or other
criminal conduct having been sustained
against a eingle one of them. Judge of
Crimes Eoßter, in a note to the in
tendente, under date October 23d, be
fore the dispatch from thia government
of the following day, which aroused
the authorities of Chile to a better
sense of tbe gravity of tbe affair,
aaya: "Having presided temporarily
over thia court in regard to the seamen
of the Baltimore, who have been tried
on account of the deplorable conduct
which took place, etc." A noticeable
point here is that our Bailors had been
tried before the 22d of the month, and
the trial resulted in their acquittal and
return to their vessel. It ia quite re
markable and quite characteristic of tbe
management ot this affair by the Chilean
police authorities, that we should now
be advised that Seaman Davidson of
the Baltimore bad been included in the
indictment, hiß offense being, so far as I
have been able to ascertain, that he at-,
tempted to defend a shipmate against
assault, and who waa Doing etruck with
a knife. Perfect vindication of our men
is furnished by thia report: One only ia
found to have been guilty of criminal
fault, and that for an act of gallantry.
As to the part taken by the police in
the affair, the case made by Chile ie also
far from satisfactory. The point where
Riggin waa killed is only three minutes'
walk from the police station, and not
more than twice that distance from tbe
intendencia; and yet, according to their
official report a full half hour passed
afttr the assault began before the police
were upon tne ground. It has been
stated that all but two of our men said
the police did their duty. The evidence
taken at Mare island shows that if such
statement were procured from our men,
it was accomplished by requiring them
to sign writing in a language they did
not understand. By their representa
tion it was a mere declaration that they
had taken no part in the disturbance.
Lieutenant McCrea, who acted aa inter
preter, i ays in his evidence, when the
sailors were examined before the court
the subject, of the conduct of the police
waa carefully avoided. He reported the
fact to Captain Schley on his return to
the vessel. Tho evidence in existence
of the animosity toward our Bailors in
the minds of the sailors of the Chilean
navy and the populace of Valparaiso is
bo abundant and various aa to leave no
doubt in tha mind of anyone who will
examine the papers submitted.
It manifested itself in threaten
ing and insulting gestures toward
our men aa they passed a Chilean
man-of-war in their boata, and in deri
sive and abuaive epithets with which
they greeted every appearance of au
American sailor on the evening of the
riot. Captain Schley reports that boata
from Chilean warahipa several timea
went out of their course to crosa the
bow of his boat, compelling them to
back water. He complained of the die
courtesy, and it waa corrected. That
thia feeling was shared by men of higher
rank, is shown by an incident related by
Surgeon Stitt, of the Baltimore. After
the battle of Placilla, he, with other
medical officers of the war vessels in the
harbor, were giving voluntary assistance
to the wounded in the hospitala. A son
of a Chilean army officer of rank was
under hia care, and when hia father d'a
covered it he flew into a paasion, and
said he would rather his son should die
than have an American touch him, and at
once had him removed from the ward.
This feeling waa not well concealed in
dispatchea of the foreign office, and had
quite an open expreesion in the disre
spectful treatment of the American lega
tion. Chilean boatmen in the bay re
fused even tor large offers of money to
return our Bailors, who were crowded to
the mole, to their ship when they were
endeavoring to escape from the city on
the night of the assault. The market
boat of the Baltimore was threatened,
and even quite recently the gig of Com
mander Evana, of the Yorktown, was
stoned while waiting for him at tbe
mole.
Tbe evidence of our sailora clearly
shows that the attack was expected by
the Chilean people; that threats had
been made againßt our men, and in one
case, somewhat early in the afternoon,
the keeper of the house into which some
of our men had gone, closed the estab
lishment in anticipation of an attack,
which he advised them would be made
upon them as darkness came on. In the
report of Captain Schley to the navy de
partment he Bays: "In the only inter
view that I had with Judge Foater, who
waß investigating the case relative to
the disturbance before he was aware of
the entire gravity of the matter, he in
formed me that the assault upon my
men was the outcome of the hatred for
our people among the lower classes, be
cause they thought we sympathized with
the Balmaceda government on account
of tbe Itata. Whether with reason or
without he could of course hot admit,
but such he thought was the explana
tion of the assault at tbat time."
Several of our men Bought security
from tbe mob by such complete or par
tial changes in their dress as would con
ceal the fact of their being seamen of the
Baltimore, and found it then possible to
walk the streets without molestation.
These incidents conclusively establish
tbat tbe attack was upon the uniform
and nationality, and not upon the men.
The origin of this feeling ia probably
found in the refusal of thia government
to give recognition to the Congressional
party before it had established itself; in
the seizure of the Itata for alleged vio
lation of the neutrality law; in the cable
incident, and in the charge tbat Ad
miral Brown conveyed information to
Valparaiso of tbe landing at Quinteros.
It is not my purpose to enter here any
defense of the action of thia government
in theae matters. It is enough for the
present purpose to say, if there was any
breach of international comity or duty
on our part, it should have been made
the subject of official complaint through
diplomatic channels, or of reprisals, for
which full responsibility waa as
sumed. We cannot consent that
theße incidents and these perversiong
of truth shall be used to excite a mur
derous attack upon our unoffending
Eailors, and the government of Chile go
acquit of responsibility. In fact, the
conduct this government, during the war
in Chile, pursued, were lines of inter
national duty which we had so Btrongly
insisted upon on the part of other na
tiona when this country waa in the
throes of civil conflict. We continued
the established diplomatic relatione
with the government in power until it
waa overthrown, and promptly and cor
dially recognized the new government
when it was established. The good
offices of our government were offered to
bring about a peaceful adjustment, and
the interposition of Mr. Egan to miti
gate tha severity of punishment and
ahelter the adherenta of the Congress
ional party, were effective and frequent.
The charge against Admiral Brown ia too
base to gain credence with any one who
knows his high personal and profes
aional character.
Recurring to tbe evidence of onr sail
ors, I think it is shown there were sev
eral distinct assaults, and ao nearly sim
ultaneously, aa to show they did not
spread from one point. The press sum
mary of the report of the fiscal, shows
that the evidence of the Chilean officials
and others ia in conflict aa to tbe place
of origin, several placea being named
by different witnesses as the locality
where the first outbreak occurred. This,
if co'rectly reported, shows there were
several distinct outbreaks, and so nearly
at the earae time aB to cause this confu
sion. La Patria, in the same isaue irom
which I have already quoted, after de
scribing the killing of Riggin and the
light which from that point extended to
the mole, save: "At the same time in
another street of the port, Yankee sail
ors fought fiercely with tbe people of
the towrj-who believed to sco in them
incarnate enemies of the Chilean navy."
The testimony of Captain Jenkina of
the American merchant ship Kewee
naw, which had gone to Valparaiso for
repairs, and who was a witness to some
part of the assault upon the crew of the
Baltimore, is strongly corroborative of
the testimony of our own eailora, when
he says be caw Chilean sentries drive
back a seaman seeking shelter from the
mob that was pursuing him. The offi
cers and men of Captain Jenkina'a ship
furnish most conclusive teatimony to
the indignities practiced toward Ameri
cans in Valparaiso. When American
sailors, even of a merchant ahip, can
only secure their safety by denying their
nationality, it must be time to readjust
our relations with the government that
permits such demonstrations.
Aa to the participation of police offi
cers, the evidence of our sailora shows
that our men were struck and beaten by
police officers before and after arreßt,
and that one, at least, was dragged with
a lasso about hia neck by a mounted
policeman. That the death of Riggin
was the result of a rifle shot fired by a
policeman or soldier on duty, ia shown
directly by the testimony oi Johnson, in
whose arms he waa at the time, aud by
the evidence of Charles Langen, an
American sailor, not then a member of
the Baltimore's crew, who stood close
by and saw the transaction. The
Chilean authorities do not pretend to fix
the responsibility of this shot upon auy
particular person, but avow their in
ability to ascertain who fired it, further
than it was fired from the crowd. The
character of the wound, as des
cribed by the surgeons of the
Baltimore, clearly supports his
opinion that it was made by a rifle
ball, the orifice of exit being as much
aa an inch or an inch and a quarter in
width. When shot, the poor fellow waa
unconscious and in the arms of a com
rade, who waa endeavoring to carry him
to a neighboring drug store for treat
ment. The story of the police that in
coming up the street they paased those
men and left them behind them, ia in
consistent with their own statement as
to tbe direction of their approach, and
with their duty to protect tin m, and is
clearly disproved. In fact Riggin was
in front of the advancing force, aud not
standing in a crowd, but unconscious
and supported in the arms of Johnson
when shot.
After summarizing the correspondence
up to a certain point, he aaya: The
communications of the Chilean govern
ment in relation to thia cruel and dia
astrous attack upon our men, aa will
appear from the correspondence, has not
in any degree taken the form of a manly
and satisfactory expression of regret,
much less apology. The event was of
so serious a character that if the injury
Buffered by our men waß wholly the re
sult of accident in a Chilean port, the
incident was grave enough to have
called for public expreesion of sympathy
and regret from the local authorities. It
is not enough to say the incident
ia regretted, coupled with a statement
that the affair waa not of an unuaual
character in ports were foreign eailors
are accustomed to meet. It is not for a
generous and sincere government to
seek for words of small or equivocal
meaning in which to convey to a friendly
power an apology for an offense bo
atrocious as thia. In the case of the
assault by a mob in New Orleans upon
the Spanish consulate in 1851, Webster
wrote to the Spanish minister (Calde
ron) that the acts complained of were
"a disgraceful and flagrant breach of
duty and propriety," and that hie gov
ernment "regret! them as deeply as
STORE^ TALK!
I TELL YOU, YOUNG MAN, THAT—
The superiority or inferiority of Shoes is shown in the
wear, the comfort and the style.
Giving, as we do, proper attention to each little detail
in the make-up of our shoes, we can safely pronounce them
perfect.
Quality in Men's Shoes is gratifying to the wearer.
Cling Tightly to this word Quality. Hold it up and
examine it —study it—think about it. The profits of the
Shoe Business are seemingly locked in an impregnable
vault, but the combination unlocks at the word quality.
128, 130, 132, 134 N. SPRING STREET.
WHOLESALE. -HK- RETAIL.
Minister Calderon or hia government
could possibly do;" that "these acta
have caused the preaident great pain,
and he thinks a proper acknowledgment
is due to her majesty." He invited the
Spanieh consul to return to hia post,
guaranteeing him safety, and offered to
salute the Spanish flag if tbe coneul
should come in a Spanish vessel. Such
treatment by the government of Chile
of this assault would have been more
creditable to the Chilean authorities,
and much leas can hardly be satisfactory
to a government that values its dignity
and honor.
In our note of Octcber 23d, last,
which appears in the correspondence,
after receiving the report, of the board
of officera appointed by Captain Schley
to inveatigate the affair, the Chilean
government was advised of the aspect
which it then assumed, and called upon
for any facts in its poßseasion that might
tend to modify the unfavorable impres
sion which our report had created. It
ia very clear from the correspondence
that, before the receipt oi thia note,
the examination waa regarded by the
police authorities aa practically closed.
It was, however, reopened and pro
tracted through nearly three montha.
We might justly complain of thiß un
reaaoable delay, but, in view of the
fact that the government of Chile was
still provisional, and the disposition to
be forbearing and hopeful of a friendly
termination, I have awaited the report
which has but recently been made.
On the 21at inatant I cauaed to be
communicated to the government of
Chile, by the American miniater at
Santiago, the conclusions of thia govern
ment, after full consideration of all the
evidence and every suggestion affecting
thia matter, and to these conclusions I
adhere. They were stated as follows:
First—That the assault ia not re
lieved of the aspect which the early in
formation oi the event gave it, viz: that
of an attack upon the uniform of the
United States navy, having ita origin
and motive in a feeling of hoatility to
this government, and not in any act of
a eailor, or any of them.
Second—Tbat the public authorities
of Valparaiso flagrantly failed in their
duty to protect our men, and that come
of the police and of Chile'a soldiers and
sailora were themselvea guilty of un
provoked assaults upon our Bailors before
and after arrest. He (the president)
thinks tho preponderance of the evi
dence and the inherent probabilities
lead to the conclusion tbat Riggin wafl
killed by police or soldiers.
Third —That he (the president) is
therefore compelled to bring the case
back to the position taken by thia gov
ernment in the note of Mr. Wharton, of
October Sod last, and to ask for a suit
able apology and for some adequate
reparation for the injury done to this
government.
In the same note the attention of tbe
Chilean government is called to the
offensive character of the note addressed
by Matta, ex-minißterof foreign affairs, to
the Chilean miniater at this capital, on
the 11th nit. This dispatch waa not
officially communicated to this govern
ment, out as Minister Montt was
directed to translate and give it to the
press of this country, it seemed to me it
could not pass without official notice.
[CONTINUED ON FIFTn PAGE.]
Good values in Fine Tailoring a Perfect
Fit, and a large New Stock at 126 W.
Third street. H. A. Gets.
FIVE CENTS.
DENTAL PARLORS.
Special attention given to the performance of
all dentO operations in the evening by the uae
of a Hpecial system of Kleclric Lights. All
work guaranteed, fiices consistent with First
class work.
office Hours—S a.m. to 5 p.m. Evening
hours. 7 to 10 p.m.
|DR. J. A. CUONKHITE, Dentist,
455 80UTH BROADWAY,
1-20 3m Corner Fifth street-
DENTISTRY!
Only thirty days' dentistry at the fol
lowing prices :
Old Teeth Cappod With Gold, and Teeth Without Flttsi
Gold Fillings a Specialty
A Set of Teeth $ 6 00
Best Set of Teeth on Rubber 9 00
" " " Celluloid 9 00
" " " Aluminium 20 00
" " Gold 35 00
There are no better teeth, no matter how
much you pay.
Teeth extracted 25 cents
" " without pain 50 cents
Teeth filled with amalgam 75 cents
" " " silver 75 cents
" " " gold alloy Jl up
" " " gold $150 up
White filling r* cents
Sold and porcelain ero\vr_s SO
All operations painless to a degree that can
not fail to satisfy.
All work warranted. Consultation and ex
amination free.
These prices end February Ist. Call and
make contracts or you will miss it.
Dr. J. Harbin Pollock & Bro.,
12-29 lm 107 N. Spring st. Sehuraaker blk.
I LLICH'S
RESTAURANT.
Everything New and First-ola**.
145 and 147 ». stain Street,
apaa-M T?RRV HJjT'IH Proprietor
PIONEER TRUCK 00.
uccessors to McLain & Lelimau,)
PBOrEICTOBB Or THE
Pioneer Truck & Transfer Co.
Piano and Safe Moving a Specialty.
Telephone 137 8 Market at. Lm Angelea' OsA
leva